Canonist Ed Peters’ stern words about the dangers of anti-law mentality

Distinguished canonist Ed Peters has something to say about canon law and the disasters that follow when a spirit of antinomianism ticks up.  HERE  My emphases and comments.

Canon law has never been ‘the frame of reference’ for the Church

When prelates of the erudition and experience of a Donald Cdl. Wuerl (Washington DC) can say things like this, the rest of us can be in no doubt as to just how deeply and widely a fundamental misunderstanding of law in the Catholic Church has taken hold. Speaking about the future of the Church, Wuerl, who is recognized as one of Pope Francis’ most esteemed advisors, said that, in the wake of the 2015 Synod and the Francis’ papacy, “The frame of reference now is no longer the Code of Canon Law. The frame of reference is now going to be, ‘What does the Gospel really say here?’”

I hardly know where to start, but here goes. [Here goes indeed!]

The “frame of reference” for the mission of the Catholic Church has never, ever been the Code of Canon Law, and no canon lawyer I know of has ever, ever claimed otherwise. The “frame of reference” for the Catholic Church has always been, and has only been, Christ the Lord. [Iustus Iudex] For the cardinal archbishop of a major Western capital to talk as if the Code of Canon Law, for so much as one second, ever fancied itself as the “frame of reference” for the Catholic Church—well, it confirms the stranglehold that antinomian attitudes have secured over ecclesiastical thought in the space of one lifetime, to the point that today, many in the highest circles of ecclesiastical leadership can scarcely even talk about canon law without caricaturing it. [Amen.] But if Wuerl avoids offering some of the more insulting depictions of canon law and canon lawyers being tossed around recently, he nevertheless sees canon law largely as an obstacle to the saving truths proclaimed by Jesus and he gives urbane cover to others who find certain Gospel truths, as enunciated in concise legal terminology, too inconvenient.

Twice, maybe three times, in her history, the Catholic Church has suffered though waves of antinomianism. Each time, of course, law—as natural to human society as a skeleton is to the human body—eventually regained its place in ecclesial life, but only after much needless waste. Our current wave of disdain for canon law started in the early 1960s, it grew enormously throughout that decade and into the 1970s (fed in part by the disastrously long period that the Church went effectively without canon law and aggravated by similar anti-order shocks to civil society), it seemed to recede a bit in the 1980s and 1990s, only to erupt again in the wake of the clergy sex abuse disasters ten or fifteen years ago. Today, whether because Francis actually dislikes canon law or because he is simply uninterested in it, the aging antinomians of the 1960s and 1970s see an opening to resume their attacks on law and lawyers in the Church, and they are seizing that opportunity. [Nowadays, if you want to uphold the Truth – which means also upholding laws that reflect the Truth – you will be labelled (libeled) as being against “mercy”.]

I am not going to use a blog post to try to educate antinomians (whether they are “hard core” canon law haters, or, as I rather think Wuerl to be, gentler “Amator Si, Legislator No” types) as to the many and vital connections between Catholic doctrine and canon law, though I have raised such issues several times, say, here and here. Rather, I’ll just say this: canon law has always seen itself in service to the Church, huge tracts of canon law rest directly on biblical foundations and doctrinal assertions made by the Magisterium over the centuries, canon law is always in need of reform (just ask any canon lawyer), and finally, that some people railing against canon law need to ask themselves whether it is law they don’t like, or the truths such laws defend. [Do I hear an “Amen!”?]

Fr. Z kudos for the sober description of the problem.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Olympian Middle | Tagged ,
18 Comments

2 Nov ALL SOULS plans, INDULGENCES, and YOU!

In Madison, WI Bp. Morlino will offer a Pontifical Requiem Mass at the Throne at 7 PM at the Bishop O’Connor Center. The music will be De Victoria’s Requiem for 4 Voices.  I’ll bet there aren’t any other Requiems at the Throne being done.

I received a note that at wonderful St. John Cantius (what would Chicagoans and so many others do without them?) the Mozart Requiem will be used for a Pontifical Requiem at the faldstool with the great Bp. Perry.

