Plenary Indulgences for particular days by Fr. F

I highly recommend a blog post on indulgences by my good friend, His Hermeneuticalness, the great Dean of Bexley and p.p. of Blackfen, the unabashedly Unreconstructed Ossified Manualist, Fr. Tim Finigan.  HERE

A sample with my emphases and comments:

[…]

[T]there are many plenary indulgences given for particular occasions. Although I have reservations about some of the practical reforms Pope Paul VI carried out, his Apostolic Constitution Indulgentiarum Doctrina is a superb theological and spiritual exposition of indulgences. It is not difficult to read and I heartily recommend it if you never heard anything at Catholic school about indulgences except perhaps that they were sometimes sold in the eeeeevil Middle Ages (Boo! Hiss! He’s BEHIND you!)

One point made by Pope Paul VI is relevant to the indulgences granted for particular days:

The aim pursued by ecclesiastical authority in granting indulgences is not only that of helping the faithful to expiate the punishment due sin but also that of urging them to perform works of piety, penitence and charity—particularly those which lead to growth in faith and which favour the common good. (n.8)In other words, the granting of indulgences is also used by the Church to encourage us to particular devotions that help our spiritual life, perhaps at the same time gently guiding us away from devotions along the lines of the five first Wednesdays Novena of the Holy Kneecap of St Petronilla which you have to photocopy and leave at the back of the Church or the prayer doesn’t work. [Thank you.]

Last year I resolved to prepare a list to remind myself to announce these indulgences. I am happy to share the list on the understanding that it is not an official document, simply a guide:

Plenary Indulgences for particular days. [A great idea.]

[…]

Go read the rest over there.  Very good.

Fr. Z kudos to H.H.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Fr. Z KUDOS, Mail from priests, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
4 Comments

The day virtue was outlawed

Liberal catholics want us all to weenie out and avoid engaging in “culture wars”.

Meanwhile, I saw this commentary piece at CNSNews:

Free Exercise of Virtue Prohibited as of Today in USA

As of today–Jan. 1, 2014–a Democratic administration led by President Barack Obama will use a regulation permitted and funded by a Republican-majority House of Representatives to prohibit Americans from freely exercising not just Christianity, but virtue itself in the United States of America.
The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines virtue as “conformity to a standard of right”–and, in truth, there is only one such standard. Individuals are born and die, nations rise and fall–yet it remains.

Nor can it be escaped–no matter how devoutly men such as Obama seek to annul it, or how abjectly his opponents in the political establishment shrink from defending it.

What is it? The Roman senator Cicero explained it with force and clarity five decades before Christ.

“There is a true law, a right reason, conformable to nature, universal, unchangeable, eternal, whose commands urge us to duty, and whose prohibitions restrain us from evil,” wrote Cicero.

“Neither the senate nor the people can give us any dispensation for not obeying this universal law of justice,” he said. “It is not one thing at Rome and another at Athens; one thing today and another tomorrow; but in all times and nations this universal law must forever reign, eternal and imperishable”

“God himself is its author, its promulgator, its enforcer,” said this Roman senator. “He who obeys it not, flies from himself, and does violence to the very nature of man.”

“When a man is inspired by virtue such as this, what bribes can you offer him, what treasures, what thrones, what empires?” wrote Cicero. “He considers these but mortal goods and esteems his own divine.”

“And,” concluded this pre-Christian statesman, “if the ingratitude of the people, and the envy of his competitors, or the violence of powerful enemies despoil his virtue of its earthly recompense, he still enjoys a thousand consolations in the approbation of conscience, and sustains himself by contemplating the beauty of moral rectitude.”

Our Founding Fathers believed precisely this when they founded the United States.

Before Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, an 18-year-old Alexander Hamilton wrote: “Good and wise men, in all ages, have … supposed that the Deity, from the relations we stand in to Himself and to each other, has constituted an eternal and immutable law, which is indispensably obligatory upon all mankind prior to any human institution whatsoever”

“Upon this law depend the natural rights of mankind,” said Hamilton.

“They are written,” he concluded, “as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the Divinity itself, and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power.”

When Jefferson stated that all men “are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights” and that governments are created to protect those rights, he was echoing both Cicero and the common view of his countrymen.

