Wherein Fr. Z gives a gift to his brother priests, confessors

20140328-193959.jpgToday I watched the video of the Pope who made his own confession before hearing the confessions of others. HERE

That juxtaposition brought forcefully into my mind both the prayers I usually say before and after making my own confession, and those which I usually say before and after hearing the confessions of others, either immediately or shortly after.

So, because it is Lent, and because it is Friday, and because I know that many priests have confessions scheduled for tomorrow, Saturday, here are the texts of the prayers for before and after hearing confessions.

They are taken from a small, old prayer book for priests from 1935. How I wish Baronius or someone else would make beautiful new editions of these old prayer books for priests!

I have used these prayers during my whole priesthood now, and they say it all. You could do a lot worse, Fathers, than to adopt them as your own. They provide a realistic view of the gravity of the office and work of the confessor, as well as hold up some ideals… and a mirror in which we can scrutinize ourselves as confessors. They are both sobering and consoling.

In the following, I added some typographical characters and I put in the accents to help your pronunciation, if you decide to do them in Latin. Over time, they become old friends and, frankly, they are richer in content then the translations, below. Also, I have a recording of the prayers in Latin, at the end.

ORATIO SACERDOTIS ANTEQUAM CONFESSIONES EXCIPIAT

Da mihi, Dómine, sédium tuárum assistrícem sapiéntiam, ut sciam iudicáre pópulum tuum in iustítia, et páuperes tuos in iudício. Fac me ita tractáre claves regni cælórum, ut nulli apériam, cui claudéndum sit, nulli claudam, cui aperiéndum. Sit inténtio mea pura, zelus meus sincérus, cáritas mea pátiens, labor meus fructuósus. Sit in me lénitas non remíssa, aspéritas non sevéra; páuperem ne despíciam, díviti ne adúler. Fac me ad alliciéndos peccatóres suávem, ad interrogándos prudéntem, ad instruéndos perítum. Tríbue, quæso, ad retrahéndos a malo sollértiam, ad con?rmándos in bono sedulitátem, ad promovéndos ad melióra indústriam: in respónsis maturitátem, in consíliis rectitúdinem, in obscúris lumen, in impléxis sagacitátem, in árduis victóriam: inutílibus collóquiis ne detínear, pravis ne contáminer; álios salvem, me ipsum non perdam. Amen.

PRIEST’S PRAYER BEFORE HEARING CONFESSIONS

Grant to me, O Lord, that wisdom seated beside Thy throne, that I may know how to judge Thy people with justice, and Thy poor ones with discernment. Make me so to use the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, that I may open them to no one upon whom they should be closed, nor close them upon any to whom they should be opened. May my intention be pure, my zeal sincere, my charity patient, my labor fruitful. Let there be in me a gentleness which is not negligent, a severity which is not harsh; let me not look down on the poor; let me not fawn upon rich. Make me pleasant for attracting sinners, prudent in questioning them, resourceful in directing them. Grant, I beseech Thee, ingenuity for drawing them back from sin, earnestness in con?rming them in good, diligence in urging them to better things: grant me good judgment in responses, rectitude in advice, light in obscure matters, wisdom in complications, victory in adversities: Let me not be detained in useless conversations, let me not be stained by perversities; let me save others, and let me not lose myself. Amen.

ORATIONES SACERDOTIS POSTQUAM CONFESSIONES EXCEPERIT

Dómine Iesu Christe, dulcis amátor et sancti?cátor animárum, purí?ca, óbsecro, per infusiónem Sancti Spíritus cor meum ab omni a?ectióne et cogitatióne vitiósa, et quidquid a me in meo múnere sive per neglegéntiam, sive per ignorántiam peccátum est, tua in?níta pietáte et misericórdia supplére dignéris. Comméndo in tuis amabilíssimis vulnéribus omnes ánimas, quas ad pæniténtiam traxísti, et tuo pretiosíssimo Sánguine sancti?cásti, ut eas a peccátis ómnibus custódias et in tuo timóre et amóre consérves, in virtútibus in dies magis promóveas, atque ad vitam perdúcas ætérnam: Qui cum Patre et Spíritu Sancto vivis et regnas in s?cula sæculórum. Amen.

