Pope Francis on the Devil, modern education “horrors”, mother and father families

Today the Pope spoke during his non-Magisterial, off-the-cuff fervorino at morning Mass in strong terms not just about generic, impersonal “evil”, but about the Enemy of your soul, the Devil.

From VR:

“We too are tempted, we too are the target of attacks by the devil because the spirit of Evil does not want our holiness, he does not want our Christian witness, he does not want us to be disciples of Christ. And what does the Spirit of Evil do, through his temptations, to distance us from the path of Jesus? The temptation of the devil has three characteristics and we need to learn about them in order not to fall into the trap. What does Satan do to distance us from the path of Jesus? Firstly, his temptation begins gradually but grows and is always growing. Secondly, it grows and infects another person, it spreads to another and seeks to be part of the community. And in the end, in order to calm the soul, it justifies itself. It grows, it spreads and it justifies itself.”

[…]

“We are all tempted because the law of our spiritual life, our Christian life is a struggle: a struggle. That’s because the Prince of this world, Satan, doesn’t want our holiness, he doesn’t want us to follow Christ. Maybe some of you might say: ‘But Father, how old fashioned you are to speak about the devil in the 21st century!’ [“But Father! But Father!…”] But look out because the devil is present! The devil is here… even in the 21st century! And we mustn’t be naïve, right? We must learn from the Gospel how to fight against Satan.”

Also today, the Pope spoke about clerical sexual abuse, appropriate given how he started off the morning.   VR:

Pope Francis also spoke about the need to reaffirm the rights of parents [NOT the state!] to decide “the moral and religious education of their children” and reject all forms of “educational experimentation with children and young people”.

He said that it is every child’s right to grow up in a family “with a father and a mother[Get that?  With a FATHER and a MOTHER.  Not two mothers, not a father and three mothers…. and a goat….] capable of creating “a suitable environment for the child’s development and emotional maturity”. [Some other environments are less suitable, and some are just unsuitable.] The Pope also called for an end to what he termed as “educational experiments” with children and young people, pushing a “dictatorship of one form of thinking” on them in the name of a pretended “modernity”.

The Pope noted that the “horrors of the manipulation of education that we experienced in the great genocidal dictatorships of the twentieth century have not disappeared; [Like Marxism and Nazism.] they have retained a current relevance under various guises and proposals”.

Moreover, the Pope gave a strong speech today about the sanctity of human life.  HERE

A friend in Rome sent texts to me saying:

The pope gave two speeches today which are likely to be his most outspoken in favor of natural marriage, freedom of education and against abortion so far. Nice that he mentioned natural marriage and sexuality in the same address he mentioned sexual abuses by the clergy. I found his argument vs abortion to be bizarre in its merely socioeconomic implications but I’ll take it.

Now let’s see how MSM and ‘c’atholics react. Spin and evasion I suspect.  ….

The pope basically called modern education an Orwellian social experiment like with the Nazi and the Soviet only w/out the uniforms.

I want to see MSW calling Francis a paranoid right winger now.

Heh.

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", Four Last Things, Francis | Tagged , , ,
21 Comments

AUDIO Stations of the Cross: Benedict XVI, Bl. John Henry Newman, St. Alphonsus Liguori

Over the years I have made several audio versions of the Stations of the Cross.

For your convenience, here they are.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, PODCAzT | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,
7 Comments

ITE, RODENTES! Talk about drama!

I just want to say to all of the supports of the North Dakota (arrogant effete) Sioux, just defeated by the (noble scholar athlete) Gophers, a big “thanks” and “neener neener”.

The Golden Gophers are in the Final!

Justin Holl unleashed euphoric reactions across the entire state of Minnesota by scoring an unlikely shorthanded goal with less than a second remaining [!!!] in Thursday night’s Frozen Four semifinal against long-time rival North Dakota to give Minnesota a 2-1 victory and a berth in the National Championship game, the 12th in program history.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

And now we shall have a SING ALONG!

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Here is the Minnesota March, written by John Philip Sousa. I’ll bet your school doesn’t have a march written by Sousa (there are a few).

The words for the interactive part…. EVERYBODY!

RAH! RAH! SKI-U-MAH! RAH! RAH! RAH! [SKI is pronounced like “sky”.  It just is.  Don’t question me.]

