QUAERITUR: Extraordinary Ministers of Hospitality

From a reader:

I read an article about an African Mass. Apparently the Mass is the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite with African inculturations. Included in the entry procession are Extraordinary Ministers of Hospitality. The article did not state what an Extraordinary Minister of Hospitality is. I have never heard of the position and cannot find an article on it. I found an article on Hospitality Ministers. If you have time for an answer, I would be grateful.

Some years ago I attended in Rome a conference on liturgy and sacred music.  One of the panelists was a Cardinal from Africa (not Card. Arinze).  Someone asked him when we might see an African rite. His Eminence was amused.  He responded that in his country alone there were hundreds of languages, each language reflecting a culture.  On the other hand, Latin was useful for bringing people together.

So, I have no idea what an African Mass is.

As far as what an “Extraordinary Ministers of Hospitality” would be… I am at a loss.  The extra… ushers?  Collection takers?  Another way to describe Extraordinary Ministers of Communion?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
19 Comments

Airman won’t support same-sex marriage, punished by commandrix

Watching the signs of the times!

From Breitbart:

CHRISTIAN AIRMAN PUNISHED BY LESBIAN COMMANDER FACES POSSIBLE COURT MARTIAL

Updating our earlier report on Senior Master Sergeant Phillip Monk, a Christian serving in the Air Force whose unit is now commanded by a lesbian: according to Monk’s complaint filed with his superiors, he was relieved of duty for refusing his commander’s order to say he supports gay marriage.
Now the Air Force has taken the first steps to criminally investigate Monk for talking to the media about his situation. Despite the fact that earlier this year the Obama-Hagel Pentagon said they would never court-martial a service member for their Christian faith, they have taken the first steps to possibly court-martial Monk.
[…]

On Monk’s situation, Gen. Boykin says:
We now see what is happening to Christians under President Obama and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel. This appears to be an intimidation tactic to send a message to other Christians in the military that you better not speak up when we violate your religious liberty. A statement to the media is not an official statement, so it’s absurd to consider charging him with this crime. The Obama-Hagel military leadership is not officially court-martialing Christians for sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ, but you will be punished and might even face a court martial if you stand by the principles of your Christian faith when you are serving in uniform.
A court martial is a criminal prosecution in the military. Depending on the crime, punishments can range from reduction in rank and withholding pay to dishonorable discharge from the military or even imprisonment.
Boykin said FRC and the coalition is collecting signatures for a petition to the secretary of the Air Force, calling upon him not to punish Sergeant Monk for refusing to compromise his Christian beliefs.

Posted in Liberals, One Man & One Woman, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , ,
12 Comments

Next years’s LCWR Assembly Speaker chosen already?

A while back I opined (HERE) about the LCWR assembly speakers:

How do we explain the antics of the LCWR nuns?

I have the impression that – and mothers can correct me about the right age for this sort of thing – I have the impression that the sisters are rather like 13-year-olds right now.  They push and push at the boundary of what is acceptable (acceptable for the Holy See, that is, from whom they crave approval). …

It is as if their leadership is saying: How weird can we be before something snaps?

In the last couple years their keynote speakers have talked about the “noosphere,” “cosmo genesis,” synergistic convergence” and “Christification.” They have talked about “There is no cosmos without God, and no God without cosmos.”

This report is just in from the Eye of the Tiber:

The Dark Lord Sauron To Head Upcoming LCWR Annual Assembly

MORDOR––Sister Florence Deacon announced today that the upcoming annual assembly for the Leadership Conference of Women Religious would be taking place at the smoldering base of Mount Doom in Mordor, and would be lead by the Dark Lord Sauron. The announcement came in a joint statement between LCWR leaders and numerous well know officials from the lands surrounding Mordor including Azog the Defiler, Uruk-hai Scout Captain Ugluk, Orc Captain of the Warg Rider Sharku, and President of LCWR Carol Zinn. LCWR and Mordor leaders would not comment on the specifics of the upcoming conference except to say that they were eagerly anticipating the conference, which would focus on the ongoing situation with the Vatican. “We shall soon celebrate the dawn of a new era!” Zinn shouted to tens of thousands of cheering Orcs and LCWR nuns as they all furiously, mindlessly slammed their spears against their shields in unison, over and over again. Zinn went on to conclude her rousing speech, shouting, “One conference to rule us all! No habits to bind us! No veil to blind us! And with liberation at our helm shall they be defied!”

