ASK FATHER: How to support a seminarian assigned to our parish?

seminarians NACFrom a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Our parish has received a terrific seminarian this summer. He comes from a great background and his older brother is a priest so he seems to have a strong support at home. My question is how can my family help support him along with our parish? Aside from adding him to my intentions in my rosary, what I else can I do for him, not only now but as he continues his studies?

Prayer is a good thing, as well as intentional sacrifices and mortifications offered on his behalf and against the wiles of the Enemy.  The Rosary is a great choice.  Offering Holy Communions for him is good.  Go, perhaps, to daily Masses and when Father prepares the chalice for the Sacrifice, at the addition of the water, mentally add the seminarian to the wine to be transformed by Father and Christ’s priestly action.  Ask your Guardian Angel also to help him and to defend him from the Enemy.

Another thing you can do is contribute to his future clerical sense.  That is to say, depending on where he is in his formation – such as major seminary – you might provide for him a biretta through this blog’s ongoing BIRETTA PROJECT.   By “clerical”, we don’t mean snooty or superior, of course.  That’s for libs, with their smug condescension.  Books on the priesthood are a fine contribution.  Perhaps something like  Those Mysterious Priests by Fulton J. Sheen (US HERE – UK HERE) or even The Priest Is Not His Own which is terrific (US HERE – UK HERE).  Joseph Ratzinger put out a little book of reflections on priesthood called Ministers of Your Joy: Scriptural Meditations on Priestly Spirituality (US HERE – UK HERE).  There are myriad more books.  Perhaps, Fathers out there reading this… you could post or send your own suggestions about works on priesthood which were and are helpful for you.

I just had a thought… what a great gift it would be for a seminarian, a newly ordained priest, or a veteran, to receive a Kindle pre-loaded with a couple dozen or more books on priesthood.  Interesting, no?  I suppose one would have to…

  1. create an email that could be handed over to Father (or the seminarian);
  2. form a group who could purchase and send as gifts the Kindle books to that email address;
  3. load them on the Kindle;
  4. give the pre-loaded Kindle to Father along with email address and password.

People could then continue to add titles as they surface.  Even if Father moves to another place, the Kindle could still receive so long as books are sent to that email.  Also, that priest could also pass the Kindle along, with the email and password, to another priest or seminarian.  Father or the seminarian could create wishlist as well.  Kindle (US HERE – UK HERE).

You can even get the pre-Conciliar Roman Breviary on Kindle in ENGLISH in two-monthly portions (e.g., current July/Aug 2017 – US HERE – UK HERE).

I like this idea.

However, remember when trying to give support to a seminarian to keep balance between friendly presence and a bit of distance.  We must never make a seminarian feel obliged to remain in seminary if priesthood truly isn’t his calling.  A man must be totally free in making his choice without a sense that, because people were good or generous to him, he has to stay in.  Get my drift?  Avoid psychological pressure at all costs.  Giving some things anonymously is often a good plan.  Find the balance.

GUEST PRIEST BONUS RESPONSE: Fr. Tim Ferguson

Prayer is one of the best things you can do. Let him know of your prayers. Get the address of the seminary he’ll be returning to in the Fall and make a plan of writing to him. Gifts are nice, but use some common sense with gifts – seminarians often get inundated with well-meant, but ill-conceived gifts. It is likely, for example, that the seminarian already has a rosary. Statues, prayer books, and religious tchotchkes of all sorts – unless the seminarian has expressed a specific interest in something – are likely to be appreciated as far as the sentiment is concerned, but are less appreciated than, say, a gift certificate for a religious goods or clerical clothing store. A gift certificate to a local restaurant can be a good things – seminarians will occasionally have some free time, and a chance to get off campus for a nice dinner with friends can be a healing salve. Depending on how far away the seminary is, some gifts that have a local flavor can be kind – candy from a hometown candy store, or a small memento from a local sports team. When you do write to your seminarian, be sure to include a family picture – perhaps even something with the local parish church in the background.

While he’s still in town, invite him over to dinner, or out to a local restaurant. Get to know him, and let him know of your prayerful support for him as he continues his discernment and formation.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Priests and Priesthood, Seminarians and Seminaries | Tagged ,
7 Comments

WDTPRS 4th Sunday after Pentecost: O Captain, my Captain!

