FLASH! Obi-Wan Kenobi Is Dead, Vader Says

In the “Outer Rim Territories” section of the Galactic Empire Times, we find this article.  My emphases and comments.

Be sure to go to the GET and spike their stats.

Obi-Wan Kenobi Is Dead, Vader Says

By DEN DHUR and HALLIS SAPER
Published: May 9, 2011

CORUSCANT — Obi-Wan Kenobi, the mastermind of some of the most devastating attacks on the Galactic Empire and the most hunted man in the galaxy, was killed in a firefight with Imperial forces near Alderaan, Darth Vader announced on Sunday.  [I am sure that there was dancing in the halls of the Death Star.]

In a late-night appearance in the East Room of the Imperial Palace, Lord Vader declared that “justice has been done” as he disclosed that agents of the Imperial Army and stormtroopers of the 501st Legion had finally cornered Kenobi, one of the leaders of the Jedi rebellion, who had eluded the Empire for nearly two decades. Imperial officials said Kenobi resisted and was cut down by Lord Vader’s own lightsaber. He was later dumped out of an airlock.

The news touched off an extraordinary outpouring of emotion as crowds gathered in the Senate District and outside the Imperial Palace, waving imperial flags, cheering, shouting, laughing and chanting, “Hail to the Emperor! Hail Lord Vader!” In the alien protection zone, crowds sang “The Ten Thousand Year Empire.” Throughout the Sah’c district, airspeeder drivers honked horns deep into the night.

“For over two decades, Kenobi has been the Jedi rebellion’s leader and symbol,” the Lord of the Sith said in a statement broadcast across the galaxy via HoloNet. “The death of Kenobi marks the most significant achievement to date in our empire’s effort to defeat the rebel alliance. But his death does not mark the end of our effort. There’s no doubt that the rebellion will continue to pursue attacks against us. We must and we will remain vigilant at home and abroad.”

Obi-Wan Kenobi ’s demise is a defining moment in the stormtrooper-led fight against terrorism, a symbolic stroke affirming the relentlessness of the pursuit of those who turned against the Empire at the end of the Clone Wars. What remains to be seen, however, is whether it galvanizes Kenobi’s followers by turning him into a martyr or serves as a turning of the page in the war against the Rebel Alliance and gives further impetus to Emperor Palpatine to step up Stormtrooper recruitment.

In an earlier statement issued to the press, Kenobi boasted that striking him down could make him “more powerful than you could possibly imagine.” [Yah.. right.]

How much his death will affect the rebel alliance itself remains unclear. For years, as they failed to find him, Imperial leaders have said that he was more symbolically important than operationally significant because he was on the run and hindered in any meaningful leadership role. Yet he remained the most potent face of terrorism in the Empire, and some of those who played down his role in recent years nonetheless celebrated his death.

Given Kenobi’s status among radicals, the Imperial Galactic government braced for possible retaliation. A Grand Moff of the Imperial Starfleet said late Sunday that military bases in the core worlds and around the galaxy were ordered to a higher state of readiness. The Imperial Security Bureau issued a galactic travel warning, urging citizens in volatile areas “to limit their travel outside of their local star systems and avoid mass gatherings and demonstrations.”

The strike could deepen tensions within the Outer Rim, which has periodically bristled at Imperial counterterrorism efforts even as Kenobi evidently found safe refuge it its territories for nearly two decades. Since taking over as Supreme Commander of the Imperial Navy, Lord Vader has ordered significantly more strikes on suspected terrorist targets in the Outer Rim, stirring public anger there and leading to increased criminal activity.

When the end came for Kenobi, [NB…] he was found not in the remote uncharted areas of Wild Space and the Unknown Regions, where he has long been presumed to be sheltered, but in a massive compound about an hour’s drive west from the Tatooine capital of Bestine. He had been living under the alias “Ben” Kenobi for some time.  [Sneak.]

