Canon Law Conference at O.L. Guadalupe Shrine

Over the last couple days I attended a Canon Law and Civil Law Conference at the beautiful Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe in the Diocese of LaCrosse. A great setting for a great conference.

Alas, the Shrine is in a rather remote area, and there was neither phone coverage nor internet. I was pretty much off the grid for a couple days.

Here, however, are a few pics.

The attendees formed a group of goodly size this year.  I attended 3 years ago and it was smaller.  There were quite a few civil lawyers and non-priests at the meeting.

20130802-195722.jpg

Archbp. Sample giving his address.  Sorry… my iPhone isn’t good at low light and distance.

20130802-195741.jpg

Here is a shot of the interior of the church.  This proves that we don’t have to build ugly churches if we don’t want to.

20130802-195758.jpg

20130802-195816.jpg

The Shrine is staffed by the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate, about whom we have thought a great deal of late.

20130802-195827.jpg

Last night there was a nice supper and, afterward, Q&A with the speakers.  The food at the cafe is surprisingly good.

20130802-195847.jpg

Cardinal Burke asking Bishop Gainer (D. Lexington) a question.

20130802-195903.jpg

Card. Burke preached at the noon Mass today.

20130802-195920.jpg

Fr. Z and friend doing a little writing after the conference.

20130802-200002.jpg

I was deeply edified by the talks and gained a lot of insight into the work of diocesan tribunals.  It was a valuable two days in a beautiful, prayerful setting.

The Shrine is worth the effort to visit.  Make the effort and take the time.

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged , , , ,
17 Comments

HEY! YOU! Who do you think you are?!?

There is an AP story floating around, in which the undersigned is quoted, “Analysis: Pope’s revolution; not all are pleased” by Nicole Winfield of AP.

As usual, Nicole gets some things wrong and some right. My focus at this moment is this part, wherein I – and you – are mentioned.

Here is the section:

His recent decision to forbid priests of a religious order from celebrating the old Latin Mass without explicit authorization seemed to be abrogating one of the big initiatives of Benedict’s papacy, a 2007 decree allowing broader use of the pre-Vatican II Latin liturgy for all who want it. The Vatican denied he was contradicting Benedict, but these traditional Catholics see in Francis’ words and deeds a threat. They are in something of a retreat.
“Be smart. There will be time in the future for people to sort what Vatican II means and what it doesn’t mean,” the Rev. John Zuhlsdorf warned his traditionalist readers in a recent blog post. “But mark my words: If you gripe about Vatican II right now, in this present environment, you could lose what you have attained.”
Even more mainstream conservative Catholics aren’t thrilled with Francis.

It seems that I am a traditionalist.. and so are you.

That would be a surprise to a lot of traditionalists. But then again, the neo-con no-risk conservatives are squinting at us too. And liberals can’t stand us.

It sounds like, though the wording is ambiguous, that you are not “mainstream”.  Fair?

We just can’t win, can we?

I see this sort of thing all the time when I and this blog are mentioned.

Delightful!

Question for the readers, and this might lead to a poll.

How do you identify yourselves?

Are you “traditionalists”? Conservatives? Mainstream? Lefties? Just Catholics? Tradition-friendly?

I am looking for pithy, one or two word, descriptors which I could use in a poll, if I want to put one together.

HAVE AT!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Our Catholic Identity |
354 Comments

Bp. Morlino … ad multos annos

On 1 August 2003, His Excellency Most Rev. Robert C. Morlino was installed as Bishop of Madison.  Madison, one of the great liberal bastions of these USA, has been described by some as “47 square miles surrounded by reality”.

Happy 10th anniversary of ministry in MadCity.

With his clear eye fixed on the Church’s mission and doctrine, and his sense of humor, and his willingness to be attacked in the liberal press (and in Madison that’s just about the only kind) Bp. Morlino has been a source of encouragement for many in these cultural wars we are experiencing.

