Pres. Obama to ObamaCare comrades: “The work you’re doing is God’s work.”

This from WSJ:

President Says ObamaCare Volunteers Doing ‘God’s Work’ [?!?]
Barack Obama speaks to his old campaign comrades [That’s the right word.] at Organizing for Action.

HOLY OBAMACARE

Last night in Washington President Obama addressed the national meeting of Organizing for Action, the outfit formerly known as his re-election campaign. [If he can’t be re-elected to the White House, why is this organization still around?  For this sort of dreck.] Young OFA volunteers have been redeployed to the task of persuading Americans to sign up for new health insurance plans created by the President’s Affordable Care Act. [“Affordable”… right.  Have you lost your health care yet?] Mr. Obama urged his young fans to sign up as many people as possible before this year’s March 31 enrollment deadline. “The work you’re doing is God’s work,” he said. [I cannot express the depths of my contempt for his hypocrisy.]

The irony is particularly rich given that under a mandate issued under the Affordable Care Act, Mr. Obama is still trying to force the Little Sisters of the Poor to violate their religious beliefs. The Little Sisters are nuns who run a nonprofit nursing home and hospice and are resisting the government’s order to pay for birth control, which they oppose.

[…]

Again I call you mind the famous line in the fight between Hellman and McCarthy:

Every word [he] writes is a lie, including ‘and’ and ‘the’.

Posted in Liberals, Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, You must be joking! | Tagged , , ,
21 Comments

Benedict XVI thinks your idea is “simply absurd”

Some people are suggesting that Benedict XVI’s resignation wasn’t legal and that he is still Pope.  I wrote about that HERE.

From CNA:

Benedict XVI affirms validity of his resignation

Vatican City, Feb 26, 2014 / 03:47 am (CNA).- Today the Italian newspaper La Stampa has published excerpts of a letter from Benedict XVI, who wrote to affirm the existence of only one Pope, Francis.

“There is absolutely no doubt regarding the validity of my resignation from the Petrine ministry,” wrote Benedict XVI in a letter published on Feb. 26.

His letter was a response to La Stampa’s inquiries regarding “various interpretations that have been circulating in the press and on the web regarding his gesture,” the article noted. Some have questioned whether or not Benedict XVI’s resignation was valid, a speculation the retired Pontiff roundly rejected.

“The only condition for the validity of my resignation is the complete freedom of my decision. Speculations regarding its validity are simply absurd,” he wrote. [“asurdo speculare”]

The article’s author, Vatican expert Andrea Tornielli, described Benedict XVI’s words as “brief and to the point.”

[…]

In the meantime, I can report that the sun rose this morning and water is still… still… wet.

Posted in Benedict XVI, Throwing a Nutty, You must be joking! | Tagged , , ,
44 Comments

AG Holder to State AGs: don’t enforce laws you don’t like

A sign of the anti-nomian spirit of this age?  A sign of what liberals truly think about law and their own power?

From CBS:

Eric Holder: Discriminatory laws don’t need defending

Attorney General Eric Holder says state attorneys general are not obligated to defend laws in their states banning same sex-marriage if they don’t believe that those laws are constitutional. [So, Holder thinks it is okay to violate your oath of office and enforce laws selectively according to your personal beliefs.  That’s what Pres. Obama does, and he signs Holder’s check.]

Holder made the remarks Tuesday at a winter meeting of the National Association of Attorneys General.

He says decisions not to defend state laws should not be steeped in political disagreements [?!?] and instead “must be reserved only for exceptional circumstances.” But Holder says “we must be suspicious of legal classifications based solely on sexual orientation” and that upholding equal rights is an important principle. [Same-sex stuff is NOT… NOT a civil rights issue!  That is how it is being framed, but it is NOT a civil rights issue.  It is NOT comparable to the civil rights movement based on race from the 50’s and 60’s.]

“Any decisions – at any level – not to defend individual laws must be exceedingly rare,” Holder said. [Once is too much and once you do that, you do it again… and again…] “They must be reserved only for exceptional circumstances. And they must never stem merely from policy or political disagreements [Do you believe him?  I don’t.  No a word.] – hinging instead on firm constitutional grounds. But in general, I believe we must be suspicious of legal classifications based solely on sexual orientation.”

Democratic attorneys general in six states – Virginia, Pennsylvania, California, Illinois, Oregon and Nevada – have declined to defend same-sex marriage bans against lawsuits filed by gay couples.