The compound, only about 50 miles from the base of operations for the Imperial Storm Squadron, is at the end of a narrow dirt road and is roughly eight times larger than other homes in the area, which were largely occupied by Tusken Raiders. When Imperial operatives converged on the planet on Saturday, following up on recent intelligence, two local moisture farmers “resisted the assault force” and were killed in the middle of an intense gun battle, a senior Stormtrooper said, but details were still sketchy early Monday morning. [I wonder if there were any mechanical problems.]

A representative of the Imperial Starfleet said that military and intelligence officials first learned last summer that a “high-value target” was hiding somewhere on the desert world and began working on a plan for going in to get him. Beginning in March, Lord Vader worked closely with a series of several different Admirals serving onboard the Death Star to go over plans for the operation, and on Friday morning gave the final order for members of the 501st Legion (known commonly as “Vader’s Fist”) to strike.

Kenobi and a group of his followers were eventually captured while fleeing the system, and taken aboard the Death Star, which was in the midst of surveying the recent environmental disaster on Alderaan. Darth Vader called it a “targeted operation,” although officials said four tie fighters were lost because of “mechanical failures” and had to be destroyed to keep them from falling into hostile hands.

In addition to Kenobi, two men and one wookiee were killed, one believed to be his young apprentice and the other two his couriers, according to an admiral who briefed reporters under Imperial ground rules forbidding further identification. A woman was killed when she was used as a shield by a male combatant, the Admiral said. Two droids were also reported missing.

“No Stormtroopers were seriously harmed,” Lord Vader said. “They took care to avoid civilian casualties. After a firefight, I defeated my former master and took custody of his body.” Jedi tradition requires burial within 24 hours, but by doing it in deep space, Imperial authorities presumably were trying to avoid creating a shrine for his followers.

Lord Vader has denied requests to present photographs of the body, describing them as “too gruesome” for the general public.

Some of you might be skeptical about the reporting, and even about the tone of the report.  You may suspect that the news is being skewed by some ideology.

I find your lack of faith disturbing.

Posted in Lighter fare, The Drill | Tagged , ,
22 Comments

Chicago: The Pfleger Follies continue!

Giving an ultimatum in public to a Cardinal Archbishop when you are a priest of the diocese entrusted to that that Cardinal Archbishop, would, I believe, be considered by most priests to be at the level of daft.  One might even consider the ultimating priest to be a crackit gaberlunzie.

Cardinals are generally viewed as weak friends but powerful enemies.

This is from the Chicago Tribune with my emphases and comments:

Pfleger says he will begin to preach at other churches if his suspension isn’t ended

Outspoken priest sets this weekend as deadline

The Rev. Michael Pfleger said Tuesday in a meeting with parishioners that if he is not reinstated as pastor of St. Sabina Catholic Church by this weekend, he will begin to preach at other churches. [Other Catholic churches?  I doubt it.  Remember that Fr. Pfleger had his faculties removed, which I assume includes his faculty to preach.  A pastor of a Catholic parish who let him preach under these circumstances would not incur the favor of the local ordinary.] In his first in-depth public remarks about his suspension by Cardinal Francis George, Pfleger told a group of about 150 people that he has received numerous offers to preach from churches throughout the city and the country and needs to get back to preaching.

He did not specify at what churches he might speak or their denominations.  [And if he goes to preach at a non-Catholic church, he will be demonstrating that what Card. George concluded was correct: Fr. Pfleger had already left the Catholic Church if he could talk the way he had been talking.]

Still, Pfleger insisted that the only way he will leave St. Sabina is if he is thrown out or if he believes God wants him to go.

“This has been very painful,” Pfleger said, choking back tears. [I sincerely believe that it has been.]

George is in the process of planning a meeting with Pfleger but has not set a time yet, said Colleen Dolan, communications director for the Chicago Archdiocese.

On April 27, George sent a letter to Pfleger suspending him from his duties and saying the priest’s recent remarks in the news media that he would leave the Catholic Church if he were removed from St. Sabina had “short-circuited” efforts that have been under way for weeks to reach an agreement on his transition to a new post.

