ASK FATHER: Communion twice in a day. But is Communion under both species already twice?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I have a question about the number of times Holy Communion May be received in a day. And I know the answer sort of.

The question is, if you may receive twice in the same day within the context of Holy Mass. and if you completely receive The body Blood Soul and divinity of Christ in either spiecies. Are you receiving twice if you receive under both species? If you were to go to Mass twice and receive under both species at both Masses would you be receiving 4 times?

First, let’s review.

The 1983 Code of Canon Law says:

Can. 917 – Qui sanctissimam Eucharistiam iam recepit, potest eam iterum eadem die suscipere solummodo intra eucharisticam celebrationem cui participat, salvo praescripto Can. 921, § 2.

Someone who has already received the Most Holy Eucharist can receive it again (iterum) on the same day only within the Eucharistic celebration [i.e. Mass, not a Communion service] in which the person participates, with due regard for the prescription of can. 921 § 2.

That iterum does not mean “again and again”, but merely “again, one more time”.

Can. 921 § 2 says that if a person is in danger of death, he may receive Communion even it is not in the context of Mass. That is Viaticum.

Also, that “Eucharistic celebration” in the canon does not mean just any service involving Communion. It means Mass. That was cleared up by the Holy See in an official response to a dubium, an officially proposed question.

To your question about receiving under both kinds.  Is reception of Holy Communion under both kinds in two different steps, first as the Host and then, going to the chalice the Precious Blood, two separate acts of receiving Communion?  This wouldn’t be a question in the case of intinction, or how It is distributed in an Eastern Divine Liturgy, but it might be if the Hosts and the chalice are separated at any distance.

Yes, and no.

Clearly, it is physically two separate actions of reception.  Right?  First you receive here, then you go over there, etc.  That looks like two receptions.  Right?

However, morally it is one act of reception of Communion.  You are in the same Mass, during the same Communion rite, receiving the same Eucharistic Lord, both species consecrated at that Mass etc., even though you had to “go over there” to receiving the Precious Blood.

Or maybe you received the Precious Blood first and then went to where the Hosts were distributed? What difference does it make?

Look at it this way.  If you eat a steak by cutting it into small pieces, you are not eating dozens of tiny steaks, you are eating “a steak”.  If you eat a part of a steak and then put the rest in the fridge and eat the rest later you might be able to say that you had two steak meals not one, even though it started out as the one steak.  You get two meals in the day.  Analogies limp, but it is something like that.  And, for the obtuse out there, I am not reducing the Eucharist to a meal… even though, yes, it is also that.

So, reception under both kinds in one Mass is one reception of Communion.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Canon Law, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
6 Comments

ASK FATHER: Catholic betrothal rite, ceremony

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Have you ever heard of “betrothal ceremonies” in the Roman Rite prior to entering into marriage? Asking for a friend…

Once upon a time the notion of “betrothal” was far more rooted in both secular and religious consciousness (often not separable).    In the West, betrothal certainly goes back to the Jewish two-fold betrothal – which itself establish a legal joining – and marriage.

Betrothal was so serious that breaking betrothal was a breach of promise which could result in a financial penalty beyond the return of the dowries.

In the Catholic Church, betrothals were considered binding.  In the time leading up to the actual marriage ceremony, the fact of the betrothal would be publicly announced in the reading of “banns” from the pulpits of parish churches and posted in a document near the doors of the church.

There is no prescribed rite for betrothal.  However, there is one available through Angelus Press, which is going to be pretty “traditional”, if that is what you are looking for.

The process of courtship and betrothal and marriage was a serious and carefully observed custom.   From the movies, think about the scenes from The Quiet Man with the great John Wayne (bless him, probably St. John Wayne given the way he died) and Maureen O’Hara. (US HERE – UK HERE)  In The Godfather, Michael is interested in a girl in the village.  He very formally asked the father permission to see the daughter, there is a huge lunch with all the family, and they go for a walk… with all the women following right behind (… followed by guards ironically carrying una lupara).

We should keep in mind that these rituals formed marriage and society long before the mania of “romantic love”.  Families would agree to form bonds and marriage were part of the glue.  There were practical reasons to marry, as well as the “romantic”.  It worked.  These practices remind us of a few salutary things.

First, love is a choice, an act of will.  You choose love.  That forms a basis far more secure than ooey gooey eye gazing of luhv.

Second, marriage is a foundational building block of society.  We have to know who people are and how we are related.  It is not merely a private matter, it is public.

