A reader told me about a POLL.
The proposition is:
Can you imagine such a question?
At the time of this writing… AGAINST is winning!
Can WDTPRSers stand by?
UPDATE 2225 GMT
UPDATE 19 Oct 1818 GMT
Fr. Z’s Podcasts RSS Feed
About this blog…
“This blog is like a fusion of the Baroque ‘salon’ with its well-tuned harpsichord around which polite society gathered for entertainment and edification and, on the other hand, a Wild West “saloon” with its out-of-tune piano and swinging doors, where everyone has a gun and something to say. Nevertheless, we try to point our discussions back to what it is to be Catholic in this increasingly difficult age, to love God, and how to get to heaven.” – Fr. Z
Coat of Arms by D Burkart
YOUR RECENT COMMENTS
- on Your Sunday Sermon Notes – Holy Family (N.O. Baptism of the Lord) 2025: “first and foremost, your observation about the young Lord at the Temple is priceless. attendance at the Cathedral’s 1230 today…”
- on Your Sunday Sermon Notes – Holy Family (N.O. Baptism of the Lord) 2025: “When we don’t live up to our baptismal mission we put our salvation at risk.”
- on Daily Rome Shot 1220: “Black to move and mate in 5. 1. … Qh4 2. g3 Ng5+ 3. Kg2 (if Bxg5 then 4. Qe4#)…”
- on Daily Rome Shot 1218 – I’m confused.: ““The objective of the formation of the candidate for the priesthood in the affective-sexual sphere is the ability to accept…”
- on YOUR URGENT PRAYER REQUESTS: “Asking prayers for friends with young child who has cancer. They have been pursuing prayer all the way along, along…”
- on Daily Rome Shot 1217 – “Why”, you may be asking? Wherein Fr. Z rants.: “Archdiocese of the Five Boroughs? Archdiocese of Three Boroughs and a couple of counties heading north, maybe… it being a…”
- on Daily Rome Shot 1217 – “Why”, you may be asking? Wherein Fr. Z rants.: “Some Orthodox and Greek Catholics process on their knees”
- on Daily Rome Shot 1219 – on the other hand…: “This calls for the ultimate sacrifice: 1. Qxc2+! RxQ 2. Nxd3+ Kb1 (or a1) 3. Re1+ Rc1 4. RxR mate”
- on Young men are converting to serious, “muscular” Christianity.: “Apologies for coming late to this conversation. I would like to add that most women of a traditional leaning dislike…”
- on Daily Rome Shot 1219 – on the other hand…: “Black to move and mate in 4. [NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t…”
- on From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 03-01-25 – Chewrows: “Don’t worry, as we have seen in NO parishes that pray the TLM, people will kneel and take the Host…”
- on Daily Rome Shot 1218 – I’m confused.: “That’s a kind of confusion I could live with. Getting a cone of pistacchio and stracciatella at a good Italian…”
- on Daily Rome Shot 1218 – I’m confused.: “Let’s take young men who are same sex attracted and put them into an environment where they are with other…”
ABORTION PILL RESCUE NETWORK
Everyone, work to get this into your parish bulletins and diocesan papers.
Federated Computer… your safe and private alternative to big biz corporations that hate us while taking our money and mining our data. Have an online presence large or small? Catholic DIOCESE? Cottage industry? See what Federated has to offer. Save money and gain peace of mind.
I am an affiliate. Click and join or at least explore! If you join, I’ll get credit.
Polls
Loading ...Donate using VENMO
GREAT BEER from Traditional Benedictine Monks in Italy
CLICK and say your daily offerings!
A Daily Prayer for Priests
NEW OPPORTUNITY – 10% off with code: FATHERZ10
Fr. Z’s VOICEMAIL
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265
Good coffee and tea. Help monks.
I use this when I travel both in these USA and abroad. Very useful. Fast enough for Zoom. I connect my DMR (ham radio) through it. If you use my link, they give me more data. A GREAT back up.
Help support Fr. Z’s Gospel of Life work at no cost to you. Do you need a Real Estate Agent? Calling these people is the FIRST thing you should do!
