ASK FATHER: How to deal with a priest who has a difficult personality?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Dear Father Z, I have a question about how to deal with a priest who has a difficult personality. He can be very rough and impolite in his language, even during Mass. He is known for loud public outbursts of anger, criticizing and even humiliating the priests under him in front of others, and the priests under him sometimes mention during meetings with the laity their difficulties with this priest. Personally, this priest once mocked me publicly for requesting items to be blessed. Today after Mass, he accused my young children in an unfriendly way of not saying their prayers after Mass, which was not true, and furthermore he had no way of knowing whether they had said their prayers or not. (I was not present.) My question is, as a layman, how to relate to such a priest? I understand everyone can have a bad day, but this is a pattern with this priest. I know some people might say, “find another parish”, but what if there is no other parish? What if, for example, you live on an island and this is the only parish you can go to? I try to take his outbursts as an occasion to be patient, and I pray for him. But it is scandalous, and now my children are afraid to go to this parish. I feel especially badly for the kids, who are confused by the example of a priest who behaves quite unfriendly and even rudely in public, and when he turns his criticism on them, they don’t know what to do. I do not mean to speak ill of him behind his back; I want to respect his priestly office, it’s just that I am confused about what to do and I hope you can help. Thank you for any advice you can give. God bless you!

This is a tough one.  I consulted with a few priests and bishops.  Here are some comments I received back from them.

1:

The questioner seems most sincere and willing to cut the priest some slack.  I can’t think of any better solution than for him to make an appointment with the bishop out of concern for the priest.  He could explain confidentially what’s been going on, so that the bishop or his delegate can be proactive in helping the guy.  Better this than having to remove the guy after a blowout or some embarrassing situation.

If I was on the bishop’s end of such a situation, I would appreciate the heads up.  As you know, it could be that the assignment is a bad fit, or alcohol, or something else.

2:

If she is willing to do it, she should ask to see the bishop.

3:

Obviously it can’t be allowed to go on. If the grownups can put up with a lot, the children cannot.

A wise elder pastor once said, when you’re not sure what to do, document, document, document. Gather up stories with names and dates and develop a pattern. That should demonstrate that what’s happening is not simply a priest having a bad day. It may point to a type of dysfunction such as alcoholism, or may point to his own troubled upbringing.  Then several men (perhaps a woman) need to set up a meeting with the priest. It’s a confrontation/intervention. If he’s unresponsive then it goes to the bishop. Follow subsidiarity and keep it local rather than to escalate right away to the chancery.

If the chancery does not take note, keep documenting, avoid the pastor, pray for him, and learn to suffer well. God is working out some mysterious plan. God may be driving the faith deeper into our hearts by suffering, purifying our yearning for affirmation, inviting is to share his own rejection. It can be spiritually fruitful. God will eventually take your part.

Z: 

I can’t do any better than these answers except to add: Pray for him.  It is hard to be angry in a bad way with someone for whom you are praying. Perhaps take on some mortification for his sake. Ask your and his guardian angels to help him on their level of action.

And, yes, if the priest doesn’t modify his ways after you present your case to him, go to the bishop.  The suggestion to document is very important.

NOTA BENE: I will be quite restrictive about comments under this post.  Frankly, I would appreciate responses from priests.  If there are some lay people who have been in a situation like this and it was handled either poorly or well, that might be instructive as well.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Priests and Priesthood |
18 Comments

Rome/Brooklyn 22/11 – Day 40: Stuck but not hungry… and not in Hungary

In Rome, the sun rose at 6:50 and will set at 16:57. The Ave Maria is still in the 17:30 time slot. The Moon is full and there are 53 days until the end of the calendar year. It is the Feast of the Dedication of St. John Lateran. Also, we venerate, St. Theodore a soldier martyr in c. 306 and Maria and Neon in the 3rd c.

In other news, I’ve been canceled… again. This time not by a wobbly bishop, but by a hurricane. I had notice today that my flight home was canceled and I’ve been rebooked to tomorrow.

When I left for Rome, there was a hurricane that moved my departure by a day. Coming back, the same. Perhaps I have an unexplored and unexploited superpower! In any event, I am with a friend here in NYC and well cared for.

Yesterday was pretty quite.  We went to a diner for an early lunch/late breakfast.

The coleslaw was quite good.  The soup and the BLT… meh.  I was asked what bread I wanted, which was rye.  Toasted?  No.  So, I got toasted white bread.  Hence, only the coleslaw is on display.

