How credible is “credible” in allegations against priests?

The accusations – based on a repressed memory of something 40 years ago – about Fr. Eduard Perrone in the Archdiocese of Detroit continue to raise questions.  Dark questions.

Something is not right about this.

Michael Voris is digging in.  He attends Fr. Perrone’s parish, but this case is far far bigger than allegiance.  It concerns how accusations against priests are being handled everywhere, according to or not according to Canon Law the the Dallas “Norms” (which infamously don’t apply to bishops).

Voris has posted a couple of video commentaries at Church Militant.

In today’s video – “Anatomy of a Takedown” – there is something that everyone should listen to or read.  He provides transcripts of his videos.   Voris remarks today on the phrase “credible allegation”.

What he says should raise red flags and alarm bells in every Catholic everywhere in these USA.

Here’s the text.  If you want, you could swap out the proper names.  It seems to me that this could be applied pretty much everywhere right now, not just in Detroit.  My emphases:

[…]

The word “credible” which Msgr. Bugarin bandies about freely is, for all intents and purposes in American diocesan chanceries, a very dangerous word because it is being commonly employed in alleged clergy misconduct cases in an entirely different way than authorized by canon law.

In regular usage, it means exactly what it sounds like: “worthy of belief.”

But in the arcane language of canon law, it is a higher standard than what canon 1717 of the Code of Canon Law actually requires as a criterion to be used: “semblance of truth.” That is a positive determination, not a negative one. This gets a little into the weeds here, but allow us to explain because it’s important. God is, after all, in the details.

Currently, American diocesan officials are using the terminology “unless an allegation be manifestly false or frivolous” as the definition of a “credible” allegation.

This non-canonical definition actually shifts the burden of proof to the accused priest to demonstrate, not just allege in his defense, that any allegation made against him was “manifestly,” “obviously,” “evidently” false or frivolous, as opposed to the diocese actually having positive or affirmative evidence in support of a claim of sexual abuse.

That is a vast difference between common chancery Orwellian “newspeak” and the official canonical criteria legislated by the popes over many centuries.

When Abp. Vigneron and his non-independent review board and Msgr. Bugarin approved the use of the language against Fr. Perrone that the charge had a “semblance of truth,” that is grossly misleading.

In reality, the term, “semblance of truth,” according to the AOD itself in its own documents, is defined as “it is not manifestly false or frivolous” or “serious” or “substantive.” That’s from the AOD’s outdated Sexual Abuse of Minors Policy dating back to 2007.

Again, the phrase “semblance of truth” in canon law carries a vastly different meaning. It does not mean that any allegation is credible unless it can be rebutted as
“manifestly false or frivolous” by the accused priest.

However, according to the AOD’s and most diocesan sex abuse policies currently in effect, the practical bar that needs to be crossed in a case like this is extremely low — so low in fact that it’s almost laughable.

So for Abp. Vigneron to approve a press release with language like “credible” and “semblance of truth” is massively disingenuous and dangerous and a misleading account taken of what those terms actually mean, in the context of the AOD’s own actual policies, practices and posted Q&As found online on its website.

In short, they deliberately let the public think they mean something that they themselves say they don’t mean.

[…]

Did you get that?

I would very much appreciate comments of canonists on this.

Here’s how I read that.  The way “credible” is being used lowers the bar and results in placing the burden on the priest himself to disprove the allegation.  Meanwhile, a diocese/bishop, in effect, throws the priest to the wolves and has circumvented due process.  The are attending to secular advisers (lawyers, insurance companies) and worrying about the press more than the advise of sound canonists and in the interests of truth.

But it’s an efficient way to get rid of a troublesome priest.  And, these days, we know what “troublesome” means.

Here’s the video, which I have set to start just before the part I quote, above.

Posted in Canon Law, Clerical Sexual Abuse, Priests and Priesthood, The Drill | Tagged ,
8 Comments

Tour Talk – #TDF2019 @Le_Tour Stage 6

SPOILER WARNING (if you haven’t watched your recording)

The Tour continues.  Peter Sagan had an amazing sprint to win Stage 5 and Alaphilippe is still, as I write, in the Yellow Jersey.  Wellens is King.