They find you a pro-life agent in your area who commits to giving a portion of the fee to a pro-life group!
This blog has to earn its keep!
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful. Zelle and Wise are better, but PayPal is convenient.
A monthly subscription donation means I have steady income I can plan on. I put you my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I often say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
To donate monthly I prefer Zelle because it doesn't extract fees. Use
frz AT wdtprs DOT comPLEASE RESPOND. Pretty pleeeease?
Loading ...WDTPRS POLL
Loading ...Great WINE USE COUPON CODE: fatherz10
Use my code for a discount
Loading ...
God’s plan made a hopeful beginning,
But man spoiled his chances by sinning,
We trust that the story,
Will end in God’s glory,
But at present, the other side’s winning,
[Oliver Wendell Holmes]
BTW, it looks like you can vote multiple times. I wouldn’t be surprised if someone has written some code to skew the poll (nor would I be overly surprised if someone on our side did that, to be honest).
Also, it looks like this poll is related to an actual debate organised by the site owners, see http://www.intelligencesquared.com/events.php?event=EVT0195
I find it rather poor form that the poll closes before Archbishop Onaiyekan and Ann Widdecombe get a chance to defend the motion. I hope they at least have the courtesy to ask again after (with a transcript on the site or similar), but I guess I won’t hold my breath…
Rouxfus, great quote!
When I voted, the “Fors” were at 18%…
For real? Vote against?
It’s now up to 30.1%
It’s going to take around 5,000 votes to swing this thing. But, with God, all is possible.
~Dr. K
Obviously the people who voted “against”, have never needed the benefit of education, medicine, music, architecture, law, art, etc. etc.
Ironically (or perhaps justly) the numbers are pretty much reversed in this other poll they have
http://www.intelligencesquared.com/events.php?event=EVT0204
(are atheists as blinkered and dogmatic as they claim religious believers to be?)
The vote has now shifted, there’s a majority for the motion.
What that means, also given the fast turnaround, is in itself open for debate… We should bear in mind that the majority is not always right; while political decisions should be based on a vote, what is moral and what isn’t rises above the opinion of the group with the largest amount of votes.
After I just took it, the “for” vote now has 50.1%
51% for!
Why stop at a great world religion? Why not a poll on Belgium? “Belgium is a force for good in the world.” Or why not a poll on Grand Rapids? “Grand Rapids is a force for good in the world.” Nevery mind that the majority of voters might never have been to Belgium or Grand Rapids. This is merely a barometer of the brainless anti-Catholic prejudice of that blog’s readership.
Seeing that Christopher Hitchens is on the panel against the motion tells me all I need to know of that blog.
Force for good? I’d say *very good*.
Those who voted against need to watch the “Catholic Church: Builder of Civilization” series a few times
God moves Fr Z, Fr Z moves polls
It’s now tied at 49.8% for and against.
How trivial, one way or another!
Even just interms of this world, It’s probably true , say, that in 38- 39 a majority of Brits supported apeasement, or engagament as we now say and would have thus polled even in as unscientific and selfselecting a poll as this. Real ity is another matter.
Sad to say, the devil is NOT a gentleman, so people DO take piffle such as this, or Davinci codes, etc, quite seriously.
Just hafter keep on evngelizing and praying and suffering minimartrydoms.For which: Lord, make me your servant, I can manage the useless part on my own.
It looks like the poll has been posted on a couple atheist blogs. That might explain the shift downward.
It should pick up once the rest of the Catholic blog-o-sphere posts the link.
An atheist who asserts the Church has not been a force for good in the world thereby disowns any claim to rational thought as the basis for their disbelief.
“Obviously the people who voted “against”, have never needed the benefit of education, medicine, music, architecture, law, art, etc. etc.”
I don’t know. A good number of my students don’t seem all that positive about actual education.
In whose time zone does it end on the 19th?
‘Against’ is moving up again. It was down to 43.6% and is now up to 44.0%.
OK, I voted just in time (in my time zone anyway). Why do people do things like this?
