REVIEW: Mystic Monk Coffee

was so impressed by the proposed plans for the new Carmelite Monastery in Wyoming, that I decided to check out Mystic Monk Coffee and help them peddle some.

Pounds and Grounds and Compounds

I developed a strong interest in good coffee when, for a few years, I had a job in a coffee/tea store long before the invasion of Starbucks and Caribou was spotted on the horizon.  We designed our own blends and roasted our own beans.

I am in Kansas City, visiting a friend, who purchased some varieties of Mystic Monk Coffee.  I have now had a chance to try a few of them.

In my mug right now is Midnight Vigils Blend.

I am favorably impressed.

I prefer a sturdy bean (Sumatra is a favorite) and dark roast.  I like my coffee very strong.

The Mystic Monk does it for me.

I endorse this coffee.  I have decided to change my own coffee drinking patterns. It is competitively priced compared to, say, Starbucks (which I have been been buying), especially when you consider free shipping on their 4 Bag Sampler.

Furthermore, buying coffee from the monks will help the monks.  As a bonus, if you buy it through my link, you will help me as well.

You can buy their coffee HERE and help them build their place while fueling your caffeine addiction.

What’s not to like?

Buy coffee.  Build a monastery.

UPDATE 31 Aug 21:23 GMT

I just saw that you can buy their coffee in larger amounts!

Posted in REVIEWS | Tagged , , ,
Comments Off on REVIEW: Mystic Monk Coffee

WDTPRS: 14th Sunday after Pentecost

Today’s prayer survived the snipping and pasting of the Consilium and the late Rev. Annibale Bugnini’s liturgical experts to be used on Tuesday of the 2nd week of Lent.

COLLECT (1962MR):

Custodi, Domine, quaesumus,
Ecclesiam tuam propitiatione perpetua:
et quia sine te labitur humana mortalitas;
tuis semper auxiliis et abstrahatur a noxiis,
et ad salutaria dirigatur.

Propitiatio, in its fundamental meaning, is “an appeasing, atonement,  propitiation”.  The dictionary of liturgical Latin Blaise/Dumas also gives us a view of the word as “favor”.  This makes sense.  God has been appeased and rendered favorable again towards us sinners by the propitiatory actions Christ fulfilled on the Cross.  We have renewed these through the centuries in Holy Mass.

Mortalitas refers, as you might guess, to the fact that we die, our mortality.  Inherent in the word is the concept that we die in our flesh.  So, you ought also to hear “flesh” when you hear mortalitas

Labitur is from labor.  This is not the substantive labor but the verb, labor, lapsus.  It means, “to glide, fall, to move gently along a smooth surface, to fall, slide”.

Auxilium, in the plural, has a military overtone.  There is also a medical undertone too, “an antidote, remedy, in the most extended sense of the word”.  Pair this up with noxius, a, um, which points at things which are injurious or harmful.  There is a moral element as well or “a fault, offence, trespass”.

Salutaria is the plural of neuter salutare which looks like an infinitive but isn’t.  Our constant companion the Lewis & Short Dictionary says the neuter substantive salutare is “salvation, deliverance, health” in later Latin.  The adjectival form, salutaris, is “of or belonging to well-being, healthful, wholesome”.  Think of English “salutary” and O salutaris hostia in the Eucharistic hymn by St. Thomas Aquinas (+1274). 

When this word is in the neuter plural (salutaria) there is a phrase in Latin bibere salutaria alicui … to drink one’s health” or literally “to drink healths to someone”.  In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet during the famous “Queen Mab” speech Mercutio declares that a soldier dreams, inter alia, of “healths five fathom deep,” (I, iv) and in Henry VIII  the King says to Cardinal Wolsey, “I have half a dozen healths to drink to these” (I, iv).

Wine and health are closely related in the ancient world. In the parable of the Good Samaritan the good passerby pours oil and wine into the wounds of the man who was assaulted (Luke 10:25-37). St. Paul wrote to St. Timothy: “No longer drink only water, but take a little wine for the sake of your stomach and your frequent ailments” (1 Tim 5:23). 

