Gain Plenary Indulgences on 31 Dec and 1 Jan

We should develop the good habit of gaining indulgences. Holy Church provides many opportunities to gain these spiritual gifts from the treasure of the merits of Christ and the saints.

Keep in mind that in addition to the work to be performed, you should rouse in yourself a true sense of sorrow for and detachment from any sins.  Be sure you will have made a good confession and received Communion within about 20 days.

Today, 31 December, you can gain a plenary indulgence by reciting the Te Deum.  A plenary indulgence is gained for reciting the Te Deum on the last day of the year. On other days of the year, the indulgence is partial.  You can recite it in Latin or the vernacular.

Tomorrow, 1 January, you can gain a plenary indulgence by reciting the prayer Veni, Creator Spiritus.  On other days, the indulgence is partial.

Easy, no?

I’ll make this easier still.

For the Te Deum, click HERE

For the Veni Creator click HERE

Indulgences!  A spiritual work of mercy for others and good for your own soul too.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Just Too Cool, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , ,
18 Comments

Pope Francis ‘shocked’ by ‘gay’ adoption, urges bishop to speak against it, boldly

From CNSNEWS… I am posting this here because you won’t see it at the National Schismatic Reporter (aka Fishwrap).

Hey! We are still in the Octave of Christmas!

My emphases and comments:

Bishop: Pope ‘Shocked’ By Gay Adoption, ‘Encouraged Me to Speak Out’ [You might ask how it is possible for the Pope to be “shocked”, as if he hadn’t heard of this before. Where was the Nuncio? Why hadn’t the Pope been informed?]

(CNSNews.com) – Pope Francis is “shocked” about legislation in Malta that would allow homosexual couples to adopt children and encouraged the auxiliary bishop of that island nation, Charles J. Scicluna, to “speak out” against the proposal, the bishop told the Sunday Times of Malta on Dec. 29.  [Not exactly the Card. Bernardin “seamless garment” approach, is it!]

In his Christmas Day sermon, Bishop Scicluna [Remember him?  He was hugely acclaimed for sharpening the CDF’s responses in the matter of abuse of children.  This is a tough, direct, straight-shooter.] had defended the Catholic Church’s teaching against same-sex “marriage” and gay adoption. When asked why he would discuss such a topic as part of a Christmas homily, Bishop Scicluna said he had met with Pope Francis on Dec. 12 and the pope advised him to speak boldly on the subject. [¡Vaya lío!]

“We discussed many aspects,” said Bishop Scicluna. “And when I raised the issue that’s worrying me as a bishop [gay adoption], he encouraged me to speak out.”

“[T]hat is exactly what I did in my Christmas sermon,” said Bishop Scicluna. “My sermon was not about the rights of gay people but about children’s rights.”

[…]

Pope Francis, as the archbishop of Buenos Aires and Primate of Argentina, said in July 2010 that same-sex marriage and adoption of children by gays will “seriously harm the family.

[…]

Cardinal Bergoglio also said, “Let us not be naive: this is not simply a political struggle, but it is an attempt to destroy God’s plan. It is not just a bill but a ‘move’ of the Father of Lies [Satan] who seeks to confuse and deceive the children of God.”  [B-b-b-b-but Pope Fluffy!  Wh-who are we to judge?  Friends, I have been saying it all along. When you set aside the home-spun, off-the cuff stuff, Pope Francis is as hard as nails when it comes to moral and doctrinal issues.  The catholic Left is going to turn on Pope Francis one of these days.]

[…]

A pattern is emerging.  Remember that recently the Pope affirmed to Card. Meisner that there will not be Communion for the divorced and remarried.

“But Father! But Father!”, I can hear some of you say, “What is the Pope doing here?  Why does he seem to say one thing and then he says something like this?  What’s going on?”

I think that Francis wants bishops to recover their episcopal backbones and speak boldly in their dioceses about these issues and not just rely on the Pope do the heavy lifting from Rome.  Francis is possibly trying to stiffen episcopal spines and to make the the papal spine a little less of a lightening rod.

UPDATE 1 Jan 2014 0608 GMT:

Still nothing from the Fishwrap about Malta!

MALTA WATCH!  DAY 1

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, "But Father! But Father!", Fr. Z KUDOS, Francis, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Just Too Cool, Liberals, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Sin That Cries To Heaven | Tagged , , , , ,
67 Comments

A Christmas gift I didn’t get!

Because of my long involvement with the über-ultra-hyper secret Vatican Vampire Assassin Squad (and I can’t tell you who is assassinating whom!), I was intrigued by the photo sent me by a priest friend of a vampire hunters kit!

Posted in Just Too Cool, Lighter fare | Tagged ,
15 Comments

A TV commercial for your consideration: POLL

An Argentinian Coca-Cola commercial for your consideration.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Let’s have a poll!