“Neither aiming at originality of principle or sentiment, nor yet copied from any particular and previous writing, it was intended to be an expression of the American mind, and to give to that expression the proper tone and spirit called for by the occasion,” Jefferson wrote, explaining the Declaration, in a letter he wrote in 1825. “All its authority rests then on the harmonizing sentiments of the day, whether expressed in conversation, in letters, printed essays, or in the elementary books of public right, as Aristotle, Cicero, Locke, Sidney, etc.”

Today, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s ironically entitled “individual responsibility requirement” takes effect–at least so far as the letter of the law is concerned. It says that almost all Americans must “maintain minimum essential coverage” for health insurance for themselves and their dependents or be penalized by the government.

This “minimum essential coverage” includes a “preventive services” regulation, which has been defined by the Obama administration to require co-pay-free coverage for sterilizations as well as drugs and intrauterine devices that cause abortions.

Quite literally, under this regulation, a mother can be forced through her insurance coverage to provide her daughter with the drug that kills her granddaughter.

[…]

Read the rest there.

Posted in Cri de Coeur, Dogs and Fleas, Emanations from Penumbras, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty | Tagged , , , , , ,
8 Comments

BRICK BY BRICK: 1st Anglican Ordinariate “praying heart” monastery in England!

For your Brick by Brick file, I received a press release about the founding of the Anglican Ordinariate in England’s first monastery!

Ordinariate formally establishes its “praying heart”

On January 1, the Solemnity of Mary, the Holy Mother of God, the convent of the Sisters of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Oscott Hill, Birmingham, was filled with priests and lay members of the Ordinariate, local parishioners and friends, for the Mass at which the community of 10 sisters was formally established as The Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham’s first autonomous monastery.

The sisters, formerly members of an Anglican Community in Wantage, Oxfordshire, professed their solemn vows, each placing her hands into those of the Ordinary of the Ordinariate, Monsignor Keith Newton, who read the Decree of Erection, presided at the Mass and delivered the homily. The day was the first anniversary of the sisters’ reception into the full communion of the Catholic Church.

During his homily, Mgr Newton said that January 1 was an appropriate day to mark a new beginning, especially for a community under the maternal care of the Mother of God, who teaches us, he said, “uniquely, though simply and effectively, how to follow her son as his disciples”.

Quoting Pope Paul VI’s description of Our Lady as “the attentive virgin” whose certainty of faith flowed from her contemplative life, Mgr Newton said this was the vocation to which the sisters had been called. “Nobody can explain its value in the world’s terms but its power is immeasurable”.  Mary, Mgr Newton said, taught us to ponder the divine mystery, to listen to God’s voice deep within us. Addressing the sisters directly, he went on: “For us, you will be the praying heart of the Ordinariate”.

Mgr Newton appointed Mother Winsome as the first Reverend Mother for an initial period of three years. Subsequent Reverend Mothers will be elected in accordance with the constitutions of the monastery.

Mother Winsome said: “For us the day was a mixture of great solemnity, but also of deep joy. We each professed our original vows separately, in the case of some of the sisters, more than 50 years ago. For us to be able to renew our vows solemnly and publicly and to be able to share this profound moment, when we have shared such a unique spiritual journey over the last two years, felt a very special gift of God to each of us and to us corporately as Sisters of the Blessed Virgin Mary”.

The Mass was followed by a reception for all in the sisters’ refectory.

For further information, please contact: Catherine Utley 07894 122484

The fruits of Anglicanorum coetibus.

And Benedict XVI is still the Pope of Christian Unity.

Posted in Benedict XVI, Our Catholic Identity, Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged ,
5 Comments

What I’m reading

I have received some material books and some digital, Kindle books recently.  Thank you to the kind people who sent them as gifts.  Thanks!  I am grateful.  Some of them came from publishers and the authors themselves.

Here are a few of those I have received.

First, Michael O’Brien has a new book:  Voyage To Alpha Centauri. If you are in the UK, cut and paste the title into my search box for you at the bottom of this page.

I haven’t cracked this one yet.  O’Brien is very good, especially if you are patient.  His books seem to be getting longer.  A Father’s Tale was long and pays dividends.  He clearly has a contemplative streak, so his books have a different quality than those of most authors.

I also received two books from J. Budziszewski: What We Can’t Not Know: A Guide and also The Line Through the Heart.

Prof. B is deeply interested in Natural Law.  He teaches at the U of Texas in Austin, which is suspect is a challenge and, when the occasional light bulb flashes on, rewarding.  I haven’t read these yet either, but I’ll get to them soon.

