The fruits of the pro-abortion culture of death: horror in Philadelphia

The young Papist alerted me to this, and the always informative Jill Stanek has a lot more, about a developing story in Philadelphia.

The details are ghastly.

Two notes as you read more, if you chose.

On to the story in Philadelphia.

Here are a couple of Jill’s updates:

UPDATE, 10:20a: More from the Associated Press…A Philadelphia abortion doctor has been charged with eight counts of murder in the deaths of a woman patient and seven babies that prosecutors say were born alive and then killed with scissors…

District Attorney Seth Williams says state regulators ignored complaints and failed to visit the clinic since 1993.

Williams says the women were subjected to squalid and barbaric conditions at Gosnell’s Women’s Medical Society, which was shut down last year.

Gosnell has been named in at least 10 malpractice suits, including one over the death of a woman who died of sepsis and a perforated uterus.

UPDATE, 10:45a: More from the Toronto Star

Dr. Kermit Gosnell, 69, made millions of dollars over 30 years, performing as many illegal, late-term abortions as he could, prosecutors said….

Gosnell “induced labor, forced the live birth of viable babies in the sixth, seventh, eighth month of pregnancy and then killed those babies by cutting into the back of the neck with scissors and severing their spinal cord,” Williams said.

[…]

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, The Drill | Tagged , , ,
43 Comments

Bp. Finn on the defense of human life

On the The Catholic Key, blog of the newspaper of the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph comes this, which will also be in print.

The great Bp. Robert Finn… with my emphases.

March for Life: Culmination of Many Efforts to Support and Protect Human Life

By Most Rev. Robert W. Finn
Bishop of Kansas City-St. Joseph

Throughout the past year the realities of the world around us have caused us to look long and hard at a many issues that endanger the well being of God’s people. In these columns I have shared with you the principles that help to insure the respect for human life and the dignity of the human person.

Here we have reflected on health care, capital punishment, the legitimate human needs of migrants, and the proliferation of nuclear weapons. All of these issues and many more have a “common denominator”: the life and dignity of the human person, given to us irrevocably by God. Man-made law does not, of itself, establish right and wrong. God grants His graces, including the inestimable gift of human life. Law must work to safeguard and protect this life, and to establish norms for the good order of society. If law does not honor the primacy of human life, we as citizens must work to change and improve these structures in a manner that secures man’s most basic protections.

January 22, 2011, marks a particularly destructive moment in our nation’s history: the 38th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decisions: Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, which legalized abortion in almost any circumstance and at any moment in a pregnancy. Almost 60 million surgical abortions have been recorded in the United States since then – the most horrendous taking of human life in history. The numbers of abortions worldwide are certainly greater as other nations have “followed our lead.”

Washington D.C. will again be the site of the “March for Life” which commemorates this sad anniversary. Because of some other important commitments this weekend in our Diocese, this is the first time in quite a few years that I will not be able to go to the March. I am very gratified that four buses of faithful from our diocese will make the trip this year. Bill Francis, Director of our Diocesan Respect Life Office, with the help of our parish coordinators, has organized a pilgrimage which is devotional and educational for the participants. The age-range of those traveling is between 8 and 80 years. I have made the trip more times than I can recall, and the bus ride is long and cramped; the D.C. weather is often snowy. But the crowds in the hundreds of thousands are inspiring. We mustn’t stop working peacefully, prayerfully, and within the legal structures of law to end abortion in our country. It is too monumental a disgrace to neglect or forget.

Critics will sometimes suggest that “Pro-Lifers” only care for people before they are born. The record shows that this is not true. Our own Catholic agencies – and so many of our parishes – care for people at every moment, “from the womb to the tomb.” There is, in fact, no other private institution that does as much to aid people in need than the Catholic Church; Period. As Catholics we also support with our taxes the many governmental interventions that assist people. No one has more soup kitchens and food banks; no private organization provides more counseling, or has more senior housing, or has more adoption centers; None. We train people for worthy employment; we aid released prisoners in getting a new start; we serve the urban core and the furthest rural communities. We look to the legal, physical and spiritual needs of migrants. In our Catholic hospitals we have never stopped caring for the sick and the dying. In our schools we form young people, in faith, for service and authentic leadership. And yes, we are among the most persistent champions of human life from its first moment until natural death.

