A note about registration

Because I am having total internet disaster here – typical Roman/Vatican techno fubar stuff, and typical apathy from those with their hands on the levers – approval of registrations is pretty far down on my list.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on A note about registration

McBrien is back, and venting for the Fishwrap

The National catholic Fishwrap has for many dark years offered columns by the not-yet-late Richard McBrien. His writings should usually be ignored, but this piece is such a good example of liberal whining and deception that it merits attention for its educational value, if nothing else.

I understand McBriend has been fighting cancer or some other dire condition. I have offered prayers for him and I had hoped his sufferings would have sobered him up. Alas, it seems that he is still drunk with modernism and the intoxicating “spirit” of You Know What.

Let’s have a look at his latest rubbish:

Showing support for LCWR during these trying times
Richard McBrien

It’s old news by now, but I want to add my name to the already long list of people who have supported the Leadership Conference of Women Religious against the Vatican and its allies in North America.[I think he should take a long bus ride with some of them.]
The nuns have been in the forefront of the struggle to keep the spirit and the letter of the Second Vatican Council alive, [He may be old and ill, but he still slithers with the best of them. ‘Spirit’, as in the ‘spirit of Vatican II’ perhaps, but the ‘letter’? Noooo….] not only in religious communities of women but also in the Catholic church at large.

Unfortunately, LCWR is a scapegoat for everything the right wing in the Catholic church loathes. [Yes, I think the ‘right wing’ does loathe dissent, infidelity, heterodoxy, scandal, support for abortion, liturgical abuses, running down devotion to the Lord in the Blessed Sacrament, intellectual dishonesty…. ] One should recognize that ultra-conservatives exist in the highest ranks of the Vatican, excluding no ecclesiastical office in the church. [For him, ‘ultra’ probably includes anyone who can happily embrace what the Catechism of the Catholic Church contains.]

As I said (to a standing ovation) [Because it’s all about you. Aren’t you wonderful?] at the symposium held in my honor [I wasn’t invited. Oh well…. Hey, wasn’t there some sort of problem in the theology department at ND when he was chairman? Seems to me I read something about that. Maybe readers could look that up on the interwebs.] at the University of Notre Dame toward the end of April, few North American Catholics would be Catholics today if it were not for the nuns. [Some might suggest that there are fewer now because of them.] The nuns, I insisted (to another standing ovation), are the greatest asset to the church in North America, and one hopes and prays that the Vatican will soon come to realize that as well. [If only ‘the Vatican’ could be as savvy as he is!]

The nuns are not only among the leaders in the church who wish the keep alive the spirit and the letter [There’s that ‘letter’ again. He simply advances it as if it were true. We can grant that Fishwrapers like a few points of the texts of the Council. But they don’t demonstrate that they embrace all of them.] of the Second Vatican Council, but are also among the thousands who are celebrating with the rest of the church the 50th anniversary of the council’s opening in the fall of 1962.

The council brought fresh air into the church, just as Pope John XXIII had hoped, but neither he nor his closest friends could have foreseen the terrible backlash he would also unleash.[What was it Paul VI said also came into the Church?]

He couldn’t have foreseen, for example, the concerted efforts of his successors, Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI, to undermine the council, consciously or not, by the appointment of bishops and archbishops unfriendly to the council. [B as in B. S as in S. John Paul … unfriendly to the Council? By his appointment of bishops? Benedict? That is absurd. Then again, their choices must be mysterious to those who don’t really care much about the ‘letter’ of the Council or about all those other Councils before 1962.]

[Ahhhh…. a list. Didn’t Nixon make lists? And Obama?] Examples of such bishops are (with the diocese and year they were first ordained a bishop): Thomas Welsh, Arlington, Va., 1970 (now deceased); Thomas Daily, Brooklyn, N.Y., 1974 (now retired); Nicholas DiMarzio, Brooklyn, 1996; David Ricken, Green Bay, Wis., 2000; Richard Lennon, Cleveland, 2001.

Examples of such archbishops are: John Myers, Newark, N.J., 1987; Joseph Kurtz, Louisville, Ky.,1999; Jose Gomez, Los Angeles, 2001; Francis George, Chicago, 1990; Charles Chaput, Philadelphia, 1988; Edward Egan, New York, 1985 (now retired).

