ASK FATHER: “active participation” in the Traditional Latin Mass

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I have a question about “active participation”.

The priest that used to service my SSPX chapel was very adamant about is using a missal to follow and pray the Mass. He added that it wouldn’t be necessary if you were fluent in Latin.

When I mentioned this in a Trad Facebook group, a couple people mentioned the old school “say the Rosary” during Mass and expressed respectful disagreement with Father.

We all know the line about “active participation” concerning the vernacular of the Novus Ordo. But this is the first time I heard it applied as such to the Vetus Ordo.

In your opinion, is Father correct in his insistence on using the missal to pray the VO?

The concept of “full, conscious and actual/active” participation expressed in Sacrosanctum Concilium did not leap full-grown like Athena from the heads of the Council Fathers.   The call for deeper participation grew up all through the time of the 20th century’s “Liturgical Movement” and before.   Long before the Council and Popes John XXIII and Paul VI, Pius X and Pius XI were urging people to more outward participation as an aid to their interior engagement.   Pius XII also had his crack at it, although late in his pontificate in a document on music we were instructed that the highest form of active participation at Mass is the reception of Communion in the state of grace.  Reception… sounds passive, right?  It isn’t! When the mind is engaged and the heart is straining forward toward the moment you are actively receptive.  There’s nothing passive about it!

The use of a “hand missal” is really helpful, particularly for those who have a hard time remembering something for more than a quarter hour.   This is why I constantly suggest that people start looking at the readings and other texts of Mass with a good hand missal or other source on THURSDAY, refreshing every day till Sunday.   On Sunday, you will be able to hear what you learned over the last few days even as the Latin is being sung.  Sure, the reading is being said or sung in Latin.  So?  You’ve familiarized yourself with it for days before hand.   Sure, take the missal along.   Then, review what you heard on Sunday each day through Wednesday and start over.   Vernacular is being read?  Okay… repetita iuvant.   Fluent in Latin or not… prepare.

One thing we have to remember about the readings at Mass, which is especially evident in the Vetus.   The readings are also sacrifices being raised on high to the Father.  The Word is being raised upward.  This is why the priest has to read them and why they are read at the altar even if they are sung by subdeacon and deacon or read in the vernacular.  This is also why they should be read in a sacral language, for us in the Latin Church – Latin.  This sacrificial sense is stripped from the Novus Ordo, which, along with the multiplication of readings, gives the whole first part of Mass, the “liturgy of the Word” a didactic feeling.   While there is certainly room for and an element of didacticism in liturgy it is not by any stretch of the imagination the primary element.

(I’ll wager that quite a few priests trained in more recent times who say the Vetus Ordo don’ realize that the readings are also sacrifice.)

It is right that we should be urged to engage with our minds and hearts, focused and commanded by our wills, in the words and gestures of Holy Mass, either in the Novus Ordo or in the Vetus Ordo.   Frankly, the Vetus Ordo is in many ways even richer than the Novus, even though there isn’t the legendary variety of Scripture in the Vetus as the Novus.   If you can do this without the aid of a book or sheet, great!   If the book helps, great!   If you want to pray the Rosary, great!  Maybe a little less great, but… prayer is prayer.   It’s just that the Mass is for us Catholics the “fons et culmen… source and summit” of our Catholic identity.

Every word and gesture of the sacred liturgy, especially Holy Mass, is CHRIST acting and speaking.   As Head, He speaks in the person of the priest.  As Body He speaks through the congregation.  When they speak and act together, such as the moment of Communion, Head and Body are manifestly one, Christus Totus, in that sublime, mysterious moment.

The rites are our rites.  We are our rites.  They shape us.  We have our identity also from them.

As a baptized person you have a real share in Christ’s priesthood.  That share isn’t like that of the ordained priest, but it is real.  It enables you to offer pleasing sacrifice to God.

Knowing that you share in the priesthood of Christ, knowing that every word is Christ, knowing what you are going to be presented on Sunday, prepare well so that you can with your whole mind and heart under the guidance of your will actively receive everything that Christ wants to give you through the sacred rites of His Church.

I will never say that it is a bad thing to say the Rosary during Mass.  As a matter of fact, sometimes that is just the right thing to do.  However, most of the time we are offered the opportunity for a fuller engagement, not just with the Lord at Communion (or maybe not if you are not in the state of grace), but in the whole beautiful formulary of Mass for the day, part of a seasonal cycle or a saint’s day.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World | Tagged ,
15 Comments

ASK FATHER: How much prayer is enough?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I have seen several Examination of Conscience guides mention neglecting prayer as a sin. Could you unpack this a bit? Failing to pray at all for a week, for example, seems like it would be a mortal sin, but what about saying only 3 Hail Marys before bed on a particular day? Is this such light prayer that it also constitutes sinful neglect?

