QUAERITUR: communal recitation of office in parishes during Triduum

From a reader:

 

In preparation for Holy Week I (for the first time ever) read PASCHALES SOLEMNITATIS and noted that in paragraph 40 it states that "It is recommended that there be a communal celebration of the Office of Readings and Morning Prayer on Good Friday and Holy Saturday."  I would like to have the opportunity to do this in my parish, although to my knowledge it has not been done in the past.  eBreviary actually provides the prayers in PDF form for these days free of charge.  I am considering asking our pastor if he would permit such a communal celebration in our parish chapel.  Would I be off base in doing so?  Is there anything that I need to take into account if we are given permission to go forward (i.e., is Morning Prayer on Good Friday and Holy Saturday at the same time as always – or is it prayed the night before [I am somewhat confused how these prayers relate to Tenebrae]?).

I don’t think it is off-base to ask to do something that is recommended by the Church.

The morning office, which has a special structure, during the Triduum is called "Tenebrae".
 
I think I will open this up to the readership.

What is going on in your parishes?

How did you get it going and what do you do?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
21 Comments

Gerald Warner’s thunder about the abuse scandal and what caused it

The Telegraph offers this by Gerald Warner (Gerald Warner is an author, broadcaster, columnist and polemical commentator who writes about politics, religion, history, culture and society in general.)

My emphases and comments:

Catholic sex abuse scandal: time to sack trendy bishops and restore the faith

By
Gerald Warner

It has become fashionable to claim that the sex abuse scandal currently afflicting the Catholic Church is “its biggest crisis since the Reformation”. Oh, really? Tell me about it. The abuse issue is just a small part of the much larger crisis that has engulfed the Church since the Second Vatican Catastrophe and which is more serious than the Reformation. [And we’re off…!]

Abolish clerical celibacy? The last thing a priest abusing altar boys needs or wants is a wife. There is no compulsory celibacy in the Church of England, but that has not prevented vicars and boy scouts furnishing gratifying amounts of copy to the tabloid Sunday papers for the past century. Celibacy goes against the grain of today’s “unrepressed”, “non-judgemental”, let-it-all-hang-out attitude to sex; its continued existence is a reproach to the hedonist Western world; [actually… everything Catholic is that… not just celibacy…] so Rome must be persuaded to abolish it [not "persuaded", but "intimidated", "beaten-down", "badgered"] – likewise its condemnation of divorce, abortion, contraception, homosexuality and all the other fetishes of liberal society. Dream on, secularists.

“Irish abuse victims disappointed by Pope’s letter.” Of course they are. They were disappointed by it before they had read it, before it was even written. [NB:] Any other response would diminish the power they find themselves wielding against the Church.[!]  Have they a legitimate grievance? In most cases, yes. They have a ferocious grievance against the “filth” (Benedict XVI’s term, long before he came under public pressure) who defiled them and treated them like animals.

How could clergy transgress so gravely against the doctrines of the Church? What doctrines? These offences took place in the wake of Vatican II, when doctrines were being thrown out like so much lumber. These offenders were the children of Paul VI and “aggiornamento”. Once you have debauched the Mystical Body of Christ, defiling altar boys comes easily. 

The “neglected” sacraments and devotional practices that the Pope says could have prevented this did not just wither on the vine: they were actively discouraged by bishops and priests. [This is where I need to intervene.  I am sure that some of the more traddy stripe are crowing as they read.  I would remind them to supress that reptilian brain-stem a little and recall – before reading the next self-affirming quote – that we are all in this together.  When clergy and lay people of the Church fall down, every one suffers.  The whole Church needs to help the fallen to rise again.  We need to do that by raising the level of holiness, of penance, and worthy worship, just as a rising tide raises every boat.  Read on, now, and feel that affirmation…] In the period when this abuse was rampant, there was just one mortal sin in the Catholic Church: daring to celebrate or attend the Latin Tridentine Mass. [And that is pretty close the the truth!] A priest raping altar boys would be moved to another parish; as for a priest who had the temerity to celebrate the Old Mass – his feet would not touch the ground. [They were – and in some places still are – treated in much the same way.]