Nor could John XXIII have foreseen the wholesale assault on the nuns of the United States, not only in the “visitation” of the sisters’ communities, but also in the investigation of LCWR, which has been the source of so much good for the U.S. church.[Another absurdity. Some years ago Vatican Radio, on its local Roman broadcast, each afternoon played speeches and homilies of Popes from their archives. The addresses of John XXIII gave a different impression from the avuncular Santa Claus he is usually portrayed as having been. He came across, frankly, as being as hard as nails in those speeches. I think John XXIII would have ground the LCWR into the gutter with his red shoes and washed them into the Tiber. Does anyone here really imagine that John XXIII would have put up with nuns acting as escorts at abortion clinics? Nuns promoting the new age BS they have involved themselves in? Would he have smiled at the speakeresses at the last few LCWR meetings, including wacko stuff about cosmic evolution and presentations by open lesbians? Would he have condosned giving awards to the like of Sandra Schneiders? It is to laugh.]

Neither could he have foreseen the demoralization that has set into the Catholic church nowadays, with many Catholics looking forlornly at the Second Vatican Council as if it never happened and the pontificate of John XXIII as if he never existed.[Let’s buy this buy a box of tissues. Booo hooo. Did guys like this care for two seconds about the sensibilities of millions of the faithful who watched liberals like him tear their Church and churches to pieces before their very eyes? All in the name of the ‘spirit’, not the ‘letter’, of the Council? What a crock.]

The bishops appointed by John Paul II and Benedict XVI insist they support the council, but that the council was misinterpreted by progressive Catholics. Progressive Catholics, on the other hand, feel the recent crop of bishops overemphasize the abortion issue to the practical exclusion of the church’s traditional emphasis on social justice [This is getting to tiresome, isn’t it? This liberals pretend that anyone who upholds the right to be born is THE fundamental justice issue are really unsophisticated. They aren’t as nuanced as these lefties who can see the big picture and, therefore, set aside the lives of the unborn. What gives the lie to McBrien’s point is that people like Sr. Simone Campbell won’t even answer direct questions about abortion.] and the needs of the poor, which the Nuns on the Bus have highlighted. [In the end he gets around to it. I suspect this is all about supporting Obama.]

We cannot overemphasize the fact that a pall of sadness now covers the church. [puhleez] Many have dropped out (the recent Pew poll disclosed that ex-Catholics constitute one-tenth of the U.S. religious landscape); others stay because they have found a worshiping community that meets their spiritual needs (usually on a college or university campus, where the long arms of a bishop cannot reach). [I think there are some empty Anglican or Episcopalian churches available. ]

But I have not given up hope — nor should you, my readers. [CUE MUSIC] The nuns (including LCWR) will eventually be vindicated, a new pope will be elected who the electors think is only a seat-warmer (just as they once regarded John XXIII), and the pendulum will swing the other way. It always has. [Those meds must be pretty good.]

Some of us will never see the change, like the saintly Moses, but it will come. [Ah! The Promised Land after the desert.] As John XXIII insisted, history is the great teacher of life. And history has much to teach us. [And what a great historian McBrien has been.]

PS: I had to do this entirely from my iPhone, which was a chore. Forgive typos for format problems.

Posted in Liberals, Magisterium of Nuns, Pò sì jiù, The Drill, Throwing a Nutty, Vatican II, Women Religious | Tagged
66 Comments

Breakfast of Campioni

I am staying near the Borgo Pio, which puts me in range of too good bars. For those unfamiliar with Rome, a bar is not what we think of as a bar in the USA. You can get spirits at a bar, but coffee is more likely your objective, and you often stand a a counter, consume, and dash.

Today, my usual breakfast of a capucc’io, cornetto (semplice… I’m not much for the fillings) and fruit juice, often apricot.

20121103-095104.jpg
Some Roman old timers will recognize this.

20121103-095239.jpg
Which is, of course, in here.

20121103-095330.jpg
A view up the all too familiar street.

20121103-095420.jpg
Another Borgo Pio landmark is this fountain next to the restaurant Mozzicone (which unfortunately means cigarette butt).