You could in a small way express your congratulations to Bp. Morlino for this milestone by sending online a donation to the Diocese.  In the last 10 years the number of seminarians has quintupled, nearly sextupled, from 6 to about 35.  To this this strains the budget – but in a good way – doesn’t quite capture the need.   Click HERE.

Last year I heard with my own ear him tell the seminarians that he wanted them to know the Extraordinary Form before he ordained them.

I have met a lot of the seminarians and they are outstanding young men.

Tonight His Excellency will be on EWTN with Raymond Arroyo, 8 EDT, 7 CDT.

Say a prayer for the bishop in his heavy pastoral mandate.

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Just Too Cool | Tagged ,
17 Comments

Wherein Fr. Z offers kudos to Jamie Manson and shares her pain

It isn’t often that I can give “Fr Z Kudos” to the Fishwrap’s Jamie Manson (openly lesbian activist, mentored by Sr. Margaret Farley, and darling of the LCWR).

In the wake of Pope Francis’ comments on the airplane about homosexuals and women and all sort of other things, over at the Fishwrap (aka The National Schismatic Reporter) Jamie came out with a piece entitled:

When does our hope for Francis become denial?

Jamie is upset with Francis. She likes him, but she’s losing hope for him. It seems he is not going to approve sexual relations between people of the same sex after all.

But wait, there’s more to be upset about.

Get this:

Pope Francis’ words about women were spirit-breaking. The idea that we need a “deeper theology of women” is remarkable only because, for the past half-century, Catholic women theologians, many of them women religious, have been developing, writing and teaching a profound theology of women. Just because the hierarchy has not cared to read it doesn’t mean it doesn’t already exist. I shudder to think whom Francis would ask to formulate this “deeper theology.”

Jamie got it in one.

She sees that Francis thinks that the theology that Jamie’s sort of feminist “theologians” have produced is not profound at all.

Jamie is in pain, the pain felt by so many victims of injustice.

She is in even more pain because of Francis saying that women can’t be ordained!  She writes:

As a woman who has discerned a calling to the priesthood for more than 20 years, Francis’ hiding behind John Paul II’s theology and claiming that the “door is closed” on the ordination issue was profoundly painful. Hearing these words, I felt the same kind of humiliation I would have experienced if a door had literally been slammed in my face.

Jamie Jamie Jamie… you think you’ve known pain?  What about my pain?

I was thrown out of seminary twice…

… before I was ordained by the author of Ordinatio sacerdotalis.

 

Posted in Fr. Z KUDOS, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , ,
85 Comments

Sr. Kane (of “NUNS GONE WILD” fame) on Pope Francis’ feelings. Wherein Fr. Z rants and has some fun.

First, take a look HERE.  This is where the Holy See posted the transcript of Pope Francis’ chat with newsies on the flight back to Rome from Rio.  From what I can tell, it is the whole thing and in the original languages.

Next, (in my Rod Serling voice) we turn our attention to the odd musings of one Sr. Theresa Kane, former co-mentor of the LCWR and one of the sisters featured in my popular, hit post NUNS GONE WILD.

Sr. Kane supports women in deciding to undergo fake ordinations of women in the Catholic Church as if they were real.

Follow along.

Pope Francis said on the airplane from Rio to Rome (original and my translation):

E, con riferimento all’ordinazione delle donne, la Chiesa ha parlato e dice: “No”. L’ha detto Giovanni Paolo II, ma con una formulazione definitiva. Quella è chiusa, quella porta, ma su questo voglio dirti una cosa. L’ho detto, ma lo ripeto. La Madonna, Maria, era più importante degli Apostoli, dei vescovi e dei diaconi e dei preti. … And, in reference to the ordination of women, the Church has spoken and says: “No”.  John Paul II said this, but with a definitive formulation.  It is closed, this door, but I want to tell you something about this.  I’ve said this, but I’ll repeat it.  “La Madonna”, Mary, was more important than the Apostles, than bishops, and than deacons and priests.

Ordination of women?  The door is closed.  In other words, “Not. Going. To. Happen.”

