Of SNAP, the Catholic League, Card. Dolan and fair treatment

I noticed on the blog of His Eminence Timothy Card. Dolan, who in his capacity as President of the USCCB has been called on to defend the rights of the Church in the midst of a deepening kulturkampf, a comment about SNAP, founded on work of The Catholic League.  It took me by surprise, but… not really.  SNAP is part of a larger phenomenon and Card. Dolan is right to bring it up, particularly because of his local newspaper (Hell’s Bible), SNAP’s ideologically blinkered advocate.

On the heels of reading that, I received a missive from The Catholic League:

SNAP’S DEFENDERS SHOW TRUE COLORS

March 21, 2012

Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments on those who continue to defend the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP):

Last week we released a report on SNAP that showed beyond a reasonable doubt what an utter fraud the organization is (click here to read it). It was not an essay; it was not an op-ed; it was not conjecture; it was not our opinion. It was the voice of David Clohessy, the director of SNAP. When coupled with our report last summer on the proceedings of its national convention (it offered irrefutable proof of its hate-filled agenda) it cannot be maintained by any serious observer what SNAP is all about.

The credibility of those who continue to defend this wholly discredited organization is on the line. That would include the editorial board of the New York Times and the Newark Star-Ledger (the latter offered a particularly vicious statement), as well as pundits such as Andrew Sullivan. That the near-moribund National Organization for Women and the Feminist Majority should weigh in is not surprising: though SNAP has nothing to do with women’s rights, it has everything to do with attacking the Catholic Church, and that is music to the ear of radical feminists. But it is Frank Bruni, an op-ed columnist for the New York Times, who needs to be answered more than anyone; he loves SNAP.

Bruni notes that “some Catholic leaders have contended” that what drives wide media coverage of the issue of priestly sexual abuse is “an anti-Catholic and anti-religious bias.” Wrong, he says, it’s because of the “magnitude of the violation of trust.” No, sir, it isn’t. If it were, then the Times would be covering the incredible explosion of child sexual abuse by rabbis (in Brooklyn alone, 85 arrests have taken place in the last two years, yet the Times has never reported on any of this). Moreover, the media treat with a yawn the alarming rate of child sexual abuse in the public schools. So what else, if not anti-Catholicism, would be driving the disproportionate coverage? I’m still waiting for the evidence that I am wrong.

Contact our director of communications about Donohue’s remarks:
Jeff Field
Phone: 212-371-3191
E-mail: cl@catholicleague.org

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Brick by Brick, Clerical Sexual Abuse, Dogs and Fleas, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty | Tagged , , , , , , , ,
5 Comments

The Feeder Feed: Death and Swallow on the Roof Edition. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

The Feeder Feed: Death and Swallow on the Roof Edition. Wherein Fr. Z rants.I saw a swallow today, but they move pretty fast and wasn’t able to get a photo.  I’ll try again later.

The sighting of a swallow at the turn of the time from winter to spring is particularly auspicious.

(Get the pun?  Get it?  Huh?).

In celebration of my swallow sighting, I turned to my handy copy of the 2005 Roman Martyrology where today we find the rather laconic entry:

5.  In Monte Casino, natalis sancti Benedicti, abbatis, cuius memoria agitur die undecima iulii.

Today marks the “birthday” into heaven of St. Benedict of Nursia (modern Norcia), whose influence in Western Civilization was monumental.

In the traditional calendar in the calendars of monastic communities we celebrate St. Benedict today.  In the post-Vatican II calendar, the feast was moved to 11 July. Why?  No idea.  I am ever impressed by the chutzpa of the reformers of things after Vatican II.  Infected with tinkeritis, they imposed on the Church massive innovations to the calendar,     eliminating octaves, moving feasts which marked the passing of seasons, the times to plant and harvest, celebrate the heavenly patrons of cities and individuals.

Now they old Italian proverb about the coming of spring hardly makes sense to those who don’t know the old calendar: “San Benedetto, rondine sul tetto…. St. Benedict, a swallow is on the roof”, harking to the fact that this is when swallows are migrating back to Italy.  Thus, I come full circle.