Fr. Z is skeptical.  Sauron’s policies don’t seem environmentally friendly.

Posted in Lighter fare, Magisterium of Nuns, Women Religious | Tagged , , ,
22 Comments

“I never realize how cool wars could be until…”

Ah!  Dear Leader!

 

Posted in Liberals, Lighter fare | Tagged , , ,
18 Comments

How the Catholic Left will support Pres. Obama’s attack on Syria.

I was going to write it, but over at CatholicVote (keep praying for Thom Peters’ complete recovery!), Matt Bowman beat me to it with a great look into the wacky world of the Fishwrap‘s (aka National Schismatic Reporter) support of Pres. Obama’s impending attack on Syria.

Yes, you read that.

HOW NCREPORTER LEARNED TO LOVE THE BOMB
BY MATT BOWMAN

The U.S. Bishops are urging Catholics to contact Congress to oppose President Obama’s desire to bomb Syria.

Pope Francis is insisting that more bombing is not an answer.

Even Jon Stewart (explicit content warning) doesn’t hesitate to call President Obama’s bomb proposal absurd.

But pundits of the Catholic Left can’t muster up the courage to unequivocally oppose their Democratic president’s bomb-mongering.

The National Catholic Reporter’s Michael Sean Winters has written a meandering screed supporting Obama. He doesn’t even mention the Pope, or the Bishops, much less rebut their statements. Can you imagine Winters failing to mention Pope Francis and the U.S. Bishops if they called for action on any other issue such as immigration, guns, or for that matter a Republican-instigated war?

On the NCReporter’s main page, it has forgotten how to plainly condemn bombing. It lists some articles in favor of the bishops’ view, yet at the same time it hosts what can only be called a “diversity” of views on the topic.

In addition to Winters, NCReporter’s exclusive Jesuit “analyst” Fr. Thomas Reese wrings his hands about whether more bombs should be dropped. Fr. Reese cannot muster simple condemnation of more bombs. Reese prominently features the thoughts of William Galston, who offers a variety of justifications for the president.

So when Pope Francis, the Vatican, and the U.S. Bishops criticize Republican-led wars, or capitalist economics, pundits on the Catholic Left treat their messages as ex cathedra doctrine. When these same Catholic bishops strenouously oppose President Obama’s desire to drop bombs on Syria, Catholic Left pundits start to wonder if bombs aren’t so bad after all. [I wonder what Sr. Simone thinks?  Sr. Keehan? Sr. Chittister?  The LCWR?]

I don’t remember NCReporter hosting bloggers who defended dropping bombs in Iraq, or offered pro-waterboarding “moral voices,” or theological defenses of nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

[…]

Read the rest over there.

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Liberals, Magisterium of Nuns, The Drill | Tagged , , , , , ,
67 Comments

Fr. Z stands with Fr. Blake of Brighton – UPDATES

Originally Published on: Sep 7, 2013 @ 15:17

My friend Fr. Ray Blake, parish priest of St. Mary Magdalen in Brighton, England, was treated shamefully by a malicious newsie for a thoughtful, serious, introspecive piece he wrote on his blog about the poor.

Fr. Blake’s piece HERE.  Take a look at it.  It is engaging and compelling.

A write for The Argus in Brighton, Bill Gardner, picked up Father’s blog entry and twisted it.  The writer for the Daily Mail, Will Robinson, also picked it up to pick on it.  Robinson either has no critical reading skills (which seems to be pandemic among journalists), or he is simply a bigot.  Wills twisted what Fr. Blake wrote about how difficult it can be to work with the poor (Father provided examples that could vex a saint) and about recognizing his own complacency.