From the NYT:

As an example, Mr. Holder cited the landmark Brown v. Board of Education case, which forced public school integration in 1954.

“If I were attorney general in Kansas in 1953, I would not have defended a Kansas statute that put in place separate-but-equal facilities,” Mr. Holder said. [It is NOT your call to determine which laws are good laws.  That is the role of the legislature (law makers) and courts (law interpreters.]

The nation’s first black attorney general, Mr. Holder has said he views today’s gay-rights campaigns as a continuation of the civil rights movement that won rights for black Americans in the 1950s and ’60s. He has called gay rights one of “the defining civil rights challenges of our time.”  [We must deny that premise.  It is NOT a civil rights issue.]

How does one impeach an Attorney General?

Posted in Liberals, The Coming Storm, The Drill | Tagged , ,
44 Comments

Break out the bongs! Liturgy with Deacon Sandy. VIDEO

Everyone, go your attic or garage and find that old bong you squirreled away, dust off your guitars and mistune those strings. Tie the tie-died handband on and sit down on the floor by the coffee table. This is a blast from the past…. except that it is going on today in Milwaukee.

I have had so many emails about this that I have to do something about it now.

It was my original intention to let this pass, because this is so embarrassing that the deacon involved may never live this down. This just won’t die.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFwGRX22oeo&feature=player_embedded

This embodies some of the worst old liberal cliches inflicted on the People of God from the 70’s through the 90’s.

I invite you to hum Joy is Like the Rain as you type in the combox your favorite items!

I am sure that the Fishwrappers and LCWR-types have downloaded this as a model for their liturgy workshops.

Perhaps I should drive over the Milwaukee sometime and offer to celebrate Mass for them.

Finally, I’ll bet Dcn. Sandy is a great guy! He comes through as kind and affable. I wouldn’t mind having a beer with him. It is, after all, Milwaukee.

UPDATE:

It seems that Deacon Sandy doesn’t want people to see that video.  I can understand why.

But, he doesn’t get off scott free.  HERE

And I received this email:

Here’s a version that will not be removed: HERE

 

Posted in Liberals, Lighter fare | Tagged ,
123 Comments

ASK FATHER: “Have a nice day!”, after the final blessing at Mass.

Si tacuisset, philosophus mansisset.

From a reader:

Is it licit for a priest to say “Have a nice day” after the final blessing?

When the Mass is over, priests and bishops can utter any banal cliché that pops into their distracted heads and not technically violate the rubrics.

Violating custom and good taste is another thing.

But we must ask: When does Mass end?

I checked quickly in the Novus Ordo’s General Instruction of the Roman Missal in the Concluding Rites to see whether or not the exit procession, recessional, is described or prescribed.  The relevant bits I found were:

D) The Concluding Rites

90. To the Concluding Rites belong the following: […]

d) the kissing of the altar by the Priest and the Deacon, followed by a profound bow to the altar by the Priest, the Deacon, and the other ministers.

That sounds like Mass ends the moment the celebrant kisses the altar.  But also:

186. Then, together with the priest, the deacon venerates the altar with a kiss, makes a profound bow, and departs in a manner similar to the procession beforehand.

It seems that, in the Novus Ordo, the exit procession, recessional, is part of the rites of the Mass.

When the exit procession concludes (there should be a moment that defines the conclusion, as there always was in the sacristy when everyone would bow to the Cross and the priest would bless the servers) then the priest can violate good taste all he wants.

Therefore, priests should eschew rubric-violating outbursts of logorrhea at the altar.  Decorum and custom require a dignified exit by the sacred ministers (hopefully with a minimum of grinning, waving, winking, and hand pumping), and a respectful silent waiting on the part of the laity until said clerics have once again drawn themselves apart (please, God, to the sacristy).

Let the rag chewing and back slapping occur amid the coffee and doughnuts in the church hall.

Have an adequate day and try not to sin.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged ,
30 Comments

Bp. Morlino on EWTN on current burning questions

His Excellency Most Reverend Robert C. Morlino of the Diocese of Madison (aka “The Extraordinary Ordinary”) appeared with Raymond Arroyo on EWTN and spoke about a range of issues, contraception, divorce-remarriage, “pastoral approach”, Pope Francis’ video to Pentecostals, Francis’ alleged negative comments about the TLM.