In any event, today is the Transitus Sancti Benedicti.   I think for the sake of the entry we can leave aside some question of whether a man named “Benedictus” was really our guy or not, for he is rather thinly attested in ancient sources and the Rule isn’t as original as some would have it, we will nevertheless today stipulate that he did live and have a rule and go with it!  And if he lived, he died.

We have something about his death from the Dialogues of St Gregory the Great (Book II, 37):

In the year that was to be his last, the man of God foretold the day of his holy death to a number of his disciples. In mentioning it to some who were with him in the monastery, he bound them to strict secrecy. Some others, however, who were stationed elsewhere he only informed of the special sign they would receive at the time of his death.

Six days before he died, he gave orders for his tomb to be opened. Almost immediately he was seized with a violent fever that rapidly wasted his remaining energy. Each day his condition grew worse until finally, on the sixth day, he had his disciples carry him into the chapel where he received the Body and Blood of our Lord to gain strength for his approaching end. Then, supporting his weakend body on the arms of his brethren, he stood with his hands raised to heaven and, as he prayed, breathed his last.

That day two monks, one of them at the monastery, the other some distance away, received the very same revelation. They both saw a magnificent road covered with rich carpeting and glittering with thousands of lights. From his monastery it stretched eastward in a straight line until it reached up into heaven. And there in the brightness stood a man of majestic appearance, who asked them, “Do you know who passed this way?”

“No,” they replied.

“This,” he told them, “is the road taken by blessed Benedict, the Lord’s beloved, when he went to heaven.”

Thus, while the brethren who were with Benedict witnessed his death, those who were absent knew about it through the sign he had promised them. His body was laid to rest in the Chapel of St. John the Baptist, which he had built to replace the altar of Apollo.”

Hagiography, to be sure.  But it is a good Memento mori for us all.

In any event, if you want to listen to Lauds, sung in Gregorian chant by the Benedictines in Benedict’s birthplace, Norcia, check out their website HERE.  Lauds is HERE.

In any event, today is the feast of the “dies natalis“, birthday into heaven, of St. Benedict.

I wish all Benedictines and all those named Benedict in any way a holy and happy feast wihth many blessings.

 

 

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Saints: Stories & Symbols, The Feeder Feed, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , , , ,
12 Comments

“Dear Taliban….”

Yes, it’s the first full day of Spring.  Birds are chirping, flowers are rising, grass is greening, trees are budding, candidates are bloviating, liberals are obfustcating, and presidents are undermining.

"Dear Taliban...."

Posted in Religious Liberty, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , ,
13 Comments

CH: Muslims and Sikhs in Britain side with Catholic Church on same-sex “marriage”

CH: Muslims and Sikhs in Britain side with Catholic Church on same-sex "marriage"From the UK’s best Catholic weekly, The Catholic Herald comes this, also of interest to readers in the USA because of the accelerating same-sex cultural re-engineering agenda.

Muslims and Sikhs back Church on same-sex marriage

By Staff Reporter on Tuesday, 20 March 2012

The leader of the Muslim Council for Britain has said that he agrees with the Catholic Church’s response to the introduction of same-sex marriage.

Farooq Murad, Secretary General of the MCB, said: “Whilst we remain opposed to all forms of discrimination, including homophobia, redefining the meaning of marriage is in our opinion unnecessary and unhelpful.

“With the advent of civil partnerships, both homosexual and heterosexual couples now have equal rights in the eyes of the law.

“Therefore, in our view the case to change the definition of marriage, as accepted throughout time and across cultures, is strikingly weak. In common with other Abrahamic faiths, marriage in Islam is defined as “a union between a man and a woman”, he said. “So while the state has accommodated for gay couples, such unions will not be blessed as marriage by the Islamic institutions.”

Murad’s comments follow criticism of the Government’s proposals from Cardinal Keith O’Brien and Archbishop Vincent Nichols of Westminster.

The leader of Britain’s Sikh’s community, Lord Singh, head of the Network of Sikh Organisations, also said that the Government’s proposals were “a sideways assault on religion.”

“It is an attempt by a vocal, secular minority to attack religion,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.”