Pick your best answer and discuss (if registered and approved) in the combox, below.

If you vote “Stupendous!” or “Blech!”, you had better explain yourselves!

My reaction to the Cola Cola commercial, is best characterized on a scale as:

View Results

Posted in POLLS, The Drill | Tagged , ,
58 Comments

ASK FATHER: Father coughed so I didn’t go to Communion.

From a reader.

QUAERITUR:

Shortly before the consecration on Sunday, the priest had a fit of coughing, and coughed into his right hand. What should he have done? I was worried about the transmission of germs, and did not go to communion.

That’s your choice.  That’s an option.

You are not obliged to receive Communion at every Mass.  You are obliged to confess all your mortal sins in kind and number and receive Communion once a year.

As far as priests are concerned… priests, like human beings… no, wait!… they are human beings, sometimes do things like this, cover with the hand when coughing, unconsciously.  I supposed he could have turned his head hard about over this shoulder, or turned away from the altar and then coughed with out covering up.  Good heavens.  What could he have done?  What can you do when your hands are occupied with something.  Say you are involved in food preparation or serving and you are holding the Christmas goose on a platter – in both hands with hot pads – and leaning in so people can help themselves.  Coughs and sneezes can sneak up, right?

Father, however, can’t just leave the sanctuary and go wash his hands. It could be helpful to have some kind of hand purifier around – yes, even at the altar.   I have done that before, even when I had a cough but knew I wasn’t contagious.

On the other hand, and allow me to think out of the box for a moment, would it be possible these days for this to take place?  Father comes out of the sacristy and says, “Folks, I am really ill today.  I think I am contagious.  I will say Mass, but no qualified ministers of Communion present. I won’t be distributing Holy Communion.  FYI”, and then see the congregation not freak out?

In any event, if you don’t want to go to Communion because Father coughed, fine!  Good choice!

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
39 Comments

Devolution of power to regional Churches? I think not.

There is a fear among some people with whom I converse that Pope Francis might undercut Roman curial congregations and devolve authority to regional conferences of bishops.

I am all for subsidiarity.  That said, some things just don’t work well at the local level.  Let’s consider the role in the Church of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, for example.  I would be delighted were regional conferences able to get their act together and do more of what the CDF does.  But… that’s unlikely to happen, as recent history has aptly demonstrated.

Assuming that all of you have have reviewed the important 1998 document of John Paul II Apostolic suos, there is something at Kathweb about comments that the present Prefect of the CDF made concerning Francis and such a devolution.

The prefect of the Vatican Congregation for Doctrine of the Faith, Archbishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller, took a stand against a decentralizing of the Church to the level of the national bishop conferences. “The Catholic Church is made up of local churches, but it is one,” said the Prefect for the Italian daily newspaper Corriere della sera: [And, as usual, I can’t find that piece, since CdS has perhaps the worse search interface anywhere.  Maybe one of you can find it.] “There are no ‘national’ churches.”

The Presidents of the Episcopal Conferences are “coordinators, not Vice-Popes” stressed the Vatican’s defender of the Faith.

Pope Francis can’t simply wave aside Apostolos suos.  It is a theological document, and not just disciplinary.  It isn’t in itself as a document definitive credendum, but it contains affirmations that are (cf Lumen gentium).  It is not to be trifled with.  Müller said succinctly what the dogmatic issues are.  Let me crack this open for low-information liberals.

The Catholic Church involves a Communion of local Churches, but it is not merely a communion of Churches.  It is one Church.  Lumen gentium makes this point.  More?  Okay.  Local Churches are in communion with each other and with the Successor of Peter and the Church of Rome.  However, they aren’t just in communion with the Vicar of Christ and the Church of Rome insofar as they are in a communion of Churches.  Tracking? There’s more.  Every single local Church is itself also, on its own, in communion with the Successor of Peter and the Church of Rome.

The communion of local Churches, as a communion and as individual local Churches demands the primacy of the Successor of Peter and the Church of Rome over all the others.

Furthermore, the CDF must be beefed up, not slimmed down.  So too the local Churches should exercise greater oversight of all aspects of the life of the Church on the local level.  Take care of business before Rome has to get involved!  Be swift, clear and, please God, competent!

Lastly, former Father Greg Reynolds of Australia is still excommunicated.

Posted in Francis, The Drill | Tagged , , , ,
30 Comments

JUST TOO COOL – UK: Priest buys lost Van Dyck for £400

You just never know what you might have in your attic or find in a shop.

From Express:

Antiques Roadshow discovery: Van Dyck masterpiece bought for just £400 is worth £400,000

A PORTRAIT bought for £400 has been revealed as a long-lost van Dyck, worth at least £400,000 after examination at the Antiques Roadshow.