MOZART REQUIEM MASS
  • Event: Mozart Requiem Mass for All Souls Day
  • DateMon., Nov. 2
  • Time: 730 pm Latin High Mass with Bishop Joseph Perry
  • Location: St. John Cantius Church, 825 N Carpenter, Chicago IL 60642
  • Directions/Public Transportationclick here
  • Help Sponsor the Music: Click here for our sponsorship form.
  • Parking: Free parking behind church and by the school
  • Website: HERE

At Holy Innocents in Manhattan… On Monday, November 2nd, 2015 is the Commemoration of All the Faithful Departed (All Souls’ Day). Holy Innocents will have a Solemn Requiem Mass followed by the Rite of Absolution at 6:00 PM.

I see that the website of Ss. Trinità in Rome hasn’t been updated since Last ventsaster.  (Bravo, guys.)   Still, I know they will be doing something grand.  Here is a shot of their catafalque from a couple years ago.

Now… Indulgences and YOU!

From the Handbook of Indulgences

Visiting a Church or an Oratory on All Souls Day

A plenary (“full”) indulgence, which is applicable only to the souls in Purgatory is granted to the Christian faithful who devoutly visit a church or an oratory on (November 2nd,) All Souls Day.

Will you not, for love, try to gain these indulgences?  Make a plan.

Requirements for Obtaining a Plenary Indulgence on All Souls Day (2 Nov)

  • Visit a church and pray for souls in Purgatory
  • Say one “Our Father” and the “Apostles Creed” in the visit to the church
  • Say one “Our Father” and one “Hail Mary” for the Holy Father’s intentions (that is, the intentions designated by the Holy Father each month)
  • Worthily receive Holy Communion (ideally on the same day if you can get to Mass)
  • Make a sacramental confession within 20 days of All Souls Day
  • For a plenary indulgence be  free from all attachment to sin, even venial sin (otherwise, the indulgence is partial, not plenary, “full”).

You can acquire one plenary indulgence a day.

A partial indulgence can be obtained by visiting a cemetery and praying for the departed.  You can gain a plenary indulgence visiting a cemetery each day between 1 November and 8 November. These indulgences are applicable only to the Souls in Purgatory.

A plenary indulgence, applicable only the Souls in Purgatory, is also granted when you visit a church or a public oratory on 2 November. While visiting the church or oratory say one Our Father and the Apostles Creed.

A partial indulgence, applicable only to the Souls in Purgatory, can be obtained when saying the “Eternal rest … Requiem aeternam…” prayer.

Do you know this prayer?

Requiem aeternam dona ei [pl.eis], Domine, et lux perpetua luceat ei [eis]. Requiescat [-ant] in pace Amen.Eternal rest grant to them, O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon them. May the souls of the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen.

It is customary to add the second half of the “Eternal Rest” prayer after the prayer recited at the conclusion of a meal.

Gratias agimus tibi, omnipotens Deus, pro universis beneficiis tuis, qui vivis et regnas in saecula saeculorum.

Fidelium animae, per misericordiam Dei, requiescant in pace. Amen.

We give Thee thanks, almighty God, for all Thy benefits, Who livest and reignest, world without end.

May the souls of the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen.

My friend Fr. Finigan has a good explanation of being detached from sin and the disposition you need to gain indulgences.  HERE

Keep in mind that having high standards is a good thing.

Shouldn’t we be free from attachment to sin?  To what degree is being attached to sin okay?

In the final analysis, perhaps we have to admit that gaining plenary indulgences is rarer than we would like.

That said, it is not impossible to gain them.

I don’t think we have to be a hermit living on top of a tree beating his head with a rock to be free of attachment to sin so as to gain this plenary or “full” indulgence.

Also, we do not know the degree to which a “partial” indulgence is “partial”.  It could be a lot.  That in itself is something which should spur us on!

Generally, if someone is motivated to obtain an indulgence, he does so from true piety, desire to please God and to help oneself and others.

When it comes to complete detachment from sin, even venial, few of us live in that state all the time.

Nevertheless, there are times when we have been moved to sorrow for sin after examination of conscience, perhaps after an encounter with God as mystery in liturgical worship or in the presence of human suffering, that we come to a present horror and shame of sin that moves us to reject sin entirely.  That doesn’t mean that we, in some Pelagian sense, have chosen to remain perfect from that point on or that by force of will we can chosen never to sin again.  God is helping us with graces at that point, of course.  But we do remain frail and weak.