He continued: “We have total respect for gays and lesbians and we are delighted that there is a Civil Partnership Act. We believe that this gives gays and lesbians everything they need.”

The Government are now in the process of consulting on how a change to the definition of marriage would be brought about.

Posted in One Man & One Woman | Tagged , , , , ,
25 Comments

Msgr. Bux to SSPX: “Come take part in this blessed future in which we can already foresee dawn, despite the persistent darkness. “

Monsignor Nicola Bux, a consultor to the CDF and to the Office of Pontifical Ceremonies, etc., (originator of what I call the Bux Protocol – which every priest and bishop should remember that people may invoke!) has written a letter to the Superior of the SSPX, Bp. Bernard Fellay and to the priests of the SSPX (a “priestly society”, after all). The letter is in Italian at Scuola Ecclesia Mater and in the French original. Our friends at Rorate have an English translation and I don’t feel like do it over again (though I am tempted). Visit them, but here it is, just to make it more visible.

My emphases and comments.

To His Excellency, Bishop Bernard Fellay, and to the Priests of the Society of Saint Pius X

Your Excellency,
Most dear Brothers,

Christian brotherhood is stronger than flesh and blood because it offers us, thanks to the divine Eucharist, a foretaste of heaven.

Christ invited us to experience communion, this is what our “I” is made of. Communion means loving one’s neighbor a priori, because we have the one Savior in common with him. Based on this fact, communion is ready for every sacrifice in the name of unity; and this unity must be visible, as the last petition addressed by Our Lord to his Father teaches us – “ut unum sint, ut credat mundus” [“that they be one (thing) – “that the world might believe”] -, because this is the decisive testimony of Christ’s friends.

It is undeniable that numerous facts of Vatican II and of the period that followed it, related to the human dimension of this event, have represented true calamities and have caused intense pain to many great Churchmen. But God does not allow His Holy Church to reach self-destruction.

We cannot consider the severity of the human factor without having confidence in the divine factor, that is to say, in Providence, who guides history and, in particular, the history of the Church, while respecting human freedom.

The Church is at once a divine institution, divinely protected, and a product of men. Her divine aspect does not deny her human one – personality and freedom – and does not necessarily hinder it; her human aspect, while remaining whole and even compromising, never denies her divine one.

For reasons of Faith, but also due to the confirmations, albeit slow ones, that we are able observe at the historical level, we believe that God has prepared and continues to prepare, throughout these years, men who are worthy of rectifying the errors and the ommissions we all deplore. [Do I hear an “Amen!”?] Holy works already exist, and will appear in still greater numbers, that are isolated ones from the others but that a divine strategy links at a distance and whose actions add up to a well-ordered design, as it miraculously happened at the time of the painful Lutheran rebellion. [Interesting parallel.]

These divine interventions seem to grow in proportion to the complexity of the facts. The future will make it clear, as we are convinced, and it seems dawn is almost at hand.

During some moments, the uncertain dawn struggles with darkness, which fades slowly, but when it appears we know that the sun is there, and that it will invariably pursue its course in the heavens.

With Saint Catherine of Siena, we wish to say: “Come to Rome in complete safety,” next to the house of the common Father who was given to us as the visible and perpetual principle and foundation of Catholic unity.

Come take part in this blessed future in which we can already foresee dawn, despite the persistant darkness. Your refusal would increase darkness, not light. And yet the sparks of light we can already admire are numerous, beginning with those of the great liturgical restoration effected by the motu proprio “Summorum Pontificum”. It stirs up, throughout the whole world, a large movement of adherence from all those who wish to increase the worship of God, particularly the young. [Do I hear an “Amen!”, brothers and sisters?]

How to ignore the other concrete gestures, full of meaning, of the Holy Father, such as the lifting of the excommunications of the bishops ordained by Abp. Lefebvre, the opening of a public debate on the interpretation of Vatican II in light of Tradition, and, for this purpose, the renewal of the Ecclesia Dei Commission? [What is it doing, by they way?]