I may have quoted Whitman, but, no, I’m not talking about Abraham Lincoln.

Today’s prayer is found in ancient sacramentaries, such as the Veronese and the “Hadrian” version of the Gregorian, and the so-called Gelasian.  It is unchanged in the “Tridentine” form of the Missale Romanum as my trusty copy of the 1570MR shows.  It survived the Consilium’s hackers and grafters who pieced together the Novus Ordo as the Collect for the 8th Sunday of Ordinary Time.

COLLECT: (1962 Missale Romanum): 

Da nobis, quaesumus, Domine, ut et mundi cursus pacifico nobis tuo ordine dirigatur: et Ecclesia tua tranquilla devotione laetetur.

Some vocabulary from the mighty Lewis & Short Dictionary.  Cursus can mean anything from “course, way, journey” to “course of a ship”, the “flow of conversation” and “postal route”.  Dirigo is “to give a particular direction” or “to lay or draw a straight line”.  It was used, among other things, to indicate ordering an army to march to a certain point or to direct or steer a ship on its course.    Ordo means too many things to get into in depth.  Suffice to say that it can refer to the “methodical arrangement, class or condition.” By extension it is applied to everything from the “orders” of the clergy, the way trees are planted, the lines of an army, or the banks of rowers in a ship.  Pacificus is a composite of pax and facio meaning “peacemaker” or “peaceable”.  The problem with that laetetur is that it could be from the deponent laetor or passive from laeto.  Because of those ablatives in that clause, I am opting here for the passive, like dirigatur.   Among the things that devotio means are “fealty, allegiance, piety, devotion, zeal.”

LITERAL ATTEMPT

Grant us, we beg, O Lord, both that the course of the world be set by Your methodical peace-producing plan for us and that Your Church may be made joyful by means of tranquil devotion.

Despite the wordy literal translation I have given this time, I will later lend to this a rather poetic aspect.

Notice that in our collect’s vocabulary there are traces of military and nautical imagery.

Try reading this prayer with the mental image of a ship.

Its great Captain sets its course upon the sea. So great is the Captain that He can command calm waters and a favorable wind as well.  The ship can be seen as the world.  In this case I see the ship as the Church in the world, the Church Militant, which is not an unfamiliar image to those familiar with the Barque of Peter.  The sea it sails upon is the deep and turbulent world we live in.  The Captain is our Lord Jesus Christ, who calmed the stormy waters and commanded Peter to walk to Him upon them.  He entrusted His ship to Peter, to steer it in His stead.  Once all has been put into proper order, made “ship-shape and Bristol fashion”, our own sense of loyal zeal, our devotion, is the wind that the Captain uses to steer the ship upon the course He sets, carrying us its crew to the port and safe haven.

The word pacificus brought to mind an antiphon of First Vespers of Christmas: “Rex pacificus magnificatus est, cuius vultum desiderat universa terra… The peacemaker King, whose glance the whole world longs for, has been exalted.”  Is not the sight of God, “in whose will is our peace”, our true desire?  Is that not the port and safe haven we journey towards in the turbulence of this world?

We must look more intently at devotio… devotion.

According to St. Thomas Aquinas (+1274) writing in his monumental Summa Theologiae, devotio is an “active” virtue.  The Angelic Doctor wrote:

“The intrinsic or human cause of devotion is contemplation or meditation. Devotion is an act of the will by which a man promptly gives himself to the service of God. Every act of the will proceeds from some consideration of the intellect, since the object of the will is a known good; or as Augustine says, willing proceeds from understanding. Consequently, meditation is the cause of devotion since through meditation man conceives the idea of giving himself to the service of God” (STh II-II 82, 3).

The Jesuit preacher Louis Bourdaloue (1632-1704) translates this into “a devotion to duty”. What we do, including our “devotions”, must help us keep the commandments of God and stick to the duties of one’s state in life before all else. (See? Not everything from Jesuits is to be avoided!)

In other words, there is an interplay between our devotions and our devotion.

Each of us has a state in life, a God-given vocation we are duty bound to follow. We must be devoted to that state in life, and the duties that come with it, as they are in the here and now.

That “here and now”, hic et nunc, is important.