They have moved from Alsace into the Vosges.  Stage 6 goes from Mullouse to La panche des belles filles, an uphill finish where stages have ended in the past.   One of the great things about the Tour coverage is the focus on landmarks along the way.  This morning, for example, they looked outside and inside a beautiful gothic church, the Collegiate Church of St-Thiebault.  Another they showed is a Cluniac priority founded by Peter the Venerable.

The finish of this stage, with its many climbs, is brutal.  It’s 160.5km and it has been extended an extra kilometer to wind even higher to the finish on a 24% grade.

The physics of the race is also interesting. A biker can consume around 7000 kcal on a day with lots of climbs.  That means that they have to be eating constantly, even during the race, not to mention hydration.  A sprinter like Sagan can generate some 1500 watts in a sprint.

Meanwhile, I’ve been thinking about one of my old bikes, stolen from the basement of St. Agnes rectory while I was away.  A Raleigh, Reynolds tubing, Campagnolo Super-Record parts.  It was a great bike.  May the thief, if unrepentant, be tormented by boils and may his hand grow from the ground out of his grave.

Anyway, the graphics during the TV coverage is spectacular, especially the maps.

Campagnolo… hmmm… I have one of those BIG Campy corkscrews in my storage area.  I should dig it out for use during the Tour.

UPDATE: That was agonizing to watch.    New wearer of the Maillot Jaune tonight and tomorrow, the Italian Ciccone.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
6 Comments

What the ‘c’atholic Left is up to on Twitter

Like the world, the flesh and devil, the catholic Left never sleeps. They are fierce users of social media. What are they up to today?

Here’s something from relentless self-promoter and catty provocateur, Beans. I’m blocked by Beans, btw.

This is simple nastiness.   Did Beans ever receive a formal mandatum to teach in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia?

A while back Francis gave a reliquary with bones of St. Peter to the Patriarch of Constantinople. Look how this Jesuit member of the New catholic Red Guard interprets the move. I’m blocked by Spadaro, btw. However, everyone can still access the site he personally runs in honor of infamous Italian homosexual writer Pier Vittorio Tondelli.

Did you get that? “Unfettered DISINVESTMENT” … “SYMBOLIC authority”. What the “its” refers to is puzzling, but I think we know what he is driving at.

And what about Jesuit homosexualist James Martin? I think I know the answer: “Render unto Caesar….”, or in other words, “Obey the law.”

We have to be aware of what these corrosive voices incessantly promote.

Posted in Liberals | Tagged , , ,
16 Comments

ASK FATHER: Should Catholic parents attend wedding of daughter outside the Church?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Father, should Catholic parents even attend the wedding of their Catholic daughter to a non-Baptized man outside the Church? Unitarian, to be exact.

The father is going to walk his daughter down the aisle, and Catholic family members will attend.

Advice, please for this prevalent situation in this day and age . . .

~ A distraught grandmother ~

Alas, I’ve answered this question many times on this blog.  It is a widespread problem.

I’ll leave aside the issue of dispensations, etc.

There is no “one size fits all” answer.  Every case must be considered according to its own circumstances.  Each family has its own set of dynamics.

While I think that it is possible to attend a shower and a reception in most cases, what about the wedding itself?   It depends.

Must depends on how parents and grandparents and godparents and extended family have lived their Catholic faith and provided a Catholic environment in which children matured.   Did they give their children the Faith?   No? And then are they shocked that they are not living the Faith they never got?

Another point.  Will staying away from the wedding do more harm than good in the relationship insofar as being able to have future influence is concerned?

Perhaps in some distant decade it was easier to form a more standardized answer.  Today, however, I don’t think it is wise or possible.

My advice is, whatever decision you make about attendance, find the best way to keep a strong line of communication open with the couple so that you can still have some influence.

  • Be kind, but be clear.
  • Always express joy about your Catholic Faith and demonstrate it in your own way of living.
  • Be inviting to them about Mass or devotions.
  • Never underestimate the power of an invitation.
  • Be prepared always to answer all manner of questions, concerning doctrine, practices or controversies.
  • Pray for them and offer mortifications for them.  Ask their Guardian Angels to guide them.

