"The great Father Zed, Archiblogopoios"
-
Fr. John Hunwicke
"Some 2 bit novus ordo cleric"
- Anonymous
"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."
- Kractivism
"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"
"Zuhlsdorf is an eccentric with no real consequences" -
HERE
- Michael Sean Winters
"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."
- Anna Arco
“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”
- Comment
"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."
- Sam Rocha
"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."
- Comment
"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."
- Anonymous
Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD
- Comment
Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.
- America Magazine
RC integralist who prays like an evangelical fundamentalist.
-Austen Ivereigh on
Twitter
[T]he even more mainline Catholic Fr. Z. blog.
-
Deus Ex Machina
“For me the saddest thing about Father Z’s blog is how cruel it is.... It’s astonishing to me that a priest could traffic in such cruelty and hatred.”
- Jesuit homosexualist James Martin to BuzzFeed
"Fr. Z's is one of the more cheerful blogs out there and he is careful about keeping the crazies out of his commboxes"
- Paul in comment at
1 Peter 5
"I am a Roman Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
I am a TLM-going Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
And I am in a state of grace today, in no small part, because of your blog."
- Tom in
comment
"Thank you for the delightful and edifying omnibus that is your blog."-
Reader comment.
"Fr. Z disgraces his priesthood as a grifter, a liar, and a bully. -
- Mark Shea
Such is the news from WGLT and the NatCathReg:
Loading ...
I think that this is a very good decision.
This just makes me sad. Sad because of the fighting and the hurt that brings, and sad because his legacy is as the Archbishop of New York, not as a son of Peoria.
[Sheen was an auxiliary bishop of New York and then Bishop of Rochester. After his resignation, he was named a titual Archbishop. He was not the Archbishop of New York.]
This all transpired rather quietly. I was under the impression that it had been definitively been decided that he remain in New York.
This is the right decision. It is just. It is in accord with agreement made between Peoria and New York when Peoria took up the work of the cause of Bishop Sheen. The agreement made by Cardinal Egan requires compliance. Of this there is no doubt.
Archbishop Sheen surely did not regard himself as a target for the Congregation of Saints, and his personal humility would supersede any attachment he had to New York City (which I share). From the perspective of Almighty God we are all buried on the head of a pin. To give Peoria the remains of its saintly son is a small price to pay in lieu of the scandal – and I use that word with purpose – which the Archdiocese has provided by going back on its word.
There are already some, and there will be, God willing, many saints to find a place at Saint Patrick Cathedral. Pierre Toussaint is already entombed in the Cathedral as well as Terrance Cardinal Cooke. Other causes under the wing of the Archdiocese are Mother Angeline Teresa, O.Carm., Dorothy Day and Mother Mary Alphonsa, O.P. (Rose Hawthorne).
Seems the Archdiocese unwillingness to adopt Archbishop Sheen’s cause was the result of having too many saints in the Big Apple?
Who knew?
Peoria might just have this one raised to the altars of all the multitude of its anonymous faithful gazing upon the Face of Almighty God.
And what a one he was!
About time. Unseemly spats like this give the whole process a bad name.
From everything I’ve read, a previous Archbishop of New York made life difficult for Bishop Sheen when he was alive. Has the present Archbishop of New York chosen to continue this legacy for Bishop Sheen after he is dead?
Just contemplating the irony.
“a previous Archbishop of New York”
Not just a previous Archbishop….Cardinal Spellman.
I’m glad for the outcome, but I am also am hesitant when a secular court is involved in church matters.
In case anyone is unaware, you can contact the Archbishop Fulton Sheen Foundation via mail, and they will send you a piece of his vestments in a nice card. Just write them and include a self addressed and stamped envelope. They do ask for a donation if you can, but it is by no means required.
I’m not sure if it’s OK to post a link, so I won’t post the url, but a internet search will pull up the foundation and their mailing address.