I had for a while a plugin which made it possible to receive by email notifications of new posts here. I had to kill that plugin, since it was causing another problem.
FYI
I had for a while a plugin which made it possible to receive by email notifications of new posts here. I had to kill that plugin, since it was causing another problem.
FYI
May I ask a favor?
Fr. Kirby at Vultus Christi posted a prayer to St. Joseph for a particular priest.
Will you please bookmark it or print it and … say it for me once in a while?
PRAYER TO SAINT JOSEPH FOR A PARTICULAR PRIEST
Saint Joseph,
I present to you this day
Father N., priest of Jesus Christ,
and beg you to be to him
advocate and defender,
counselor and friend.
Open your heart to him
as you opened your home to the Virgin Mother
in her hour of need.
Protect his holy priesthood
as you protected the life of the Infant Christ
threatened by cruel Herod.
In darkness bring him light;
in weakness, strength,
and in fear the peace that passes understanding.
For the sake of the tender love that bound you
to the Virgin Mary and the Infant Christ,
be for him, Saint Joseph, a constant intercessor
and a shield against every danger of body, mind, and soul
so that, in spite of his weaknesses and sins,
his priesthood may bring glory to Christ
and serve to increase the beauty of holiness
in his bride the Church.
Amen.
If not for me, for another priest?
I have been griping that Latin is becoming isolated in the Extraordinary Form. It must not be. It must be used all the time, everywhere, in the Ordinary Form.
The language of the Latin Church’s worship is Latin. What does it mean for our identity if we don’t use Latin?
Fr. Allan J. McDonald, he of rat infestation fame, has decided to celebrate the Solemnity of St. Joseph with rather more solemnity, Holy Mass in the Ordinary Form, sung, decent music, etc.
He is pretty worked up about this and has an giddy post on his blog Southern Orders. Kinda fun.
He hopes not only to edify, and do precisely what the Council asked for liturgy, but also to annoy liberals.
Win – win. I am for both objectives.
Then again, liberals are always annoyed by what the Council texts really say.
One of the things Father has chosen is the sing the SECOND Eucharistic Prayer in Latin. This is entirely possible, but I can’t recommend it for a solemn occasion. That is not what the Second Prayer is intended for. This is a Solemnity, after all. Furthermore, he makes the absurd statement, innocently repeating lousy scholarship which was shoved down our throats in seminary, that the Second Eucharistic Prayer is older than the Roman Canon. Noooo. I’ve written about this too, but here is His Hermeneuticalness (just to work in another Say The Black Do The Red priest’s blog. Moreover, the Kyrie is not the only Greek allowed in the Roman Rite (hint: Good Friday).
WDTPRS sends kudos to Fr. McDonald for doing what the Council asked!
Today, the Feast of St. Joseph, is the baptismal “name day” of our Holy Father.
Please pray for, and promote prayer for, our Holy Father.
A partial indulgence is granted to the Christian faithful who, in a spirit of filial devotion, devoutly recite any duly approved prayer for the Supreme Pontiff (e.g., the Oremus pro Pontifice):
V. Let us pray for our Pontiff, Pope Benedict.
R. May the Lord preserve him, and give him life, and bless him upon earth, and deliver him not to the will of his enemies.
Our Father. Hail Mary.
Let us pray.
O God, Shepherd and Ruler of all Thy faithful people, look mercifully upon Thy servant Benedict, whom Thou hast chosen as shepherd to preside over Thy Church. Grant him, we beseech Thee, that by his word and example, he may edify those over whom he hath charge, so that together with the flock committed to him, may he attain everlasting life. Through Christ our Lord. Amen.
The nice people at Catholic Truth Society in England sent me their new People’s Edition of the Roman Missal for DAILY use. The have a Sunday Edition which I wrote about HERE.
Buy here: USA link and UK link. Remember, this volume is for use in ENGLAND, WALES, IRELAND, and SCOTLAND. The daily Mass goer could in the USA use this, mutatis mutandis.
The new daily hand missal is the blue one, on the right. The red book is the Sunday Missal. The black book is the hand missal for the Extraordinary Form by Baronius Press.
The new daily missal is a brick. It is a nice brick, but it is a brick (1233 g or 2.12 lbs).
It could hardly be anything other than a substantial book after the Novus Ordo innovation of a three-year Sunday cycle and two-year week-day cycle.
Big? Yes. However, as a commentator added, below, it has all the “order of Mass, the ordinary, all the proper prayers and prefaces — that is, everything but the daily and Sunday scripture readings — in parallel Latin and English. It is the only new OF hand missal, so far as I know, for which this can be said.”
That said, a daily Mass goer won’t mind the extra weight. Pick up your CTS…
The binding is slightly textured (the daily, red, book is smooth).
I will refer you to may last review when it comes to the internal pages, but here is a reminder.