Best wishes.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
17 Comments

ASK FATHER: “Funeral Liturgy Outside Mass”

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Earlier this week, my wife attended what she thought would be a Funeral Mass for a Catholic relative, but was dismayed to find that it was merely a Liturgy of the Word service, followed by schmaltzy songs and a eulogy by a family member (who seemed to have some old scores to settle), all taking place inside the church.

I’d never heard of this kind of service before, but I subsequently
learned that it is called a “Funeral Liturgy Outside Mass”. It seems that this is primarily meant for occasions when it isn’t possible to celebrate Mass, but in this case the priest was present throughout and took part in the lunch afterwards.

My question is this: given that the CCC 1689 emphasizes the centrality of the Eucharist in Catholic funerals for the good of the soul of the departed and the community of the faithful, why is this type of liturgy allowed apart from cases of grave necessity? It disturbs me greatly that this appears to be a common practice, and that many of the faithful go to their rest without the benefit of a Mass.

GUEST PRIEST RESPONSE: Fr. Tim Ferguson

The law is clear in stating that a funeral Mass is the preferred prayer to offer on behalf of the deceased as well as for the spiritual edification and benefit of the mourners. The rite outside of Mass may be used when a funeral Mass is not permitted (i.e., on Holy Days of Obligation, during the Triduum, and on Sundays of Lent, Advent, and Easter), when a priest is not available, or when “for pastoral reasons the pastor and the family judge that the funeral liturgy outside Mass is a more suitable form of celebration.” (c.f. the Order of Christian Funerals, n. 178).

It’s hard to imagine those circumstances when, outside of those times listed, a priest who is available to offer a funeral Mass would opt not to do so. Perhaps if the deceased were a convert and there was some hostility among some family members to the deceased’s Catholic faith (but that would seem to me to be the perfect time to use the funeral liturgy as a means of evangelization!). Perhaps if the priest already had obligations to offer two Masses that day (presuming it was a ferial day) and could not licitly offer a third. Perhaps if the cineplex in town was offering a one-time only showing of Las Noches del Hombre Lobo with Paul Naschy as Count Waldemar Daninsky at 3:00 p.m., and in order to make it to the theatre on time to get a decent box of Raisinets and an RC Cola, a shorter liturgy would be preferable…

Even with the Funeral Liturgy Outside of Mass, there is no rubrical indication permitting eulogies, which are truly foreign to our funeral tradition, though sadly, in some places, they have become commonplace.

Certainly, having a Mass offered for the repose of one’s soul is a most salubrious thing. I would encourage our interlocutor, thus disturbed by the deceased person having been deprived of this benefit, to seek out a good and faithful priest and offer a stipend for a Mass to be said for the repose of his soul.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , ,
8 Comments

@Church_Militant on the public lynching of Fr. Eduard Perrone

Full disclosure. Fr. Eduard Perrone has been a friend for many years. I don’t believe a word of the allegations. BTW… Perrone famously blew the whistle on the disgusting goings-on at St. John’s Seminary.

Furthermore, last year at the Canon Law conference held at Our Lady’s Shrine in LaCrosse, WI, under the aegis of Card. Burke, we heard a presentation on how dioceses regularly violate the process and priests’ rights under law in cases of allegations. Damned scary stuff.

Michael Voris at Church Militant made a video about the accusations against Fr. Perrone. It is self-explanatory.

Posted in Clerical Sexual Abuse, The Coming Storm, The Drill | Tagged , ,
17 Comments

Really old frozen permafrost critters revived. What could possibly go wrong?

This is creepy. At National Post I see a story about some folks who revived a bunch of moss and microbes from hundreds of years ago that lay frozen under a glacier. Yeah… it’s growing. And they found wormy things, nematodes.

Yeah, they’re alive too.

My mind has immediately gone to that dark place shaped by reading lots of St. Augustine and dystopian fiction.

What could possibly go wrong?

[…]

Tatiana Vishnivetskaya has studied ancient microbes long enough to make the extreme feel routine. A microbiologist at the University of Tennessee, Vishnivetskaya drills deep into the Siberian permafrost to map the web of single-celled organisms that flourished ice ages ago. She has coaxed million-year-old bacteria back to life on a petri dish. They look “very similar to bacteria you can find in cold environments (today),” she said.

