Holy Church tells priests that they have to “Say The Black and Do The Red”. We are to obey the rubrics of liturgical worship and stick to the texts. Priests cannot – bishops cannot – on their own authority change the rubrics or texts. In some few cases the law gives us flexibility. In most we don’t have flexibility.
So, a priest who is not obeying the liturgical law already has a problem. But when he is called to account by legitimate authority, such as the diocesan bishop, and told to stop doing what he is doing and then that priest does not obey, that priest has another problem.
Thus we come to the sad case of Fr. William Rowe in Illinois, who now has a bigger problem than he had before and, by his actions, has hurt a lot of people and caused a scandal.
Illinois priest who freelanced his prayers loses his job
For 18 years, the Rev. William Rowe has done a little improvising while celebrating Mass on Sunday mornings at St. Mary’s Catholic Church in Mount Carmel, Ill. [I wonder how much is a “little”.]
Now those deviations have led to his resignation in an incident that may be tied to global changes to the Catholic liturgy.
Last Sunday, instead of saying “Lord our God that we may honor you with all our mind and love everyone in truth of heart,” [The Collect.] during the opening prayer, he altered the phrasing to better reflect the day’s Gospel message, in which Jesus heals a man with a troubled spirit.
“We thank you, God, for giving us Jesus who helped us to be healed in mind and heart and proclaim his love to others,” the 72-year-old priest prayed instead. [Good grief.]
Three days later, Rowe received a letter from Bishop Edward Braxton accepting his resignation.
“The problem is that when I pray at Mass, I tend to change the words that are written in the book to match what I was talking about, or what a song is about,” Rowe said in an interview. [So, Father has made Mass be about his personal views?]
The book in question is the Roman Missal, a book of prayers, chants and responses used during the Mass. Rowe has been saying some of those prayers in his own words for years.
But in December the Vatican-mandated adoption of a new English-language translation of the Missal may have given bishops an opportunity to rein in freewheeling priests who have been praying in their own words for decades.
“Since December when the new translation came out, no one has said what would happen to you if you changed stuff,” said the Rev. John Foley, director of the Center for Liturgy at St. Louis University. “But I find it hard to believe a priest in Illinois would be forced to resign because he wasn’t using the exact words from the translation. It’s not a strong-enough offense for that.” [Maybe that’s not the only problem. It is true that you don’t get the heave-ho for for changing a Collect. If you change it to something heretical, that could be a more serious problem. If you do it all the time, that’s a bigger problem. If you refuse to stop, that’s a bigger problem.]
In the wake of sweeping changes in the church as a result of the Second Vatican Council, some priests in the 1970s began using their own words and phrasing in place of the verbatim translations of the original Latin liturgy in the Missal, Foley said. He said there has never been an established penalty for improvising nonalterable prayers, and bishops have traditionally [wrongly, too] looked past an individual priest’s extemporizing. [Bishops have a lot on their plates and this sort of thing isn’t thought as pressing as other matters. I think our liturgical worship is a key element of our identity.]
Monsignor Kevin Irwin, professor of liturgical studies at the Catholic University of America, said there are some prayers said by a priest at Mass in which he is “beholden to the structure not to the words.”
But there are also prayers that priests are “duty bound to say,” said the Rev. John Baldovin, professor of historical and liturgical theology at Boston College. Most of the prayers in the Missal, in fact, are not optional, he said.
Rowe said Belleville’s previous bishop, Wilton Gregory, had discussed his off-the-cuff prayer habit with him, referring to the practice as “pushing the envelope.” He said five years ago, Braxton also discussed the matter with him, and asked him to read directly from the Missal.
“I told him I couldn’t do that,” Rowe said. “That’s how I pray.”
Last summer, Rowe said, Braxton made it clear to his priests that “no priest may deviate from any wording in the official Missal.”
In October, two months ahead of the introduction of the new Missal translation, Braxton said he couldn’t permit Rowe to continue improvising, according to Rowe. The priest offered his resignation but didn’t receive a response.
Braxton did not respond to a request for an interview with the Post-Dispatch.
On Monday, Braxton wrote Rowe a letter informing him that he’d accepted his resignation.
The action did not sit well with the nearly 500 families at St. Mary’s, some of whom are contemplating a letter writing campaign to Braxton. “They’re devastated,” said Alice Worth, principal at St. Mary’s School. “Father Bill is the backbone of our parish.”
“The ways Father changed the Mass ritual with his words have only made it more meaningful to us as opposed to distancing us from the church,” Worth said. “Everything he does is based on our faith, it’s not just a whim. There’s a reason for every word he prays.” [Who was doing the distancing all this time? Every time Fr. Rowe changed the prayers he distanced himself and the people from the way the Church prays.]
Sad business. I hope this will be resolved peacefully.