St Teresa of Avila says: “no prayer, no salvation. No mental prayer, no holiness.”

Turning to Scripture, I am reminded of 1 Thessalonians 5:16-18:

16 Rejoice always, 17 pray constantly, 18 give thanks in all circumstances; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you.

“Pray always”.  How’s that?

It isn’t a suggestion, by the way.  Paul was serious.

Okay, we are not going to be doing that explicitly.   Not even those who are like Carthusians are going to get that that point unless …

…unless in their relationship with God their will – their intention – is oriented to God such that all that they do has a prayerful component.  Their desire is to pray.  They want that all that they do be also offered to God.  Therefore, in all that they do their actions are intentionally prayerful.   That takes a lot of practice, I think and a lot of grace.   It’s a matter of relationship with God.

It is important that we don’t reduce our relationship with God to a contractual relationship.

For example, the ancient pagan Romans thought they had a contractual relationship with the gods expressed in the phrase “Do ut des… I give (something to you) in order that you give (something to me)”.  Hence, if the Romans offered their sacrifices according to the proper form, the contract was maintained, peace with the gods – the pax deorum – was maintained.  The ancient pagans thought Christians were interrupting that contractual arrangement, which made them a danger to the pax deorum, which made the enemies of the “state”.

As an aside, the ancient pagan sacrifices had to be precise for the contract to be maintained.  So, if anyone screwed up anything, they had to start over.   No state business could be done without the necessary sacrifices blah blah by the consul whose turn it was, etc.  There was one period of internal political warfare between factions when one side manage to ram into the consulship a guy with a stutter.   Get my point?   I digress.

Let’s not reduce our relationship with God to a contract.  “I’ll pray this amount.”

We want to have a good, strong healthy deepening relationship with God.

Asking, “how much is enough” is sort like asking “How often should I talk to my wife so she won’t leave me?”  That’s not a healthy marriage.

An examen list will address the issue of lack of prayer.  However, sins are not so much breaking of rules as they are breaking of the Sacred Heart, a violation of a relationship.

That said, rules can be helpful if the relationship isn’t yet strong.

If one’s heart has all sorts of disordered attachments, “pray always” becomes difficult if not impossible. In that case rules guide us.

For example, clergy and religious have a rule to pray the Office.

Our Lady insists on the daily prayer of the Rosary (15 or 20 minutes). Perhaps, for a layman, that would be enough to maintain the relationship.

No matter what, when we do what we do with great love, Our Lord will be better pleased than if what we do is just for following the rules.   For example, almsgiving is more pleasing to Our Lord when given with love.   Full, conscious, actual participation at Holy Mass is more pleasing that simple fulfillment of a precept.

Perhaps we can see prayer and all the other good things we can do as being like the talents in the parable.  God has made a great investment in each one of us.  How can we repay and also overpay in loving gratitude for His investment in us?   Formal prayer can be like that.  Formal prayer is a kind of tithing of one’s time determined by one’s state in life.

Formal and loving with enduring intention are not mutually exclusive, of course.  And the one -the formal – can, over time, lead to the other.

We should all have a solid regimen of good devotions and prayers.  Classic devotions and prayers were crafted in prayer and then polished over time into beautiful jewels.

The beautiful thing about such a regimen is that it deepens with time.  Maybe it begins more in the category of a “rule”, but it nevertheless affects and effects a relationship. Time and experience (regularity and quality) make it ever more meritorious.

After that longish ramble, I’ll try to be concrete, provided we don’t make the mistake of reducing our relationship with God to a contract.

What might be “enough”?   It seems to me that:

  • a morning offering
  • prayers before and after meals
  • the Angelus/Regina caeli
  • the Rosary (15-20 minutes of your day?)
  • an evening offering with your examination of conscience

Our Lady insists on the Rosary… doesn’t she.  That, at least, should be your practice, if nothing else.

Of course we can add all sorts of other wonderful things, such as visits to the Blessed Sacrament.  However, for a layman that might be enough to establish a good daily prayer relationship with God provided that we are also on the road to more rather than just remaining in the status quo ante.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ACTION ITEM!, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
5 Comments

Feast of Christ the King and the Act of Consecration of the Human Race to the Sacred Heart of Jesus

Sunday, in the Church’s Vetus Ordo calendar, is the Feast of Christ the King, there fixed on the last Sunday of October.

It is customary on the Feast of Christ the King publicly to recite the Act of Consecration of the Human Race to the Sacred Heart of Jesus.  This can bring a plenary indulgence.

GET ON YOUR KNEES RIGHT NOW AND RECITE THIS PRAYER ALOUD.  JUST DO IT.