But God reads our hearts.

Holy Church offers us many opportunities for indulgences.  The presupposition is that Holy Church knows we can actually attain them.

They can be partial (and we don’t know to what extent that is) and full or plenary.  But they can be obtained by the faithful.

Holy Church is a good mother.  She wouldn’t dangle before our eyes something that is impossible for us to attain.

That doesn’t mean that a full indulgence is an easy thing.  It does mean that we can do it.  In fact, beatifications and canonizations have been more common in the last few decades and in previous centuries.  The Church is showing us that it is possible for ordinary people to live a life of heroic virtue.

Therefore, keep your eyes fixed on the prize of indulgences.   Never think that it is useless to try to get any indulgence, partial or full, just because

Perhaps you are not sure you can attain complete detachment from all sin, even venial.  Before you perform the indulgenced work, ask God explicitly to take away any affection for sin you might be treasuring.  Do this often and, over your lifetime, and you may find it easier and easier. Support your good project with good confessions and good communions.  You need those graces.

A person does not become expert in worldly pursuits overnight or without effort.  Why would not the same apply to spiritual pursuits? It takes time and practice to develop skills and virtues.  It takes time to develop habits of the spirit as well.

We can do this.  And when we fall short, we still have the joy of obtaining the partial indulgence and that’s not nothing.

Posted in Events, Four Last Things, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
19 Comments

CQ CQ CQ #HamRadio Saturday – Roman Projects

ham radio maximilian kolbe sp3rn1

St. Maximilian Kolbe
SP3RN

Because I was travelling, I was not on air much.  I did make a contact via Echolink with Father KD8ZFF.

I made a non-radio contact with Father F5SNJ in Rome, Fr. William Barker, FSSP.  We are working on a couple projects.  We would like to organize a couple special events for the Year of Mercy that would involve the activation of the call signs of the Sovereign Military Order of the Knights of Malta (SMOM) which is 1A0C (or a special event call, perhaps) and of the Vatican itself, HV___.

We met with highly placed figures in the SMOM and in the Vatican City State (SCV).

Here is a shot of the palace of the administrative offices for the SCV.

Looking the other direction from the steps.

We ran into two serious hard walls in our venture.  But there are now chips in those walls.

And Fr. Barker and I had a couple good meals over it.

My plotting and scheming is not yet over.

I am also plotting on a local level to get a serious station set up.  More on that later.

Lastly, my call sign may change in the next couple days.

MEANWHILE… you hams out there… check out…

If you are not on the list and you want to be, drop me a line or post a comment, below.

73 – KC9ZJN

Posted in Ham Radio | Tagged , ,
3 Comments

Pope Francis and a Post-Synodal Exhortation

At the National Catholic Register, Edward Pentin has the story about the “leaked” news via the Secretary of State Card. Parolin.

Apparently Pope Francis will in fact issue a Post-Synodal Exhortation fairly soon. It was said at one point that Francis was not going to issue one.

There are other points, too. So, check out Pentin’s post.

Posted in Synod | Tagged ,
6 Comments

VIDEO Ross Douthat on the Crisis of Conservative Catholicism

Ross Douthat is now the target of snark by liberal catholics even though he writes for Hell’s Bible (aka New York Times).

Ross recently gave a talk at Erasmus Address gathering sponsored by First Things.  It is a must view talk. You might not agree with everything he offers, but he gives a good 10000 foot view of the issues and he is a pleasure to listen to. Good sense of humor too.

The Crisis of Conservative Catholicism featuring Ross Douthat from First Things on Vimeo.

Say a prayer for Ross, who is recovering from horrible Lyme’s Disease.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
13 Comments

ASK FATHER: What does “attachment to sin” mean?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Please forgive me for being obtuse but what does being free from “attachment” to sin actually mean? I so want to relieve as many Holy Souls as possible in the coming month. Thank you

Jesus says in Matthew’s Gospel, “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” (Mt. 5:48). That’s a pretty high standard. An equally high standard is what the Church puts before us in our theology of indulgences. We can only gain a plenary indulgence when we are free of attachment to sin.

Being “perfect”, and being “free of attachment to sin”, seem impossible.  But we know with great confidence that, with God, all things are possible (Matthew 19:26). Our Lord and His Church do not dangle before our eyes things that are impossible for us to attain. Therefore, “perfection”, and “freedom from attachment to sin” are possible to attain.  More here.

