Brick by Brick! Bishop by Bishop!

From a reader:

I thought you might like to know that the Auxiliary Bishop of
Indianapolis, Bishop Christopher Coyne, celebrated an ad orientem Anglican Use Mass with Confirmations and a First Communion. Here is a link to the info: HERE

You have written about Bishop Coyne before when he blogged about why he didn’t go to Confession to a priest who used the wrong words at Mass. He has also celebrated Confirmations in the EF.

Full Fr. Z Kudos to Bp. Coyne!

Indeed I have written about him before. HERE

The New Evangelization in concrete terms.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Fr. Z KUDOS, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
21 Comments

QUAERITUR: Indulgences for 1st Blessings by priests… again

From a reader about to be ordained:

About a month ago you blogged that new priest blessings don’t specifically have indulgences attached to them and recommended future ordinands ask their bishop to send a letter to the apostolic penitentiary so that a partial indulgence would be attached to it.

I’m a religious who will be ordained this year so I asked my major superior (ordinary). He liked the idea and asked me to prepare a letter. Since I’m not too clear on what needed to be in it, I asked a priest I considered much wiser on said points. He responded that all blessings already contain a partial indulgence so there’s no need to ask but we could send a not just to be sure. Do all blessings contain partial indulgences?

(And while you’re at it, it may be nice if you included what we who will be ordained should include in such letters.)

Superiors should know what they are supposed to do.

Firstly, there is a plenary indulgence given to the faithful who assist devoutly at the first Mass of a priest (and also as his 25, 50, 60 and 70 year anniversaries – Enchiridion Indulgentiarum, art. 27).

I find nothing in the Enchiridion that says a recipient of any priestly blessing can receive a partial indulgence. Perhaps that  priest could supply that citation.  I think Father is wrong.

The faithful can receive a partial indulgence through the pious use of an object blessed by a priest (Enchiridion, 14).

There is nothing about merely receiving an invocative blessing that enables one to receive an indulgence.

May I suggest a good review of the Enchiridion?  You (and all priests) should be familiar with it for priestly ministry. The Enchiridion provides the information you need to include in the letter you wrote about.

NB: A major superior cannot grant an indulgence unless he has been expressly given this power by the Roman Pontiff (can. 995). The law permits diocesan bishops the right to grant partial indulgences to their subjects (Enchiridion 7).

The letter granting the indulgence should be written by the diocesan bishop. It would be appropriate for the major superior to request this indulgence from the diocesan bishop on behalf of the priests under his charge.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

Mass in the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite… right.

From a reader:

This evening, I attended mass in the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite. The mass was at ___.

Several things were different than what one experiences at most masses in the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite. 1.) Mass was ad orientem. 2.) Father wore Roman vestments. 3.) Holy Communion by Host only. 4.) No EMHC in this parish, The celebrant was assisted by another priest.  5.) No altar girls. 6.) No sign of Peace among the congregation. Holy Communion kneeling at an altar rail ( a few exceptions), with father going from left to right several times . There were well over a 100 receiving Communion. 7.) Very little touchdown gestures when praying.

Even though they are the same mass and without  the above exceptions, the Ad Orientem presentation is in a different world than the Versus Populum presentation.

I would venture to say that those who only attend mass in their Novus Ordo Parish would not believe they were attending an Ordinary Form mass if the mass was said Ad Orientem. Even in the language that they normally hear it.

A few points.

When Mass according to the Novus Ordo is celebrated well and in a traditional Roman style, it can be less different from the older, traditional form than Masses according to the  Novus Ordo celebrated at parishes near each other.

Also, I would wager that the priest(s) at that parish at some point learned the older, tradition form of the Roman Rite.  In turn, that experience has produced a knock-on effect in their use of the Ordinary Form.  In turn, again, a knock-on effect will result in the congregation.  The way we pray has a reciprocal relationship with what we believe.

Distribution of Holy Communion at an altar rail is more efficient and more reverent.