Apart from its resemblance to blood, it is no surprise that Christ should choose this healthful daily staple as the matter of our saving Sacrament. 

Wine was often safer to drink than water in the ancient world, though it was nearly always mixed with water to some extent. To drink uncut wine, merum in Latin (from the adjective merus “unadulterated”, giving us the English word “mere”) was considered barbaric. Cicero (+43 BC) and others hurled that accusation at Marcus Antonius (+31 BC) who was a renowned merum swiller.

Catholics sing the word merum in the hymn of the Holy Thursday liturgy, Pange lingua gloriosi, by St. Thomas Aquinas: “fitque sanguis Christi merum… and the wine becomes the Blood of Christ”. In sacramental terms, there is a link between wine and health in the sense of salvation. During Holy Mass, we offer gifts of wine with water to become our spiritual “healths” once it is changed into the Blood of Christ. These archaic and literary references help us drill into the language of our prayers.

Let’s drill some more.  Did you know that the index finger was called digitus salutaris, and that the ancient Romans held it up when greeting people? We don’t do that very often these days.  I believe modern usage, at least on roadways, more commonly employs a different finger. The special designations of fingers in Latin are pollex (thumb); index or salutaris (forefinger); medius, infamis or impudicus (middle finger); minimo proximus or medicinalis (ring finger); minimus (little finger, “pinky”).  The priest, during Mass, always held the consecrated Host only between his thumb and the digitus salutaris.  One way to harm a priest, our mediator at the altar and in the confessional, was to chop off his index fingers.  Priests were forbidden to say Mass without special permission from the Holy See and those fingers were clearly understood by those who hate the Church, priesthood, and the Eucharist as being especially important. 

Let’s push this a little more. 

The adjective medicinalis, “medicinal, healing”, comes from the verb medeor or medico, the original meaning of which has to do with “to heal” by magic. The verb traces back to the stem med– or “middle”.  So, medicus, “doctor” is associated with “mediator”.  We can think of this in terms of the English word “medium”, who is a mediator with the spirit world.  The Latin poet Silius Italicus (Tiberius Catius Asconius Silius Italicus +101) called magicians medicum vulgus (Punica, III, 300). The ancients saw what we call the “ring finger” as having magical powers.  This is reflected in the name digitus medicinalis, the “medicinal/magic” finger.

One of the most important Patristic Christological images in the ancient Church is Christus Medicus, the “Physician”. St. Augustine does amazing things with this image, and Christus Mediator.  He is the doctor of the ailing soul.  He is the only mediator between God and man.   

LITERAL TRANSLATION:
Guard your Church, we beseech You, O Lord,
with perpetual favor,
and since without You our mortal flesh slides toward ruin
by means of your helping remedies let it be pulled back from injuries
and be guided unto saving healths.

We all know the image of the slippery slope.  Once you are on this slope, scrabble and scratch as you can, you can’t get a purchase. 

You slide and slide, faster and faster. 

Down. 

Our fallen nature and our habitual sins drag us onto the slope from which we cannot save ourselves.  In the sacraments and teachings of Holy Church, Christ extends the fingers of His saving hand. 

He draws us back from a deadly slide.

Watch how the old incarnation of ICEL ruined the imagery in the lame-duck version we still hear in our churches today.

ICEL (1973 translation of the 1970MR):
Lord, watch over your Church,
and guide it with your unfailing love.
Protect us from what could harm us
and lead us to what will save us.
Help us always, for without you we are bound to fail.

There are different ways to do this, but I wanted to place in evidence the image of health and the flesh and medicine.

Posted in WDTPRS |
6 Comments

QUAERITUR: In the USA is it against the law to kneel for Communion?

From a reader:

I know this may seem a bit odd, but  I was hoping to get your perspective on the U.S. GIRM 160, which states:  "The norm for reception of holy Communion in the dioceses of the United States is standing. Communicants should not be denied holy Communion because they kneel. Rather, such instances should be addressed pastorally, by providing the faithful with proper catechesis on the reasons for this norm."
 
There are people, including the popular and much visited website, Catholic Answers who have spoken that kneeling for communion is inappropriate as it goes against the norm in the United States, and that one is disobedient if one still chooses to kneel even after having been "pastorally" corrected as to the proper norm in the country. 

Can you provide further clarification according to your knowledge as to whether or not it is "licit" for one to kneel in the U.S. even though it may not be the U.S. norm, and whether or not one is disobedient after being "pastorally" corrected according to U.S. GIRM 160.

Since this veered into the technical, I consulted a canon lawyer before answering.  I will adapt his response with my own.

Part of a response must involve what "norm" means.  I admit that I use the term "norm" rather loosely when writing and talking, and often morph it into "laws", and vice versa.

A norm is not the same as a law.

The "norm" for the U.S., in accordance with GIRM 160, is that communicants stand when receiving Holy Communion.

One thing we have learned from post-modernists, is also to read a text for what it doesn’t say.  GIRM 160 doesn’t say, "In the United States, Holy Communion must be received while standing."   That would be a disciplinary liturgical law.   It would require a dispensation to do something different (i.e., to kneel).

Rather, GIRM 160 in the USA is a norm.   That is to say it points to a normative thing, the usual practice, the custom.  In 25 years we can have a discussion on what legal force this custom has, but now is not the time.  

What the U.S. bishops did in including this norm, with the approval of the Holy See, is state that the normal manner of receiving Holy Communion, in the United States, is standing.   The usual way… it is customary now.

The addition of the second statement (communicants "should not be denied Holy Communion because they kneel") shows that the norm is not some sort of enforceable law.

The situation is to be addressed "pastorally", with explanations, catechesis, etc.  Once people have been provided with this, if they chose to continue to kneel they are not being disobedient. They do not do something illicit.  They have chosen to follow a practice that differs from the norm.  That does not violate a law.

Moreover, whereas a Fr. M might go to lengths to explain that the "reasons for the norm" are excellent because, after all, we members of the Resurrection people (whose name is Alleluia) are all grown up now as modern men and women and, no longer cling to out-dated oppressive hierarchical and patriarchal, Eurocentric feudal habits we therefore must stand in self-affirmation, a Fr. Z might describe the "reasons for the norm" otherwise, and add that we miserable sinners know that we are unworthy to approach the ineffable gift won for us in the bloody Sacrifice of Calvary, and, humbly recognizing the need for a Savior, therefore appropriately kneel in the presence of the Almighty GOD.

It’s all a matter of pastoral nuance.

It is not proper to accuse someone who kneels of being disobedient. 

One could go into various digressions about whether people who kneel when everyone else is standing are really just drawing attention to themselves.  Are they perhaps creating a traffic problem?

My favorite objection, by the way, is "Someone might trip over their legs!"

I will turn this around and argue that, for insurance purposes, there should not be a dangerous chow line approach with the potential of hazardous legs unexpectedly thrown in front of the unsuspecting.  Far better, and safer for insurance purposes – as well as charity and common sense – would be to spread out the communicants in a line, say parallel to the edge of the sanctuary, perhaps even where the nave and sanctuary come together.  There people could kneel and not be obstacles.  Furthermore, again for insurance purposes and charity and common sense, perhaps there could be a low supporting structure along that line across the sanctuary where people might kneel.  This low supporting structure could at once have a theological purpose pointing to the area of the nave where the baptized – according to their own dignity – have a place that the priest will not often confuse with his own place, but it could also have a practical purpose, giving older people an aid for kneeling and rising with greater ease.

I don’t know… maybe someone could figure out how that might work, what that low supporting structure might look like, etc.  It might need, come to think of it, some sort of gate to permit entrance to the sanctuary. 

We have to be practical.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , , ,
97 Comments

QUAERITUR: important kitchen tools

Here is a change of pace.