I’ll let Fr. Finigan take over from here.  Check out everything he has to say over at his place.  HERE

Fr Ray Blake wrote a characteristically thoughtful and provocative post about the poor who turn up on his doorstep in Brighton. His article challenges romantic notions about the poor by detailing some of his experiences of the reality of helping poor people – which he does with heroism. He has to cope with lies, nuisance and mess, but his point he makes is that rather than become complacent, we must let the poor mess up our lives.

Enter Bill Gardner, journalist for The Argus in Brighton who writes a stupid article portraying Fr Blake as though he were simply attacking the poor. Fr Blake has replied in spirited fashion, inviting Mr Gardner to come and help with one or other of the projects that St Mary Magdalen’s runs for the poor. (See, for example his thoughtful article on Soup Runs.) The Daily Mail has also run another stupid article in the same vein as Bill Gardner.

[…]

Unfortunately there are some journalists who are not particularly interested in getting a genuinely good story but simply concerned to impress their editor with something that will look sensational enough to help sales of the paper. The Argus-Mail take on Fr Ray looks like an example of Dumb and Dumber, but realistically we have to say that it is simply malicious, unprincipled and a disgrace to a profession that labours under public criticism. I imagine that principled and honest journalists must be cursing those who sully their profession with the kind of rubbish that Fr Ray has been subjected to.

Fr. Z Kudos to Fr. Blake!

Please read his blog entry and then add a comment of support.

UPDATE Sunday 8 Sept 15:37 GMT:

Fr. Blake has posted his own response to the “unscrupulous journalist” (I prefer “low-information hack”) who trashed him in Brighton’s paper in an article that has gone viral.

Good for Fr. Blake.  I still stand with him.

UPDATE Monday 9 Sept 17:52 GMT:

Here is a good take on what the malicious newsies did to Fr. Blake. HERE

A sample:

Here’s the truth as I see it. Having known this priest for five years I can confirm that the poor are more than welcome at his parish; his tolerance is almost limitless. Fr Ray runs a soup kitchen for the homeless in the evenings and if people ring his bell at all hours of the day then it’s probably because he almost always answers it. If he has a politics, I’d call it Christian Socialist – in that Old Labour, community activism kind of way; copies of Tribune, rosaries for peace etc. And, being a priest in Brighton, he not only serves gays and lesbians (without a second thought) but also the large contingent of homeless people who are drawn to its admirable local support network. A great number of them suffer from drug addiction and mental illness; these are not the cap-doffing tramps of some Victorian novel but people with real problems that would test the patience of a Saint. In other words, Fr Ray actually has to confront on a daily basis the kinds of challenges that liberal journalists and politicians only talk about in the abstract. If he says that the poor can be difficult, he’s not being nasty. He’s being honest.

UPDATE Monday 9 Sept 1950 GMT:

It seems that Bp. Kieran Conry of Arundel and Brighton (where Fr. Blake is, of course) did an interview on the Beeb and made a statement about Fr. Blake’s controverted blog post.

UPDATE Tuesday 10 Sept 14:28 GMT:

It seems that Fr. Blake’s bishop, Most Rev. Kieran Conry was interviewed on the Beeb and apologized for Fr. Blake.

Bp. Conry should have read Fr. Blake’s blog first.  What a shame.

For more go HERE.

Does anyone have a transcript?

UPDATE Friday 13 Sept 23:57

Fr. Blake is angry.  He is understandably angry.

I have just been out shopping and was talking to ‘an occassional’ parishioner who has a few problems and one of my regular crack addicts came past, we chatted very briefly, he was obviously in a hurry, she was rather disgusted by him and said, ‘I thought you hated people like that, he is disguting ….’ I told her off of course and asked how she had formed that opinion of me, she had been reading the Brighton Argos.

I am so angry, they have really trashed my reputation, it hurts, and I am angry and it hurts my parishioners.

If you read the Argus’ unscrupulous journalist Bill Gardner’s twitter account he revels in his animus against me not I think because it is me nor because I am clergyman, ‘a vicar’, no, it is because I am a ‘Catholic priest’, it seems quite apparent this is an anti-Catholic thing, from his point of view at least. His stories, however, have been approved by his editor. Gardner informed me my blog was often discussed in the Argus Office.
Here is one extract from his Twitter account, […]

Read the rest there.

