Of Devils and Agencies and Metadata and You

Long before the scandal about government snooping and gathering of metadata broke, I wrote a post (HERE) about Pope Francis’ mentions of the Devil, the Enemy of the soul.

Consider the way angels can gather “metadata” on us and build an accurate profile of each of us such that they pretty much anticipation what we think and will do even though they cannot read our minds or change our will.

Here’s an excerpt:

[Angels/devils] never sleep, never tire, are never distracted, have no need to travel from point a to b, and they never miss what you are up to.

Think this through.

Imagine what sort of profile on you some government agency could put together.

Imagine that government agencies wanted to build a psychological profile of you, much as the FBI might when they use clues and evidence to hunt down an unknown serial killer.

So these government agents … just to make this fun, let’s call it The Agency (under Obama’s fourth term), teamed up with his newly minted Domestic Security Force, are profiling Catholics… because they are probably terrorists and dissidents and refuse to worship Moloch and offer sacrifices of incense to the statue of the POTUS.

The Agency and DSF start to plot your movements through your mobile phone as you move in and out of cells which they monitor to triangulate your location.  They learn something about you through your patterns of travel.  They learn about your tastes and interests through your purchasing history.  They monitor your calls, where you go on the internet, what you write and read in your email and on webpages.  They look at all your online transactions. Through your credit card records they hunt up the actual receipts and examine what you bought at every store…  including those embarrassing things.
After all, you leave amazingly information-rich and detailed trails and clues to who you are with every move and purchase.

The Agency and DSF review all your library checkouts, your magazine subscriptions, your movie going habits, your DVD choices through Netflix or digital downloads through iTunes.  They watch your channel selections through your cable or satellite. All this information can be mined.  They watch your every interaction with your friends… and strangers too, for that matter, with listening devices and cameras.  After gathering all this information, the Agency’s profiling experts build a picture of you, get into your head.   They figure out what you are about, who you are, and what you going to do next.

They are merely humans with a lot of bits of information.

How much better can fallen angels, the demons do this?

Posted in Linking Back, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice |
5 Comments

Spare the rod and spoil the chant!

Over at NLM (now under new management) there is a fun entry about the baculus cantoralis.

The cliffnotes version:

The Baculus Cantoralis, to give it one of its many names, is a large staff held by a Choirmaster or Cantor which originates in Benedictine Monasteries of the 10th and 11th centuries. It is sometimes called a Baculus Choralis or a Baculus Praecentoris. At Solesmes, where it is still in use, it is referred to as Le Bâton de Chantre.

Now it is a ceremonial object, but once it was used to correct errant singers.

How often I have wanted something like a liturgical paintball gun when some singer on the other side of the sanctuary was drifting flat or ignoring proper dymanics.

Go to NLM to read the whole thing and see spiffy photos.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
12 Comments

Long lifetimes of faith and prayer

The other day I saw in the weekly newspaper of the Diocese of Madison that a religious sister was celebrating her 8oth anniversary of profession!  That’s impressive.

This also caught my eye today

‘Longest-serving’ cloistered nun dies in Spain
The Associated Press
MADRID —
A nun believed to hold the world record of 86 years cloistered in a monastery has died in Spain.

Sister Maria Romero, abbess of the Buenafuente del Sistal monastery northeast of Madrid said Wednesday that Sister Teresita Barajuen had died overnight. She was 105.

She entered the Cistercian monastery when she was 19, the abbess said.

Barajuen acknowledged in interviews that like many young women at the time, she never intended being a nun but entered the monastery because of family pressure.

In 2011, Barajuen left the monastery for the first time in 40 years to meet retired Benedict XVI during a papal visit to Madrid. She had entered the monastery on the same day he was born.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity, Women Religious | Tagged
23 Comments

CNA: Latin American religious backtrack on Pope and gay lobby

From CNA:

Latin American religious backtrack on Pope and gay lobby

Lima, Peru, Jun 12, 2013 / 10:45 am (CNA).- In response to media flurry, the Latin American Confederation of Men and Women Religious (CLAR) released a statement on June 11 claiming that the assertion of a gay lobby at the Vatican “cannot be attributed with certainty to the Holy Father.”

