I saw a rather cool series of photos from the B&W age which have been colorized. The colorized versions give an entirely different “feel” to the moment.
Watch out, Father. I remember a cartoon I saw once, I think originating in the New Yorker, with St Peter confronting a potential new candidate for Heaven at the Pearly Gates.
But St Peter is consulting the book and says, “You colorized Casablanca. How unfortunate.”
oh those are amazing. thank you for posting these. They are simply beautiful. This is photojournalism I guess, a photo that so well captures an image or a moment it makes you feel it.
“Easter eggs for Hitler”, hehe.
Lincoln has a striking appearance, with or without color. The passing of Churchill marked the end of Britain as the model society, so that the nation has slipped from happy full-colour to sad greyness. The first image is certainly made more human by the addition of color.
Lest some of the younger viewers be misled by the 1970 reference in the link, it should be stated that color photography was not all that unusual in earlier decades. Kodacolor was released for the mass market in 1942, I believe, and color photos start appearing in my family’s albums in 1948. (Sadly those originals are badly yellowed today.) But there are also examples of colorized photos very similar to those here dating from the 30’s and 40’s.
The thing that always bugs me about tinted or colorized photos is teeth (some shown at the link). Unless the subject has perfectly white teeth, they always show up gray. Whoever does this should at least give them a tinge of yellow.
Wonderful technology.
I recall that many in the film industry oppose the digital “colorization” of classic black and white films, because the original art form had its own unique qualities (e.g., Who would dare to colorize Michelangelo’s Pieta?)
As always, the great Bill Watterson (“Calvin and Hobbes”) had his own explanation of why old photographs are always black and white: http://stephen-coley.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/calvin-and-hobbes-dad-1.jpg
Calvin and Hobbes also sported this amusing reflection on “seeing things in terms of black and white”: http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/1991/02/03
I’ve read somewhere that that was prompted by Watterson being accused of “having a black and white view of the issue” when fighting over the licensing and merchandise issue.
On-topic: That first one looks… so brown. I wonder what that scene looked like actually standing there? Maybe it was all that brown. Maybe the sunlight was more palpable. Yes, the sunlight was definitely more palpable — country that dry gets enough sun that it would have to be palpable; I would know, the palpability of the sunlight is one of the things that has struck me on my few and brief sojourns in southwest country.
The Civil War photos as the least accurate of the bunch. The broad brimmed hats the officers are wearing should be black. For those who know, it’s jarring.
The one you posted with Lincoln looks like wax figures, particularly the biggest killer in American history. That would be Lincoln, in case anyone wonders; the man who stomped all over the Constitution, and set the stage for where we are today.
I am not a fan of colorizing old photos. Photographs are both works of art and historical documents. A good photographer knows his medium, whether it is a digital sensor, color or B&W film or even glass plates. His composition is built around the specific strengths and limitations of the media. I actually think some of these photos lost some impact by the addition of color since color photographs tend draw the viewers attention in different ways than black and white photographs do. Lets take the Churchill portrait as an example. I find my eye drawn to his left hand, something I never really noticed in the B&W version of the portrait, certainly trivial compared to the apparent expression of defiance on Churchill’s face (it was actually annoyance as the Photographer had snatched the cigar from Churchill to get his attention). Also, the image has been brightened considerably; in the original there is just a hint of a glow behind Churchill that in some way suggests England as being one of the sole lights against the Darkness that had spread across Europe. That impact is lost in the color photo where the glow has been expanded considerably.
From the perspective of a historical document, adding color often adds information that may be false to the actual history (such as hair and eye color, the color of structures or clothes).
Comments are closed.
SHOPPING ONLINE? Please, come here first!
Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.
“This blog is like a fusion of the Baroque ‘salon’ with its well-tuned harpsichord around which polite society gathered for entertainment and edification and, on the other hand, a Wild West “saloon” with its out-of-tune piano and swinging doors, where everyone has a gun and something to say. Nevertheless, we try to point our discussions back to what it is to be Catholic in this increasingly difficult age, to love God, and how to get to heaven.” – Fr. Z
ThePapalCount on ROME 24/4– Day 28: bad news and good news: “Fr Z I agree with MaternalView above. The world situation is shaky and a trip to Poland… next to Ukraine…”
adriennep on Faith practice declining far and wide…. except…: “Lori announced massive parish closings, along with the suppression of the Latin Mass in diocese. Sure suicide by cutting off…”
Kathleen10 on ROME 24/4– Day 28: bad news and good news: “I think people have lost confidence in all manner of things, airplane manufacturers, airlines, FAA, government agencies who are supposed…”
maternalView on ROME 24/4– Day 28: bad news and good news: “Perhaps world events are making some nervous international travelers. Personally, I would have loved to go to Poland on a…”
voxborealis on ROME 24/4– Day 28: bad news and good news: “The bit about Claudius thinking that a return to the republic was likely or even possible may take its inspiration…”
Everyone, work to get this into your parish bulletins and diocesan papers.
