Connection of liturgical abuse and abuse of minors?

I read an interesting take today with a new view of a possible nexus of abuse of children by women religious and priests and, on the other hand liturgical abuse of congregations by women religious and priests.

On the blog MommyWrites comes, the writer starts with an explanation that she is teaching CCD to 2nd graders… may God bless her.  She describes a video that has something to do with her mandatory VIRTUS program.  The video showed how to deal with children and it showed really bad liturgy.  She makes a very interesting point toward the end. 

Here is what she said:

As I watched, I wondered what message the Bishops were trying to send by including bad liturgy in the Virtus video.

1. Was it supposed to evoke warm fuzzy feelings? “Why, that parish is just like MY parish!” It didn’t, because those liturgical abuses wouldn’t fly around here.

2. Was it supposed to show us what the Bishops think a parish SHOULD look like? If so, I weep for our Church.

3. Or was it something more subtle? Was it supposed to help us make the connection between Liturgical abuse and sexual abuse? [NB:] After all, if we can’t treat the body of our Lord and Saviour with respect, why would we treat the bodies of our neighbors with respect? Is there a short, slippery slope that runs between sloppiness at Mass and sin?

I have a feeling that the makers of the video were aiming for 1 and 2. But I think our pope would probably point to number 3. When we take Mass and the Eucharist seriously and let all our relationships flow forth from that first, essential relationship as Christ, we cannot use other people as objects. When the Mass goes, everything else starts to go too.

Of course, abuse can happen in ‘Good Liturgy’ settings too – because good liturgy can not be our goal. Our goal is to love and adore Christ. I think that a reverent liturgy flows naturally from a love of Christ in the Eucharist and a realization that we’re in the presence of God. (For instance, I noticed my 6-year-old’s behavior at Mass has improved DRAMATICALLY since we started attending Children’s adoration once a month.) If you have a nice-looking Liturgy, but no love, it’s just an empty pageant.

On the other hand, most awful liturgies are also empty pageants, focused on the congregation instead of the Divine.

In the end, I did learn something at Virtus training. Father Z is right. “Save the Liturgy, Save the World.” It’s not a coincidence that the pope who is focused on cleaning up the filth of abuse in the Church is also focused on cleaning up the Liturgy. If we can’t respect God, we won’t respect each other.

 

Interesting.

I wonder if it is possible to make a connection at this point with those who are trying to poison the atmosphere regarding the implementation of the new English translation.

Posted in Clerical Sexual Abuse | Tagged , , ,
55 Comments

Whose feast today in the Roman Calendar?

According to the 2005 Martyrologium Romanum today is  …

1. Commemoratio sancti Iosue, filii Nun, servi Domini, qui, cum Moyses manus ei imposuisset, repletus est spiritu sapientiae et post Moysis mortem populum Israel per Iordanis alveum in terram promissionis mirabiliter introduxit.

Anyone want to take a crack at this?

Today is also the feast of St. Egidius, called St. Glies, Abbot.

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged ,
40 Comments

A Mystic Monk Memo

While I was ordering some Mystic Monk Coffee for myself, I noticed that they sell large format bags of 5 lbs.

This would be a good idea for rectories and religious houses or simply for all of you who consume a lot of coffee!

Buy coffee from the monks in larger amounts!

Do the math: $6 per pound.  A 1 pound bag from Starbucks is usually around $10.95. So…

I’m Fr. Z, and I endorse this coffee!
  • REVIEW: Mystic Monk Coffee
  • Pounds and Grounds and Compounds

 

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
22 Comments

An alternate altar design for Cofton Park

Thanks to the great Vincenzo, we can see how to rescue the design for the big Papal Mass at Cofton Park.

For some background:

WDTPRS POLL: sanctuary design for Pope Benedict’s visit to England

UPDATE: 1 Sept 17:52 GMT:

I see that England’s best Catholic weekly, The Catholic Herald has linked to the original post with the WDTPRS POLL.  Perhaps you readers might reciprocate and contribute well-considered and respectful comments in the discussion over there as well.

Posted in Lighter fare |
13 Comments

OH THE HUMANITY!