He makes an interesting observation about the Holy Father speaking “whence he comes”, that is, being pastoral has the emphasis because there isn’t a wide-spread defiance of the Church’s teachings.  That’s not the case everywhere.  But the only authentically “pastoral” must include the truth presented with love.  It is not pastoral to help people avoid carrying the Cross.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Francis, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
12 Comments

Archbp. Predergast restricts eulogies at funerals.

Archbp. Prendergast

Do you remember that a couple years about Bp. Robert C. Morlino banned eulogies in the Diocese of Madison?  HERE Some people nearly lost their minds.  Morlino was only being a “good son of the Church”, as Pope Francis describes himself, and therefore faithful to the Church’s laws and liturgical rubrics.

Sometimes, in this antinomian age of ours, it shocks people to realize that bishops and priests are not free to disobey the Church’s laws.

From RNS:

Canadian archbishop bans eulogies at funeral Masses [Thanks be to God.]

TORONTO (RNS) Roman Catholics in Ottawa are no longer permitted to deliver eulogies during funeral Masses, the local archbishop has decreed. [Rather than write, “Contrary to the Church’s law, eulogies have been given…”. ]

The Feb. 2 decree from Archbishop Terrence Prendergast reminds the faithful that Catholics gather at funerals “not to praise the deceased, but to pray for them.”

Contrary to popular belief, eulogies “are not part of the Catholic funeral rites, particularly in the context of a funeral liturgy within Mass,” the decree stated. Many Catholics, it pointed out, do not know this.

Priests are “strongly” urged to encourage Catholics to speak publicly about loved ones outside the Mass — at funeral homes, receptions, or in a parish hall. [The problem is not just eulogies by priests, but by laypeople, which are often a train wreck.]

In an interview with the Canadian Broadcasting Corp., Prendergast conceded that eulogies at Catholic funerals “had crept in” but that “technically, the books that guide us don’t allow them.”

Eulogies are “words of praise without reference to God,” he stated, while a Mass “is an act of faith.”

However, Prendergast said the church was facing increasing pressure from families to have more, and even multiple, eulogies at funerals.  [Once major abuses creep in, there is no end to them.]

To that end, a compromise was reached: The decree permits “words of remembrance” to be delivered, but with three conditions: They must be spoken at the beginning of the liturgy; [This is unclear: before Mass?] must be one page of text taking three to four minutes to read, with mention of the deceased’s “life of faith”; and they should be read from a place other than where Scriptures are recited.

Prendergast said Catholics have lost the “sense of the importance of the funeral Mass, that we pray for the person. [No no no.  We celebrate their lives!  By telling off-color stories and maybe opening a can of beer and releasing balloons!] Most people when they go, they canonize the person. I hope they won’t say that about me because I know I’m only going to get into heaven with the prayers of the faithful.”

Elsewhere in Canada, a similar situation arose in 2003, when the bishop of Calgary, Fred Henry, issued a pastoral letter banning eulogies at Catholic funeral Masses.

Fr. Z kudos to Archbp. Prendergast!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Picture Me In My Grief | Tagged , , , ,
63 Comments

ASK FATHER: Priest’s “Bug Out Bag” for TEOTWAWKI

It’ll “take care of us”, alright!

From a reader:

What items should a Catholic include in a bug out bag [BOB] besides the usual survival gear?

What does a Priest’s bug out bag look like? I would assume supplies to administer the sacraments in an emergency.

Good question.  I will confine myself mostly to a priest’s BOB.  That said, every lay person should have a Rosary: ideally one made from paracord, which will not be reflective and will not make noise when moved (tip from a Marine).  Also, one of those tiny, vest-pocket size New Testament and Psalms volumes could be of comfort.  There is a small Catholic edition by Baronius, very nice, leather bound that weighs 1.2 oz.

Since I have looked at this question for a while, I can offer some suggestions.

First, let’s distinguish between scenarios.

There is a short term, localized disaster flight/coping BOB.  I don’t think we need to say much about that, other than to say that a priest ought to have with him at all times – SHTF or not – his oil stock and a stole and, if he doesn’t have them memorized, a useful prayerbook like the Collectio Rituum or one of those handy and slim volumes of yesteryear  – which I hope some company like Baronius would reprint – like the old Vademecum Pii Sacerdotis.  In the mag pouch of my daily wear 5.11s I have a stole and oil stock, my Rosary and folding knife in the other thigh pocket. In the short-term, the localized case, the next town over ought to be able to provide things for Mass, etc.  But before they arrive, make sure you have that oil-stock!

