QUAERITUR: changing “non sum dignus” to “digna”

From a reader:

I have a question that arises from something I overheard at an FSSP Mass this morning. When the priest turned to the congregation with the Blessed Sacrament and said "Ecce Agnus Dei, ecce qui tollit peccata mundi", and the congregation responded with the "Domine, non sum dignus", the elderly lady sitting next to me said "Domine, non sum digna", substituting the feminine adjectival ending to match her own gender (this was clearly audible during all three iterations).

I was quite impressed with her knowledge of Latin, but when I mentioned the incident to a seminarian of my acquaintance he seemed to think this innovation was pretty much on a par with people in the NO Mass substituting entirely different words in the vernacular texts, and thus, by implication, not licit. What would your take on this be?

I think the texts should be read as they are.

If you are going to make responses at Mass, say the texts as they are written. 

This is not just because this particular phrase is from Scripture, but because the Mass texts constitute their own theological locus.

I can understand the desire to make the texts your own.  On the other hand, the baptized person participating at Mass speaks with Christ’s voice and makes Christ’s gestures when it falls to him or her to speak and move.  The Church’s texts must be respected when it is time to speak.

Also, changing a text like that might subtly reinforce the idea that "it’s Father’s Mass".  In other words, "It doesn’t matter what I do, since he is saying the correct text up there.  I can say what I want to make it more meaningful to me."

I don’t think a woman saying digna rather than dignus is terribly harmful.  In the large scheme of things, this wouldn’t be among those cares I would worry over.   Still, I think the texts should be read as they are for various reasons.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
44 Comments

QUAERITUR: wronging a priest and confession

From a reader:

If one has wronged a priest, in such way as that the wrong should be confessed sacramentally, ought one
    * to approach that priest, if possible before any other
    * to approach some other priest at all costs
    * not worry, just go to one’s usual confessor even if it was him
    * ?

No, you don’t have to go to confession to him on this point.  But you do have to make amends.

Also, if he is the only priest around, and the alternative would be not going to confession for a long time, then you should simply go to him for your confession.

Keep in mind that in wronging a priest, you are not simply wronging a man.  You wrong a man who has sacred orders.  Depending on how you wronged that priest, you may also have to confess the sin of sacrilege.

Sometimes wrongful actions are more than one sin at once.  Anytime something or some place or someone consecrated is involved, you usually also are committing a sacrilegious act in harming them.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
17 Comments

2nd Sunday of Lent – a sermon

Here is a sermon for the 2nd Sunday of Lent (2002 Missale Romanum)

Posted in PRAYERCAzT: What Does The (Latin) Prayer Really Sound L |
Comments Off on 2nd Sunday of Lent – a sermon

Heavens Above! ISS TOOLBAG

From a reader:

Lenten greetings in Christ!  I hope this finds you well.  Thank you so much for a splendid and edifying blog.
 
Having noted your interest in things astronomical in the past, I thought you might be intrigued by a relatively new feature of the Heavens Above website: http://www.heavens-above.com/

In the section that gives you tracking data on various satellites and the ISS, there is now a link that provides information on visible passes of the famous ISS toolbag

The information provided for each pass includes the exact time, coordinates, magnitude of the toolbag, and a star map showing the path.  The map, in particular, is handy, and I have not found it on other similar websites. 
 
Otherwise, either you or your readers might be interested to whip out the binoculars and look for the bag!

Posted in Just Too Cool |
10 Comments

PODCAzT 80: Gaudium et spes 9-10; don Camillo (Part V); SSPXer voicemail

On this Saturday in the 1st Week of Lent, we have a reading from Gaudium et spes, the “Pastoral” Constitution on the Church in the Modern World from the Second Vatican Council.

GS 9-10 is the second reading in the Office of Readings in the Liturgia horarum.

This is a highly controversial document.  First, it is hard to say what a “Pastoral” Constitution is in contrast to a “Dogmatic” Constitution such as Dei Verbum. People on both ends of the debate over Gaudium et spes have strong positions.  Some say GS is infected with “modernism” or is too centered on man.  Others turn GS and other conciliar documents into “super-dogma”.