Vuvuzela or Vuvuzelas or Noise Makers From HellFrom CMR comes this serious and disconcerting story.  Me emphases and comments:

First it was contraception, then abortion. Now the Pope wants to ban something else…Vuvuzelas. [Picture me in my grief.] News reports indicate that Pope Benedict XVI, a former Nazi Youth and former head of the office formerly known as the Inquisition, is now banning the popular musical instrument which brought millions joy during the World Cup. [I would have thought this thing provoked head-pounding despair and suicide after prolonged exposure.]

When Pope Benedict XVI visits England he is expected to draw large crowds but the Vatican’s ban of vuvuzelas has not come without considerable controversy. (In case you don’t know what vuvuzelas are click here)

"Is the Catholic Church just against all fun?" asked one devout Catholic who said he was going to buy a Vuvuzela in protest. "I read somewhere that even Popes back in the…like 1300’s used Vuvuzelas all the time or something. So this edict is totally hypocritical."  [Oh the humanity!]

Some quick polling on the issue showed that American Catholics were split as they are on so many issues. 20 percent of Catholics were for the ban because it is the loudest most annoying sound on Earth, eight percent of Catholic were against the Pope’s condemnation while the rest had never watched a soccer match so had no idea what a Vuvuzela was.

So vehement is the outrage against the Pope’s stringent ban that a new group was established called "Catholics for Vuvuzelas." [Vincenzoooooo?!?  Where are you?] The group, which already has 453 Facebook friends, is believed to be a splinter group of "Catholics for Free Choice." The headline banner of the site reads "My Lips, My Choice."

"The Pope has no right to decree that I can’t use a….whatever that thing is," said one woman who was raised Catholic. "It’s bad enough that the Pope wants to tell us what we can do in our bedroom but to tell us what musical instruments we can use? No way."

When asked if she thought she’d go to Hell for using a vuvuzela she asked, "What’s Hell? I’m not familiar with that term."

One church in California was intending to hold a Teen vuvuzela Mass playing the song catalogue of Peter, Paul and Mary but they canceled the Mass because the guitarists and tambourine players who typically play at the Teen Mass felt slighted and many other said that the vuvuzela was the most annoying sound in the world.

One Teen Mass coordinator said that he believes if someone feels they can get closer to God by using a vuvuzela then they should use it. "Who is the Pope to outlaw someone’s spiritual free expression, man?"

He said he went to see his pastor shortly after the shocking announcement and his priest told him that everyone must ultimately follow their own conscience when it comes to vuvuzelas.

A spokesperson for the United Nations said they may consider funding the distribution of vuvuzelas to Third World countries. Of course, they’ll also put condoms inside.

Posted in Lighter fare, Picture Me In My Grief | Tagged
36 Comments

Archbp. of Westminister’s aide calls Britain ‘hedonistic wasteland…geopolitical epicentre of the culture of death’

UPDATE 2 Sept 1834 GMT:

His Hermeneuticalness, Fr. Finigan, weighs in.

________

From The Guardian with my emphases and comments:

Archbishop’s aide calls Britain a ‘hedonistic wasteland’

Riazat Butt, religous affairs correspondent
1 September 2010 12.02 BST

The Roman Catholic archbishop of Westminster has distanced himself from an aide who said gay rights  and the commercialisation of sex had turned Britain into a "selfish, hedonistic wasteland" and "the geopolitical epicentre of the culture of death". [First, is that true? Second, if that is true, was it right to say it in that position?]

The comments from Edmund Adamus, director of pastoral affairs at the diocese of Westminster and an adviser to the Most Rev Vincent Nichols, have angered gay rights and secularists groups and provoked embarrassment among the Catholic hierarchy weeks before the pope visits Britain.

Senior figures, including Lord Patten of Barnes, have been keen to stress that the UK, while secular, is not anti-Catholic and that the pope is not flying into hostile territory.

Adamus told the Catholic news agency Zenit there was an "aggressive anti-Catholic bias towards the church and the pontiff" in this country that exceeded even countries that violently persecuted Christians.

"Historically, and continuing right now, Britain, and in particular, London, has been and is the geopolitical epicentre of the culture of death.