The cardinal named the Rev. Thulani Magwaza, the associate pastor at St. Sabina, as administrator during the suspension and the Rev. Andrew Smith, a priest at St. Ailbe’s Parish, as his assistant.

Throughout his tenure, Pfleger’s political activism and outspokenness have often placed him at odds with cardinals, even before George. But the cardinal’s suggestion in March to name Pfleger president of Leo Catholic High School quickly escalated into a standoff that pitted his African-American congregation and other South Side supporters against the archdiocese.

On Tuesday, Pfleger told the parishioners that although he was still their pastor, [Perhaps in an informal sense.] he said it was too painful for him to continue attending services.

Pfleger spent about 90 minutes talking to the group and answering questions about his suspension and the future of the church.

He insisted that George never ordered him to become president of nearby Leo High School. Pfleger also said he did not disobey the cardinal by saying he was not qualified for such an assignment.

Pfleger added that the media received the letter from George suspending him before he did and that he never threatened to leave the Catholic Church if he were removed.

In fact, Pfleger told radio show hosts Tavis Smiley and Cornel West in April that he would look outside the Catholic Church if offered no other choice but to work at the Catholic high school.

While he has consulted with lawyers who told him that George had no legal right to suspend him, he had no intention of suing the Catholic Church, Pfleger said.  [What a guy.]

But Pfleger said one of his lawyers would send a letter to George saying he violated canonical law by suspending him.  [Fr. Pfleger can always appeal to the Congregation for Clergy in Rome.]

Dolan said all of the protections of being a sitting pastor are over for Pfleger because his term at St. Sabina has expired.

Dolan said that while she doesn’t know if George and Pfleger have exchanged letters, they have not had a conversation since the suspension.

Tribune reporter Manya A. Brachear contributed.

cdrhodes@tribune.com

What a sad situation.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Crackit Gaberlunzie, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
21 Comments

Chillin’ the Veuve

Save The Liturgy Save The WorldFriday, 13 May… Our Lady of Fatima and Universae Ecclesiae.

Chill the Widow.

20110511-084354.jpg

In the meantime… have some Mystic Monk Coffee…. or Tea! Their shipping is pretty fast.

In the meantime… remember this from the great Vincenzo?

07/07/07

Posted in Just Too Cool, Lighter fare, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, Universae Ecclesiae | Tagged , ,
27 Comments

Fight over new Catholic chaplain of the U.S. Senate

Ten years ago there was a conflict over the appointment of a Catholic priest as chaplain for the U.S. House of Representatives. Recently, a Catholic priest, a Jesuit was appointed as chaplain for the U.S. Senate.

Former speaker pro-abortion Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) opposes the appointment.

A reader sent me to the following from Roll Call:

Pelosi, Boehner Clash Over Chaplain

Courtesy Oregon Province of the Society of Jesus

The Rev. Patrick Conroy worked for a Jesuit group ordered to pay $166 million over child sexual abuse claims, though he was not personally accused of misconduct.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is reconsidering her support for a Catholic priest nominated as House chaplain after learning that he works for a Jesuit group ordered to pay $166 million for more than 400 claims of child sexual abuse.

A spokesman for the California Democrat told Roll Call on Tuesday night that Speaker John Boehner’s office did not tell Pelosi about the March settlement — the largest ever by a single religious order to victims of sexual abuse — by the Rev. Patrick Conroy’s current employer, the Oregon Province of the Society of Jesus.

“We are most sympathetic to the concerns of the families [of victims] and take their views very seriously,” spokesman Drew Hammill said in an email. “Mr. Boehner has now provided us with additional, new information. As with the information he provided earlier along with his recommendation, we will now review these new materials.”

Boehner spokesman Michael Steel, however, said Pelosi’s office could have figured out the news on its own.

“The settlement is public knowledge, reported in The New York Times, among other media outlets,” he said in an email. “It was not a part of the discussion because it has absolutely nothing to do with Fr. Conroy. It is only being discussed now because Roll Call is asking about it.”