March on, march on to victory!
Loyal sons of the varsity.
Fight on, fight on for Minnesota
For the glory of the old maroon and gold.

March on, march on to win the game,
DOWN THE FIELD! [Or “down the ice”] Fighting every play.
We’re with you, team, fighting team,
Hear our song, we cheer along
To help you win a victory!

 

 

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged ,
21 Comments

Krauthammer on the Thought Police

NRO has this piece, which is spot on:

Thought Police on Patrol
No longer trying to win the debate, the Left is trying to stop debate altogether.
By Charles Krauthammer

Two months ago, a petition bearing more than 110,000 signatures was delivered to the Washington Post demanding a ban on any article questioning global warming. The petition arrived the day before publication of my column, which consisted of precisely that heresy.

The column ran as usual. But I was gratified by the show of intolerance because it perfectly illustrated my argument that the Left is entering a new phase of ideological agitation — no longer trying to win the debate but stopping debate altogether, banishing from public discourse any and all opposition.

The proper word for that attitude is totalitarian. It declares certain controversies over and visits serious consequences — from social ostracism to vocational defenestration — upon those who refuse to be silenced. [Yep.]

Sometimes the word comes from on high, as when the president of the United States declares the science of global warming to be “settled.” Anyone who disagrees is then branded “anti-science.” And better still, a “denier” — a brilliantly chosen calumny meant to impute to the climate skeptic the opprobrium normally reserved for the hatemongers and crackpots who deny the Holocaust.

Then last week, another outbreak. The newest closing of the leftist mind is on gay marriage. Just as the science of global warming is settled, so, it seems, are the moral and philosophical merits of gay marriage.

To oppose it is nothing but bigotry, akin to racism. Opponents are to be similarly marginalized and shunned, destroyed personally and professionally.

Like the CEO of Mozilla who resigned under pressure just ten days into his job when it was disclosed that six years earlier he had donated to California’s Proposition 8, which defined marriage as between a man and a woman.

But why stop with Brendan Eich, the victim of this high-tech lynching? Prop 8 passed by half a million votes. Six million Californians joined Eich in the crime of “privileging” traditional marriage. So did Barack Obama. In that same year, he declared that his Christian beliefs made him oppose gay marriage.

Yet under the new dispensation, this is outright bigotry. By that logic, the man whom the Left so ecstatically carried to the White House in 2008 was equally a bigot.

The whole thing is so stupid as to be unworthy of exegesis. There is no logic. What’s at play is sheer ideological prejudice — and the enforcement of the new totalitarian norm that declares, unilaterally, certain issues to be closed.

To this magic circle of forced conformity, the Left would like to add certain other policies, resistance to which is deemed a “war on women.” It’s a colorful synonym for sexism. Leveling the charge is a crude way to cut off debate.

Thus, to oppose late-term abortion is to make war on women’s “reproductive health.” Similarly, to question Obamacare’s mandate of free contraception for all.

Some oppose the regulation because of its impingement on the free exercise of religion. Others on the simpler (non-theological) grounds of a skewed hierarchy of values. Under the new law, everything is covered, but a few choice things are given away free. To what does contraception owe its exalted status? Why should it rank above, say, antibiotics for a sick child, for which that same mother must co-pay?

Say that, however, and you are accused of denying women “access to contraception.”

[…]

Read the rest there.

This is how the Left operates, within the Church as well. I have never seen such narrow-minded despotism as that manifested by liberals: priests, religious, prelates in positions of authority. Just challenge them and see what happens.

I hope the Olympian Middle will not drift into their tactics.  I am not sanguine.

Where is this going? Krauthammer’s evocation of 1984ish “thought police” is probably where this is going.

I refer you also to the final book of Michael O’Brien’s Children of the Last Days” trilogy, Eclipse of the Sun.

 

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liberals, Religious Liberty, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Olympian Middle | Tagged , , , , , ,
15 Comments

ASK FATHER: Can priests determine not to distribute Communion under both kinds?

From a priest (extracted from a comment)…

QUAERITUR:

Are we priests canonically allowed to limit this practice [Communion under both kinds] to 2-3 times a year of our own authority? We are not taught in the seminary that we may make this decision. I understand what Fr. Z has presented here but while in the seminary we were essentially told this is a call for the ordinary to make, not the pastor. (“…as judged first of all by the diocesan Bishop.”) It is always horrific to witness the profanation of the Blessed Sacrament but what may a priest do without finding himself thrown under the bus? Fr. Z gives wonderful advice most of the time (alright, all of the time!) but in many cases if a pastor were to follow his advice he would find himself under the disciplinary thumb of the chancery.