I also saw this at Mulier Fortis and That The Bones You Have Crushed May Thrill:

 

 

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Green Inkers, Liberals, Priests and Priesthood, The Drill, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , ,
19 Comments

“Where you can’t have a cellphone but you can have a gun.”

From the Cardinal Newman Society (see their feed on my sidebar):

Wyoming Catholic College is in the news recently because of its on-campus cell phone ban for students.

The ban, which has been in place since the founding of the faithful Catholic college, has all of a sudden become the focus of dozens of news organizations as diverse as YahooNews,The Malaysia Sun and Fox Philadelphia.

But as long ago as 2007, Inside Higher Ed wrote a piece on the cell phone ban with the lede, “Don’t try reaching a Wyoming Catholic College student by cell. Students can’t have cell phones on campus – a donated cattle ranch in western Wyoming’s Wind River Mountain Range – or in the surrounding towns.”

But perhaps the idea of living without a phone has become so unthinkable in recent years, that the fact that the Catholic college hasn’t changed, is, in fact, newsworthy.

[…]

Go see the rest of the piece over there!  That is, use the link on the sidebar.

Also, click that link to Wyoming Catholic College, also on my sidebar.

Remember the photo I took when I was at a conference in Phoenix?  I visited the booth of WCC and saw this:

Posted in Just Too Cool, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , , ,
3 Comments

Ain’t it da trut?

Isn’t this about right?

Posted in Lighter fare |
17 Comments

QUAERITUR: New bishop against Traditional Latin Mass, persecutes priests.

From a reader (edited):

I just read your post about a group approaching the local ordinary for the Latin Mass wherein you recommend skipping this step and going directly to (able and) willing priests. We here in the diocese … have done that, hoping the situation would be more promising now that [the previous bishop] is retired. Well, his successor is no better, and the priests I’ve talked to who are deeply interested in the traditional Mass … are afraid to offer it on their own initiative for fear of “repercussions” from the Bishop. I don’t know what that would entail. If its banishment to the sticks, that already happened when they received their latest assignments. What can I tell these priests? I’m just a layman, so I know my perspective is skewed on this point, but I can’t imagine any penalty outweighing the opportunity to celebrate the traditional liturgy. Please help! Any word of advice is welcome.

First, Summorum Pontificum is the law of the land. We can and should use its provisions.   Bishops can’t repress Summorum Pontificum.

As I have written before, we have the provisions, we have the vision. It is time to take the training wheels off and ride the damn bike!

Going on, everyone who is interested in the old forms, priests and laity alike, must get involved with corporal works of mercy. Be involved. If you are involved, be more involved.

Moreover, be prudent in the way you talk and act toward ecclesial authority when trying to obtain what you want. Be cordial, not aggressive, joyful rather than defensive. Trads can be their own worst enemy.

On a different level, persevere and resist oppression. Be the Maquis!

If your local bishop is hostile or indifferent, or the chancery people are (which is the more likely scenario), then sneak around them. Get to know priests who want these good and holy things and give them private support. Get materials into the hands of priests. Pay for them to get training. Pony up so they can travel to a workshop for their “retreat” and “continuing education” and “vacation”. Organize ad hoc or even private Masses if need be.

You may have to be maquisards in your diocese for a while.

Please pardon me while I continue to mix a bunch of metaphors.

It is often said that every diocese has a Siberia. Priests have to be willing to go to Siberia and people will have to be willing to dog-sled there. Siberia isn’t the only downside of what a hostile bishop can do to a priest. There is a phrase I learned from the “Fat Man’s Rules” in The House of God: They can always hurt you more.

We have to be willing to be hurt a lot more.