There was a determined resolve among the bishops to deny any meaningful catechesis to the young. That is the generation, wholly ignorant of the faith, that in Ireland achieved material prosperity in the “Celtic Tiger” economy. Initially it still attended Mass (or what passed for Mass) out of social conformity. Then the sex abuse scandal gave Irish post-Vatican II agnostics the perfect pretext for apostasy: tens of thousands who had never been abused, nor met anybody who had, found an excuse to stay in bed on Sunday mornings.

The abusive priests are not the only hypocrites. [This is so common today…] “I am so shocked by the abuse scandal I am leaving the Church.” Right. So, the fact that some degenerates who should never have been ordained violated young people – in itself a deplorable sin – means that the Son of God did not come down to earth, redeem mankind on the cross and found the Church? This appalling scandal no more compromises the truths of the Faith than the career of Alexander VI or any other corrupt Renaissance Pope.  [Tell that to people with increasingly thin critical thinking skills and who are slaves of the mass media.]

Should bishops be forced to resign? Oh yes – approximately 95 per cent of them worldwide. [!] These clowns in their pseudo-ethnic mitres and polyester vestments with faux-naïve Christian symbols, spouting their ecumaniac episcobabble, [whew!] have presided over more than sexual abuse: [here it comes] they have all but extinguished the Catholic faith with their modernist fatuities. [Do I hear an "Amen!"?] They should be retired to monasteries to spend their remaining years considering how to account to their Maker for a failed stewardship that has lost countless millions of souls.

Benedict XVI should take advantage of a popular wave of revulsion against the failed episcopate to sack every 1960s flared-trousered hippy who is obstructing Summorum Pontificum. It is a unique opportunity to cull the hireling shepherds and clear away the dead wood of the Second Vatican Catastrophe. It is time to stop the apologies and reinstate apologetics; to rebuild all that has been destroyed in the past 40 years; to square up to liberals and secularists as so many generations of Catholics did in the past; to proclaim again the immutable truths of the One True Church that, in the glory of the Resurrection, can have no legitimate posture other than triumphalism.

Okay!  I am sure you are all ready to suit up and ride into battle now.

And that is a good idea. 

But the triumphalism he suggests will be empty unless we all do penance, also for the sins of others.

We must also have a revitalization of Holy Church’s worship.  What we have been doing for the last few decades is not working.

Something of my "manifesto" after the Notre Shame Debacle could be relevant here.

I urge all priests and bishops who read this blog with any slight quaver of resonance or benevolence, to consider this with care:

If you sense that something quite serious and important is going on right now, for the love of God rethink your approach to how you foster Holy Church’s proper public worship .

Do all in your power and through your influence to foster a worship of God which conforms not to worldly goals – as praiseworthy as they may be in a world still dominated by its dire prince – but rather to the real point of religion: an encounter with mystery

Our worship must become more and more focused on the one who is Other.  Seek what is truly above in your rites and raise people to encounter mystery.

You will be challenged and reviled, blocked and attacked as you do.  You will be worn down and afraid under the weight of resistance.

But I think that to save the world we must save the liturgy.

The Church’s enemies, the Church’s deeply confused, can’t compete with the fullness of Catholic liturgy and sound preaching.

Reforming the liturgy along the lines Pope Benedict has proposed may be the most loving and effective option we have in these ever hotter times.

People will have to keep working very much in the sphere of the secular.  Of course!  Our inward Catholic Christian identity must find outward expression and bring concrete fruits.

But I think the real work now – where we will make some effective headway – must be done at the level of our public worship.

In the present circumstances, we are not going to argue most people out of danger or error.  But together we can draw them in and along and back through worship.

So long as we remain doctrinally faithful and active in works of mercy both spiritual and especially temporal, if we get our public worship together we will have a strong bastion against error. 