Dómine Iesu Christe, ?li Dei vivi, súscipe hoc obséquii mei ministérium in amóre illo superdigníssimo, quo beátam Maríam Magdalénam omnésque ad te confugiéntes peccatóres absolvísti, et quidquid in sacraménti huius administratione neglegénter minúsque digne perféci, tu per te supplére et satisfácere dignéris. Omnes et síngulos, qui mihi modo conféssi sunt, comméndo dulcíssimo Cordi tuo rogans, ut eósdem custódias et a recidíva præsérves atque post huius vitæ misériam mecum ad gáudia perdúcas ætérna. Amen.

PRIEST’S PRAYERS AFTER HEARING CONFESSIONS

Lord Jesus Christ, sweet lover and sancti?er of souls, I pray Thee, through the infusion of the Holy Spirit, purify my heart from every corrupt feeling or thought and, through Thy in?nite compassion and mercy, deign to make good any transgression whatsoever made by me in my service due to my negligence or my ignorance. I commend to Thy most lovable wounds all the souls whom Thou hast drawn to repentance, and whom Thou hast sancti?ed by Thy Precious Blood, so that Thou mayest guard them from every sin and keep them in Thy love and in Thy fear, promote in them each day more virtues, and lead them to eternal life. You who live and reign with the Father and the Holy Spirit for ever and ever. Amen.

O Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the living God, accept this ministry of my obedience with that surpassing love with which Thou didst absolve St. Mary Magdalene and all sinners ?ying to Thee for refuge, and whatever in the administration of this Sacrament I performed negligently and less than worthily, deign to supply and satisfy. I commend to Thy most sweet Heart each and every person who has just now confessed to me, asking that Thou mayest guard them and keep them from backsliding and, after the misery of this life, that thou mayest lead them with me to the joys everlasting. Amen.

I used good ol’ “Thou” and retained something of the flowery style of yesteryear because, after all, there’s really nothing wrong with that at all.

I have turned on the combox moderation. I will accept comments from priests or bishops, which I receive in the combox or in email, and I will even anonymize them on request. I will more than likely not – not – post any comment made by a lay person or a permanent deacon. I am not really talking to you. Go ahead and call it clericalism: you are merely being permitted to listen in because, given that this is a blog, I can’t stop you. Read HERE if you want my defense. I might… might… post something of a transitional deacon or a seminarian (still laity)… might. Make it really good. Impress me.

Finally, lay people, please pray for your priests. Pray that they with soften and hear confessions if they don’t or won’t. Pray that they will be good and faithful confessors who will use good judgment, will not not use false charity, will not fudge in order to be liked, will always do his best with the help of God’s grace.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, New Evangelization, PRAYERCAzT: What Does The (Latin) Prayer Really Sound L, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , , ,
2 Comments

Dissent into Hell – Fr. Z rants

I was just on air with Drew Mariani (Relevant Radio) and we spoke for a while about death and confession. He mentioned one of my blog posts from 2011. Since he said that he is going to link here, I figured I would re-post the piece he mentioned.

Here it is:

Dissent into Hell – Fr. Z rants

Lately there has been a sharp uptick in the media – even “Catholic” media – in open and cavalier dissent from the Church’s teaching and the authority of her duly ordained pastors.  Much of it seems to revolve around the two poles of personal claims of self-determination and autonomy from anything outside one’s own skull or one’s groin.

Many who dissent from the Church’s teachings and authority simply don’t know any better.  They were, perhaps, never taught or they were taught error.  I tremble for those who are responsible for their ignorance.

Some dissenters know full well what they are refusing to accept.  I worry that they are in peril of going to Hell.   Tragically, they are dragging people into confusion with them and putting their souls in peril as well.  Tragically, some of the Church’s pastors are watching it happen.

In so doing we make ourselves slaves of the world, the flesh and the devil and we could wind up in hell as a result.

It is a terrible thing even to think, much less say, but I suspect that in our O-so-sophisticated-age, this time of picking and choosing, not many people are actually going to their judgment in the friendship of God.

St. Teresa of Avila was granted a vision in which she saw souls falling into hell “like snowflakes”.  If memory serves, the three children of Fatima were given the same vision with the same sight of falling souls so numerous that they were like a snowfall.

Many saints have said this in the past.  Is the situation worse now?  I don’t know.  It might be, because the prevailing attitude today, at least in wealthy regions, seems to be autonomy and self-determination without regard for anything transcendent, even while what is truly transcendent is being replaced by concern for the environment, or chimeric personal “rights”, blah blah blah.