Next, if you are talking about when the SHTF on a large or global scale and TEOTWAWKI.  I will leave aside the vehicle issue.

Initially, what you bring in your head might make a difference and doesn’t weigh anything.  I recall in Fr. Walter Ciszek’s With God In Russia that the Jesuits who were sent into the Soviet Union memorized certain prayers.  Ciszek could substitute some prayers for the Office and could say Mass from memory, on his suitcase or on the stump of a tree.  We should know forms for the administration of sacraments and giving certain blessings (ad omnia).  Fathers, do you know the form to anoint from memory? The Apostolic Blessing?  It could be good to know a Mass formulary from memory, perhaps the Votive Mass of the Blessed Virgin Mary along with all the prayers for Mass, offertory, Roman Canon, everything.  You won’t be hauling a Missal around for very long, I fear.  I have a photo-charging wristwatch, which has a calendar feature, so I am good to go.

Alternately, a little flexible solar panel charger for your iPhone or Kindle with useful texts could be really helpful: there are PDF’s of many liturgical books, not to mention spiritual reading.  They can break, however.  Therefore, memorize the essentials and they are yours until your mind breaks in the prison-camp during the usual tortures.

A tiny chalice from one of those portable Mass kits would be nice, though during TEOTWAWKI I won’t be fussy.  A water-proof container with small hosts (which can be broken for efficiency). A plastic squirt bottle of fortified wine (see HERE).  It could be a good idea to have a small vacuum sealed bag of raisins, from which wine could be made in a pinch once if you are holed-up somewhere.  Another of wheat-flour. (Ecclesiastical authorities might consider stockpiling sealed cans of raisins and sugar and wheat flour and olive oil.)  I have a vestment that was probably for a military chaplain, white and red reversible.  When the SHTF, I doubt God will frown on the use of a stole only… or no stole at all. During TEOTWAWKI a vestment is therefore not my first concern… a maniple, maybe, maybe a biretta… no, scratch that… Beretta.

Moreover, small vials of your oils.  If you can only have one, then obviously choose Infirmorum. As a spiritual help, your Chrism could be a real treasure. During an ordination I heard the great Bp. Morlino of Madison suggest to the ordinandi that, when times are tough in their priesthood, to rub a drop of Chrism between the palms of their hands for strength: the fragrance is a powerful reminder of their identity.  During TEOTWAWKI we mustn’t lose our identity.  At the same time, you would have to be pretty sure that there wasn’t an enemy nearby, since Chrism is pretty potent.  If they are closing in and not to be avoided, then Chrism away.

You should be carrying some salt anyway, so you will be able to bless Holy Water.

So, aside from the things that everyone else should have in their BOB, the priest needs a few extras.  Taken together, they don’t add much weight, but they carry a lot of spiritual weight.  That said, in the case of capture, you would instantly be identifiable as a priest.  Martyrdom to follow.

Unless you are discovered by a group of Catholic preppers!

So, you Catholics out there!  Network and plan and include a priest in both networking and planning.  If you are creating bug-out plans, don’t forget Father or even some useful bishop or other if he is willing: the ailing Augustine, waiting for the Vandals, was not willing to leave Hippo in 430. A bishop can consecrate another bishop if need be.  When TEOTWAWKI comes, there will be need.

Building retreats? Consider a chapel or at least the basic materials.  Consult a priest for what is needed.

Perhaps even a priest-hole.

And don’t forget those …

[CUE MUSIC]

… 5 pound bags of Mystic Monk Coffee!

When TEOTWAWKI comes and that S is Hing TF, what else should you be sure to put in that Bug Out Bag but a dozen 5 pound bags of those deliciously roasted beans.

The infrastructure will be gone.  The riots will be raging in the former city centers.  They’ll be hunting you down. But you’ll kick back with one of your Fr Z swag mugs before your fire, savoring that rich flavor while your lightly-killed rabbit turns on its spit at your hide-away.

Remember, each bean will be like gold.   You’ll be able to trade them for ammo, anti-biotics and even bribe Obama’s Domestic Security Total Statist Control Fugitive Hunter Death Squad Forces to let you go!

I have it on good authority that Mystic Monk coffee is endowed with special powers through rites I cannot here explain that actually mask… yes, actually mask!… your identity and presence against drones and satellites.

Mystic Monk Coffee can do all that!