Holy Catholic worship will be an attractive force for conversion.

We need to foster worship which stuns, which leaves the newcomer, long-time practicing Catholic, above all the fallen-away simply thunder stuck.  Worship must at some point leave people speechless in awe.  We need language and music and gesture which in its beauty floods the mind with light even while it swells the heart to bursting.

The more people encounter mystery through liturgy, the more hollow will clang the false or incomplete messages of those who have strayed from the good path, either to the left or to the right.  

Our goal must be that which is good and beautiful because it is true, that which reflects what is of God, not man’s image merely.  Give us mystery, not fabrications smacking of the world, fallen and transitory.

Fathers, and you Reverend Bishops, if anything of alarm has sounded in your hearts and minds of late, rethink your approach to our worship.  Examine your approach with an eye on the signs of the times.  Take a new approach

The approach we have had least last few decades isn’t getting it done.  Really … it isn’t

Going neither left nor right along the road toward the Lord, even as He comes to us, take the flock now deeper, now higher on that path, but always to encounter the mystery which distinguishes truly Catholic liturgy… and therefore true Catholics.

Lines are being drawn, sides taken, choices made.

More than ever we need what Christ, the true Actor of our liturgy, desires to offer us through Holy Church’s worship.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged
60 Comments

QUAERITUR: priest gives horrible, erroneous counsel in confession; to whom do I turn?

From a reader:

Christ has given me the heavy cross of same sex attractions to carry (I’m 26). Today I confessed matter regarding same sex activity and I was [get this] told by the Priest that I should get a Boyfriend and settle down with him, [Total fail.] he told me he knows of homosexual couples active in the church and that they receive communion, times have changed and attitudes towards homosexuals have as well. The Priest was in his late seventies.  [And he had better get worried about standing befor God and receiving a horrible judgment for his failure to teach the truth and for confusing the faithful.]

So I have another Priest who I wont go to confession to due to his lack of orthodoxy. I have informed the Archbishop … of being told similar advice in the past and he doesn’t want to know the name of the Priest, although he did apologise to me for it.

Who is the proper authority in the Church that I should write to, to inform them of this kind of nonsense?

I now know why the scandal in Ireland took place.

The problem with writing to the Holy See about something like this is that it is a matter of the internal forum, that is, the priest cannot talk about it since it is a matter of the confessional and therefore under the Seal.

When you write to a dicastery of the Holy See, you really need to present something concrete they can work with.  Best are actual church bulletins, photos, written documents, recordings of talks, sermons, etc.

 

You took steps to inform the local Archbishop.  That was the best thing to do.  At this point there isn’t much else unless you start hearing from other people similar problems about what he is saying in the confessional.

The office of the Holy See that would deal with this sort of thing would have to be the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.  If there were any aspect of the case that would require the aid of another Congregation, they would take care of that.

Again, just saying to them that you heard this in confession isn’t going to help much.  Even if they did contact the bishop or priest, the priest is bound by the Seal and could very rightly refuse to speak about the situation one way or another.

In the mean time, I apologize for that jackass move of his and pray that you will not be discouraged both in your personal spiritual warfare and suffering.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
46 Comments

Archbp. of Ottawa: kneel!

This is from The Gazette of Ottawa with my emphases and comments:

Ottawa archbishop lays down law on kneeling
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
By Jennifer Green
 
OTTAWA — Ottawa’s archbishop has ordered all Catholics to conform in how they kneel during mass, despite widespread grumbling that uniformity doesn’t equal sanctity, or even unity.  [Note the vocabularly choices.  The writer doesn’t seem to like this.]

Archbishop Terrence Prendergast circulated a letter recently asking that everyone kneel for the entire Eucharistic prayer from "Holy, holy, holy" to the conclusion "Let us proclaim the mystery of faith" — about five minutes in all.

Currently, some congregations stand for most of the prayer, kneeling only as the priest prepares holy communion. Some stand for the whole thing; others kneel throughout.