I know you will join me in prayerfully supporting those who March in Washington this Monday, and all who speak and act, peacefully and prayerfully, in defense of the unborn. No elected official or appointed judge is worthy of our support, if among their many acts of just advocacy they will not support the most vulnerable of our human race.

We commend our efforts to our two most powerful patrons: Mary, Mother of Life and St. Joseph, Protector of the Family. Holy Mary our Hope; St. Joseph: Pray for us!

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras | Tagged
14 Comments

The Instruction concerning Summorum Pontificum

Do you remember that there was supposed to be an Instruction concerning Summorum Pontificum?

So … where is it?

I have been of two minds about this instruction for a long time.   On the one hand, perhaps the less said, the better.  On the other hand, given that (as I interpret this pontificate) a renewal of liturgy plays a key role in the Holy Father’s “Marshall Plan” to revitalize Catholic identity, and given the fact of the ongoing talks with the SSPX, it is highly unlikely that Benedict XVI will allow the promulgation of a document which undermines his objectives of renewal and unity.

Keep in mind that Pope Benedict had asked for feedback about the implementation of Summorum Pontificum after three years.  Three years went by.  There has been sufficient time for feedback.  It’s time for the instruction.

It is my understanding that the Instruction is on its way, that it has been, if I am right, approved by His Holiness, and will be issued in the first days of March.  That implies a signature date of 22 February, the Feast of the Chair of St. Peter.  Documents are often signed on a significant date, but released later.

My guess is that this Instruction is going to have juridical elements, to make clearer what was a bit foggy in Summorum Pontificum.     What sort of juridical issues might be clarified?  What “Extraordinary” means for one thing.  The use vernacular readings instead of Latin, whether or not SP applies to other Latin Rites such as the Braga or Ambrosian in addition to the Roman Rite, what constitutes a “stable group”, how the present Code of Law and other decrees and liturgical laws affect older practices (i.e., suppression of minor orders, Communion in the hand, “straw” subdeacons, congregational singing, calendar coordination, etc.) whether there can be an mixture or cross-over of elements of the Ordinary Form and Extraordinary Form.  Those are guesses.

It is probable that this Instruction will not be the last, when it comes to the subject matter of Summorum Pontificum.

This will surely signal that Benedict XVI has not forgotten Summorum Pontificum and that he considers it to be an important document.

A change in our liturgical worship is the sine qua non for any renewal of our Catholic identity, of any “New Evangelization”.

Posted in SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged ,
39 Comments

Catholic institutions are failing because of failing “Catholic identity”

On this blog I have harped incessantly about Catholic identity.   I have proposed that a primary aim of Pope Benedict’s pontificate is to revitalize our Catholic identity.  If we don’t know who we are and what we believe then we will have no impact on the world around us as Catholics. Western civilization is on the ropes, partly because we don’t know who we are and, as a result, we have not been making our indispensable contribution.  We have experienced devastation for the last few decades.  Pope Benedict in engaged in a “Marshall Plan” for rebuilding.

Lately we have seen dramatic results of the loss of Catholic identity. People who still call themselves “Catholic”… better “catholic”… place themselves in direct conflict with the Church and the Church’s Magisterium as exercised by her legitimate teachers.  I dubbed one of the most obvious of these dissident forces the “Magisterium of Nuns“.   They and their  camp-followers and supporters (the Catholic Healthcare Association, the editors of the National Catholic Reporter, the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, etc.) seek to replace what is Catholic with what is “catholic”.  They are not merely trying to force the Church to conform to the world and its trends. In some instances they are also trying to provide for the business of abortion.

I saw a story on CNA which illustrates something of my point.

Consider as a backdrop the conflict in Phoenix over the Catholic character of a once-Catholic hospital, a labor group’s statement that a Catholic college’s self-describing literature demonstrates that the school can’t claim a religious identity in order to avoid unionization, the upcoming closure of many Catholic schools in the Archdiocese of New York.

My emphases and comments:

Weakening of Catholic identity contributes to school enrollment decline, cautions professor

Denver, Colo., Jan 18, 2011 / 06:02 am (CNA/EWTN News).- In the wake of the Archdiocese of New York recently closing 27 of its schools, conversation on the sharp decline of Catholic school enrollment has once again been ignited. One education expert says a weakening of Catholic identity is a primary factor in the school closures.