Give the way the dissolution of mores is accelerating and given the weakening of the bonds of society ad intra and ad extra regarding even the Church, I don’t know if we can reverse the trend anymore. Nevertheless, the one important challenge that has never changed for everyone through all ages remains.  In accord with our state in life we must do our best to get to heaven.  We have to do what small things we can for ourselves and loved ones and those immediately in our sphere.  We simply must persevere.

The terrible alternative should be a point for daily reflection.

Christ, God, gave us the Catholic Church.  It is the Church He founded.  He gave us the sacraments as the ordinary means of salvation.  He gave His own authority to the Church to teach about faith and morals.  He gave us a visible point of reference for unity and security of knowledge for our membership in His Church: Peter and his successors and the apostles and their successors with Peter.

Knowingly reject the Church – and Peter – and the Church’s teaching and her discipline of Christ’s sacraments, and you place yourself on a path that might just land you in hell for eternity.

If nothing else from this rant gets through to readers, and this is especially my plea to priests and bishops, I beg you on my knees, I implore you: make it a habit to think about the Four Last Things at least once a day.  We are all going to die.  We must all go before our Judge to give an account of the gift of life and the graces we have been offered.

Nothing will change this vector we are on within the Church and throughout the world until Catholics engage in a serious renewal of our liturgical worship of Almighty God.  And that might not work either, frankly.   It may, however, save some souls who would otherwise be lost.  That’s not nothing and it is worth our effort.

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Linking Back, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, What Fr. Z is up to, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , ,
20 Comments

Confessions to be heard for 24 hours in….

Fr. Z kudos to the Archbp. of San Antonio.

From the Express-News:

Confessions to be heard for 24 hours at downtown church

SAN ANTONIO — The sacrament of confession will be offered for 24 hours straight by a team of priests and San Antonio Archbishop Gustavo García-Siller starting Saturday evening at St. Francesca di Paola Catholic Church, a parish on the northwestern edge of downtown visible from Interstates 10 and 35.

It’s in response to Pope Francis’ call on dioceses worldwide to provide “24 hours for the Lord” this weekend for round-the-clock confessions and prayer at a designated parish as part of Lent, the archbishop said.

“We also want to promote that when people leave, they forgive someone else,” García-Siller said. “If you have something against someone, those healing moments will go a long ways.”

The church is at 205 Piazza Italia. Read more at ExpressNews.com.

So… is anything like this going on where you are?

Chime in and then…

GO TO CONFESSION!

UPDATE:

The service in St. Peter’s Square is going to begin soon.  They are praying the Rosary at the moment.

A live shot.

 

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
25 Comments

POLITICO: POTUS in the Pope’s penumbra

From Politico:

Obama’s papal audience

VATICAN CITY — President Barack Obama was once the biggest superstar on the international stage. On Thursday, he headed here to benefit from the popularity of his replacement: Pope Francis.

The 50-minute meeting was a rare chance for Obama to associate himself with a world leader whose cool factor far outweighs his own, and it comes at a critical time in his presidency. The White House is still recovering from what aides call a “lost year,” and the president’s job approval ratings at home are dipping to new lows.

[…]

Obama planned to use the closely watched meeting to show how aligned he is with the pope on income inequality, poverty and immigration — issues important to both the White House and Democrats as they try to paint Republicans as insensitive to the needs of Americans before the upcoming midterms.

He needs the Francis bump,” said Chad Pecknold, a theology professor at The Catholic University of America.

[…]

White House aides — starting at the top with chief of staff Denis McDonough, who is an observant Catholic — speak excitedly about that connection to the pope. And that’s the sense among their outside allies as well. Francis is a huge help in talking about income inequality, they feel, both because he elevates the issue and depoliticizes it, putting the Democrats onto higher moral ground.

This reminded me of the argument in The Road to Freedom: How to Win the Fight for Free Enterprise by Arthur C. Brooks.  We must learn to present arguments in such a way that those with patently (or at least arguably) errant positions cannot merely appeal to emotion and, thereby, claim the “moral high ground” from those who tend to cite statics, which sound cold.

Just thinking out loud.