20121103-095549.jpg
Sometimes the larger Roman water fountains will tell you what their source it. This one has Acqua Marcia.

20121103-095651.jpg
There are several different waters that flow through the ancient aquafers. The water is quite hard, but it is delicious. When in Rome don’t hesitate to drink from a flowing water source.

BTW… I am still, alas, working solely from my phone. I was told that ever since the Synod, there have been problems with connecting for certain operating systems. It was an odd explanation, but… hey… when you are helpless, that’s the way it goes. At least my phone is working. I have even tried a mobile USB broadband connection. Truly terrible. (I don’t need suggestions, btw, just prayers.)

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
7 Comments

Fishwrap’s hissy fit over Beattie

The Fishwrap is having a spittle-flecked nutty about the decision in San Diego not to let the wacko speak in a Catholic institution.

University withdraws theologian’s invitation after pressure from financial contributors
Joshua J. McElwee | Nov. 1, 2012

The University of San Diego has canceled a visiting fellowship for a British theologian less than two weeks before her scheduled arrival at the university because of pressure from financial contributors, according to a letter from the university’s president.

Tina Beattie, a professor of Catholic studies at London’s private University of Roehampton known for her work in contemporary ethical issues and Catholic understandings of feminism, received notice of the cancellation Oct. 27. She was scheduled to take residence at the university on Tuesday. [Isn’t this the wacko, one of the board of The Tablet, who said that Mass was like a male homosexual act?  No, really… isn’t this the same person?]

Beattie — who also serves on the board of directors of the British Catholic weekly The Tablet [as I thought] and is a theological adviser to the Catholic Agency For Overseas Development, the Catholic aid agency for England and Wales — announced the withdrawal of the invitation in an email to friends and other theologians Thursday.

Beattie said in an interview with NCR that cancellation of her fellowship was “symptomatic of something very new and very worrying.” [Perhaps that she is sort of… well… not exactly orthodox in her work as a “theologian”?]

“It’s unheard of, certainly in Britain, for a theologian in my position to feel threatened by this kind of action,” Beattie said. [Boo hoo!] “It’s not about me; it’s about some change in the culture of the Catholic church that we should be very, very concerned about.” [Panic, liberal.]

Prominent theologians [Says who?] in the U.S. and the UK called the university’s treatment of Beattie “an insult” and “dispiriting” and worried that it might have a chilling effect in the academic world. [We’ve seen this movie before, decades back, and it ain’t The Bells of St. Mary’s!] Several said they had written directly to university president Mary Lyons about the matter.

Calls to the University of San Diego for comment were not immediately returned Thursday.

Beattie said she was notified that her invitation to be a fellow at the university’s Frances G. Harpst Center for Catholic Thought and Culture had been withdrawn in a letter from Lyons. (The letter can be read in full at the end of the article.)

In Lyons’ letter, which Beattie shared in her email, Lyons writes that Beattie publicly dissents from church teaching.

“The Center’s primary mission, consistent with those who have financially supported the Center, is to provide opportunities to engage the Catholic intellectual tradition in its diverse embodiments,” Lyons wrote.

“This would include clear and consistent presentations concerning the Church’s moral teachings, teaching with which you, as a Catholic theologian, dissent publicly. In light of the contradiction between the mission of the Center and your own public stances as a Catholic theologian, I regretfully rescind the invitation that has been extended to you.”

In the letter, Lyons offers to reimburse Beattie for travel-related expenses and says she and the university “hope to mitigate any inconvenience this decision may have created for you.” [So, they will pay her not to come, and she will take the money.  Watch.]

[…]

There’s more over of this panicked drivel at Fishwrap, but don’t waste your time.

Posted in Liberals, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , ,
15 Comments

On The Hunt For Cacio

After a Pontifical Requiem in Rome on All Souls on a Friday, the reasonable thing to do eat is something pre-Columban.

Cacio e pepe!

A starter for us to share, first.

20121102-233435.jpg
Then the famous pasta dish.

20121102-233518.jpg
I had my favorite orata.

20121102-233624.jpg
There is more to it than that, as it turns out.

20121102-233709.jpg
Lots of conversation with old friends and about old friends.