Dr. John J. Convey, who holds the title of the St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Professor of Education at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., also explained that a lack of school-aged children and waning pastoral leadership have also significantly contributed to school closures.

[…]

Enrollment in Catholic elementary schools has dropped 15 percent nationwide since 2001-02 school year, reported the National Catholic Educational Association. In 2006 and 2007 in the U.S., 212  Catholic schools were closed or consolidated.

In a Jan. 17 e-mail, Dr. Convey, who co-authored the 2009 book “Weathering the Storm: Moving Catholic Schools Forward,” weighed in, saying that numerous factors have contributed to enrollment decline.

He noted that dwindling demographics, what he called an “insufficient number of school-age children,” is a large underlying problem.

The National Center for Health Statistics reported last August that the steadily falling birth rate in the U.S. fell 2.7 percent in 2009, an all time low in the last 100 years.

Dr. Convey also said that “weak leadership” on the part of the principal or the pastor, including the “unwillingness of the pastor to support the school or to promote it to the parish” as another factor.

“This problem is exacerbated if diocesan leadership is not strong or is unwilling to act to rectify the leadership problem,” he added.

Perhaps most disconcerting, Dr. Convey cited a “weak Catholic identity” on the part of Catholic schools either based in actual fact or simply perceived as such by parents.

He said that many families today believe that a Catholic school is not strong enough in the “value-added” component that would make it different from a public or charter school. [Disaster.]

The education expert added that families without sufficient income to afford tuition can be a problem which is “exacerbated if adequate tuition assistance is not available.”

“In some cases, money is an issue; families can’t afford the tuition and insufficient tuition assistance is available to help them. In other cases, parents are unwilling to pay for a Catholic school if they perceive that the public schools, charter schools or other private schools in their area are adequate.[If there isn’t any difference between the Catholic school and the public school, then why pay the extra substantial cost, given the fact that you are already paying taxes?]

Dr. Convey also noted that accusations of sex abuse by clergy have “had an impact on diocesan budgets from huge legal settlements.”

Lastly, he said parents often “don’t sufficiently value Catholic education” and would rather “have their children educated in the public school even though they could afford to send them to a Catholic school.”

Dr. Convey explained that in order to combat plummeting school enrollment, the “Church and each individual Catholic school needs to be more vocal about the importance of the schools and their effectiveness in both the academic and religious formation of the students.[Do I hear an “Amen!”?]

[…]

I would be interested in the comment of readers with children who have at some point made a decision whether to send their kinder to public school or to a Catholic school.

Why did you choose what you chose?

Was the “Catholic identity” issue a factor?

What needs to be done?

Posted in New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
129 Comments

ALERT! Introduction in House of Reps. of “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act.” WDTPRS POLL!

I understand that there is a vote in the House of Representatives tomorrow which concerns the repeal of the pro-abortion “Obamacare” legislation as well as the introduction of the “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act.”

If you have a strong feeling about this, perhaps you would call your congressional representative.

You may have other ways of contacting your representative, but I found this link from the Susan B. Anthony List to be helpful.   All you need to do is type in your zipcode and you will find the phone number of your rep in congress.  Also, there are some talking points.   You could use those or others.

You would do well to call before 5 pm EST.

If you are not in the habit of calling your Representative, you might give it a shot.  They have to be re-elected every two years.  The people who their respectful wishes known get some attention.

It only take a few minutes.  It could make a difference with some representatives, especially those who think they have “cover” from other Catholics to be pro-abortion.

Note: You do not have to registered on this blog to be able to vote in the poll below.

Did you call your representative about this issue?

View Results

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, POLLS, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged , , ,
Comments Off on ALERT! Introduction in House of Reps. of “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act.” WDTPRS POLL!

England and Wales will use new translation in September, not December

The UK’s best Catholic weekly, The Catholic Herald, has a story stating that…

New Mass translation to be used in parishes from September

By Mark Greaves

The new English translation of the Order of Mass will be used in parishes in England and Wales from September, it was announced today. [I wonder if that will be the case elsewhere.  The text has been finalized, so there is hardly any reason not to allow implementation of the new translation.  This is the internet age, a time when we can print out texts at every parish.]

The bishops’ conference said it would be introduced into parishes three months before the new Missal is published in Advent and would thus provide an opportunity for “in-depth catechesis on the Eucharist and renewed devotion in the manner of its celebration”. [Doesn’t that imply that the intense catechesis should start before September?]