Archbishop Prendergast said in his letter: "I have noted a wide range of practices … which present a lack of harmony in a matter where we should be united — the worship of God.

"I know that it may not be easy for some to accept. However, I am convinced its implementation will bring blessings to our archdiocese and I invite your co-operation with this directive."  [Notice how we have moved from "order" to "ask" to "invite".]

In an interview later, he explained: "It’s a sign of reverence. People say, ‘I don’t like that. We are the people set free, we no longer have to kneel to God,’ and I said, ‘Wait a minute, we do have to kneel to God. Christ knelt in the garden. People knelt before Jesus. Why can’t we do that for a few minutes at mass?’ "

One woman told him her husband might not come to church because of this. [How stupid is that?] "She said, ‘we French Canadians have a bit of an inferiority complex. We don’t like people telling us what to do’."  [Imagine.]

He replied that, if the husband does come, he is free to stand through the prayer, but at the back of the church, where he won’t confuse everyone else.  [For heaven’s sake.]

It seems a small thing to ask the faithful to kneel [to GOD] during mass, but opponents say that’s just the point, especially since it is the archbishop’s first firm order since he arrived in this area last year.

[Now get this stunningly obtuse comment….] "Is that all they have to think about?" asked former Ottawa councillor Toddy Kehoe, a parishioner at St. Joseph’s parish on Laurier Avenue East. "I don’t see the Catholic church as doing loving things. I don’t see them as the caring community they should be. It isn’t whether you stand or kneel."

St. Joseph’s Rev. Richard Kelly declined to comment, [?!?] as did a staff member who said in an e-mail: "It is hard to believe that a kneeler is such a big topic, and I wish I could say something about this piece of furniture that was meaningful, [So do I.  You ought to be able to.] and about the prayer posture we have been requested to assume, but we are in difficult times and the focus for us as a parish is really how can we participate in the truth and reconciliation process with the aboriginal community of Canada.[Connect this to the stunningly obtuse comment, above.]

Even Rev. William Burke, associate director of the national liturgy office at the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, refused to comment for fear of fanning the controversy. [?!?] Canadian bishops have already agreed to adopt this rule when the new missal, or Catholic mass book, is introduced in the near future.

Archbishop Prendergast acknowledged the underlying strains. "Every time you talk about liturgy, everything else going on in the church is reflected." [YES!  He get’s it.  Save The Liturgy – Save The World, too.]

Right now, the Catholic church is asking, "Is (the mass) our thing or is it God’s thing? There are certain tensions in the church about that.

"After 40 years since the Vatican Council, we have gotten away from certain aspects of reverence; we’re trying to have more harmony and co-ordination. Harmony will help bolster a sense of divine worship, something that has slipped away.

"What has happened with the liturgy is that it is being asked to bear too many things." [That is interesting.]

At one mass, people got so enthusiastic about greeting each other at the exchange of the peace that it took 45 minutes to get back to the pews and resume the service.  [!]

"That’s not what mass is about. It’s about worshipping God," Archbishop Prendergast said.

"At one time, nobody ever applauded. Now, they applaud for everything. It becomes more like a concert."  [grrrr]

As to his authoritarian message, he said, "The bishop is the mentor of the liturgy, moderator, the one who calls the shots. I try to do it gently."

Nevertheless, to both clergy and congregants, he says, "I know you disagree, but I would like you to come along."

If someone comes to church and stubbornly stands, they won’t be asked to leave. But, the archbishop says, "You sort of wonder, what are they proving when there are two people standing in a church of 500 kneeling? Some people always have to let you know they’re right."

 

WDTPRS kudos to Archbp. Prendergast.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
64 Comments

Prayers for Pope Benedict

In checking the blog of His Hermeneuticalness this morning, I found…

I am reminded that Pope Benedict does have a public email address: benedictxvi@vatican.va

Now might be a good time to send a supportive and encouraging email. Obviously he is not going to read them all himself but it is possible that an official might let him know that there has been a number of loyal and kind messages incoming.

