The finest rosaries I have ever seen.

I have on occasion mentioned the best rosaries I have ever seen. They are made by a acquaintance and collaborator way back in the days when I was still involved with Compuserve!  One of the participants started her own rosary making business and produced amazing things.  She took a break for while but is now back at it.

Thus, I bring to your attention: Queen of Peace Rosaries.

I like to give them as priesthood ordination presents.

The ones I have had made over the years are beautiful, have a heavy feel to them, and are strong enough to pull a trailer if hitch gives out.

A few pics.  Here is how they come.

20130805-151403.jpg

They have a cloth bag.

20130805-151410.jpg

I choose the more traditional looking elements.  Big surprise there.

20130805-151419.jpg

You can see how she wraps the wire around a couple times for added strength.

20130805-151424.jpg

These are great – for yourself or as gifts for, perhaps, sacramental moments such as confirmation or ordination, even religious profession.  I know one fellow who had two rosaries made for a couple getting married, identical except for color of the beads.

Check ’em out!

Posted in Just Too Cool, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
28 Comments

Voris on Francis, off-the-cuff remarks, and the MSM

Here is Michael Voris on the “Who am I to judge!” line from Pope Francis on the airplane.

He puts his foot wrong in calling Msgr. Ricca a bishop (he isn’t) but that doesn’t change the substance of what Voris has to say.

Voris raises the possibility that Francis could benefit from some sage advice by his handlers (in avoiding off-the-cuff comments).

I think that would depend on whether or not Pope intends to create a ruckus through these comments or not.

As I have ventured elsewhere, I said that were I advising Francis, I would show him lots of media reactions to his comments and then ask him, “Holy Father, is this what you want?” If he says, “Yes!”… well… then okay!  We work with it.  If he were to say, “No, not really.”, then we would have to work on it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjDKMIMkm4&feature=player_embedded

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Liberals, The Drill | Tagged , ,
58 Comments

When you can’t receive Holy Communion: Go any way … or…

Here is a great shot of His Eminence Raymond Card. Burke in what appears to be the church of the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe in WI.

I picked this up from facebook

Explanation:

Louis [the child] was so sad that he couldn’t receive 1st Communion; he was in tears. When he said hi to Cardinal Burke, I explained to the Cardinal why he was sad and Louis just leaned into him and cried. His Eminence embraced him so lovingly and told him, “don’t worry, your first Communion will come soon enough!”
I love that Louis poured out his sorrow to him like the shepherd that Cardinal Burke is… so dear!

.

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
28 Comments

Getting Shakespeare WRONG

As some of you know, I am a great fan of The Bard. (For example, HERE.  I really must get back to that some day.)

I saw at Saint Austin Review a piece by Joseph Pearce which struck a nerve.  What Pearce saw done to Shakespeare is what we also see being done in theology today.

Fighting The Shakespeare Wars
BY JOSEPH PEARCE

Last night I was fighting the Shakespeare Wars at DeSales University in Pennsylvania. I had been invited by the priest who runs the university’s centre for faith and culture to address the controversy surrounding the Catholic Shakespeare as part of DeSales’ annual Shakespeare Festival. Instead of giving a speech followed by a period of questions, I was asked to make only a few brief introductory comments so that the bulk of the event could be devoted to a period in which I would field questions from the audience. A lively session followed in which I addressed questions connected to Shakespeare’s life and to many of his plays.
Immediately after the event I took my seat at the university’s theatre to see a performance of Measure for Measure. It was well directed and extremely well acted, though the production succumbed, all too predictably, to the modern tendency to vulgarize and accentuate the bawdy elements to the detriment of the main moral thrust of the drama. Nonetheless, the palpitating presence of Isabella’s holiness exorcised the demons and shone forth Shakespeare’s patently Catholic purpose. Her role and presence in the play serves as a timely and timeless mataphor for the power and purpose of the presence of the saints in the vale of tears. Indeed her presence tears the veil so that the light of heaven can penetrate the darkness. Although the non-believers in the audience did not know it, they were being evangelized with the light and love of the Gospel.
On a darker, uglier note, I was saddened to see that the theatre’s bookstore offered only two books on Shakespeare, both of which are examples of woefully poor scholarship. The first was Bertram Fields’ pathetically shallow attempt to show that Shakespeare was not really Shakespeare but that he was really the Earl of Oxford in disguise. The other was Germaine Greer’s equally pathetic and perverse effort to show that Shakespeare was a male chauvenist pig. The bookstore also offered a pink t-shirt for sale with a picture of the Bard wearing heavy make-up and transformed into a transvestite. Thus the false Shakespeare, the feminist Shakespeare and the queer Shakespeare were all on gaudy display. Needless to say, the real Shakespeare was nowhere to be seen. Such crass injustice to our Catholic Bard merely encourages me to fight all the harder in the Shakespeare Wars.