In the wake of WYD in Rio, Sr. Kane commented on Pope Francis’ airplane remarks to the National Schismatic Reporter, which (as the newspaper of record for heterodoxy) tirelessly stumps for the heresy that women can be ordained priests.

Kane said in NSR:

“John Paul II was definitive, but John Paul II is dead,” said Kane. “You don’t just bury it because John Paul II said it. I wonder what [Francis’] own feeling is.”

Good grief.  How many things are wrong with this notion of hers?

What John Paul taught definitively was only definitive while he was alive?  When a Pope dies his teaching is zeroed out unless another Pope feels he wants to make it his own?

In Kane’s labyrinthine mind what the Church says about the ordination of women is merely a policy rather than a definitive teaching.  Policies can be changed with the stroke of a pen. Exponents of the Magisterium of Nuns sees this issue through the lens of power and this-worldly social justice.

Furthermore, what is Francis’ feeling about this?

What part of “the door is closed” is hard to grasp?

There’s lots of other rubbish in what Kane said over at Fishwrap, but let’s stick with that “feeling” thing for a moment or two longer.

Her ideas sound rather like those of a talking head on MSNBC the other day.  HERE.

Remember Melissa Harris Perry of the tampon earrings? She said:

“When does life begin? I submit the answer depends an awful lot on the feeling of the parents. A powerful feeling – but not science,” Harris-Perry said on her show Sunday. “The problem is that many of our policymakers want to base sweeping laws on those feelings.”

There is a creepy similarity in their reasoning.  Substitute “parents” with “Pope and bishops” and “science” with “doctrine”.

If feelings change, the status of the fetus changes from human to non-human.  If feelings change, the status of the ordination of women “policy” changes from closed door to open door.

Feeeeelings wowowo feeeeeeelings!

What does this “feelings” and “policy” vision lead to?

Picture if you will the fictional Pope Lío I, born entirely from the imagination.

In the minds of these strange sisters and those who support them, Lío is the first “compassionate Pope” ehvvur, … except maybe for John XXIII, who was the first “good Pope” or good “Bishop of Rome”… or… whatever.  “Good Pope” John opened the windows and doors of the Church to the world with Vatican II, which as you know was the most important event, like ehvvur, since … I dunno… like before Jesus even though happiness was thwarted by Humanae vitae and, in 2005, the Pope Who Must Not Be Named.  In fact, Lío I really is Pope Lío “the Great” because he personally drives a used Fiat 500, pets people’s dogs during audiences, lives in a card-board box in the Vatican gardens and wears canvass sneakers.

Pope Lío I is really truly for justice and equality for all. He feels that it is time to change policy and open the door to women’s ordination.

He overturns the policy of dead, stole and mozzetta wearing Pope John Paul II, who felt in his day that women should not be ordained.  Mean ol’ JP2’s teaching isn’t definitive now because he’s… well… definitively dead.   So, under wonderful Lío, we have a new policy of justice.  Ordination of women is finally here!

Then, one fell day, on a Roman bus in the suburbs on his way to help lay bricks at a mosque, Lío is feeding the poor with his own hands while talking to journalists about the sale of the Pietà to raise money for the distribution of condoms from the center loggia of St. Peter’s Basilica – ’cause he feels it’s time to reverse the policy of the dead, mozzetta-wearing, sedia-riding, Paul VI.

Alas, in spite of the protection detail of nuns on the bus around him, Pope Lío is taken out by women-oppressing Vatican II-hating rad-trad Catholics who shout “TURN BACK THE CLOCK” while carrying banners in favor of Latin and inequality for women and injustice for gays.

Lío, tragically, didn’t have time to change the policy of election of Bishops of Rome by cardinals over to popular election – that was to be the next week’s project.  There has to be another conclave.  Cardinals, ordained males, many of them even white and straight (perhaps invalidating their votes!), gather in Rome.

Pope LEO XIV is elected!

