ASK FATHER: How to obtain a traditional parish?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

What, if anything, can I do to bring about the establishment of an FSSP led parish in my community? The parishes in my county are all post-Vatican II. Can one person do anything? Thank you!

Only a bishop can establish a parish. That’s part of his job description. Only he can invite in a religious community, like the FSSP, to staff a parish.

However, there’s much that we all can do.

First, Be the Maquis!  Start participating fully in the life of your local parish. Get active in any way you can, especially with works of charity and service. Get to know the people at the parish.  Get to know like-minded Catholics in the area. Is there a Juventutem chapter in your state? Join it. Sign up to it’s websites and keep apprised of all activity. There probably are others in your immediate area who also would like easier access to the Extraordinary Form of the Mass and the Sacraments.

Next, keep at it. Don’t necessarily make it the first question you ask when you join your local parish, especially if there’s a long history of heterodoxy or bland liturgy there. Join in, worship God, find like-minded folks, and when you’ve found about forty or fifty solidly committed friends, ask the pastor if he’d be willing to offer, or at least host, an Extraordinary Form Mass.

Network with others through the internet who have gone through this process in the past.

Always be upbeat and positive, always look for ways that you can make your pastor’s life easier. He needs to learn to think of you and your like-minded friends as an asset to the parish, rather than a headache.

If twenty of the fifty people who are asking for an Extraordinary Form Mass are the backbone of the parish’s food pantry, or if the men who are involved are the ones who just volunteered to repaint the parish hall (and pay for the paint!), even a pastor disinclined to offer the EF Mass himself might be more inclined to make some allowances.

On the other hand, if the fifty people asking for the EF Mass are the fifty people who are always calling and complaining about something, or who collectively contribute $20 a week in the offertory, Father is not going to be easily persuaded or accommodating.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Be The Maquis, Si vis pacem para bellum!, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices |
21 Comments

ASK FATHER: Validity of schismatic priests’ ordination

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I was wondering if the ordinations of priests and bishops in schismatic and or sedevacantist groups valid? They would be such priests like “Fr.” Anthony Cekeda and “pope” Michael and groups like the Congregation of Mary, Immaculate Queen, etc. Also, are their Masses and sacraments valid, too?

An ordination of a man capable of being ordained (e.g., a man who is free of any impediment to Holy Orders) performed by a validly ordained bishop, who intends to ordain a sacrificing priest according to the mind of the Church, and who uses the correct form for the ordination, is assumed to be valid.

We should not look upon Apostolic Succession merely as some sort of a communicable disease. At some point, the right order of the Church required that the intention of the ordaining prelate be weighed in a balance with his proximity to the Church of Jesus Christ.

Many schismatics and sedevacantists trace their ordination lineage (or pedigree, if you will) back through some pretty strange folks.

Arnold Harris Mathew, for example, who claimed to be the Earl Landaff of Thomastown and Count Povoleri was a baptized Roman Catholic man who was ordained a priest in 1877, who apostasized in 1889, then became an Anglican, married, reconciled with the Catholic Church in 1892 (but continued to officiate at Anglican weddings without a license), left the Church again to be ordained as a bishop of the Old Catholic Church (which has putatively valid orders), left the Old Catholic Church and began ordaining several men to the priesthood and episcopate under his own authority, was formally excommunicated vitandus by St. Pius X in 1911, who described him as a “pseudo-bishop” in his decree, was formally excommunicated by the Anglican Church in 1913. In August 1911, he was received into the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch by a patriarchal legate, who did not have the authority to receive him. Towards his death in 1919, he petitioned Rome for reconciliation, but was informed that he would only be received “quasi laicus“, as a layman. He then tried to reconcile with the Anglican Church instead, but the Archbishop of Canterbury similarly refused to recognize him as a priest, let alone a bishop. He died in 1919 and was buried out of the local Anglican parish.