 

Act of Consecration of the Human Race to the Sacred Heart of Jesus

Most Sweet Jesus, Redeemer of the human race, look down upon us humbly prostrate before Thine altar. We are Thine, and Thine we wish to be; but to be more surely united to Thee, behold each one of us freely consecrates ourselves today to Thy Most Sacred Heart.
Many indeed have never known Thee; Many too, despising Thy precepts, have rejected Thee. Have mercy on them all, most merciful Jesus, and draw them to Thy Sacred Heart. Be Thou King, O Lord, not only of the faithful children, who have never forsaken Thee, but also of the prodigal children, who have abandoned Thee; Grant that they may quickly return to their Father’s house lest they die of wretchedness and hunger.
Be Thou King of those who are deceived by erroneous opinions, or whom discord keeps aloof, and call them back to the harbor of truth and unity of faith, so that there may be but one flock and one Shepherd.
Be Thou King of all those who are still involved in the darkness of idolatry or of Islamism, and refuse not to draw them into the light and kingdom of God. Turn Thine eyes of mercy towards the children of the race, once Thy chosen people: of old they called down upon themselves the Blood of the Savior; may it now descend upon them a laver of redemption and of life.
Grant, O Lord, to Thy Church assurance of freedom and immunity from harm; give peace and order to all nations, and make the earth resound from pole to pole with one cry; praise to the Divine Heart that wrought our salvation; To it be glory and honor forever.

UPDATE

From the Vatican’s Apostolic Penitentiary, the concession of the plenary indulgence, in Latin, with the prayer, in Latin:

Plenaria indulgentiaconceditur christifideli qui, in sollemnitate D.N. Iesu Christi Universorum Regis, actum dedicationis humani generis eidem Iesu Christo Regi (Iesu dulcissime, Redemptor) publice recitaverit; in aliis rerum adiunctis indulgentia erit partialis.5

Iesu dulcissime, Redemptor humani generis, respice nos ante conspectum tuum humillime provolutos. Tui sumus, tui esse volumus; quo autem tibi coniuncti firmius esse possimus, en hodie sacratissimo Cordi tuo se quisque nostrum sponte dedicat. Te quidem multi novere nunquam; te, spretis mandatis tuis, multi repudiarunt. Miserere utrorumque, benignissime Iesu, atque ad sanctuum Cor tuum rape universos. Rex esto, Domine, nec fidelium tantum qui nullo tempore discessere a te, sed etiam prodigorum filiorum qui te reliquerunt: fac ut domum paternam cito repetant, ne miseria et fame pereant. Rex esto eorum, quos aut opinionum error deceptos habet, aut discordia separatos, eosque ad portum veritatis atque ad unitatem fidei revoca, ut brevi fiat unum ovile et unus pastor. Largire, Domine, Ecclesiae tuae securam cum incolumitate libertatem; largire cunctis gentibus tranquillitatem ordinis; perfice, ut ab utroque terrae vertice una resonet vox: Sit laus divino Cordi, per quod nobis parta salus: ipsi gloria et honor in saecula. Amen.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
6 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes – Christ the King (N.O.: 30th) 2023

Share the good stuff.

It’s the Feast of Christ the King in the Vetus Ordo and the 30th Sunday of the Novus Ordo.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Sunday Mass of obligation?

Tell about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass. I hear that it is growing. Of COURSE.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

I have some thoughts about the Sunday Epistle reading posted at One Peter Five.

Sometimes we speak loosely about the “head of the Church.” Most of the time that’s tolerable, since we are speaking somewhat casually.  Very often people say that “the Pope is the head of the Church.” No. Christ is the head of the Church. The Pope, Successor of Peter, is Christ’s Vicar on earth. Vicar is from the Latin vicarius, “a substitute, deputy, proxy, a locum tenens.” The Successor of Peter is the visible, substitute “head” of the earthly Church. He is the visible figure of unity, one of the Church’s marks or attributes along with holiness, catholicity and apostolicity. The Petrine (having to do with Peter) ministry of the figure whom we call the “Pope” (papacy is an institution that over time developed around the office of the Bishop of Rome, Peter’s Successor) is a constitutive element of the Church that solidifies Christ’s gifts to the Church of indefectibility and infallibility.

Ultimately, however, the Pope is not the “head of the Church.” The head of the Church is Christ.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
6 Comments

ROME 23/10 – Day 29: This is day 302 of this year of grace

Okay… let’s do this.   “Daylight savings” is over.

06:36

17:11

17:30 is the Ave Maria

This is day 302 of this year of grace.  There were/are 64 to go as I write and this day ends soon.

