The Feeder Feed (Old Master Edition)

I haven’t been able to post about the Feeder, which is nevertheless visible on the Z-CAM.Twitter

When I am on the road I will sometimes post about birds from other sources.

For example, here is a fine Christological Goldfinch from Siena via the Metropolitan Museum of Art in NYC!

You will recall that this species of finch, according to legend, tried to help the Crucified Jesus by landing on His head and pulling out thorns.  That is how he got his little red streak in his own head.

Therefore, when you see these finches in these paintings of Mary with the Child Jesus, you see a foreshadowing of the Crucifixion.

As a bonus feeder contribution, we can turn to a different type of critter.

Here is a great maiolica dish from Deruta, Italy, dated c. 1550-60:

I love the image and inscription.

"CHI LAVA EL CHPO ALASEN SE PERDEERANNO EL SAPONE"

"Someone who washes the head of an ass wastes his soap."

I love the Met.

Go to a museum!  You find wonderful things and learn a great deal.

Posted in The Feeder Feed | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

QUAERITUR: Catholic “seder” meal

From a reader:

If you have time this week, I was hoping you could post something about Seder meals and whether or not they are important for Catholics to have them.  It seems that I’m hearing varying responses about it.  A good friend of ours has one on Holy Thursday every year, and I’ve very much enjoyed it, seeing it as the institution of the Eucharist. 
 

I will open this to the smart WDTPRSers who may have already dug into the issue.

Frankly, it is rather foreign to my thought to have a seder meal.  Why would we do that?  Just to get to know what Jews do for Passover?

That said, I am fully prepared to eat roasted lamb on Holy Thursday, and have wine and bread … and herbs.  Horseradish would be fine.

 

I think authors are pretty divided over whether the Last Supper was like the Passover seder.  Jeremias seems to think so.  He identified some parallels between the description of the Last Supper and a seder.  I respond that it is not unusual that they ate a meal that day, had wine, and sang for awhile.  I don’t think the fact that the Lord explained what he was doing is compelling.  

Many authors will say the First Eucharist was not a seder.  Ratzinger thinks what Jesus and the disciples had was a toda meal, a thanksgiving meal of a sacrificial nature.

Also, the text that describes/prescribes the Passover seder didn’t develop until, if memory serves, the 8th c.

Furthermore, the Passover seder was to take place on Friday evening, when the Lord was in the tomb.  The Last Supper was the day before.  There was some possibility, again if memory serves, that a seder could be anticipated.  But it doesn’t make sense in this case.  Ratzinger is probably right. 

Anyway… I am not sure what having a seder is about. 

Would be be a "judaizing" gesture?  Disrespectful?

Discuss.

ADDENDUM:

Were I invited to Jewish family‘s home for their seder, and if our calendars did not conflict, I think I would accept the invitation.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , , ,
79 Comments

The perfect pew… or how to avoid the sign of peace

At Holy Innocents in Manhattan there are a few instances of the perfect pew for those who are especially disinclined to a group hug at the "sign of peace".

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes |
35 Comments

“There’s nothing to stop them”

Hey Bart!

From CNA with my emphases and comments:

Executive order on abortion funding won’t stand, Washington Post columnist says

Washington D.C., Mar 29, 2010 / 06:56 am (CNA).- Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker has denied that President Obama’s executive order barring funding for abortions is of any enforceable value, saying the legislation’s funding provisions regarding abortion are “intentionally complicated.” She predicts that abortions will be funded at Community Health Centers because of the health care bill.

Opening her Sunday column by saying abortion is the last thing she wants to talk about, she charged that the president’s executive order on abortion funding cannot override statute.

Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), who [, after stupaking,] secured the executive order in exchange for [isn’t that the same as "sold"?] his support for the legislation, has described the order as an “ironclad” ban on abortion funding.

According to Parker, defenders of the health care bill have also said the bill nowhere says funds will go towards abortion and that the Hyde Amendment prohibiting federal funding for abortion applies to the legislation.

“Both are true – up to a point. It isn’t what the bill says; it’s what it doesn’t say,” Parker continued.

While the bill does not explicitly appropriate abortion funding and uses terminology that seems to “explicitly” forbid it, she said other areas are “swampier” and funds could be use to pay for abortion as circumstances change.

She explained that the Hyde Amendment is a rider that must be attached each year to the annual appropriations bill for the Departments of Labor and Health and Human Services.