Specific to the ones you mention, Fr Anthony Cekeda is undeniably a validly ordained priest, though he is not in communion with the Catholic Church. He had been a member of the Society of St. Pius X, left that in 1983 to help form the Society of St. Pius V, then left that group in 1989 (but did not, as many were expecting, form the Society of St. Pius 2.5). He remains, technically, a vagus, that is, a priest without allegiance to any hierarchical superior but himself, though he is involved with Bishop Donald Sanborn, who traces his pedigree back to Archbishop Thuc, formerly of Hue, Vietnam.  Thuc ordained four men bishops during his retirement, though he did not have a papal mandate to do so.  (BTW… the Holy See often receives men ordained through bishops of the Thuc line “ut laicus
.)

Regarding David Bawden, who calls himself “Pope Michael”, there is no available information regarding his ordination. Until proof is forthcoming, he should be presumed to be a layman. He is certainly not in communion with Rome.

The “bishop” of the CMRI traces his pedigree back to Arnold Harris Mathew, whose checkered life is outlined above.

Judging the validity of some of these schismatics’ ordinations is complicated business. It should best be left to the proper authorities (that is, the Holy Father or someone he delegates). In the meantime, the faithful should steer far away from those who’ve willfully separated themselves from Our Holy Mother, the Church.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged ,
21 Comments

ASK FATHER: Annulment after an SSPX wedding

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I understand the position of the Church is the SSPX has no jurisdiction.  However, I just recently became aware of a friend from college who was “married” in front of a SSPX Priest (without permission or jurisdiction), and yet, there was an annulment that went through the full Court of Second Instance. It was granted on the basis of inability to consummate.

The funny thing is, this was treated as if it were a putative marriage, and accepted that way by the Church.  There was no sanatio associated with it at any point.

Again … we have to be careful with the language we use about declarations of nullity.

The Church does not “grant” an annulment as if it’s something positive that’s either given or withheld based on some list of circumstances. A declaration of nullity is more like a medical diagnosis: the facts are examined by experts, who, to the best of their ability, make a determination of the situation.

Like a medical diagnosis, there can be a number of possible explanations. Those examples might not be mutually exclusive.

For example, you are coughing up blood.  People who have TB cough up blood and, on that basis diagnosis could be that you have TB.  On the other hand, people who have typhus cough up blood too.  But wait!  What’s this?  You also have a sucking gunshot wound in your chest? Maybe that’s it!

However, it’s possible that all three diagnoses were correct, you have TB and typhus and a gunshot wound in the chest.

Similarly, a marriage might be null and void because one of the parties withheld an essential element of marriage at the time of consent (e.g., she simulated consent about exclusive fidelity), or because the other party was incapable of true consent (e.g., because of a seriously abusive childhood, he was simply not mature in the area of relationships to make a free choice for marriage), or because the priest who officiated at the wedding lacked the necessary faculties to marry them.

It’s quite possible that all three things, each of which would result in a declaration of nullity, are true.

Without knowing all the details of the case you provide, there may have been a number of reasons why the Tribunal proceeded the way it did. Since we are looking at this from the outside, it’s probably best not to speculate too much.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, One Man & One Woman, SSPX | Tagged , , ,
5 Comments

ASK FATHER: Can I attend an invalid SSPX wedding?

From a reader…

ok — so I get that according to cannon law, since sspx marriages are not “canonically approved’, they are not valid. My God- daughter, and my CLOSEST friend’s daughter is getting married in the fall by an sspx priest. She is the oldest of 13 children, takes her faith wildly seriously AS DO ALL OF HER SIBLINGS!! The whole family is a true inspiration to Catholic parenthood. Question: CAN WE ATTEND the wedding??? Thank you for any efforts to ease my terrified heart!!

Okay… no need to SHOUT or freak out!!?!?!

Marriage, which can only be contracted between one genetically born man and one genetically born woman, is a public covenant. It has profound significance for society. It is basically the first building block of society. It’s important, therefore, that we get it right.

For Catholics, marriage has even more importance.   Between baptized persons, marriage is a sacrament. It is a sign of Christ’s love for His Church and of His abiding presence.

Because marriage is such an important public act, the Church has an interest in protecting it.

For Catholics, marriage requires exchanging consent in the presence of an authorized, official witness (usually a bishop, priest, or a deacon with the required delegation). It is an argument for another day whether or not this requirement should be retained, but for now, it is a requirement.  Anyway, I am not making this up: to be valid, marriages have to be conducted according to the proper form.  Part of the form is to have a duly authorized official witness to the marriage.