What didn’t come across from my photos of the Mass was that the bishop celebrant preached in Latin. More importantly, a child I baptized helped as a young usher to take up the collection!

BTW one of the the people I dined with tonight happens to be, probably, the best tour guide in Rome. Among the languages he has, is English. He will accept small private parties. So if you want a tour in Rome… I’m just sayin’…

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged
6 Comments

Solemn Requiem… Pontifical

When did you last see this?

20121102-183650.jpg
Or

20121102-184057.jpg
Jammed.

20121102-185646.jpg

20121102-192126.jpg

20121102-192545.jpg

20121102-200032.jpg

20121102-200051.jpg

20121102-200302.jpg

20121102-200401.jpg

Posted in Benedict XVI, Four Last Things, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, SESSIUNCULA, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices, Vatican II, Year of Faith | Tagged , ,
34 Comments

Another example of liberal panic

When I was last in London, about a month ago, people were talking about the good decision to deny Tina Beattie a speaking gigantic a Catholic institution in Bristol.

Now we see this in The Guardian:

US university accused of ‘Sovietisation’ of Catholic intellectual life
University of San Diego rescinded visiting fellow invitation to liberal theologian who has argued case for same-sex marriage

Tina Beattie, who has argued case for same-sex marriage on grounds that she ‘dissents publicly’ from Church’s moral teachings.
Lizzy Davies
guardian.co.uk, Thu 1 Nov 2012

A leading [according to …?] British historian has accused a US university of “colluding in the Sovietisation” of Roman Catholic intellectual life after it rescinded an invitation to a prominent liberal theologian who has argued the case for same-sex marriage on the grounds that she “dissent[s] publicly” from the Church’s moral teachings.
Tina Beattie, director of the Digby Stuart Research Centre for Catholic Studies at Roehampton University, was one of 27 theologians, clerics and activists who earlier this year wrote a letter to the Times arguing that Catholics could, “using fully informed consciences … support the legal extension of civil marriage to same-sex couples.”
The intervention, in August, prompted an outcry from traditionalists and led to the cancellation of a lecture Beattie was due to give in Bristol.
It has now emerged that Beattie, who had been invited to be a visiting fellow and give public lectures at the University of San Diego this winter, has had that invitation rescinded by the Catholic institution, whose president said Beattie’s “public stances” were not in keeping with the campus. [Excellent!] The decision, which Beattie learned of last week and which she made public on Thursday, has sparked criticism from theologians on both sides of the Atlantic.
Eamon Duffy, [I am not that surprised that he is on the wrong side of this.] professor of the History of Christianity at Cambridge, has urged the university to reconsider. “It is deeply dispiriting that the president of a Catholic university should characterise academic discussion and debate among Catholics as ‘dissent’, and should seek to suppress academic exchange by black-balling an individual whom the church has not condemned,” he wrote in a letter to the university’s president, Mary Lyons.
Comparing her stance unfavourably with that of Cardinal Newman, [?!?!] who “deplored similar attempts to silence discussion in the church”, he concluded: “I fear that by publicly withdrawing this invitation, the University of San Diego has brought academic ignominy on itself, and is colluding in the Sovietisation [This must like Godwin’s Law.] of Catholic intellectual life which many feel is one of the saddest features of the contemporary church.”
Beattie said that, while the exact reasons for the cancellation of her San Diego visit have not been given, [NB] she had been the target of an online “blog campaign” by her critics ever since the letter in the Times, and that the controversy had spread to the US. The Clifton lecture, she added, had been cancelled following an outcry by protesters and a subsequent intervention by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), the body which oversees Catholic doctrine and is seen by many as having become more authoritarian under Pope Benedict XVI, as well as less tolerant of aspects of the Catholic Church for England and Wales.
“I think it’s a really important time for the Church in this country because we have so far been not divided by this kind of ugly rupture,” Beattie told the Guardian, calling on the Catholic Bishops of England and Wales to show a “very strong united front” in the face of any attempt to stifle dissent. “There’s been a creative atmosphere of people being able to hold different positions in this country without it causing this kind of ugliness and I really think it’s vital that the Bishops collectively stand up to protect that now.” [This is a great example of the panic many liberals are feeling as they feel the ground shifting under them. Thing are changing in the UK episcopate.]
The row over Beattie comes amid reports that the prefect of the CDF, Archbishop Gerhard Ludwig Mueller, intends [NB] to clamp down on the pastoral provision – supported by Archbishop Vincent Nichols – given to gay Christians by the so-called Soho Masses in London. The German magazine Katholishches reported last month that Mueller, who was appointed by the pope in July, was determined to tackle the services, which are a unique and much-cherished feature of the gay community.
In an email to Beattie, Lyons said that the invitation to be a visiting fellow at the university’s Frances G Harpst Center for Catholic Thought and Culture was being rescinded “after great and thoughtful consideration” because of what was deemed the contradiction between Beattie’s beliefs and the centre’s mission. “This [fellowship] would include clear and consistent presentations concerning the Church’s moral teachings, teachings with which you, as a Catholic theologian, dissent publicly,” she added.
On her blog, Beattie said: “The cancellation of my visit is not the most important issue in all this. The real issues are academic freedom, the vocation of lay theologians in relation to the official magisterium, and the power of a hostile minority of bloggers (some of whom are ordained deacons and priests) to command the attention and support of the CDF. The latter is the most sinister development of all, and it is a cause for scandal which brings the church into disrepute. However, it also shows how deep this crisis has become.” [See what I mean?]