Perplexities certainly remain, points to be deepened or detailed, as those regarding ecumenism and interreligious dialogue (which has been, for that matter, already the object of an important clarification given by the declaration Dominus Iesus, of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, of August 6, 2000), or regarding the way in which religious liberty is to be understood.

Also on these matters, your canonically assured presence within the Church will help bring more light.  [“canonically assured presence” – keep in mind that Msgr. Bux is a real insider. He isn’t talking out of his biretta.]

How not to think of the contribution you could give to the welfare of the whole Church, thanks to your pastoral and doctrinal resources, your capabilities and your sensibility?

This is the appropriate moment, the favorable time to come. Timete Dominum transeuntem: let not the occasion of grace the Lord offers you pass by, let it not pass by your side without recognizing it.

Will the Lord grant another one? Will not we all one day appear before His Court and answer not only for the evil we have done, but above all for the good we might have accomplished but did not?

The Holy Father’s heart trembles: he awaits you anxiously because he loves you, because the Church needs you for a common profession of faith before a world that is each day more secularized and that seems to turn its back to its Creator and Savior hopelessly.

In the full ecclesial communion with the great family that is the Catholic Church, your voice will no longer be stifled, your contribution will be neither ignorable nor ignored, but will be able to bring forth, with that of so many others, abundant fruits which would otherwise go to waste.

The Immaculate teaches us that too many graces are lost because they are not asked for; we are convinced that, by answering the offer of the Holy Father favorably, the Society of Saint Pius X will become an instrument to enkindle new rays from the fingers of our Heavenly Mother.

On this day dedicated to him, may Saint Joseph, spouse of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Patron of the Universal Church, inspire and sustain your resolutions: “Come to Rome in all safety”.

Rome, March 19, 2012.
Feast of Saint Joseph

d. Nicola Bux

Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.

WDTPRS kudos to Msgr. Bux.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Ecclesiae unitatem, Four Last Things, Fr. Z KUDOS, Mail from priests, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Pope of Christian Unity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices, Universae Ecclesiae | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,
49 Comments

QUAERITUR: Tenebrae hearse

Please use the sharing buttons!  Thanks!

QUAERITUR: Tenebrae hearseFrom a reader:

Praised by Jesus Christ! Thank you for your blog. Our small parish needs to find a tennabrae hearse. I am searching on ebay and various church supply websites, but I need your expert advice. Any help will be greatly appreciated! God bless.

The candles on the hearse are snuffed out one by one as the psalms of the nocturnes and lauds of Tenebrae are completed.

So… anyone?

Also, does anyone have a blueprint to make one?  A carpenter could probably get one ready for use before Holy Thursday.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,
13 Comments

“If I were the Devil…”

Liberals demand that you deny common sense and they reduce the supernatural to the natural.

Paul Harvey on 13 October 1964

[wp_youtube]VatjpiaYqPM[/wp_youtube]

The third session of Vatican II was going on when this was on air.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Classic Posts, Clerical Sexual Abuse, Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Four Last Things, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,
21 Comments

Beating the devil! The “Madonna del Soccorso”

Beating the devil! The "Madonna del Soccorso"People seem finally to be noticing the image of Mary (as of this writing – it’ll probably change one day) on the sidebar.  All of sudden I am getting email about it.

The image is that of a “Madonna del Soccorso… Our Lady of Help”.  There are a few more here.

I am not sure where I got this image, truth to tell, but the original source may be a priest who wrote the other day. He told me that he is pretty sure it is his photo. This Madonna del Soccorso was painted in 1494 by Francesco Melanzio (1465-1530).  It is now found in the cloister of the Abbey of San Felice in Giano del Umbria, the foundation house of the Missionaries of the Precious Blood.

I love the spirit of this devotional image.  Another spiffy one here.