We are in a transition period right now. The deck is shifting beneath our feet as the winds shift. The wind isn’t on our best quarter any longer, I’m afraid. It’s backing and we are going to have batten down and run before the wind under close-reefed top-sails. Committed ideological liberals are emboldened right now. They think they have the big mo.  They are sending the fleet out.  They are going to try to dismantle everything Benedict ever did and a lot of what John Paul II did too. The liberal-tepids, seeing the way the wind is blowing, will follow them. To use more nautical imagery, they have the weather gauge and they will eat the wind from our sails if we aren’t diligent and smart. Moderate conservatives will drift towards them. We can see it happening already, even in the blogosphere. What we need, however, is hard-identity Catholicism. That means traditional forms and teachings. Alas, liberals have everyone convinced that only liberals care for the poor. In the book I just read on Francis (HERE), the author’s starting point was that conservative/traditionalists don’t care about “the poor”. It is a premise they simply expect everyone to accept without question. This trope is going to be ever on their lips and pens and keyboards in the foreseeable future.

So, perhaps we need two tracks. We have to press on and persevere: drive forward and use those provisions in law which Benedict put in place.  At the same time, correct the course and defeat every liberal accusation flung in your teeth (“conservatives hate the poor… all traddies are bilious and angry… traditionalists don’t participate in the life of the parish… this is only nostalgia…” blah blah blah…).

Do NOT give up for a minute. We have the provisions of law and we have the inspiration of both Francis and Benedict. We will not be guilty of pitting the one Pope against the other. Claim for yourselves hard-identity Catholicism and true concern for works of mercy. If there is a lack of focus also… also… on works of mercy, then apply correctives. The Francis Phenomenon and his call for a greater focus on “the poor”, is in no way harmful. But be ready: liberals will use “the poor” as a weapon against all things Benedictine or traditional (e.g., “the poor” respond only to flappy-happy easily understood worship).  Here’s an idea: traditionalists should create alliances with and reach out to the Hispanic community!  Create common bonds and unity within our common liturgical tradition that doesn’t favor.  As I look around, in these USA the traditional movement looks pretty “anglo”.

True Catholic identity includes true ecumenism, true inculturation, true “preferential option for the poor”, true charisms and prophetic evangelization. It has to include, as a sine qua non, true sacred liturgical worship.

Here is a take away point: Hard-identity Catholicism is not just about what form Sunday Mass is in. It involves all of life. Use this time of transition to develop a new sail plan and course corrections.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Francis, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liberals, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged
48 Comments

QUAERITUR: How to obtain more celebrations of the TLM in the diocese? Holy “lío”!

From a reader:

As you know on 30 April 2011 the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei issued the instruction Universae Ecclesiae of 30 April 2011, to clarify some aspects of Summorum Pontificum.

The two sections of this document that are of interest to our local Una Voce chapter are provided below:

21. Ordinaries [in general, diocesan bishops] are asked to offer their clergy the possibility of acquiring adequate preparation for celebrations in the forma extraordinaria. [In Latin: Ordinarii enixe rogantur… Ordinaries are strenuously asked…  The adverb enixe is from enitor which has to do with “to force one’s way out or up” as in climbing a mountain or as in giving birth to a child.] This applies also to Seminaries, where future priests should be given proper formation, including study of Latin[8] and, where pastoral needs suggest it, the opportunity to learn the forma extraordinaria of the Roman Rite.

22. In Dioceses without qualified priests, Diocesan Bishops can request assistance from priests of the Institutes erected by the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, either to the celebrate the forma extraordinaria or to teach others how to celebrate it.

In the past the Traditional Latin mass when offered in our diocese has been on an ad hoc basis. That is on the initiative of an individual priest who is interested in saying the Latin Mass and takes the time to learn to say it.

It is desired that a more organized and integrated approach to the celebration of the Traditional Latin Mass be instituted in our diocese based on the application of UE 21 and/or UE 22  [Desired by whom?  The local bishop?  I assume this means that the Una Voce group desires it.]

Our Una Voce group (and I suspect other readers) would be interested to hear your thoughts on how to best bring these ideas forward to our local bishop. Be assured of our continued prayers for you in your ministry to the Church.

First, thanks for the prayers.  I need them.