Right now I am reading, on Kindle, another in the Kydd series, the 13th, by Julian Stockwin: Conquest

People who liked the fantastic Aubrey/Maturin series, may also like these.  I don’t think they are as well-written, but they have their benefits.  How I envy people who haven’t yet read the Aubrey/Maturin series.

I also read recently Enemies Foreign and Domestic by Matthew Bracken.

This is a trilogy.  Yes, it is dystopian SHTF stuff.

And someone sent me a John Sandford book, Rules of Prey.  I’ll get to that soon.  I believe it is set in my home town.

That’s enough for now.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged
4 Comments

Brown v. Brown

In my home town a UPS driver had a problem with an irate turkey:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-P2SaxyMrKA&feature=player_embedded

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged
8 Comments

On Bishops as Culture Warriors. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

CLICK TO BUY - Help me pay for my "AFFORDABLE" Health Care!

Michael Sean Winters has a piece at Fishwrap (aka National Schismatic Reporter) in which he attacks both Bp. Robert Morlino of Madison (and the undersigned). MSW doesn’t like clerics who are “culture warriors”, you see. The Fishwrappers claim that “culture warriors” are no longer flavor of the month. Ptui! The fact they are trying to distract you from is that they are fully engaged in the culture wars, but for the Enemy. By railing against conservative culture warriors, they are indulging in bullying.

In any event, NSR thinks that Pope Francis doesn’t want bishops (or priests) to be culture warriors. They are therefore emboldened to declare war.

MSW reacted to a piece at Real Clear Politics on Bp. Morlino, entitled “The Miracle of Madtown” (Madison… 77 square miles surrounded by reality) where we read of His Excellency:

When the good Bishop wakes up in the morning, he enters immediately into prayer “very aware that we’re in a culture war. I want the Lord to stir up the gifts of the Holy Spirit to fight the culture war.” But Pope Francis has encouraged Morlino to first “calmly and peacefully look Jesus in the eye and see what He’ll say. It makes a substantial difference for me.”

Be sure to read the whole Real Clear Politics piece.

Meanwhile, MSW of NSR:

Indeed, the replacement of Cardinal Burke with Cardinal Wuerl on the Congregation for Bishops certainly lays the groundwork for the selection of a different kind of bishop here in the United States. This morning, I read this article about Bishop Robert Morlino of Madison, Wisconsin, who says the pope’s example inspires him to double down on his efforts to fight the culture wars. Can we expect an exorcism at the cathedral in Madison sometime soon? [I sure hope so!] There was a time when such comments made one more likely to climb the career ladder within the Church. I suspect that time is now past. Wuerl is a true conservative, eschewing culture wars and exhibiting confidence in the gifts of the Spirit to lead the Church, adopting a more pastoral and less canonical and ideological approach to the task of ecclesial leadership. I would imagine he will promote candidates who share his approach. And not a moment too soon!

I have a note for them.

As Bp. Scicluna reported about a recent conversation with Pope Francis:

“We discussed many aspects,” said Bishop Scicluna. “And when I raised the issue that’s worrying me as a bishop [gay adoption], he encouraged me to speak out.”

If anyone is doubling down on his culture war it just might be Pope Francis. Certainly Pope Francis thinks that Malta’s Bishop Charles Scicluna should be a culture warrior, and a bold one.

Think about this. Pope Francis tells Bp. Scicluna of Malta to double-down on the culture wars (which the NSR hasn’t reported yet). If MSW thinks that Pope Francis is looking for bishops that are NOT like Bp. Morlino, they had better click my link and buy some Mystic Monk Coffee!

Pope Francis told Scicluna to be a… wait for it… culture warrior.

It is likely that Francis is looking for men exactly like Bp. Morlino: men with spines who will stand up in their dioceses and teach the truth.

I tried to help NSR understand what Pope Francis is doing, but they just don’t get it.

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, 1983 CIC can. 915, Brick by Brick, Francis, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , , , , ,
39 Comments

BREAKING! SCOTUS Justice Sotomayor BLOCKS Pres. Obama’s HHS Mandate

Hmmm…. Maybe I should name Justice Sonia Sotomayor Fr. Z’s Person of the Year.