The most evident mark of God’s anger and the most terrible castigation He can inflict upon the world are manifested when He permits His people to fall into the hands of clerics who are priests more in name than in deed, priests who practice the cruelty of ravening wolves rather than the charity and affection of devoted shepherds.
St. John Eudes
Federated Computer… your safe and private alternative to big biz corporations that hate us while taking our money and mining our data. Have an online presence large or small? Catholic DIOCESE? Cottage industry? See what Federated has to offer. Save money and gain peace of mind.
“Until the Lord be pleased to settle, through the instrumentality of the princes of the Church and the lawful ministers of His justice, the trouble aroused by the pride of a few and the ignorance of some others, let us with the help of God endeavor with calm and humble patience to render love for hatred, to avoid disputes with the silly, to keep to the truth and not fight with the weapons of falsehood, and to beg of God at all times that in all our thoughts and desires, in all our words and actions, He may hold the first place who calls Himself the origin of all things.”
To donate monthly I prefer Zelle because it doesn't extract fees. Use
frz AT wdtprs DOT com
Daily Quiz
Use FATHERZ10 at checkout for 10% off
Donate using VENMO
GREAT BEER from Traditional Benedictine Monks in Italy
CLICK and say your daily offerings!
A Daily Prayer for Priests
NEW OPPORTUNITY – 10% off with code: FATHERZ10
Fr. Z’s VOICEMAIL
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265
Books which you must have.
This REALLY helps! And it’s great coffee (and tea)
I use this when I travel both in these USA and abroad. Very useful. Fast enough for Zoom. I connect my DMR (ham radio) through it. If you use my link, they give me more data. A GREAT back up.
“He [Satan] will set up a counter-Church which will be the ape of the Church because, he the devil, is the ape of God. It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the anti-Christ that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ. In desperate need for God, whom he nevertheless refuses to adore, modern man in his loneliness and frustration will hunger more and more for membership in a community that will give him enlargement of purpose, but at the cost of losing himself in some vague collectivity.”
“Who is going to save our Church? Not our bishops, not our priests and religious. It is up to you, the people. You have the minds, the eyes, and the ears to save the Church. Your mission is to see that your priests act like priests, your bishops act like bishops.”
“The modern habit of doing ceremonial things unceremoniously is no proof of humility; rather it proves the offender's inability to forget himself in the rite, and his readiness to spoil for every one else the proper pleasure of ritual.”
- C.S. Lewis
This blog has to earn its keep!
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful. Zelle and Wise are better, but PayPal is convenient.
A monthly subscription donation means I have steady income I can plan on. I put you my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I often say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
To donate monthly I prefer Zelle because it doesn't extract fees. Use
frz AT wdtprs DOT com
As for Latin…
"But if, in any layman who is indeed imbued with literature, ignorance of the Latin language, which we can truly call the 'catholic' language, indicates a certain sluggishness in his love toward the Church, how much more fitting it is that each and every cleric should be adequately practiced and skilled in that language!" - Pius XI
"Let us realize that this remark of Cicero (Brutus 37, 140) can be in a certain way referred to [young lay people]: 'It is not so much a matter of distinction to know Latin as it is disgraceful not to know it.'" - St. John Paul II
Grant unto thy Church, we beseech Thee, O merciful God, that She, being gathered together by the Holy Ghost, may be in no wise troubled by attack from her foes. O God, who by sin art offended and by penance pacified, mercifully regard the prayers of Thy people making supplication unto Thee,and turn away the scourges of Thine anger which we deserve for our sins. Almighty and Everlasting God, in whose Hand are the power and the government of every realm: look down upon and help the Christian people that the heathen nations who trust in the fierceness of their own might may be crushed by the power of thine Arm. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end. R. Amen.
This is really useful when travelling… and also when you aren’t and you need backup internet NOW! I use this for my DMR “Zednet” hotspot when I’m mobile. It’s a ham radio thing.
If you travel internationally, this is a super useful gizmo for your mobile internet data. I use one. If you get one through my link, I get data rewards.