But last year, Vishnivetskaya’s team announced an “accidental finding” – one with a brain and nervous system – that shattered scientists’ understanding of extreme endurance.

[…]

Even her name is from a dystopian novel.

I really liked the part about…. “Oooops! Hey, look what we found! You know, it’s nearly impossible to kill this stuff.”

Meanwhile…

Tracer slipped the creased photo out of the taco-sauce stained manila envelope, feeling the weight inside of a thick, banded packs of Benjamins.

“Help us, Tracer Bullet. You’re our only hope.”

He signaled with three fingers to the guy in the wife-beater on the other side of what passed for the bar on the seedier edge of one of the seedier towns he ever seen. In front of him were three chipped shot glasses. Empty. Not empty for long.

Not full for long either.

The barkeep heaved himself in Tracer’s direction, uncorking the bottle and leaving it on the stained wood, etched with generations of knife-pointed initials and impossible suggestions.

“He’s gotta be here somewhere.”

At a university lab one of the grad-students bumped the wrong thing and probably got infected with a strain of an ancient super-bug revived in some worms found in permafrost somewhere. It was now a race. A few pencil-necks thought up the great idea of reviving stuff that had disappeared thousands of years ago and that, if it got out of the lab, it could kill, maybe 95% of human life.

“Maybe less,” she said over the phone. “We’ll know in a week or so when the symptoms manifest. You’ve gotta find him, Tracer. It’s gotta be you. Really, we can’t… tell anyone about this. There are … complications.”

He muttered to himself, filling the glasses with a continual crossing pour.

“Who thinks this **** up? Hey, look! Ancient worms that thousands of years under rock crushing ice can’t kill! Let’s wake ’em up and see what happens!”

“He’s gotta be here somewhere. Question is…. why did he run?”

For a moment he stared at the ribbons of liquid spreading out from the glassware, disappearing down into the cuts and cracks as it ran away.

 

Posted in You must be joking! | Tagged
14 Comments

Tour Talk – 2019 Tour de France

I am sure you already are deep into it, but for those of you who are behind the curve, the 2019 Tour de France is underway.

In my distant youth I did a little cycling, so I have a taste for this already.  A real draw for me each day, however, is the marvelous video coverage.  There are spectacular ground and aerial shots of the scenery.  The announcers and commentators are well prepped for the landmarks along the way, with good descriptions of the churches and chateaux, history and geography.

I record the coverage each day and skip commercials.  At certain points in the recording the commercials rather pile up so that toward they end they can run without them.

Today they cycled from Reims, with its amazing cathedral, to Nancy (213.5km – 132.7m).

So, anyone interested in some Tour Talk, chime in.

Team?  Individuals?   I rather like Team Astana because they are from Kazakhstan, as is one of my favorite bishops.  Ineos looks good also for “Say the Black, Do the Red” reasons.

BTW… that would be an officially Very Cool ham radio special event – transmit from the route of the Tour.

UPDATE:

Today there was a visit to Chateau Ruinart, 300 yr old producer of champagne.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged
14 Comments

The Church Militant and You

I had reason this morning to review what I might have written about our state in the Church in this earthly realm and I found this. It struck me as something that might be helpful, given what’s going on right now.

From 2015:


A note about the term Church Militant

paper-bagI post this because our dear Michael Sean Winters had a little nutty about my use of this term over at the Fishwrap (aka National Schismatic Reporter).

All of you Catholics who are reading this, even if you mostly identify with the dissenters at the Fishwrap, are members of the Church Militant, the Ecclesia Militans.

“Militant” is a scary word for libs (keep that paper bag handy) because it looks like the English word “military” (which must be a bad thing to belong to).

Militant comes from Latin milito, “to be a soldier, to perform military service”.  Note, “service”.

As a Catholic who is militans, “militant”that means that we dedicate ourselves with obedience and zeal to the role we are given in life through our calling and through our talents and good inclinations, our vocations in life.  It means that we are also prepared to fight the enemy wherever and whenever threats to the salvation of our own souls and our neighbor’s souls present themselves.  It means working together as units and not as individuals merely.   It means good conditioning and through drills in knowing well our Catholic Faith and practicing virtues and discipline in the use of the Sacraments.  It means submission to the Church’s teaching authority and her duly ordaining pastors.  It means fidelity, loyalty and even a willingness to die.