The paper is that fine “bible” paper, very thin but strong.
There are plenty of ribbons, for your convenience.
In the front of the missal there is a catechetical piece about the Eucharist from Sacrosanctum Concilium, and from Pope Benedict XVI’s Sacramentum caritatis, and his Verbum Domini.
The Table of Liturgical Celebrations goes to 2039.
In the back there is a section of Prayers and Devotions, including Stations of the Cross by John Henry Newman.
For the daily Mass participant who wants to follow on the page all that is being said in the sanctuary, this book will do the trick.
Hearing about the good news other people have can lift everyone’s spirits.
Have some good news?
While you are ponder that…
… please refresh your supply of …
If you haven’t tried it yet, try the Monk’s Four Favorites.
And a grinder.
FAVOR ASKED BELOW.
Supporters of the Obama Adminstration in a campaign of deceptive rhetoric are trying to tar the Church as being “political” whenever the bishops teach about matters of morals or raise their voices in the public square concerning any social issue. When the bishops raise their voices on social issues in the public square they do so not only on the basis and background of our faith, but rather of reason and the natural law. Liberals, the truly political left, however, paints what the Church holds by faith and reason as “policies”, implying that the Church’s pastors are being political when they teach on any issue which is also a social issue. They are also suggesting that political pressure must be brought against the Church so that the bishops will change their “policies” or shut up.
A case in point is found in the lies told in the liberal media about the Church and healthcare and women.
A nice antidote to comes from a concrete example in (President of the USCCB) His Eminence Timothy Card. Dolan’s blog (my emphases):
Religious Freedom and Protecting Healthcare for Women and Children
[…]
[I]f you want to see creative, daring, lifegiving healthcare for women and their children, look at what the Church is doing.
And now understand why Catholics rightly bristle when politicians and commentators characterize the Church as backwards and insensitive when it comes to women’s health. Yes, the PR experts advise them that this tactic is a proven ploy to take the attention off the current urgent issue of religious freedom. The marketers advise them that, if they can reduce the issue to one of contraception, stereotyping the Church as opposed to women’s rights, they have a chance of clouding the towering issue of the First Freedom.
But the Church should not be the ones on the defensive here. We’re on the offensive when it comes to women’s health, education, and welfare, here at home, and throughout the world. We hardly need lectures on this issue from senators.
We just want to be left alone to live out the imperatives of our faith to serve, teach, heal, feed, and care for others. We cherish this, our earthly home, America, for its enshrined freedom to do so. Those really concerned about women’s health would be better off defending the Church’s freedom to continue its work.
A couple of years ago I visited a woman’s prison. The warden asked me if I wanted to visit the expectant and new mothers’ healthcare center. It then dawned on me that, of course, some women would enter prison pregnant. I was so happy to see the expectant moms, getting good health care for themselves and their unborn babies, and to see the moms with babies under two getting classes in childrearing and parenting skills, with the babies receiving tender care right next to their moms. When I told the warden how grateful I was to see such excellent care for these women and children, he replied, “Thank yourself. Catholic Charities runs it.”
Case closed . . .
WDTPRS kudos to Card. Dolan. Do me a favor: Go spike Card. Dolan’s stats at his blog (CLICK HERE) and encourage him! Tell him Fr. Z sent you!
If half of you go and leave a nice note and promise of prayers, I’ll bet he would be very encouraged. He has a combox. It’ll take … what… 30 seconds?
From the Canonical Defender comes this:
Possible canonical consequences for participation in ‘same-sex weddings’
March 19, 2012
British Catholic blogger Damien Thompson recently remarked “For Roman Catholics the prospect [of Britain legalizing same-sex marriage] is a very bleak one. Even if a liberal priest wanted to do the honours, he’d incur automatic excommunication and be out of a job. The ‘wedding’ would be a parody of the sacrament. So a legal ban would save a lot of awkwardness.” Of course, there is no such thing as ‘same-sex marriage’ and civil law should not pretend that there is. But that’s not what I respond to here. My focus is on canon law.
As canon law reads right now, officiating at a ‘same-sex wedding’ does not result in latae sententiae excommunication. Green, “Table 1”, in CLSA Comm (1985) at 932. To the extent, however, that such action on a cleric’s part might constitute, say, “abuse of ecclesiastical power or function”—and I think that such an act would constitute abuse of Church office—he might well face punishment “according to the gravity of the act” and even loss of office. Canon 1389. Whether that punishment could, in turn, in the face of, say, clerical recalcitrance or repeat offenses, lay the foundations for later excommunication (Canons 1393, 1399, and/or by particular legislation under Canon 1315) remains to be seen.
Individual Catholics attempting such marriages seem generally susceptible to a “just penalty” for simulation of a sacrament under Canon 1379.