Why pink, I wonder?

Meh… but I do like diners.  I don’t know how they maintain inventory considering the extent of their menus.  In these diners you can get almost anything you can think of.  It’s not always perfect, but you can get some iteration.  Anyway, I am a great fan of diners: they are honest, no pretenses.  “You want that?  You got it.  Not perfect, you still got it. We can bring you somptin’ else or you can go … your self.”

Last night we, with a seminarian, trekked north to Flu Shing for Chinese.  I wanted to go back to a place where I’ve eaten the best Xiao Long Bao you would ever want. Eh-vur.

I was apprehensive about changes during COVID Theatre.  I checked online and the results were as unhelpful as they were for most Chinese restaurants.  I was worried we might not get a table, but, to my dismay, we got one right away.  Why?  We were the only people there.  Not a good sign.

Another bad sign was the “CASH ONLY” sign on the door.  “Hmmm….”

My heart fell as they gave us drastically reduced menus.  They had gone in the dim sum direction and not in a good way.  To my lasting horror… I can hardly bring myself to type… in addition to the several other variations of xiao long bao they were offering, on the wall there was written “chocolate xiao long bao”.

But there we were.  Should we stay or should we go?

We stayed.

We tried some standards… guotie.. jiaozi… meh… the signature xiao long bao were very good but they weren’t as good as they were before.

I asked the two workers if there had been a change of owner and cooks.  Grinning and nodding they said “No!”  I believe I may have been lied to.

Let’s get to the images.

Guotie on a fancy-shaped dish.  Fancy-shaped dishes in a place that is otherwise linoleum and formica are not a good indication.

Good?  Sure.  But I could and have made better.

Again.  They lacked … zip.

The signature dish trailed off the page, I’m afraid.

Again, good but a shadow of their former glory.  And the tops where the gather is were tough, which means that they were made in advance (for an empty restaurant) and injected and steamed later.  Good but … meh.

The seminarian wanted the beef and peppers and it was a good choice.   This was good.

Crispy spicy chicken.

This was also good.  Crispy was surely there.. indeed crunchy.  I think that, in the final analysis, it might have been over fried because it had a hard crunch rather than a soft crunch.  The flavors included cumin, which was welcome.  Good but I think they fumbled slightly with the timing.

This was something they had on the older menu.  The beans were excellent and abundant.

Crispy pork.

Here is a puzzle.  There was delightful crunchiness and sweetness to these shreds.  However the shreds were so fine that one wondered sometimes whether there was pork under that layer.  There was, but pork flavor took a backseat.  This was pretty good, all in all, but it could have been slightly more substantive in a porky way.

Walking back to the car we passed this place.   I asked a young Asian fellow, guiding his elderly cane-wielding grandfather (probably) if the food was good and he uttered an enthusiastic yes, with a nod and smile.  Who knows.  Maybe next time.

There wasn’t much else to the day other than a substantial jet lag induced nap.

Speaking of puzzles.

Black is threatening checkmate in one.   That means we better have a forcing check.  The force helps you discover the solution.  It isn’t hard, but it does have classic tactic.

WHITE to move.
NB: I may hold comments with puzzle solutions a little longer than others so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

3:16 isn’t just in John.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.

US HERE – UK HERE

Thank for this day, O Lord, even with its setbacks.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

8 Nov: Four Holy Crowned Martyrs: don’t fool around with demonic idols (aka Pachamama)

Today is the Feast of the Four Holy Crowned Martyrs.  They were sculptors in ancient Rome who refused to carve pagan demon idols.  Hence, they were killed by the Emperor Diocletian.

Their remains are in the Roman church of St. Marcellinus and Peter.  Greatly venerated by the Romans there is an interesting Basilica dedicated to them on the street that goes up the side of the Caelian Hill from the Colosseum to the Lateran Basilica (of which Dedication we celebrate soon).  I used to walk by this church, and San Clemente, every day on the way to university and often stopped in.   It is a Roman Station Church.

These martyrs refused to carve idols.

I wonder what they would think of Pachamama.  The garden adulation.  Setting up shop in a church.  Being carried around in St. Peter’s.  A demon idol cult bowl put on the altar of St. Peter’s.

Ponder that.

Meanwhile, these sculptors, as patron of sculptors, were highly regarded in the lofty days of Florence.  At the Church of Orsanmichele there is a statue group of them in a niche on the outer wall (the originals are inside, in a museum).  A friend in Florence sent pics:

In the museum…

In the Philadelphia Museum of Art you find a terrific Medieval collection, including a 15th c. altar piece from the same Orsanmichele.  Note that the one in charge over the torturers is being strangled by a demon.

The martyrs refused to have anything to do with idols.

Fool around with demons… you won’t win.   And if people on high fool around with demons, lots of people suffer.

Posted in Linking Back, Saints: Stories & Symbols |
8 Comments

Wherein Fr. Z apologizes

The other day I deceived you.

It wasn’t intentional, but “sorry!” nonetheless.

I had posted that St. Rita had seen the consistory list.   Well, she had, but the image I posted was not of St. Rita.

This is St. Hyacintha or Giacinta Mariscotti (+1640)

Of noble birth, she was disappointed in a marriage that didn’t happen and so entered the convent, where she lived a bad religious life with hidden food and luxuries but with a strong faith.

During an illness when a priest brought Communion to her in her cell, he saw the secret stuff and really let her have it. She changed her ways and became very ascetic, founding confraternities which helped the poor.  She died with a great reputation of holiness.

St. Hyacinta saw the consistory list.

I’ll try to find the full view of this lovely painting.

If you have a hard time living the disciplinary dimension of being an active and practical Catholic, you might ask St Hyacintha for help.

 

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged
Comments Off on Wherein Fr. Z apologizes

Election Day Prayer

I received this via email.  Just thought I would pass it along:

Perhaps some of you priests might want to add this to your arsenal.  May a bishop or two as well.

It’s a real thing.  Exorcist friends have told me how demons can screw with electronic equipment and make it do strange things.  And then there is the their ongoing work of temptations of poll workers to do things that are wrong.

Anyone who says this isn’t real is naïve… or complicit.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
3 Comments

Rome/Brooklyn 22/11 – Day 39: ‘Murica

Back in Rome sunrise was at 6:49.  Sunset should be at 16:59.

The Ave Maria ought to ring at 17:30.

Today in the Basilica of St. Peter is a Feast of all the Saints and Martyrs whose relics are in the Basilica.  It is also the Feast of St. Adeodatus I (+618) and of the Four Crowned Holy Martyrs (+306), whose church is on the slope leading from the Colosseum, past San Clemente, and up toward the Lateran.  I used to walk by there everyday for university when I was a seminarian.

Before heading out to airport yesterday, I had a couple things left over in the fridge, so this was breakfast.

Behind this wall and up the street is the Casa Santa Marta a certain person lives in humility, which meant that the whole place had to be redone and the street outside the wall, pertaining to the Comune di Roma, had to be secured at the cost of, lets just say very many Euro.  But it was all for humility, so that’s okay.

The Delta planes have a new “entertainment” system, which turned out to be not very entertaining.  There is a new swoopy 3D graphical interface for flight information.   And while there are lots of movies (lookin around the cabin some of them truly fitlhy), they eliminated all the games, etc.

There were problems with the system, too, in zone all over the plane which meant that they had to reboot the system I think six times, each time requiring two things, a) 15 minutes and b) that no one touch their screens.   Imagine how well that went.   So, as we flew along we had to …

…. wait… and wait… and wait.

I never get tired of this brilliant movie, and I always enjoy the sight of Rick working a chess position with his cigarette and cocktail glass.

Someone should do a count of how many drinks were ordered in Rick’s Café Américain and then not drunk.

The flight was boring, which is how you want flights to be, and everything from the taxi at my front door to airport check-in at FCO and customs and luggage collection on the ground at JFK went without flaw.  I skipped the meals on the plane.

A friend picked me up at JFK, where everything is a half mile walk away, and we got supper.   Cheeseburger, of course, with American cheese, of course, and onion rings.

The beer had the irresistible name of Delirium Tremens.

As I glanced out the window of the guestroom in Brooklyn, I saw a sight that wove the two ends of the day: the American flag and the trees, which are plane trees, the same as line the banks of the Tiber and other boulevards in Rome.

In the following, there is material to be won.  This is easy.

WHITE to move.

NB: I may hold comments with puzzle solutions a little longer than others so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Interested in learning?  This guy helped my game. Try THIS.

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
9 Comments

Rome 22/11 – Day 38: Se vedemmo, Roma

Today the sun dawned upon Rome at 6:48 and it will slip below the horizon at 16:59.  Shorter.  Ever shorter.  The Ave Maria is at 17:30. Today is a dies non on the Roman calendar, and so priests do well to celebrate a Requiem Mass.

We are still in the octave during which people can obtain the plenary indulgences.  Though we remember the dead in a special way today, one could take a saint from the Roman Martyrology such as St. Willibrord.

Black to move.

White has a couple of serious threats but is overworked.  Black has options, and the bishop pair and a wicked looking Queen Rook battery.  It is important to move carefully to avoid getting checkmated.   The first move is fairly straight forward, but… then what?

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.

US HERE – UK HERE

Thanksgiving might be more pleasant with excellent beer or wine, both made by traditional Benedictine monks.

I leave Rome today.  It has been fruitful.

I would like to return for Holy Week.

Thank you, benefactors.  You’ve had a lot of prayers and Masses here during this sojourn.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Rome 22/11 – Day 37: Gold, Alcohol, and You

The Roman sunrise was at 6:46 and the sunset is due at 17:01.  The Ave Maria is still slated for 17:30.  It is the 22nd Sunday after Pentecost and the Feast of St. Felix, of happy memory, about whom St. Augustine wrote in his Expositions of the Psalms.

Thank you for this day, O Lord.  It is my last full day in Rome.

What to post?   People had questions about my chalice.  I had brought it back to Rome to the shop where it was made, over thirty years of wear later.

I brought my chalice with me to Rome to have it restored.  I was going to do this for my 30th anniversary but, you know, Covid and Vaxes and Masks, oh my.  I took the precious thing to the shop where it was made.

Here are a couple of photos of them working on it.

In this, the goldsmith is opening up the settings of the stones on the node do allow more light to bring out their color.

This patently is work on the paten.

A based shot.

Years ago it was determined by the Sacred Congregation for Rites that the re-gilding of a chalice required re-consecration.

I found a bishop whom I highly respect to do the honors.  I will now have the pleasure of thinking also of him when I use the chalice.  We all win!

Things laid out and ready.  I won’t show too much of the lace, because I know that it upsets some less-than-sturdy minds as being restorationizing backwardist nostalgia and therefore “YOU HATE VATICAN II!” stuff.

That’s one pretty chalice, all in all.  Fully restored it is sump’n.

After the consecration, I immediately used it for Mass for the intention of the consecrating bishop, who was so kind.

In my conversation with the goldsmith about cleaning the chalice – FATHERS! SACRISTY PEOPLE! LISTEN UP! – I was told to use only very high percentage white alcohol to clean the chalice.  Everything else will damage, “eat”, the gold.   He told me that in the shop.  I wrote a note to him to ask if anything else could be used, some sort of polish or soap and water.

His answer:

“Pulire esclusivamente con alcool puro bianco. Tutto il resto potrebbe danneggiare la doratura…  Clean exclusively with pure, white alcohol.  Anything else could damage the gilding.”

This doesn’t apply to silver, but it WOULD apply to the gilding inside the cup of a silver chalice.  It would apply to a monstrance or paten or pyx or anything else that is gilded.

So, there should be bottles of 90%+ alcohol in sacristies, and not just to make limoncello.

In the USA we have “Everclear” at 95%.  There are other brands, too.  I saw one in an Italian store the other day: 96%.   I bought it and used it to clean the chrism and smudges from the consecration. It worked like a charm.  I’ll leave this bottle with the sacristan at Ss. Trinità.  They’ll either use it for chalice or The Great Roman™ will make limoncello out of it.  Either way is a good way.

Meanwhile, I was supposed to go to see the Van Gogh exhibit in Rome at exactly the time when morons interfered.  HERE  Another one of these climate change idiocies.  They threw vegetable puree at a painting and then glued themselves to the wall while shouting slogans about carbon and climate.   The contempt I have for these nitwits is nearly complete now.   How on earth did they get that stuff in there, given what has been happening?  ANSWER: It was probably an inside job, someone on the inside letting them into the gallery with their stuff.

Here’s another kind of puzzle.

BLACK to move.  You should get this one pretty quickly.

NB: I may hold comments with puzzle solutions a little longer than others so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Interested in learning?  Try THIS.

Meanwhile, the mighty Robert Card. Sarah has a new book, Catechism of the Spiritual Life.

US HERE – UK HERE

Chess and Card. Sarah.  It’s a good day.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
18 Comments

DIEBUS SALTEM DOMINICIS – 22nd Sunday after Pentecost

A while ago, I ran into a claim that in the near future devotion to the Holy Face of Jesus would be more and more important.

Think about how our ecclesial shepherds have, through neglect and even expressions of contempt, downplayed and eroded the pious devotional practices of the faithful.  Hence, I am inclined to think that any good, traditional Catholic devotion would be better than the wide-spread near-zero we’ve got going now.

That said, we cannot go wrong with contemplation of the Holy Face of the Lord, held up before us sometimes as a portrait, sometimes as a lens, sometimes as a mirror.

In our 1980’s seminary we were inflicted with the deadly musings of Edward Schillebeeckx in his then-recent The Church With a Human Face: A New and Expanded Theology of Ministry.  The heretic priest – he eventually quit – who taught the course which was supposed to be on Holy Orders and Eucharist (but was instead about “ministry and symbol”) used this trash.  While most of us seminarians… well, some… yearned for a formation about a Church resplendent with the face of Christ for her people, we were being told to obscure, nay rather, efface that transcendent face with the merely earthly.

There’s nothing wrong with stressing the real needs of breathing and living human beings in the Church and the care she has for them.  That’s not what this seminary agenda was about.  It was a total, systematic disfigurement of the Church’s teaching on the priesthood and Eucharist.  We could say it was a radical “defacing”.   À la Rahner, sacraments only celebrate pre-existing realities.  There’s no “transubstantiation”.  When an “ordained minister” says the words of “institution” (not consecration) bread and wine become a symbol of the unity of the community gathered in that place at that moment.  À la Schillebeeckx, priests – sorry, scratch that, ministers are called forth from the community. When the community’s “face” changes, they fade back into the community for another to emerge.

My apologies. We were instructed back then not to use the “p-word”, and instead refer to ordained and non-ordained ministers.  We are all ministers, you see.

And now we are all “walking together”.  See how this progresses?

Sadly, as these heretics in the seminary crucified Christ daily in the classroom and in the chapel and in their very quarters, I often had in mind the passage in Isaiah 52:

“His appearance was so marred, beyond human semblance, and his form beyond that of the sons of men”.

This, dear reader, is the pattern we see again and again in the Church.  If Christ suffered His defacing, so must Holy Mother Church and, with Christ, many of her priests.

It isn’t a coincidence that, today, priests of a certain type are being de-faced, cancelled.

We need now to have before our eyes even painful images of the Holy Face of Christ, not only in our both beautiful and battered neighbor, but especially in the Church in the world.

Perhaps the Gospel for this Sunday can help us face up to this need.

Today’s Gospel comes from Matthew 22, which describes the Lord’s final days in Jerusalem.  The previous chapter saw His triumphant Palm Sunday entrance.  Holy Week follows, during which hostility from the high and mighty mounted and mounted against our Lord.

At this point in Matthew, we’ve just heard the parable of the Wedding Banquet, which Holy Church presented during Mass a few weeks ago.  Hard on the heels of that eschatological lesson, a group of Pharisees and Herodians oiled their way up to Jesus with flattering words to lay a trap for Him.  They asked, “Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not?” (v. 17).  Keep in mind that at his “trial” a few days later Christ would be falsely accused of forbidding people from paying the tribute (Luke 21:2).

It is helpful to know that, in those times, the Jews had to pay two tributes, or taxes, one to the Romans and another to the Temple.  Taxation, tribute, was a sensitive issue.  Should the Lord have responded affirmatively, the Jews could have seen Him as a Roman collaborator, much as they would the hated Jewish tax collectors.  Had he answered in the negative, they could have accused him of sowing sedition against Rome.  Either way, a “yes” or a “no”, meant trouble.  Christ saw past their unctuous flattery and knew their wicked motive for asking.  He requested to see the “nomisma tou censou”, the tribute coin, a denarius, the famous standard “day wage”, sometimes translated as “a penny” as in the KJV.  There’s been some inflation since the KJV.

The Lord doesn’t deliver a parable here so much as a riddle (vv. 20-22).

Jesus said to them, “Whose likeness and inscription is this?” They said, “Caesar’s.” Then he said to them, “Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”  When they heard it, they marveled; and they left him and went away.

Again, context helps us to break open this nourishing bread of the Word.  The Gospel says Christ underscored not only the image on the coin, but the inscription.  His enemies responded “Caesar’s” and not some other great figure whose coins were in circulation.  It is most likely that the coin in question was a silver denarius of the adoptive son of Augustus, the Emperor Tiberius (+AD 37), which bore the image of Tiberius on the obverse with the inscription “Ti[berivs] Caesar Divi Avg[vsti] F[ilivs] Avgvstvs … “Caesar Augustus Tiberius, son of the Divine Augustus”.  In essence, “Tiberius, son of god”, for Augustus had been declared to be “divine”, like his adoptive father Julius before him.

It was a faceoff between the Son of God and the son of god, the ultimate worldly glorification of a mere mortal and the acknowledgement of the one true and living God.

Christ asked the Pharisees, “Whose likeness… is this?”  In the Greek he asks about the eikon which gives us the English “icon”.  Our Biblically oriented minds direct us back to the ancient Greek of the Old Testament, the Septuagint, and Genesis 1:27 where the same word eikon describes the creation of man in God’s image.

Putting aside controversy over Christian cooperation with or resistance to secular authority, “the state”, which over the centuries has been rooted in part in this encounter of Christ and the Pharisees, we are presented with what Paul later frames in terms of putting off the earthly man and putting on Christ, in whose image we are.  The more we are like Him in word and deed and inner orientation, the more we are good images of Him.

St. Ambrose of Milan (+397) wrote in his Commentary on Luke (9.34):

“Questioned concerning the penny, [Christ] asks about the image, for there is one image of God, another image of the world.  Therefore, the Apostle, also, admonishes us, ‘As we have borne the image of the earthly, let us bear also the image of the heavenly.’  Christ does not have the image of Caesar, because He is the image of God.”

In other words, the coin and its image of the Emperor with the false “son of god” stands for the world and its allurements.  We must detach ourselves from that image to see after the truer image.  In De officiis, the great Bishop of Milan says of the incident of the coin:

“You are laying aside the image of the eternal Emperor and setting up within yourself the image of death. Instead, cast out the image of the devil from the kingdom of your soul, and raise up the image of Christ.  This is the image that should shine in you, that should be resplendent in your kingdom, or your soul, the one which effaces all the images of evil vices.”

The Second Vatican Council’s document Gaudium et spes is not without its puzzles and its legitimate critics.  However, in the Christological section 22, we find, and please have patience with the extended quote:

The truth is that only in the mystery of the incarnate Word does the mystery of man take on light. For Adam, the first man, was a figure of Him Who was to come, namely Christ the Lord. Christ, the final Adam, by the revelation of the mystery of the Father and His love, fully reveals man to man himself and makes his supreme calling clear. …

He Who is “the image of the invisible God” (Col. 1:15), is Himself the perfect man. To the sons of Adam He restores the divine likeness which had been disfigured from the first sin onward. …

As an innocent lamb He merited for us life by the free shedding of His own blood. In Him God reconciled us to Himself and among ourselves; from bondage to the devil and sin He delivered us, so that each one of us can say with the Apostle: The Son of God “loved me and gave Himself up for me” (Gal. 2:20). By suffering for us He not only provided us with an example for our imitation, He blazed a trail, and if we follow it, life and death are made holy and take on a new meaning.

Christ, in whose image we are made, reveals man more fully to himself.  By gazing at Christ, risen and glorious, battered and defaced beyond recognition of man, we find ourselves revealed.

Jesus paid the tax for our sins with the coin of His face.

Shall we, in this time of dreadful and anxious need for our clearly struggling Church, turn away our faces?   We must look our challenges square in the face, remembering that concealed within them are the perennial enemies of our soul: the world, the flesh and the Devil.

Now is the time to pay tribute to the King, whom a week ago we celebrated as such in our traditionally oriented churches and chapels.

If not in churches, if it gets to that point, then on rocks in the forest and in people’s homes.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, WDTPRS |
10 Comments

YOUR URGENT PRAYER REQUESTS

PLEASE use the sharing buttons! Thanks!

In your charity would you please take a moment look at the requests and to pray for the people about whom you read?

Continued from THESE.

Let’s remember all who are ill, who will die soon, who have lost their jobs, and who are afraid.

I get many requests by email asking for prayers. Some are heart-achingly grave and urgent.

As long as my blog reaches so many readers in so many places, let’s give each other a hand. We should support each other in works of mercy.

If you have some prayer requests, feel free to post them below.

You have to be registered here to be able to post.

I ask a prayer for myself.  I’m dealing with a particular challenge right now.   I also want to thank all of you who pray for me.

Posted in PRAYER REQUEST |
15 Comments