Third, God made marriage.  We don’t have a right to twist it out of recognition.  We hurt ourselves and society by doing so.

I would like to see more betrothal ceremonies.  Even more, we need a lot more preaching about the purpose of dating, of courtship and then of love, which is charity.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
14 Comments

BOOKS RECEIVED: Two VERY different DAUGHTERS!

Some of you long time readers may recall that I’ve been a character in a sci-fi series. I was even killed… at least once. If that isn’t a motivation to read them, I don’t know what is.

I became a ongoing character in Chris Kennedy‘s zany series after he reached out to people to sign up to be “Red Shirts” in his books: basically cannon fodder whom he would name but then shamelessly kill off, just as the “Red Shirts” in Star Trek seem not to last beyond the 4th minute of the first segment.  I told him, “I can’t be a Red Shirt, but I can be a BLACK Shirt!”  He took me up on it.  Subsequently, I have some great lines and I get to kill really evil aliens.  Sure, I die… at least once.   But I’m not dead, yet.

At any rate, I’ve been exchanging emails with the author of those rollicking fun books about our mutual writing projects and disciplines. In solidarity, I should give him a shout for a new book and series he is working on. I haven’t read it yet.

The Mutineer’s Daughter (In Revolution Born Book 1) US HERE – UK HERE

NB: I’m not in that one, btw.  Frankly, I don’t have a clue.  However, Chris is an upstanding guy, an officer and a gentleman.   I don’t think he would clue me in on something that I couldn’t share.   That said, Kennedy’s books are fun.  They aren’t Heinlein.  They aren’t Azimoz.  They are more like… The Magificent Seven meet Star Gate.

Also, on an entirely different tack, one of you readers sent me a copy of a new book The Radiance of Her Face: A Triptych in Honor of Mary Immaculate by Dom Xavier Perrin. US HERE – UK HERE

Mary is, of course, as Il Poeta calls her “the daughter of her Son”.

This little 2006 book was originally in French.  The writers is a Benedictine monk of Solesmes who is now Abbot of Quarr.  In the preface we read:

“There are some rather bold statements to be found here.  Anyone entirely committed to the cause of sixteenth-century Reformers will scarcely find them easy to swallow.”

I’m looking forward to getting into this one.  In print, it is a dense 72 pages from the purveyor of high quality Catholic Books, the increasingly indispensable Angelico Press.

 

Posted in Lighter fare, Our Solitary Boast, REVIEWS, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , , , , ,
Comments Off on BOOKS RECEIVED: Two VERY different DAUGHTERS!

I’ve decided. I’m for arming teachers and the Rule of Law

After looking at the photo which a friend sent me, I’ve decided.

Armed teachers and the Rule of Law.

HERE

Posted in Lighter fare |
8 Comments

Fr. Murray and Prof. Royal opine on latest developments

Here is the latest from Fr. Murray and Prof. Royal.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
6 Comments

St. Michael the Extremely Cool Samurai Archangel, defend us in battle!

And the seventy-two returned with joy, saying: Lord, the devils also are subject to us in thy name.  And he said to them: I saw Satan like lightning falling from heaven.  Behold, I have given you power to tread upon serpents and scorpions, and upon all the power of the enemy: and nothing shall hurt you.  But yet rejoice not in this, that spirits are subject unto you; but rejoice in this, that your names are written in heaven. [Luke 10:17-20]

Some years ago I posted some marvelous “inculturation” art by Catholic artist Daniel MitsuiSt. Michael the Archangel as a samurai kicking the devil’s back side. Very cool. It is striking, in it’s woodblock style and colors.

He has now reprinted it. The original drawing of St. Michael is on Japanese washi. The giclee print (below) is on Hahnemuhle cotton rag paper

When you order something from Daniel, it comes well wrapped.  Once out of its tough, waterproof outer envelop, the prints are in a transparent covering between double layers of cardboard.  No bent corners on them!

He sent me a copy of the new print on the new paper.

I love the katana – perhaps really a katate-uchi? – and the lightning.  You can almost hear it CRACK and Old Scratch scream in furious pain as the sword rises and falls…. rises and falls… rises and falls….

For scale, there’s a pen (not included).

The colors are amazing and movement is dynamic.

No apologies to those who think that we should not use militaristic imagery.  None. What. So. Eh-ver.  This isn’t bean bag, after all.    Francis agrees.