Whatever your side is, Gaudium et spes is fascinating.  It can be read benignity or with hostility.  But we should read it critically, in the best sense.  Even the present Pope Benedict XVI in years past has strong negative criticisms of Gaudium et spes.

I will talk about these things and more.

Also, we have another installment of stories about the fictional don Camillo Tarocci, (+ A.D. … ?) parish priest of “The Little World” created by Giovanni Guareschi.

I began a to read stories from The Little World of Don Camillo back in PODCAzT 65.  There is a Don Camillo tag you can use to find the others easily.

These delightful pieces are set in post-war Nothern Italy.

They blend brilliant insight into the human condition with solid applied Catholic Faith. 

Today we hear two tales:

The Return to the Fold
and
The Defeat

Finally, I have an interesting voicemail from a layman in the USA who attends a chapel of the SSPX.  He has observations about the blog, SSPXers, and being a Catholic.

https://zuhlsdorf.computer/podcazt/09_03_07.mp3

Not sure if the iTunes feed is working.  It stops and starts again… mysteriously.  Beats me!

Some of the last offerings (check out the PODCAzT PAGE):

Posted in don Camillo, PODCAzT | Tagged , , ,
58 Comments

POLL: When was the last time you went to confession?

Jesus Christ, God and Savior, gave us the Sacrament of Penance, of Reconciliation.

This is the ordinary means by which He desires us to seek forgiveness for our actual, post-baptismal sins.

There is no sin that any limited little mortal can commit which is so bad that God cannot forgive it.

Christ gave His own power to forgive sins to the Church He established, the Catholic Church.

Priests exercise this ministry in the Church, with the Church’s permission, acting by virtue of their ordination, as "another Christ".

When you confess your sins to a priest and he gives you absolution, your sins are taken away… not merely covered over or set aside.  They are no more.  You may remember them in sorrow, but they no longer harm your relationship with God.

Mortal sins break your saving friendship with God.  Mortal sin places you at risk of eternal separation from God and the happiness of heaven… forever.

Confession and absolution repairs that rupture and returns you to a state of friendship with God.

Awareness of mortal sin should drive you to a confessional.

In our weakness we will sometimes put off going to confession.  Perhaps fear or embarrassment keeps us away.   Time slips by.  Days become weeks become months become years. 

Then you die and go to your judgment.

So … maybe the priest is not friendly or the confession schedule is a little narrow…. so what?  A better confessor is some distance away… so?  It is a little hard… not convenient… too much to do….  And?

What is a moment of embarrassment, what is an interruption of your oh-so-important routine compared to the eternity of heaven or of hell?

You do not know the moment when your reckoning will come, friends.

Have you fallen into the trap, willingly or innocently, of going to "general absolution" without making a confession of your sins in the proper way?

The Sacrament of Penance heals your soul, strengthens you against sin, and – simply on the basic level of peace of mind – works wonders.

I will never forget one somewhat slow afternoon in a confessional… just a bit bored…  I heard someone get in and slid open the window.  "Bless me Father, I have sinned.  It has been sixty years since my last confession…."

When we were finished he wept and said "I’m free."

POLL CLOSED

Our question:

When was the last time you went to confession?

  • Within the last week (34%, 1,194 Votes)
  • Within the last month (31%, 1,115 Votes)
  • Within the last six months (20%, 719 Votes)
  • Within the last year (4%, 152 Votes)
  • More than a year ago (4%, 146 Votes)
  • More than ten years ago (2%, 71 Votes)
  • More than five years ago (2%, 70 Votes)
  • More than twenty-five years ago (2%, 58 Votes)
  • Not since my first confession (1%, 24 Votes)

Total Voters: 3,549

Posted in POLLS |
150 Comments

WDTPRS: Saturday 1st Week of Lent – Post communionem (2002MR)

We continue our project of looking at the Post communions of Lent:

Saturday – 1st Week of Lent

There is something pretty outrageous to note about this day’s prayer.  Read to the end.