Today I received from a reader a link to a page that talks about this particular form of Marian devotional images. There is an abstract from a doctoral dissertation:

Beating the devil: Images of the Madonna del Soccorso in Italian Renaissance art
by El-Hanany, Efrat, PhD, INDIANA UNIVERSITY, 2006

Abstract: An unusually empowered devotional image of the Virgin Mary, the so-called Madonna del Soccorso, appeared for a brief period in the history of central Italian Renaissance art (1480s-1520s). Here the otherwise graceful Queen of Heaven is presented wielding a club against a devil who threatens to abduct a helpless child. This study investigates the Augustinian order’s promotion of this strikingly spectacular image in banners, frescos and altarpieces throughout the regions of Umbria, the Marches and Tuscany, arguing that it served to define and promote specific Augustinian ideologies such as the power of speech and the necessity of early Baptism. But as part of the larger tradition of child miracle imagery, the Madonna del Soccorso was also intended to give comfort in societal disasters of the period, especially in instances of the inexplicable death of children, parental negligence and infanticide. In the various late-medieval textual sources of the Soccorso miracle, notably the Speculum Historiale of Vincent de Beauvais and the Miracles of the Virgin Mary of Gautier de Coincy, a malediction placed on the child by his own mother (che il diavoli ti porti via—‘may the devil take you’) can be seen to suggest the involuntary or deliberate act on the part of the mother that brought about the death of her child. The independent agency granted to the Virgin in this imagery is seen to have unbalanced accepted doctrinal understandings of the limited power of Mary and indeed that of women during the time in question, particularly with reference to a possible overturning of the recognized sexual hierarchy. This undoubtedly contributed to the subsequent banning of the Madonna del Soccorso typology by the Council of Trent. [!] This study therefore presents a comprehensive examination of this unique and intriguing typology by bringing together issues of gender, power, social and religious history and popular superstition and devotion that have not previously been considered holistically within this context. I am hoping that this research may contribute to a revisionist feminist reading of Madonna iconography within the contemporary scholarship of Renaissance imagery.

A “revisionist feminist reading”, will surely be utter nonsense and gobbledygook.   More about this imagery here.

In the abstract, the influence of Council of Trent is over-stated.  In the last session of 1563 there were decrees issued (a Council that issued decrees! Imagine that!), about devotional images.

In any event, I am glad to know more about this provocative image, now more meaningful.

UPDATE:

A link to another article and version.

Beating the devil! The "Madonna del Soccorso"

 

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
25 Comments

iTunes feed…. is it possible?

Is it possible?

My iTunes updated with my podcast feed!

Dare I suggest… dare I…. dare I suggest that you check it out?

Let me know what happens.

Meanwhile, please VOTE for WDTPRS today. Thanks!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes | Tagged ,
7 Comments

Anti-Catholic NPR show host mocks Benedict XVI at tax-payers expense

I saw this on NewsBusters:

NPR Game Show Host Unloads the Pope Jokes, Starting with He’s a ‘Gay Icon’
By Tim Graham

NPR’s weekend game show “Wait! Wait! Don’t Tell Me!” usually saves most of its topical humor for supposed White House drunk George W. Bush or Dick Cheney the Grim Reaper for all the usual smug-liberal laugh lines. On Saturday, host Peter Sagal went on an extended comedy routine with five jokes mocking Pope Benedict XVI, beginning with the notion that he’s “another famous gay icon.”

By contrast, a review of the last four shows finds there have been zero Barack Obama jokes. However, on March 10, they made fun of Rick Santorum saying if elected, he would not recite the names of former presidents to make excuses for himself. This prompted a “caliphate” joke at the Catholic candidate’s expense.

Read the rest there. Be prepared to get angry.

NPR receives federal funding.

There is contact information for NPR. I suggest you USE IT.

UPDATE:

As far as I can tell, the origin of this cologne for the Pope story is the Italian daily Il Messaggero.

I think people made an assumption that the Pope himself commission a cologne.  The story doesn’t say that:

Una confezione con le due acque venne donata al pontefice dai prelati spagnoli. Passò un po’ di tempo e a Reggio Emilia giunsero richieste analoghe. Una dal santuario di Sant’Antonio di Padova e l’altra, assai più importante, dal Vaticano per una acqua da destinare a Benedetto XVI. A lui e solo a lui. Silvana Casoli si sentì quasi svenire, il compito era immane.

The story says that it was for him, but it doesn’t say he commissioned it himself.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Religious Liberty, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , ,
71 Comments