Posted in Brick by Brick, Liberals, New Evangelization, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
63 Comments

Of Conjunctions, Cornetti, and Corollaries

Last night there was a beautiful conjunction of your planet’s moon with the gas giant Jupiter. My phone photos don’t do it justice.

20121102-103002.jpg

20121102-103011.jpg
The stars are not conjoined for my internet connection however. This morning I am working my Internet problem. My mobile phone connects without a hitch, but my laptop simply will not connect. I will bypass the problem and get a USB gizmo from Vodadone. Better than nothing, and some if you were good to me with donations, which makes the cost less irritating.

One thing you learn when you’ve spent a lot of time in Rome: things rarely work without a hitch and the solution normally requires the one thing you don’t have with you. This is the place where I developed Zuhlsdorf’s Law: in the moment you need technology to work, that is when it will fail, and the depth of the failure is proportioned to the urgency of the need. I am sure you have all ha the experience of trying to show some how something works. That is when it won’t work. That’s Zuhlsdorf’s Law. Corollary: Murphy was an optimist.

In the meantime, breakfast:

20121102-103519.jpg

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Lighter fare, On the road, SESSIUNCULA, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
3 Comments

Feast Day Supper for All Saints

Dining alone is not my favorite thing, but I am tired. I wanted to read and lick my wounds. Internet problems. Perfect a month ago. Today total failure. I don’t want to do the whole week from my phone. But I digress.

At a nearby, always good, always dependable place, …

Rigatoni con sugo di coda vaccinara. Abundant! The cook says 125g of pasta.

20121101-205405.jpg

20121101-205421.jpg

20121101-205427.jpg
For dessert, one of my favorite seasonal things on the face of the earth, Puntarelle! These had less anchovies than I like, but they hit the spot.

20121101-205702.jpg
After, they offered some homemade amaro.

20121101-205800.jpg
Not bad.

Beautiful feast day.

Pontifical Mass.

Roman food.

Now for some serious rack time… though I may have to fisk something ere I can sleep.

Gratitude and prayers for those who made the trip possible.

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen, On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged , ,
16 Comments

Pontifical Mass at SS Trinità dei Pellegrini

On my arrival in Roma I wended my way to this famous church where St Philip established a confraternity. Card Branmueller has just begun the Confiteor.

20121101-104013.jpg
PS Faldstool
20121101-104431.jpg
UPDATE:

As usual, no row by row Communion.

20121101-114834.jpg
Acts of thanksgiving at side altars. Thank You, Lord, that we weren’t forced by someone with a microphone to sing some ditty.

20121101-115337.jpg
Reposing the Blessed Sacrament.

20121101-115530.jpg
Eamus!

20121101-120344.jpg

20121101-121312.jpg

Posted in New Evangelization, On the road, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged
20 Comments