“Under its terms, it applies only to those funds,” Parker commented.

The Community Health Centers (CHCs) are not funded through this appropriations budget but rather does “an end-run around Hyde” by appropriating billions of dollars for a new “CHC Fund.” [Who’da thunk it?]

“Because the Obama administration’s ‘fix-it’ bill did not include the abortion-ban language proposed by Rep. Bart Stupak, those billions appropriated to CHCs simply are not covered by Hyde,” Parker claimed. [I wonder if she is right.]

While President Obama’s executive order purports to extend the Hyde Amendment restrictions to these dollars, she added, “regardless of Obama’s stated intentions, he can’t actually do this without an act of Congress.”

Although defenders of the bill say abortions aren’t performed at CHCs, under the new law they can, Parker argued.

There’s nothing to stop them,” she said, explaining that statute requires them to provide all required primary health care services, including those related to “obstetrics or gynecology that are furnished by physicians.”

Federal courts long have held that when a statute requires provision of health services under such broad categories, then the statute must be construed to include abortion unless it explicitly excludes it. Voila.”

“Prediction: Abortions will be performed at CHCs, you can bet your foreclosed mortgage on that,” her Washington Post column concluded. “There was always a will by this administration, and now there’s a way.”

 

 

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
8 Comments

“The impossibility of any real renewal, as long as they remain in power.”

If in following all the other great news about the Church these days you happened to miss this, take some time and have a look at Sandro Magister’s new piece about the Legionaries of Christ.

Legionaries. The "Nomenklatura" That Must Disappear

Name by name, all the top leaders of the congregation. Their extremely close connection with the founder and with his scandal. The impossibility of any real renewal, as long as they remain in power.

Posted in The future and our choices | Tagged ,
6 Comments

“…the chattering of dominant opinions…”

From a CNA wrap up about the Pope’s sermon for Palm Sunday with my emphases:

During his homily, the Holy Father emphasized that being Christian means “considering the way of Jesus Christ as the just way for being men – as that way that leads to the goal, to a fully realized and true humanity."

As Jesus walked up to Jerusalem, so we too walk up towards Heaven, "the new City of God," said the Holy Father. It is Jesus who leads us towards the heavens, towards “what is great, pure, he leads us towards the healthy air of the heights: towards the life according to the truth; towards courage that does not let itself be intimidated by the chattering of the dominant opinions; towards the patience that supports and sustains others."

He leads us to assist the abandoned and suffering, to be faithful and to kindness that is unfailing even when met with ingratitude, said the Pope. "He leads us towards love… towards God."

We walk and we are also carried, added the Pope. Jesus “pulls and sustains us" when we accept that we cannot do it alone. "The humility of ‘being with’ is essential for the ascent."

Benedict XVI said that another part of the "ascent" is the Cross. As "great results cannot be achieved without renunciation and hard exercise… [likewise] the way towards life, towards the realization of our humanity is tied to the communion with Him who went up to the height of God by way of the Cross."

The Cross, he explained, is “the expression of what love means: only he who loses himself, finds himself."

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged
4 Comments

“using the victims of clerical child abuse to fight internal political battles”

Some analysis from the UK by Damian Thompson with my emphases and comments:

Some liberal Catholics are thinking: It’s payback time, Ratzinger!

By Damian Thompson

There is still no good evidence that Pope Benedict XVI is seriously implicated in the atrocious child abuse scandals that are – rightly – blackening the reputation of the institutions of the Catholic Church. But still the attempts to join the dots continue. To put it bluntly, there is an increasingly frantic media campaign against the Pope in which headlines are being written first and then facts shaved to fit them[What’s on the masthead of Hell’s Bible again?  "All the news that fits"?]

It is also clear that many prominent liberal Catholics are turning a blind eye to this media vendetta because they don’t like Pope Benedict. [Do I hear an "Amen!"?] They are happy for him to take the rap for diocesan cover-ups initiated, in some cases, by liberal prelates. Those relates are grateful for the opportunity to pass the buck to the one man who, though his record on this matter is certainly not beyond criticism, has done more than any other to rectify the Church’s lax procedures – Joseph Ratzinger.

Some Catholics, such as our blogger Cristina Odone, have protested against the unjust treatment of the Pope. God bless her, for I know that Cristina is not sympathetic to some of the Pope’s views; yet she can spot the hidden agenda here.