UPDATE:

From Charles Krauthammer on FNC (Andrew Napolitano heard to laugh in the background at the same time I did):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYPqXwwJecs&feature=player_embedded

Posted in Liberals, The Drill | Tagged , ,
21 Comments

MUST SEE VIDEO! The “Gilbert and Sullivan Mass”

I was alerted to this video at the blog A Man In The Gap.  And to think that this is “Lutheran Satire”.  These don’t sound the Lutherans I remember.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

 

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices |
16 Comments

Audio seminar on how Big Business Abortion handles botched abortions, injured women

Radio show Vicki McKenna, the Rush of MadCity (aka Madison, WI, aka 78 Square Miles Surrounded By Reality), spoke on air the other day (final hour on 25 March) about a 911 call from a Planned Parenthood Big-Business Abortion clinic which severely injured a woman during a botched abortion.  A less-than-urgent abortion-worker, maybe the… receptionist?… explains the situation to 911 and requests that emergency vehicles come without lights and sirens, lest anyone notice.

Vicki McKenna’s audio, from her program at WIBA, is HERE.  There are some rough details in it, be advised.

Know that this is from a live on-air, show in Madison of all places.  Is there any talk-radio like this where you are?

McKenna hits this over the fence.  Even though she talks often about local issues and politics, what she discusses could be readily applicable wherever you are.  And you don’t have to pay to listen.  You should hear her on Common Core!

Lastly, devout catholic Nancy Pelosi just accepted big business abortion Planned Parenthood’s most prestigious award.  Ain’t she grand?

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Fr. Z KUDOS, The Drill | Tagged , ,
4 Comments

The Pope and The POTUS

You may have heard that Pres. Obama met with Pope Francis today.

Some people are asking me to comment on this historic event, which liberals will surely say is the first time a Pope smiled at an American President.

Popes meet with world leaders.  Presidents visit Popes.  Ho hum.

As usual, photos were taken, gifts were exchanged, benign statements of common ground were affirmed.  What was said in private we don’t really know.

I doubt there were arguments.  Just what would that look like, anyway?  Francis threatens the intervention of angels as to Attila the Hun, if Obama doesn’t back off on the HSS Mandate?  Obama threatens drone strikes on the Casa Santa Marta, if Francis doesn’t personally conduct sodomitical marriage ceremonies and distribute condoms from the balcony of St. Peter’s?

Beyond the photo op and the feel good seed-box gift story, which was admittedly better than an iPod, the substance, as I can tell from the Press Office release, comes down to both Pope and POTUS being for freedom and against human trafficking, which is like affirming a generally accepted position such as “ignoring stop signs is bad” … unless, perhaps, those stop signs are at borders of nations.

By the way, Pres. Obama arrived with an escort of some FIFTY vehicles as well as heavily-armed special forces, as one does when visiting the Vatican.

Unless you are Pres. Bush…. or any president before this one.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , , ,
49 Comments

Fr. Murray’s clear explanation of problems with Communion for divorced, remarried.

From The Catholic Thing. My emphases and comments.

Fidelity – to Spouses and Christ’s Words

By Fr. Gerald Murray [A good friend… Fr. Murray, J.C.D., is pastor of Holy Family Church, New York, NY, and a canon lawyer.]

[QUAERITUR…] Is the most serious problem confronting Catholic families today the fact that the Church does not consider divorced and remarried Catholics suitable to receive Holy Communion? I don’t think so. I doubt most Catholics would. [But…] But in the run-up to the October Synod on the Family a number of influential churchmen seem to be of the opinion that this is the most significant problem we must deal with, and deal with in a way that the Church has never done before. A full court press is on by those who advocate that the Church change her teaching and practice on this matter.

That teaching and practice concern the indissoluble nature of marriage, and hence the adulterous nature of any second marriage entered into while one’s spouse is still living. In 1994, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), in a statement issued under the instruction of Pope John Paul II, stated quite plainly: “Members of the faithful who live together as husband and wife with persons other than their legitimate spouses may not receive Holy Communion.” [Not terribly foggy, is it?]

That teaching and practice also concern the clear obligation that anyone who is conscious of being in a state of mortal sin may not receive Holy Communion. If someone who is knowingly in a state of mortal sin receives Holy Communion, that person commits a mortal sin of sacrilegious reception of the Body of Christ. [I suppose we only ask whether or not people still have any notion that this is grave matter, if they know what the Eucharist is.]