Priests of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X (SSPX) lack the required delegation to officiate at a Catholic wedding.  No bishop has given them the delegation or faculties to marry (though I wish that were the case).  No other competent authority has given them the faculties to witness marriages (though I wish that were the case).

If a Catholic (who is obliged to obey the Church’s laws concerning marriage ) is married by an SSPX priest (who lacks the faculty, delegation, to witness marriages), he is not truly married.

Now the tough part comes to the fore.

Should we attend the wedding of a Catholic which is surely going to be invalid?

There is no canonical prohibition against attending invalid weddings.

Each of us must assess, when faced with these situations,  perhaps with the advice of a wise and trusted pastor, what the best approach is.

If this family is truly a solid Catholic family, a good heart-to-heart conversation expressing your concerns about the proposed wedding might be warranted. Perhaps they can be persuaded to seek the services of a priest actually in good standing, who could obtain (or might already have) the necessary faculties to officiate at the wedding.

Express yourself calmly and kindly.  Leave out the exclamation points and CAPS when you talk to them.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, SSPX | Tagged , , ,
16 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes

Was there a good point you heard in the sermon for your Sunday Mass of obligation?

 

Let us know!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
18 Comments

Fr. Volpi, Commissar over Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, has died.

From Corrispondenza Italiana:

E’ morto padre Fidenzio Volpi … Fr. Fidenzio Volpi is dead.

I Frati Minori Cappuccini della Provincia di S. Carlo in Lombardia hanno annunciato la morte di Padre Fidenzio Volpi, all’età di 75 anni. Le esequie verranno celebrate a Roma nella Basilica di San Lorenzo al Verano mercoledì 10 giugno alle ore 10 e nella Chiesa di Ognissanti del Cimitero di Bergamo giovedì 11 giugno alle ore 10. Nel luglio 2013 la Congregazione per gli Istituti di Vita Consacrata e le Società di Vita Apostolica, aveva esautorato i vertici dei Francescani dell’Immacolata, nominando padre Fidenzio Volpi commissario apostolico.

Fr. Volpi was the Commissar set over the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate.  A funeral is on Wednesday in Rome and again in Bergamo on 11 June.  That makes it pretty much official.

Say a prayer for his soul.

The moderation queue is ON.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
16 Comments

WDTPRS: Corpus Christi – COLLECT (2002MR)

In 1246, Robert of Thourotte, Bishop of Liège, Belgium, had instituted in his diocese the feast now known as Corpus Christi at the request of an Augustinian nun Juliana of Cornillon, who composed an office for it.  In 1264, Pope Urban IV ordered the feast of the Body of Christ to be celebrated as a holy day of obligation for the universal Church on the Thursday after Trinity Sunday and accepted the texts by the Angelic Doctor for the Mass and office.

Today’s Collect, composed by the St. Thomas Aquinas (+1274) and used at Benediction, was assumed into the post-Tridentine 1570 Missale Romanum where it has remained unchanged in all subsequent editions.

COLLECT – (2002MR):
Deus, qui nobis sub sacramento mirabili
passionis tuae memoriam reliquisti,
tribue, quaesumus,
ita nos Corporis et Sanguinis tui sacra mysteria venerari,
ut redemptionis tuae fructum in nobis iugiter sentiamus
.

I love that snappy clausula at the end… iúgiter séntiámus!  This is a marvelous prayer to sing.  Fortunately I get to do so often since in those places where I lurk we have frequent Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament with all the prayers in Latin.

Shall we have some vocabulary?  In case you were trying to look for reliquisti in your own copy of the Lewis & Short Dictionary, that esteemed tome of Latin wisdom, it is the perfect of relinquo.  It means a range of things like, “leave, leave behind” not only in the sense of in the sense of abandoning but more importantly for us also in the sense of bequeathing.  A memoria is not just “memory, the faculty of remembering,”,  it is also, “the time of remembrance” and “an historical account, narration.”  In early Christian Latin works memoria also means “a monument” in the sense of a “memorial”.