I have to ask myself: if a liberal, liturgically wet Pope was castiagted unfairly in this way, would I stick up for him? I can’t be sure, but how shameful if I did not. [Do I hear an "Amen!"?]

If I was Benedict XVI, I’d be asking myself if I even wanted to visit Britain this autumn. For, when he does, he will meet English bishops, Catholic journalists and self-appointed spokesmen for the Catholic community who did not dare offend liberal opinion by defending him properly, or whose judgment was clouded by personal dislike of the Pope and his agenda.

Some Catholics – not many, but they are prominent – are actually thinking: it’s payback time, Ratzinger. If we can make this mud stick, then [and this is the moral of the story…] we can continue to sabotage your liturgical reforms. [Because everything, eventually, hinges on worship.] In other words, they are using the victims of clerical child abuse to fight internal political battles. Why am I not surprised?

I wrote the other day that…

…to a certain extent we are going to have to lie here and be kicked by anyone who walks by… until they decide that kicking someone else gets them what they want…  that and must continue to revitalize our worship of Almighty God, who alone can see us through to the other side.

The battle is vicious and the stakes are high.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , ,
54 Comments

The leader of Planned Parenthood thanks the liberal nuns

Before reading more, read this if you haven’t done so already:

Now from CNA with my emphases and comments

Planned Parenthood head thanks religious sisters for ‘critical support’ of health care bill

Washington D.C., Mar 27, 2010 / 07:28 am (CNA).- Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards has praised the Catholic religious sisters who endorsed the Senate health care bill, claiming they deserve gratitude for making “a critical demonstration of support” for a bill that significantly increased coverage of “reproductive health care.”

Writing for the Huffington Post Wednesday in her capacity as president of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, Richards claimed that it was Catholic nuns who “most importantly broke with the bishops and the Vatican to announce their support for health care reform.”  [I hope those old women are proud of themselves.]

“This brave and important move, demonstrating that they cared as much about the health care of families in America as they did about church hierarchy, was a critical demonstration of support.”

The group NETWORK claimed [lied] in a March 17 letter to the House of Representatives that it represented 59,000 women religious across the U.S. It urged members of Congress to support the bill.

Their statement was uncritically reported by the Associated Press. [uncritically] White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and others working to pass the legislation invoked the sisters’ endorsement for support[Which means that the sisters caused real scandal and did real harm.]

On March 18 U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) spokeswoman Sr. Mary Ann Walsh said NETWORK “grossly overstated” their numbers.

“The letter had 55 signatories, some individuals, some groups of three to five persons. One endorser signed twice,” she added. “There are 793 religious communities in the United States,” Sr. Walsh said.

Another group of women religious, the Council of Major Superiors of Women Religious (CMSWR), issued a statement saying it represented 10,000 sisters and supported the U.S. bishops’ criticisms of the Senate health care bill.

In her Huffington Post essay, Richards said in the last days of the debate over the health care bill, Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) and the USCCB “threatened to bring down health care completely over their narrow demands.”

Bart Stupak may not ask the nuns for advice, as he recently announced to the press, but maybe next time she should,” Richards jabbed. [Look at that sentence… it is in the Huff Post, it involves the liberal nuns, the president of Planned Parenthood, and Rep. Stupak.]

She praised Rep. Lois Capps (D-Calif.) for fighting against an “abortion ban” in the House Energy and Commerce Committee Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) gathered 41 signatures of members who pledged to vote against any final bill with the “Stupak ban.”

“These women stood in the way of plenty of men in Congress who were ready to cut a deal, whether with Bart Stupak or the National Conference of Catholic Bishops,” she continued.

Richards said Planned Parenthood was “committed” to changing the “egregious” Nelson language in the bill that President Obama signed into law on Tuesday. She claimed the bill unjustly treats abortion coverage differently than all other health care. [They claim that abortion is health care.]

However, she also said the bill was a “huge victory for women’s reproductive health” because it significantly increased insurance coverage of “reproductive health care, including family planning.” [And the euphemisms just keep coming.]

“Reproductive health care” and “women’s rights” are euphemisms common among abortion advocates.  [Speaking of euphemisms!]

Richards, the daughter of former Democratic Texas governor Ann Richards, noted that some in Congress opposed her agenda.

The simple and discouraging truth is that we have an anti-choice House of Representatives,” she claimed. [!]