A reader recently asked me about necessary cooking tools.

Among the several things which more obvious, good bowls are essential. Sturdy, heat resistant and in different sizes.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
25 Comments

“If you aren’t a conservative by the time you are 40, you don’t have a brain”

My friend The Motley Monk has an interesting insight (me emphases and comments:

Most people surely have heard the aphorism, "If you aren’t a liberal when you are 20, you don’t have a heart….but if you aren’t a conservative by the time you are 40, you don’t have a brain."

My father stated that aphorism to me when I spearheaded the local McGovern campaign effort in 1976, much to my father’s chagrin. [Perhaps ’72?  It will not surprise many of the readers here that a very young WDTPRS helped the Nixon campaign.]

The Motley Monk is beginning to wonder if this aphorism will continue to describe the state of nature.  With the federal government increasingly extending its reach into the lives of most Americans since the 1960s, dependency upon government "largesse"—Medicare, Medicaid, and other social spending programs—will likely create a larger class of citizens 30+ years of age who won’t possess the capital that normally would stimulate thought about capital and its preservation.

Will social and political conservatives end up going the way of dinosaurs via social and political evolution?

Perhaps…unless conservatives are able to re-direct their focus away from simply describing the virtues of building capital and more toward the real loss of capital today’s young people will experience as the government takes more and more control over the lives of citizens (through confiscatory taxes imposed upon things like gasoline, electricity, gas, medical care, etc.) and the concomitant loss of freedom to earn and to save (or spend) as one pleases.

In The Motley Monk’s opinion, Americans have become all too unthinking about their loss of liberty which, in turn, will cause a loss of capital. In this matter, The Motley Monk agrees with Beck and Napolitano (not Janet but Judge).

The Motley Monk also has a combox.  Use it too.

Release the Kraken.

Posted in Linking Back |
72 Comments

How to deal with frustration

This afternoon I was pretty frustrated, due to blog problems, and also due to a break down in communication with someone.  Therefore, I took my frustrations out on some garden produce.

What to do?  In case of doubt, make pasta.

How about fresh pasta?

I had one egg left, so… just enough for me!

After working it together and kneading it, I wrapped it up and left it to rest.

I started the spinach.  I have to cook it down and get all the moisture out.

Have some Campari and soda….

Start making the sauce… pretty simple.  Just butter and sage.

Know what I am making yet?

I haven’t used the pasta machine for a while.

Once my pasta was rolled out I had to combine the spinach with ricotta.

Ooooppps.

I thought I had ricotta in the freezer.  No joy.

Emergency mix-up: cream cheese and grated parmigiana worked together with my very well-dried spinach.

I made these big ravioli will lots of filling and hoped they would stay closed.

The remnant was worked into fettucine.

Spinach-filled ravioloni with sage butter, black pepper and grated cheese.

In hindsight I should have put them on a flat plate.

For the left over pasta cut as fettucine – I reached for the basket.

I used a yellow tomato and little red ones cooked fast in – pretty much nothing – and snipped fresh basil over the lot with grated cheese and pepper and some really good olive oil.

Fast and neat and really good.

Thanks garden!

 

Posted in Fr. Z's Kitchen | Tagged
47 Comments

Detroit 26 Sept – Benefit Dinner for Call To Holiness

If you are in the Detroit, or even if you are farther away, you might pencil in 26 September.

You may have heard of the Call To Holiness Conferences held annually in the Detroit area.   These conferences serve as a faithful Catholic contrast to the dissenting Call To Action thing, which also started in Detroit.

There will be a benefit dinner to support the 2011 Call To Holiness Conference.

