PRAYERCAzT: Lauds (Breviarium Romanum)

I did this yesterday afternoon.  I thought it might be interesting to see what happens in the morning.

I turned on the mic and read Lauds from the Breviarium Romanum.  Nothing fancy.

Perhaps some weary priest out there might listen.

Posted in PRAYERCAzT: What Does The (Latin) Prayer Really Sound L | Tagged
3 Comments

PRAYERCAzT: Vespers (Breviarium Romanum)

Sometimes I get tired enough that I would almost be willing to pay someone to read my office to me so that I don’t have to read more words.

Anyway… I just turned on the mic and read, since I had to read my office anyway.

Sometimes, often, I use the Breviarium Romanum.

BTW… that is how the PODCAzTs started.

Some tired priest out there can say a prayer for me after listening.

Posted in PRAYERCAzT: What Does The (Latin) Prayer Really Sound L | Tagged
12 Comments

comic relief

This is how I felt getting up today and thinking about the news I would read.

An editorial cartoon… Michael Ramirez!

 

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Clerical Sexual Abuse, Lighter fare | Tagged
9 Comments

Omnibus omnia factus sum

From a reader:

I thought perhaps you could use an anecdote today.  I have my 8th grade students researching a project on whether the priest should face "ad populum" or "ad orientem."  With this I posted a few articles from WDTPRS concerning the topic.  However, most of them were more intrigued by your animated hamster at the bottom of the the screen!  They spent most of their time playing with it rather than doing their work.  They thought it was "cute" though, and named it "Hammy."  Just thought I’d pass it on.

 

 

Posted in Lighter fare |
23 Comments

QUAERITUR: good commentary on Sacrosanctum Concilium

From a reader:

I am currently taking an Intro to Liturgy course for my MA in Theology program.  I am not entirely sure that what is being taught is orthodox.  The professor certainly seems to have a liberal bend.  We recently read Sacrosanctum Concilium, as well as some commentaries on the document written by some questionable authors.  I was wondering if you could recommend any books or articles that explain SC from an orthodox perspective.  I just feel like he conveniently left some things out.  Any other book recommendations you can provide that may help me combat any heterodoxy taught for the rest of the class would be greatly appreciated.

 

I am oppressed with other things at the moment.

Can readers help?

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
26 Comments

Weigel’s piece in First Things… then Fr. Z rants

Preface: I urge priests and bishops reading this to at the very least skip to the last part if you think you don’t have time to read the whole.

_____

George Weigel has a piece in First Things which merits a reading.

I teased out a few salient points for you atention.  I will add something at the end.  My emphases and comments.

The realization among serious Catholics that this is not 2002 and that things have changed dramatically since 2002, has led to a far more confident effort to fight back against misrepresentations such as those the Times perpetrated on March 25. There is a danger here: to recognize that this is not 2002 cannot blind us to the fact that there are wounds that remain to be healed, reforms of priestly formation that remain to be completed, ["Amen!" to that!] bishops whose failures remain to be recognized and dealt with, new norms for the selection of bishops to be implemented, [?] and accounts rendered as to why the Vatican, prior to Ratzinger’s taking control of the issue of clerical sexual abuse in the late 1990s, was sometimes sluggish in its response to scandalous behavior by priests and deficient leadership by bishops. …

Nailing down that counter-narrative would be considerably aided if, in the coming weeks, a comprehensive and documented narrative of the case of a predatory Munich priest which was mishandled during Ratzinger’s tenure as archbishop there—the revelation of which was the European ground zero for the latest set of explosions—would be published. It would also be helpful if the Holy See would provide a user-friendly explanation of how abusive priests are laicized, and how this process has been streamlined and accelerated, again under Ratzinger’s leadership. …

In the face of all this, [UK readers take note…] the bishops of Britain must recognize that scandal-mongering has now metastasized into a full-scale assault on Catholicism itself, and ought to devote the next four months to the most vigorous defense of the truth of Catholic faith. …

Yet if 2010 is not to become 2002 redivivus, the Holy See must make unmistakably clear that it is serious about dealing with malfeasant bishops: [Do I hear an "Amen!"?] that, in addition to swift action against abusive priests, the Church is prepared to take swift and decisive action against episcopal misgovernance. …

Cynicism and irony are powerful corrosives in ecclesiastical life. [Read closely…] Yet they cannot withstand the power of radical conversion, joyful discipleship, and courageous evangelism. [More on this below.] In North America, in Great Britain and Ireland, in Germany and Austria and the Netherlands, indeed all over the world Church, these are the most effective counters to the current wave of Church-bashing and Catholic-baiting.

