"The great Father Zed, Archiblogopoios"
-
Fr. John Hunwicke
"Some 2 bit novus ordo cleric"
- Anonymous
"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."
- Kractivism
"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"
"Zuhlsdorf is an eccentric with no real consequences" -
HERE
- Michael Sean Winters
"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."
- Anna Arco
“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”
- Comment
"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."
- Sam Rocha
"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."
- Comment
"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."
- Anonymous
Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD
- Comment
Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.
- America Magazine
RC integralist who prays like an evangelical fundamentalist.
-Austen Ivereigh on
Twitter
[T]he even more mainline Catholic Fr. Z. blog.
-
Deus Ex Machina
“For me the saddest thing about Father Z’s blog is how cruel it is.... It’s astonishing to me that a priest could traffic in such cruelty and hatred.”
- Jesuit homosexualist James Martin to BuzzFeed
"Fr. Z's is one of the more cheerful blogs out there and he is careful about keeping the crazies out of his commboxes"
- Paul in comment at
1 Peter 5
"I am a Roman Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
I am a TLM-going Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
And I am in a state of grace today, in no small part, because of your blog."
- Tom in
comment
"Thank you for the delightful and edifying omnibus that is your blog."-
Reader comment.
"Fr. Z disgraces his priesthood as a grifter, a liar, and a bully. -
- Mark Shea
I would just use the software that comes with each camera. If you have four of the same webcams, just launch 4 of the webcam programs and direct each program to use a different webcam for its feed. The audio, unless built into the webcam, will pull either from the Mic or Line In (can be selected in the program itself) thus will be the same for all the webcams or you can have a set using the Line In and a set using the Mic. You will generate four different files and just edit them together using your video editing software.
Even if you get a specific suit of software to handle this issue, the real issue is going to be your computer’s processing power and hard disc read write speed.
Lurker: But then the audio track(s) is/are not in synch.
Father Z: You might consider VH Multicam Studio, which seems to fit what you need. I believe it is freeware.
Father: Do your webcams render through your video card or directly formatted as avi, mov, or similar?
Syncing multiple audio sources is not a big deal.. If you have any common reference..that is what the clap board is for in film and tv, to give the video and audio a common time reference. In most post production software, even some of the cheaper video editing software, the audio and video, both on a timeline, are able to slide forward or backwards along the timeline independently for sync…just match a common reference, a clap, for example. Read on as some of this may be moot anyway.
So, in that same regard, if computer/hard disk write speeds become an issue, you could record multiple sources to different computers, and just import the files to a single editing computer later. Not a big deal, especially if you are networked. Also, say you have four cameras viewing a single subject, well you don’t need four audio sources, just eliminate two or three, thus reducing sync and time lag issues.
Fr. Z.
What Patrick J. said. Having multiple video sources and audio sources will always necessitate syncing things up — which isn’t that hard even when having to do it by “tape”. If you have the processing power to have all the cams record audio as well as video everything will be in sync — it is only slightly tricky if you have to match audioless video files to a master audio track so that speech matches lip movement — just switch between cameras as you see fit in the editing process.
Even if you have Camera 1 + Audio 1 and Camera 2 + Audio 2 everything will sync because they are recording the same event. Just edit away.
I wonder what Fr. Roderick uses for ustream, he used to have 2 webcams on at the same time
Note that I was asking about doing this on a single computer.
I am not taking about the live stream on Ustream.
Fr. Z,
Well, you have a top end to what amount of streamed information, (data) your computer can keep up with in real time…hence my reference to multiple computers.
Also note, video resolution becomes an issue, lower rez, more streams handled. YMMV according to your computer speed and software, as well as Hard disk speed/write times..A fast computer with not to high rez on each video stream and good fast hard drive might yield your four video files, but you’d have to try it first and let it run for the hour or so you want to record. If that doesn’t work, split the work amongst more computers. Of course a few dedicated video cameras would probably be best, but you asked about web cams.
Patrick J. Right. I was thinking in terms of portability and speed of set up.