Ad orientem worship must be revived.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
57 Comments

“Wake Up! Religious Liberty at Risk in USA”

From CNSNews:

Catholic Archbishop: Wake Up! Religious Liberty at Risk in USA

(CNSNews.com) – Roman Catholic Archbishop Charles J. Chaput is calling on Americans to wake up [Is it too late?  We must keep working.] and recognize that the Founding Fathers’ vision of religious freedom is now threatened by the federal government. [The Obama Administration, Dems & RINO’s in Congress, Justices, etc.]

The day when Americans could take the Founders’ understanding of religious freedom as a given is over,” said the archbishop. “We need to wake up.”  [If that is the case, then we are on the brink of persecution.]

[…]

“[T]he HHS mandate can only be understood as a form of coercion,” the archbishop wrote in a recent column posted on the website of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia. The column is entitled, “Religious Freedom and the Need to Wake Up.”

[…]

The archbishop went on to observe that abortion advocates use fraudulent language in describing their position.

“The fraud at the heart of our nation’s ‘reproductive rights’ vocabulary runs very deep and very high,” he wrote. “In his April 26 remarks to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the president never once used the word ‘abortion,’ despite the ongoing Kermit Gosnell trial in Philadelphia and despite Planned Parenthood’s massive role in the abortion industry.”

The archbishop noted that the scandal “involving IRS targeting of ‘conservative’ organizations … also has a religious dimension.”

“But the latest IRS ugliness,” he wrote, “is a hint of the treatment disfavored religious groups may face in the future, if we sleep through the national discussion of religious liberty now. The day when Americans could take the Founders’ understanding of religious freedom as a given is over. We need to wake up.”

I cut out a lot, so read the rest there.

Posted in Cri de Coeur, Emanations from Penumbras, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , , ,
18 Comments

NFL player refused White House visit because Pres. Obama said “God bless you Planned Parenthood”

The MSM drooled all over itself when some barely known NBA player said he was a homosexual. Pres. Obama gave him a call. Ain’t that sweet?

Will the MSM take up this story too?

From the Washington Examiner.

NFL champ skips WH visit because Obama said ‘God bless’ Planned Parenthood

Retired Baltimore Ravens center Matt Birk, who won a Super Bowl with the team last year, skipped the team’s visit to the White House due to President Obama’s support for Planned Parenthood.

“I have great respect for the office of the presidency but about five or six weeks ago, our president made a comment in a speech and he said, ‘God bless Planned Parenthood,’” Birk, a former Minnesota Viking, told a local Minnesota sports blog. “I’m very confused by [Obama’s] statement,” he explained. “”For God to bless a place where they’re ending 330,000 lives a year? I just chose not to attend.”

Kirk said he’s a pro-life Roman Catholic. “Planned Parenthood performs about 330,000 abortions a year,” he said. “I couldn’t endorse that in any way.”

Obama spoke at the national Planned Parenthood conference this year.

“As long as we’ve got to fight to make sure women have access to quality, affordable health care, and as long as we’ve got to fight to protect a woman’s right to make her own choices about her own health, I want you to know that you’ve also got a president who’s going to be right there with you, fighting every step of the way,” he said. “Thank you, Planned Parenthood. God bless you. God bless America.”

What an appalling thing to say. What an abomination.

I wonder if POTUS will call this fellow and compliment him for taking his principled public stand.

UPDATE:

For another take check out The Motley Monk’s comments over at The American Catholic.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity, Religious Liberty, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
40 Comments

Bp. Paprocki in a hostile crowd tells it like it is

There is a useful RSS feed widget on the side bar of this blog which reveals what the Cardinal Newman Society is up to these days.  Check it out.

Using that feed, I found their article on what happened in Phoenix when Bp. Paprocki of Springfield, Illinois, found himself in a hostile crowd.

Here is the first part.