 

I don’t think it is too much of a stretch to connect the wave of attacks on the Church and misrepresentation to the attempt to divide and subborn Catholics – through the crack of weak-identity liberal Catholics – undertaken by the present White House administration and its willing enablers, such as the administration of the University of Notre Dame.  I think the larger view of seemingly isolated incidents suggests that there is a connection.

As a result, and picking up on what Mr. Weigel wrote at the end – about the power of joyful evangelism – I will add here below with a few edits part of my Liturgico-Political Manifesto I wrote after the the Debacle at Notre Shame.

I urge all priests and bishops who read this blog with any slight quaver of resonance or benevolence, to consider this with care:

If you sense that something quite serious and important is going on right now, for the love of God rethink your approach to how you foster Holy Church’s proper public worship.

Do all in your power and through your influence to foster a worship of God which conforms not to worldly goals – as praiseworthy as they may be in a world still dominated by its dire prince – but rather to the real point of religion: an encounter with mystery

Our worship must become more and more focused on the one who is Other.  Seek what is truly above in your rites and raise people to encounter mystery.

You will be challenged and reviled, blocked and attacked as you do.  You will be worn down and afraid under the weight of resistance.

But I think that to save the world we must save the liturgy.

The present round of attacks on the Church, which suggest a deeper agenda, confirm this.

Secularist and secularizing forces can’t compete with the fullness of Catholic liturgy and sound preaching.

Reforming the liturgy along the lines Pope Benedict has proposed may be the most loving and effective option we have in these ever hotter times.

People will have to keep working very much in the sphere of the secular.  Of course!  Our inward Catholic Christian identity must find outward expression and bring concrete fruits.

But I think the real work now – where we will make some effective headway – must be done at the level of our public worship.

In the present circumstances, we are not going to argue most people out of danger or error.  But together we can draw them in and along and back through worship.

So long as we remain doctrinally faithful and active in works of mercy both spiritual and especially temporal, if we get our public worship together we will have a mightier argument against error. 

Holy Catholic worship will be an attractive force for conversion.

We need to foster worship which stuns, which leaves the newcomer, long-time practicing Catholic, above all the fallen-away simply thunder stuck.  Worship must at some point leave people speechless in awe.  We need language and music and gesture which in its beauty floods the mind with light even while it swells the heart to bursting.

The more people encounter mystery through liturgy, the more hollow will clang the false or incomplete messages of those who have strayed from the good path, either to the left or to the right.  

Our goal must be that which is good and beautiful because it is true, that which reflects what is of God, not man’s image merely.  Give us mystery, not fabrications smacking of the world, fallen and transitory.

Fathers, and you Reverend Bishops, if anything of alarm has sounded in your hearts and minds of late, rethink your approach to our worship.  Examine your approach with an eye on the signs of the times.  Take a new approach

The approach we have had least last few decades isn’t getting it done.  Really … it isn’t

Going neither left nor right along the road toward the Lord, even as He comes to us, take the flock now deeper, now higher on that path, but always to encounter the mystery which distinguishes truly Catholic liturgy… and therefore true Catholics.

Lines are being drawn, sides taken, choices made.

More than ever we need what Christ, the true Actor of our liturgy, desires to offer us through Holy Church’s worship.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Clerical Sexual Abuse, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged ,
21 Comments

Catholic League’s full page ad in the New York Times

The Catholic League has weighed in with a full page ad in the New York Times (aka Hell’s Bible).

The text:

GOING FOR THE VATICAN JUGULAR

Recent accusations against the Vatican deserve a response.

• Fr. Lawrence Murphy apparently began his predatory behavior inWisconsin in the 1950s, yet the victims’ families never contacted the police until the mid-1970s. After an investigation, the case was dropped.

• The Vatican did not learn of the case until 1996.

• Cardinal Ratzinger, now the pope, was the head of the office that was contacted. There is no evidence that he knew of it. But even if he did, he would have had to allow for an investigation. While the inquiry was proceeding, Murphy died.

• The Times questions why Murphy was never defrocked. But only the Vatican can do that, and since it never learned of the case until he was dying, it was never a realistic option.

• The Times says the Vatican’s canonical inquiry was done in secret. Correct. The proceedings of internal investigations—even in organizations like the Times—are never shown on C-SPAN.

