Daily Rome Shot 646 with Friday appropriate fare

Minestra de Broccoli Romaneschi ed Arzilla with a glass of Malvasia puntinata.

Photo by The Great Roman™

Broccoli Romaneschi, by the way, are an entirely different critter from regular Broccoli.

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Meanwhile…

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

There are other programs and packages, too.  Check it out, as it were.

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

Meanwhile, chess.com is blazing fast this morning.  They must have integrated new servers and gotten the scaling and writing problems worked out.

Welcome new registrant:

PadreRon

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

Responses to Card. McElroy’s essay in Jesuit-run Amerika

Jesuit-run (who else?) Amerika ran a piece by – and this still has me shaking my head – Card. McElroy of that key See of San Diego, suffragan to Los Angeles.  The Amerika piece is a dreadful obfuscation of Catholic moral teaching and defined doctrine, wrapped in a fog of cliches about synodality (“walking together”) and buzz words like “inclusion”, “dialogue”, “pastoral”.

In effect, McElroy wants to change the Church’s teachings on homosexual acts, sexual activity outside of marriage and admission to Communion and the ordination of women.  The real basis of his arguments?  “Because!  Spirit!”

At The Catholic Thing there is concise unmasking of McElroy’s essay, which I warmly recommend that you look at.  “A Road To Nowhere” by Stephen P. White.  HERE

Somewhat less diplomatic is Rod Dreher at American Conservative who penned a note called Cardinal ScrewtapeHERE

One of McElroy’s premises deserves special recognition.  He will go on to claim that those who hate homosexual acts that a sinful really hate the sinners, not the sins.  That’s, of course, a plain lie that we reject with scorn.  Here’s McElroy:

It is a demonic mystery of the human soul why so many men and women have a profound and visceral animus toward members of the L.G.B.T. communities. The church’s primary witness in the face of this bigotry must be one of embrace rather than distance or condemnation. The distinction between orientation and activity cannot be the principal focus for such a pastoral embrace because it inevitably suggests dividing the L.G.B.T. community into those who refrain from sexual activity and those who do not. Rather, the dignity of every person as a child of God struggling in this world, and the loving outreach of God, must be the heart, soul, face and substance of the church’s stance and pastoral action.

It is a “demonic mystery”.  Since McElroy brought up demonic, which he pins on those who think homosexual acts are sinful, let’s bring in another voice.

In her Dialogues (ch 124), St. Catherine of Siena’s conversations with God, the Doctrix of the Church writes that the Enemy, demons, incite people to unnatural sins (homosexual acts) but that they don’t stick around to see it happen, because those acts  are too repulsive even for them.

Those acts are so contrary to nature that they offend their angelic intellect, even though they are fallen and apostate.   They want the sin to take place and they incite it, but it is so offensive to them that they absent themselves when it is happening.

Here she describes demons inciting men to these acts.  GOD is talking at this point.

“I wish thee to know, dearest daughter, that I require in this Sacrament from you and from them as great purity as it is possible for man to have in this life. On your side you ought to endeavour to acquire it continually. You should think that were it possible that the angelic nature should be purified, such purification would be necessary with regard to this mystery, but this is not possible, for angels need no purification, since the poison of sin cannot infect them. I say this to thee in order that thou mayest see how great a purity I require from you and from them in this Sacrament, and particularly from them. But they act in a contrary way, for they come full of impurity to this mystery, and not only of that impurity to which, through the fragility of your weak nature, you are all naturally inclined (although reason when free-will permits, can quiet the rebellion of nature), but these wretches not only do not bridle this fragility, but do worse, committing that accursed sin against nature, and as blind and fools with the light of their intellect darkened, they do not know the stench and misery in which they are. It is not only that this sin stinks before Me, Who am the Supreme and Eternal Truth, it does indeed displease Me so much and I hold it in such abomination that for it alone I buried five cities by a Divine judgment, My Divine justice being no longer able to endure it. This sin not only displeases Me as I have said, [NB:] but also the devils whom these wretches have made their masters. Not that the evil displeases them because they like anything good, but because their nature was originally angelic, and their angelic nature causes them to loathe the sight of the actual commission of this enormous sin. They truly enough hurl the arrow poisoned with the venom of concupiscence, but when their victim proceeds to the actual commission of the sin, they depart for the reason and in the manner that I have said. Thou rememberest that I manifested to thee before the plague how displeasing this sin was to Me, and how deeply the world was corrupted by it; so I lifted thee with holy desire and elevation of mind above thyself, and showed thee the whole world and, as it were, the nations thereof, and thou sawest this terrible sin and the devils fleeing as I have told thee, and thou rememberest that so great was the pain that thou didst receive, and the stench of this sin, that thou didst seem to thyself to see no refuge on this side of death, in which thou and My other servants could hide so as not to be attacked by this leprosy. Thou didst see that thou couldest not remain among men, for neither small nor great, nor old nor young, nor clerics nor religious, nor prelates, nor lords, nor subjects, were uncontaminated in body or mind by this curse.