Welcome registrants:

SierraFaith
gerardandrewjohn

In the Vetus calendar, it being the last Sunday in October, it is the Feast of Christ the King.

Again, I had this pesky video problem.  I have some lovely audio.  Will you be patient and let me get to it later?

Today…

That archpriest shouldn’t be looking around!

It was a feast for the eyes and ears.  There was a visiting choir from England.  Ahhhhhh…..

I wanted to give you a sense of the textures.  Imagine this with strong choral music and incense heavy with frankincense wafting.

Why not just a humble clay thing and some strips of whatever.  Sure, when nothing else is possible, with joy!

This… this… speaks to decorum and decorum speaks to what is aptum et pulcrum which speak to bonum et verum which point to DEUM UNUM TRINUM.

There was a moment in the Mass when the choir was singing and the sacred ministers were doing their ballet and I was reading Lauds and I went into a kind of tunnel, like StarGate with less whoosy woozy.  It was a perfect moment of clarity in the Roman Rite, in Rome, in this church and at this moment with all these people from every where in the world so focused and happy.

Here’s a nice shot of some members of the Archconfraternity that was founded by St. Philip Neri.  I especially want to post this for a friend whose induction in the confrat is pending his return to Rome.

This week they are conducting another food drive for the poor of the area.  People will bring food stuffs and give donation.  If only they had a world-wide donate button on a dedicated site… hmmm.

Folks.  I need income so I keep posting this.  I like getting income when you also can benefit. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit.

Black to move.  Mate in 3.  Yes, BLACK to move.

Isn’t chess great?

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Right now Igor has big discounts because it was his birthday on 28 Oct (copy cat).  Check him out.  Discounts and I get a cut.

I mentioned before that there could be a project for a white solemn set which would also include a gremial for Pontifical Mass at the Faldstool, cope, an altar frontal, and tabernacle canopy. There is also hanging in the air a fund drive BLACK VESTMENTS (how nice it would be to have them this week… and all the priests LOVE the red sets!)   From the parish the priest in charge of vestments wrote:

The idea is to make something in the style of our existing green solemn, namely damask and inserts from a stunning velvet fabric and short bushy fringe edging. In this case, the base damask would be white(ish) and the velvet would be kinda goldy with some red and blue in the pattern.

I’ll float this survey by you again.  Don’t send money yet.  However, drop me a note. You might say what you could give. Add any other comment you want, hopefully encouraging and relatable.

    Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
    2 Comments

    Card. Müller makes some terrific points about what a Synod (“walking togther”) is and must never be

    At First Things there is a really helpful piece by Gerhard Card. Müller, former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and a present participant in “Walking Together about Walking Togetherity”.

    Card. Müller gives some background to the history and theological placement of what a “synod” is and he identifies modern dangers if misapplied.

    Toward the top, I found these paragraphs of great interest.

    […]

    Many observers think that Pope Francis wants to correct what might be called the hierarchical, or “primacy” element, of church leadership by appealing to the synodal element of leadership allegedly preserved in the East. Since Vatican I, so-called “Rome-critical” theologians have described the Church’s emphasis on primacy as excessive. It would be good, here, to be guided by Pope Francis’s predecessor Leo the Great. His pontificate shows that, theologically and pastorally, the principles of primacy and synodality do not oppose each other, but rather mutually condition and support each other.

    Leo often gathered the bishops and the Roman presbyters for joint consultations. Calling such a synod was not for the purpose of distilling a majority opinion or establishing a party line. In Leo’s time, a synod served to orient all to the normative apostolic tradition, with the bishops exercising their co-responsibility to ensure that the Church abides in the truth of Christ.

    […]

    Leo the Great (+461) was one of the first Bishops of Rome to give shape to what is now the modern “papacy”.   Note the direction of the “direction”.   From Leo to the bishops.  Why?  “To orient all to the normative apostolic tradition.”

    There is a huge difference between the situation of bishops in the 5th century and today.  For example, we have had seminaries for centuries.  We have over a millennium of theological reflection on the nature of the Church.  We have basic catechisms which you would think that today’s bishops would have been steeped in from childhood.   There is far deeper and more precise theological information for bishops today than ever there was in the 5th century.

    However, I am mindful of something that Benedict XVI wrote in his forward to his first book on Jesus of Nazareth.  HERE.  He wrote about Biblical scholarship that many have forgotten how to read Scripture properly.  They are technocrats who applied modern tools of investigation which pretty much dissects without truly understanding.   Instead, Benedict said that we ought to return to reading the Fathers of the Church and see how they read Scripture, and strive also to read like they did without abandoning modern tools of scholarship.  We have to recover from antiquity was had been obscured.