She lamented that 64 Democrats voted in favor of the Stupak Amendment and that there are “too many” Republicans and Democrats in Congress opposed to “women’s rights.

“We need more than health care; we need women and men elected to office who will stand up for our health and our rights, even when it’s hard. So here’s to the women leaders in Congress — and to the nuns [Get that?] — and to the women everywhere who were counting on them. They need our gratitude and our support,” Richards’ Huffington Post essay concluded.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, The future and our choices | Tagged
69 Comments

WDTPRS – Palm Sunday (2002MR)

What Does the Prayer Really Say?  Palm Sunday – Station: St. John Lateran

 

Palm Sunday marks the beginning of Holy Week.  The Sacred Triduum (triduum from tres dies – “three day space”) were once days of obligation when people were freed from servile work so that they could attend the liturgies, once celebrated in the morning.  In the 17th century, however, the obligation was removed under the influence of changing social and religious conditions.  As a result, the faithful lost sight of these beautiful liturgies and in general only priests and religious in monasteries knew them.  In 1951 Pope Pius XII began to restore the Triduum liturgies to prominence by mandating that the Easter Vigil be celebrated in the evening.  In 1953 Mass was permitted in the evening on certain days.  A reformed Ordo for Holy Week was issued in 1955 and took effect on 25 March 1956.   That is when the Sunday of Holy Week came to be called “The Second Sunday in Passiontide, or Palm Sunday”.  Matins and Lauds (Tenebrae, “shadows”) was to be sung in the morning.  Holy Thursday Mass was not to begin before 5 p.m. and no later than 8 p.m.  The idea was to make it easier for people to attend these all important liturgies.

The principal ceremonies of the Palm Sunday Mass include the blessing of palm branches (or olive branches in some parts of the world, such as Rome) and a procession around and into the church.  In the present Missale Romanum an interesting rubric about the procession harkens to ancient times: “At a suitable hour the “collect” is made (fit collecta)in a lesser church or in another appropriate place outside the church toward which the procession marches.”  Here is our word “collect” used to describe a gathering of people.  Ultimately, the prayer of this first gathering place is the origin of the name of the prayers of Mass we are examining again this year.

Also in the rubrics there is something helpful for our understanding of “active participation”:  “Then as is customary the priest greets the people; and then there is given a brief admonition, by which the faithful are invited to participate actively and consciously (actuose et conscie participandam) in this day’s celebration.”  Those words actuose et conscie are very important.  The Second Vatican Council, when using the term actuosa participatio or “active participation”, meant interior participation, the engaging of the mind, heart and will.  The Council Fathers did not mean primarily exterior participation. 

Of course, exterior participation is the natural result of interior participation: we seek to express outwardly what we are experiencing within.  However, there is a logical priority to interior participation, which is by far the more important of the two. 

Many people working in the area of liturgy today think that active participation means that everyone has to be doing something physically active, like carrying things and singing everything.  But active participation (made possible by baptism) is primarily active receptivity, listening and watching carefully, fully engaged with mind, heart and will.  This is where true active participation begins.  For participation to be authentic, it must begin interiorly.

At the end of the procession, when everyone is gathered in the church, the priest says the…

COLLECT – LATIN TEXT (2002MR):
Omnipotens sempiterne Deus,
qui humano generi, ad imitandum humilitatis exemplum,
Salvatorem nostrum carnem sumere
et crucem subire fecisti,
concede propitius,
ut et patientiae ipsius habere documenta
et resurrectionis consortia mereamur.

The vocabulary of today’s Collect is incredibly complex.

We can only scratch at a fraction of what is there.  Our prayer was in older editions of the Missale Romanum and, before them, in the Gelasian Sacramentary.  In the Gelasian there is an extra helpful et: Salvatorem nostrum et carnem sumere, et crucem subire.  Wonderfully alliterative!  The editor of the Gelasian excludes a comma, which makes sense to me: qui humano generi_ ad imitandum…. There may be a touch of St. Augustine’s (+430) influence in the prayer.  In Augustine humilitatis appears with exemplum on close conjunction with documentum (ep. 194.3) and with documentum and patientiae in proximity to exemplum (en. ps. 29 en. 2.7).  In the context of the Passion Augustine says: “Therefore, the Lord Himself, judge of the living and the dead, stands before a human judge (Pilate), offering us a decisive lesson of humility and patience (humilitatis et patientiae documentum), not defeated, but giving the soldier an example of how one wages war (pugnandi exemplum): …”

There are two words for “example” here: exemplum…documenta. These words appear together in numerous classical and patristic texts. Our startlingly useful Lewis & Short Dictionary informs us that our old friend exemplum means, “a sample for imitation, instruction, proof, a pattern, model, original, example….”  Exemplum is a term in ancient rhetoric, an inseparable part of the warp and weft of the development of Christian doctrine during the first millennium. 