May I recommend a couple books about Shakespeare’s (unquestionable) Catholicism?

First, try Clare Asquith’s Shadowplay: The Hidden Beliefs and Coded Politics of William Shakespeare. She over plays her hand once in while, but in the main the book is engaging and convincing.

Also, Joseph Pearce, mentioned above, has The Quest for Shakespeare

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged ,
22 Comments

New/Old Secretary for the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei”

I am scratching my head this morning.

Pope Francis has moved the former Secretary of the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei“, who was eventually consecrated bishop and became the Papal Almoner, back to the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei“… as Secretary… again.

From the Bolletino:

RINUNCE E NOMINE
NOMINA DEL SEGRETARIO DELLA PONTIFICIA COMMISSIONE «ECCLESIA DEI»

Il Santo Padre Francesco ha nominato Segretario della Pontificia Commissione «Ecclesia Dei» S.E. Mons. Guido Pozzo, Arcivescovo titolare di Bagnoregio, finora Elemosiniere di Sua Santità.

“But Father! But Father!”, people will ask, “What does this mean? Wasn’t Archbp. Pozzo involved somehow with the degeneration of the talks with the SSPX?”

He was around, yes, when things started to become more difficult, yes. But I suspect that there would have been complications no matter who was there.

There is little doubt that Pozzo knows the material and terrain. He is arguably one of the better informed men in the Curia when it comes to dealings with the SSPX.

Will that make any difference?

I have a few less-optimistic interpretations, but I will keep them to myself.

My initial guess is that in this move the PCED, which is now under the CDF, has been “beefed up” a little. Now the PCED has not only a Vice-President in the person of Archbp. Di Noia, it also has a Secretary who is a bishop. This does give the PCED a little more “weight”, in a sense.

However, with a Prefect who seems not to want to have anything to do with the SSPX and now the return of Archbp. Pozzo to the PCED, one wonders how Archbp. Di Noia and Pozzo will “tag team” this complicated mess to a positive conclusion.

Color me puzzled.

In the meantime, everyone, surge forward!

Use the provisions of Summorum Ponticum.

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", SSPX | Tagged , , , ,
16 Comments

HuffPo: You can’t be a Republican (who hate and mock the poor) and a Christian

At HuffPo there is a stunningly dopey headline over a stunningly dopier opinion piece by someone named Larry Atkins, whom I don’t recall ever having heard of before.

Headline:

Why Would a Christian Want to Be a Republican, in Light of Pope Francis?

?!?

Here is the essential argument.

Pope Francis is for “the poor”.
President Obama is for “the poor”.
Republicans, I am not making this up, “frequently mock and hold in contempt the poor.”

Therefore,…

We should have even bigger government, which means that – in the name of Pope Francis himself! – you should be a Democrat or you are a bad Christian and, obviously, a bad person.

You have to read that piece.

This is another example of what I wrote about, HERE.

Never mind the official Democrat promotion of abortion (the writer claims the Bible is silent on that, btw)….

Some people think that free-markets and entrepreneurship will help “the poor” more efficiently, more quickly, and in a way that protects and fosters their human dignity. Others think that money should be redistributed, in “fairness”, through the agency of a vast government bureaucracy.

Posted in Liberals, Linking Back, The Drill, The future and our choices, You must be joking! | Tagged ,
36 Comments

QUAERITUR: Woman training altar servers stands in as priest. Sacrilege?

From a reader:

My parish priest recently asked an older (semi-retired) female altar server (former MC & Sacristan) from another parish to train our altar servers for enrolment into the Guild of St Stephen (http://www.guildofststephen.org/).