    Another pair of paragraph from Müller and then I will let you go… my emphases…

    […]

    As is well known, theoretical reflection on the principles of being, knowing, and acting is considerably more difficult than talking about concrete things. Thus there is a danger that an assembly of almost 400 people of different origins, education, and competence, engaged in unstructured back-and-forth discussion, will produce only vague and blurred results. Faith can easily be instrumentalized for political agendas, or blurred into a universal religion of the brotherhood of man that ignores the God revealed in Jesus Christ. In the place of Christ, technocrats can present themselves as saviors of humanity. If the Synod is to keep the Catholic faith as its guide, it must not become a meeting for post-Christian ideologues and their anti-Catholic agenda.

    Any attempt to transform the Church founded by God into a worldly NGO will be thwarted by millions of Catholics. They will resist to the death the transformation of the house of God into a market of the spirit of the age, for the whole of the faithful, anointed as they are by the Holy One, cannot err in “matters of belief” (Lumen Gentium). We face a globalist program of a world without God, in which a power elite proclaims itself the creator of a new world and ruler of the disenfranchised masses. That program and power elite cannot be countered by a “Church without Christ,” one that abandons the Word of God in Scripture and Tradition as the guiding principle of Christian action, thought, and prayer (Dei Verbum).

    […]

    I agree with His Eminence on that point about the faithful.  The FAITHFUL will because of the sensus fidei fidelium.   However, not all the “faithful” are FAITHFUL.   Sensus fidei is not automatic.  It is fostered, maintained, enriched for a lifetime.  Do all the “faithful” do that?  Not by any stretch of the imagination.

    Therefore, I think we have to make a serious commitment to know our FAITH well and be, as Peter, says, “always ready”.

    What do you do to foster, enrich and maintain?  For yourself and others?

    Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Synod, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices |
    7 Comments

    ROME 23/10 – Day 28: Dies natalis, some observations, some prayer

    Sunrise today seems a loooong time ago at 07:35 and it set quite a while ago at 18:12.  The Ave Maria bell didn’t ring at 18:30.

    It is the Feast of Sts. Simon and Jude.  It is my 64th birthday.

    Almighty God, thank you for knowing me before the creation of the cosmos.  Thank you for calling me into existence here and now because you wanted me to be active here and now as part of your chosen “corps”.  Through the intercession of your Apostles, take me in Your hands even more tightly, for the days are hard there is so much to do.

    Welcome new registrant:

    Truthbetold
    SAT23

    Thanks new monthly donor.

    ceb

    It is late and I am frustrated trying to upload videos that I haven’t processed.  My laptop, which is making odd noises which I don’t like, can’t process them fast enough to allow me to post today, it already after 9pm and I am just now preparing my first meal of the day.  I’ll get to them.

    I want to give you at least, my dear dear readers, a taste of the day.  Last night too.

    Last night Vespers were celebrated in Pantheon as part of the Summorum Pontificum Pilgrimage.   So many good people and such good will.  The musicians were good, but the planning was bad because the acoustics in there are IMPOSSBILE.  You would think that, by now, the organizers would know that.

    As I said, I have videos but… sheesh… they won’t upload until I do things to them.

    Today was the procession to St. Peter’s.  It was surely an act of hopeful resistance.  I have in mind the march to the sea to make salt in Ghandi’s time.  Soldiers beat them and they still went forward.

    This year, they permitted NO MASS.  Instead, the hour of Sext.  Wow.  Sext.

    Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

    The procession arrived at St. Peters and they sequestered the clergy to stand in the sun and send the participants through ONE dedicated security post… ONE though there were more personnel for others.  They did this, I suspect, I don’t know for sure, on purpose.  We stood in the sun, a few clouds and breezes to help, well over 45 minutes.  People were still being cattle processed when they let us go in with what we had.   My heart went to the people STILL WAITING who had travelled so far to be there.

    At the confession of St. Peters there was a cobbled up rite for veneration of the tomb of Peter.  Not bad.  I asked the organizers, however, a serious question.  If you weren’t going to have the reading from the Gospel about Peter and the keys in Latin (which all would have recognized) why on earth did you choose to pick a reader for the English version who was not a native speaker?  Look to the left and the right… there’s a WELL-KNOWN BRIT… there’s a WELL-KNOWN American!  What’s with the Eurocentric BS we have seen for so long?   If it weren’t for the traditional Catholics in the Anglophone world…. heh… let’s just see what would happen, Europe.   I digress.

    Sext was at the Altar of the Chair.   There was zero coordination between the musicians, who were good, and the ceremony crew.   The MC seemed completely bumfuzzled.  The choir skipped the hymn and then changed tempi every few minutes for the singing of the psalms and then completely forget the prayers after the Marian antiphon.   The clergy were bemused and resigned.  I was irritated.  WE HAVE TO DO BETTER.

