QUAERITUR: I had gum soon after Mass, threw it away. Am I excommunicated?

From a reader:Twitter

After Mass I absent-mindedly had some gum. It was pretty soon after so had I any particles still in my teeth etc, it would have got in the gum. I realized this and retained the gum until I next saw a priest, who said not to worry about it and to just throw the gum away. I don’t particularly trust this priest because he’s a bit of Spirit of Vatican II times, so it’s difficult to know when he’s right and wrong.

I was reading some stuff from Redemptionis Sacramentum, which said that “one who throws away the consecrated species or takes them away or keeps them for a sacrilegious purpose incurs a latae sententiae [automatic] excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See […] ” To be regarded as pertaining to this case is any action that is voluntarily and gravely disrespectful of the sacred species."

Please help! I’m fretting about whether I’m excommunicate or not etc.

You can stop fretting.

First, you cannot incur an excommunication if you did not commit the mortal sin associated with the act.  You clearly didn’t intend anything against the Eucharist, which you clearly revere.

Also, you don’t know if you had any particles of the Host still present. 

Furthermore, anything that would have been left would rapidly have been broken down and its accidents obliterated – if they weren’t already. 

When you threw away the gum you did not throw away the Blessed Sacrament.  You did not incur the censure.  You are not excommunicated.

That said, your situation also is a good object lesson giving us yet another reason a) to remain in church for a while after Holy Mass to make a thanksgiving, even if only a brief one, and b) why people should maintain reverent and respectful silence in our churches before and after Mass so that anyone who chooses to can pray without being disturbed.

The sheer racket in churches after Mass sometimes leads me to question whether or not any of those folks have the slightest clue of what sacred means. 

In any event, you don’t need to fret.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
43 Comments

Another SCOTUS summer

This morning President Obama nominated US Solicitor General Elena Kagan to replace Justice Stevens on the Supreme Court of the United States.

Her approval by the Senate is virtually a lock.

At least the MSM won’t be able to whine about yet another dangerous, foreign-power-obeying Catholic on the SCOTUS.  50 year old.  Ms. Kagan is Jewish.  She is not married. 

During her stint at Harvard Law Kagan banned military recruiters from the Harvard campus because of the U.S. military’s "Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell" policy.  She thought that policy discriminated against homosexuals. 

I suspect we will hear a great deal more about this during the summer.  It is one of the only things she has done which gives a clue to her views.

However, Lifenews.com states that Kagan is pro-abortion because, among other things, she "vigorously opposed the de-funding of taxpayer-funded clinics which promote abortions, despite the fact that a majority of Americans do not want their tax dollars to fund abortion providers."  On this point, however, even if Kagan is found to be pro-abortion, so was Justice Steven, whom she will replace.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras | Tagged
16 Comments

PRAYERCazT: Vespers and Compline (BrevRom)

I will have company for supper – the Boeuf Bourguignon I prepared yesterday – and so I have done Vespers and Compline a bit early, also as a help to the tired brethren out there who might want either to follow or listen.

No frills… just me reading the hours at a clip.

 

 

Posted in PRAYERCAzT: What Does The (Latin) Prayer Really Sound L |
7 Comments

What to do? Sunday supper

About Sunday supper. 

I have been working on eggs, sandwiches, cereal and ramen for a while.

Thus, I have a hankering for one of these two.

Which shall it be?

Help me chose.

I will have to go for groceries tomorrow, so get your vote in.

{democracy:56}

And you can pitch in for the groceries!  o{];¬)

UPDATE: Sat 8 May

Thanks for the votes!

Visit HERE for what I make.

Posted in The Feeder Feed |
32 Comments

The Feeder Feed: New Bird!

TwitterToday’s new bird is not new to me, but this is the first sighting of the season.

I just had time to point the camera and shoot, but he was on his way.

Mr. Rose-Breasted Grosbeak.

UPDATE:

No sooner did I post, but he came back.

Posted in The Feeder Feed |
11 Comments

What’s wrong with this? “Cogito, ergo sum; thus if I think I am reverent, I am”

This is sure to delight readers with a predisposition for the older form of Mass, or at least Roman-style worship, and those with a predilection for St. Thomas Aquinas.