God made it pretty clear to St. Catherine what the truth is about sodomy and all the other unnatural acts that fall into that fell category.   So hideous, so offensive are those sins that even demons who provoke them won’t stick around while they are being committed.  Demons can, however, and will, stick around the places where those acts were committed.

This is clear, charitable talk.  It is not the vague and slippery lulling of certain homosexualist activists who are so very popular with those who have given into the wisdom of the world.

Posted in Liberals, Sin That Cries To Heaven, Synod, The Drill | Tagged
36 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 645 and an Action Item!

Photo by The Great Roman™

Welcome registrants:
jerryforZ
Christine Rose

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Meanwhile,


NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Interested in learning?  Try THIS.

Meanwhile, at Tata Steel, Magnus Carlsen has climbed back to 3rd at 6/10 with  He is behind Nordibek and Anish.    There are three rounds left.  Can he pull it off?

Meanwhile, chess.com is undergoing a serious evolution.  Their servers are overwhelmed with the numbers of new subscribers.  502 pages are common. The numbers are astonishing.  From a couple of days ago, chess.com put out an article explaining that they had 300K new subscribers in a single day.  31.7 million games were played on 20 January alone.    The databases can’t write fast enough.

Chess is exploding.

With that in mind, I’d like to mobilize the readership in an ACTION ITEM.

Does anyone know a Catholic Grand Master who practices not just chess but the Faith (preferably in a traditional way).  If so, I have a proposal.  Write to me HERE with “Catholic Grand Master” in the subject line.

 

Posted in Chess |
4 Comments

ASK FATHER: How do you argue with extreme fringe trads that the Novus Ordo is valid?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I am asking advice that you’d think you’d never be asked to do – how to defend the Novus Ordo.  No, I don’t mean to defend it as being superior to the TLM – trust me, I’d never do that either.  What I’m trying to do is defend it as legitimate – from a TLM point of view.  One of the things I’ve experienced in the TLM community is the stereotypical vitriol from the extreme fringe that declares the NO as completely illegitimate, even heretical – something I know is not true and also gives the other 99.9% of the TLM community a bad name.  I know that there’s a way to express the validity of the NO while being true to the true faith of the TLM – but I don’t know how to express it without looking like a V2 sellout without any authority behind the defense.
I think that’s what I’m more concerned about – that those fringe extremists who have a public platform make the rest of the TLM faithful look no better than the “Happy Clappy” bunch who think TLM adherents are schismatic.  Thank you for any advice and wisdom.

I’ll keep this short.

The Novus Ordo, like it or not, is a valid rite for Mass.  Period.  It is a waste of time to argue with anyone about this.   Don’t fritter valuable minutes of your life tangled up in the chattering Id of that kind of Traddydom.

Just be polite to them and move on.

One can spend time discussing the merits of certain aspects of the Novus Ordo, of course.  Examples: Was it what the Council Fathers wanted? (A: No)  Has it helped to usher in the great post-Conciliar Springtime? (A: No)  Is it artificially cobble-together (Ratzinger’s view) in such a way that it almost by itself invites liturgical abuses? (A: Yes).   Has it done more harm than good to the identity of Catholics across generational and geographical divides since it was implemented and in the way it was implemented?  (A: Yes) Is it worthwhile to compare the two different Rites? (A: Yes)    Is the Novus Ordo completely without any merits at all? (A: No)

Brush the assertions made by those who say that it is invalid off of your cuff and do something more worthwhile, like reading the Fishwrap or Jesuit-run Amerika or one of Francis’ airplane pressers.