    For example… for the conference on Saturday, for which they advertised that people would be fed, they ran out of food.  That meant that many people scattered to not too close places to eat and they didn’t return for the second half.   Really?

    I digress.

    I think these people are wonderful, these organizers, but I feel like they mailed it in.  That’s what “they” want.

    I spent time venerating the tomb of the Apostles.

    It was uncanny.   I went waaaay up to the altar (where I used to say Mass often back in the day) and knelt to pray.  On cue, one of the nasties of the basilica showed up to change candles blah blah.

    After Mass in the evening some of the guys practiced for the Pontifical Mass at the Faldstool tomorrow.   THEY are not going to mail it in.  No, I am not on the crew.   Eurocentrism reigns here.

    I, weary, slid out the side door and went…

    I have some salad and some chicken and some egg

    Meanwhile,… white to move.  This is a GREAT puzzle!  Do your best.

    NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

    Interested in learning?  Try THIS. He helped my game.

    I simply must post this again.

    Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

    Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
    17 Comments

    WDTPRS – 30th Ordinary Sunday: “E ‘n la sua volontade è nostra pace… In His will is our peace.”

    In the Novus Ordo this Sunday it is the 30th Sunday of what an old friend of mine (rest in peace) called “Greater Meatloaf Season”.

    Let’s look at upcoming Sunday’s Novus Ordo Collect.  This prayer has a precedent in the 1962MR as the Collect for the 13th Sunday after Pentecost. It was also in the Veronese and Gelasian, ancient sacramentaries both.

    Omnipotens sempiterne Deus, da nobis fidei spei et caritatis augmentum, et ut mereamur assequi quod promittis, fac nos amare quod praecipis.

    OBSOLETE ICEL (1973 translation of the 1970MR):

    Almighty and ever-living God,
    strengthen our faith, hope, and love.
    May we do with loving hearts
    what you ask of us
    and come to share the life you promise
    .

    SUPER LITERAL TRANSLATION:

    Almighty eternal God, grant us an increase of faith, hope and charity, and cause us to love what You command so that we may merit to obtain what You promise.

    CURRENT TRANSLATION:

    Almighty ever-living God,
    increase our faith, hope and charity,
    and make us love what you command,
    so that we may merit what you promise
    .

    Today we pray to God the Father for an increase of the theological virtues: faith, hope and charity.

    click

    By baptism we were endowed with a supernatural life. As the German writer Josef Pieper (+1997) wrote, a supernatural life can be described as having three main currents.

    First, we have some knowledge of God surpassing what we can know about Him naturally because He reveals it to us (faith).

    Second, we live by the patient expectation that what we learn and believe God promises will indeed be fulfilled (hope).

    Third, comes our  affirmative response of love of God, whom we have come to know by faith, and also love of our neighbor (charity).

    While natural human virtues are acquired through education and discipline, the three theological virtues faith, hope and charity are given to us by God. They are infused into us with grace at baptism.

    Looking at the positive development of the theological virtues, we can say that faith logically precedes hope and charity, and hope precedes charity.

    From the negative point of view, considering their unraveling and loss, we lose charity first of all, and then hope and, last of all, our faith. Charity is the greatest of the three, followed by hope and then faith.

    As an aside… there are many believers out there who have fallen away.  They need your help to return.  Faith is the last thing to go. Many who lead quite dissolute lives still believe.  A tiny coal preserved in the ash of a dead fire can be fanned to life with exposure and a little TLC, a few puffs of reviving air.  But I digress…

    The theological virtues perfect and elevate everything virtuous thing man can do naturally. They can be considered logically, one at a time, but are all three intimately woven together. St. Augustine (+430) says, “There is no love without hope, no hope without love, and neither love nor hope without faith” (enchir 8).

    The goal of the virtuous life, as we read in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1803), is to become like God. Living the theological virtues concretely reveals God’s image in us as well as the grace He gives to His adopted children. Today we pray for their increase.

    This Sunday we also pray to love what God commands.

    Doing what another commands is not always pleasant. Our wills and passions rebel and we prefer to command rather than be commanded.

    It is easy, from the worldly point of view, to think that by being the commander, rather than the commanded, we can find peace. Surely each one of us desires peace and happiness and we seek after the means to attain them. If we attach our hopes to the created, passing things of this world to find peace and happiness we are inevitably disappointed.

    All created things, including people, can be lost. They cannot be the foundation of lasting peace. Even the fear of their loss lessens our peace in this world.

    God alone gives the peace and happiness we seek. He alone is eternal, unchanging, forever trustworthy. We cannot lose God unless we ourselves reject Him. And, in the end, God, the source of peace, remains in command.

    Esolen’s translation is very good.