Benefit Dinner
Sunday, September 26, 2010
3:00 p.m.
Burton Manor, Livonia
27777 Schoolcraft Road

(I-96 Between Middlebelt & Inkster Roads)

Keynote Speaker: Steve Ray

Defending the Faith:
Facing the Challengers

Steve is an author and an international speaker, recently
returned from speaking engagements in Australia
and the Philippines. He is the producer of the
award winning video series, the Footprints of God,
filmed entirely in the Holy Land and is a regular guest
on Catholic Answers and Catholic Radio.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
1 Comment

The Feeder Feed: feathers

Some shots from the feeder.Twitter

I have taken to calling this one Moses.

This is not a molting thing. 

This bird has been coming for a long time and has always had these little tufts.

Hummingbirds are also interested in the grape jelly set out for the Orioles.

A molting Blue Jay.

One of the last Grosbeaks.

A molting Cardinal.

And just because this is such a cheerful shot.

Posted in The Feeder Feed |
19 Comments

Traditional Confirmations in London

I am happy to report that in London, at St. James Church, Spanish Place, confirmandi will receive the Sacrament of Confirmation in the older, traditional, Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite at the hands of Bishop George Stack, auxiliary bishop of Westminster.

The rite will take place on 20 November 2010.

Contact them for information: info@latin-mass-society.org

 

Posted in Brick by Brick |
10 Comments

Video interview of Msgr. Charles Scicluna: “words of fire”

My friend Greg Burke, the Rome correspondent for Fox News, scored an interview – video interview – with Msgr. Charles Scicluna of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith who handles graviora delicta cases.

Vatican Prosecutor: Pope Showed “Frustration and Anger” Over Abuse Cases
August 23, 2010 – 8:51 AM | by: Greg Burke

In an extensive interview with Fox News, the chief Vatican prosecutor for clerical sex abuse cases, Monsignor Charles Scicluna, said he watched Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger’s “compassion, anger and frustration” as the future pope reviewed hundreds of cases between 2002-2005.

When asked if those three years fundamentally changed Ratzinger’s view of the abuse scandal, Scicluna said the experience would change anybody.

“I think it was an eye-opener to the gravity of the situation and to the great sadness of priestly betrayal and priestly failure,” he said.  “I think that anybody who has to review so many cases will certainly change his perspective on things, on human failings, but also on the great suffering they create.”

While Benedict has been accused of mishandling abuse cases, as an Archbishop in Germany, and also as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome, Scicluna rejected those charges.

The priest, who grew up on the island of Malta, said those who worked with the future Pope in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith were full of admiration for him and his “courage and determination” in dealing with the crisis.

I am a direct witness to the compassion, the frustration and the anger that these cases instilled in Cardinal Ratzinger, the man, Joseph Ratzinger,” Scicluna said.

While Scicluna seems determined to avoid using the term “crisis,” he insists on calling sin by its name, and crime as well. [Do I hear an "Amen!"?]

“People call this a crisis,” he said. “It is certainly a challenge to the Church, but it is an opportunity. It is an opportunity to call sin sin in its face, and do something about it. It is an opportunity for the church to show itself determined in its fight against sin, against crime.”

While the sexual abuse of minors clearly does not take place only in church circles, Fox asked Scicluna if he thought the Catholic Church should be held to a higher standard.

“I think so,” Scicluna responded.  “Because we do stand for a very clear message which should be a light to the world. So we do complain about the headlines sometimes, but the headlines are a reflection that the world takes what we say very seriously, and is scandalized when what we do does not correspond to what we say.”

Scicluna, whose official title is the Promoter of Justice in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, said a priest who abuses makes a “mockery” of his vocation.

There is a sacred trust which has been violated,” he said.  “The priest has been ordained to be an icon, a living image of Jesus Christ. He is another Christ at the altar, when he preaches. Now when he abuses, he shatters that icon.”

He said the Church has to face up to the truth, even if it’s not very nice: “There’s no other way out of this situation, except facing the truth of the matter.”

Scicluna said the Church has to be severe with offenders, as Christ was: “He had words of fire against people who would scandalize the young. And if we stick to his words and are loyal to his teaching, we are on very good ground. We are not alone.”

Posted in Clerical Sexual Abuse | Tagged , , ,
14 Comments