The 2007 Weblog Awards nominations are open until today, I think.
Perhaps WDTPRS should be involved? I noticed some rather odd sites nominated.
Fr. Z’s Podcasts RSS Feed
About this blog…
“This blog is like a fusion of the Baroque ‘salon’ with its well-tuned harpsichord around which polite society gathered for entertainment and edification and, on the other hand, a Wild West “saloon” with its out-of-tune piano and swinging doors, where everyone has a gun and something to say. Nevertheless, we try to point our discussions back to what it is to be Catholic in this increasingly difficult age, to love God, and how to get to heaven.” – Fr. Z
Coat of Arms by D Burkart
YOUR RECENT COMMENTS
- on Daily Rome Shot 1211: “White to move and mate in two. How fast can you do it? [NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till…”
- on Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2025: “RE: Fizzling From my limited vantage point, it seamed from the start that the Eucharistic Revival was one of those…”
- on Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2025: “Relative to the above is this at Crisis. Chicago: Where Eucharistic Revival Goes to Die I’m afraid that many dioceses…”
- on Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2025: “You are wrong about Israel destroying Hamas in Gaza. The resistance brigades are still attacking the Israeli invaders and even…”
- on Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2025: “Last year’s number 9 shows that if the Vatican really wants to keep something a secret, it can. It begs…”
- on Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2025: “There will be a Conclave and it will be the longest in history. Sotomayor will have to step down for…”
- on Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2025: “On #5, when the so-called wealth of the Church is brought up, I say the Vatican is like someone who…”
- on Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2025: “#9–Father, would you venture a guess whether this will have Vatican approval? Or will this repeat the aftermath of 1988?…”
- on Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2025: “The USCCB support of illegal immigration is wrong, but not because of the popular lack of support. Note that abortion…”
- on Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2025: “I think you will score 100 percent this year, which means unfortunately you won’t get the Mgr you deserve. However…”
- on Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2025: “Robert says: Eucharistic Revival fizzling Okay, you an another commentator have questioned this. Fair enough. On the other hand, has…”
- on Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2025: “amenamen says: “in pectore Yes, I am confident that I am a Monsignor in pectore. As a matter of fact,…”
- on Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2025: “I’m not sure I’d give you a +1 on the Eucharistic Revival fizzling. I have seen increased preaching on the…”
ABORTION PILL RESCUE NETWORK
Everyone, work to get this into your parish bulletins and diocesan papers.
Federated Computer… your safe and private alternative to big biz corporations that hate us while taking our money and mining our data. Have an online presence large or small? Catholic DIOCESE? Cottage industry? See what Federated has to offer. Save money and gain peace of mind.
I am an affiliate. Click and join or at least explore! If you join, I’ll get credit.
Polls
Loading ...Donate using VENMO
GREAT BEER from Traditional Benedictine Monks in Italy
CLICK and say your daily offerings!
A Daily Prayer for Priests
NEW OPPORTUNITY – 10% off with code: FATHERZ10
Fr. Z’s VOICEMAIL
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265
Good coffee and tea. Help monks.
I use this when I travel both in these USA and abroad. Very useful. Fast enough for Zoom. I connect my DMR (ham radio) through it. If you use my link, they give me more data. A GREAT back up.
Help support Fr. Z’s Gospel of Life work at no cost to you. Do you need a Real Estate Agent? Calling these people is the FIRST thing you should do!
They find you a pro-life agent in your area who commits to giving a portion of the fee to a pro-life group!
This blog has to earn its keep!
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful. Zelle and Wise are better, but PayPal is convenient.
A monthly subscription donation means I have steady income I can plan on. I put you my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I often say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
To donate monthly I prefer Zelle because it doesn't extract fees. Use
frz AT wdtprs DOT comPLEASE RESPOND. Pretty pleeeease?
Loading ...WDTPRS POLL
Loading ...Great WINE USE COUPON CODE: fatherz10
Use my code for a discount
Loading ...
I nominated your blog, Father.
It doesn’t matter who wins; WE know which one OUR favorite blog! :-))
Jack007
I think it is important that dependable Catholic blogs have a good showing.
Actually, Father, you are in 3rd place in the “Best Religion Blog” category!
Unfortunately, it has your old address:
http://www.bloggerschoiceawards.com/blogs/show/4131
You might be able to contact them, claim the blog, and update the links.
RS
Who’s voting for Fr. Z?
W D T P R S has just been bumped up to 2nd Place when I checked it just now.
Everyone: Kindly vote it you haven’t!
I just voted Father. However after voting I received a message indicating I did not use “comment authentication services??” Other people may be having similar problems. I have never seen this before and I am concerned that if today is the end of the voting
mine and perhaps other peoples votes may not be counted.
This is the message:
Thank you for commenting.
Since you did not use one of the available comment authentication services, your comment is being held for approval by moderators. Normally your comment will be approved within a few hours, but in some cases the delay can be up to 12 hours. Do not submit your comment again! Your comment will be approved (assuming it’s not spam or otherwise inappropriate) and posted shortly. To avoid this message in the future sign into the site with one of the supported authentication methods or register as a commenter. The Weblog Awards recommends MyOpenID for all your OpenID needs.
Return to the original entry.
Roman Sacristan is looking at a different blog award site (“Blogger’s Choice Awards”) than Fr. Z is citing (“Weblog Awards”).
There are probably several such operations going on, so I don’t put much stock in them: who’s to say that one or the other has substantial credibility?
Actually, people keep leaving duplicate comments to nominate Father.
The instructions say that one nomination is enough, and rather than leaving a “me too” comment, just use the + button to vote for the nomination you wish to vote for.
Seumas, thank you for the explaination. Hopefully everyone will go over there and vote.
Can anyone nominate a blog that opens up for debate the question of whether a *woman* can truly be a “Doctor of the Church” . . . with a straight face? How can such a blog even be taken seriously?
And, you wonder why chancery-folk look askance at Catholics who promote Latin and liturgy and ritual? Because their experience has been that those sorts of Catholics often harbor a pre-conciliar mentality of closemindedness and exclusion.
Fr. Z, you owe an apology for even raising that question.
And, you wonder why chancery-folk look askance at Catholics who promote Latin and liturgy and ritual? Because their experience has been that those sorts of Catholics often harbor a pre-conciliar mentality of closemindedness and exclusion.
It is certainly true that women are excluded from the priesthood.
Is it your opinion that Jesus Christ, in founding His Church with a male priesthood, “harbored a pre-conciliar mentality of closedmindedness and exclusion?” – And do those same chancery-folk look askance at Our Lord for that reason?
Matthew: Fr. Z, you owe an apology for even raising that question.
Piffle.
People now understand a great deal more about the issue now, and what sort of fellow Williamson is.
I think Bp Williamson raised a very interesting question. Having said that, I disagree with his conclusion and think he has not understood the article from the Summa that he cited.
*Piffle.
People now understand a great deal more about the issue now, and what sort of fellow Williamson is.*
Since you already identified him as an excommunicate, you made clear what sort of fellow he is.
The problem is this: You *seriously* entertained his argument, even noting that he had a point with his citation of the scripture from St. Paul.
To even raise the question of whether a woman, a f-eee-male, could be a Doctor of the Church is simply stupefying — which only reinforces the stereotype that those who are conservative about the liturgy are also conservative (in a bad way) about other issues.
Any wonder why chancery-folk are trying to minimize the effect of “Summorum Pontificum”? They think that such narrow attitudes go hand-in-glove with the Old Mass.
Piffle?
I guess, your next debate will be whether the indigenes of South America have souls and should be baptized . . . or, do not and should be enslaved. Discuss.
Roman Sacristan is looking at a different blog award site (“Blogger’s Choice Awards”) than Fr. Z is citing (“Weblog Awards”).
Ooops. Sorry. Completely missed that.
Matthew: I guess, your next debate will be whether the indigenes of South America have souls and should be baptized . . . or, do not and should be enslaved. Discuss.
Okay… here we go.
That’s just dumb and you’ve missed the point. See ya!