This prayer is found in the ancient Gelasian Sacramentary on "Feria septima" of Lent, the 7th day of Lent.  In the Veronese this prayer is found among the prayers for the admonition during September month to fast during the 10th month (October).  Remember how the numbering of the months got screwed up in earlier centuries. It has an interesting spelling variation in the Veronese.  Whereas the Gelasian had "fauore", nothing unusual there, the Veronese has "fabore".  These variations show us something about how Latin was pronouced.  The intervocalic v, u, b sounds are related, with differences of lip rounding and closing the lips to make the sounds.  Try it!  favore fauore fabore

This prayer was not in the pre-Conciliar Missale Romanum.

POST COMMUNIONEM
Perpetuo, Domine, favore prosequere,
quos reficis divino mysterio,
et, quos imbuisti caelestibus institutis,
salutaribus comitare solaciis.

Do not be fooled by prosequere, which is an imperative, not an infinitive.  Prosequor is deponent and means "to follow" or "to accompany".  It can also be "to follow up".   The same goes for comitare, which is from the deponent comitor, "to join one’s self to any one as an attendant, to accompany, attend, follow".  So, two verbs of accompanying, both deponent imperatives.  An elegant hand wrote this.  Note also the devision of salutaribus… solaciis with comitare.

SLAVISHLY LITERAL VERSION:
O Lord, with perpetual good will follow up on those
whom you are refreshing by means of the divine mystery,
and
accompany with saving consolations
those whom you have imbued with heavenly things that were instituted.

I literally tripled-checked to make sure I had the right day, after I read what follows.

Lame-Duck ICEL Version (1973):
Lord,
may the word we share
be our guide to peace in your kingdom.
May the food we receive
assure us of your constant love.

Okay folks… can you do better than the Lame-Duck ICEL Version?

(And don’t try to take credit for your 7-year old’s work.  I’ll know.)

Posted in LENT, WDTPRS |
12 Comments

QUAERITUR: blessed salt

saltFrom a reader:

Recently a Protestant friend of mine sent me an article you might find interesting about someone hawking “Christian salt.” I don’t know much about the Catholic tradition of blessed salt, except that my mom keeps some near her statue of St. Philomena. The salt in this article is blessed by an Episcopal priest. Apparently the “inventor” dreamed it up as an alternative to the Kosher salt those TV chefs are always talking about.  “An unspecified percentage of the revenue will go toward supporting Christian charities, and if the line proves profitable, Godlewski will attempt to expand the product line with Christian branded rye, pickles and bagels, reports Examiner.com.”
Hmmmm. At best this seems like a tacky attempt at creating a sacramental. At worst, it borders on simony and anti-semitism. What do you think? Is blessed salt a legitimate devotion? Do kosher delis undermine Christian culture?

My comments:

I don’t think this has any anti-Semitic dimension.  Kosher salt is used in cooking.  It has a larger grind, or grain.  It is “kosher” or “koshering” salt, not because it’s kosher in itself but because it is used in the processing of kosher meats.  It usually doesn’t have additives, which is why it is handy in cooking.  It is amazing, by the way, how many different sorts of culinary salt you can get, and how different they taste.

The episcopal priest do what he wants, but the salt is not blessed.  Only someone with valid priestly orders can bless this with constitutive blessings.

But he can commit a sin of scandal by giving the impression of peddling sacred things.

But if he could bless the salt and make it a sacramental, it would be a sacrilege to sell it.

In ancient times (as today) salt was extremely important.  People depended on it for health.  Without the right balance of salt our bodies cannot regulate body moisture properly.  It was precious at times.  The Romans named an important road after salt, the Via Salaria, for salt trade – tied to Rome’s very earliest origins.  Roman soldiers would sometimes be paid in salt, thus “salary” in English.  Think about the upheavals in India when a tax was imposed on salt, and Ghandi led a protest illegally to make salt at the ocean.

Salt is all over Scriptures, from the lot of Lot’s wife to Our Lord calling His disciples the “salt of the earth”.

In the Old Testament God established a covenant of salt with the people.  Cf. Numbers 18:19: “All the firstfruits of the sanctuary which the children of Israel offer to the Lord, I have given to thee and to thy sons and daughters, by a perpetual ordinance. It is a covenant of salt for ever before the Lord, to thee and to thy sons.”  Remember, salt was precious.  When you shared salt with someone, you created a bond between you.