I received a curious email about an organization called the Institute of Advanced Physics.

This organization, the Institute of Advanced Physics, is very interesting. It is devoted to promoting Thomistic philosophy in modern physics with the aim of uprooting the pervasive Cartesian idealism from society in general and from the Church specifically, and [take note…] its members all attend Latin masses[I think that means they attend the Traditional Latin Mass, rather than simply "Latin Mass", which could be in either use of the Roman Rite.  Qui bene distinguit bene docet.] It is devoted to the Thomistic tenet that all intellectual knowledge comes through the senses (Nihil est in intellectu quod non prius in sensu.), and it firmly believes that the denial of this is the cause of many problems, e.g., [NB:] thinking that kneeling while receiving communion is no different from standing and receiving it in the hands because "Cogito, ergo sum; thus if I think I am reverent, I am" [Interesting.] and sterilizing the Novus Ordo form of the mass of its sensory elements, physicality being essential to a sacrament. The IAP thinks that most in the Church simply don’t realize how scientism has stealthily poisoned the modern Catholic Church. We are going to lose the war on scientism unless we, and especially Catholic scientists, genuinely say, "Ite ad Thomam."

Provocative! 

Fellow travelers.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
27 Comments

Kathryn Jean Lopez on Pope Benedict, the New York Times, and the recent controversy

From Headline Bistro of the Knights of Columbus comes this piece by Kathryn Jean Lopez of National Review.

My emphases and comments.

A Holy Father

by Kathryn Jean Lopez

It was Holy Week. It was Holy Week and everywhere I turned – or so it seemed to this news junkie — I heard calls for the pope’s resignation. He would step down, pundits on MSNBC could have had you believing, as if it were a foregone conclusion and absolutely necessity. The veritable end of the Catholic Church – or at least the Vatican — if you were to believe some writing for the New York Times, was both imminent and welcome.

Of course, at the same time you had churches in the sophisticated metropolises of New York and Washington, D.C., between which I divide my time, overflowing. As clear as the palpability of the Real Presence in the Holy Eucharist is for me – a gift I wish for everyone – was the reality of what was going on. This is no end but a beginning. The story of redemption, yet again. The Cross conquers the sin and evil that we are known to succumb to.

A few months ago while he was in New York promoting his book, The Difference God Makes, I asked Francis Cardinal George of Chicago if the Church, right now, were undergoing a renewal. The story of Christianity is a continual story of renewal, he told me. The Church is always undergoing a renewal. [Perfectly correct, but that was the easy answer.]

It’s the story of men and each one of our souls. It’s why I don’t know whether to laugh or cry when I read the author of God Is Not Great declare that “here is an ancient Christian church that deals in awful certainties when it comes to outright condemnation of sins like divorce, abortion, contraception, and homosexuality between consenting adults. For these offenses there is no forgiveness.” There is always forgiveness! To miss that, is to miss it all[I think this speaks to the spirit of the lex talionis which is so prominent today.  It always has been, of course.  But with the decline of skills of reasoning and the shortening of attentions spans, it is getting worse.]

Pope Benedict was recently in Turin, Italy. “I am here as Successor of Peter, and I carry in my heart the whole Church, indeed, all of humanity,” he said. He confessed to being drawn to the Shroud of Turin as so many others have been because there is a “light” in the “darkness” there. There is “victory” there. There is a glimpse of “the death of Jesus, but glimpse his resurrection [too]; in the heart of death there now beats life, inasmuch as love lives there.” Here Christ “takes upon himself man’s passion of every time and every place, even our passion, our suffering, our difficulties, our sins – ‘Passio Christi. Passio hominis’ — from this moment there emanates a solemn majesty, a paradoxical lordship.”