Yes, my road is the hard road, long, steep and thorny.

Your point drags us back into the whole clouded area of the bishop being the “chief liturgist” in the diocese. I interpret that to mean that the bishop has the authority and responsibility of making sure liturgical law – as it stands – is being observed to the fullest extent in the diocese.  Especially important is that the bishop intervene in matters of serious abuses.  Redemptionis Sacramentum is especially helpful for a bishop in this regard.

And then we come to things that are open to legitimate choices.  Options such as the orientation of the altar, choice of vestment styles, both species,  the sign of peace, which penitential rite to say, whether to have the foot washing on Holy Thursday (NOT whether to choose women – NO!), etc.) are left to the prudential judgment of the priests.

Others interpret the bishop’s role to mean that the bishop has the authority to clarify and even establish which options are best suited to the diocese. This interpretation violates the principle of subsidiarity, held so dear by so many on the other side of the debating squad. According to this interpretation, the bishop can mandate whether white wine or red wine is to be used, whether birettas are to be worn or not, whether Mass is said facing the altar or against the people, whether blue-violet is acceptable during advent, and whether roses or daisies are permitted on the reredos or, quod Deus averruncet, huge ugly red mums.

Redemptionis Sacramentum unambiguously establishes that distribution of both species is to be disallowed whenever there is a danger of the Precious Blood being profaned.

I do not see anywhere that that judgment is reserved to the diocesan bishop.  That is to say, RS doesn’t take the decision away from the priest saying the Mass.

A pastor (parish priest) can, prudently, determine that regular distribution of Holy Communion under both species is not acceptable.  He can restrict it to infrequent occasions or not have it at all.

Depending on the diocese, this pastor could wind up experiencing increased scrutiny from the chancery for having exercised his duties as a pastor in accordance with RS.

Finally, a few years ago, His Mightiness The Extraordinary Ordinary Most Rev. Robert Morlino of Bishop of Madison dealt with this issue in a way that could be a model for other places.  Take a look HERE.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
34 Comments

Cyber Security, Computer Maintenance, and YOU

In seminary we were to clean our rooms every Saturday morning.  I still am in the habit of doing cleaning chores that day.  I also do routine work on my computers: back ups, clean ups, virus scans, tidy up the registry, drivers, etc.

Maintenance is important.

Today I am doing a little more: I am changing all my passwords on all my major… things.

I read about a new threat today that I took seriously.  Also, it was time.

May I recommend that you all get a big external hard drive to back up everything that is important to you?  Critical things should be kept on a USB drive, maybe even offsite, such as a bank box.

Moreover, get uninterruptible power sources (UPS) for your important equipment.  Big TVs and that sort of thing should also have gizmos to clean up the electricity.

Some ideas.

An IronKey, a flashdrive that is rugged and can be encrypted.

Click

IronKey is more expensive, but it won’t fail you.  Keep images of important documents, files you must not lose.  We all have them.

And external drive with 1 TB.  That sounds big but it really isnt’ anymore.

Here is one that is portable.  Once you use a link you can shop around.

Click

Remember two things:

1) It is not a matter of IF your drive will fail you, it is a matter of WHEN.  It will happen.  Do you want to lose all your photos?  Music? Documents?  Records?  You will.

2) Jesus saves.  So should you.  Make backups and, if you are like me, backups of the backups.  I am not a huge fan of these “cloud services”. Who has access to my data?

When the power is interrupted, as in a storm (when the EMP hits we will have bigger problems and you need Faraday cages for that… but I digress) your equipment can be damaged, not to mention the work you can loose.

Uninterruptible power sources.  I have a bunch of them.  I think size matters.  If you are running something simple, go small.  But I think bigger is better.  They protect from larger surges, they can run more things for longer.  I like APC products because of the super customer service I have had with them.  When I was in the countryside where the power grid was susceptible to storms and surges, these things saved my bacon several times and each time APC replaced my batteries or units.  A couple other companies did nothing for me.  BAH!

Again, use the link and shop around.

Click

Like with all disasters, they always happen to someone else…. until they happen to you.

Prepare.

Semper parati!