The bishops also announced the creation of a website and a DVD to prepare the faithful for the transition.

They confirmed that the new Roman Missal was complete and that the Holy See had given its recognitio.

Bishop Arthur Roche of Leeds, chairman of the International Commission on English in the Liturgy (ICEL), which drafted the new text, said it was “a tremendous opportunity for the Church in England and Wales to learn about our faith and the Mass”. [Yes, so long as priests make the effort.]

The bishop said: “The new translation is a great gift to the Church. The Mass is at the heart of what the Church is, it is where we deepen our faith in Christ and are nourished by him so that we can glorify the Lord by our lives.

“In the new translation we find a text that is more faithful to the Latin text and therefore a text which is richer in its theological content and allusions to the scriptures but also a translation which, I believe, will move people’s hearts and minds in prayer.”  [What, pray tell, is wrong with that?   The new translation is not perfect.  No one has claimed that it is.  ANY translation would still require explanation (=catechesis).  But, for the love of God, let’s jettison the lame-duck translation disaster as soon as possible and get on with it.]

The bishop said he hoped people would use resources provided by the bishops’ conference to prepare for the new translation.

He cited a DVD produced by ICEL, called Become One Body One Spirit in Christ, which has already been sent out to parishes. It features six hours of footage of experts talking about various aspects of the Mass. Bishop Roche said it would help people “uncover the riches that the Eucharist offers us”.

We truly need intense catechesis.

But we need that catechesis because, frankly, we need catechesis, not just because we are getting a new translation.

UPDATE: 2102 GMT:

I learned from Fr. Finigan (who was kind enough to link back here) that the Missal in England will be… well.. here… let him say it:

The CTS website shows A first glimpse of the new Roman Missal with the above photo of a dummy version without any printing or gold blocking on the cover. This paragraph warmed my heart:

Beauty and Practicality
CTS is working with highly-skilled printers and binders in Italy to ensure a high quality of craftsmanship in the finished volume. The choice of paper, binding, marker ribbons and leather page tabs has been made to ensure ease of use and durability over many years.

For the interior, colour illustrations have been sourced from medieval illustrated manuscripts, and decorative elements from skilled contemporary artists and from volumes in the British Library.

Here is the photo:

CTS Roman Missal

Posted in WDTPRS | Tagged ,
21 Comments

Vidi on VIS

This is from VIS:

– Appointed Rev. Keith Newton as first ordinary of the new Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham in the territory of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales. Rev. Newton was born in Liverpool, England in 1952 and ordained a priest in 1976 for the Anglican diocese of Chelmsford. In March 2002 he was ordained as suffragan bishop of Richborough.

Notice anything odd about that?

How extraordinary, as my friends across the pond would say.

Fr. Keith Newton was ordained a priest in Westminster Cathedral on 15 January, for the Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham.  No?

Sure, an announcement can’t say everything about a man’s life, include every point in his CV, and sure, there is a specification of “Anglican” in the announcement above, but… perhaps I am being too touchy… would it have been out of place to mention that he was ordained a Catholic priest at some point?  Or… is this an instance of the “bella figura” bone in someone’s head kicking in?  Are they trying to avoid the “heri catechumenus hodie pontifex” thing.  Dunno.

It just stuck me as …. odd.

By the way… have you ever noticed that VIS has a combox?   I suspect the powers-that-be would rather be eaten alive by wild swamp rats than publish comments, but… somebody reads them.

Posted in The Drill |
26 Comments

Christian leaders against deviant activists ‘hijacking’ Martin Luther King

What did Martin Luther King really say?

He didn’t, and wouldn’t, say that there was a moral equivalence between skin color and deviant inclinations.

From CNA with my emphases and comments:

Christian leaders rally against gay activists ‘hijacking’ Martin Luther King legacy
By Kevin J. Jones

Atlanta, Ga., Jan 17, 2011 / 02:12 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- On the observance of Martin Luther King Day, African-American leaders noted the slain civil rights figure’s Christian position on cultural issues like abortion and sexual ethics. Illinois religious and political leaders also organized to challenge the “hijacking” of the civil rights movement by homosexual political activists.

Dr. Alveda King, full-time director of African-American Outreach for Priests for Life and King’s niece, cited her uncle’s advice columns written for Ebony magazine in 1957 and 1958.