Iugiter is a great word.  It comes ultimately from the noun iugum, “a yoke or collar for horses”, “beam, lath, or rail fastened in a horizontal direction to perpendicular poles or posts, a cross-beam”.  The yoke was a symbol for defeat and slavery.  A victorious Roman general would compel the vanquished to pass under a yoke (sub iugum whence the English word “subjugate”) made of spears as a token of defeat. Vae victis! was their wail, “Woe to the vanquished!”  The prisoners were yoked together and paraded in the returning general’s triumph procession through the Forum’s via sacra to the temple of Capitoline Jupiter.  Iugiter (an adverb from the adjective iugis “yoked together”, cf. iungo) signifies “continuously”, as if one moment in time is being yoked together with the next, and the next, and so on.

LITERAL TRANSLATION:
O God, who bequeathed to us under a wondrous sacrament
the memorial of Your Passion,
grant us,
we implore,
to venerate the sacred mysteries of Your Body and Blood
in such a way that we constantly sense within us the fruit of Your redemption
.

I have heard from many places that the customs of Corpus Christi processions, Forty Hours Devotion, and Eucharistic Adoration are returning in force.  People want and need these things.  They help us to be better Catholic Christians through contact with Christ.  The bad old days of post-Conciliar denigration of these necessary practices lingers a bit but the aging-hippie priests and liturgists are losing ground under the two-fold pincer of common sense and a genuine Catholic love of Jesus.

In the seminary I attended in the 1980’s we were informed with a superior sneer towards those quaint old processions and devotions that, “Jesus said ‘Take and eat, not sit and look!’”

Somehow, “looking” was opposed to “receiving”.

This is the same error, I think, inherent in the puzzling idea that if people aren’t constantly singing or carrying stuff during Mass they are not “actively” participating as if listening and watching must be only “passive”.

Younger people no longer have that baggage, happily.  They desire the good things of our Catholic inheritance.  They resist passé attempts to make Jesus “smaller”.  They want much more, as much as the Church can give.

Remember: this is not the fault of the Council itself.  If blame must be assigned it rests on the shoulders of those who misappropriated the Council’s authority to sustain their own ideas.

Those oh so enlightened experts of the Council’s “spirit” will benignly indulge the view that old rites and customs once served a purpose long ago, perhaps for the ignorant old-world peasant and unschooled new-world immigrant, but our shiny new up-to-date man – er um – person doesn’t need those things anymore.  In this modern age man has changed.  Eucharistic devotions would be harmful rather than helpful.  They must never be permitted!  We won’t crawl in submission before God anymore. We stand!  We do not go in archaic triumphal processions or kneel to Him as judgmental King.  We take (h)im/she/it/ourselves by the hand as helping Buddy!  We are grown up now, not child-like peasant slaves before a master who is lord and father of our household.  We have changed and so old things are no longer suitable.

Wrong.

Perhaps passing details of society have changed, its fashions and ideas shifting like sandbars, but man has not changed however well dressed or sophisticated.  Admittedly there is wider education now and greater affluence in first world countries.  Many advances have been attained.  But we, as human beings, have not changed.  We poor fallen souls, citizens of modern society and newly arrived immigrants equally, all need concrete things through which by our senses we can perceive invisible realities.  Urbane schooling and wealth might well be greater obstacles to the spiritual life than poverty and ignorance, urban or rustic.  Man remains human always, good but wounded.

In 1986 the English edition of Joseph Ratzinger’s Feast of Faith was published by Ignatius Press.  In that volume Benedict XVI reflected on the feast of Corpus Christi.  His Holiness juxtaposed the sad decline of Eucharistic devotions after the Second Vatican Council with what the Council of Trent taught.  Although the anti-triumphalism of some post-Conciliar liturgists had repressed Eucharistic exposition, adoration and processions,

the Council of Trent had been far less inhibited.  It said that the purpose of Corpus Christi was to arouse gratitude in the hearts of men and to remind them of their common Lord. (cf. Decr. desc. Euch., c. 5; DS 1644).  Here in a nutshell, we have in fact three purposes: Corpus Christi is to counter man’s forgetfulness, to elicit his thankfulness, and it has something to do with fellowship, with that unifying power which is at work where people are looking for the one Lord.  A great deal could be said about this; for with our computers, meetings and appointments we have become appallingly thoughtless and forgetful (pp. 128-9).