Some of you will have your own practical hints and horror stories, as well as disasters averted tales.

UPDATE 11 April:

From xkcd:

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Semper Paratus | Tagged , , ,
12 Comments

The Feeder Feed: Strigine Edition

I have written of owls before.  I once shared a winter encounter I had with a Great Gray, seared into my mind’s eye.  I also shared photos of the old “Owl Room”, the guest room, at the legendary Sabine Farm with its exquisite lamps.  I guess that would have been the Strigine Sabine Room.

No, No! I saw them first!

And to think, that’s just one of them and only one aspect of the owliness of that room.

Striginicity?

Here is an amusing and yet informative video about owls.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Look… without my old feeders I have to be creative if I am going to keep this tag alive!

And, yes, the snooty adjective for owly is strigine.

Posted in Lighter fare, The Feeder Feed | Tagged , , , , ,
5 Comments

ASK FATHER: Spilling the Precious Blood

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

What should one do if the chalice containing the precious blood is dropped as it is passed to the communicant.

I hope that this is theoretical, only. As a seminarian I once saw this happen and people just blithely tramped around through the Precious Blood, though there were several priests present. It was winter, so there was soon a horrible mix of mud and footprints everywhere….   BRRRRR!

This can be complicated by the scourge of carpeting in churches.

The first thing to do is stop everything.   Have the servers, or someone, go to the sacristy to fetch purificators and a bowl, which can then be used carefully both to mark the area where the Precious Blood spilled and also to start soaking up what can be soaked up.  Use lots of purificators if necessary.  Father (or deacons or real acolytes) ideally does this himself.

Stopping everything for the clean up could be a teaching moment for the entire congregation.  Perhaps a super brief fervorino about adoring the Lord in the Blessed Sacrament so profaned.

A next step would be to begin cleansing the area by using water.  Cleanse and soak up.  Repeat.

Thereafter, the priest should thoroughly rinse all the purificators in water and the rinsing water should all go down either the sacrarium or be poured on the ground.  The purificators can then be laundered as usual or, if they are shot because of the process, burned.

REMINDER: The Precious Blood Itself may not be poured into the sacrarium.  That could incur an excommunication.  Make sure that plenty of water is used so that the Precious Blood be so diluted that the substance is broken.

Finally, in that place, Communion also with the Precious Blood should be ended.  Period.

The fact of the spilling of the Precious Blood demonstrates that there is danger of profanation of the Eucharist in that place.

The CDW’s 2004 instruction Redemptionis Sacramentum states – and this may not be ignored:

[101.] In order for Holy Communion under both kinds to be administered to the lay members of Christ’s faithful, due consideration should be given to the circumstances, as judged first of all by the diocesan Bishop. It is to be completely excluded where even a small danger exists of the sacred species being profaned. …

Finally, the training of the people who help with Communion must be accessed.

It is nearly impossible to imagine that a person would do this on purpose.  However, it could happen from carelessness because of lack of good training or good formation on precisely what … who… is being handled and why.

I would avoid jumping all over the person who did the spilling, for that certainly was a mistake.  That person would probably be truly mortified, so go easily.

And, apart from the training of the “ministers”, there is the problem of the care that the communicants themselves may or may not show.  Watching people receive Communion of the Host directly in the hand hasn’t filled me with great confidence that vast numbers of our faithful have truly absorbed the importance of the moment.  To permit that such carelessness be unleashed upon a vessel of the Precious Blood is … a harrowing thought.

There are a few occasions wherein it may be appropriate to have Communion under both kinds (e.g., a newly wedded couple during their nuptial Mass, 1st Communion, solemn religious profession).  In those situations the greatest care must be taken.  However, it seems to me that, since we are strong – or ought to be –  in our Catholic Faith and understanding that both the Body and Blood of the Lord are truly present in the individual Host, Communion under both kinds is not a prudent practice on anything like the scale of a congregation.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , , , , ,
43 Comments

Bp. Jugis statement on reactions to Sr. Laurel’s high school talk

We have all seen the coverage and discussions of what ensued after Sr. Jane Laurel, OP, gave a talk at a high school in the Diocese of Charlotte in North Carolina.

Most Reverend Peter J. Jugis, Bishop of Charlotte, has made a statement.