I now urge the Fishwrap types to have at hand a paper bag they can breathe into.

The Church Militant is made up of the living, we who are still on pilgrimage through this vale of tears, as the Salve Regina describes our earthly life.  The whole Church can be described as having three main kinds of membership, namely, those who are still alive here on Earth, those who are in an earthly sense dead but who live in Heaven (the Church Triumphant) and those who have died but who are, during their time of purification in Purgatory, awaiting their entrance into Heaven (the Church Suffering or Penitent).  These three are united, in one Holy Church, in a common “communion of saints”, even though we of the Church Militant often aren’t very saintly.

Church Militant is a common and traditional way to describe the living members of the Church.  For example, find it used as a hinge pin in the Catholic Encyclopedia.  Even though the Catechism of the Catholic Church 954 doesn’t explicitly use the terms Militant, Suffering and Triumphant, the concepts are clearly there when it describes the membership of the Church:

The three states of the Church. “When the Lord comes in glory, and all his angels with him, death will be no more and all things will be subject to him. But at the present time some of his disciples are pilgrims on earth. Others have died and are being purified, while still others are in glory, contemplating ‘in full light, God himself triune and one, exactly as he is”‘

That paragraph in the CCC quotes Lumen gentium 49; Mt 25:31 (which describes the separation of the blessed from the damned); 1 Cor 15:26-27 (which describes the ultimate triumph of God at the end of things); and the Council of Florence (1439) in DS 1305.  I will add that LG 43, on religious institutes, uses the phrase “militia Christi” to describe the support given by religious families to Church.

The old Catechism of St. Pius X uses the tripartite division, describing the Church Militant as the Church to which we actually belong.  Of course, you have to know that “actually” means “now”, and not loose English “really”.

In the Baltimore Catechism, in its explanation of the articles of the Creed, we find a great description

“The communion of saints:”

There are three parts in the Church. We have, first, the Church Militant, i.e., the fighting Church, made up of all the faithful upon earth, who are still fighting for their salvation. [The catholic Left, the Fishwrap types, are going to hate that description because of the implication that not everyone is saved (except for those meanies who don’t want to redistribute wealth or approve of sex with just about any carbon-based life form] The Holy Scripture tells us our life upon earth is a warfare. [Get that bag if you need it!  Then check 1 Tim 6:12: “Fight the good fight of the faith; take hold of the eternal life to which you were called when you made the good confession in the presence of many witnesses.”  Then check 2 Cor 10: 3-5: “For though we live in the world we are not carrying on a worldly war, for the weapons of our warfare are not worldly but have divine power to destroy strongholds. We destroy arguments and every proud obstacle to the knowledge of God, and take every thought captive to obey Christ.”  Yes.  We have enemies.] We have three enemies to fight. First, the devil, who by every means wishes to keep us out of Heaven-the place he once enjoyed himself The devil knows well the happiness of Heaven, and does not wish us to have what he cannot have himself; just as you sometimes see persons who, through their own fault, have lost their situation trying to keep others out of it. [The devil has earthly agents, even within the Church.  Think of, for example, the horrid example of priests who harm children and also writers in the catholic media who consistently deceive souls and undermine the faith and good discipline of the Church by promoting dissent.]

Our second enemy is the world. This does not mean the earth with all its beauty and riches, but the bad people in the world with their false doctrines; [See above.] some telling us there is no God, Heaven, or Hell, others that we should pay no attention to the teaching of the Church or the laws of God, and advising us by word and example to resist our lawful superiors in Church or State and give free indulgence to our sinful passions. [I have the impression that the catholic Left’s agenda is mainly focused on sex. When they perceive that something is a threat to their own desires, they attack it.  Of course they will attack any traditional expression of the Faith, because worship and doctrine are inextricably intertwined.]