Let us consider Trent again for a moment.  There we find the unqualified statement that Corpus Christi celebrates Christ’s triumph, his victory over death. Just as, according to our Bavarian custom, Christ was honored in the terms of a great state visit, Trent harks back to the practice of the ancient Romans who honored their victorious generals by holding triumphal processions on their return.  The purpose of Christ’s campaign was to eliminate death, that death which devours time and makes us cultivate the lie in order to forget or “kill” time.  … Far from detracting from the primacy of reception which is expressed in the gifts of bread and wine, it actually reveals fully and for the first time what “receiving” really means, namely, giving the Lord the reception due to the Victor.  To receive him means to worship him; to receive him means precisely, Quantum potes tantum aude – dare to do as much as you can.  (p. 130).

Christ invites us to learn His ways through the image of His yoke taken upon our shoulders (Matthew 11:29-30).  In terms of the world crosses and yokes are heavy instruments of bitter humiliation.  Jesus says His yoke of subjugation is “sweet” and “light”.  True freedom lies precisely in subjugation to Him.  Yokes are sweet when they are His.

To win for us this sweet yoke, He did not defeat us, He defeated the death in us.

We need no longer fear the death we all face.

In the Blessed Sacrament we now proclaim with Christ the Triumphant Victor, “O death, where is thy victory? O death, where is thy sting?” (cf. 1 Cor 15:54b – 57).

We cannot honor enough the Body and Precious Blood of Christ by which we were redeemed.

I affirm my subjugation to Christ Victor, God and King, triumphant over death, vanquisher of hell and my sins.

Before His transforming glory in the Eucharist I am content to kneel until with His own hand He raises me.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, WDTPRS | Tagged
15 Comments

WDTPRS: 2nd Sunday after Pentecost – Holy Fear

It isn’t really Corpus Christi in the traditional Roman calendar, though it is often transferred to this Sunday.  It is really the 2nd Sunday after Pentecost.  Corpus Christi was Thursday, the Thursday after Trinity Sunday.

Let’s see today’s quintessentially Roman style Collect for the 2nd Sunday after Pentecost in the 1962 Missale Romanum.

This week’s Collect survived the slash and burn expertise of the liturgists of the Consilium to live on unscathed for the 12th Sunday of Ordinary Time in the Novus Ordo. It was already in the ancient Gelasian Sacramentary on the Sunday after the Ascension (which everyone knows is also supposed to be on a Thursday).  This prayer is also prayed at the end of the Litany of the Most Holy Name of Jesus.

This is a marvelous prayer to sing in Latin!  It is simultaneously stark and lavish.  Its elements are carefully balanced.  It is perfectly Roman.

COLLECT – (1962MR):

Sancti nominis tui, Domine, timorem pariter et amorem fac nos habere perpetuum: quia numquam tua gubernatione destituis, quos in soliditate tuae dilectionis instituis.

Your bulky editions of the Lewis & Short Dictionary contain the entry, the lemma, for timor: “fear, dread, apprehension, alarm, anxiety” and, in a good sense of “fear”, “awe, reverence, veneration”.  Immediately there come to mind many citations from Scripture.  All clerics once knew the phrase from good old Psalm 111 sung every Sunday afternoon at Vespers, “Initium sapientiae est timor Domini… Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.”   Look up the first chapter of the Book of Sirach and find a meditation on timor Domini… fear of the Lord.  This is in the New Testament as well.

Gubernatio means “a steering, piloting of a ship” or “direction, management”, which is where we get the word “government”.   A gubernator is the pilot of a ship.  For the adverb pariter look under the lemma for par, paris, meaning, “equally, in an equal degree, in like manner, as well” or like simul, “of equality in time or in association, at the same time, together.”  The verb destituo is basically, “to set down” and thus it comes to mean literally, “to put away from one’s self” and therefore, “to leave alone, to forsake, abandon, desert”.   This contrasts with instituo, “to put or place into, to plant, fix, set” and a range of other things including “to make, fabricate”, “take upon one’s self, to undertake”, “to order, govern, administer, regulate”.