Father Jamie McLeod, a Catholic priest, brought the painting to the show after it was originally purchased in a Cheshire ­antiques shop, with no mention of the 17th century painter.

It was correctly identified as a masterpiece after the show’s host, Fiona Bruce, saw it and thought it might be genuine.

She had been making a show about van Dyck with art expert Philip Mould and it seemed to her to be remarkably similar in style to the ones she had seen featured in the programme.

After the roadshow, held at Newstead ­Abbey in Nottinghamshire, Mr Mould agreed to look at it. Following a lengthy restoration process, the painting was verified as a van Dyck by Dr Christopher Brown, one of the world’s authorities on the artist. The portrait, which is the most valuable to be identified in the 34-year history of the Antiques Roadshow, will now be sold to raise funds for new church bells.

Father McLeod, who runs a retreat house in the Peak District, said: “This has been an emotional experience and is such great news. It’s wonderful that new church bells, hopefully, will be pealing out to commemorate the centenary of the First World War in 2018.” Sir Anthony van Dyck was the leading court painter for King Charles I and is regarded as one of the great masters of the 17th century.

 

Posted in Just Too Cool, Mail from priests | Tagged , ,
10 Comments

Not exactly RCIA and sharing your feelings

With a biretta tip to St. Louis Catholic, who did a good job with this, we should review what we believe as faithful Catholics.

This is the formula that I used when I was admitted to Holy Church as a convert, though I did it in Latin.  We did this at Vespers on the 4th Sunday of Advent.

The “Professio fidei Tridentina”, also known as the “Creed of Pope Pius IV”, is one of the four authoritative Creeds of the Catholic Church. [Can you name the other 3?] It was issued on November 13, 1565 by Pope Pius IV in his bull “Iniunctum nobis” under the auspices of the Council of Trent (1545 – 1563). It was subsequently modified slightly after the First Vatican Council (1869 – 1870) to bring it inline with the dogmatic definitions of the Council. The major intent of the Creed was to clearly define the Catholic faith against Protestantism. At one time it was used by Theologians as an oath of loyalty to the Church and to reconcile converts to the Church, but it is rarely used these days.

____

I, N, with a firm faith believe and profess each and everything which is contained in the Creed which the Holy Roman Church maketh use of. To wit:

I believe in one God, The Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the Only-begotten Son of God. Born of the Father before all ages. God of God, Light of Light, true God of true God. Begotten, not made, of one substance with the Father. By whom all things were made. Who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven. And became incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the Virgin Mary: and was made man. He was also crucified for us, suffered under Pontius Pilate, and was buried. And on the third day He rose again according to the Scriptures. He ascended into heaven and sits at the right hand of the Father. He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead and His kingdom will have no end. And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of life, Who proceeds from the Father and the Son. Who together with the Father and the Son is adored and glorified, and who spoke through the prophets. And one holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. I confess one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and I await the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. Amen.

The Apostolic and Ecclesiastical traditions and all other observances and constitutions of that same Church I firmly admit to and embrace.

I also accept the Holy Scripture according to that sense which holy mother the Church hath held, and doth hold, and to whom it belongeth to judge the true sense and interpretations of the Scriptures. Neither will I ever take and interpret them otherwise than according to the unanimous consent of the Fathers.

I also profess that there are truly and properly Seven Sacraments of the New Law, instituted by Jesus Christ our Lord, and necessary for the salvation of mankind, though not all are necessary for everyone; to wit, Baptism, Confirmation, Eucharist, Penance, Extreme Unction, Holy Orders, and Matrimony; and that they confer grace; and that of these, Baptism, Confirmation, and Holy Orders cannot be repeated without sacrilege. I also receive and admit the accepted and approved ceremonies of the Catholic Church in the solemn administration of the aforesaid sacraments.

I embrace and accept each and everything which has been defined and declared in the holy Council of Trent concerning original sin and justification.

I profess, likewise, that in the Mass there is offered to God a true, proper, and propitiatory sacrifice for the living and the dead; and that in the most holy sacrament of the Eucharist there is truly, really, and substantially, the Body and Blood, together with the soul and divinity, of our Lord Jesus Christ; and that a conversion takes place of the whole substance of the bread into the Body, and of the whole substance of the wine into the Blood, which conversion the Catholic Church calls Transubstantiation. I also confess that under either species alone Christ is received whole and entire, and a true sacrament.

I steadfastly hold that there is a Purgatory, and that the souls therein detained are helped by the suffrages of the faithful. Likewise, that the saints, reigning together with Christ, are to be honored and invoked, and that they offer prayers to God for us, and that their relics are to be venerated. I most firmly assert that the images of Christ, of the Mother of God, ever virgin, and also of other Saints, ought to be kept and retained, and that due honor and veneration is to be given them.

I also affirm that the power of indulgences was left by Christ in the Church, and that the use of them is most wholesome to Christian people.