The news that Pope Francis acknowledged the existence of a gay lobby at the Vatican was published on Monday by the left-leaning Chilean Catholic portal “Reflexión y liberación” (Reflection and Liberation), claiming that it was an “exclusive” account of the private meeting between Pope Francis and the CLAR presidency, held on June 6.

According to “Reflexión y liberación,” Pope Francis told CLAR members that “there are holy people in the curia, truly, there are holy people. But there is also a current (stream) of corruption, there is one, it is true… there are words about a ‘gay lobby,’ and it is true, it is there… we have to see what can we do (about it).”

The same source claims that the Pope also said that “the reform of the Roman curia is something that almost all of us cardinals requested during the congregations previous to the conclave. I also did. I cannot personally make that reform, with these managerial issues… I am too unorganized; I have never been good at that. But the Cardinals of the committee will carry it out.”

According to the statement, CLAR “deeply regrets the publication of a text regarding the conversation held with the Holy Father Francis on June 6. The conversation developed upon the questions asked of the Pope by those present (at the meeting).”

The group added that “there was no recording made during the conversation but shortly after a summary was made based on the memories of the participants. This summary, which does not include the questions posed to the Holy Father, was intended at (helping) the personal memory of the participants and in no way for publication.”

Regarding the decision of “Reflexión y liberación” to publish the story, CLAR says that “in fact, no authorization was requested.

“It is clear that, based on these facts, it cannot be attributed with certainty to the Holy Father, the specific expression contained in the text, but only in its general sense.”

CNA attempted to contact CLAR’s secretary general, Fr. Gabriel Naranjo Salazar, who is currently in Rome, as well as the group’s president, Sr. Mercedes Leticia Casas Sánchez, FSpS, but did not receive a response by publication deadlines.

“Reflexión y Liberación,” based in Santiago (Chile), issued a June 12 statement defending its decision to publish the text.

“A few days ago, our magazine received a summary of what was the meeting of Pope Francis and CLAR’s directive,” it stated.

“We decided to publish it as a news story, without additional comments, just a brief introduction highlighting the importance of such meetings at the Holy See, not only for the Consecrated, but for all the People of God.”

It cited Matthew 10:27: “What I tell you in the darkness, speak in the light; and what you hear whispered in your ear, proclaim upon the housetops.”

Fr. Federico Lombardi, director of the Holy See Press Office, told CNA on June 11 that “(t)he meeting between the Holy Father and the presidency of CLAR was a meeting of a private nature.

“Therefore I have no comment to make about the content of the conversation,” he said.

Posted in Francis | Tagged ,
38 Comments

CWN: Liberal group sees ‘McCarthyism’ in criticism of CCHD

Some topics are like the proverbial “third rail”.  Touch it and DIE.

In the case of some topics, touch it and those involved in the thing you are touching KILL YOU.  Wellllll… they aggressively go after you from positions of power.

This has certainly been the case for some who have been so audacious as to touch the Catholic Campaign for Human Development.

The US bishops took some steps to reform the CCHD, which once – still?- had -has? connections to questionable groups (e.g., ACORN and the Industrial Areas Foundation).

Frankly, discussion of the controversial CCHD is as much of a fever swamp as discussion of some aspects of the SSPX.

I don’t like the fever swamp.

I will post the story but impose moderation on the comments.

From CWN:

Liberal group sees ‘McCarthyism’ in criticism of CCHD

Critics of the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD) are engaged in “McCarthyism” that interferes with the Church’s efforts to help the poor, according to a report from a Washington-based liberal group.

The CCHD, the official poverty-fighting effort of the US bishops’ conference, has drawn criticism for decades because of its ties to radical organizations that attack Church teachings on issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage. But a 24-page essay released by Faith in Public Life complains that these criticisms are examples of “guilt by association and other tactics from the McCarthy-era playbook.”

A small but well-financed network has emerged as a relentless opponent of the bishops’ social justice campaign, which has long been recognized as one of the most influential funders of grassroots community organizing,” charges the report.

