MEDJUGORJE: A miraculous healing from ALS?

I limit my writing on Medjugorje to almost nothing. However, I hadn’t seen this in the Anglophone press.

My translation from Affari Italiani:

Medjugorje, nuovo miracolo: guarisce malato di Sla
Medjugorje, new miracle: a healing from Lou Gehrig’s Disease.

Christian Felice, 37 years from Piante Crati (Cosenza), after visiting the sanctuary put in the spotlight a few weeks ago, was healed from ALS. The man recounted that he arrived with his wife and children in Bosnia to pay a visit to the Madonna and, while he was standing and looking at the sanctuary from afar, he heard a clear voice in his ear, asking him to go to the hill. With enormous effort he went and the Virgin Mary appeared for an instant before his eyes. After a great cry, Christian, moved, got up from his wheelchair and even within a few hours no longer had need for his respirator. In the next days he also got rid of his feeding tube.

[…]

That is the core of the article. Maybe you have seen it elsewhere.

Remember: miracles have to be authenticated. Before they are authenticated, they must be shown to be inexplicable by modern medicine, sudden, complete and lasting.

I will leave you with only one thought.

God grants miracles. We should ask for them.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
2 Comments

Day 7 – Florence: pici, paintings, and anti-popes

Brief notes.

Mass this morning.

20131015-153610.jpg

20131015-153814.jpg

Visits to the Medici chapel and San Lorenzo.

The Duomo and Baptistry.

20131015-153933.jpg

20131015-153950.jpg

20131015-154004.jpg

I have a Novus Ordo comment concerning the Duomo. Later.

[… It’s later now.  Here is the the above mentioned “Novus Ordo thought”.  On the one side of the painted dome is Christ triumphant.  At the opposite side of the dome is the Enemy, Satan.  Christ is at the exact right place in the painting in cupola – Brunelleschi’s Dome – so that when in the older, traditional form of Holy Mass for centuries the priest/bishop said Mass at the main altar, when He raised his eyes heavenward, he would look straight through the Host and at Christ, triumphant.  But if you turn the altar around….  I’m just making an observation, of course.]

20131015-154102.jpg

20131015-154112.jpg

20131015-154135.jpg

I live this sign.

Tomb of John XXIII… really.

20131015-154318.jpg

This is the tomb of John XXIII the anti-pope, of course.  He was the last “John” before 1958.  Of course some wags today say that, were they to be elected Pope, they would choose the name John XXIII.  That is polemical, however.

20131015-154334.jpg

Lunch.

I had fiocchetti di pera con taleggio ed asparagi.

20131015-154410.jpg

This is guinea-fowl in wine and pomegranate.

20131015-154442.jpg

Great restaurant. Some if the bill went to a children’s hospital.

I am about to visit Santa Croce.

UPDATE:

Alas there is a lot of scaffolds up around the sanctuary. Still…

Just for fun here is a sweet image, a fragment from a fresco by Giovanni di Tano Fei from 1405-10 of mary, sewing with a little helper. Just can just see the Child holding threads.

UPDATE:

In the evening we went to a place for Florentine steak.

Before and after,

Brief notes.

… and after after.

I got out my own pocket knife to clean up the bone a bit more.  And then I cleaned up a couple other bones as well.  What a gift.

Items are included for scale.

This one served 4 of us. Magnificent.

I also had a chance to speak with the director of a new Catholic sacred art school in Florence, soon to be opening a new branch in New York City. This is a cool project and I will write about it in a separate post. In the meantime, check out:

Sacred Art School – Florence.

Imagine studying art from a Catholic perspective, based on the theology of the body and works such as Joseph Ratzinger’s Spirit of the Liturgy.

Posted in On the road, What Fr. Z is up to | Tagged ,
18 Comments

Exemplary fuzzy thinking about Pope Francis

At Hell’s Bible there is an op-ed which exemplifies some of the fuzzy thinking going around about Pope Francis.   The basic idea is that Pope Francis is the very bestest and most wonderfulest ehvur.  He’s going to get rid of all the stuff we don’t like so we have have sex with any animate or inanimate thing we want, etc.   He’s sort of a Catholic president Obama.

In fact, Pope Francis is not going to change the Church’s doctrines on faith and morals.  He just won’t.  When liberals figure this out – really figure it out – they will eventually turn on him.

A couple telling paragraphs:

Lapsed, but Listening
By TIMOTHY EGAN

The Jesuits have always tried to get people to think for themselves, to arrive at belief through an arduous process. When bishops started telling parishioners that their gay and lesbian siblings were sinners, and that family planning was a grievous wrong, people stopped listening to them — for good reason.

“In terms of people in the pews, the Catholic Church lost roughly one-fourth of its strength over the last 35 years,” wrote the political scientists Robert Putnam and David Campbell in their book “American Grace.” They argue that when the religious right politicized faith, they put a “not welcome” sign on the door for millions of people of faith. This was compounded by the hypocrisy of these same moral authorities protecting pedophile priests while ignoring the lifelong anguish of the victims. For much of the 20th century, the Catholic Church in places was essentially organized crime in clerical garb.