The third enemy is our own flesh. [See above] By this we mean our concupiscence, that is, our passions, evil inclinations, and propensity to do wrong. When God first created man, the soul was always master over the body, and the body obedient to the soul. After Adam sinned, the body rebelled against the soul and tried to lead it into sin. The body is the part of our nature that makes us like the brute animals, while the soul makes us like to God and the angels.

When we sin, it is generally to satisfy the body craving for what it has not, or for that which is forbidden. Why did God leave this concupiscence in us? He left it, first, to keep us humble, by reminding us of our former sins, and, secondly, that we might overcome it and have a reward for the victory. [Yes, its a war and, as Christians, we are soldiers on the march.]

The Devil is not a myth, friends, and Hell is real.  We have to fight against the effects of Original Sin constantly.  We need to take seriously the admonition of Paul in Ephesians 6 to put on the whole armor of God.  Read this and then say we are not the Church Militant:

Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might. Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we are not contending against flesh and blood, but against the principalities, against the powers, against the world rulers of this present darkness, against the spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places. Therefore take the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having girded your loins with truth, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and having shod your feet with the equipment of the gospel of peace; besides all these, taking the shield of faith, with which you can quench all the flaming darts of the evil one. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God. Pray at all times in the Spirit, with all prayer and supplication. To that end keep alert with all perseverance, making supplication for all the saints.

Church Militant is a perfect description of who we are as Christians.

Think about this.  How do we fight again, say, temptations of the flesh or of other appetites?  We pursue the opposite.  If you are tempted to avarice, be generous.  If you are tempted to gluttony, fast.  If you are tempted to lie or gossip, hold your tongue and speak rarely.  Get it?  This is war.  We have to be good tacticians in every skirmish.

And another thing!  Who thinks that the “New Evangelization” is possible if we don’t also understand our roles in a Church that is also Militant?

The tripartite description of the Church doesn’t exclude other ways of describing our membership.  We aren’t either/or in this.  We can say that we are both the Church Militant and, say, the People of God, or even the Ecclesia Docens et Discens, the Teaching and the Learning Church, referring to the hierarchical teaching office and those who exercise it and those who are formed by the same.  We can use all sorts of ways to describe the Church, and, when they are balanced with each other, we have a far richer view of who we are and what we are called to.

However, leaving out one like Church Militant is, in light of the world, the flesh and the Devil, imprudent to the point of being either foolhardy or wicked or both.

So, if you are alive, and a Catholic, you are a member of the Church Militant, even if you are AWOL or a slacker or you are undermining your fellow members through dissent or vice.  If you are a one of those, by the way, God help you.  There’s hope for you while you are still drawing breath.  Once that breathing thing stops, however, it’ll be too late for you.  We can pray for you now, but we can never pray you out of Hell.  So, get yourselves squared away, especially through a good confession, and then do better.

By the way… Membership in the Ecclesia Militans… reason #1 for Summorum Pontificum.

Get out there and militate (i.e., be a good Catholic).


What spurred me into this?  A quote from Pius XII at the opening of the North American College in Rome in 1953.  We see its construction in the video I posted yesterday about the Holy Year of 1950.

We belong to the Church militant ; and she is militant because on earth the powers of darkness are ever restless to encompass her destruction. Not only in the far-off centuries of the early Church, but down through the ages and in this our day, the enemies of God and Christian civilization make bold to attack the Creator’s supreme dominion and sacrosanct human rights. No rank of the clergy is spared ; and the faithful—their number is legion—inspired by the valiant endurance of their shepherds and fathers in Christ, stand firm, ready to suffer and die, as the martyrs of old, for the one true Faith taught by Jesus Christ. Into that militia you seek to be admitted as leaders.”

– Pope Pius XII 14 October 1953, Inauguration of the North American College

I made some Z-Swag with most of that quote.  HERE

Posted in Be The Maquis, Classic Posts, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Linking Back, Semper Paratus, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
7 Comments

William F. Buckley and Fulton Sheen on Firing Line! 1970

This is great. William F. Buckley had Archbp Fulton Sheen on Firing Line in 1970.

I especially enjoyed Buckley’s comments about the National Catholic Reporter! (aka Fishwrap, aka National Schismatic Reporter) Listen at 34:30!

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged , ,
22 Comments