Yes, even looking at those is time better spent than arguing with someone over the validity of the Novus Ordo.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Id of Traddydom | Tagged
41 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 645 – Obsculta, O fili, praecepta magistri!

Photo by The Great Roman™

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit. Even if you use SMILE, don’t worry! SMILE still gets the donation.

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Meanwhile, …

White to move.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

I recently received a copy of Cardinal Ildefonso Schuster’s Commentary on the Holy Rule of Saint Benedict by Angelico Press, originally printed in 1945

Those of you who followed my podcasts during Advent will recall the insights of this great Benedictine Abbot who became the Cardinal Archbishop of Milan.  He was a commentator on liturgy and is also a Blessed, beatified by John Paul II in 1996.

US HERE – UK HERE

As the preface says:

For Schuster, however, the Rule is not simply a document meant for sixth-century Italy. He argues repeatedly that St Benedict composed the Rule as part of a conscious strategy on the part of the Roman See to bring unity and discipline to Latin monasticism and thereby harness its energy for the sake of the evangelization of the new peoples of Europe. Schuster believes, therefore, that the Rule was always intended to be universal in its application, and he makes a point of describing how its provisions were lived in the Benedictine tradition throughout the succeeding centuries.

Our various societies are falling to pieces under the constant hammer blows of the left and the crushing juggernaut of perversion. With the Church, as well. Add to these the attack on sacred liturgical worship and the result is a vision of the future that begs a) a large destructive comet and/or b) the Parousia. Both would be fine. Meanwhile, here we are.

The Rule of Benedict was a graced and inspired source of light in troubled times. Perhaps it can give us some direction also today.

Welcome registrants:

Little Flower of St. Therese
Pattylovestoshop

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
3 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 644 with overload

Photo by The Great Roman™

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Meanwhile,

Black to move and win material.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit. Even if you use SMILE, don’t worry! SMILE still gets the donation.

The traditional Benedictine monks of Le Barroux make great wine! Help them out.

Also, chess is growing leaps and bounds. Today I encountered this…

Also, on about the only network TV show I follow, Blue Bloods, park chess players were featured in the latest episode. They’ve been around forever, of course. But the makers of these shows follow trends and this show also deals with current issues.

And if you have never seen Searching For Bobby Fischer you should give it a try.

Right now at Tata Steel, Uzbeki Nodirbek Abdusattorov is in the lead with 6/8. Carlsen is in 7th place. As I right, Ding and Anish are battling back and forth.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments

You might be able to improve the preaching in your parish and change a priest’s life. Wherein Fr. Z suggests.

Sometimes I muse on the truly horrible formation we seminarians in the 80’s received in Sacred Scripture.  I broke through that deficit with my knowledge of classical languages and studying Patristic Theology at the best place to do so in Rome.

We tend to learn in plateaus.  We have break throughs and then settle in.  After a while we climb again.

This was my experience with Scripture, at least.  I have to give due credit for this especially to the St. Paul Center for Biblical Theology and the work of Scott Hahn.

I saw a sample video of a new course they are offering, in particular for priests, but for lay people as well, on the upcoming readings for Sunday Masses in the Novus Ordo.

The video left me thirsty.  That’s the best way I can describe it.  I simply wanted more and more.  Isn’t that how this is supposed to work?  What did the Emmaus disciples say after the Word broke open the Word?

I warmly recommend that you consider getting a gift subscription for your local priest.  Check with him first, perhaps, in case he already got it.

My suspicion is that you will note a change in his preaching, if he is sticking to the readings (which is pretty much de rigueur in the context of the Novus Ordo).

>>HERE<<

Do not hesitate to get a gift subscription for priests who say only or mostly the Vetus Ordo.  Scripture is Scripture is Scripture.  Contrary to popular belief there is quite a linkage between readings of the Vetus and the Novus, though sometimes that link is through parallel passages.

