I saw a rather cool series of photos from the B&W age which have been colorized. The colorized versions give an entirely different “feel” to the moment.
Get updates in your inbox
About this blog…
“This blog is like a fusion of the Baroque ‘salon’ with its well-tuned harpsichord around which polite society gathered for entertainment and edification and, on the other hand, a Wild West “saloon” with its out-of-tune piano and swinging doors, where everyone has a gun and something to say. Nevertheless, we try to point our discussions back to what it is to be Catholic in this increasingly difficult age, to love God, and how to get to heaven.” – Fr. Z
Coat of Arms by D Burkart
Recent Comments
- on ASK FATHER: Is the priesthood dominated by men who are varsity-level players or 3rd and 4th stringers?: “TonyB: I don’t make anything out Sheen’s defense of Chardin, since I haven’t read it or seen it. However, firstly,…”
- on Daily Rome Shot 1692: Farsighted Roman: “That is a French Book of Hours at the Morgan Library, containing the Hours of the Virgin and the Office…”
- on ASK FATHER: Is the priesthood dominated by men who are varsity-level players or 3rd and 4th stringers?: “You bring up Chardin, and I’m personally dubious about his theology, but what do you make of Ven. Fulton Sheen’s…”
- on PODCAST – Voices of the Fathers 05 – St. Jerome’s wide open spaces: “Thank you for this, Fr. Z. I appreciate the Latin even though my understanding is below rudimentary.”
- on Daily Rome Shot 1692: Farsighted Roman: “Black to move and mate in 4 1. … Qh3+ 2. Kg1 {or Bg2} Rxd1+ 3. Bxd1 {or Qf1} Re1+…”
- on ASK FATHER: Is the priesthood dominated by men who are varsity-level players or 3rd and 4th stringers?: “Someday, I would love to meet a priest who doesn’t use his education, his travels, and his office to make…”
- on ASK FATHER: Is the priesthood dominated by men who are varsity-level players or 3rd and 4th stringers?: “I agree that priests can excel in diverse areas and that prayerfulness and goodness are more important than brilliance. That…”
CLICK and say your daily offerings!
A Daily Prayer for Priests
Federated Computer… your safe and private alternative to big biz corporations that hate us while taking our money and mining our data. Have an online presence large or small? Catholic DIOCESE? Cottage industry? See what Federated has to offer. Save money and gain peace of mind.
ABORTION PILL RESCUE NETWORK
Everyone, work to get this into your parish bulletins and diocesan papers.
Donate using VENMO
GREAT BEER from Traditional Benedictine Monks in Italy
Good coffee and tea. Help monks.
I use this when I travel both in these USA and abroad. Very useful. Fast enough for Zoom. I connect my DMR (ham radio) through it. If you use my link, they give me more data. A GREAT back up.
Help support Fr. Z’s Gospel of Life work at no cost to you. Do you need a Real Estate Agent? Calling these people is the FIRST thing you should do!
They find you a pro-life agent in your area who commits to giving a portion of the fee to a pro-life group!
This blog has to earn its keep!
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful. Zelle and Wise are better, but PayPal is convenient.
A monthly subscription donation means I have steady income I can plan on. I put you my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I often say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
To donate monthly I prefer Zelle because it doesn't extract fees. Use
frz AT wdtprs DOT com
Watch out, Father. I remember a cartoon I saw once, I think originating in the New Yorker, with St Peter confronting a potential new candidate for Heaven at the Pearly Gates.
But St Peter is consulting the book and says, “You colorized Casablanca. How unfortunate.”
She’s very good! In the photo entitled “Union Soldiers Taking a Break 1863,” bottom right with the pooch is Lieutenant George Armstrong Custer with staff members of General Fitz-John Porter.
http://r2-store.distractify.netdna-cdn.com/postimage/201409/15/560e217553f6d93ed5efd20be09c22b5_650x.jpg
–Guy
The picture of Lou Gehrig (at the link) is heartbreaking. He only had two years to live.
oh those are amazing. thank you for posting these. They are simply beautiful. This is photojournalism I guess, a photo that so well captures an image or a moment it makes you feel it.
“Easter eggs for Hitler”, hehe.
Lincoln has a striking appearance, with or without color. The passing of Churchill marked the end of Britain as the model society, so that the nation has slipped from happy full-colour to sad greyness. The first image is certainly made more human by the addition of color.
Follow the link. The photos are simply captivating. I could study them all day and construct a different perspective of life decades or centuries ago.
Imagine color photographs from biblical times?
Lest some of the younger viewers be misled by the 1970 reference in the link, it should be stated that color photography was not all that unusual in earlier decades. Kodacolor was released for the mass market in 1942, I believe, and color photos start appearing in my family’s albums in 1948. (Sadly those originals are badly yellowed today.) But there are also examples of colorized photos very similar to those here dating from the 30’s and 40’s.
The thing that always bugs me about tinted or colorized photos is teeth (some shown at the link). Unless the subject has perfectly white teeth, they always show up gray. Whoever does this should at least give them a tinge of yellow.
The Napoleon poses are even better in color.
I appreciated this creative explanation of the history of color photography:
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2jg5c00&s=5#.VDplYtq9KSM
Wonderful technology.
I recall that many in the film industry oppose the digital “colorization” of classic black and white films, because the original art form had its own unique qualities (e.g., Who would dare to colorize Michelangelo’s Pieta?)
As always, the great Bill Watterson (“Calvin and Hobbes”) had his own explanation of why old photographs are always black and white:
http://stephen-coley.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/calvin-and-hobbes-dad-1.jpg
Calvin and Hobbes also sported this amusing reflection on “seeing things in terms of black and white”:
http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/1991/02/03
I’ve read somewhere that that was prompted by Watterson being accused of “having a black and white view of the issue” when fighting over the licensing and merchandise issue.
On-topic: That first one looks… so brown. I wonder what that scene looked like actually standing there? Maybe it was all that brown. Maybe the sunlight was more palpable. Yes, the sunlight was definitely more palpable — country that dry gets enough sun that it would have to be palpable; I would know, the palpability of the sunlight is one of the things that has struck me on my few and brief sojourns in southwest country.
I find the picture of Pres. Lincoln fascinating. His top hat, his long thin frame, the awkward stance next to the military officer.
His presence isn’t so much imposing as it is captivating.
(just noticed the minor photobomb by the soldier)
As for Churchill. If that face isn’t the definition of gravitas, I don’t know what is.
The Civil War photos as the least accurate of the bunch. The broad brimmed hats the officers are wearing should be black. For those who know, it’s jarring.
The one you posted with Lincoln looks like wax figures, particularly the biggest killer in American history. That would be Lincoln, in case anyone wonders; the man who stomped all over the Constitution, and set the stage for where we are today.
I am not a fan of colorizing old photos. Photographs are both works of art and historical documents. A good photographer knows his medium, whether it is a digital sensor, color or B&W film or even glass plates. His composition is built around the specific strengths and limitations of the media. I actually think some of these photos lost some impact by the addition of color since color photographs tend draw the viewers attention in different ways than black and white photographs do. Lets take the Churchill portrait as an example. I find my eye drawn to his left hand, something I never really noticed in the B&W version of the portrait, certainly trivial compared to the apparent expression of defiance on Churchill’s face (it was actually annoyance as the Photographer had snatched the cigar from Churchill to get his attention). Also, the image has been brightened considerably; in the original there is just a hint of a glow behind Churchill that in some way suggests England as being one of the sole lights against the Darkness that had spread across Europe. That impact is lost in the color photo where the glow has been expanded considerably.
From the perspective of a historical document, adding color often adds information that may be false to the actual history (such as hair and eye color, the color of structures or clothes).