From Politico:

Justice [Sotomayor] delays health law’s birth control mandate

Justice delays health law’s birth control mandate
By: Associated Press
December 31, 2013 10:34 PM EST

WASHINGTON — Only hours before the law was to take effect, a Supreme Court justice on Tuesday blocked implementation of part of President Barack Obama’s health care law that would have forced some religion-affiliated organizations to provide health insurance for employees that includes birth control.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s decision came after a different effort by Catholic-affiliated groups from around the nation. Those groups had rushed to the federal courts to stop Wednesday’s start of portions of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.  [“AFFORDABLE”.. right.  When was your insurance cancelled?]

Sotomayor acted on a request from an organization of Catholic nuns in Denver, the Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged. Its request for an emergency stay had been denied earlier in the day by a federal appeals court.  [Little Sisters of the Poor v. Nuns on the Bus, LCWR, CHA….the Magisterium of Nuns!]

The government is “temporarily enjoined from enforcing against applicants the contraceptive coverage requirements imposed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” Sotomayor said in the order. She gave government officials until 10 a.m. EST Friday to respond to her order.

The law requires employers to provide insurance that covers a range of preventive care, free of charge, including contraception. The Catholic Church prohibits the use of contraceptives. That was not acceptable, said their lawyer, Mark L. Rienzi.

Little Sisters with Benedict XVI

“The Little Sisters are an order of Catholic nuns whose religious faith leads them to devote their lives to caring for the elderly poor. Not surprisingly, they have sincere and undisputed religious objections to complying with this Mandate,” Rienzi said.

The Obama administration crafted a compromise, or accommodation, [NO!  It WASN’T!] that attempted to create a buffer for religiously affiliated hospitals, universities and social service groups that oppose birth control. The law requires insurers or the health plan’s outside administrator to pay for birth control coverage and creates a way to reimburse them.

But for that to work, [See above!] the nuns would have to sign a form authorizing their insurance company to provide contraceptive coverage, which would still violate their beliefs, he said.

“Without an emergency injunction, Mother Provincial Loraine Marie Maguire has to decide between two courses of action: (a) sign and submit a self-certification form, thereby violating her religious beliefs; or (b) refuse to sign the form and pay ruinous fines,” he said.

Sotomayor’s decision to delay the contraceptive portion of the law was joined by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which also issued an emergency stay for Catholic-affiliated groups challenging the contraceptive provision. But one judge on the three-judge panel that made the decision, Judge David S. Tatel, said he would have denied their motion. [Boo!  Appointed by Clinton, preceded by Bader-Ginsburg.]

“Because I believe that appellants are unlikely to prevail on their claim that the challenged provision imposes a ‘substantial burden’ under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, I would deny their application for an injunction pending appeal,” Tatel said. [Thus denying our 1st Amendment rights.]

Here is something interesting.  A few months ago liberal CNN ignored the story the Little Sisters of the Poor in their battle for their religious freedom against the HHS Mandate.  HERE

Posted in Liberals, Magisterium of Nuns, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , , ,
23 Comments

Every word s/he says is a lie, including “and” and “the”.

From CrossMap:

Congressman Chris Smith: The Big Three Obamacare Abortion Lies of the Year

WASHINGTON, Dec. 30, 2013 — Even as President Obama’s now infamous claim, “[i]f you like your plan you can keep it,” is being recognized as the “Lie of the Year” by an independent media watchdog, Rep. Chris Smith (NJ-04), Co-Chair of the Congressional Pro-life Caucus, issued the following statement regarding the “Big Three Obamacare Abortion Lies of the Year.”

Big Lie No. 1: “The Act maintains current Hyde Amendment restrictions governing abortion policy and extends those restrictions to newly created health insurance exchanges.” (Obama Executive Order 13535)

[…]

Big Lie No. 2: Information about which Obamacare plans cover abortion “is on the website…it is available…” (Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius at a December 11 hearing.)

[…]

Big Lie No. 3:“[I]n the Senate bill [which later became law], if you are receiving Federal assistance to buy insurance, and if that plan has any abortion coverage, the insurance company must bill you separately, and you must pay separately from your own personal funds-perhaps a credit card transaction, your separate personal check, or automatic withdrawal from your bank account-for that abortion coverage.  Now, let me say that again.  You have to write two checks: one for the basic policy and one for the additional coverage for abortion.The latter has to be entirely from personal funds.” (Senator Ben Nelson (NE), Dec. 24, 2009)

[…]

Read the whole thing there.