He (Daniel, not Francis) told me that if you order something right now, he is also sending gratis some of his bookplates.

 

Posted in Just Too Cool, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
3 Comments

“O my God, make them like a wheel; * and as stubble before the wind.” Consolation from a Psalm.

Scripture is perennially applicable.  As 2 Timothy 3 says: “All scripture, inspired of God, is profitable to teach, to reprove, to correct, to instruct in justice, that the man of God may be perfect, furnished to every good work.”  Hence, even as we read Holy Writ we will find it pertinent to our times.  This is especially the case with the Psalms, upon which we draw so much in the life of the Church.

Today a long-time reader sent me an email after he was struck by the force of Psalm 82/83 which we read as the 9th psalm in the Breviarium Romanum on Fridays for Matins.  (Yes, Novus Ordo types, you read right: the “9th psalm” of Matins!)

Let’s read it:

Psalm 82 [9]
82:2 O God, who shall be like to thee? * Hold not thy peace, neither be O God, thou still,
82:3 For lo, thy enemies have made a noise: * and they that hate thee have lifted up the head.
82:4 They have taken a malicious counsel against thy people, * and have consulted against thy saints.
82:5 They have said: Come and let us destroy them, * so that they be not a nation: and let the name of Israel be remembered no more.
82:6 For they have contrived with one consent: * they have made a covenant together against thee; the tabernacles of the Edomites, and the Ismahelites:
82:8 Moab, and the Agarens, Gebal, and Ammon and Amalec: * the Philistines, with the inhabitants of Tyre.
82:9 Yea, and the Assyrian also is joined with them: * they are come to the aid of the sons of Lot.
82:10 Do to them as thou didst to Madian and to Sisara: * as to Jabin at the brook of Cisson.
82:11 Who perished at Endor: * and became as dung for the earth.
82:12 Make their princes like Oreb, and Zeb, * and Zebee, and Salmana.
82:13 All their princes, * who have said: Let us possess the sanctuary of God for an inheritance.
82:14 O my God, make them like a wheel; * and as stubble before the wind.
82:15 As fire which burneth the wood: * and as a flame burning mountains:
82:16 So shalt thou pursue them with thy tempest: * and shalt trouble them in thy wrath.
82:17 Fill their faces with shame; * and they shall seek thy name, O Lord.
82:18 Let them be ashamed and troubled for ever and ever: * and let them be confounded and perish.
82:19 And let them know that the Lord is thy name: * thou alone art the most High over all the earth.
V. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, * and to the Holy Ghost.
R. As it was in the beginning, is now, * and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.

Ant. Alleluia, alleluia, alleluia.

My correspondent was consoled by this psalm and its assurance that God will – in his own time – sort things out in the Church.  Who can deny it?

On another note, as long as I still have you here, you will have noted the different number of the psalm: was that Ps 82 or Ps 83?

In modern Catholic books the Masoretic Hebrew numbering is followed, while in older books the Septuagint Greek numbering is used.   These different numbering systems reflect different ways of combining or dividing up certain psalms.  There is a good wikipedia article on this HERE

Sometimes when searching up a psalm from an older source you have to look on either side of the “target” number, depending on where you are in the Psalter.  So, too, when you want to check something in an older book.  Just be aware that the psalms don’t always match up in older and more modern texts.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
6 Comments

“Why Trappist ale tastes better”

At the UK’s best Catholic weekly, the Catholic Herald – PRINT edition [subscribe!] – there is a great piece about the Trappists of St. Joseph Abbey in Massachusetts who make great beer.

There are some stories in the print edition that you can’t get online.  This is one of them.   It touches all the bases: work, prayer, beer… peace.

Why Trappist ale tastes better

by Michael Davis

The Trappists of St Joseph settled in Spencer, Massachusetts, in 1950, on the site of an old farm. The soil was rocky, but that suited the monks just fine. One by one they pulled the stones from the barren earth and used them to build a monastery.

Driving down the winding road to St Joseph Abbey, I think of that arresting line from Paradise Lost: “autumnal leaves that strow the brooks, in Vallombrosa”. I’m sure Milton enjoyed the view, but Vallombrosa Abbey is in Tuscany, whereas everyone knows New England has the finest autumns. I’m visiting St Joseph in those brittle weeks before winter, when the last yellow, frost-bitten leaves still cling to the branches.

I’m greeted by Fr Dominic, the prior.