The report, entitled “Be Not Afraid,” is endorsed by dozens of prominent Catholic individuals and organizations, including two past presidents of the US bishops’ conference: Archbishop Joseph Fiorenza of Houston and Bishop William Skylstad of Spokane (both now retired). The statement is also endorsed by a number of former staff members of the US bishops’ conference.

What a mess.

I am pretty sure that some US Dioceses do not take up collections for the CCHD.

FWIW.

Comment moderation is switched on.  Try to get your well thought out, pithy comment past Cerberus.

Posted in Liberals, The Drill, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , , , ,
37 Comments

Lighter Fare… not so much. POLL!

It’s starting to feel like this, isn’t it?

Be honest, now.   Has it crossed your mind?  Even in a fleeting way?

 

Since stories about US Govt data mining broke, I looked at my computer and wondered if I am being scrutinized.

View Results

Posted in I'm just askin'..., Liberals, Lighter fare, Pò sì jiù, POLLS, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,
52 Comments

LONDON: SPIRIT IN THE CITY – 12-15 June

Those of you in London and environs should keep in mind participating in “Spirit in the City“!

I am happy to plug this especially because of the involvement of the outstanding parish of my friend Fr. Sherbrooke of St. Patrick’s on Soho Square.

Click HERE and check out this great parish.  I have written about St. Patrick’s before HERE.

Posted in Just Too Cool, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , , ,
3 Comments

“NO! You may NOT do that!”

One of the main functions of the Church is to say “no”.

In saying “no” by the Ten Commandments, God the Father was not simply trying to ruin what would have otherwise been a good time in life.  He said “no” because, after the Fall, we tend to hurt ourselves.  Similarly, Holy Church, having Christ’s own authority to teach and govern, says “no” to things we do – or think- that actually hurt us rather than “free” us.

One of the things that hurt us, to which the Church says “no” is being a Freemason.

NO!  If you are Catholic you may NOT be a Mason.

From CNA:

French priest suspended after Freemasonry revealed

Paris, France, Jun 11, 2013 / 02:02 am (CNA).- Bishop Yves Boivineau of Annecy in southeastern France has barred a local priest from public ministry after he was exposed as an active Freemason.

Father Pascal Vesin, 43, was suspended for his active membership in a Masonic lodge of the Grand Orient of France. He became a member in 2001, five years after his 1996 ordination as a Catholic priest, the French newspaper Le Figaro reports.

The priest served a parish in the Alpine ski resort of Megeve and Bishop Boivineau suspended him at Rome’s request, his parish said.  [EHEM… the Bishop should have done that without having been requested… but let that pass for now…]

Membership in Masonic societies has long been condemned by the Catholic Church. This condemnation was repeated in a 1983 document from the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, which said Masonic principles “have always been considered irreconcilable with the doctrine of the Church.”

The faithful who enroll in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion,” [Get that?] the congregation said in a declaration signed by then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the future Pope Benedict XVI.

The disciplinary action against Fr. Vesin followed the priest’s refusal to renounce Freemasonry. [!]

The priest told Le Figaro that he did not choose to place Freemasonry against the Church. He said his action is “the expression of my absolute freedom of conscience within the Catholic institution.”  [Oh YAH?]

The diocese said that the priest’s suspension is not final and can be lifted. It described it as a “medicinal” penalty intended to encourage the priest’s return to Catholic practice.

The Catholic Church has opposed Freemasonry on account of its secret nature, its religious indifferentism and its history of conspiring against the Church.

A 1985 letter to the U.S. bishops by then-Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Bernard Law criticized Freemasonry’s dedication to a form of “naturalistic” religion that is “incompatible with Christian faith and practice.”

It seems to me that some aspects are worse than “naturalistic”.

So… NO!  You may NOT be a Freemason.

Posted in Mail from priests, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , , ,
51 Comments

VERY COOL PRIEST with a SUPER COOL IDEA for HARD IDENTITY Catholicism

Yes, this one got me a little excited.