LITERAL ATTEMPT:

Make us to have, O Lord, constant fear and, in equal degree, love of Your Holy Name: for You never abandon with Your steering those whom You establish in the firmness of Your love.

Do you see how the concepts are balanced?  Timor/amor (fear and love) and instituo/destituo (establish and abandon)?

In instituo I hear a “setting down” in the sense of how God made us and by that making He takes us up to Himself.  He will not abandon His role in our care and governance.  God sets us down next to Himself, under His watchful eye, so that we don’t go wrong.  He shelters us.  Our humanity is “set down” now at the Father’s right hand in the person of Christ.  In destituo, on the other hand, I hear a “setting down” in the sense of a setting aside, away, an abandonment of interest.  In gubernatio God is, our pilot, our steersman, keeping his hand on the wheel of our lives.  We are solid and on a sure course because His loving hand is firm.  Were He to abandon us, our ship would wreck.  We would be “destitute”.

Amidst the vicissitudes of this world we depend in fear and love on His Holy Name, which we invoke in our neediest moments.  Let us never invoke it in vain or frivolously!

Novus Ordo 12th Sunday OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

Father, guide and protector of your people, grant us an unfailing respect for your name, and keep us always in your love.

Can you believe we had this rubbish for so many years?

Novus Ordo 12th Sunday CURRENT ICEL (2011): 

Grant, O Lord, that we may always revere and love your holy name, for you never deprive of your guidance those you set firm on the foundation of your love.

A name, in biblical and liturgical terms, is far more than just the unique combination of sounds by which we label a person or thing.  Names refer to the essence of the one named.

In the case of a divine Name we must be reverent and careful.  We must be like Moses who put off his shoes before the burning bush.  Moses learned God’s Name so he could tell the captive Jews that the one who is Being Itself – “I AM” – would set them free (cf. Exodus 2).  They were destitute.  Then they were instituted as His People.  For the Jews, the name of God was so sacred, so loved and feared in awe-filled reverence, that they would not pronounce the four Hebrew letters used to indicate it in Scripture, something like YHWH.  They substituted “Adonai”, “Lord”.

God’s Name dominates the first phrase of the prayer.

What does the Lord Jesus Himself say about His own Name?  In John 16:23 Jesus reveals His unity with the Father and the power of His Name saying, “Truly, truly, I say to you, if you ask anything of the Father, he will give it to you in my name.”  In Mark 9:38-39 we read an exchange between the beloved disciple and the Lord: “John said to him, ‘Teacher, we saw a man casting out demons in your name, and we forbade him, because he was not following us.’ But Jesus said, ‘Do not forbid him; for no one who does a mighty work in my name will be able soon after to speak evil of me.’”  The Gospel of John says that, “these [signs] are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in his name” (20:31).  His Name – His Person – is our path to everlasting life.  Signs and wonders are connected with Jesus’ Holy Name.  The Apostles and disciples worked many miracles through the Name of Jesus (cf. Acts 2:38; 3:6; 3:16; 4:7-10; 4:29-31; 19:13-17).   The Apostle Paul wrote to his flocks about the Name of Jesus.  What he taught reveals a fundamental aspect of God’s will for us His images.

God focuses in the Second Commandment on what we might do with our hands (Exodus 20:4: “You shall not make for yourself a graven image…”) and in the Third on what we might say (Exodus 20:7: “You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain”).

St.  Paul wrote: “Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father” (Philippians 2:9-11).  The Name of God, of God the Father, God the Son Jesus Christ, God the Holy Spirit, is worthy of our fear and our love.

Consider the Holy Name of Jesus.

Keep in mind not only love for the Name but also the fear which is Its due.  Do not exclude the fear which is really reverential awe.