One of the things that people hear from bishops when they ask for more (or one) opportunities to attend the Extraordinary Form is that “there are no priests available” or “all the priests are busy”, etc.

The first mistake was going to the bishop for this.  According to Summorum Pontificum, pastors of parishes can make this decision without the permission of the bishop.  People keep making this mistake.

So, my advice is that you identify several priests in the area who are willing to say or learn to say the older form.  Ideally, they will be the pastors of parishes, rather than assistants who have no power.

Then, make sure that they have all the training and materials they need.

Then, once everything is copasetic, start gathering what can be seen as a stable group, as described in Summorum Pontificum  5 § 1 and UE 15.  Note: A stable group doesn’t have to be of persons at just one parish or in its boundaries, etc.

Then, talk to the pastors about getting the Mass on the schedule in a regular time slot in the target parishes.

If this is not possible, then find some location where the priest is amenable.  Remember: You already have identified your pool of priest celebrants.  Even if you must eventually involve the local bishop, you still have a group of priests who are ready to help, thus taking that excuse off the table.

I always think that organizing this within the diocese is the best first step.  Only if it can’t be done with priests from the diocese should you start thinking about trying to get to bishop to allow one of the specialized groups to come in, which is complicated.

However, even though I started with the identification of priests, the real first step is the identification and commitment of the lay people who are going to have to do all the work and pay all the bills.  A great deal can be accomplished by a few people who will commit their time, talent and treasure to a project.  A great example of this is what has been going on in New York City at Holy Innocents in Manhattan.  There, a small group with drive eventually brought about a daily TLM at the parish, often a Missa Cantata with excellent music.  They even started Sunday Vespers in the afternoon.  The key, the sine qua non, was the dedication of the lay people, then the creation of the pool of celebrants, the supplying of all the materials, and the wooing of the pastor.

If you eventually have to get permissions from clerics, then make sure beforehand that the decks are entirely cleared for action for and aft, that the shot lockers are full and that the slow match is lit and smoking in the tubs.  Which you’ll then be able to deal with any maneuver or broadside and respond at close range with your boarding party when the time is right.

Sorry, I channelled my inner Preserved Killick for a moment.

Be far more cordial and pleasant than Preserved Killick ever was!  Had it not been for his singular talent in making excellent coffee he’d have been back in regular duties in a trice.

Now, back to your point about Universae Ecclesiae stating that “ordinaries are strenuously asked” to provide training and help for priests.

Realistically, most bishops are going to blow this off.  It isn’t on their radar screen.  Again, they will say that there is no interest.  They will say there is no time.  They will say that there is no budget.  They will say, perhaps, nothing, and ignore you.  That’s most bishops.

Therefore, you have to take the advice of Pope Francis and take matters into your own capable hands.  Frankly, lay people are better at completing projects than priests and bishops are anyway.  You need to create some holy “lío” as Pope Francis talked about in Rio.  Create a ruckus.  In this case, however, I don’t mean protest, though that would also be great.  I mean take matters into your own hands, get all the resources together and then be of service to the bishop in fulfilling his responsibilities according to Universae Ecclesiae.  When he says “There is no interest!”, be ready with the list of the stable group.  “There are no priests!”,… well, bring them to the meeting.  “There is no budget!”, get out your check book and show him a budget for bringing in a priest from St. John Cantius or the FSSP to do the training for several priests at the same time.

Be ready for every objection.  Anticipate and plan.

After every meeting, write a summary note back to the bishop so that you have a record, in writing of what happened.  Keep copies of everything in case, one day, you have to write to the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei”.

You also need to approach this on a spiritual level.  Get as many people as you can to commit to praying for this, for fasting for it.  Ask your guardian angels to hang out with the priests and the bishop whom you have to get on board.  Invoke St. Joseph, if need be to help according to the now famous Bux Protocol.  Ask Pope Francis’ favorite Mary, Undoer of Knots – who is also Queen of the Clergy – to help.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, O'Brian Tags, Preserved Killick, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices, Universae Ecclesiae | Tagged , , , , ,
20 Comments