Bishop Paprocki Faces Hostile Jesuit Alumni Group at Talk

Springfield, Ill. Bishop Thomas Paprocki faced a hostile Jesuit alumni group during a May talk on the Church’s teachings on homosexuality, reports LifeSiteNews. Two thousand members of the Jesuit Alumni in Arizona – graduates of 28 Jesuit universities and 47 Jesuit high schools, now living in Arizona – sponsored the event at Phoenix’s Shadow Rock United Church of Christ. [Gosh!  Hard to imagine that people educated by modern Jesuits would wind up reviling their Catholic Faith.  Gosh!] It featured talks by Bishop Paprocki and dissenting New Ways Ministry leader Sister Jeannine Gramick. [One of the infamous NUNS GONE WILD!] Bishop Paprocki defended the Church’s teachings on homosexuality before a hostile crowd, and shared that his own secretary had been murdered by a homosexual activist.

During his talk, which argued in favor of traditional marriage, Bishop Paprocki received heckling and insults from the crowd.

While the event was titled “Two Catholic Views on Marriage,” Bishop Paprocki corrected that error.

“There is only one authentic Catholic view,” said Bishop Paprocki. “There are two views being presented here tonight by two people who are baptized Catholics, but only one of those views, the one I will present, is consistent with Catholic teaching, while the other view clearly dissents from Catholic teaching.”

Bishop Paprocki began by telling the crowd how his secretary, a mother of four, had been murdered by a homosexual man after she suggested that he change his lifestyle.

Said Bishop Paprocki:

[…]

Check out the rest over there.

UPDATE

I am reminded of Dr. Maturin’s comments on Jesuits.  HERE

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, O'Brian Tags, One Man & One Woman, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,
37 Comments

CRI DE COEUR: “If there were no more priests hardly anyone would be crying about it.”

At Rorate I saw something (translated there from Italian) from the blog Radicati nella fede, for the Catholic community of Domodossola and Vocogno in the Diocese of Novara.

This is a cri de coeur, if there ever was one.

My emphases and comments.  Original HERE.

The greatest crisis of the Priesthood in the history of the Church

Nobody is crying

If there were no more priests hardly anyone would be crying about it. This is the sad statement that we have to make.

We are witnessing the greatest crisis of the priesthood in the history of the Church. Whole areas in Europe are now without priests and all is hushed up. You do not even hear a single bishop raise the alarm, weeping with the faithful, asking everyone to pray intensely for priestly vocations and ordering fasting with ardent supplications that the Lord may have mercy on His people. [In France there are towns with thousands of people and no priests.  Some French priests have dozens of parishes!]

It is true, you will hear bishops and heads of curia describing the numbers of this dizzying drop in the presence of priests in the Church. You will hear them calmly – too calmly – drawing up a list of the information in a detached manner as if it were a situation to accept just as a matter of course – in fact, the chance for a new Church – more of the people.

In the coming years, in Italy, land of Christian antiquity, we will witness the disappearance of parishes and some [radical] changes, unthinkable even a few years ago, in the simplest structures of Catholicism, of parish communities, where Christian life was [once] natural for everyone. But the absolute majority of busy Catholics will pretend nothing is happening, because their pastors are already doing so.  [And some of the bishops there are among the more radically liberal I have ever heard of.  What some of them do to priests of a traditional stripe is dreadful.  And yet there is a crisis in the number of priests there.]

It is a “ catastrophe”, an “earthquake” – but nobody is crying about it – there is a pretence [sic] that nothing is happening. There is a pretence that nothing is happening because the fairytale of the Council’s “springtime” must continue. Any historical verification and evidence of a crisis without precedent are denied.

And a less than Catholic-like future is being prepared for us. [My old pastor, the late Msgr. Schuler, when hearing from the chancery about how in the future there wouldn’t be enough priests, likened the situation to the Irish potato crop failure that caused so many to starve.  He suggested new approaches and used them himself for vocations (30 1st Masses in 33 years as pastor of the parish).  Instead, the powers-that-were – stuck in their rut of the same-old-same-old (liberal rubbish) sat around talking about how to starve together rather than planting new and different crops.  It’s enough to make you crazy. One of the fundamental criticisms Schuler had of the seminary faculty at that time was that they couldn’t answer three questions: Who is Jesus Christ? Who is the Church? Who is the priest?]