First of all she discourages genuflecting (as it looks uneven if those carrying things don’t genuflect – and being older she can’t do it as easily) – but when training for the lavabo  / consecration / ablutions she had another female server from her parish stand in as the priest, and used the real chalice (and drank the unconsecrated wine herself from the priest’s chalice). Is this sacrilege?

There are several points to consider.

First, I cannot tell if this involves the Novus Ordo or the Usus Antiquior.  If it involves the Usus Antiquior, then it is deeply wrong to discourage genuflecting, because it is required.  If it is the Novus Ordo, then… well… as deeply stupid as the rubric is not to genuflect when passing in front of the tabernacle, there is a rubric about that.  That rubric is so dumb that were someone to confess to me that he genuflected anyway, I would have a hard time getting worked up about it.

To have a female stand in as the priest during a practice…. sacrilege?  Welllll…. no, probably not.  It would be better were a male of any age to do that.  Far better.  But, so long as the female wasn’t dressing up, etc., I guess I could in a grouchy way live with that for the purpose of a practice.

Should women, for example, never be able to help an Extraordinary Form altar boy learn his Latin responses?  Learn to hold his hands properly when standing?  Genuflect properly?  If those things, then why not a little more?  If there are no men available to teach them, then who?

Now…using the real chalice?  I don’t like that at all.  That is unnecessary for the purpose of a practice.  They don’t need a real chalice, even though they might want to practice carrying the chalice from the credence table to the altar.   Using actual wine for the practice?  Drinking from the chalice.  This is starting to sound a lot like “simulation” of a sacrament, which would be a very serious matter indeed.

Anything that smacks of simulation – by adults in front of children – should be avoided.  Young children “playing Mass” is a different matter, though parents ought to watch that like the proverbial… NSA.  I was going to say proverbial hawk, but… you know.

This opens up another, deeper, issue.

Some things used during sacred liturgy are constituted as sacred things.  The chalice is one of these.  They are to be used in a sacred space, the church building, and then within the even more sacred space of the sanctuary, the proper place of those who are set aside as consecrated persons.  It does make a difference who enters the sanctuary and what he or she does there.  Also, the priest’s hands are consecrated so that he can handle sacred things.  I am always pleased to see altar boys or lay people working in sacristies who are trained to handle sacred vessels while wearing gloves or with some other cloth between their bare hands and the vessel itself.

It is important for our Catholic identity to revive a strong sense of the sacred: sacred times, places, persons and objects.

If you are really concerned that someone is going over the line in these practices, then it behooves you to bring your concerns to the attention of the parish priest.  I would’t go to him for something trivial, however.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
25 Comments

What’s red, flutters a little, and is carried in an entrance procession?

What’s red, flutters a little, and is carried in an entrance procession?

Yes, the elevated image of your patronal red fish god.

Someone sent me a link to a video of the entrance procession for the Mass at the Basilica Shrine in Washington, DC.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvbQUm8AVPg&feature=player_embedded

Just for a fun contrast.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

This is also a great opportunity to repost the video of the wonderful sermon Bp. Slattery (D. Tulsa) gave for that memorable event, the Pontifical Mass at the Throne to celebrate the anniversary of Benedict XVI’s election.

UPDATE:

I see that Jeffrey Tucker of NLM also wrote about this.  HERE

Posted in Lighter fare, Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
63 Comments

A tactic

We are starting to see more often now the heterodox attack orthodox defenses of Catholic doctrine as “turning against the poor”.

In the combox here, under a post about Bp. Morlino, someone tried to slither in a snarky implication that Bp. Morlino stopped helping “the poor” when the Diocese of Madison rearranged funding for a multi-cultural center.  (To be clear: the notion that Morlino and/or the diocese stopped helping the poor is just plain weird.)

Now I see that His Eminence Francis Card. George of Chicago will no longer give money from the Campaign for Human Development to a group that also promotes “same-sex marriage” as part of their political agenda. Cardinal George explains HERE that we cannot give money to a group that promotes something that so egregiously goes against Catholic teaching. I would add: against nature, against the ecology of the human person, as it were.

I must note that there is not a direct parallel between the Madison and Chicago thing.  The point is that they are both accused of being somehow against “the poor”, as if by mentioning “the poor”, we know longer should consider anything else, such as the proper administration of the goods of the diocese and the best way to help the poor or, on the other hand, defense of and teaching of Catholic doctrine and the ecology of the human person in a clear way and to avoid scandal.