For Fathers of the Church, all well-trained in rhetoric, exemplum identified a range of things including man as God’s image, Christ as a Teacher, and the content of prophecy.   In Greek and Roman rhetoric and philosophy, an exemplum could have auctoritas, “authority”, the persuasive force of an argument.  When we hear today’s prayer with ancient ears, exemplum is not merely an “example” to be followed: it indicates a past event with such authoritative force that it transforms him who imitates it.  Today we hear humilitatis exemplum, the authoritative model of humility who is Christ – Christ in action, or rather Christ in Passion, undergoing His sufferings for our sake.  This becomes the foundational and authoritative pattern of the Christian experience: self-emptying in the Incarnation and Passion leading to resurrection.   Exemplum is augmented later in the prayer by documentaDocumentum is also a “pattern for imitation” like exemplum but also in some contexts having the meaning of “a proof”, that is, a concrete demonstration that what is asserted is true: evidence.   In this case it is a paradigm after which we are to pattern and shape our own lives.  But this pattern or model itself actually has power to shape us.  Christ transforms us the baptized who are made in his image and likeness, after his perfect exemplum, and who imitate His exempla and documenta, His words and deeds. 

Consortium (from con-sors… having the same lot/fate/destiny with something or someone) classically is a “community of goods” and “fellowship, participation, society.”  Habere has a vast entry in the L&S.  The common meaning is “have”, but it also indicates concepts like “hold, account, esteem, consider, regard” as well as “have as a habit, peculiarity, or characteristic.”  Habere is doing double-duty with two objects, documenta and consortia.  This is why I use both “grasp” for the first application of habere and “have” for the second.  The meanings of the two different objects draw our two different senses of habere.   Patientia is from patior, “to bear, support, undergo, suffer, endure”, and it carries all its connotations as well as the meaning “patience”.  This is where the word “Passion” comes from.  We could say here, “examples of His long-suffering” or “exemplary patterns of His patient forbearance.”  Finally, note that nostrum goes with Salvatorem and not with carnem: caro, carnis is feminine and the form would have to have been nostram carnem.

LITERAL TRANSLATION:
Almighty eternal God,
who, for the human race,
made our Savior both assume flesh and undergo the Cross
for an example of humility to be imitated,
graciously grant,
that we may be worthy to grasp both the lessons of His forbearance
and also have shares in the resurrection.

More can be said about that phrase patientiae ipsiusIpse, a demonstrative pronoun, is emphatic and means “himself, herself, itself”.  Could we personify patientia to mean, “grasp the lessons of Patience itself” or even “of Patience Himself”?   That would be poetically sublime. 

In the fullness of time the Second Person of the Trinity, God the Son, the eternal Word through whom all things visible and invisible were made, by the will of the Father emptied Himself of His glory and took our human nature up into an indestructible bond with His own divinity.  He came to us sinners to save us from our sins and teach us who we are (cf. Gaudium et spes 22).  This saving mission began with self-emptying (in Greek kenosis).   Fathom for a moment the humility of the Savior, emptying Himself of His divine splendor, submitting Himself to His humble and hidden life before His public ministry.   When the time of His years and His mission was complete He gave Himself over again, emptying Himself yet again even to giving up His very life.   Every moment of Jesus earthly life, every word and deed, are conditioned by humility.   This is our perfect example to follow, an example so perfect that it has the power to transform us. 

As Holy Week begins and the Sacred Triduum is observed, come to the sacramental observance of the sacred and saving mysteries with humble self-emptying.  Make room for Christ.

 

Posted in WDTPRS | Tagged
4 Comments

In Philadelphia: “A Burlap Church No More”

Brick by brick, folks.

From the Weekpress.com of Philadelphia.

This is pretty long, so I will just give you the link. Here is the title:

A Burlap Church No More

Read and come back to discuss what you think is important.

Posted in Brick by Brick | Tagged
43 Comments