Before Pope Leo “the Terrible” – surely an anti-Pope because he wears a stole and mozzetta – mounts the sedia gestatoria in his red shoes, he reopens the Papal Apartments in the Apostolic Palace and, at Benedict XVI’s the Pope Who Must Not Be Named’s old desk, with pen in his male white hand – surely a phallic-symbol according to the LCWR – with a resounding BOOM slams the ordination door “policy” in the face of women of every age.

Oh the weeping!  Oh the patheos pathos!  Oh oh … the horror!

Protests rise up.  The agony of women is everywhere in the press.  “You CAN’T do THAT!, they cry, “Pope Lío’s policy was definitive!”

“No, wait!” they plead, “It was INFALLIBLE!”

When you get right down to it, the nuns calling for the ordination of women are simply begging for approval from men.

I have to end this here so I can reapply for media credentials for the upcoming LCWR assembly.  Since they rejected my application for this year – yes, I’ll try again – I’ll get ready for the upcoming 2020 assembly.

Posted in Francis, Liberals, Magisterium of Nuns, Puir Slow-Witted Gowk, The Drill, Throwing a Nutty, Wherein Fr. Z Rants, Women Religious | Tagged , , , , , , , ,
48 Comments

Weather check!

Like a lot of the stuff I have been reading these days:

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged , , ,
5 Comments

Blog registration to post comments – practical notes

If you want to register or have registered and have not been able to post comments, take note.

My registration form is under constant attack by spammers.  I have to clear dozens of attempts a day at registration and scores of attempts to post comments.

Therefore, I use that ABOUT YOURSELF field in the registration form as a way to sort out spammers from the decent and God-fearing.

If you put something that is vague, generic or neutral in that “about yourself” field, I won’t approve your registration.  Help me know that you aren’t an attacker by mentioning something Catholic.  Maybe… I dunno… your favorite Pope or Mystery of the Rosary or saint or confirmation name.   See what I mean?  Most Chinese or Russian spammers don’t do that sort of thing.

Also, please do NOT use your email address as your username (which will appear on your comments).  I am trying to help you avoid getting unwanted spam.

Finally, you may NOT register using a user name of famous people, even historical figures.  A few people have done that in the past.  I don’t like it and I get to be the benevolent dictator here.

I try to look at the registration queue several times a day.  But your approval (deletion) may not be swift.

It is necessary for me NOT to have a completely open combox here.  I had that for a while and vicious mouth-breathing idiots dumped their bilious logorrhea in here by the toilet bowl load.

Sometimes I wonder what my (already high) traffic would be here were I to leave the combox open, but no amount of traffic would be worth that.

I am grateful to all of you who post thoughtful, helpful comments.

Lastly, check out Fr. Z’s Litany for the Conversion of Internet Thugs (2.0)

UPDATE:

Since I posted this (not very long ago) some registrations came in that I didn’t have to puzzle over… except one, which I let through because what was offered seemed both rare and penitential.  Most, however, opted to add a favorite saint or confirmation name, etc.  That takes away my guess work.  Thanks.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes |
Comments Off on Blog registration to post comments – practical notes

“What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy’s strategy.”

Elizabeth Scalia posted her idea at the blog of First Things.  Here is an excerpt.  You can read the rest over there:

[…]

Spinning and framing is what takes up most of the time of the mainstream press. That being so, some Catholics on social media are voicing concerns that Pope Francis is being “used” by the press in order to serve their own, gay-sympathetic agenda. Wrote one terribly irate man on Facebook: “Francis hasn’t broken through the media hostility to Catholicism—rather, they think (wrongly, I presume) that he’s an ally in their fight against Catholicism.”

Perhaps they do believe that; perhaps some of them really are “using” Francis. But how do they know he is not “using” them right back?

In Sun Tzu’s The Art of War, we read, “Speed is the essence of war. Take advantage of the enemy’s unpreparedness; travel by unexpected routes and strike him where he has taken no precautions.”