And do remember to pray for him. One way of reminding yourself to do this is to try to gain plenary indulgences as often as possible, fulfilling the condition of praying for the intentions of the Holy Father.

 

Remind others to pray for Benedict XVI.

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity |
11 Comments

LifeSite: Obama as Provocateur of Catholic Dissention

I am sure some of you recall that during the Notre Shame debacle I repeated constantly that Pres. Obama was trying purposely to subvert the Catholic community.  Some of you said I was crying "Wolf!".

This is from Lifesite:

Architect of Betrayal?: WH Exposes Obama as Provocateur of Catholic Dissention

By Peter J. Smith and Kathleen Gilbert

WASHINGTON, DC, March 18, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs revealed to reporters today that President Barack Obama actively promoted the Catholic Health Association’s public break with the American Catholic bishops to support his health care legislation[Read that again.  Slowly.  Remember it.]

Gibbs also suggested that the CHA and the Leadership Conference of Women Religious’ (LCWR) break with the U.S. Bishops has provided legitimate political cover for pro-life Democrats to switch their votes from "no" to "yes.[Read that again.]

"I think over the past twenty four hours we have seen strong indications from those in the Catholic Church that support our belief that the legislation is about health care reform, and that it shouldn’t and doesn’t change the existing federal law [on abortion]. [And I think that is a lie.  But… you decide.] The Catholic Health Association and the order of nun’s support [NB…]  is very important," Gibbs told reporters on the White House lawn for Thursday’s press conference.

CHA president Sr. Carol Keehan and LCWR sparked an uproar this week after they came out definitively in favor of the Senate health care bill, which top pro-life organizations such as the National Right to Life Committee and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, in addition to countless others, have strongly condemned as unacceptable for its abortion funding provisions. Since then, in their quest to woo the final pro-life Democrat holdouts among House lawmakers, party leaders have attempted to paint CHA’s support for the bill as a bona fide endorsement from the Catholic community[Get that?  CHA’s support was "bona fide endoresment from the CATHOLIC community"?  This is why I wrote "A magisterium of nuns".  They have set themselves up as an alternative magisterium to that of the Church with the bishops.]

So far, the president’s strategy appears to have paid off: some lawmakers have evidently already taken the two groups’ endorsements as an excuse to switch their vote. [I hate being right about things like this.]

Gibbs cited Congressman Dale Kildee’s (D-MI) Wednesday press conference – in which he explained how CHA’s endorsement had "affected his thinking" to get him to support the bill – as a sign that [NB] Democrats may be able to get more lawmakers on board in the same way.

Gibbs said that the president had been engaged on the issue, and a reporter asked if he had reached out personally to the groups.

"The President met earlier this week with Sr. Keehan of the CHA," said Gibbs, saying the meeting took place in the Roosevelt Room, but that he "did not get a detailed run-down of the pitch that [Obama] made."

"I do know that he was effusive about her support and her as a person for making the courageous statements that she has," he said.  [And I bet he doesn’t remember her name today.]

Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), one of the pro-life Democrat holdouts against the bill, pointed out this week that, as a trade association, the Catholic Health Association (CHA) has more at stake with the bill’s passage than it may openly admit.

"I think the hospitals have a different perspective because they’re running large institutions," Kaptur said. "They have a lot of issues at stake. [Remember: Just because a nun works in a hospital, that doesn’t mean she gets to set up her own magisterium in opposition to the bishops.] They have to balance their budgets and so forth. I think that the Bishops are probably in a different position. I don’t think that they’re really managerially responsible for these institutions."

Unlike the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, [TAKE CAREFUL NOTE…] CHA is a for-profit entity, and analysts have pointed out that it would greatly benefit financially from the passage of the bill. [And?] CHA had already promised large sums of money to the Obama administration in July to help pass the legislation – before it was ever crafted.