In the past I have posted about a very cool priest, Fr. Richard Heilman, pastor of glorious Pine Bluff, WI. You may recall that he founded a group called the Knights of Divine Mercy and that some months ago he switched to celebrating Mass ad orientem exclusively.

Fr. Heilman just celebrated his 25th anniversary, btw!

When they hauled the versus populum altar out of the church and into the rectory, I posted this:

Months later, here is an update.

I went to a celebration at the parish for Father’s 25th anniversary.  He wanted to show me what he did with that altar they hauled out of the church to the rectory.

As you step into the front door of the rectory, there is a small vestibule with three doors.  To the center, you enter the house.  I’ll get to the left in a moment.

To the right, you find this!

20130610-162756.jpg

The Blessed Sacrament is present with the permission of the local bishop.

He put clear appliques on the windows.

20130610-162802.jpg

There are a couple chairs and kneelers.

“But Father! But Father!” you might be chirruping.  “What behind the door to the left!”

Father Heilman’s office.

But with a difference.

He has installed a small confessional window in the door of his office and placed a kneeler in the small vestibule across from the little chapel.

20130610-162816.jpg

This means that people can come to the rectory for confession pretty much at any time when Father is at home or, at least, in his office, and they can then pray before the the Eucharistic Lord and do their penance.

The outer door to the rectory will be rigged up soon with a wireless intercom and locking/unlocking gizmo.

20130610-162900.jpg

When someone comes into that little vestibule, it will be as if they are in a confessional.  Father than then zip over from the desk to the door on his rolling chair, open the window (there is an obscuring barrier for anonymity), and hear the penitent!

Like so!

20130610-162832.jpg

But wait!  THERE’S MORE!

If that wasn’t cool enough….

Father has developed an app for his confession availability!   MyConfessor!

People can see on the app whether Father is available.  There is a description/bio of the priest, there is a good Examination of Conscience and helpful prayers.

20130610-162823.jpg

Father can, from his desktop, switch his status to available/not available.  He can also do so from his own mobile device if need be.

20130610-162828.jpg

But WAIT!  THERE’S MORE!

By linking with Google Maps, and when other priests get this app working, you will be able to see drop pins for priests hearing confessions by their availability!

Think about another way to use this app.

Perhaps I, who travel a lot, am in – say – an airport for a long layover.  I am stuck at gate X8472 waiting for my flight.  I get out my phone, open MyConfessor, pin myself at Gate X8472 and switch my status to available.  While there are problems of anonymity and lack of a grate, etc. (I never hear confessions without a grate of some kind), most priests who travel in their black clothes and collar have heard confessions on the fly.  Another scenario, World Youth Day… a conference… a rally.  It is at least an interesting idea to tweak.

The very cool Fr. Heilman as viewed from near his desk.

The door behind him is the little chapel.  The door to his left is the front, outside door to the rectory.

20130610-162810.jpg

He even said he wouldn’t mind getting up in the night were someone to ring.

(FYI – He also has a really big dog in the house.)

What great zeal and creative use of tech!

Ultimate Fr Z Kudos and congratulations.

UPDATE:

To be clear the APP is NOT YET FUNCTIONAL.  The kinks are being straightened out.

I will update you.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS, GO TO CONFESSION, Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , ,
61 Comments

Wherein I write of Requiem Masses, of death and prudence and perennial wisdom

I had a useful and edifying experience today.  In a way what happened today dovetails with what I experienced a week or so ago when I carried the Blessed Sacrament for Corpus Christi in the streets of Manhattan.  But I’ll stick to today.

This morning I was celebrant for a sung Requiem Mass.  The deceased was a long time reader of this blog who had an connection with one of the parishes in these parts where we regularly have Traditional Latin Masses.  While he, Lawrence, and his wife had moved away from the area, he still visited often and, when he did, he continued to frequent TLMs at the same parish.  Thus, Monsignor the Rector welcomed them when the widow communicated the man’s request that we have a sung Requiem and I was only too happy to oblige as celebrant.

This was a different experience for most of the people present, as you can imagine.