"Our laws and lawmakers for over 50 years or more have been the most permissively anti-life and progressively anti-family and marriage, in essence one of the most anti-Catholic landscapes, culturally speaking, than even those places where Catholics suffer open persecution." [Our readers in the UK will have to chime in on this.]

He also talked about marriage and the role of men and women, urging Catholics to "exhibit counter-cultural signals against the selfish, hedonistic wasteland that is the objectification of women for sexual gratification." [Isn’t this the sort of thing that one should hear from bishops rather than just from bishops’ aides?]

"Britain in particular, with its ever-increasing commercialisation of sex, not to mention its permissive laws advancing the ‘gay’ agenda, is such a wasteland."

A spokesman for Nichols said the views expressed by Adamus "did not reflect the archbishop’s opinions". [?]

Ben Summerskill, from the gay rights group Stonewall, said the comments were "gratuitously offensive". ["gratuitously??]

He told the Independent: "The gratuitously offensive comments being made by the archbishop’s adviser are hardly likely to promote sensitive debate about respect for religion in the 21st century. [What a curious way to reframe the context.] You would think that, given its present status, the Roman Catholic church in Britain would be slightly more sensitive about wagging its finger at other people".

 

So, the Church has had sinners as members, therefore the Church shouldn’t raise it’s voice in public.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged
50 Comments

QUAERITUR: Swiss Eucharistic Prayer

From a reader:

This morning at Mass the priest used the 3rd Swiss Eucharistic prayer.  Is that licit?  What are the other Eucharistic prayers that are allowed other than 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the one for Masses with Children?  Can you shed some light on this one?  Currently, I believe Mass this morning was valid but not licit.  Am I right?

For the USA, in 1994 the then-NCCB approved a translation of the "Eucharistic Prayer for Various Needs and Occasions".

This prayer had its origin in a prayer composed in the 70’s for a Swiss synod.  It has some variations based on different themes: "The Church on the Way to Unity," "God Guides the Church on the Way of Salvation," "Jesus, Way to the Father," and "Jesus, the Compassion of God." It is printed as one prayer but it is really four different prayers. 

But, from what you wrote, yes… it was licit.   This Swiss prayer was approved for use in the U.S.A.  I don’t know about other countries.

I don’t use it.  I won’t use it.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
13 Comments

QUAERITUR: self-communication from the chalice

From a reader:

I have a question about self-communication. I was at a monastery this weekend for a retreat and a monks allowed the laity to receive the Chalice. How they did it was a bit odd though. A lay brother took the chalice and set it on a table and stood by it. The communicants would go up. The brother would say "Blood of Christ" and the communicant would take the Chalice themselves and receive the Precious Blood and put the Chalice back down. The brother never held the Chalice during distribution. I didn’t receive this way because I wasn’t sure if it was permitted (and since I received the Host I didn’t think it was necessary). Is this considered self communication or am I being too scrupulous?

 

That is self-communication and it is not permitted.

The "Norms for the Distribution and Reception of Holy Communion Under Both Kinds in the Dioceses of the United States of America" state:

 

44. The chalice may never be left on the altar or another place to be picked up by the communicant for self-communication (except in the case of concelebrating bishops or priests), nor may the chalice be passed from one communicant to another. There shall always be a minister of the chalice.

 

This describes what is necessary in the USA.  I am reasonably sure that the norms are pretty much the same everywhere.

 

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , ,
9 Comments

A different take on “active participation”

I hear there was recently another attempted ordination of a wymyn in Arizona.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
15 Comments

WDTPRS POLL: sanctuary design for Pope Benedict’s visit to England

UPDATE: 1 Sept 17:52 GMT:

I see that England’s best Catholic weekly, The Catholic Herald has linked to this post.  Perhaps you readers might reciprocate and contribute well-considered and respectful comments in the discussion over there as well.

__________

I dunno…  I need a WDTPRS POLL on this.

Damian posted this at his place.

This image of the sanctuary for the Beatification of John Henry Newman by the Pope at  has just been published on the papal visit website.

What do you think?

design for Pope Benedict's Mass at Cofton Park, England, for the Beatification of John Henry Newman

There are more photos at the papal visit website if you want more angles.

Please pick the best response and then give your reasons in the combox, below.

{democracy:77}

 

Posted in POLLS | Tagged
137 Comments