That’s a much different tone from last week, when Boehner’s office announced Conroy’s nomination, noting that it had the full support of both party leaders. The full House is expected to vote on the nomination later this month.

Plaintiff’s attorneys involved in the massive lawsuit said Conroy has not been accused of abusing any children or even covering up for other priests. In fact, Conroy blew the whistle on at least one case of abuse at a prior job.

Still, at least one victim and others involved in the case questioned whether the nomination to House chaplain was an appropriate honor for a member of the order.

Boehner’s office said he is sticking by his choice and noted Conroy was vetted by the Capitol Police, the House counsel and the Chief Administrative Officer.

“Both Speaker Boehner and Democratic Leader Pelosi reviewed Fr. Conroy’s background before the Speaker selected him,” Steel said. “Fr. Conroy was honest and candid, and the Speaker is confident he will be a great chaplain for the entire House of Representatives community.”

Conroy, who was ordained in 1983, would be only the second Catholic priest and the first Jesuit to hold the post of House chaplain. There were reportedly five candidates for the position, though it is unknown from what denominations or who exactly was up for the job.

Boehner and Pelosi are Catholic. In addition, Boehner is a graduate of Xavier University, a Jesuit school in Cincinnati and Pelosi, through her husband and son, has ties to Georgetown University, a Jesuit institution where Conroy worked as recently as 2003.

In announcing the nomination, Boehner’s office sent out a press release noting much of Conroy’s past work and educational experience, including his most recent work at Jesuit High School in Portland. The release did not mention his concurrent role as formation assistant for the Oregon Province of the Society of Jesus from 2006 to 2010, helping priests-to-be work toward ordination.

That group’s March settlement covers decades of abuse by several priests, mostly on Native American reservations in Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon and Washington.

More than 100 victims are from the Colville Indian Reservation in Northeastern Washington, where Conroy worked from 1984 to 1989 as a pastor. The bulk of the abuse happened before the 1980s, and three law firms representing separate groups of plaintiffs in the case independently confirmed that Conroy is not listed as a party accused of sexual abuse of children.

But Elsie Boudreau, a victim of sexual assault by an Oregon Province Jesuit in Alaska starting in 1978, said the fact that the Speaker chose someone from the group is insensitive to her and the other Native American children who were abused.

“It’s not only insensitive, it’s appalling,” she said. “The abuse was so pervasive and the damage that has been done is irreparable. For Boehner to choose someone from the Oregon Province I think says a lot to the fact that, ‘Oh well, they continued to operate this way but it’s OK.’”

Patrick Wall, a former priest who now consults lawyers on clergy sexual abuse, said choosing a member of the group honors the Oregon Province.

He said Boehner and Pelosi should not be aligning themselves with a group that “has filed not only financial bankruptcy, but basically filed moral bankruptcy.”

“I don’t think he should be given a position as a chaplain to any government entity because his province alone had over 400 alleged survivors of their priests,” Wall said.

Margaret Smith, part of the John Jay College of Criminal Justice research team that carried out the most comprehensive study to date on the prevalence of sexual abuse among Catholic priests, said the incidence of abuse is overblown.

“Those who have been terrifically and personally affected by these things think their personal influence should affect what happens on a national basis,” she said. “The bottom line is, there is a lot of this behavior in this society. Everyone is a few degrees of separation from someone who has acted inappropriately from an adolescent, unfortunately.”

Conroy did not respond to two emailed requests for comment.

The Very Rev. Patrick Lee, superior of the Oregon Province of the Society of Jesus, said in a statement that he is “deeply disappointed” by the reaction to Conroy’s nomination.

“Fr. Conroy is an excellent priest worthy of the nomination made by Speaker Boehner,” Lee said. “He has never been the subject of an allegation of child abuse.”

The Rev. Patrick Howell, a member of the Oregon Province and rector of the Jesuit community at Seattle University, where Conroy worked for four years in the 1990s, said that most incidents of abuse happened decades ago and that the perpetrators are “under supervision and very restricted.”