The spirituality of Pope Francis, like his namesake from Assisi, is by example. Shedding the glam trappings of power and the aura of invincibility, he lives in a spartan guesthouse, mixes with the folks and tries to give voice to the sick, the poor, the immigrant living in the shadows. He washes the feet of prisoners, and Muslim ones at that. He laments that worshiping “the god called money” makes for bankrupt human beings.

The church he envisions would be a “home for all,” not “a nest protecting our mediocrity.” It’s strong stuff, long overdue and as refreshing as a brisk wind blowing down from the Dolomites.

His second strategy is aimed at the hardened heart of the church inside Vatican Square — the curia. He has summoned the cardinals for discussions on how to reform the church, the role of women and posture toward divorced Catholics. One goal is to remove the adjective “scandal-plagued” from curia.

No fancy cars, he admonishes the high clerics. Clean up the Vatican bank. The word “monsignor,” which means “my lord,” is out for elites. And enough with the “interminable and boring homilies where no one understands anything.” If that weren’t enough, he went after the cult of power: “Heads of church have often been narcissists, flattered and thrilled by their courtiers.”

The only problem with Francis is his age. If he were 50, he might have a quarter-century to move his church up several centuries in enlightened thinking. His time is short. But what a miraculous sprint, producing this minor miracle: the lapsed are listening.

Blech.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
34 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes

Was there a good, a good, point in the sermon you heard at Mass for your Sunday obligation?

Let us know.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
18 Comments

Day 6 – Florence: cells and seminarians

This morning early we went to San Marco, the old Dominican convent with the cells painted by Beato Angelico.

It was great to be there before the hoards arrived. We had the place to our selves.

It is always moving to turn up the stair case and see the Annunciation.

20131014-093607.jpg

I stood in front of her for about 10 minutes and came to a new conclusion.

We are now on the way to the seminary of the Institute of Christ the King where I will say Mass for the group.

20131014-161037.jpg

20131014-192350.jpg

20131014-192446.jpg

20131014-192459.jpg

20131014-192512.jpg

20131014-192523.jpg

20131014-192539.jpg

20131014-192552.jpg

20131014-192600.jpg

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
20 Comments

Pope Francis embraces USCCB’s “pastoral priorities”

A lot of people have written to me expressing their feeling that Pope Francis has “pulled the rug from under them” or even, melodramatically, “stabbed them in the back”.

These are people who are, usually, deeply involved in the pro-life movement.

Pope Francis had said, in off the cuff circumstances, that we shouldn’t be “obsessed” with matters such as abortion.

His Holiness’ comments were widely taken as a complete betrayal of the position of the USCCB in its efforts to defend life and combat the Obama Administrations evil attack on the religious liberty.

From the Catholic Herald, the UK’s best Catholic weekly:

Francis supports the US bishops’ public stands, says Cardinal Dolan
By FRANCIS X ROCCA

Pope Francis’s appeal for the Church not to focus exclusively on moral issues does not mean that the American bishops have to change their priorities in the public square, Cardinal Timothy Dolan has said.

Speaking to the American Catholic News Service, the president of the US bishops’ conference said: “What he’s saying is that if the perception of the Church is of a scold who’s always nagging and always negative and always fearful, we’re not going to make many converts, because nobody wants to join the Church out of fear or [join a] a paranoid group.

“If we emphasise the positive, the gracious, the embracing, the warm, inviting side of the Church, then we’re going to attract people,” he said. “And that, of course, is what Pope Francis is saying and doing on steroids.”

Cardinal Dolan met Pope Francis at the Vatican on Monday, along with Archbishop Joseph Kurtz of Louisville, vice president of the US bishops’ conference, Mgr Ronny Jenkins, general secretary, and Mgr J Brian Bransfield, associate general secretary.

The cardinal said the group told the Pope about some of the US bishops’ “pastoral priorities”, including support for immigration reform and objections to the Affordable Care Act, “because it excludes the baby in the womb and the undocumented worker, and also because the implementation of it would place a severe burden on our religious convictions and our consciences” by mandating coverage of contraception in violation of Catholic moral teaching.

Pope Francis “was very attentive to that and he listened very closely”, Cardinal Dolan said.

According to Cardinal Dolan, the US bishops have a “lot of issues we’re hung up on, including immigration, the budget battle, proper health care, world peace, Syria, hunger and the HHS [contraception] mandates,” he said. But the “only one that ever seems to get attention would be any kind of controversial promotion that we would do in defence of life, in defence of marriage and in defence of religious freedom, because they tend to be the more combative issues of the day.”

[…]

Posted in Francis, Religious Liberty |
51 Comments

Day 5 – Umbria: Things Benedictine and Franciscan

This morning we left Rome for Norcia, where there is a new monastic community in that place said to be the birthplace of St Benedict. The weather has really cooperated. It has poured rain but it let up just as we arrived.

I’ll post some pics and fill in some blanks later.

Okay… my photos aren’t loading. This is Italy after all.

More later about our time in Norcia and then Assisi.

Keep checking and I will revise as I can.