He was originally a Dominican, but felt irresistibly drawn to monasticism. “My superiors told me to spend a while with the Trappists, to get it out of my system,” he laughs. “Here I am, still trying to get it out of my system.”

We hop into my old Toyota and make our way to the brewery. We’re met by the director, Fr Isaac, and we set off on a tour. It’s quite a sight: two monks, in their black and white habits, gliding around stainless-steel brew vessels and the glass-enclosed control room used by the brewhouse team. Fr Isaac tries to explain how all the tanks and fermenters feed into each other, but he loses me pretty quickly. “Did you study brewing?” I ask, dazed. He shakes his head and grins. “Theology. And pottery.”

Now we come to the tasting, where I have a bit more expertise. It was their beer, called Spencer, that made me reach out to them. St Joseph is the only producer of authentic Trappist ale outside of Europe. The International Trappist Association was sceptical about Americans’ ability to match their quality, so they gave them a little advice: “Do only one beer, and do it perfectly.”

So they did. What makes Trappist ale so unique, Fr Isaac tells me, is that the ale undergoes two fermentations, one in the stainless steel tank and a second fermentation in each bottle. The live yeast culture in each bottle naturally carbonates the ale and gives it a unique flavour profile. (American glassmakers typically don’t make bottles strong enough to contain the pressure from the carbonation, so they have to import their bottles from Germany.) It’s a malty ale with fruit and spice aromas and a dry finish – remarkably refreshing on a hot day. Fr Isaac put it more poetically: “The full malt body provides a home for the hops.”

Today they have eight varieties, including an Imperial Stout and an IPA. The original is still my favourite, but I haven’t tried the Peach Saison yet, which was released on February 12.

I asked Fr Isaac if Spencer is available in Britain. Alas, it isn’t: British alcohol taxes are too high. (That’s why you only get dreadful, generic American beers.) But Mount St Bernard Abbey in Leicestershire is starting up its own brewery, so England will soon have a Trappist ale of her very own. [YAY!]

 There’s no doubt that Spencer Brewery is a professional operation. But the monks manage to keep their work within the ancient traditions of monastic life. The brewery staff gather every Friday for their feierabendbier, which roughly translates as “beer after work”. Cistercian monasteries are usually self-sustaining, and for centuries have brewed beer to revive themselves after a long day in the fields. (In the US, the Cistercians of the Strict Observance, or Trappists, usually only indulge once a week at their silent Sunday evening supper.)

After the brewery we head over to the cannery, which is Fr Dominic’s domain.

It’s here they make Trappist Preserves – a staple of New England breakfasts for generations. I mention to Fr Dominic that I grew up eating their jams, and he chuckles: “I used to get them in my stocking for Christmas.” Now he runs the operation.

The cannery is much older than the brewery, but that only makes the output more remarkable. They cook 1.5 tons of fruit every morning and churn out 80 jars per minute. And they work in silence.

The monks are so perfectly in sync with one another that they don’t need to ask or offer help. “Everyone has an eye on his brother,” Fr Dominic says.

We head out back to the warehouse, where pallets of jams are waiting to be shipped. I comment on the label: the black-and-white figure of a monk churning a  cauldron of fruit. “It’s relatively new,” Fr Dominic remarks. “Brother Anthony designed it. He used to work for a record label in New York doing illustrations for album covers.” Anyone I would know? “Probably.” Fr Dominic scratches his chin. “Barbra Streisand, for one.”

The last leg of my visit is to the monastery itself. This 70-year-old abbey looks almost Tudor, with its tented spires and prominent dormers. Rather a sad thought: the English Cistercians were wiped out by Henry VIII.

Fr Dominic and I walk through the long hallways. The smell is striking: cold air, old stones, musty books, rough wool, and – well, men. My guide shrugs. “That’s the smell of a monastery.” Indeed. And Fountains Abbey would have smelled the same way in 1539 when the Cistercians closed its doors for the last time.

He takes me to the library, where the brothers study. Twice a year, on the day after Christmas and on New Year’s Day, they’re allowed to eat supper there and speak. “It’s always the same meal,” says

Fr Dominic: “Tuna fish sandwiches and pickles.” He surveys the room affectionately. “But we look forward to it.”

The Trappist diet – vegetarianism,  with frequent fasting – is demanding. But there have been changes over the years. Fr Dominic had to eat plain bread for breakfast when he first arrived; the abbot has since granted permission to use a toaster.