    In Canto III of the Paradiso of the Divine Comedy the poet Dante is in the Heaven of the Moon. He encounters the soul of Piccarda. Dante queries her about the happiness of the blessed in heaven wondering if somehow, even in heaven, souls might be disappointed that they do not have a higher place in celestial realm.

    In response Piccarda utters one of the greatest phrases ever penned or recited (l. 85):

    In His will is our peace.
    It is that sea to which all things move,
    both what it creates and what nature makes…

    We are all made in God’s image and likeness, made to act as God acts. He reveals something of His will to us. When we obey Him we act in accordance with the way He made us and what He intended for us. In obedience we find happiness and peace, even amidst the vicissitudes of this troubling and passing world.

    Our Collect prays that we “love what you command”. This is a prayer for happiness. The theological virtues provide the key.

    E ‘n la sua volontade è nostra pace.

    In His will is our peace.

    Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS |
    2 Comments

    ROME 23/10 – Day 27: Making history

    The sun rose at 07:34, later and later.  It will set at 18:14, earlier and earlier.

    The Ave Maria should ring at 18:30.

    Welcome registrants:

    AnthonyBongiovanni
    EAW
    Maribill48
    Mathitis

    It is a dies non in the Vetus Calendar. Today I celebrated a Votive Mass of the Holy Cross.  I offered this Mass for my Roman donors.  I ask their prayers as well.

    A fun shot of priests at the side altars “concelebrating” with the beautiful new red vestments.  What a HUGE DIFFERENCE those vestments make.  Thank you again, donors.  THANK YOU.

    Breakfast with a friend.  I couldn’t wait to get to the fresh OJ.

    Last night I was at the presentation of the new Catechism by Bp. Schneider.  More HERE.

    Among the speakers was my good friend Robert Royal.  He made a great point about the ordering by God of the universe, which order reflects His presence and involvement.  The Catholic Faith is orderly.  You can see where this is going.  He started out with a quote from Dante’s Paradiso.  Beatrice says…

    e cominciò: «Le cose tutte quante
    hanno ordine tra loro, e questo è forma
    che l’universo a Dio fa simigliante.

    Cardinal Sarah is super focused when he listens. That takes practice.  Without question he is an expert listener.

    After the talk, I chatted with him for a bit and asked him how HE pronounces his last name, because every time he is mentioned it seems like there is a different way.  He said: “Sáh-rah”, not “Saráh” or like English “Sara”, etc.  “SAHrah”.

    During the Q&A the rep from Reuters asked Bp. Schneider what he thought about the new Dubia and Francis’ answer to those Dubia.

    The bishop responded with what I think most of us think.  The Dubia “a great work… heroic act”.  A “must needed action”.   The follow up was on the answers to the Dubia.  “Unfortunately unsatisfactory… confusing, vague”.    His answer was strong but respectful.  He also said that these Dubia will go down in history!  Card. Sarah did not offer an answer to those questions.

    Meanwhile, here’s a fairly easy one.

    White to move and win material.

    NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

    Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

    Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
    9 Comments

    IMPORTANT: Bp. Schneider’s new catechism. Wherein Fr. Z presents and rants about what’s going on.

    Before anything else, again and again I get questions like:

    “Things are going badly.  I feel like I have to do something, but I feel helpless.  I don’t have any power to stop what is going on.  What can I do?”

    Do these things and you will be more at peace and you will be more effective in your particular vocation and sphere of influence.

    • Strive to be in the state of grace: examine your conscience daily and GO TO CONFESSION
    • Use the sacraments and sacramentals well.  You are baptized, which means you are incorporated into Christ’s Person. You are confirmed with the seal of the Holy Spirit.  Are you sacramentally married, ordained?  Call upon those sacraments with confidence.
    • Do not forget that God called YOU into existence HERE and NOW, not somewhere else or in some other time.  You are part of “His team” whom He knew and chose before the creation of the cosmos.  God will give you all the actual graces you need to do His will according to His plan.
    • God makes His works our own and gives us the strength to carry them out.  We live by grace and elbow grease.  Get to work.   Get to work and and let God judge your successes, because He knows more than you do.  You cannot fathom in the moment of the doing what fruits your grace-informed efforts will bear down the line.
    • You cannot love or give what you do not know or have.  Therefore, you must learn your faith well.  Read a) Scripture, b) lives of the saints c) sound catechisms, d) tried and true spiritual and devotional writings and prayer books.  Always be ready to GIVE reasons for your faith.  This is the work of a lifetime, not just early years and then coast.

    Speaking of catechisms and speaking of being at peace…

    Last night I attended the Rome presentation of Bp. Athanasius Schneider’s catechism entitled Credo: Compendium of the Catholic Faith published by Sophia Institute Press.