20131013-181429.jpg

20131013-181451.jpg

The computer that runs the monks’ podcasts of their monastic hours!

20131014-092321.jpg

20131014-092345.jpg

20131014-092408.jpg

20131014-092421.jpg

20131014-092437.jpg

I have had some trouble uploading.

We also went to Assisi.

20131014-093026.jpg

20131014-093104.jpg

20131014-093120.jpg

20131014-093141.jpg

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
15 Comments

Europe: Abortion to be a “human right”?

We lacked only this last confirmation of how wickedly obtuse people have become.

This is perverse.

From CNS:

EU May Declare Abortion a ‘Human Right’

(CNSNews.com) – European lawmakers this month will vote on a measure that promotes abortion as a fundamental human right, while taking aim at the conscientious objection rights of pro-life doctors and health workers.

Critics see the move as an attempt to dictate abortion policy to individual European Union governments, despite an acknowledgement by leading E.U. institutions that there is no consensus on the matter across the 28 member-states.

The controversial draft report, which is being promoted by socialist members of the European Parliament (MEPs), was passed last month by the legislature’s committee on women’s rights and gender equality.

According to supporting documents, 20 E.U. member-states legally permit abortion on demand, while six others have limitations which are either interpreted broadly (Britain, Finland, Cyprus) or restrictively (Ireland, Poland, Luxembourg). Malta prohibits all abortions. (The 28th and newest member, Croatia, had not joined the E.U. when the legislation was being drafted.)

Even in countries where abortion is legal, the report states, it is often made unavailable “through the abuse of conscientious objection or overly restrictive interpretations of existing limits.”  Other obstacles include “medically unnecessary waiting periods or biased counseling.”

(Some E.U. countries have compulsory waiting period of up to seven days and pre-abortion counseling, either for all women or in some cases for adolescents only.)

The measure would therefore require member states to “regulate and monitor the use of conscientious objection so as to ensure that reproductive health care is guaranteed as an individual’s right, while access to lawful services is ensured and appropriate and affordable referrals systems are in place.”

An explanatory note complains that objectors deny women information about and access to “lawful interruption of pregnancy.”

[…]

Can you read the signs of the times?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
24 Comments

How many people are going to Hell… and why?

Here is an interesting video from Michael Voris.

I suggest listening to the end.

This concerns whether many or few or none go to Hell.

I, and others, addressed this not long ago and a kerfuffle arose.  HERE

I wrote:

The greatest accomplishment of the Enemy of our souls is to deceive people that the Enemy doesn’t exist … that there is no Hell … that people can’t go to Hell … that no one is in Hell, blah blah blah.

Let’s be clear about this.  Catholics are obliged to believe in the existence of the Devil and of Hell.  These are de fide doctrines taught by the Church without the possibility of error.

The Devil exists.  Fallen angels hate you with a malice no human can imagine.  They have an intellect that surpasses our mere human faculties in a way that we can’t fathom.   They never tire.  They are relentless.  They are real.  If you don’t believe in the existence of malicious fallen angels, you are in serious risk of joining them in Hell.  This is no joke.

[…]

Some good grist for discussion here.

Posted in Four Last Things | Tagged , , ,
94 Comments

A German Diocese gets wacky: Ed Peters comments

Ed Peters has an important post at his place.

A German bishop essentially declared himself the Church’s lawgiver (read: Pope) and dispensed with the universal law.

From In The Light Of The Law:

This is why we have Canon 428

October 10, 2013

The Archdiocese of Freiburg in Germany became canonically “vacant” on 17 Sep 2013 when the resignation of its archbishop, Robert Zollitsch, was accepted promptly upon his reaching age 75 (1983 CIC 401 § 1). Now, Canon 428 § 1, a law with roots back at least to the 12th century, states When a see is vacant, nothing is to be altered.” The Archdiocese of Freiburg is not exempt from this law.

The prohibition against divorced but civilly remarried Catholics taking Communion is regarded as an application of Canon 915 and reflects a Eucharistic discipline going back many, many centuries. From a cornucopia of sources, a quote from the International Theological Commission 1977 statement on Christian marriage sums up this discipline:

In English:

“The incompatibility of the state of remarried divorced persons with the precept and mystery of the Paschal love of the Lord makes it impossible for these people to receive, in the Eucharist, the sign of unity with Christ. Access to eucharistic Communion can only be had through penitence, which implies detestation of the sin committed and the firm purpose of not sinning again.

While this illegitimate situation does not permit a life of full communion with the Church, still Christians who find themselves in this state are not excluded from the action of divine grace and from a link with the Church. They must not, therefore, be deprived of pastoral assistance.”

[…]

When, therefore, someone in some office of the archdiocese (reports I’ve seen don’t clearly say which), issued a ‘policy’ whereby divorced but civilly remarried Catholics could, basically upon meeting with a priest, be permitted to take holy Communion, something pretty big was “altered”.

If this novel ‘policy’ of the Archdiocese of Freiburg is not an (attempted) “alteration” of ecclesiastical discipline, what would be? If it is not, therefore, prohibited by operation of, if nothing else, Canon 428, what is?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes | Tagged , , , ,
15 Comments