I am reminded of the fight between Lilian Hellman and Mary McCarthy.  To paraphrase the later only slightly:

Every word s/he says is a lie, including “and” and “the”.

 

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Liberals, Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , ,
17 Comments

This isn’t 1 April: Vatican spokesman clarifies that Pope Francis hasn’t abolished sin.

Sometimes the truth is weirder than fiction.

I saw it first at Newsmax and hunted up the links.

On 30 December atheist editor of La Reppublica, Eugenio Scalfari, wrote in an editorial piece entitled  “La Rivoluzione di Francesco – Ha abolito il peccato … “Francis’ Revolution – He abolished sin” HERE

(You will recall that Scalfari printed an “interview” with Pope Francis, during which he didn’t record anything or make notes and subsequently got a bunch of things wrong, cooked up in his ideologized imagination.  The Holy See, ridiculously, put the interview on the Vatican website as if it were some sort of magisterial document and later took it down.  Bottom line: Scalfari gets it wrong… a lot.)

Fr. Lombardi, the papal spokesman, responded that the Pope really didn’t abolish sin.  HERE

Scalfari responds to the response. HERE  Thus, they sell more newspapers.

Newsmax reports it this way:

Vatican Stresses That Pope Has Not Abolished Sin

The Vatican felt compelled on Tuesday to deny that Pope Francis had “abolished sin”, after a well-known Italian intellectual wrote that he had effectively done so through his words and gestures.

The singular exchange began on Sunday when Eugenio Scalfari, an atheist who writes opinion pieces for the left-leaning La Repubblica newspaper, published an article titled “Francis’ Revolution: He has abolished sin”.

Scalfari, who held a long private conversation with the pope earlier this year and wrote about it several times, concluded in the complex, treatise-like article that Francis believed sin effectively no longer existed because God’s mercy and forgiveness were “eternal”.  [In your dreams, Gene ol’ buddy, ol’ shoe.]

Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi told Vatican Radio that “this affirmation that the pope has abolished sin” was wrong.

“Those who really follow the pope daily know how many times he has spoken about sin and our (human) condition as sinners,” Lombardi said.

[…]

Pope Francis also often talks about Hell.

To be clear, Pope Francis sure thinks that homosexual acts are sinful.  He also thinks that people who are divorced and remarried can’t shouldn’t be given Holy Communion.

And Former-Father Greg Reynolds is still excommunicated.

Posted in Goat Rodeos, Lighter fare | Tagged , ,
16 Comments

Fr Z’s Predictions for 2014

Fr. Z’s Predictions for 2014

1. Israel will attack Iran (still waiting for this one)
2. SCOTUS will rule in favor of the Bishops on the HHS Mandate (still waiting on this too)
3. The “AFFORDABLE” Care Act will continue to flop and be unpopular.
4. The number of places in which Extraordinary Form (TLM) Masses are offered will continue to grow.
5. The Canonization of Popes John and John Paul will see the largest crowds in history gathered in Rome.
6. Emeritus Pope Benedict XVI will attend the canonization Mass.
7. Curial Reform will not make significant progress.
8. The Extraordinary Synod of Bishops on the family will leave people wondering why they bothered.
9. Former-Father Greg Reynolds will still be excommunicated.
10. Fr. Z will still not be a Monsignor.

“But Father! But Father!”, some are eagerly saying, “How did last year’s predictions go?”

Let’s find out.

Fr Z’s Predictions for 2013

1) Israel will attack Iran (this one’s running for the 3rd consecutive year) [-1]
2) SCOTUS will rule in favor of the bishops on the HHS Mandate [-1]
3) Pope Benedict will still be Pope [-1 WOW! Got that wrong.]
4) Bishop Finn (still there!) will formally condemn the Fishwrap [-1]
5) The Year of Faith will close; Pope Benedict will issue an encyclical on faith [-.5]
6) The Church of England will find a way to approve women bishops [+1]
7) More Anglicans will join the Ordinariate [+1]
8) Bp Morlino of Madison will be invited as keynote speaker to LCWR Annual Assembly [-1 Who knew?]
9) Italy will have another government (for a while) [+1]
10) Fr. Z will still not be a Monsignor [+1]

Posted in Events, Lighter fare, Linking Back | Tagged ,
33 Comments