We must not focus on the state we had once upon a time, or wish we had, or should have had, or might have someday: those are unreal and misleading fantasies that distract us from reality and God’s will.

If we are truly devoted and devout (in the sense of the active virtue) to fulfilling the duties of our state as it truly is here and now, then God will give us every actual grace we need to fulfill our vocation. Why can we boldly depend on God to help us? If we are fulfilling the duties of our state of life, then we are also fulfilling our proper roles in His great plan, His design from before the creation of the universe. God is therefore sure to help us. And if we are devoted to our state as it truly is, then God can also guide us to a new vocation when and if that is His will for us.

Faithful in what we must do here and now, we will be open to something God wants us to do later.

This attachment to reality and sense of dutiful obedience through the active virtue devotio is a necessary part of religion in keeping with the biblical principle in 1 John 2:3-5:

And by this we may be sure that we know Him, if we keep His commandments. He who says ‘I know Him’ but disobeys His commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him; but whoever keeps his word, in him truly love for God is perfected. By this we may be sure that we are in Him: he who says he bides in Him ought to walk in the same way in which He walked.

Before the creation of the universe God knew each one of us and desired us and loved us.

He called us into existence as a precise point in His great plan, His economy of salvation.  He gives us a part to play in that plan and gives each of us the tools and talents we need to fulfill it.  If we devote ourselves with real devotio to our state-in-life and strive to carry out His will, God will give us every actual grace we need since we are furthering His great plan.

This is why I suggest above that our devotion can be like the wind that the Captain uses to direct our great ship.  More than just being the “hands on deck”, we play a vital part in the actual forward motion of the ship. We are not merely being hauled along upon the “alien merits” of Christ, as some Protestants call God’s saving intervention.  While we truly depend on Him and Him alone, while we truly do not merit what He provides, mysteriously it is part of His plan. He brings it to pass that His work becomes ours and ours His.  He “makes it so”.

A Somewhat Smoother Version:

Grant, we beseech you, O Lord, that the course of the world be steered by your plan for peace and that your Church be filled with joy from tranquil devotion to that plan.

Or a bit more poetic:

O Lord, we beg Thee to grant that the peaceful steerage of the world’s course be set according to Thy plan and that Thy Church be made full with joy from our tranquil devotion.

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

Lord, guide the course of world events and give your Church the joy and peace of serving you in freedom.

It is hard to strike a balance between the literal, which can be awkward and wordy, and the simple, which can be banal and miss the real impact of the prayer.

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

Grant us, O Lord, we pray, that the course of our world may be directed by your peaceful rule and that your Church may rejoice, untroubled in her devotion.

You decide.

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS | Tagged , ,
3 Comments

ASK FATHER: Lesbian Communion Ministers

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

My Pastor allows 2 women who are in a public relationship (of the rainbow variety) to be Eucharistic ministers. What is the best way to approach him with my disapproval with the hopes of it stopping. (My 9 y/o daughter mentioned to me one morning at the end of Mass that she thought it was a man but when she got up close realized it was a woman.) If it does not stop and I am yelled down (as I expect, but pray not), what recourse is there?

GUEST PRIEST RESPONSE: Fr. Tim Ferguson

First of all, we must be precise with terminology. A lay person who distributes Holy Communion is an Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion, a title as bulky and uncomfortable as the regular use of such creatures should be rare.

Like all ministers of the Church, ordinary and extraordinary, it is required that they live according to the dictates of the Church, strive for holiness, and avoid giving scandal. It is difficult to see how someone living in an object state of sin could fulfill these obligations. In fact, it’s quite impossible.

The faithful, of course, have the right to bring their concerns to their pastors. First, one must be certain that one has all the facts at hand, mindful that gossip and calumny are sins. The virtue of prudence also comes in to play here. Sadly, in these days, our pastors don’t always respond to our concerns as they should. In this case, we should ask – is the pastor already aware of this situation? What is his likely response? Our interlocutor seems to expect being yelled down. What then would be accomplished by raising these concerns, if the situation is not thusly rectified? One might gain the moral satisfaction of having done the right thing, and there is much to be said about those who, in the face of grave opposition, hold fast to the truth. Our Dear Lord also advised us to be as “wise as serpents and as simple as doves.”

