"The great Father Zed, Archiblogopoios"
-
Fr. John Hunwicke
"Some 2 bit novus ordo cleric"
- Anonymous
"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."
- Kractivism
"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"
"Zuhlsdorf is an eccentric with no real consequences" -
HERE
- Michael Sean Winters
"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."
- Anna Arco
“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”
- Comment
"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."
- Sam Rocha
"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."
- Comment
"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."
- Anonymous
Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD
- Comment
Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.
- America Magazine
RC integralist who prays like an evangelical fundamentalist.
-Austen Ivereigh on
Twitter
[T]he even more mainline Catholic Fr. Z. blog.
-
Deus Ex Machina
“For me the saddest thing about Father Z’s blog is how cruel it is.... It’s astonishing to me that a priest could traffic in such cruelty and hatred.”
- Jesuit homosexualist James Martin to BuzzFeed
"Fr. Z's is one of the more cheerful blogs out there and he is careful about keeping the crazies out of his commboxes"
- Paul in comment at
1 Peter 5
"I am a Roman Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
I am a TLM-going Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
And I am in a state of grace today, in no small part, because of your blog."
- Tom in
comment
"Thank you for the delightful and edifying omnibus that is your blog."-
Reader comment.
"Fr. Z disgraces his priesthood as a grifter, a liar, and a bully. -
- Mark Shea
From a reader…
Your use of my Amazon link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.
Loading ...
The English translation of the Italian word zucchetto was an educational opportunity: “small gourd”, from zucca, “pumpkin”. LOL.
I like the thought that Zuchetto is a rough cognate of zuchini, (Veg called, UK, baby marrows (marrers) in my day, or courgettes, more posh).
Yes I know, Italian diminuitives can carry very different connotations!
I am sure that somewhere in my Uk 50s altarboy instruction and practice the subject came up ….Everything did! We were supposed to be there for Father wherever, whoever he was and however ditto.It was an honour!
My guild of St Steven papers etc have turned up with my parents’ deaths , but in a tatterdemalion state, and we got a lot orally that wasn’t written, and were drilled in it , too!
I am sure 50s Uk we didn’t say zuchetto in the parishes I was in , but skullcap? Kepi? Surely not, except as an irreverent legpull?
Purely out of interest, does any wrinkly Brit less Alzheimeric than I am remember or know?
Apropo, again my exact memory fails, processions such as Palm Sunday’s , or Corpus Christi, seem less crisp in N.O than I remember prevatII, when there was definitely some followed rule as to what a processing priest should , and should not, be wearing, but beyond that my mind is blank.The rule might have been even recent diocesan or parish tradition, or older and wider Could it have included zuchetto?
Bring back the cassock, the maniple, and the biretta and many things would improve almost immediately.
Speaking of the zucchetto, I notice they seem to be coming in all sizes now. That is, from the small size that seems to precariously cling to the back of the skull (think Pius XII) to the large “limp pizza” style sported by our current holy father.
Also, pectoral crosses that were once safely affixed to a cassock button now, swing dangerously to and fro.
Ah well,the only machinery they are near is bureaucratic.
Enough of this serious musing. Now back to the Synod for lighter fare.
If my vestment has a maniple, I wear it in the OF. In fact, I have a great set of dalmatics that has maniples and if I wear a maniple, the deacon also does. I also wear gothic vestments for the EF and Roman vestments for the EF – I mix and match to give a sense of continuity between the two forms for the Roman Rite.
Isn’t the zuchetto really something like hat underwear from the point of view of its function and historical origins? Wouldn’t wearing a biretta without a zuchetto (or something similar to avoid direct contact between expensive fancy hat and greasy hair) have been somewhat unthinkable at one point in history?
I know a very solid priest who was firmly under the impression that as the rector of a diocesan shrine and pastor of a parish he was, given the state of present legislation, not doing anything explicitly illicit by wearing a black zuchetto within the church entrusted to his care. He had some arguments in favor of the practice that all sounded rather solid at the time, though I don’t recall what those were at the moment.
I once asked a priest about the maniple and its suitability for the OF. He told me that it is not worn in the OF so as to keep the two forms of the Mass from “bleeding into each other.” At the time I remember thinking “I thought that ‘bleeding into each other,’ as far as the external customs and underlying piety go, was the purpose of Summorum Pontificum.”
I’ve heard it questioned before that the maniple should not be worn, on account of it not being described in the missal or GIRM. Is there anywhere permission is given explicitly for it?
But anyone know how to use the maniple during the N.O. mass? When should the priest put it on and off?
[Put it on in the sacristy before Mass. Take it off in the sacristy after Mass. You can take it off before you preach if you wish, and put it on again afterward.]
@BenYanke: I’ve never seen a true permission for the wearing of the maniple in the Ordinary Form as you describe, but Tres Abhinc Annos (SCR, 1967) is where the maniple was deemed as optional. It states simply, “25. The maniple is no longer required.” Since the maniple is optional, there would be no need for permission, since its use was never abolished.
Furthermore, in a document (Studi dei Consultori) by the Office for the Liturgical Celebrations of the Supreme Pontiff (written after the 2008 IGMR was published) and titled “Liturgical Vestments and the Vesting Prayers”, the Office states: “5) The maniple is an article of liturgical dress used in the celebration of the extraordinary form of the Holy Mass of the Roman Rite. It fell into disuse in the years of the post-conciliar reform, even though it was never abrogated.”