Francis is doing precisely that. [Wellll… maybe he is.  Maybe he isn’t.] Unlike Pope Benedict XVI, who was already despised by the press as Cardinal Ratzinger, Francis is the surprising, not-quite-known entity with whom the press is still unfamiliar and thus only marginally prepared to counter. He keeps people on their toes. He declines interviews, then unexpectedly pops in for one, and then proclaims the reality of Church teachings through a subject the press cannot resist covering.

[…]

So, if I get this right, Pope Francis purposely makes statements “off-the-cuff”, about alluring topics, perhaps even just ambiguous enough to be controversial, so that the MSM can’t help but bite. That’s when the newsies fall into his trap. The stir that he causes is both a chance to change people’s impressions of the Church and also for the Church’s actual teachings to be brought out and clearly explained when people are paying attention.

Francis baits traps? Is Francis an adept of subtle war? What’s books were in the satchel he carried to Rio? Caesar? Capablanca? Sun Tzu?

Okay, I’m pushing a bit. Maybe Francis is just, I dunno… a crafty old Jesuit?

兵者,詭道也。故能而示之不能,用而示之不用,近而示之遠,遠而示之近,… All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near. – Sun Tzu

Posted in Francis, The Drill | Tagged , ,
93 Comments

How to get Francis wrong on homosexuality

Over at the National Schismatic Reporter (aka Fishwrap) I saw a self-indulgent piece by the new contributor, Fr. Thomas Reese, SJ.  He wrote a longish offering called “Sodom, homosexuality, drone strikes and prayer”.

Here is a sample of Reese’s post (with my emphases):

Pope Francis made clear [to reporters on the airplane] that being gay is not an impediment for ordination. For him, the issue is not orientation but whether a person is a good priest. Even if a priest fails in celibacy, one can “then convert, and the Lord both forgives and forgets. We don’t have the right to refuse to forget.” The pope made it clear that there is no room for homophobia either in the church or society. But if I had said what he said 24 hours before he said it, I would have been reported to the archbishop.

First, Reese is playing the drama queen to his base.  That’s clear enough, but leave that aside.

Second, how can Reese say that, if in his sermon in Frisco last Sunday, he had he said what Pope Francis said on the plane, he would have been be reported to the archbishop?

For saying what, exactly?

The Pope’s words (my emphases):

QUESTION: I would like to ask permission to pose a rather delicate question.  Another image that went around the world is that of Monsignor Ricca and the news about his personal life.  I would like to know, your Holiness, what will be done about this question.  How should one deal with this question and how does your Holiness wish to deal with the whole question of the gay lobby?

FRANCIS: Regarding the matter of Monsignor Ricca, I did what Canon Law required and did the required investigation.  And from the investigation, we did not find anything corresponding to the accusations against him.  We found none of that.  That is the answer.  But I would like to add one more thing to this: I see that so many times in the Church, apart from this case and also in this case, one  looks for the “sins of youth,” for example, is it not thus?, And then these things are published.  These things are not crimes.  The crimes are something else: child abuse is a crime.  But sins, if a person, or secular priest or a nun, has committed a sin and then that person experienced conversion, the Lord forgives and when the Lord forgives, the Lord forgets and this is very important for our lives.  When we go to confession and we truly say “I have sinned in this matter,” the Lord forgets and we do not have the right to not forget because we run the risk that the Lord will not forget our sins, eh?  This is a danger.  This is what is important: a theology of sin.  So many times I think of St. Peter: he committed one of the worst sins denying Christ.  And with this sin they made him Pope.  We must think about fact often.