 

I say, close their hospitals…. take the name "Catholic" away from them completely as institutions.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The Drill |
47 Comments

QUAERITUR: use of iPhone, hand-held for liturgical readings

From a reader:

One sees the Magnificat missalettes in the hands of lots of folks at daily Mass nowadays. With its beautifully presented (briefer) morning/evening/night prayers from which many (like me) have gone on to the LOH or DO, plus the daily and Sunday Mass readings, and Order of Mass including the Gloria-Credo-Sanctus etc. in Latin and English, it’s arguably one of the more wholesome phenomena of the whole Novus Ordo era.

NOW HERE’S THE QUESTION: At $20/yr download versus $40/yr for the print version, this would pay for a $100 iPhone in 5 years. And in the meantime one could use it not only for morning, evening, night prayer … But also to follow the Gloria, Creed, EP, etc. at daily and Sunday Mass. And since the Magnificat includes the readings, if and when you’re the lector . . .

Would it be liturgically acceptable to can carry your iPhone up to the ambo and proclaim the first reading and responsorial psalm directly from it, rather than from the bulky and inconvenient lectionary.

 

I have from time to time jokingly prophesied the "liturgical laptop", covered with the color of the day and solemnly carried and incensed, etc., monks in choir stalls in a dark church singing their office over glowing screens.

This will probably one day come.  But it hasn’t come yet.

I don’t think the connotation of the screen versus the book has shifted enough so that such a use wouldn’t be … wrong.

Also, I am not sure why a lectionary is inconvenient if it is already on the ambo.

That said, last night during a Solemn High Mass in the Extraordinary Form, in a very traditionally constructed church just off super modern Time Square in Manhattan, during my sermon I used my iPhone to be able to reference a prayer to St. Joseph, because I could find it any other way.  There were no books available with the text of the prayer I wanted.  I looked it up ahead of time, course, and copied it to my note pad.  But – vested in my Roman vestments – I did read from it, during the sermon.

But the readings themselves? 

Not yet, I think.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
31 Comments

NYC – Holy Innocents Church – 19 March – Solmen Mass for St. Joseph

I will be celebrant for a Solemn Mass in the Extraordinary Form at the Church of the Holy Innocents in Manhattan, NYC, on 19 March, the Feast of St. Joseph.

Posted in What Fr. Z is up to |
1 Comment

AFP: Man screams abuse at Pope Benedict XVI

UPDATE 18 March 12:52 GMT:

A reader sent this:

I read that the AFP communique was disinformation and that the man was shouting against pro-choice groups.

HERE.
___________

Pray for the Pope.

He will be more and more under attack of every kind.

From the AFP:

Man screams abuse at Pope Benedict XVI

March 18, 2010

THE Pope was verbally abused as he gave his weekly address in St Peter’s Square yesterday.

A man, apparently in his early 50s, shouted "bulls***, bulls***" while stretching an accusatory arm towards Benedict XVI, after approaching the barrier in front of the Pope’s podium.

Vatican police forcibly removed the man, still shouting, from the square.

The Pope went on to announce that he would "soon" send a pastoral letter to Irish Catholics over the paedophile priest scandal that has rocked Ireland.

The address was the first of the year to be held in St Peter’s Square, which was bathed in early spring sunshine.

Security for the 82-year-old Pope was tightened after a woman knocked him to the ground at midnight mass on Christmas Eve.

However, Vatican authorities said it would be impossible to entirely protect the Pope without putting a wall between him and the masses who come to see him.

 

Pray for the Pope and help others to do so as well.

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity, The Last Acceptable Prejudice |
15 Comments

WDTPRS POLL! Your progress through Lent: honest assessment

Passiontide is around the corner.

How are you doing with your Lent?

Your voting is entirely anonymous and, to my knowledge, cannot be traced by me or followed back.

{democracy:47}

Feel free to describe your experience, share or add tips, and give each other some encouragement as we ready ourselves for the more profound Passiontide.

Posted in LENT, POLLS | Tagged ,
39 Comments