“In advising men and women on questions of personal behavior 50 years ago, Uncle Martin sounded no different than a conservative Christian preacher does now,” she commented. “He was pro-life, pro-abstinence before marriage, and based his views on the unchanging Word of the Bible. Today, Planned Parenthood would condemn Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. as part of the ‘religious right’.

King reported that one of her uncle’s columns concerned a young man who had impregnated his girlfriend and refused to marry her, resulting in a “crime,” a euphemism for abortion. Martin Luther King, Jr. advised the man that he had made a “mistake.”

He also urged another reader to abstain from premarital sex, saying that such activity was contributing to “the present breakdown of the family.”

“Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a man of peace, justice, and most of all a man of God,” Alveda King continued, suggesting that he would be working today to secure justice for those in the womb endangered by abortion.

In Hillside, Illinois more than 40 African-American religious and political leaders gathered on Jan. 17 at Freedom Baptist Church to lament the misrepresentation of King’s legacy. [Here it comes…] During the Illinois House debate on the issue of civil unions for homosexuals, two backers of the proposal compared same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage.

[Bogus] Comparisons between homosexual rights and civil rights have become increasingly common in recent decades. In its own Martin Luther King Day message, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force’s executive director Rea Carey also [crassly] invoked the leader.

“We believe that were he alive today, Dr. King would be standing with the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community as we too reach for equality,” she said. [and returned to her hallucinogenic mushrooms.]

However, the press conference of African-American leaders in Illinois challenged this view. Its announcement denied that opposition to discrimination based on “immutable, non-behavioral, morally neutral condition like race” was equivalent to an effort to “normalize and institutionalize deviant sexual relations.

David Smith, executive director of the Illinois Family Institute, was of a similar view.

Skin color is not analogous to behavior,” he said.

Homosexual activists and their allies are advancing their subversive moral and political goals by hijacking the rhetoric of the Civil Rights Movement and Martin Luther King Jr.’s legacy,” [Well put.] the Institute said in a press release. It said attempts to associate “philosophical conservatives” with racism and bigotry constituted intimidation.

“We shouldn’t allow the exploitation of the legacy of Dr. King to be exploited for the destructive purposes of the movement to normalize homosexuality and demonize traditional moral beliefs.”

A similar press conference was scheduled to take place in East St. Louis.

Posted in Throwing a Nutty | Tagged ,
49 Comments

Continence and married deacons/priests

Yet another about deacons.  This would also concern priests in the Latin Church who, as married ministers in other churches, were received into the Roman Church and ordained.

A few days ago distinguished canonist Ed Peters posted on his fine blog an entry about CIC 1983 277, which concerns clerical “continence”.

I particularly liked his statment:

Canon 277 (and the immemorial tradition behind it) either means what I say it means, or it doesn’t.

The Catholic Encyclopedia defines “continence”:

Continence may be defined as abstinence from even the licit gratifications of marriage. It is a form of the virtue of temperance, though Aristotle did not accord it this high character since it involved a conflict with wrong desires–an element, in the mind of the philosopher, foreign to the content of a virtue in the strict sense. Continence, it is seen, has a more restricted significance than chastity, since the latter finds place in the condition of marriage. The abstinence we are discussing, then, belongs to the state of celibacy, though clearly the notion of this latter does not necessarily involve that of continence.

Prof. Peters has stirred up the ant hill, for sure.

Now he has posted: “Why Canon 277 § 3 does not allow bishops to exempt clerics from the obligation of continence

I shall carefully watch the unfolding drama.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , ,
90 Comments

REVIEW: 2011 Angelus Press Calendar

The kind folks at Angelus Press sent me again this year their wall calendar.

ordination

This year the calendar features beautiful photos of the illicit but valid ordinations to the priesthood of some of their members, and, it appears, a benedictine monk (at least a religious with hair shaved in the “corona”).

The photos take you through the main points of the older form of ordination, showing some things that are now, sadly, missing.  They should be restored, in my opinion.  I digress.

The days show indications for fasting.

I look forward to the day that when men who are ordained to the SSPX they will be able to exercise their priestly functions licitly, side by side with the Church’s priests, and they will contribute as well to the restoration of so much that we have lost, particularly in our Catholic worship.

In the meantime, nice calendar.

Posted in REVIEWS | Tagged , ,
23 Comments