How does freedom from attachment to sin look like?

Let’s look at its opposite: attachment to sin.

Millicent has an ongoing struggle with the sins of gossip, envy, jealousy, and pride. She is self-aware enough to know these are sins. She does a thorough examination of conscience every two weeks before she goes to confession. She confesses her sins with sincerity and humility. She is truly sorry, and her sins are forgiven. She knows she should change her pattern of behavior.  But, she’s afraid that doing so might cause her to lose some friends. Like St. Paul, she wonders, “Why do I do what I do not want to do?” (Romans 7:15). Millicent, a good woman, is still attached to her sins, even though she’s doing the right thing and regularly confessing them.  In a secret place she doesn’t like to look into she still enjoys the sin, or rather the benefits of the sin and, in sense, that enjoyment, or attachment, is a flaw in her love for God and in her gratitude for His saving gifts.

In order for Millicent to be disposed to receive a plenary indulgence, she must do some hard work to cooperate with God’s grace. Breaking habits of sin is hard work.  We have, by the way, armies of saints and angels and the Good Lord Himself are ready to help.

Remember that indulgences are either for the remission of all temporal punishment (penance and purification required) due to sin or part of that punishment.  They are full (plenary) or partial.  If we try to gain an plenary indulgence and – this is important – we are not free of attachment to sin – we still can gain a partial indulgence for that work.

That’s not nothing!

So… how to get rid of attachment to sin.

For Millicent, getting free of her attachments to gossip might mean giving up some friendships, as well as avoiding situations that lead to sin (“near occasions of sin”).  It will involve praying to her Guardian Angel each and every time she goes into a conversation asking for help to avoid gossip. She might have to go to confession weekly instead of bi-weekly.  She must be willing to suffer losses.  She must learn to say no to her impulses.

She will then have more and more moments when she doesn’t hate the sins just enough.  She won’t harbor a tacit enjoyment.

Mind you… we are all poor sinners.  Also, the Enemy is really good at planting suggestions and leading us to think and feel wicked things.  Attachment or freedom will ebb and flow.   BUT… we can consciously pursue freedom from attachments to sin and, slowly but surely, get better at it.

What Holy Church asks, in your obtaining an indulgence, is that you are doing your best to love God and neighbor and to hate sin.  That’s it.  At the moment you are seeking the indulgence, try with all your mind and heart to see your sins for what they are and then sincerely to place them aside.  That’s what the Church is asking.  Doing this again and again and again, with acts of will and lot’s of requests for grace, will make it easier and the angels and saints will rejoice over you.

So, because Holy Church wants us to gain indulgences, try to gain them even if you’re not certain that you’re free from all attachment to sin.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity |
9 Comments

Rome – Last Day: Candles and Apostolic Tombs

Yesterday I met a friend who is beginning a new business for vestments and clerical garb.

This is the sort of thing he is able to produce at a fraction of the cost of Roman shops.

Interesting no?  Wouldn’t it be great to have access to vestments like this without mortgaging the diocese?


Just a sight in the street.   I have a special affection for the old “No Littering” signs.  One young fellow who saw me taking the photo told me that there is a blog for these!  Who knew?


I had appointments in the Vatican City State on Wednesday.  Thus I stopped at my old office.   Here’s a shot of my old window (from the outside obviously).   No, it isn’t a prison cell.  However, people would stop and talk to me through the bars.


Then to the Governatorato.  More about that in my CQ Saturday post.

Since I was passing the Basilica I ducked in through the side door under the monument of Alexander VII to visit the tomb of Sts Simon and Jude, whose feast it was (28 October).

Then back out the same way and off to lunch.

“alla Norcina”!

A trip to Rome is not complete without prayer at the tomb of Rome’s co-patron, St Philip Neri.

In the Chiesa Nuova… what’s wrong with this picture.

Back to the Vatican for an appointment with the Swiss Guard for whom we had the special breastplate made.   I’ll have a separate post on that.  Meanwhile…


A taste …

Finally an interesting photo of yours truly saying the evening Mass not yesterday but the day before.  As it happened the electricity was completely out.

Thanks to passioxp.com for the shot!