That teaching and practice also concern the public nature of marriage, [And here we go… public.] such that any claim that a marriage was entered into invalidly must be proven before an ecclesiastical tribunal. It is not sufficient for one or both of the spouses to assert that, in good conscience, they consider their marriage to be invalid, and thus they consider themselves free to marry again. If this standard of private judgment were adopted, how would we deal with a claim of invalidity by one spouse when the other spouse was equally convinced that the marriage was valid?

The CDF stated in 1994: “The mistaken conviction of a divorced-and-remarried person that he may receive holy communion normally presupposes that personal conscience is considered in the final analysis to be able, [able!] on the basis of one’s own convictions, to come to a decision about the existence or absence of a previous marriage and the value of the new union. However, such a position is inadmissible.”

Marriage is regulated by canon law in order to safeguard the sanctity of the sacrament, to set forth and uphold the rights and duties of the couple, [OH NO!  “Rights and DUTIES”?!?!?  But Father! But Father!  Nobody has no duties no more!] and to provide for the common good by defending the nature and purpose of marriage. [Because they are not the only two people on the planet.] Catholics are obliged to marry in the Church and to submit to the laws of the Church on marriage. This is part and parcel of the Christian vocation to be living members of the Mystical Body of Christ, with due submission to the Pastors of the Church and the laws enacted to safeguard the Faith and the unity of the Church.

The Code of Canon Law teaches (canon 1134): “From a valid marriage there arises between the spouses a bond which by its nature is perpetual and exclusive. Moreover, a special sacrament strengthens and, as it were, consecrates the spouses in a Christian marriage for the duties and dignity of their state.”

This leads to the question: How do we know if the marriage is valid? Canon 1060 states: “Marriage possesses the favor of law; therefore, in a case of doubt, the validity of a marriage must be upheld until the contrary is proven.” [PROVEN! Not “asserted”.  But, these days, after decades of silly education etc., you can lead people in a discussion from point A to B to C and, when you get to your inescapable conclusion, she will say, “That might be true for you… but it isn’t true for me.”  Nevertheless, the Church has laws, procedure, tribunals.]

[This is where life gets real…] This presumption of validity is absolutely crucial to the life of the Church: What you vow at the altar has a real effect: you become married for life. It is not make believe, it is not a contingent thing subject to reversal. You are married and you will be treated as such by the Church. If a cause exists that rendered the vows ineffectual, that has to be proven, not simply asserted. [GMTA]

A lawfully married person is permitted to formulate a doubt about the validity of his or her marriage, but that doubt must be submitted to an ecclesiastical tribunal where it will be adjudicated.

So the notion[which is something you use in… sewing… I believe…] that an individual should be allowed to judge the validity of his own marriage, with the juridical effect that he would be able to declare the marriage invalid and then remarry in the Church is truly revolutionary. [In the Roman way of thinking, revolution, res novae, are always bad.] It destroys the objective legal order in the Church. The reality of any marriage bond would be subject to self-decreed disappearance based on the personal judgment of the person involved.

[And now Fr. Murray will be accused by revolutionaries as conducting a war on mercy.] It has also been have suggested that even when the validity of the first marriage is not impugned, it would be merciful to give Holy Communion to “contrite” persons who remain in invalid second marriages. The strange notion [ut supra] that Catholics who persist in an adulterous second marriage should be able to receive Holy Communion is completely wrong. Adultery is a serious offense against God’s law.

Again, the CDF stated in 1994: “In fidelity to the words of Jesus Christ, the Church affirms that a new union cannot be recognized as valid if the preceding marriage was valid. If the divorced are remarried civilly, they find themselves in a situation that objectively contravenes God’s law. Consequently, they cannot receive Holy Communion as long as this situation persists.[Unclear in any way?]

The CDF also warned: “If these people were admitted to the Eucharist, the faithful would be led into error and confusion regarding the Church’s teaching about the indissolubility of marriage.” [Which has, in fact, happened.  There has been widespread, antinomian disobedience, And now there is widespread error and confusion even on the part of not a few of the Church’s pastors.]

So it comes down to this: misplaced charity [which isn’t actually charity] seeking to eliminate the hurt that some divorced and remarried Catholics experience in not being able to receive Holy Communion has led to insistent proposals that, if adopted, would depart from Christ’s own words, gravely offend against Catholic doctrine, and threaten the unity and peace of the Church. Let us pray for the Synod Fathers.

Super Fr. Z kudos to Fr. Murray for this clear explication of the issues.