“Safeguards were put in to protect children. We all go through a training each year, both for the archdiocese and Jesuit order,” he said. “If anything, we’re probably better qualified to reach out to people in need and to understand the different trials and crises that people go through.”

Those safeguards were not yet in place in 1986, when Conroy, three years out of college, informed a superior about a Roman Catholic priest whom he suspected of abusing a boy.

The Seattle Times reported in 2002 that Conroy wrote a letter in 1986 to then-Seattle Archbishop Raymond Hunthausen stating that a boy told him that he had been abused by a priest when he was 12 or 13 at a parish in Snohomish, Wash.

“It seems this young man, who is about 20 years old now, was one of many young boys, years ago, who spent a lot of time with Fr. Dennis Champagne in the rectory and on outings,” Conroy wrote in 1986, according to the Times. “It came to pass on one such occasion that Fr. Champagne made a homosexual pass at the young boy in question, momentarily molesting him. The youth fled immediately. Fr. Champagne never again made such a pass, and the young man never told anyone, with the exception of a friend, who asked me to talk to the victim, about this incident.”

Conroy told the Times in 2002 that the archdiocese never responded to him and that he did not follow up on the complaint. The archdiocese told the newspaper at the time that the boy did not want to go public with his complaint.

Champagne remained in active ministry until 2002, when he resigned after the victim came forward publicly.

Roll Call reported in 2008 that former House Chaplain Daniel Coughlin managed priests who had been accused of sexual abuse for the Chicago Archdiocese before coming to the House in 2000.

Posted in Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , ,
22 Comments

HELP! Fr. Z needs some sports equivalents

Cricket and Baseball batsI am comparing the forthcoming Instruction Universae Ecclesiae to a baseball no-hitter, rather than a perfect game.

What would be the equivalents for perfect game and no-hitter in other sports?

I am especially interested in analogous accomplishments in cricket and in soccer/football or perhaps rugby.

For cricket: BOWLING, not batting.  Perfect game and no-hitter are the accomplishments of the defense.

Help!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, I'm just askin'..., Lighter fare, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill, Universae Ecclesiae | Tagged , , , , , ,
67 Comments

Universae Ecclesiae… Instruction on Summorum Pontificum.

The cat is out of the bag.

The Instruction is called Universae Ecclesiae and it will indeed be published very soon.  There is an embargo on the text until 12 noon Rome time 13 May, at which time I will offer some analysis of the document.  There will be a press conference on 13 May and it will be in the afternoon edition of L’Osservatore Romano, which is now on line, of course.

The text seems to be out and around.  Three people have offered it to me.  I have it.  I will honor the embargo, unless someone else breaks it.

Fishwrap is going to hate this.

It is not a perfect game for our side, but it is a no hitter.

Posted in Universae Ecclesiae | Tagged ,
110 Comments

Ex ore infantium: ugly edition

From priest:

Really enjoyed that bit of precocious 5 year old humor you gave us! Thought you might like another.

This happened many years ago back in my former Diocese when it was suffering under the iron handed rule of one of the most liberal (and heretical) bishops in the US. This occurred in a parish where I spent my Deacon internship year 37 years ago.

They had just finished building a new Church according to the spirit of the modern age. Outside it appeared to be a high school gym and inside it looked like a high school auditorium. They had just proudly hung a profoundly ugly risen Christ on the wall above the altar.

The pastor was so proud.

At Sunday Mass, at one of those quiet moments that occasionally occur when you could hear a pin drop, the 5 year old brother of a priest friend of mine piped up in a high clear voice, “Mommy, look at that ugly looking Jesus!”

That bit of embarrassingly innocent truth brought about the eventual demise of the ‘ugly Jesus’ better than any amount of adult protest!

The devil can’t stand to be laughed at!

Posted in Lighter fare, Mail from priests | Tagged
8 Comments

Conjunction Junction: planetary edition

MORNING PLANETS:  Set your alarm for dawn on Wednesday morning May 11th.  Jupiter and Venus will be in conjunction, shining through the eastern twilight only half a degree apart.  It’s a spectacular way to begin the day.  Visit http://spaceweather.com for photos and more information.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged , , , ,
5 Comments

FLASH: Fr. Z agrees with Bp. Morris and NCR… yes and no.