We often speak of prayer as a sort of last resort. If we can’t “do” anything, we say, “well, at least, I’ll pray for you.” That seems to betray a bit of weakness of faith, when prayer is quite often our most powerful weapon. Storm heaven, both for this pastor, and for this couple who are, apparently, living in a state of objective sin. Pray that their hearts be turned to love and to follow the Church’s clear commands – for those commands are the stones with which the path to heaven is paved. All other paths are perilous. Pray to Our Lady, that their hearts may be softened and become docile to the commandments of the Lord. Pray to St. Clare, so diligent in defense of the Blessed Sacrament. Pray to their Guardian Angels. Pray especially to the Lord Jesus Christ, who wishes their conversion and their sanctification.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , ,
9 Comments

BOOK REMINDER: The Cardinal Müller Report: An Exclusive Interview on the State of the Church

I bring to the attention of the readership a new book from Ignatius Press. It is clearly meant to hearken to the now-classic and still relevant Ratzinger Report published in 1985 (US HERE – UK HERE). Joseph Ratzinger was Prefect of the CDF then, as Card. Müller is Prefect has been for the last five years until 1 July 2017.

Now Card. Müller, 69, is off the leash, in that Pope Francis didn’t assign him to another mandate.  The word going around is that Müller declined another appointment, since anything after CDF would be a demotion.  Can his book give us any clues as to what he will do in the future?  Card. Burke hasn’t been invisible and quiet.  What about Müller?

¡Hagan lío!

The Cardinal Müller Report: An Exclusive Interview on the State of the Church

US HERE – UK HERE

 

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, The Campus Telephone Pole, The Coming Storm | Tagged
Comments Off on BOOK REMINDER: The Cardinal Müller Report: An Exclusive Interview on the State of the Church

Your Sunday Sermon Notes

Was there a good point made in the sermon you heard during the Holy Mass in fulfillment your of Sunday Obligation? Let us know.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
7 Comments

READER FEEDBACK: good for the spine

From a reader:

Knowing well that a positive note can be a good thing for the soul, I just wanted to write a message to thank you for continually helping me (and I presume many others) to “man up” and be courageous in these dark days. Being depressive enough by nature, I feel that I can privately end up whining instead of clinging closer to Christ. Some of your recent posts these past few weeks have stiffened up my spine in a good way.

And, thus, I share this with the readership so that they, too, can be strengthend in turn by your resolve.

Posted in Reader Feedback |
6 Comments

NEW PREFECT for CDF: Archbp. Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer, SJ

Published on: Jul 1, 2017 @ 06:10 CDT (1119 UTC)

It seems that Arcbp. Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer, SJ, will be the new Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.  He has been the Secretary of the same Congregation.

The Bolletino in Italian:  HERE

Conclusione del mandato quinquennale del Prefetto della Congregazione per la Dottrina della Fede e nomina del successore

Il Santo Padre Francesco ha ringraziato l’Eminentissimo Signor Cardinale Gerhard Ludwig Müller alla conclusione del suo mandato quinquennale di Prefetto della Congregazione per la Dottrina della Fede e di Presidente della Pontificia Commissione “Ecclesia Dei”, della Pontificia Commissione Biblica e della Commissione Teologica Internazionale, ed ha chiamato a succedergli nei medesimi incarichi Sua Eccellenza Reverendissima Monsignor Luis Francisco Ladaria Ferrer, S.I., Arcivescovo titolare di Tibica, finora Segretario della Congregazione per la Dottrina della Fede.

Friends, this could have gone in an unthinkable direction, but it did not.  Frankly, I’m pleased with the appointment.   When I consider the other names that have been tossed about for this post… we have dodged a big one.

UPDATE: I am told that Card. Müller will not have another appointment in the Curia.  After all, once he has been the Prefect of the CDF, which has always been known as “La Suprema”, there is only demotion.  It is hard to imagine that he will go to Germany as a diocesan bishop.  There is a possibility that he’ll wind up, at only 69, as Patron of the Knights of the Holy Sepulcher (which position is still at present filled).

However, if Card. Müller doesn’t have an appointment, and is effectively “retired”, then he is off the leash.