 

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", "How To..." - Practical Notes, Fr. Z KUDOS, Mail from priests, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged , , , , , ,
31 Comments

It’s all out WAR

Anyone who isn’t insane or wicked recognizes that the insane and the wicked have been waging a war on boy and men for decades. The battle has widened into a war on gender identity. The aims are entirely evil.

Thanks to Pewsitter I saw this at Eagle Forum:

Yes, There’s a War on Boys

Many people don’t realize the peculiar ideology of the feminists. They are not promoting equality of male and female; they are for interchangeability of the genders. The feminists are at war with Mother Nature, and Mother Nature keeps winning, so the feminists are constantly angry at what they call criticize as patriarchy.
The feminists oppose competitive games where somebody wins and somebody else loses, and they manifest this peculiar ideology starting in elementary schools. The feminists don’t like games that boys like such as the game of tag. Some feminists suggest a game called “Circle of Friends,” a non-competitive version of tag, and that silliness has been implemented in a few schools. Taking winners and losers out of the game of tag and non-competitive versions of other games are supposed to make rambunctious boys in grades K-through-3rd grade less competitive and less aggressive. [How stupid is that?  Rather, how evil is that?]

The scholar Christina Hoff Sommers has written extensively on the barriers that boys face in school and college. She points out that a powerful network of feminists is working to promote training for girls to enter boys fields, and they have co-opted large sums of our tax dollars to spend lavishly to guide girls into fields dominated by boys. Here is one of one of Christina Hoff Sommers’ helpful pieces of advice: “Instead of spending millions of dollars attempting to transform aspiring cosmetologists into welders, education officials should concentrate on helping young people, male and female, to enter careers that interest them.” Right now, boys are the under-served population requiring attention. When you reflect on how boys are treated in public schools, it’s no wonder that they dislike school and have less interest in attending college. In many colleges, boys are now only about 40% of the student population.

Related to this is something from The Truth:

In Russia, Boys Learn To Use Military Equipment – In America, Boys Learn To Play Video Games And Ogle Women

The way that boys are raised in Russia is very different from how boys are raised in the United States. In Russia, boys as young as five years old are taught survival skills, learn how to use military equipment and are trained in hand to hand combat.  [Problem: Are these all boys in Russia? Is this organized now? Is this being organized?  If so…] Boys as young as twelve are taught to fire assault rifles and some of them even get to experience real paratrooper training. In the United States, on the other hand, we tend to baby our boys. They become experts in skills such as ordering fast food, playing video games and ogling women. In many cases, American boys never even learn how to act like men, and that becomes glaringly apparent once they grow up. So in the long run, which nation do you think will be better off – Russia or America?

By nature, men are hunters. We are not meant to be cooped up indoors all day long. We were created with an inner desire for adventure and activity.

The Russians understand this. In Russia, boys are raised to be strong, physical and active. There are “military sports clubs” that train young boys in the skills that I mentioned in the opening paragraph. The Daily Mail recently posted an article that examined one of these clubs known as Berkut (Golden Eagle)…

Children as young a five are sent on forced marches, given battlefield training, taught hand to hand combat, and how to use military equipment. 12 year olds are also taught how to fire Kalashnikov assault rifles and other small arms.

During the clubs regular camps, some children are given the opportunity to parachute jump during their paratrooper training.

When you were young, wouldn’t you have liked to have had the chance to do a parachute jump? [Ohhhh yes!]

I know that it would have forced me to grow up a lot faster.

[…]

Read the rest there.

The war on proper human identity is going to have deadly results.

I fear, greatly, that we are going to tear our society to pieces. The trend, as it is going now, will reduce us to sniveling, solipsistic candy-asses, defenseless whining victims, and eventually piles of corpses.

Go ahead.  Say I’m wrong.

Posted in Liberals, Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
29 Comments

Wherein Father chuckles

Over a Fr. Hunwicke’s place I read a line that made me chuckle:

Now, look here, Father, if you can’t be more pastorally sensitive and inclusive, I shall have to forbid you to say the Novus Ordo … so you’d better get your act together … or else start brushing up your Latin …

To my mind, it is supremely pastoral to remind people that Hell exists, to say “No” about a range of things, and to make sure they know the Extraordinary Form.

 

Posted in Lighter fare, Mail from priests | Tagged
8 Comments