So, I am now back in these USA.

I am very grateful to all of you who helped me on this trip.

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to |
Comments Off on Rome – Last Day: Candles and Apostolic Tombs

Synod thoughts and thanks to readers

First, I am deeply grateful for the donations that have come in to defray the cost of my travel to Rome.  Some have been widow’s mites, some have been hefty, all have been warmly appreciated.   Since I have been on the run a lot during my time here, I haven’t had much of a chance to write all the individual thank you notes that I customarily send out.  I also haven’t updated the “thermometers”.  I will do more when I slow down.  That said, I will again say Mass for the intention of my benefactors for this trip tonight at Ss. Trinita probably between 6-7 Rome time CET (1200-1300 CDT).  UPDATE:  I had a call from the priest at Ss. Trinità who asked me to take the parish evening Mass at 6:30. I may have to take their intention for the Mass. But I still have tomorrow and my last day!   UPDATE: I was able to use my own intention!  So you got prayed for again.

Now to business.

Since I have a few really smart people writing to me about the Synod and its aftermath, I’ll share some of their points with you.  I can’t do much better than they are doing, frankly.

Here… much edited and cut… from a friend:

There is no keeping Cardinal George Pell quiet. He gave an extraordinary interview to Edward Pentin at the National Catholic REGISTER in which he builds upon his earlier, surprising comment (which I sent to you yesterday) to the effect that the Synod Final Document was better than a lot of us are thinking.  HERE

READ THIS CAREFULLY. Pentin asks the right questions, in the right order. Pell answers in Anglo-Saxon clarity but there are points beyond which he will not go and will not be drawn. Pell’s responses are carefully crafted. Whatever you think about his reasoning, this is a reasoned set of arguments. Remember, too, that Pell was there and that he showed outstanding courage in initiating and continually defending the 13 Cardinals’ Letter.

Some of you have already seen this op-ed piece by Ross Douthat. I didn’t see it until it was sent to me because I don’t dumpster-dive in the New York Times.  HERE

But Douthat would be incomplete without this repartee in the combox over at Andrea Gagliarducci’s blog MondayVatican.  HERE

In the combox an anonymous comment appeared that challenged Ducci for “special pleading” on behalf of Pope Francis, i.e., for trying to defend the Pope against the charge that he really is batting for the other side; that he is a Kasperite and worse….

Gagliarducci responds. I am not going to say that I agree with Gagliarducci; I don’t. But the matter is too important not to be careful and then careful again. So read Gagliarduccis explanation of why he refuses (so far) to conclude that the Pope is really with the Kasperites, and make up your own mind. But compare Gagliarducci’s arguments with Douthat’s. 

ONE MORE THING. I have been wondering for a couple weeks whether those of us who think in Anglo-Saxon terms don’t see matters in Rome in too black-and-white a set of terms. Gagliarducci calls us Manicheans and says we (Americans, British, Australians) lack subtlety in our judgments. While that may be true, we tend to win wars and not run away from them as the Italians do. But I raise the point again because I am struck at how very different American/British commentary on the Synod is from European.

Here’s the repartee at MondayVatican I am talking about:

Anonimo scrive:

26 ottobre 2015 alle 03:21

Thank you for your thoughtful analysis. However, whenever I read your articles, I am always left with one unanswered question: why do you always suggest, without any evidence whatsoever, that the adapters that placed the Pope in office, and that he has appointed to high positions, and that he has surrounded himself with, are not expressions of the Pope’s mind? The Pope is basically elected by them; the Pope makes them his closest advisers; the Pope appoints them to draft and control important documents; the Pope appoints them to the Synod when bishops’ conferences did not; they claim to speak the Pope’s mind, and he never contradicts them; the Pope severely criticizes the opponents of the adapters, likening them to men with hardened hearts, not alive with the Gospel. The Pope, against the numerical will of the majority of bishops does not clearly close the issues at variance with the adapters. Is it not a logical conclusion to draw to say that the Pope is in fact their man, and that they are the Pope’s men? Why do you refuse to draw the obvious conclusion? Perhaps you know something we do not. If so, you have never said it. 