Bp. MorrisI may be in close agreement with Bp. Morris and NCR on a matter of great importance.

From the National catholic Fishwrap comes another defense of lately-removed Australian Bishop William Morris, quondam of the Diocese of Toowoomba. His Excellency is the pleasant looking fellow in the tie (right).

My emphases and comments.

Forced retirement is message to all bishops, Morris says

If he can find a copy of the Vatican report, he will make it public, he said  

May. 10, 2011
By Tom Roberts

Australian Bishop William Morris, who was forced to retire in part because of a pastoral letter he issued mentioning the possibility of ordaining women as one of several solutions to the growing priest shortage, said he would like to make public a copy of a written report on his diocese.

Morris, in answer to questions from NCR, also said he thinks his forced retirement is intended to “send a message to the bishops of the world: the fact that if you ask questions, if you’re in people’s faces long enough, if you’re kind of a nuisance around the place, well look what happened to Bill Morris.”  [I believe they may be right about this!  Bp. Morris was the third bishop removed by the Holy See this year.  Surely a message is being sent.  If you bishops bishop in this way, you will be removed from governance of the diocese hitherto entrusted to you.  The problem is, Bp. Morris and Fishwrap think that it is laudable to be a nuisance in the way he was a nuisance.  But wait.. there’s more!]

Morris made the comments on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation show “Sunday Nights with John Cleary” May 8. [Like Fr. Pfleger of Chicago, another Fishwrap Favorite, Bp. Morris took it to the mainstream media.] This writer was a participant in the discussion with Cleary, Morris and church historian Paul Collins, and asked Morris if he would make the report public if he had a copy of it and whether he thought he was meant to be an example to others.

[…]

Of the report, done by Denver Archbishop Charles Chaput, Morris said: “Yes, I would like it published because I think my people deserve the right to – you know, if Archbishop Chaput, who wandered around the diocese for three-and-a-half days … and then made a judgment on the diocese, I think the people have a right to see what judgments he made in his report.” [Think about this.  Chaput is a pretty smart guy.  Perhaps things were so bad in Toowoomba that he didn’t need more than three days.  After that… iam fetet quadriduanus enim est.]

Morris said he knows a written report exists because Chaput sent him an e-mail “telling me that he’d sent an electronic copy as well as a hard copy to the dicastery for bishops, and then he did what he was supposed to do. He destroyed both the electronic copy and the hard copy, so he didn’t have a copy any more.”  To date, Morris has not seen what was written about him or the diocese, and the Vatican apparently does not intend to reveal the contents of the report. [After a five year process, it is like that the bishop doesn’t know why he was removed from governance?  Do you think some of the issues might have come up during a, say, ad limina visit? Correspondence with dicasteries?]

Chaput, asked by NCR earlier about the report and whether it would be made public would only respond that “any apostolic visitation is governed by strict confidentiality. This is for the benefit of all parties involved.”

In answer to a question from Cleary, Morris read from the letter Pope Benedict sent to him. He said the pope appeared to be raising the stakes on discussion of ordaining women with the claim in the letter that Pope John Paul II “has decided, infallibly and irrevocably, that the church has not the right to ordain women to the priesthood.” [Raising the stakes now?  They were already raised at the time of Ordinatio sacerdotalis and then-Card. Ratzinger’s commentary as Prefect of CDF.]