In Scripture forms of words for “fear” occur hundreds and hundreds of times.  This a healthy loving fear.  Scripture is imbued with loving fear of God, indeed, an awe leading to love.  Consider, for example, this passage the Book of Revelation which can teach us timor:  “Then I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse! He who sat upon it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he judges and makes war.   His eyes are like a flame of fire, and on his head are many diadems; and he has a name inscribed which no one knows but himself.  He is clad in a robe dipped in blood, and the name by which he is called is The Word of God.” (Rev 19:11)   But in the book of Malachi, speaking of the Name of God, we read, “But for you who fear my name the sun of righteousness shall rise, with healing in its wings. You shall go forth leaping like calves from the stall” (Malachi 4:2).

God’s Holy Name is sacred.  “God fearing” men and women need not have terror of the Lord, but speaking and hearing His Holy Name will warm them with His love.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on WDTPRS: 2nd Sunday after Pentecost – Holy Fear

Staff breaks? Staff it out!

So… Pope goes to Sarajevo.  He was to use the Paul VI style pastoral staff/crucifix along with his most favoritest vestments, which are by now so very very familiar.  Via Vatican Insider.

Problem: the Paul VI staff broke!

Oh dear… what a shame!

Thinking fast, Msgr. Guido Marini, head of the Pope’s liturgy staff, working against the clock, fixed it the staff with … I’m not making this up… adhesive tape.

One of my friends from Rome tweeted: “Even Paul VI must have thought, ‘I don’t want my ferula to be part of this.”

I dunno… which would be better.  Enter without a staff, or enter with a staff fixed with sticky tape?

Pope Francis arrives to lead the mass at the stadium in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, June 6, 2015.    REUTERS/Max Rossi

Pope Francis arrives to lead the mass at the stadium in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, June 6, 2015. REUTERS/Max Rossi

“Taaape up the Croooss….”

In another post, HERE, I mentioned that when I travel, I always take some gaffers tape.

The story says that when Pius IX’s ferula used by Benedict XVI was damaged, a copy was made and no noticed the difference.

I think they noticed this time.

UPDATE:

Msgr. Guido Marini, papal MC, is pretty unflappable.

And dig the dramatic music!

Posted in Francis, Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , ,
44 Comments

A businessman thinks outside the box

I like it when business owners think outside the box.

From Eater.com:

How a Restaurant Tripled Its Profits by Eliminating Tips

The employees get paid vacation days, too.

Things are working out quite well for Bar Marco, the Pittsburgh restaurant that eliminated tips and put their staff members on salary. In January, co-owner Bobby Fry told Eater that he planned to give his full-time employees a base salary of $35,000 a year, plus healthcare, paid vacation, and 500 shares in the company. Plus, employees would only be asked to work a maximum of 40 to 44 hours per week. According to Entrepreneur, the unconventional model is working quite well for Fry and his team — profits are have nearly tripled in two months. Weekly profits have jumped from about $3,000 per week to $9,000 per week.

Fry tells Entrepreneur that revenues “exceeded expectations by 26 percent” and that overhead costs dropped by eight percent. Other costs went down too: “Our water bill was cut in half, our linen bill was cut in half, our liquor inventory was lean.” Fry mainly attributes this to “revived employee cognizance” thanks to the restaurant’s new business model. He also notes that the restaurant introduced a “retooled menu comprising of cheaper, local ingredients,” and more shareable plates, which has helped keep costs down.

The model has been so successful that the team has decided to implement it at Bar Marco’s sister restaurant, The Livermore, when it reopens this week. Thanks to bonuses, Bar Marco employees are likely to take home between $48,000 and $51,000 this year.

Many cities and states have increased or are in the process of increasing the hourly minimum wage to $15 per hour. This has upset many restaurateurs who argue that they will not be able to pay their staff such high wages. Fry believes, however, that they should considering switching up how they do business considering that many restaurant workers currently live in poverty: [NB]You cannot tell me that your business model relies on paying people below the poverty line.” He adds, “Google is the best company in the world for how much money they make per employee and that’s because they put all their time and energy into their employees. It pays off for them in fistfuls.”

Interesting.

Thinking out of the box.

Is there anything to be learned from this for churchy environments?

Off the top of my head… perhaps stop thinking about the Sunday collection as “tips”.  Rather, regular automatic account deduction….  I know this is being done in some places.

Otherwise, …?

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Just Too Cool | Tagged
15 Comments