RISPONDI

Andrea Gagliarducci scrive:

26 ottobre 2015 alle 09:04

Dearest,

thanks for your comment. For what I see, the Pope is mostly an old fashioned, even conservative man in terms of doctrine. There is always something that does not match between what he says and the people he is surrounded with. So I highlight the contradiction. When he speaks about openness and smell of the sheep and everything else, I always find him vague, certainly not on the adpaters side. On the other hand, the Pope showed appreciation for Caffarra during the last Synod, he did not demote Card. Bagnasco as Italian Bishops Conference president, he has a good relation with Cardinal Mueller, even though the Cardinal knows how to criticize him (but Cardinal Mueller has also a deep knowledge of Latin America). So, in the end, I have that sort of feeling that behind any populism, behind any moment the Pope expresses in a vague way thus grabbing the progressives attention and secular media headlines, the Pope have a sort of debt with the adapters who in fact campaigned for him. Because otherwise his thought or his way of doing is not what we can call a straight line, and it is often inexplicable. However, it can also be that the Pope does not follow a rationale. But I think that only time will tell.

Also, I think I predicted that a media onslaught would begin against certain figures who were perceived to have resisted the Kasperites.   Today I received this SMS:

New scandal book by Gianluigi Nuzzi purports to quote “gay Cardinal” with new revelations Vatileaks style.

Whatever this is about, it can’t be good for anyone.

Posted in Synod, The Drill | Tagged
28 Comments

Thoughts on the Synod: Saruman v. Ents, Orcs v. Fangorn

I am receiving one cri de coeur after another.

Lots of people are confused and angry and sad about what they are hearing.  Instead of firm foundations from bishops, we got sand.   Yes, can can make cement with sand, but right now it is nothing but sand.  Still, we have choices to make.  Leave it be sand or make cement?

Thus, I have received comments and notes such as this:

Well, how about that. Those of us who have lived and, according to Church teaching, in frater-soror partnerships, until the good Lord saw fit to resolve our situations Himself have been what the English call right mugs, haven’t we? Oh, I suppose the ban on communion in remarriage after divorce, that was right five minutes ago but it’s going to be wrong now? Or perhaps Our Lord was only joking, yes that must be it, ho ho ho, what fools we have been!

Sorry, Father.Sorry, Father.

No need for “sorry”!

That’s exactly the sort of thing that I am hearing from a lot of people right now.

Time and again in recently history faithful priests felt kicked in the teeth for preaching Catholic doctrine.  Day after day for a while there they were called every name in the book.  They were labelled as rigid and doctrinaire, without compassion.

Now, faithful lay Catholics, suffering in certain ways related to their relationships, also feel kicked in the teeth.

The cumulative effect is that people – including priests – start to doubt why the hell we have been fighting for all this time?

Friend, I understand your frustration. But… we must persevere!

Here is another note I received:

Please notice how parents just got thrown under the bus:

“it is therefore necessary to discern which forms of exclusion that are currently in practice in the areas of liturgical, pastoral, educative, and official responsibilities can be eliminated. ”

So, if I expect my kids will be taught by Catholic school teachers and parish catechists who are NOT in a public state of mortal sin, I’m out of luck? Maybe not – my own bishop is quite solid. But it sure looks like this passage means public adulterers ought not be excluded from teaching the Faith or in Catholic schools. Like that’s really going to strengthen our identity and effectiveness….

The members of the Synod could have made clear statements that, in themselves, would also encourage the Catholic faithful in addition to advise the Holy Father about what he might address in his own document.

They could have.   They didn’t.

It is true that the document “could have been worse”.   62 people survived the Hindenburg, too.  So, it was not as bad as it could have been.

What I want all of you to do now is… calm the heck down.

I have in mind a scene from the written version, real book The Lord of the Rings, not the wussified movie from the people who really didn’t get the book at all.

Sound and fury surrounded this Synod, much like the hurricane of violence unleashed by the Ents on Isengard.  Lay people and clergy with them did manage to stop the Kasperites.  It is interesting that the German newspapers say this was a defeat.  That’s enough for me.  Anyway.  There is this vast tumult surrounding Isengard and then, suddenly, it stops.  Bam.  Silence.  And from the tower comes the single little laugh of Saurman who really doesn’t know what sort of deep doodoo he is really in.