    US HERE –  UK HERE

    I did not have time last night to ask my question during the Q&A, but I approached Bp. Schneider afterward (he and I were at the Augustinianum together back in the day).  I asked him if his new catechism presupposes some knowledge, some idea of Christianity or the Catholic Faith in order to be helpful or could a person with zero knowledge or experience use it effectively.

    He responded that, in his opinion, a person with no previous background in the Faith could use the new catechism.  There are foundational sections that be introductions for people who have never known anything about the Faith before.

    This would be a good gift for people with little of no knowledge of the Faith.  It would be an excellent resuscitator for the fallen away.  It would be a great review for the practicing and committed.

    Priests could find in it a rich resource for preaching (and the confessional) because it deals with things that previous catechisms could not, because they weren’t issues when those catechisms were composed.   Gender ideology, trans stuff, environment, COVID lockdowns, etc…. they’re in there.

    One of the presenters last night was the great Robert Card. Sarah, from whose writings we glean that he fasts and spends a lot of time in silence and prayer before the Blessed Sacrament.

    Last night Card. Sarah, one of the newest set of “Dubia Cardinals”, told us in Italian – his remarks were live streamed and the video is available HERE – that …

    … the Church is not in crisis, the Church’s pastors are in crisis.

    Card. Sarah has made a distinction, and qui distinguit bene docet… He teaches well who makes distinctions.

    I’ll riff on that. 

    The Church is the bride of Christ.  Her four “marks”, her characteristics identifying her, are known to us: unity, holiness, catholicity and apostolicity.   These cannot be overturned or rooted out or morphed into what they are not.   It is not possible.

    Christ gave the Church two gifts to ensure her mission until His return: indefectibility and infallibility.   These cannot fail or be removed by any human agency, by an individual or by a multitude.

    Remember that in Matthew 16 Christ gave to Peter (and his successors) an office and gifts to guarantee that office.  After Christ did this, Peter screwed up by defying God’s will for Christ and was called by Christ a “satan”.  Peter fled the Garden.  Peter denied the Lord.  Peter was challenged by Paul in Antioch regarding Gentile Christians and Jewish practices.  Not everything Peter and his successors would do would be protected by the Holy Spirit.  Only some things.  When in the Council of Jerusalem all the debate was done, James, the local leader, handed the whole thing over the Peter.  Ultimately, Peter manifested that the Holy Spirit was with him in the most important moments.

    The attributes and gifts of the Church are guaranteed by the Holy Spirit.

    The Holy Spirit cannot be pitted against the Holy Spirit.

    If there is ever a claim that an immemorial teaching of the Church regarding the faith and morals, guaranteed to be true by the working of the Holy Spirit, must now be changed because of the working “of the Holy Spirit”, then the claim is wrong not the immemorial teaching.

    Last night in his speech, Bp. Schneider brought in the 5th century theologian Vincent of Lérins who said in Commonitorium 4 (my emphases):

    What then will the Catholic Christian do, if a small part of the Church has cut itself off from the communion of the universal Faith? The answer is sure. He will prefer the healthiness of the whole body to the morbid and corrupt limb. But what if some novel contagion tries to infect the whole Church, and not merely a tiny part of it? Then he will take care to cleave to antiquity, which cannot now be led astray by any deceit of novelty. What if in antiquity itself two or three men, or it may be a city, or even a whole province be detected in error? Then he will take the greatest care to prefer the decrees of the ancient General Councils, if there are such, to the irresponsible ignorance of a few men. But what if some error arises regarding which nothing of this sort is to be found? Then he must do his best to compare the opinions of the Fathers and inquire their meaning, provided always that, though they belonged to diverse times and places, they yet continued in the faith and communion of the one Catholic Church; and let them be teachers approved and outstanding. And whatever he shall find to have been held, approved and taught, not by one or two only but by all equally and with one consent, openly, frequently, and persistently, let him take this as to be held by him without the slightest hesitation.

    Finally, at the end of his own talk last night, Bp. Schneider said:

    Let us humbly ask the Lord to grant us through the intercession of our Lady the grace to be able to say, “I know my Catholic Faith. I will not permit to be confused. For the sake of this Faith I am ready to die.”

    “I know my Catholic Faith.”

    “I will not permit myself to be confused.”

    Do you know your Catholic Faith?

    If you are disturbed, confused by what you see going on in the Church and in the world, perhaps also in your smaller world of your family and other relationships, take my advice in the points I made at the top, which include learning and reviewing your Catholic Faith with sound, time-proven catechisms – Bp. Schneider mentioned the Baltimore Catechism – as well as new tools from reliable sources such as this new compendium.

    Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
    14 Comments