But returning to your question more concretely: in this case [Ricca] I did the required investigation and we found nothing.  That is the first question.  Then you spoke of the gay lobby.  Agh… so much is written about the gay lobby.  I have yet to find on a Vatican identity card the word gay.  They say there are some gay people here.  I think that when we encounter a gay person, we must make the distinction between the fact of a person being gay and the fact of a lobby, because lobbies are not good.  They are bad.  If a person is gay and seeks the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge that person?  The Catechism of the Catholic Church explains this point beautifully but says, wait a moment, how does it say, it says, these persons must never be marginalized and “they must be integrated into society.”
The problem is not that one has this tendency; no, we must be brothers, this is the first matter.  There is another problem, another one: the problem is to form a lobby of those who have this tendency, a lobby of the greedy people, a lobby of politicians, a lobby of Masons, so many lobbies.  This is the most serious problem for me. And thank you so much for doing this question. Thank you very much!

That’s what the Pope said.

Did Francis, in those off-the-cuff comments on an airplane, reverse the Congregation for Catholic Education’s 2005 document restricting men with deeply ingrained, long-standing homosexual histories from priestly ordination?

Corollary: is that how official, dicasterial documents are reversed? In off-the-cuff comments?

What His Holiness said, when broken down, is this:

  1. there is a gay lobby in the Vatican,
  2. no one knows for sure who’s in it,
  3. we need to distinguish between homosexual priests working in the Curia who a) may be part of an insidious power-brokering careerist sham, b) are not part of any such cabal, but who, much like some of their heterosexual counterparts, sin and then seek absolution and want to amend their lives, c) are living chaste lives.

But Reese, and others who promote the homosexualist agenda, teased one clause into a reversal of a document: “The problem is not that one has this tendency…”.  

Here is what another document, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s 1986 Letter Homosexualitatis Problema 3, says:

“Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is a more or less strong tendency ordered toward an intrinsic moral evil; and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder“.

And in paragraph 10:

It is deplorable that homosexual persons have been and are the object of violent malice in speech or in action. Such treatment deserves condemnation from the Church’s pastors wherever it occurs. It reveals a kind of disregard for others which endangers the most fundamental principles of a healthy society. The intrinsic dignity of each person must always be respected in word, in action and in law.

But the proper reaction to crimes committed against homosexual persons should not be to claim that the homosexual condition is not disordered. When such a claim is made and when homosexual activity is consequently condoned, or when civil legislation is introduced to protect behavior to which no one has any conceivable right, neither the Church nor society at large should be surprised when other distorted notions and practices gain ground, and irrational and violent reactions increase.

At the end of the CDF’s Letter we find:

During an audience granted to the undersigned Prefect, His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, approved this Letter, adopted in an ordinary session of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and ordered it to be published.

What Reese and others who write agitprop for the MSM do is precisely what the CDF warns against.  Moreover, Reese pits one Pope against another (soon to be “Saint” John Paul II) and against two dicasteries of the Holy See.

What Pope Francis said in off the cuff remarks on an airplane to journalists is consistent with what the Church has been officially proposing to the world.

Furthermore, if Pope Francis wants to change something that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith or the Congregation for Catholic Education issued (or Cong. of Clergy, which now handles seminaries), he will do it in a way that is unambiguous.

Don’t hold your breath.

Notwithstanding what liberals and homosexualists dish up for for the MSM, Pope Francis is not going to say that strong homosexual inclinations are not ordered to something that is intrinsically evil, nor is he going to say that it’s okay for men to be admitted to holy orders whose homosexuality is deep-seated and long-standing.

Posted in Francis, Mail from priests, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, Seminarians and Seminaries, The Drill, What are they REALLY saying? | Tagged , , , , ,
69 Comments

For your Just Too Cool file and your TEOTWAWKI file!

For your Just Too Cool file and your TEOTWAWKI file for you more ambitious Catholic preppers.

Mass from a church truck!  A mobile chapel.  And it’s a Solemn Mass, to boot!

If I remember, didn’t Aid To The Church In Need do something like this too?

Pretty soon we might be reduced to this, after all the hate groups have sued the Church out of their property in most places.  But then the Obama Administration in its 4th term would then send his special Domestic Security Force to arrest people for unlawful assembly and the crime of not confining religion to behind closed doors.

Posted in Just Too Cool, TEOTWAWKI, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , ,
15 Comments