The hobbits recount the destruction of Isengard…

‘As soon as Saruman had sent off all his army, our turn came. Treebeard… went up to the gates, and began hammering on the doors, and calling for Saruman. There was no answer, except arrows and stones from the walls. But arrows are no use against Ents. They hurt them, of course, and infuriate them: like stinging flies….

‘When Treebeard had got a few arrows in him, he began… to get positively “hasty”, as he would say. He let out a great hoom-hom, and a dozen more Ents came striding up. An angry Ent is terrifying. Their fingers, and their toes, just freeze on to rock; and they tear it up like bread-crust. It was like watching the work of great tree-roots in a hundred years, all packed into a few moments.

‘They pushed, pulled, tore, shook, and hammered; and… in five minutes they had these huge gates just lying in ruin; and some were already beginning to eat into the walls…. I don’t know what Saruman thought was happening; but anyway he did not know how to deal with it.’….

‘He seems at one time to have got round them, but never again. And anyway he did not understand them; and he made the great mistake of leaving them out of his calculations. He had no plan for them, and there was no time to make any…. As soon as our attack began, the few remaining rats in Isengard started bolting through every hole that the Ents made. The Ents let the Men go, after they had questioned them, two or three dozen only down at this end. I don’t think many orc-folk, of any size, escaped. Not from the Huorns: there was a wood full of them all round Isengard by that time….

‘When the Ents had reduced a large part of the southern walls to rubbish… Saruman fled in a panic….

‘When Saruman was safe back in Orthanc, it was not long before he set some of his precious machinery to work. By that time there were many Ents inside Isengard… they were roaming about and doing a great deal of damage. Suddenly up came fires and foul fumes: the vents and shafts all over the plain began to spout and belch. Several of the Ents got scorched and blistered. One of them, Beechbone I think he was called, a very tall handsome Ent, got caught in a spray of some liquid fire and burned like a torch: a horrible sight.

That sent them mad. I thought that they had been really roused before; but I was wrong…. It was staggering. They roared and boomed and trumpeted, until stones began to crack and fall at the mere noise of them…. Round and round the rock of Orthanc the Ents went… storming like a howling gale, breaking pillars, hurling avalanches of boulders down the shafts, tossing up huge slabs of stone into the air like leaves…. I saw iron posts and blocks of masonry go rocketing up hundreds of feet, and smash against the windows of Orthanc. But Treebeard kept his head. He had not had any burns, luckily. He did not want his folk to hurt themselves in their fury, and he did not want Saruman to escape out of some hole in the confusion. Many of the Ents were hurling themselves against the Orthanc-rock; but that defeated them…. [They] could not get a grip on it, or make a crack in it; and they were bruising and wounding themselves against it. So Treebeard went out into the ring and shouted. His enormous voice rose above all the din. There was a dead silence, suddenly. In it we heard a shrill laugh from a high window in the tower. That had a queer effect on the Ents. They had been boiling over; now they became cold, grim as ice, and quiet. They left the plain and gathered round Treebeard, standing quite still. He spoke to them for a little in their own language; I think he was telling them of a plan he had made in his old head long before. Then they just faded silently away in the grey light. Day was dawning….

‘They set a watch on the tower… but the watchers were so well hidden in shadows and kept so still, that I could not see them. The others went away north.’

My friends, you are the Ents and the trees of Fangorn which went to Orthanc and to Helm’s Deep. When you band together and get into action you can do anything and the Enemy had better flee.

Be cool. Be watchful. None of this is over.

They are not going to win.  They have not seen your true strength yet.

We are now playing the long game.  We outnumber them.  We will not quit.  We will prevail.

It does out side no good to freak out and do things that will both help the enemy and weaken our identity.

Stay frosty.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, Be The Maquis, Cri de Coeur, Semper Paratus, Si vis pacem para bellum!, Synod, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
62 Comments

Fr. Z asks tech advice

I have always had a hard time getting movies/videos from my iPhone to my WordPress blog (this blog) and, therefore, I don’t post many or any.  Too bad!  I see some cool stuff.

I have one on my phone that I definitely want to post.

Any pointers from others?  I find iPhone and Mac super clunky for this sort of thing.  The video is mv4 and largish, to big to go straight through the WordPress app.  I have to compress or shrink the video and post it in a format that you can play.

Any ideas would be well received.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes |
23 Comments