“Restructuring” the organization of Christian communities is already being discussed, i.e. creating space for the lay people (as if they never had enough of it in these past years) [!] and a new type of Christian faithful is being invented who will become the administrators in the parishes and will replace the priests. Lay faithful, duly “clericalized”, will maintain the churches and while waiting for a Mass, they, like adult Christians, will do the preaching of the Word…

…yet nobody is crying about it – nobody is praying and crying out to God.  [Remember: No priests, no Eucharist.]

Perhaps they are not crying out because someone has been preparing this upheaval in the Church for some years now.  [The Italian actually has “terremotto”, “earthquake”.]

They have debased the Catholic priesthood, transforming priests from men of God into social workers for the community. [That is an important point.  Priests are just functionaries tasked with mundane or temporal duties, even honorable duties concerning works of mercy.  Were they, then anyone could fill the job.] They have reduced the breviary and prayer. They have imposed secular dress so that the priests are like everyone else. [When I was in seminary in the USA you could be questioned for wearing black pants.  We were actually forbidden to use the word “priest”, which we called “the p-word”. We were to use the term “ordained ministers”, in order to break down the distinction between the priesthood of the ordained and the common priesthood of the baptized.] Priests were told to keep up with the times because the world was moving forward. They were also told not to stress their own importance, but to share their responsibilities with the faithful.  [How condescending.  That is tantamount to telling lay people “You aren’t good enough on your own, so I will let you do things that I can do.”]

And the final blow: priests were given a Mass that has become the preparation for the catastrophe in the Church.  [The translation is not uniformly great:  “E come colpo di grazia gli hanno dato una messa che è diventata la prova generale del cataclisma nella Chiesa… And as the coup de grâce (mortal blow) they gave them a Mass that became the dress rehearsal for the catastrophe in the Church…”  But the general drift is conveyed adequately.] No longer deep prayer; no longer adoration of God Who is present. [I don’t think those two points are entirely fair.] There is no longer intimate union with the propitiatory sacrifice of Christ on the Cross, [The deemphasis of the sacrificial aspect was truly disastrous.] but, instead, there is a holy supper with the community. [Not entirely, but… the Novus Ordo is prone to that imposition.  That’s a problem.  It doesn’t have to go that way, if the priest has his head on straight.  But given the lousy seminary prep and the persecution for decades by some bishops and priests, the Novus Ordo, susceptible to aberrations, is often way off course.] Everything is centered on man – not on God – and a lot of extenuating talk about building community. [Instead, Mass needs to build an encounter with Mystery and help people prepare to die and be judged.] It is a Mass which is a constant coming and going of lay people on and off the altar, a training for that coming and going of ladies and gentlemen who will shortly be running our ex-parishes without priests.

With the “worldly” Mass, the universal priesthood of the lay faithful has been cultivated and its meaning twisted. The baptized are a priestly people inasmuch as they offer themselves in sacrifice, in union with Christ crucified, offering all of their life with Jesus. The faithful must sanctify themselves; this is the universal priesthood of the baptized. The faithful do not participate in the Holy Orders of the priesthood, which are of an other nature and conform to the Priesthood of Christ. It is through the Sacrament of Holy Orders that Christ renders Himself present in the grace of the sacraments. If there were no more priests, both the Church and the grace of the sacraments would come to an end.

Martin Luther and Protestantism did exactly this: they destroyed the Catholic priesthood by saying that everyone was a “priest”, underlining specifically the universal priesthood of the laity.

In the matter of restructuring parishes, things might end up like that.

It might have been different to confront this crisis with minds and hearts holding the priesthood in high esteem, with the knowledge that the priest is one of the greatest gifts for the Church and all people. But this has not been the case. The crisis will be dealt with after years of total confusion in the lives of the clergy; after years of being unaccustomed to daily Mass and Catholic doctrine. [“I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom: preach the word, be urgent in season and out of season, convince, rebuke, and exhort, be unfailing in patience and in teaching. For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander into myths. As for you, always be steady, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfil your ministry.” 2 Tim 4:1-5] So the faithful will do without the priest. This is already happening. And when a priest arrives, they will not have a clue what to do with him, having become accustomed to the belief that the Lord will save them without priests and sacraments. [I’ll tell you what they often do: they turn on him when he does what he is supposed to do.]