From their diocesan newspaper’s site:

[…]

Bishop Jugis’ full statement, issued April 9, follows:

Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,

The past few weeks have been very difficult for Charlotte Catholic High School. We have all experienced a great deal of pain. During this difficult time I want to express my support and encouragement for all the parents, students, staff and faculty at the high school. We must move forward toward healing with charity, the hallmark of our Christian life.

Different viewpoints regarding Sr. Jane Dominic Laurel’s presentation to students on March 21, 2014, have been discussed in a variety of venues.

At the parent meeting on April 2, 2014, many expressed concern about the lack of advanced communication with parents regarding the subject matter of the assembly. Apologies were made at the meeting for that lack of advanced communication.

The content of the Church’s moral teaching was not raised as a matter of contention at the parent meeting. All of our Catholic schools are committed to hold and teach the Catholic faith in its fullness and with integrity. The Catechism of the Catholic Church contains an explanation of our faith and is accessible to all.

During this difficult time I support the continued work of Fr. Matthew Kauth, the chaplain; Mrs. Angela Montague and Mr. Steve Carpenter, the assistant principals; and Mr. Randy Belk, the dean of students; and all they are doing for our Charlotte Catholic High School students. All of us are indebted to them.

I am shocked to hear the disturbing reports of a lack of charity and respect at the parents’ meeting, and outside the meeting in conversations and in social media. There simply is no room in the Catholic Church for such displays of uncharitableness and disrespect. If we have failed in this regard let us make amends to God and neighbor. Even when we disagree, that disagreement should be expressed respectfully in love.

We ask the Lord Jesus Christ for His mercy and His healing as we approach the celebrations of Palm Sunday, Holy Week and Easter Sunday of the Lord’s Resurrection. Please be assured of our continued dedication to the mission to teach and live the truth of the Catholic faith at our Charlotte Catholic High School.

Sincerely yours in Christ,

Most Reverend Peter J. Jugis

Bishop of Charlotte

Posted in Linking Back | Tagged , ,
Comments Off on Bp. Jugis statement on reactions to Sr. Laurel’s high school talk

ACTION ITEM! Nominate the next Archbishop!

ACTION ITEM BELOW!

Some people in my native place, the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, have in their bizzaro-world imaginations dreamed up a project to nominate the next Archbishop.

Yes, the Catholic Coalition for Church Reform, all four of them, have been busy.

To get an idea of what these folks are about, look at the links on their side bar:

  • Council of the Baptized
  • Progressive Catholic Voice
  • Catholics for Marriage Equality MN
  • American Catholic Council
  • Call to Action MN
  • Call to Action US
  • FutureChurch
  • Roman Catholic Womenpriests
  • Spirit of St. Stephen’s Catholic Community

I think you get the idea.

For some real fun, scroll down a bit and read their “Toward an Expanding Lay Spirituality for the 21st Century”.  Whew!

Excerpt (with my emphases and comment):

The conditions on this planet earth are just right for molecules of matter to combine energies to form living cells, and they combined to form organisms, which combined to form ever more complex organisms in billions of species. And then, one species of very complex organisms, walking upright, with a cranium large enough to house an expanded brain, became conscious of itself as experiencing the world. The universe became conscious of itself and saw that it was good. [Nah, that’s not weird.]

The evolutionary pattern is that new being emerges from the combined energies of already existing being; for example, hydrogen and oxygen combine and there is water. Looking back at that pattern of new creation emerging, from sub-atomic particles to atoms, then molecules, then cells, we can see that humans too have combined conscious energy to create cultural forms to produce new consciousness. They created increasingly complex or nuanced systems to live in community–governments, economic systems, educational systems—and complex systems to create meaning—religions, art, literature, music, dance. They have become co-creators of the evolving universe that now includes the culture of the species that has covered the face of the earth.

CCCR wants to explore how the above creation story can reveal Jesus’s message of God’s love for the world.

Wow.  Just… wow.  It sounds like the loony ravings that the LCWR has wallowed in for the last couple years.  HERE and HERE

Now for the ACTION ITEM!

If you want to help them nominate a priest to become the next Archbishop of St. Paul and Minneapolis… my native place, I’m just sayin’… they have an online form HERE.

I’m not saying that you should nominate anyone in particular but… well… it is my native place, after all… I’m just concerned for their welfare.

¡Vaya lío!

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, Liberals, Lighter fare, You must be joking! | Tagged ,
82 Comments