Please use my links when shopping! I depend on your help.
Watch out, Father. I remember a cartoon I saw once, I think originating in the New Yorker, with St Peter confronting a potential new candidate for Heaven at the Pearly Gates.
But St Peter is consulting the book and says, “You colorized Casablanca. How unfortunate.”
She’s very good! In the photo entitled “Union Soldiers Taking a Break 1863,” bottom right with the pooch is Lieutenant George Armstrong Custer with staff members of General Fitz-John Porter.
http://r2-store.distractify.netdna-cdn.com/postimage/201409/15/560e217553f6d93ed5efd20be09c22b5_650x.jpg
–Guy
The picture of Lou Gehrig (at the link) is heartbreaking. He only had two years to live.
oh those are amazing. thank you for posting these. They are simply beautiful. This is photojournalism I guess, a photo that so well captures an image or a moment it makes you feel it.
“Easter eggs for Hitler”, hehe.
Lincoln has a striking appearance, with or without color. The passing of Churchill marked the end of Britain as the model society, so that the nation has slipped from happy full-colour to sad greyness. The first image is certainly made more human by the addition of color.
Follow the link. The photos are simply captivating. I could study them all day and construct a different perspective of life decades or centuries ago.
Imagine color photographs from biblical times?
Lest some of the younger viewers be misled by the 1970 reference in the link, it should be stated that color photography was not all that unusual in earlier decades. Kodacolor was released for the mass market in 1942, I believe, and color photos start appearing in my family’s albums in 1948. (Sadly those originals are badly yellowed today.) But there are also examples of colorized photos very similar to those here dating from the 30’s and 40’s.
The thing that always bugs me about tinted or colorized photos is teeth (some shown at the link). Unless the subject has perfectly white teeth, they always show up gray. Whoever does this should at least give them a tinge of yellow.
The Napoleon poses are even better in color.
I appreciated this creative explanation of the history of color photography:
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2jg5c00&s=5#.VDplYtq9KSM
Wonderful technology.
I recall that many in the film industry oppose the digital “colorization” of classic black and white films, because the original art form had its own unique qualities (e.g., Who would dare to colorize Michelangelo’s Pieta?)
As always, the great Bill Watterson (“Calvin and Hobbes”) had his own explanation of why old photographs are always black and white:
http://stephen-coley.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/calvin-and-hobbes-dad-1.jpg
Calvin and Hobbes also sported this amusing reflection on “seeing things in terms of black and white”:
http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/1991/02/03
I’ve read somewhere that that was prompted by Watterson being accused of “having a black and white view of the issue” when fighting over the licensing and merchandise issue.
On-topic: That first one looks… so brown. I wonder what that scene looked like actually standing there? Maybe it was all that brown. Maybe the sunlight was more palpable. Yes, the sunlight was definitely more palpable — country that dry gets enough sun that it would have to be palpable; I would know, the palpability of the sunlight is one of the things that has struck me on my few and brief sojourns in southwest country.
I find the picture of Pres. Lincoln fascinating. His top hat, his long thin frame, the awkward stance next to the military officer.
His presence isn’t so much imposing as it is captivating.
(just noticed the minor photobomb by the soldier)
As for Churchill. If that face isn’t the definition of gravitas, I don’t know what is.
The Civil War photos as the least accurate of the bunch. The broad brimmed hats the officers are wearing should be black. For those who know, it’s jarring.
The one you posted with Lincoln looks like wax figures, particularly the biggest killer in American history. That would be Lincoln, in case anyone wonders; the man who stomped all over the Constitution, and set the stage for where we are today.
I am not a fan of colorizing old photos. Photographs are both works of art and historical documents. A good photographer knows his medium, whether it is a digital sensor, color or B&W film or even glass plates. His composition is built around the specific strengths and limitations of the media. I actually think some of these photos lost some impact by the addition of color since color photographs tend draw the viewers attention in different ways than black and white photographs do. Lets take the Churchill portrait as an example. I find my eye drawn to his left hand, something I never really noticed in the B&W version of the portrait, certainly trivial compared to the apparent expression of defiance on Churchill’s face (it was actually annoyance as the Photographer had snatched the cigar from Churchill to get his attention). Also, the image has been brightened considerably; in the original there is just a hint of a glow behind Churchill that in some way suggests England as being one of the sole lights against the Darkness that had spread across Europe. That impact is lost in the color photo where the glow has been expanded considerably.
From the perspective of a historical document, adding color often adds information that may be false to the actual history (such as hair and eye color, the color of structures or clothes).