“I’d say it’s part of what a lot of people are calling creeping infallibility. … Now in my knowledge, I had never seen that written before, using the word infallible concerning JPII’s statement, [?!?  He didn’t know of the CDF’s statement about Ordinatio sacerdotalis… ?!?  For that reason alone one could argue he should be removed.  A bishop doesn’t have to know the latest blurb from Cor Unum, but he really ought to know something about what the Holy See has issued about women’s ordination, so that he can teach correctly about the issue.  This is culpable ignorance, then?  That isn’t grounds for removal, of course. I was exaggerating.  But… for pity’s sake!] because he [JPII] never used the word infallible,” Morris said. “If my memory serves me, without looking at the document. I think he said the he didn’t see himself [?!?] having any power or the right to ordain women, something like that language. [What the heck is this?  Nonchalance?] But he [John Paul II] never used the word infallible.”  [Note how he recast the question.  He said that John Paul said that he himself, John Paul, didn’t think he had the authority to ordain women.  John Paul said that THE CHURCH doesn’t have authority to ordain women.  And he made that teaching definitively, at a level that all are bound to accept. The CDF said that the Church teaches this infallibly, not that John Paul in OS taught that infallibly, as if for the first time.  John Paul was definitively stating something that the Church holds infallibly.]
[Tom Roberts is NCR editor at large. His e-mail address is troberts@ncronline.org.]

John Paul II wrote:

4. Although the teaching that priestly ordination is to be reserved to men alone has been preserved by the constant and universal Tradition of the Church and firmly taught by the Magisterium in its more recent documents, at the present time in some places it is nonetheless considered still open to debate, or the Church’s judgment that women are not to be admitted to ordination is considered to have a merely disciplinary force.

Wherefore, in order that all doubt may be removed regarding a matter of great importance, a matter which pertains to the Church’s divine constitution itself, in virtue of my ministry of confirming the brethren (cf. Lk 22:32) I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful.

Really fuzzy… right?

The CDF put out a response to a dubium, in which we read:

RESPONSUM AD PROPOSITUM DUBIUM
CONCERNING THE TEACHING
CONTAINED IN “ORDINATIO SACERDOTALIS”

Dubium: Whether the teaching that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women, which is presented in the Apostolic Letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis to be held definitively, is to be understood as belonging to the deposit of faith.

Responsum: Affirmative.

This teaching requires definitive assent, since, founded on the written Word of God, and from the beginning constantly preserved and applied in the Tradition of the Church, it has been set forth infallibly [infallibly] by the ordinary and universal Magisterium (cf. Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution on the Church Lumen Gentium 25, 2). Thus, in the present circumstances, the Roman Pontiff, exercising his proper office of confirming the brethren (cf. Lk 22:32), has handed on this same teaching by a formal declaration, explicitly stating what is to be held always, everywhere, and by all, as belonging to the deposit of the faith.

The Sovereign Pontiff John Paul II, at the Audience granted to the undersigned Cardinal Prefect, approved this Reply, adopted in the Ordinary Session of this Congregation, and ordered it to be published.

Rome, from the offices of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, on the Feast of the Apostles SS. Simon and Jude, October 28, 1995. [A nice birthday present that year.]

Joseph Card. Ratzinger
Prefect

Tarcisio Bertone, S.D.B.
Archbishop Emeritus of Vercelli
Secretary

Anything about that hard to understand?

Let the protest continue.

And immediately after you send your DONATION OF PROTEST, visit the blog of the newspaper of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph, The Catholic Key which drilled into Bp. Morris’s efforts to promote vocations in the Diocese of Toowoomba.

Highlight:

Where is your life going? Are you feeling unsettled, bored, disappointed with your life so far?

Maybe the Catholic Priesthood is for you!
Inspiring!
Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , , , ,
39 Comments

Brick by brick: Italian, papal version

“Mattone su mattone.”

I found this phrase, thanks to an alert reader, in a post about the recent papal Mass during the Holy Father’s trip to Venice.   You know, the trip with the issue about the Murano glass vessels.  Check out Cantuale Antonianum.

First, there are photos of the temporary altar built for the papal Mass.  They did their best to make a basilica reflecting the Venetian Catholic thing, outside.

A glimpse in the photo at the top right of this entry.

At the Italian blog, I found this:

Let us continue in this way: brick by brick (mattone su mattone), also mega-celebrations must be on the right path.

Mattone su mattone col Santo Padre.

Brick by Brick with Pope Benedict

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , , , , ,
6 Comments