We think it is not right to pretend that nothing is happening.

This is the reason we are asking our faithful to pray fervently to the Lord, so that He will grant a lot of priests to His Church, as He once did.

Dear faithful, in this month of June, which is the time dedicated to Holy Orders, let us have the courage to ask for this grace, even with tears, to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

And let us cling to the most precious gift of the Mass of all time – the Mass of Tradition. It is only this Mass that will give new priests to the Church of the Lord.

Reason #… 3? for Summorum Pontificum.

The New Evangelization cannot take off without a revitalization of our liturgical life.  The older form of Mass is necessary to help this revitalization.

The New Evangelization cannot take off without strong priests who know who they are and are faithful to Holy Church’s teachings.  The older form of Mass can promote vocations and clearer priestly identity.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Cri de Coeur, Mail from priests, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, Priests and Priesthood, Seminarians and Seminaries, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices, Vatican II, Vocations, Year of Faith | Tagged , , , ,
112 Comments

ATTENTION PRIESTS

I belong to a group of priests who get together for a few days each summer.  Because I have mentioned this on the blog for the last couple years, several priests from different areas of North America have been able to join us.  Several bishops belong to the group, though – understandably – they have a hard time making it.

This year, we are meeting from 21-25 July.  We will be joined by His Excellency Most Rev. Robert C. Morlino, the indomitable Bishop of Madison.

Drop me a line, Fathers, if you are interested in more info.  Use the email link on the top menu or go HERE.

We now have our location finalized, in Wisconsin, not too far from a couple decent airports.  Nice location!  And those of you who play golf might think about bringing clubs.

Posted in Priests and Priesthood, The Campus Telephone Pole |
Comments Off on ATTENTION PRIESTS

IRS bullying of conservatives and pro-lifers

Biretta tip to the pro-life blog of Jill Stanek (who recently linked to me, so I am returning the favor!).

As you know, the IRS has been targeting and harassing conservatives. I wouldn’t be surprised if this came from the Oval Office, but we don’t have proof of that… yet. Here is a video of testimony about the Obama Administration’s bullying of one group.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

The IRS required this group not to picket Planned Parenthood.

Just one example.

Remember: The IRS will be dealing with Obamacare.

This is the same Administration, the OBAMA Administration, that required Verizon to turn over their phone call logs.

From Hell’s Bible:

U.S. Is Secretly Collecting Records of Verizon Calls

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is secretly carrying out a domestic surveillance program under which it is collecting business communications records involving Americans under a hotly debated section of the Patriot Act, according to a highly classified court order disclosed on Wednesday night.

The order, signed by Judge Roger Vinson of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in April, directs a Verizon Communications subsidiary, Verizon Business Network Services, to turn over “on an ongoing daily basis” to the National Security Agency all call logs “between the United States and abroad” or “wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls.”

Even The Fishwrap seems upset. HERE

Do you remember Pres. Obama’s call for a domestic security force? HERE

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Liberals, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , ,
16 Comments

1st Friday: Feast of the Sacred Heart – Note for NYC! Great spiritual opportunity!

Tomorrow, a First Friday, is the Feast of the Sacred Heart.  That doesn’t happen all that often!

The Feast of the Sacred Heart is, I believe, the only Feast that Our Lord Himself requested!

I hope your parish will have special Masses.

Those of you in NYC or environs will want to go to the Church of the Holy Innocents in Manhattan for Mass with the 1962 Missale Romanum.  The music will be Gregorian chant for the day and some motets.

The Mass is follow by their usual 1st Friday Vigil, for example:

  • 6 pm – Solemn Mass (TLM)
  • Exposition after Mass till 5 am
  • Recitation of Consecration to the Sacred Heart
  • Stations of the Cross
  • 9 pm – Vespers and Compline
  • through the night recitation of approved Litanies
  • through the night Scriptural Rosary
  • 3 am – Divine Mercy Chaplet
  • 5 am – Sung Mass, Votive of the Immaculate Heart of Mary

Holy Innocents in on 37th (between 7th Ave and Broadway – near Herald Square).

 

Posted in SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
12 Comments