We say that someone is “worth his salt”.  That also means that he is esteemed.  You would invite someone your favor to sit closer to the salt cellar cellar on the table.  You would invite him even to “come a little higher”, as Christ speaks of in the parable in Luke 14:10.

Salt is a sign of a bond, but also of permanence, because salt preserves food and keeps water from getting nasty with algae.  In Leviticus 2:13 God tells the Jews that all their offerings must also have salt.  Salt is, in a sense, something that is irrevocable.

The Lord’s words then about His disciples as being salt, and His warning about salt “losing its flavor”, take on greater meaning.  There is a permanence expected in discipleship.

St. Paul talks about how, when we answer people, our words should be “salty”: “sermo vester semper in gratia sale sit conditus ut sciatis quomodo oporteat vos unicuique respondere… Let your speech be always in grace seasoned with salt: that you may know how you ought to answer every man.”  This means that our words should be engaging, but with more than mere dazzle.  If food is not seasoned with salt, it is boring and we are not getting a necessary nutrient.

Let’s leave the whole low-sodium stuff aside.  Although, that is an interesting metaphor for what happened in liturgy, doctrine and practice in the Church…

In the Church we bless salt and use it for various things.  It is a sacramental.  You can cook with it, of course.  You can also sprinkle it in places as a protection from the attacks of the Enemy.  The Enemy does not like blessed salt!

As in all sacramentals blessing salt is serious business.  Salt is especially serious, however.

You might know that exorcised and blessed salt was used in the rite for blessing water.  The exorcism and blessing for salt is a fearsome thing.

Salt is of those few things actually personally addressed as a creature of God and then exorcised.

Exorcizo te, creatura salis, per Deum + vivum, per Deum + verum, per Deum + sanctum, per Deum, qui te per Eliseum Prophetam in aquam mitti jussit, ut sanaretur sterilitas aquae; ut efficiaris sal exorcizatum in salutem credentium; et sis omnibus sumentibus te sanitas animae et corporis; et effugiat, atque discedat a loco, in quo aspersum fueris, omnis phantasia et nequitia vel versutia diabolicae fraudis, omnisque spiritus immundus, adjuratus per eum qui venturus est judicare vivos et mortuos, et saeculum per ignem.  R. Amen.

O you creature of salt, I purge you of all evil by the living + God, by the true + God, by the holy + God, who commanded by the Prophet Elisha that you be put into water in order that the sterility of the water would be healed: so that you might be rendered a purified salt for the salvation of believers, and so that you might be a healthiness of soul and body to all who consume you, and so that you may put to flight and drive out from a place in which you will have been scattered every phantom and wickedness, and cunning trap of diabolical deceit, and every unclean spirit be solemnly banished by command through Him Who shall come to judge the living and the dead, and the world by fire.  R. Amen.

Holy Church does not kid around in these exorcisms and blessings …. in the older, traditional Rituale Romanum at least.  I will not speak of the newer “Book of Blessings” which is nearly useless and should be entirely scrapped.

Finally… I think it is a profoundly dangerous thing to give the appearance of peddling sacred things.  I would be afraid for that person’s spiritual well-being and ultimate fate.

I think the Enemy would be pleased by this mockery of blessing salt and selling it.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
49 Comments

WDTPRS: Friday 1st Week of Lent – Post communionem (2002MR)

We continue our project of looking at the Post communions of Lent:

Friday – 1st Week of Lent

This prayer was more or less the Postcommunio on the 1st Sunday in Lent in the 1962MR.  Changes were made.  It is an ancient prayer, however, to be found in various manuscripts of the Gelasian and Gregorian sacramentaries.  The ancient form, however, has libatio for refectio, as does the 1962MR.

POST COMMUNIONEM
Tui nos, Domine, sacramenti refectio sancta restauret,
et, a vetustate purgatos,
in mysterii salutaris faciat transire consortium.

We have seen refectio before, from reficio.  The more ancient prayer had libatio, which is "a drink-offering, libation".  This is found in the Vulgate in the Old Testament in Num 28:24.  Think of Genesis 35 when Jacob poured a drink offering on the pillar he set up.  A libation offering was common to all ancient cultures. 

In Isaiah 53 the "Suffering Servant" pours out his life as a sacrifice.