We spend a half-hour chatting in Fr Dominic’s office. It is, of course, a plain room: no computer, no decoration. Just a few hardback chairs and a writing desk.

He uses it mostly for spiritual direction.

At one point he lets slip that he’s nearing his 69th birthday, and my jaw hits the floor. “You don’t even look 50,” I say.

He nods. “We age slower. It’s the regularity of the lifestyle”: work, fast, pray. This,  Fr Dominic notes, is a relatively recent phenomenon. In the 17th century, men only survived about 10 years in a monastery. Today, they often live another 70 on top of that.

Fr Dominic also gives credit to their freedom from the news cycle. “We used to only read the local paper, but after 9/11, we decided to branch out,” he explains. “It’s important to know what’s going on in the world so we can be compassionate – so we know whom to pray for.” Now they subscribe to two newspapers: the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. And that’s plenty. “It’s hard enough keeping up with the Word of God!” he laughs.

Then the bell tolls, and we shuffle off to Vespers. There’s a stained-glass window depicting Our Lady (the “Salve” window) and a recess behind the altar adorned with fleurs-de-lis. Otherwise, the chapel is plain. I’m seated in the back with a few laypeople who are on retreat in the abbey’s guesthouse. The monks chant the Psalms in English, their deep voices trained only by repetition. It’s a gripping and humbling experience for a ritualist like me.

Night fell some time during the prayers. There are no artificial lights as far as I can see. Presumably the fallow fields are somewhere out ahead of me, rolling into the frost-bitten woods. It takes me an hour to drive home, kick off my shoes, and crack open a bottle of Spencer. Somehow, this one tastes even better.

Michael Davis is the Catholic Herald’s
US editor

At this point I also want to remind you of the fantastic beer brewed by the fine, traditional Benedictines in Norcia, Italy.

Their monastery was destroyed by earthquakes, but they are rebuilding.  You can subscribe to have their beer delivered each month.  This is a good way to support them.

Sooooo……

QUAERITUR:  Does Trappist ale taste better?

It certain does taste better than most beer.

But this is quite the claim.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
7 Comments

WDTPRS – 3rd Sunday of Easter (Novus Ordo): a candle is honey sweet summons

This Sunday, in the Novus Ordo calendar, is called the 3rd Sunday of Easter. Let’s have a look at the Collect.

This Sunday’s Collect, it seems to me, reflects a conscious attempt on the part of Holy Church to remind us of the Easter Vigil.  As a matter of fact, let’s see if I can give you a new way to look at that Paschal candle which burns in the sanctuary during Mass in this Easter season.

The prayer has antecedents in both the Veronese and Gelasian sacramentaries, though it is not in pre-Conciliar editions of the Missale Romanum.

Semper exsultet populus tuus, Deus, renovata animae iuventute, ut, qui nunc laetatur in adoptionis se gloriam restitutum, resurrectionis diem spe certae gratulationis exspectet.

Vocabulary similar to our Collect is found in the works of St Ambrose (+397), such as his Exposition of Psalm 118 and his De mysteriis, a post-Easter explanation of the sacred, liturgical mysteries to the newly baptized.  For example, “… adulescens vel certe renovatus aquilae iuventute per baptismatis sacramenta…” (ex. Ps. cxviii, 18, 26).

Adoptio is, of course, “adoption” in the sense of “to take as one’s child.”  We find the phrase “adoptionem filiorum Dei … adoption of the sons of God” in the Latin Vulgate (cf Romans 8:23, Gal 4:5, Eph 1:5).

The words exsultet and adoptio bring our mind’s ear and eye to the Vigil of Easter, the deacon’s great moment to shine as he sings the Praeconium Paschale or Exsultet before the Paschal candle as the people hold their candles.  The Vigil is when many new Christians are by baptism made the Father’s sons and daughters through a spiritual adoption.

The Exsultet was composed perhaps as early as the fifth century. Parts may go back to St Ambrose.  In this great proclamation there are many images of light and darkness.  One image concerns the fiery light of candles: beeswax nourishes the divided and yet undiminished flame.  Pope Benedict in his sermon for the Easter Vigil of 2010 remarked that

“the cooperation of the living community of believers in the Church in some way resembles the activity of bees. It builds up the community of light. So the candle serves as a summons to us to become involved in the community of the Church, whose raison d’être is to let the light of Christ shine upon the world.”