During the course of the Mass, which went pretty much without a hitch, I found some helpful insights, perhaps because I am now comfortable with the rites to the point where I can focus on what is really going on.

For example, for a Requiem the sermon is to be preached after the rites are concluded, and only with permission of the Ordinary.

Thus, after the reading/singing of the Gospel there is no sermon.  A funeral oration is preached without the preacher even wearing a surplice. (Cf. Fortescue/O’Connell/Reid, p. 462; Collins, p. 273; Trimeloni, 588, AAS 9 (1917): “21. Elogia funebria nemini recitare fas esto nisi praevio et explicito consensu Ordinarii, qui quidem, antequam consensum praebeat, poterit etiam exigere ut sibi manuscriptum exhibeatur.” About the lack of stole, but legitimate use of the ferraiuolone or religious habit, etc., SCR 2888:1.)  It is extra-liturgical. I obtained from the Ordinary ahead of time permission to preach both for myself or for the rector (just in case).  This was in force in 1962 and, by the provisions of Universae Ecclesiae for Summorum Pontificum, we obey the law in force at the time.  Therefore, I obtained permission and the discourse was after the Absolution rite.

This all makes so much sense.  Think about how in small towns or in large cities alike, controversial neighbors or public figures die and all manner of absurdities or unkind things or political things or scandalous gossipy things are said in a eulogy or oration.  I suppose an Ordinary Bishop could by particular law grant blanket permission to preach on these occasions, but that seems to me to be a bad idea.  Prudence!  In many dioceses today eulogies are forbidden at Masses for the sorts of reasons we all know to be true.

Furthermore, the vector of the Mass, the solemn prayers, is not broken up by more or less good preaching wherein Father or the Bishop suddenly becomes the object of everyone’s attention.  We remain on target, focused on our purpose in church today.

For another example, in the funeral discourse after the rites were concluded, Monsignor the Rector pointed out the obvious – that there was no choice of music or readings in our traditional requiem. He added, however, that this lack of options underscores how we are all the same in facing our death and judgment.

That got me thinking.  Holy Mother Church is the greatest expert on humanity there has ever been.  For centuries we learned how to pray at the time of death and burial, for the deceased and for ourselves.  The Requiem, properly celebrated, has what we need: the proper balance of prayer and silence, of action and still waiting, of grandeur and sobriety, of imploring mercy, of harrowing reminders of our own judgement, of surety of God’s mercy when asked and hope for the glories of heaven to come.  Death, even when it comes suddenly, isn’t exactly a surprise.  It’s coming.  The solemn rites, perennially repeated, place us in line with our forebears.  Though we are all precious in the eyes of God, we aren’t “special cases” who get to have tailor-made rites by which someone can choose to emphasize x or avoid saying y.  We are equal in death.

“But Father! But Father!”, some of you are surely blurting.  “You hate Vatican II, don’t you?  All those poor people in the church couldn’t understand anything!  How were they expected to participate?  You didn’t let them celebrate his life!  You are mean.”

First, everyone did just fine.  We went straight at the traditional Requiem with no hesitation or apologies.  We gave everyone booklets.  We followed the rites.  At Communion, we had arranged for someone to go to the rail ahead of time and kneel and receive on the tongue so people could see right off what to do.  When some people weren’t sure exactly where to go, I made a simple gesture that they should come down to the end and then kneel at the rail.  No rushing, no problems.  Everyone received on the tongue without a hitch.  It went smoothly.  Afterwards, I had a chance to talk to a few people, including the widow.   Though they had never seen anything like this before, they all thought it was beautiful.  Some mentioned how reverent it all seemed.

Moreover, they all knew they were praying for Lawrence, the deceased.

Please, dear readers, pray for the soul of Lawrence, who died recently.  He was one of you, one the regular readers here.

Eternal rest grant unto him, O Lord.
And let perpetual light shine upon him.
May he rest in peace.
Amen.
May his soul and the souls of all the faithful departed,
through the mercy of God, rest in peace.
Amen.

Lastly….

Please go to confession.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Four Last Things, GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , , , , ,
26 Comments