Here is what Card. George wrote:

ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO

AN OPEN RESPONSE TO AN OPEN LETTER
JULY 29. 2013

On Monday, July 29, in the Chicago Tribune, a group of Catholics published an open letter addressed to me and to the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD). They accused the Church of turning her back on the poor. This accusation follows a decision by the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (ICIRR) to include support for “same-sex marriage” as part of their political agenda. The CCHD cannot fund groups that support this goal.

Donors to the CCHD give to this anti-poverty organization with the understanding that their money will be passed on to organizations that respect the teachings of the Catholic faith. Organizations that apply for funds do so agreeing to this condition.

On May 23, the ICIRR board broke faith with its member organizations when it publicly supported so called “same-sex marriage.” For its own political advantage, it introduced a matter extraneous to its own purpose and betrayed its own members, who were not consulted.

The CCHD had no choice but to respect the unilateral decision of the ICIRR board that effectively cut off funding from groups that remain affiliated with ICIRR. Without betraying its donors or the Catholic faith, the Catholic Church’s long-standing work for immigrant groups and for immigration reform remains intact. This record speaks for itself and is well known. It is carried locally by Priests for Justice for Immigrants and by Sisters and Brothers of Immigrants, along with very many lay Catholics, in collaboration with the Archdiocesan Office for Immigrant Affairs and Immigration Education, led by Elena Segura with my complete support.

It is intellectually and morally dishonest to use the witness of the Church’s concern for the poor as an excuse to attack the Church’s teaching on the nature of marriage.  Four weeks ago, Pope Francis wrote: “…marriage should be a stable union of man and woman…this union is born of their love, as a sign and presence of God’s own love, and of the acknowledgement and acceptance of the goodness of sexual differentiation, whereby spouses can become one flesh and are enabled to give birth to a new life.” In other words, when it comes to marriage and family life, men and women are not interchangeable. The whole civilized world knows that.

Those who signed the open letter in the Tribune proclaimed their adherence to the Catholic faith even as they cynically called upon others to reject the Church’s bishops. The Church is no one’s private club; she is the Body of Christ, who tells us he is “the Way, the Truth, and the Life.” Because the signers of the letters are Catholic, they know that in a few years, like each of us, they will stand before this same Christ to give an account of their stewardship. Jesus is merciful, but he is not stupid; he knows the difference between right and wrong. Manipulating both immigrants and the Church for political advantage is wrong.

Francis Cardinal George, OMI
Archbishop of Chicago

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged , ,
22 Comments

Sister is upset that Archbp. Sartain will attend the LCWR meeting

The nuns aren’t happy.

That is to say the LCWR nuns aren’t happy.  All the traditional sisters are happy.

It seems that the LCWR’s Vatican Overlord is going to attend the whole of the LCWR meeting at the swanky Royale Caribe hotel in Orlando… near Disneyworld.

Archbp. Sartain of Seattle was appointed by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to keep his eyes on the doings of the sisters.

You will recall that the CDF did a doctrinal investigation of the LCWR and found it lacking.  Thus, the Holy See’s “hostile takeover”.

Fishwrap (aka National Schismatic Reporter) is saying that a former LCWR co-mentor, Sr. Theresa Kane (about whom I wrote just the other day – HERE – because she was unhappy with Pope Francis) has unhappy things to say about Archbp. Sartain’s presence at their confab at the swanky Royale Caribe.

One former LCWR president said its members are preparing for this year’s assembly with an “ominous feeling.”

“We’re going into this assembly knowing that there’s a cloud over our head and that we are being investigated and they are going to be monitoring us,” said Mercy Sr. Theresa Kane, who served as LCWR president from 1979 to 1980.

Sartain, Kane said, is “showing up, and he’s staying for the entire assembly. It’s monitoring. There’s a cloud … and we’re living through it.”

Turn that frown upside down, Sister!  When heresy gives you Sartain, make lemonade!

I, on the other hand, am still darn sad.  The LCWR rejected me.  They rejected my entirely sincere and legitimate application for media credentials, which I submitted in all good will and honesty.  I would also have been able to visit my mother, who is in Florida. The nuns made my mother sad, too.

So, Sartain gets to go… lucky dog… and I can’t!

 

Posted in Liberals, Women Religious | Tagged , , , ,
22 Comments