What is interesting is the timing of the announcement of the new Prefect.  Rather than make the announcement on Monday (which would make sense), it is made in advance, a virtual preemptive strike.   It could be that the powers-that-are rushed to get the news out because that feared that Card. Müller would go to the press (perhaps because that’s what they did/would have done).

Again, Card. Müller, without an appointment, is off the leash.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío! | Tagged ,
34 Comments

ASK FATHER: Why are “ad orientem” and Communion on the tongue preferable?

leafhopperFrom a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I am a convert to the faith 27 years ago and was just recently ordained a permanent Deacon. I am curios as to why celebrating the mass ad orientum and reception on the tongue exclusively are preferable. I often find myself near tears when receiving the Eucharist and was just wondering why receiving in the hand should not be allowed.

There are some common misspellings that crop up frequently in this line of work. Occasionally, one sees reference to alter boys, which is alarming (at least to non-Jesuits). One hears stories of lectors proclaiming that a reading is from St. Paul’s Letter to the Filipinos. And frequently the liturgical phrase “ad orientem” is butchered.

BTW… the orientus (which in Latin would give us the accusative form orientum) is a genus of critter in the leafhopper family. Hence, offering the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass “ad orientum” would be offering it toward or in the presence of this irritating little bug. Something we might end up doing incidentally, if the church has not been thoroughly cleaned by the aspirants of the Blessed Imelda Lambertini Society alter… no… altar guild section. But that’s something we should not intend to do.

Instead, we should offer the Holy Sacrifice facing – at least symbolically – the direction of the rising sun, the orient, or, in Latin, oriens (in the accusative form orientem).

As to the specifics of why worship ad orientem is preferable and why reception of Holy Communion on the tongue is preferable, there have already been many electrons spilled on this blog to cover the topic. You might do a little searching around in these webby pages.

Also, try reading Dominus Est, a wonderful little book on the Eucharist by Bp. Athanasius Schneider, and The Spirit of the Liturgy, by Pope Benedict XVI, aka Joseph Ratzinger.

Those highly useful and readable books will not fulfill your self-identification as “curios”, however.

US HERE – UK HERE

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
16 Comments

ASK FATHER: Could a “Pope Emeritus” under 80 vote in a Conclave?

popes_posterFrom a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Canonically speaking, if a Pope emeritus were alive at the time of the conclave to elect his successor’s successor, given he was a Cardinal and Pontiff, may he vote if he were under 80 years old? If he is over 80, may he participate in the same manner that other super-annuated cardinals are permitted to participate?

We are waaaay into the realm of speculation.

However, if we start from a couple of premises, and noting that we won’t be seeing anything like this in the near future, maybe we can think it through.

First, being a Cardinal is an specific role.  It can be conferred and removed and resigned.  It seems to me that when Cardinal Ratzinger was elected, he ceased to be a Cardinal and began to be Roman Pontiff.  With his resignation, he did not become a Cardinal again.  Before he resigned, Benedict could have decreed that, with the instant of his resignation, he would be a Cardinal again, or still.  He didn’t do that.  Furthermore, in no way has he comported himself as a Cardinal, retired or other.

WERE Benedict a Cardinal, then, being over 80, he would not be able to vote in the Conclave, but he would be able to participate in the events leading up to the Conclave.   If he thought he was still a Cardinal, he could have – before his abdication – changed the laws of the Conclave in regard to voting age.  But, he didn’t.

The same would apply to Pope Francis were he to resign.  He would have the option to say, “After I resign, I’ll be a Cardinal.”  He would have the option to do what Benedict did… or didn’t.  He could determine – before his resignation – what his role would be or he could be silent about it.  The next Pope could determine a role for him, or not.

So, this is waaaay out there in the realm of unsettling speculation.

I, for one, don’t long to see a multiplication of these resignations or emeriti, regardless of the affection one might have for them.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Benedict XVI, Francis | Tagged , ,
5 Comments

Erasing the Magisterium of a Pope. Wherein Fr. Z rants and suggests.

damnatio_memoriaeThere is a long standing political tool employed to eliminate opposition which is associated with the past, or a defeated regime.  You can see evidence of this tool all around Rome, in monuments both ancient and recent.  It is called damnatio memoriae… the condemnation of the memory (of someone).  In effect, the winners destroy even the memory of the losers by effacing and erasing their very names from public view… as if they never existed.  For the ancient Roman, this was a fate worse than death.  The Roman wanted to extend the gloria of his family, especially through public works which would bring honor to their names in perpetuity.  Think about the way Paul V put “BORGHESE” smack in the middle of the facade of St. Peter’s Basilica.  In any event, walking about in Rome you can see inscriptions wherein the names of the defeated were literally chiseled out or filled in, made illegible.