I think the cutter/snipper experts of the Consilium decided that libatio was not merely too "pagan" in sound, but also too sacrificial.  They chose refectio, an "eating, refeshment".  They chose a "filling" rather than an "emptying".

The older libatio helps us make better sense of the purgatos which follows.

Consortium comes from the preposition cvm (“with”) and sors (“any thing used to determine chances”). Sors is “fate, destiny, chance, fortune, condition, share, part.” It thus means also a “community of goods” and by extension “fellowship, participation, society.” A consortium is a situation in which you have “cast your lot” with a group and with whom you are sharing a common outcome or fate. We hear the word consortium near the end of the Roman Canon when we are praying to have a share in the lot, the reward, of the great martyrs named therein.

The concept of vetustas, which also appeared in our Advent prayers fairly often, refers to the "state of oldness", which pertains to the "old man" afflicted by the sin of our First Parents

LITERAL VERSION:
May the holy refreshment of Your Sacrament restore us, O Lord,
and, let it bring us, having been cleansed of the old state of being,
over into the sharing of the saving mystery.
 

That consortium is hard to get into English with out a circumlocution.  It is meant to convery a sharing of company and condition with others of a similar lot.  In English we sometimes talk about "that lot" or "his lot" to describe a person and the sort of person he is.  In this case it is the company or lot of those whose lot it is to participate in the saving mystery that flows form the Passion and Resurrection of the Lord, sacramentally bestowed on us in the Eucharist. Participate in the Eucharist in the more perfect participation of reception of Communion, and you join the lot of the saved.
 
Daily Missal (Baronius Press, 2007):
May the holy reception of Thy Sacrament, O Lord,
so restore us that we may be purified from our former ways
and join the company of the redeemed.

Posted in LENT, WDTPRS |
Comments Off on WDTPRS: Friday 1st Week of Lent – Post communionem (2002MR)

QUAERITUR: in a bind about eating meat in a Friday in Lent

From a reader:

Yesterday I brought a ham sandwich for lunch.  I had forgotten however that my firm was sponsoring a lunch on that day. It would have been somewhat awkward and unseemly to bring my own lunch to that sponsored lunch.  Eating the sandwich for supper would have been inconsiderate as my wife would have been disappointed had I not enjoyed the meal she prepared.  Certainly I could have planned things better and I take responsibility for that.  I could have for example not eaten the provided lunch and eaten the sandwich at my desk later, but at my office for a variety of reasons that is not so easy to do. So now I am left with the procrustean options of eating a ham sandwich on Friday (I would rather not do that) or throwing the sandwich away as I don’t think it will keep until tomorrow (not a particularly good choice either but preferable from certain perspectives).  What do you think?  Thanks.

 

The present legislation concerning penance states that you can substitute another form of penance.

The law for the Latin Church says:

 

Canon 1253  It is for the conference of bishops to determine more precisely the observance of fast and abstinence and to substitute in whole or in part for fast and abstinence other forms of penance, especially works of charity and exercises of piety.

 

I don’t know what country you are from, your local conference may have established norms concerning abstinence on Fridays of Lent.

Generally, however, if a person who is of the age and heath that he is bound to do the established Lenten Friday penance, including abstinence from meat, for a good reason a person can substitute another penance.

That would require a measure of honesty and a careful assessment of the circumstances.  There are so few obligations placed on Latin Catholics today in this regard.

I will assume from your scenario that you are not in a financial position such that you can responsibly throw away food, which is not good in any case.

Another scenario might be: being invited to a home and being served meat and not wanting to offend or embarrass.

Still, the reason why the Church relaxed the laws on fasting and penance was because we need to make thoughtful decisions about penance and engage in it in a meaningful way.   For some people fasting or abstaining from food really isn’t very hard.  I know a couple people who have to be reminded to eat.  On the other hand, were they away from a, say, radio or other noise maker, or cut off from the internet, they would be hard pressed. 

I am guessing that where you live, you may have the option of substituting a penance.

Finally, your parish priest, the pastor, under canon law has the ability to dispense you from your obligation of abstinence on Friday.  You might give him a call.  He would probably be interested to learn that one of his parishioners wanted to do the right thing.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box |
65 Comments