It’s swell and it’s a matter of LIFE AND DEATH!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Global Killer Asteroid Questions, GO TO CONFESSION, Mail from priests, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, Semper Paratus, TEOTWAWKI, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,
55 Comments

Pope Francis creates financial watchdog dicastery headed by Card. Pell: Secretariat for the Economy

His Eminence George Card. Pell

Behold the genesis of the SE.

My spidey-sense tells me that this new structure could be a strong counter-balance to the power of the Secretariat of State, which Paul VI put on steroids and developed into the Curia’s hyper-dicastery (which ought to belong more to the CDF).

From the Holy See Press Office:

PRESS RELEASE: NEW COORDINATION STRUCTURE FOR ECONOMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE AFFAIRS
OF THE HOLY SEE AND THE VATICAN STATE

The Holy Father today announced a new coordination structure for economic and administrative affairs of the Holy See and the Vatican State.

Today’s announcement comes after the recommendations of the rigorous review conducted by the Pontifical Commission for Reference on the Organization of the Economic- Administrative Structure of the Holy See (COSEA) were considered and endorsed by both the Council of 8 Cardinals established to advise the Holy Father on governance and the Committee of 15 Cardinals which oversees the financial affairs of the Holy See. [You need either thread or bread-crumbs to follow that line.]

COSEA recommended changes to simplify and consolidate existing management structures and improve coordination and oversight across the Holy See and Vatican City State. [Two entities.] COSEA also recommended more formal commitment to adopting accounting standards and generally accepted financial management and reporting practices as well as enhanced internal controls, transparency and governance.

The changes will enable more formal involvement of senior and experienced experts in financial administration, planning and reporting and will ensure better use of resources, improving the support available for various programs, particularly our works with the poor and marginalized. [That’s probably code for the “Vatican Bank”, Istituto per le Opere di Religione.]

The changes announced by the Holy Father include:

1. Establishment of a new Secretariat for the Economy which will have authority over all economic and administrative activities within the Holy See and the Vatican City State. [In other words, if it spends or receives money, this thing is in control.  As I was saying: counterbalance.] The Secretariat will be responsible, among other things, for preparing an annual budget for the Holy See and Vatican City State as well as financial planning and various support functions such as human resources and procurement. [Hiring and buying stuff, which could put a damper on theft of material and resale outside SCV.] The Secretariat will also be required to prepare detailed financial statements of the Holy See and Vatican State.  [This will also diminish somewhat the Governatorato.]

2. The Secretariat for the Economy will implement policies determined by a new Council for the Economy – a 15 member Council comprised of 8 Cardinals or Bishops, reflecting various parts of the world and seven lay experts of different nationalities with strong professional financial experience. The Council will meet on a regular basis and to consider policies and practices and to prepare and analyze reports on the economic-administrative activities of the Holy See.

3. The Secretariat for the Economy will be headed by a Cardinal Prefect reporting to the Council for the Economy. [And this guy will have clout.] He will be supported by a Secretary-General in the management of day to day activities.

4. The Holy Father has appointed Cardinal Pell, the current Archbishop of Sydney, Australia, to the role of Prefect of the Secretariat for the Economy. […]

5. New arrangements also include the appointment of an Auditor-General, appointed by the Holy Father who will be empowered to conduct audits of any agency of the Holy See and Vatican City State at any time.

6. The changes will confirm the role of APSA as the Central bank of the Vatican with all the obligations and responsibilities of similar institutions around the world.

7. The AIF will continue to undertake its current and critical role of prudential supervision and regulation of activities within the Holy See and Vatican City State.

The Prefect of the new Secretariat for the Economy has been asked to start work as soon as possible. He will prepare the final statutes and other related matters with the assistance of any necessary advisors and will work with COSEA to complete the implementation of these changes approved by the Holy Father.

[…]

Cardinal Pell, of Sydney, has been a member of Vox Clara and was instrumental in the development of the new, corrected English translation of the Novus Ordo.  He has been more recently a member of the Gang of Eight.

I foresee problems with this.

For example, I don’t know what a “secretariat” is or how if figures into the structure of the Curia.  Also, is there actual law that goes with this?  What is going to happen?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Francis | Tagged ,
22 Comments

Card. Burke explains what Pope Francis is up to.