PRACTICAL NOTE: Once you are at the Word of the Lord page, scroll down to see “Purchase gift subscription”.  Once you do that, you receive information which you can pass on to the person for whom you bought it. It’s a bit clunky, but I suppose it works.

I’ve been making up over the years for lost opportunity from seminary, especially.  Give your guys a hand up.

And I self-interestedly wouldn’t mind a subscription for myself.  Really.  (As above, check in case someone else stepped up.) [NB: Thank you MF for the subscription!]

PS: At the bottom of the subscription order form there is an “Order notes” box.  Tell them Fr. Z sent you!

Here is their sample episode for the 3rd Sunday in Ordinary Time (yesterday, as I write).

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

BTW… at about 31:30 or so, there begins a fantastic part about the sanctification of our work, no matter what it is.

Posted in ACTION ITEM!, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, Sermons, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
16 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 643 & inspirational video

This might not have been recorded in Rome, but this is as Roman as it gets.

I can see them rotating roles, each taking a turn.

Think of the love of the parents for these boys.  Those are mighty fine kid vestments.  That’s a mighty fine altar.

And to those priests out there who think that the real Roman Rite is toooo haaaard… well… get over yourselves and get to work.

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Meanwhile, there is a puzzle to be solved…

Black is up a Rook. White’s knight is hanging. White has forking possibilities. Look at that open b file.

White to move.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

I wonder if the parents of these boys… I assume they are brothers… have made sure they know how to play chess. This is the age that they should get into it.

If there is any chance that the parents see this, and they don’t have a chess set, contact me and I’ll send you one. Click HERE   And maybe some altar cards for that altar?

It’s a gift that lasts a lifetime.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit. Even if you use SMILE, don’t worry! SMILE still gets the donation.

And the monks of Norcia now have a third choice of beers! Triple!

Welcome registrants:

Juniper55
Domma
RickInGilbert
MrzReligion
revfrjohnjr
stdaniel

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
8 Comments

ASK FATHER: Am I cooperating with evil in my job by changing generic “he” on forms to gender neutral terms?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

My job with a state agency includes reviewing proposed regulations of other state agencies. For many years, when we did this task we would change old references to the generic “he” or “him“ to “he or she“. Now we are changing all the “he or she” references to “gender neutral” nouns such as “the individual”, “the applicant”, “the licensee”, etc. We actually avoid using pronouns as much as possible now. By participating in this editing process, am I cooperating in evil or commiting sin? I worry about that sometimes – that I am helping to advance the transgender agenda – but I would be in dire financial straits if I had to quit my job.

Languages have trends.  The over-arching trend is to simplify.  There are ups and downs, but that’s the trajectory.

Some people are ideologues who want to erase sex and gender (not the same) distinctions.  They use language as the Ministry of Truth does: force a change and you force people to think differently, erase words and you erase concepts.  That’s mostly evil, because they use blunt force to inhibit thought and free will. That’s contrary to human nature.

Other people are carried along in the prevailing trends and mostly unconsciously take on the prevailing styles of speaking, such as using “they” for “he”.

Unless one is morally culpable (he ought to know better because of his position, etc.) and cannot plead ignorance (there’s no excuse for a surgeon not to know how to suture) then most people who follow the trends are doing so without guilt.  In order for something to be sinful it has to be understood to be such and then willed and done anyway.

I don’t see anything wrong with changing a “he” to “the applicant”.  Wouldn’t applicant, in a sense, be more accurate?    These terms sound a little bloated, but they are at least accurate.

I would be more concerned… and who knows when this will be imposed… were you forced to allow the “applicant” to determine what pronouns are to be used on their forms (see… I just did it).

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices |
15 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 642

Photo by The Great Roman™

Welcome registrants:
Cynthia Berenger
Cogito2017
tom********@***.com

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit. NB: You can both use my links AND contribute through “Smile”! BOTH! It is not one or the other. Use my link and Smile still gets the contribution!

Meanwhile…

White to move.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments