WDTPRS: The new Latin Collect for Paul VI – a key phrase hunted up

In the Bolletino today we find liturgical decrees and texts pertaining to the celebration (in the Ordinary Form) of the recently canonized Paul VI.

His optional memorial will be 29 May, the annivesary of his ordination to the priesthood.  He died on the Feast of the Transfiguration, so that date didn’t work.

DECREE ON THE INSCRIPTION OF THE CELEBRATION OF SAINT PAUL VI, POPE, IN THE GENERAL ROMAN CALENDAR

COMMENTARY BY CARD. SARAH

ADDITIONES IN LIBRIS LITURGICIS RITUS ROMANI DE MEMORIA AD LIBITUM SANCTI PAULI VI, PAPÆ – LATIN [English not available]

Shall we look at the Collect to see what the prayer really says?

Deus, qui Ecclésiam tuam regéndam
beáto Paulo papæ commisísti,
strénuo Fílii tui Evangélii apóstolo,
præsta, quaesumus, ut, ab eius institútis illumináti,
ad civílem amóris cultum in mundum dilatándum
tibi collaboráre valeámus.
Per Dóminum.

Committo primarily regards “to join two things, connect”, or also “bring men or animals together to fight” (which certainly happened in Paul’s day), or “to perpetrate a crime”. Here, rather, we have the meaning of  “to place, commit to” constructed with aliquem alicui.  There are a couple of precedents in the post-Conciliar Missale Romanum. 

Strenuus is “brisk, vigorous, restless”. Illumino gives us illuminatiIllumino means, surprise, “to light up”.  There is a precedent in the new MR on the Feast of the Presentation.   An institutum is an “intention, plan, mode of life, instruction”. Dilato is “to spread out, amplify, extend”.

It might be trick to entangle what the last part means because of two words. Cilivis is “pertaining to citizens, civil, civic” or, digging down into the dictionary page, “relating to public or political life”. Cultus means, “care, a laboring at” or “training, education”, and “an honoring, veneration”, “manner of life”.

VERY LITERAL VERSION:

O God, who entrusted the governance of the Church
to blessed Pope Paul,
restless apostle of the Gospel of Your Son,
grant, we pray, that, enlightened by his teachings,
we may be able to collaborate with You
to make widespread the public cultivation of love.

This prayer is wordy, which is consistent with prayers of modern composition and inconsistent with the Roman liturgical genius.

QUAERITUR: What are we to do with that last bit?

“to spread a political movement of working for love”?

(And, there will be those wags who remind us that amor can mean sex. I’ll head that off here.)

Put that way, it seems that this is a call for some kind of “pacem in terris… peace on earth” is a highly desirable goal, this is not the primary role of the Pope or of the Church.  All you need is luv… luv.  Luv is all you need.  However, our goals are not, primarily, earthly.  Our sights are set on heavenly things, or at least that is what prayer after prayer after prayer in the Roman liturgy has prompted.

Nope, none of that was intended.

What is intended by that phrase, civilis amoris cultum is “civilization of love“, a phrase coined by Paul VI in a Regina caeli address on Pentecost Sunday, 17 May 1970.

È la civiltà dell’amore e della pace, che la Pentecoste ha inaugurato; e tutti sappiamo se ancor oggi di amore e di pace abbia bisogno il mondo! …  It is the civilization of love and of peace which Pentecost has inaugurated— and we are all aware how much today the world still needs love and peace!”

So, we should read at the end…

…grant, we pray, that, enlightened by his teachings,
we may be able to collaborate with You
to spread far and wide a civilization of love.

How did that little phrase – “civilization of love” –  become so tied to Paul VI ? After that first use in 1970, Paul used the phrase in 23 other documents during the last three years of his life, from 1975-1978.

Clearly, Paul wanted that phrase to linked to his teaching as a legacy.

He got it.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS | Tagged
3 Comments

Francis signed document saying that God willed the “pluralism and diversity of religions”. What’s up with that?

UPDATE 6 Feb 2019

Fr. Hunwicke posted a comment at his splendid blog.  HERE

Fr Zed has given a characteristically fine and intelligent interpretation of PF’s words. As have some others.

Having perused them, I am also rather interested in what some parts of the Jewish Community might think of any suggestion that the Holocaust was willed by God as part of His “permissive will”.

What Fr Zed and others have done is (this is not irony; I mean it) absolutely essential; it is truly necessary. In the great task which some future pontificate will inherit, of putting the Papal Magisterium back up on its feet after the disasters of this pontificate, it wo’n’t do just to say “That man was repeatedly, disastrously, wrong”. Because the obvious corollary of this is that any pope may be horribly wrong. The standing of the Successor of S Peter will need to be restored, for the good of the Chyrch and for however much time there will be before the End. So, surely, it will have to be said that there are ambiguities in his scripts which need to be interpreted carefully and authoritatively in order to rescue them, and him, from apparent heresy.

But I do think it is outrageous that pastors and academics should have to waste their time dreaming up these ‘interpretations’ of yet another PF disaster. By the way: was Cardinal Ladaria shown this text?  [Do I hear an “Amen!”?]


Originally Published on: Feb 5, 2019

I have recently paid as little attention as allowable to most of what is coming from the pens of Rome.  However, this needs some attention.

Francis and the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, Ahamad al-Tayyib, signed a document on “Fratellanza Umana per la Pace Mondiale e la convivenza comune… Human Fraternity for world peace and living together”.

The document presents some affirmations and aspirations. It contains the following head-scratching statement. Emphases mine…

Freedom is a right of every person: each individual enjoys the freedom of belief, thought, expression and action. The pluralism and the diversity of religions, colour, sex, race and language are willed by God in His wisdom, through which He created human beings. This divine wisdom is the source from which the right to freedom of belief and the freedom to be different derives. Therefore, the fact that people are forced to adhere to a certain religion or culture must be rejected, as too the imposition of a cultural way of life that others do not accept;

Do you get that?  “The pluralism and diversity of religions” is “willed by God”.

We must seek a way to understand this without it sounding like heresy.  Note well that, after that awkward phrase, the continuation speaks to our freedom to believe, etc.  That hints at a solution.

God did not will a diversity of religions in the sense that all religions are equal paths to God.  False religions are evil.  God does not actively will evil.

When we speak of God’s will we make distinctions.  God has an “active or positive will” and a  “permissive will”.    God’s “active will” concerns that which is good, true and beautiful.  On the other hand, God has a “permissive will” by which He allows that things will take place that are not in accord with the order He established.

For example, God created Adam and Eve to live a certain way according to their nature and His will.  However, He foresaw that they would fall and He permitted them to fall.  By His active will they were to live a certain way.  By His permissive will they strayed and fell.  In the end, even all that God permits to go wrong will eventually be righted.

Consider that a multiplicity of languages, which God imposed at the Babel incident in Genesis 11, was a sign of God’s disapprobation and medicinal punishment.  God willed that the people should rely on God, not on their own works.  He permitted them to defy Him and rely upon themselves.  The multiplicity of languages He imposed was a punishment for evil, ultimately meant to correct their behavior and also to foreshadow the Pentecost event.

Did God positively, actively will the evil heart-ripping religion of the Aztecs?   He permitted it.  The greatness of the Mother of God was shown to be that much greater when, by her intercession, that evil came to its end.

Did God positively, actively will the vast multiplication of Christian sects, contrary to Christ’s prayer “that they be one” and His positively willed act to found one, and not many, churches?

God wants certain things by His positive or active will.  God allows the contrary to take place by His permissive will.  In any case, nothing happens outside of the will of God, who is omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent.

God allows evil and brings forth greater goods from the evil He permits.

Read in this way, namely, that by God’s permissive will there are a multiplicity of religions, etc., that statement in the document, above, is acceptable.

If you read the statement to mean that by God’s positive or active will there are a multiplicity of religions, that’s an error.  That would impute to God the active willing of false religions and, therefore, evil, which is impossible and contrary to reason.

God cannot positively will evil.  God can only, by His nature, permissively will evil.

I don’t know what the writers of the document intended.   I’m just telling the truth about what is written.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, The Drill, What are they REALLY saying? | Tagged
68 Comments

PODCAzT 168: Concerning the Sermon at Mass

Here is a quick PODCAzT partly to get me going again and partly because the topic really got my mind going.

Today we hear from Martin Mosebach’s wondrous

The Heresy of Formlessness: The Roman Liturgy and Its Enemy (Revised and Expanded Edition) 

It am delighted that is in print again by the increasingly excellent Angelico Press.

May I warmly urge everyone to read this important book US HERE – UK HERE

Mosebach writes about the effects of ruptures in the flow of liturgy, and the moment of the sermon is one of them.

This should be a point of reflection for every priest and bishop.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, PODCAzT | Tagged , , , ,
4 Comments

JUST TOO COOL: A fine musical moment at a parish in Wandsworth (S. London)

A friend in England sent a short video which I feel compelled to share.

We are at the little parish of St. Mary Magdalen in a rough area of greater London, Wandsworth, in the Archdiocese of Southwark. I’ve been there a couple times, once, memorably, in 2010 to help as deacon for a Requiem Mass with really interesting modern vestments. On that occasion I met Joseph Shaw of the Latin Mass Society for the first time.  The highly esteemed Fr. Martin Edwards is the parish priest, good value and expert mixologist. Fr. Martin has the TLM on Sundays, bless him.  Father was a deacon at my ordination in Rome in 1991.  Small world!  One of his confreres was ordained with me.

My video sending friend wrote:

“A stirring rendition of Jerusalem after Mass today. Amazing what a live trumpet and a good organist can accomplish in a small chapel.”

That’s part of the point in posting this. Much can be done with little.

Cantare amantis est.

Play
Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
21 Comments

POLL: St. Blaise Day Blessing of Throats – 2019

Yesterday, Sunday, was also the Feast of St. Blaise, upon which we traditionally have the blessing of throats.

Did you receive a St. Blaise Day blessing of the throat?

You don’t have to be registered to vote… sort of like Chicago. Unlike Chicago, you have to be alive.

Pick your best answer.  You are registered and approved, use the combox to explain what happened.

Did you receive a 2019 St. Blaise Day Blessing of the Throat?

View Results

This year I was able to receive it because Fr. Heilman came over to church to help with Communion and the Blessings.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, POLLS | Tagged , ,
35 Comments

ASK FATHER: Use of 1964 Collectio Rituum, blessings and exorcisms in English?

From a priest…

QUAERITUR:

When using the older ritual of blessings, the ones still used at the time of the Second Vatican Council, some of the blessing itself could be done in the vernacular.  I have a Collectio Rituum that was printed in 1964 by Benzinger Brothers.  It was approved for use by the National Conference of Bishops of the United States of America.  Each page has two columns one with the texts in Latin and next to it text translated into English.

On page vi there is a translation of the Decree printed in Latin.  It reads:

“In accordance with art. 36, par 4, of the Constitution of the Sacred Liturgy of the Second Vatican Council, we the Bishops of the United States of America, decree that the following English versions of the liturgical texts are approved for use in the celebration of the sacred liturgy in our dioceses, within the limits established in the decree of April 2, 1964 …”

Am I able to use this 1964 Ritual and recite the various blessings and exorcisms in English?  Today, for example, I recited the blessing of the throats from the Collectio in Latin however, someone said that he would have appreciated it in English in order to understand what was spoken.  This Collectio includes, as well, the Blessing of Holy Water translated into English.  Is it permissible to recite it in English rather than Latin if advantageous for the people to grasp and participate interiorly.

The short answer is, “No.”  I’ll explain, below.

There are two issues here, which intersect: participation and use the vernacular.

I contend that use of the vernacular does not automatically result in “interior” participation (which is a desired goal).  Latin on the other hand can more effectively create an experience of mystery, lacking or diminished when the difficult signa of rites are reduced to a low common denominator.  But that is not the main topic of the question.

To the question: Can the Collectio Rituum be used and, therefore, can some vernacular be used in rites, especially involving exorcisms?

The issue of the use of the 1964 Collectio comes up once in a while.  The  “emancipation proclamation” of Benedict XVI, Summorum Pontificum, established that the books in force in 1962 can be used.  There was an 1961 edition of the Collectio in force in 1962.  That is the Collectio to use.  The differences are few, but important.

The 1961 Collectio accords with the 1954 and 1959 permissions which granted limited use of the vernacular.   In 1959 the Sacred Congregation for Rites permitted, in these USA at least, vernacular for sacraments excepting exorcisms, sacramental forms and blessings, and some other moments, such as prayers after funerals.

The 1964 Collectio gives wider use.  The 1964, however, also says – in memory serves – that forms of sacraments should be done in Latin.

In my copy of the 1964 – I don’t have a 1961 – I’ve put post-it notes over the English translation columns in those moments when only Latin must be used (chiefly exorcisms) and over Latin when I can use English.  Hence, I can use the 1964 book, but I use it in conformity with the 1961 edition.

Any of the “Weller” books, helpful as they are, must also be adapted in this way, since they were issued – I believe – in 1965.

Hence, NO, the exorcisms and forms of sacraments, etc., are to be done in Latin.  Most blessings I believe are to be done in Latin as well.

BTW… I have a red bound Collectio which originally belonged to “Iron John” Dearden, late Card. Archbp. of Detroit, and one of the ultimate liberals whose mess we are still stepping in even in our own days.  He started, for example, Call To Action.   I enjoy using his book when performing the traditional rites.   It’s a mild form of Schadenfreude.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Latin, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , ,
9 Comments

Bittersweet Review: Candlemas with the late Bp. Robert C. Morlino of @MadisonDiocese

One year ago today, the Extraordinary Ordinary celebrated a Solemn Pontifical Mass at the Throne for Candlemas, as he had done for several years.  HERE

Some photos

The music was provided by a visiting choir, the Schola Cantorum from Eau Claire. They sang, among other pieces, the Missa Papae Marcelli by Palestrina.

 

A sample of the music.  We had a great choir from Eau Claire.

A few snaps from beautiful Candlemas 2018.

Posted in Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
1 Comment

Blessed John Henry Newman’s 1849 poem “Candlemas”

Blessed John Henry Newman’s 1849 poem “Candlemas”:

THE Angel-lights of Christmas morn,
Which shot across the sky,
Away they pass at Candlemas,
They sparkle and they die.

Comfort of earth is brief at best,
Although it be divine;
Like funeral lights for Christmas gone,
Old Simeon’s tapers shine.

And then for eight long weeks and more,
We wait in twilight grey,
Till the high candle sheds a beam
On Holy Saturday.

We wait along the penance-tide
Of solemn fast and prayer;
While song is hush’d, and lights grow dim
In the sin-laden air. {280}

And while the sword in Mary’s soul
Is driven home, we hide
In our own hearts, and count the wounds
Of passion and of pride.

And still, though Candlemas be spent
And Alleluias o’er,
Mary is music in our need,
And Jesus light in store.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Poetry | Tagged , ,
1 Comment

ASK FATHER: Two hymns to memorize for times of danger

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Could you recommend 1-2 songs for all of us to memorize so, should we find ourselves being marched somewhere or on a plane in danger or any situation where we may be heading towards our death, we may sing these songs in unison. Thank you, Father, for all you do for us. May God bless you always!

Hmmmm…. lot’s of choices.

I’ll limit myself to English language hymns.  I’ll limit myself to hymns written by Catholics for Catholics.

How about…

  • Holy God, We Praise Thy Name
  • Faith Of Our Fathers.

There are a couple melodies for Faith Of Our Fathers, I believe.  Either one will do.

I am confident that everyone else reading this will be in exact agreement and will have no other suggestions.

o{];¬)

That said, I also suggest that priests memorize at least one Mass formulary, against the day that they are thrown into the future Democrat reeducation camps for torture and brainwashing.

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Semper Paratus, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice |
29 Comments

JUST TOO COOL: Eucharistic Procession throughout the entire school building

I received a good note about my home parish back in my native Minnesota, the famous St. Agnes in St. Paul.  I really need to get back there.

Dear Fr. Z.,

Thanks for all your work, especially in these trying times for Holy Mother Church. While you always cover fairly and accurately the tough stories plaguing the Church, you also share and encourage good news – well, here’s some good news!

I wanted to share about your old parish, Saint Agnes in St. Paul, Minnesota. The parish school is doing very well now with a Classical/Liberal Arts curriculum (it almost closed in the 2006-2007 school year). When Catholic schools rediscover their rich heritage, beautiful liturgy, and intellectual tradition they will thrive, and Saint Agnes is a great example of that.

This week, Catholic Schools Week, is actually Catholic at Saint Agnes School! Check out this video clip (about 20 seconds) of the Eucharistic Procession throughout the entire school building; the procession took about 30 minutes to bless all the rooms and all (approx.) 775 students. I’ve also attached a few pictures as well. The Lower School (grades PreK-6) students dressed in their “Sunday Best” for today while Upper School (grades 7-12) students were in full uniform. As you often note, rich liturgy and tradition are not “hard” and you can see in some of these pictures Kindergarten and 1st grade students kneeling and genuflecting before our Lord. Even little kids get it… in fact, they love it. See some of the reflections from our young students (3rd grade) attached. Here’s what our 1st grade teacher sent out today:

Hi all,

I asked the first graders how they felt during the Eucharistic procession and some students described it the following ways:

“I felt like my heart was on fire with love for Jesus.”
“It felt like it was another world visiting.”
“It felt like Jesus was giving me a hug.”
“I felt very joyful.”
“I felt love in my heart.”

They brought tears to my eyes. God bless Saint Agnes School!!

This is a “brick by brick” moment, and I hope other schools are inspired by it!

https://www.facebook.com/TheCatholicSpirit/videos/361235698049383/

As an old Italian bishop once growled, “Less chatter.  More processions!”

One of the pictures attached to the email.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
6 Comments