It has become evident over the last few years, that there is a major agenda item on the slate of those who are around Pope Francis. They are working on the systematic erosion, degradation, scratching out, erasure, the damnatio memoriae of the Magisterium of St. John Paul II.

John Paul, with his “theology of the body” reinforced the Church’s constant teaching about the inseparable connection of sexual acts and marriage.  Today, there are legions made of seemingly disparate groups who tirelessly work along side each other to pull sex and marriage apart.  If they can accomplish that “divorce”, then virtually anything in the Church can be restructured for their own temporal ends, whatever they may be – homosexual “marriage”, Communion for divorced and remarried self-identifying lesbian or questioning giraffes, etc.  It’s mostly about sex for the agents in the field, agents of the Enemy of the soul, that is.

After the 1980 Synod (“walking together”) of Bishops on the Family (sound familiar?), Pope John Paul II responded to a suggestion from the Synod and established the Pontifical Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family and the Pontifical Council for the Family. The establishment of the Institute was supposed to be announced by John Paul during his Wednesday General Audience on 13 May 1981. Does that date sound familiar? After John Paul recovered from the assassination attempt, with the help of Our Lady of Fatima, he formally established the institute on the Feast of the Holy Rosary on 7 October 1982, and entrusted it to Our Lady of Fatima. Thus, the institute was a monument to how Popes and Synods can work together (in a way that doesn’t involved rigging them to pre-determined outcomes) and how the Family and our Marian devotion intersect.

The first head of the Institute, situated at the Lateran University in Rome, was one Carlo Caffarra, later Archbp. Cardinal of Bologna and, more recently, one of the Four Cardinals of the Five Dubia. As a matter of fact, he probably wrote the dubia.

As an aside which isn’t an aside,  Card. Caffarra, in an interview in 2008, revealed that, when John Paul had asked him to found the Institute, he wrote a letter to Sr. Lucia dos Santos, the last living visionary of the Fatima apparitions.  Sr. Lucia wrote back to him and said that the final battle between Christ and Satan would be over marriage and the family.  She also said not to be afraid and that anyone who works for the sanctity of marriage and the family will always be opposed because this is the decisive issue.

So, the John Paul II Institute for Marriage and Family is to be renamed:

Institute of Studies on the Family.

Nota bene the absence of “John Paul II” and “Marriage”.

17_06_30_Institute_Family_screenshotAs of this writing, it still bears its proper name.  HERE

More on changes HERE

The Institute is also now caught up in the restructuring which is going on, so its leadership and, hence, direction will also change.

St. John Paul cannot be erased from the “album of the saints” in which he has been enrolled, but that doesn’t mean that, as many other saints have been, he won’t be forgotten.  As I write this, it is the feast of St. Pope Paul I (+767).  Do you think about him often?

Moreover, the saintly Pope John Paul would never have thought of his own gloria in establishing an institute for the family and marriage.  That doesn’t mean that others won’t try systematically to eliminate the influence of John Paul Magisterium for their own purposes.

I have from time to time suggested that you form “base communities” to combat the onslaught from within and without the Church on our Three C’s of Cult, Code and Creed.

Here’s a suggestion.  How about starting a reading group, in your parish or down at the local breakfast and coffee shop (where you might be more welcome in some cases).  Choose as your first item Pope John Paul II’s Post-synodal Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris corsortio, (The Role of Christian Family in Modern World) which he penned after the 1980 Synod (“walking together”).

You can get it online (for now). Or, for less than the price of the cup of coffee at the shop you choose, you can get a booklet.

US HERE – UK HERE

Read it with others.  Read it with a pen in hand.

When you hear something that contradicts Familiaris ask questions.

How else do we learn?

Posted in One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Semper Paratus, Synod, The Coming Storm, The Drill | Tagged , , , , ,
19 Comments