VERY COOL POINT: Another meaning of adoptio in classical Latin is the “admission of a bee into a new hive.”

Look at what we lose when we lose our Latin.

What a marvelous way to think of sincere and observant Catholic Christians!

May all our works and words reflect the cooperation of God’s grace and love of neighbor!

May we be bright like kindled candles, honey sweet!

Some of you may be thinking, “But Father! But Father! This is over the top.  You’ve gone too far this time in making those connections.  All this… ancient stuff is not relevant to us. As a matter of fact, that was a time of PATRIARCHY, which is bad!   “FATHERS” of the Church.  Get it?  You posts are triggering me!  And I even called you “Father”!  See what you’ve done? Your are an angry and hate-filled micro-aggressor and YOU HATE VATICAN II!”

Our prayers flow down to us from an ocean of ancient culture, pagan and Christian.  Dare I say it flows down to us like honey from the comb?

Our vocabulary retains overtones of the Roman military, of agriculture, philosophy and religion. In previous centuries, people not yet gifted with glowing screens and text messaging more easily heard connections between fleeting phrases. They needed as a hook only a few words of a psalm, or even a single unusual word to evoke a massive interior meaning.  For them, certain words and phrases were like the TARDIS: bigger on the inside.  In the Gospels, Our Lord constantly alludes to psalms and the prophets. His (often hostile) listeners caught these allusions immediately.  People of seemingly simpler oral/aural cultures are better at this than we O so technologically sophisticated denizens of the West.  Our memories and attention spans are shrinking with each apparent advance.

But I digress. What was I talking about, again?

SLAVISHLY LITERAL ATTEMPT:

O God, let your people rejoice always, the youth of spirit having been renewed, so that they (the people) who rejoice now that they have been restored in the glory of spiritual adoption, may in the hope of true thanksgiving await the day of the resurrection.

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

God our Father, may we look forward with hope to our resurrection, for you have made us your sons and daughters, and restored the joy of our youth.

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

May your people exult for ever, O God, in renewed youthfulness of spirit, so that, rejoicing now in the restored glory of our adoption, we may look forward in confident hope to the rejoicing of the day of resurrection.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , ,
3 Comments

@austinruse on “Slippery Jim” @JamesMartinSJ and his non-explanation explanation

Over at the excellent Crisis I see that Austin Ruse (President of the Center for Family and Human Rights – C-Fam) has caught up.

He penned a piece about Jesuit homosexualist activist James Martin’s wobbly affirmation of “official” Catholic teaching about homosexuality and homosexual acts.   Ruse made pretty much the same point I made several days ago.  HERE

However, Ruse always writes well.  I liked this bit in particular along with the great title.

James Martin S.J. vs James Martin S.J.

Donald Trump might refer to James Martin S.J. as “Slippery Jim.” He is certainly slippery. His latest act of slipperiness is a column he published this week at America wherein he claims to support the teaching of the Church on homosexuality.

[…]

He goes on to quote my good friend Fr. Gerald Murray, who is always worth paying attention to.

Father Gerald Murray points out that for Martin “…a disordered inclination or tendency is ‘one of the deepest parts of a person.’ He refers to ‘the part that gives and receives love.’ It is our heart and soul that constitute our innermost being, the center of love. An inclination toward unnatural sexual activity is not the heart and soul of a person. True love is expressed in virtuous deeds. Evil inclinations or tendencies to sin must be seen by the Christian for what they are and resisted.”

What he prefers is that the homosexual inclination is merely “differently ordered.” You are right handed, and I am left and that is just different. As Father Murray writes, such a change to differently ordered “…would mean that God created two different orders of sexual behavior that are both good and right according to his will: Some people are homosexual by God’s express design and some are heterosexual by God’s express design.” Murray says if the inclination is merely different, then the act—sodomy—is too, and therefore would be “simply natural” and not disordered.

But we know that that is not the case.  More on that HERE.

Also, Austin adds:

For some, this column settles the question. On Twitter, Elizabeth Scalia of Aleteia called the column “elegant.” My friend Maggie Gallagher says we need to take a yes for a yes. But, I do not believe this is a yes.

No.  This is not a “yes” and it wasn’t “elegant”.  It was a ruse, as Ruse and I point okay.

Martin’s piece is so filled with hedges and evasions that it cannot be taken for anything other than a signal to his followers to dig in their heels, defy the Church and continue on their merry way towards the cliff edge.

Posted in Linking Back, Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
8 Comments