Some of the worst analysis from a TV broadcast and journalist that I have ever heard about the Church. HERE
Count the problems.
Remember… this is about the coverage.
Moderation queue is ON.
Some of the worst analysis from a TV broadcast and journalist that I have ever heard about the Church. HERE
Count the problems.
Remember… this is about the coverage.
Moderation queue is ON.
Comments are closed.
Coat of Arms by D Burkart
St. John Eudes
- Prosper of Aquitaine (+c.455), De gratia Dei et libero arbitrio contra Collatorem 22.61
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265
“He [Satan] will set up a counter-Church which will be the ape of the Church because, he the devil, is the ape of God. It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the anti-Christ that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ. In desperate need for God, whom he nevertheless refuses to adore, modern man in his loneliness and frustration will hunger more and more for membership in a community that will give him enlargement of purpose, but at the cost of losing himself in some vague collectivity.”
“Who is going to save our Church? Not our bishops, not our priests and religious. It is up to you, the people. You have the minds, the eyes, and the ears to save the Church. Your mission is to see that your priests act like priests, your bishops act like bishops.”
- Fulton Sheen
Therefore, ACTIVATE YOUR CONFIRMATION and get to work!
- C.S. Lewis
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful. Zelle and Wise are better, but PayPal is convenient.
A monthly subscription donation means I have steady income I can plan on. I put you my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I often say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
"But if, in any layman who is indeed imbued with literature, ignorance of the Latin language, which we can truly call the 'catholic' language, indicates a certain sluggishness in his love toward the Church, how much more fitting it is that each and every cleric should be adequately practiced and skilled in that language!" - Pius XI
"Let us realize that this remark of Cicero (Brutus 37, 140) can be in a certain way referred to [young lay people]: 'It is not so much a matter of distinction to know Latin as it is disgraceful not to know it.'" - St. John Paul II
Grant unto thy Church, we beseech Thee, O merciful God, that She, being gathered together by the Holy Ghost, may be in no wise troubled by attack from her foes. O God, who by sin art offended and by penance pacified, mercifully regard the prayers of Thy people making supplication unto Thee,and turn away the scourges of Thine anger which we deserve for our sins. Almighty and Everlasting God, in whose Hand are the power and the government of every realm: look down upon and help the Christian people that the heathen nations who trust in the fierceness of their own might may be crushed by the power of thine Arm. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end. R. Amen.
If you travel internationally, this is a super useful gizmo for your mobile internet data. I use one. If you get one through my link, I get data rewards.
Visits tracked by Statcounter since Sat., 25 Nov. 2006:
Fr. Z, I know you don’t watch much TV but the above is very mild compared to what was broadcast by the TV journalists and their guest analysts – which included clergy – during the Pope’s visit to the USA.
Ha! I suppose the first is referring to Jay Levine as Jay Levin. After that I lost track.
Interestingly, Dutch TV – normally a place where you expect the worst possible commentary – fared a bit better than this. There 80% of the item simply revolved around the observation (quoting Card Eijk) “the will be absolutely no change in the Church’s teachings”. Which of course the reporters saw as disappointing, but at least that observation was spot on.
(Right, your eminences…?)
we cannot address our political malfunctions without confronting the culture. And unfortunately, any politician who does so is instantly targeted as “reactionary”.
The Left took the long view and infiltrated education, media and the Arts…. after several generations of this cultural programming, how many reporters could identify what was wrong with that report?
Over the years, I have become very fond of Terry Mattingly’s “Get Religion”, and although I am not up to par to any of the contributors, let us see if I learned some lessons:
(1) “The Forces”: “…He says there are forces both inside and outside the church that aren’t happy with the direction Pope Francis is taking.” Oh well, were there not forces that were not happy with the direction B XVI was taking? “Gay Mafia”, anyone? Anyhow, there are no attempts by the CBS reporter to identify or, at least, suggest an identity to such “forces”. And let me tell you: there are forces that are not happy when I pray… or GO TO CONFESSION!
(2) A synod “called by Pope Francis to discuss modifying some church positions or requirements to make it more inclusive.”: really?! Well, sure, many can think so, but… really?! Wasn’t it a synod on the family? Heck, I sure have a family! Actually, as a white, Catholic, male, married with children, who makes sure the family observes Sundays and Holy Days of Obligation I do feel that, on occasion, I am “ignored by society”, and would not mind “being reached out as well”. Now on the topic “modifying some church positions or requirements”: I suppose the “reporter” imagines that the Church is like CBS’s boardroom on board meeting days; I suppose he imagines Cardinal Kasper pointing at the colorful PowerPoint graph attempting to correlate “Church Revenue” with “Inclusiveness”. I leave the rest to your imagination.
(3) “The Pope’s landmark, “who am I to judge?” response to a question about gay Catholics made headlines…”: Ah! the infamous “who am I to judge?” brought up without context. I am convinced that, one day, “in a galaxy far, far away”, some sane editor will proscribe the use of this quote, right there in the “Style” handbook.
(4) “… but he’s also opened the door for divorced Catholics to receive communion without getting formal church annulments”: Huh?! First of all, divorced Catholics can receive communion. The ones in a problematic situation are the civilly remarried divorced Catholics. So, I guess this door has been wide open for a while.
(5) ” ‘People cannot pick and choose what they believe or not believe,’ [Archbishop Blase Cupich] says.”: Now, THAT’s not Jay Levine’s fault… or is it? What was the context of this sentence? How does it fit with the story? In one moment Archbishop Cupich is talking on the personal history of divorced Catholics and, by the magic of editing, the words “pick and choose what they believe or not believe” come right after, and are used to caution “not to expect much from the synod”? This is a baffling one, that only Terry can pick apart.
As one who lives in Chicago, Levine’s reporting on matters Catholic has usually been somewhere between bad and awful.