I thought of Benedict’s words while at Saint Patrick’s Cathedral for the tenth anniversary of the death of John Cardinal O’Connor earlier this week. Ecumenically, we gathered to celebrate. Former New York mayor Ed Koch was there, remembering the man who, he said, changed his life through his loving friendship. Walking distance from the New York Times headquarters, I thought of one of the paper’s columnists and his campaign to convince the world that the ceremony is all remnants of a false and failing Church as I looked at Archbishop Timothy Dolan with his elaborate staff and miter as we celebrated Mass. He would go on to talk about the oblative power of the priesthood. ["oblative"!  A word we don’t see used often enough.  From Latin "offero", "oblative" has to do with the function of offering sacrifice to God and, as the reverse of the medal, bearing sacrifice.  Christ (and his priests) are at the same time priest who offers and victim who is offered.  Just as an aside, I don’t think she meant "oblate" in the sense of "pumpkin-shaped", though that would not be entirely out of bounds when applied to clergy.] And I couldn’t help to see the edifying beauty in it all – the Church’s beautiful spiritual and corporal works that gain the admiration of even those who don’t believe. But the bells and smells and discipline and traditions are not problems. Christ is the heart of the Church. A lack of fidelity, a rejection of Truth are the problems[But meld the works of mercy to sound worship and the result is what I have been pushing here for years.]

The doors of the cathedral were open that evening. On one side I could almost see the consulate of the Venezuelan regime. On another side I saw Saks Fifth Avenue, where I not-too-long-ago encountered an in-your-face “Want It!” campaign that might have been an excellent way to encourage shopping but probably didn’t reflect the best of us. [Get this…] The world needs this solemn majesty. [Exactly.] Every man and woman outside and inside needs it. Sinners on and off the altar, all. Secular Jews, too.

Koch recently defended the Catholic Church against the attacks of the New York Times and others. He saw what others wouldn’t: that the pile-on has an agenda behind it. [Indeed.]

There are so many sins. There have always been and there always will be. But the Church today is reacting and protecting differently today than it once did. In part because we just know what we once didn’t. In part because there is more transparency. And in no small part because, especially here in the U.S., we have strict norms that won’t tolerate abuse and make laxity and coverup near to impossible.

One of those sinful, deeply shameful and hurtful stories is the still-unfolding story of the Legionaries of Christ. The Vatican recently released a clear and direct statement on the investigation five bishops conducted on the religious order. This statement outlines the multilayered role of the pope and other members of the hierarchy of the Church: to be teacher, to be father, and yes, to be enforcer. No tolerance for abuse. No question about what the heart of the Church is. There is compassion. There are no excuses and punishment, too.

If a heart can weep, I have watched this pope’s, as he speaks of scandal and meets with victims of abuse at the hands of priests who rejected their calling. They rejected their calling when they abused our Lord’s children. When his heart weeps, it’s united with the Sacred Heart of Jesus, which is as real as the Real Presence. And as the pope weeps, he must feel the pain of our Lord on the cross as we rejected him – rejected him as a priest did when he was not being a priest, who was not being Catholic, when he abused a child.

He weeps, too, because of all the priests and Catholics who walk around with a cloud above them, or who are confused and angry and hurt because of what a minority have done. He knows that there are men and women who are in grave danger of losing their faith because of others who have lacked the courage of integrity.

While MSNBC waits for the pope’s resignation, he, every day, leads a renewal. In our hearts and in the structure of the Church. I think even the New York Times  realizes it. It’s why they grasp at old stories, trying to obscure what’s happening now. And even as they do that, they have to admit, as they recently did, that “there are indications that Benedict had a lower tolerance for sexual misconduct by elite clergy members than other top Vatican officials.” [Did the MSM campaign backfire, in a sense?]

Reading the statement on the Legion out of the Vatican, I’d conclude no tolerance. If it hadn’t been firm and had teeth, frankly, it would have been a bigger news story. The fact is that Benedict is a leader of renewal, a solution to the problem. [He is implementing, against great opposition, what I refer to as his "Marshall Plan" for the Church, to rebuild our Catholic identity after the last few decades of devastation.] He has been and continues to be. And that’s why, while trying to do the opposite, the “Paper of Record” couldn’t help but admit it. At a paper that has a libertine interest in the collapse of the institution that offers something radically countercultural, that has to be bad news. But it’s the news all the same, thanks be to God, working, in part, through our Holy Father today.

Pray. Listen. Be true. Fidelity to the faith, to our vocations, to our Lord, these are the answers to sin and scandal. Pray the Holy Father continues to be lead by the Spirit in this renewal, and each and every member of the Body of Christ.

Kathryn Jean Lopez is editor-at-large of National Review Online (www.nationalreview.com) and a nationally syndicated columnist.