I acknowledge the Holy Catholic Apostolic Roman Church as the mother and teacher of all churches; and I promise true obedience to the Bishop of Rome, successor to St. Peter, Prince of the Apostles, and Vicar of Jesus Christ.

I likewise undoubtedly receive and profess all other things delivered, defined, and declared by the sacred Canons, and general Councils, and particularly by the holy Council of Trent, and by the ecumenical Council of the Vatican, particularly concerning the primacy of the Roman Pontiff and his infallible teaching. I condemn, reject, and anathematize all things contrary thereto, and all heresies which the Church hath condemned, rejected, and anathematized.

This true Catholic faith, outside of which no one can be saved, which I now freely profess and to which I truly adhere, I do so profess and swear to maintain inviolate and with firm constancy with the help of God until the last breath of life. And I shall strive, as far as possible, that this same faith shall be held, taught, and professed by all those over whom I have charge. I N. do so pledge, promise, and swear, so help me God and these Holy Gospels of God.

Somewhat more that most RCIA demands.

I am picturing Fishwrappers flinching at every paragraph.

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liberals, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , ,
43 Comments

We’ll always have Paris

I was sent a link to an interesting site, which shows what once happened in a certain place, then and now.  HERE

 

Posted in Just Too Cool |
10 Comments

Obama’s V.A. hospital forbids Christmas cards made by children for wounded vets

More BAH! HUMBUG! from Pres. Obama’s Veteran’s Administration.  First, they ban Christmas carols.  Now, they ban cards made by children.

From FNC (where there is also video):

Boys and girls at Grace Academy in Prosper, Tex., spent most of last Friday making homemade Christmas cards for bedridden veterans at the VA hospital in Dallas.
Fourth-grader Gracie Brown was especially proud of her card, hoping it would “make their day because their family might live far away, and they might not have somebody to celebrate Christmas with.
“I’d like them to know they’ve not been forgotten and somebody wanted to say thank you,” Gracie told
Gracie’s card read, “Merry Christmas. Thank you for your service.” It also included an American flag.
But the bedridden veterans at the VA hospital will never get to see Gracie’s card. Nor will they see the cards made by 51 other students. [Get this…] That’s because the Christmas cards violated VA policy.
“It really didn’t occur to me there would be a problem with distributing Christmas cards,” said Susan Chapman, a math teacher at the academy. [Nor would most normal people think that children’s cards for Christmas were double-plus-ungood in the eyes of the Obama Administration.] She’s married to a veteran and volunteers with the American Legion and other veterans’ organizations.
On Monday morning the boys and girls were planning on hand delivering the cards to the wounded veterans. [I’ll be the vets would have liked that.] Chapman called the hospital to make final arrangements and that’s when she learned there was a problem.
“I told him my students made cards, we’d like to bring them down for the veterans,” Chapman told the television station. “And he said, ‘That’s great. We’re thrilled to have them, except the only thing is, we can’t accept anything that says ‘Merry Christmas’ or ‘God bless you’ or any scriptural references because of all the red tape.’[VA: GOD NOT ALLOWED.]
A VA official quoted the policy which is in the Veterans Health Administration handbook:
“In order to be respectful of our veterans’ religious beliefs, all donated holiday cards are reviewed by a multi-disciplinary team of staff led by chaplaincy services and determined if they are appropriate (non-religious) to freely distribute to patients. We regret this process was not fully explained to this group and apologize for any misunderstanding.”
Hiram Sasser, director of litigation for Liberty Institute, said it was a new low “even for the Scrooges and Grinches at the VA.”
Targeting the benevolent work of little children for censorship is disgusting,” Sasser told me. “Do the Grinches in the administration of the VA really believe our bravest warriors need protection from the heartfelt well wishes of small children saying Merry Christmas?” [No, its the Obama mandarins who cannot bear that any views smacking of religion be permitted in the public square.  This is all of a piece.]
Andrea Brown, Gracie’s mom, was dumbfounded by the news.
This wasn’t the country I grew up in, when you couldn’t say ‘Merry Christmas,’ you couldn’t say ‘God bless you’ or reference any scripture,” she told MyFoxDFW.com.
She told the television station the boys and girls were heartbroken that the military personnel would not be able to receive their cards.
“They couldn’t believe the people that these people they wanted to honor weren’t going to get the chance to see what they had done,” she said.
The cards will not be thrown away — they are being shipped to Brook Army Medical Center in San Antonio and to a private facility for veterans in Louisiana.
Sasser said at some point, “does the VA have no shame?”
“Mr. Potter from ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ wouldn’t even ban little children from wishing our veterans Merry Christmas,” Sasser said.  [But this is Mr. Obama’s VA.]

Disgusting.

Posted in Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, Pò sì jiù, Religious Liberty, You must be joking! | Tagged , ,
37 Comments