But polls like this make me glad that, even with all our problems, the founding fathers of the US founded a republic, not a democracy driven purely by majority rule. At least in a republic, if we could get decent people into public office, there is a chance to escape the tyranny of an immoral and/or apathetic majority.
Rogationi septiens septiens modo suffragatus sum. Fer suffragia mature et persaepe. Vox populi vox Dei.
(I just voted for the motion seven times seven times. Vote early and vote often. The voice of the people is the voice of God.)
Even if the pollsters aren’t from North America, it seems appropriate that the last day of the poll is the Feast of the North American Martyrs.
For 54,2 against 45,4
Seeing that Christopher Hitchens is on the panel against the motion tells me all I need to know of that blog.
Aye. A better poll might be, Can Christopher Hitchens and his ilk give us a reason why anything should be a force for good without a). being arbitrary b). being subjectivist to the point of absurdity or c). relying on unprovable axioms that require as much faith as believing in God? Yes or no.
The poll appears to be still accepting votes. Early and often folks!
56% in favor when I voted.
The poll just accepted my vote. Perhaps the poll closes at the end of today?
57 to 42 !
Final Vote 58.4% to 41.8%. Now the real work begins…
I voted
It seems – I think – that they only took consideration to the audience at the gathering, than the worldwide view:
Intelligence² audience confirms 1862 to 268 votes against the motion.
http://www.intelligencesquared.com/past-events.php?event=EVT0195
The Catholic church is a force for good in the world
This poll closed on October 19, 2009
Votes Online Poll Before Debate After Debate
For 58.7% 31.9% 12.4%
Against 40.9% 51.8% 86.0%
Don’t Know 0.4% 16.3% 1.6%
This can be obtained on the vote result in the link above.
God Bless.
Undemocratic block voting on this site did not save the motion.
The debate is to be broadcast around the world on 7 November to an audience of millions.
An indication of how it may be received can be seen by reading the comments (105 so far) on the following site (yes, I know it’s the enemy):
http://richarddawkins.net/articleComments,4477,Intelligence-Squared-debate-Catholics-humiliated-by-Christopher-Hitchens-and-Stephen-Fry-,Andrew-M-Brown—Telegraphacouk,page1#comments
Be prepared…
I have just realised that some people on this site may have thought that the poll was all there was, rather than an incidental precursor to a proper debate.
From the Telegraph Newspaper’s report of the event:
“I have just witnessed a rout – tonight’s Intelligence Squared debate.
It considered the motion “The Catholic Church is a force for good in the world”. Christopher Hitchens and Stephen Fry, opposing the motion, comprehensively trounced Archbishop Onaiyekan (of Abuja, Nigeria) and Ann Widdecombe, who spoke for it.
The archbishop in particular was hopeless.
The voting gives a good idea of how it went.
Before the debate, for the motion: 678. Against: 1102. Don’t know: 346.
This is how it changed after the debate.
For: 268. Against: 1876. Don’t know: 34.
In other words, after hearing the speakers, the number of people in the audience who opposed the motion increased by 774.
My friend Simon, who’s a season ticket holder, said it was the most decisive swing against a motion that he could remember.”
No one has commented here since the debate was so disasterously lost. In 2 weeks time it will be broadcast to a worldwide audience of about 70 million people. Were these two speakers really the best that the church could put forward? There is going to be a tremendous fuss about this very soon.
You can now watch the debate. Everyone should, because it’s been broadcast to an audience of 70 million.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvZz_pxZ2lw (Part 1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFTj9n40rNo (Part 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-q8US0QRs4 (Part 3)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQRkfZzyfcU (Part 4)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i391gBoEo58 (Part 5)
Any reactions? Who should have spoken for the Church instead of these two, who did such an appallingly bad job? They came across as smug, self-satisfied, patronising and pompous. I think that they were not only defeated, they actually were active in causing the loss of the votes of people prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt.
A briefer, playlist link. You need to see this!
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=F821DBF3CE3374A3
Eyes & ears tight shut? Don’t you see how important this is?
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=F821DBF3CE3374A3
Come on – someone please give a considered adult reply to this.
What should be the response?