 

WDTPRS kudos to Ms. Lopez.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Clerical Sexual Abuse, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged
6 Comments

Color differentiation

A tip of the biretta to Mark Shea and Mike Flynn for this chuckle.  o{]:¬)

Posted in Lighter fare |
39 Comments

Card. Kasper on the talks between the SSPX and the Holy See

Apparently our Catholic identity is involved.

This is from Reuters with my emphases and comments:

Vatican talks with splinter group difficult

 By Tom Heneghan, Religion Editor

PARIS (Reuters) – Vatican talks with a controversial splinter group have been difficult and the ultra-traditionalist Catholics will have to make concessions if an accord is to be reached, a senior Vatican cardinal said on Wednesday.

The Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), whose four bishops were readmitted to the Church last year after a ban of 21 years, cannot conduct the doctrinal discussions on their terms, but only on those of the Vatican, Cardinal Walter Kasper said. [It is not, of course, a dialogue between "equals".]

The closed-door talks are a key issue for the Catholic Church because, although the SSPX is small, its return to the fold has been so stormy. [And now for an entirely irrelevant tangent…] One readmitted bishop, Richard Williamson, is a Holocaust denier convicted and fined for hate speech in Germany.

Pope Benedict’s eagerness to rehabilitate the SSPX, despite its rejection of the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) reforms, troubles Catholic critics who see them as anti-Semites who want to turn back the clock on 40 years of dialogue among religions.

"Dialogue with them is not easy," Kasper, who heads the Vatican department for relations with other Christian churches and with Jews, told a news conference during a visit to Paris.

"The main problem with them is not the Mass in Latin," he said, referring to the SSPX’s insistence on the pre-Council liturgy, "but the concept of tradition. Do we want a living tradition or a petrified one?"

"I’m for a dialogue, but on our conditions, not on the traditionalists’ conditions," he added. The SSPX had to accept the Council reforms, the "sine qua non" of any accord.  [Although we have no idea what "accept the Council reforms" actually means.]

Without an accord, the group will have no official status and its clergy will not be recognised as Catholic priests or allowed to exercise their ministry. [That is not quite accurate.  The priests are recognized as priests but they have no permission from the Church to exercise a priestly ministry.]

Benedict, who has promoted a return to Catholic tradition and identity during his five-year papacy, said in January that the talks among three theologians from each side were held up over "doctrinal problems" he did not specify.

The SSPX, numbering several hundred thousand members, insists it represents the true faith and the Vatican and the vast majority of the Church went off the rails at the Council.

POPE’S SLEEPLESS NIGHTS

Even while its theologians meet Vatican experts every other week to seek a common understanding of the Council, its leaders have been criticising key doctrines of that historic event.

SSPX head Bishop Bernard Fellay said in March the Vatican theologians "wish the Church well but also want to save the Second Vatican Council — that’s like squaring a circle."

Williamson, ignoring a gag order Fellay imposed on him after his interview denying the Holocaust, dismissed the Vatican talks in January as a futile bid to harmonise irreconcilable views.

"Either the SSPX becomes a traitor, or Rome converts, or it’s a dialogue of the deaf," he said.

In recent months, the SSPX head in Germany has criticised Benedict for visiting the Rome synagogue and the French district head said dialogue with other faiths was ruining the Church.

A former colleague, German theologian Wolfgang Beinert, told Der Spiegel magazine last month that the pope had told him the SSPX issue "robs him of his sleep." He did not think Benedict would compromise at any cost with the ultra-traditionalists[Pope Benedict is the Pope of Christian Unity.]

Kasper, the second-highest German at the Vatican after Benedict, said the SSPX has staunchly opposed the dialogue with other Christian churches for which he is responsible.

"They’ve attacked me as a heretic," he said with a smile.

Asked why the ultra-traditionalists opposed ecumenical dialogue so strongly, he said: "Some people feel threatened in their Catholic identity when we speak with Protestants.

"We need to have a Catholic identity," he said. "But we need an open and mature identity, not a closed one. That’s not a mature identity."

(Editing by Tim Pearce)

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged
47 Comments

Did you know… ?

… that if you are hard-boiling eggs, and you forget them, they eventually explode?

Posted in Lighter fare |
57 Comments