In English for L’Osservatore Romano (the Vatican’s “daily”), Raymond Card. Burke writes of The Francis Effect:

American Cardinal on the message of this Pontificate The Pope’s radical call to the new evangelization

During a recent visit to the United States, I was repeatedly impressed by how deeply Pope Francis has penetrated the national conversation on a whole range of issues. His special gift of expressing direct care for each and all has resonated strongly with many in my homeland.

At the same time, I noted a certain questioning about whether Pope Francis has altered or is about to alter the Church’s teaching on a number of the critical moral issues of our time, [I get a lot of this. A stewardess on a flight the other day gave me that song and dance.] for example, the teaching on the inviolable dignity of innocent human life, and the integrity of marriage and the family. Those who questioned me in the matter were surprised to learn that the Holy Father has in fact affirmed the unchanging and unchangeable truths of the Church’s teaching on these very questions. They had developed a quite different impression as a result of the popular presentation [read: mainstream media] of Pope Francis and his views.

Clearly, the words and actions of the Holy Father require, on our part, a fitting tool of interpretation, [read: hermeneutic] if we are to understand correctly what he intends to teach. My friend and colleague at the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, Cardinal Renato Raffaele Martino, put it this way in a recent article in this newspaper: “The Holy Father instructs with his words, but effectively teaches through his actions. This is his uniqueness and his magnetism” (L’Osservatore Romano, English edition, [ore] 13 December 2013, p. 7). In other words, Pope Francis is exercising strongly his gift for drawing near to all people of good will. It is said that when he manifests his care for a single person, as he does so generously whenever the occasion presents itself, all understand that he has the same care for each of them.

With regard to his manner of addressing the critical issues, the Holy Father himself has described his approach, when he stated: “We cannot insist only [get that?] on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of contraceptive methods…. I have not spoken much about these things, and I was reprimanded for that. But when we speak about these issues, we have to talk about them in a context. The teaching of the Church, for that matter, is clear and I am a son of the Church, but it is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time” (“The Pope’s Interview”, [TBI™] ore, 25 September 2013, p. 14). In other words, the Holy Father wants, first, to convey his love of all people so that his teaching on the critical moral questions may be received in that context. [When Francis uttered the infamous “Who am I to judge?”, it was in a context.  HERE] But his approach cannot change the duty of the Church and her shepherds to teach clearly and insistently about the most fundamental moral questions of our time. I think, for instance, of the Holy Father’s words to the participants in the second annual March for Life in Rome on 12 May of last year, or of his Twitter message to the participants in the annual March for Life in Washington, D.C., on 22 January.

[…]

In a similar way, Pope Francis has reaffirmed the Church’s perennial teaching on the indissolubility of marriage, [get that?] as well as the practical importance of the Church’s canonical discipline in seeking the truth regarding the claim of the nullity of a marriage. I think in particular of his words to the Plenary Assembly of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura: “It is always necessary to keep in mind the effective connection between the action of the Church which evangelizes and the action of the Church which administers justice. The service of justice is an undertaking of the apostolic life…. I encourage all of you to persevere in the pursuit of a clear and upright exercise of justice in the Church, in response to the legitimate desires that the faithful address to their Pastors, especially when they trustingly request that their own status be authoritatively clarified” (ore, 15 November 2013, p. 8).

[So, Your Eminence, what is Francis doing?] Pope Francis has clearly reaffirmed the Church’s moral teaching, in accord with her unbroken tradition. What, then, does he want us to understand about his pastoral approach in general? It seems to me that he first wishes to have people set aside every obstacle which they imagine to prevent them from responding with faith. He wants, above all, that they see Christ and receive His personal invitation to be one with Him in the Church.

The Holy Father, it seems to me, wishes to pare back every conceivable obstacle people may have invented to prevent themselves from responding to Jesus Christ’s universal call to holiness. We all know individuals who say things like: “Oh, I stopped going to Church because of the Church’s teaching on divorce”, or “I could never be Catholic because of the Church’s teaching on abortion or on homosexuality”. The Holy Father is asking them to put aside these obstacles and to welcome Christ, without any excuse, into their lives. Once they come to understand the immeasurable love of Christ, alive for us in the Church, they will be able to resolve whatever has been troubling them about the Church, His Mystical Body, and her teaching.

[…]

Read the rest of Card. Burke’s explanation over there.

Fr. Z kudos to Card Burke, who has also engaged in talking people down of the ledge.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Francis, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, What are they REALLY saying? | Tagged , , , , , ,
19 Comments