• The Times says repeatedly that Church officials did not report accusations of abuse to the police. The common response of all organizations, secular as well as religious, was to access therapy and reinstate the patient (I prefer the term offender). Today it is obvious that a more hard-line approach is necessary, though therapy is still popular in many quarters.

• The Times continues to editorialize about the "pedophilia crisis," when all along it’s been a homosexual crisis. Eighty percent of the victims of priestly sexual abuse are male and most of them are post-pubescent. While homosexuality does not cause predatory behavior, and most gay priests are not molesters, most of the molesters have been gay.

Here’s what’s really going on. The Times has teamed up with Jeffrey Anderson, a radical lawyer who has made millions suing the Church (and greasing professional victims’ groups like SNAP), so they can weaken its moral authority. Why? Because of issues like abortion, gay marriage and women’s ordination. That’s what’s really driving them mad, and that’s why they are on the hunt. Those who doubt this to be true need to ask why the debt-ridden Times does not spend the same resources looking for dirt in other institutions that occurred a half-century ago.

Bill Donohue
President

CATHOLIC LEAGUE for Religious and Civil Rights
450 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10123
(212) 371-3191 Fax: (212) 371-3394
www.catholicleague.org

UPDATE: I like the Curt Jester’s observation via Twitter: The NYT rejected Archbishop Dolan’s response but accepted a paid ad from Catholic League: at the NYT you have to pay for balance.  Kudos to the Jester.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Clerical Sexual Abuse | Tagged ,
17 Comments

In fairness to writers in America Magazine

A couple things:

In America Magazine, Sean Michael Winters, who is wrong about most things, got something right about the ghastly MSM recent coverage clerical sexual abuse of children.  He is a bit late in his examination of the case in California, but he makes some good points…. a few of them new, as well.

Furthermore, Fr. James Martin, SJ, in the America, has a solid offering which must be read – especially reading thisFr. Martin’s piece is called "Celibacy does not cause pedophilia".   And he got something posted in the Huffington Post … which will surely draw thought and balanced reactions in that combox.  I think he underplayed the homosexual factor in the abuse cases, but he made a solid argument.

I bring these to your attention out of fairness.  They got this right.

Posted in Biased Media Coverage, Clerical Sexual Abuse | Tagged , ,
4 Comments

“Pray for the Pope” store – buttons and other stuff

REQUEST: If you have ordered or received some of these buttons or mugs, etc., could you send photos?  Also, send a note if any of these has started or helped a conversation!

___

In light of the attacks on Pope Benedict which are sure to continue in the media, I thought it would be a good idea to pray more frequently for the Holy Father and to help you remind others to do the same.

Here are some trinkets which you might consider in this cause.

With the help of "Vincenzo", the official WDTPRS photoshopper, I made a cafepress store for buttons and the like.

If you are in the USA

Get Pro Pontifice stuff here.

If you are in the UK…

You can get the Pro Pontifice stuff here.

If you are an Aussie …

You can get Pro Pontifice stuff here.

If you are a Canadian …

You can get Pro Pontifice stuff here.

There are also mugs and a hat and some shirts and the like.

There are as well packs of 100 buttons in different sizes which you could distribute to people.

From the the Enchiridion of Indulgences, #25:

A partial indulgence is granted to the Christian faithful who, in a spirit of filial devotion, devoutly recite any duly approved prayer for the Supreme Pontiff (e.g., the Oremus pro Pontifice):

V. Let us pray for our Pontiff, Pope Benedict.

R. May the Lord preserve him, and give him life, and bless him upon earth, and deliver him not to the will of his enemies.

Our Father.  Hail Mary.

Let us pray.

O God, Shepherd and Ruler of all Thy faithful people, look mercifully upon Thy servant Benedict, whom Thou hast chosen as shepherd to preside over Thy Church. Grant him, we beseech Thee, that by his word and example, he may edify those over whom he hath charge, so that together with the flock committed to him, may he attain everlasting life. Through Christ our Lord. Amen.

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk6M0B5A2Qk]

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Pope of Christian Unity, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged ,
8 Comments

QUAERITUR: teenage girl dancers during Easter vigil

From a reader:

I am from Puerto Rico and I want to consult to you something that bothered me a lot on my Parish’s Paschal Virgil. I belong to the San José Parish in Caguas, Puerto Rico; it is a Discalced Carmelite Parish. Forgive me if my English is not very good, my main language is Spanish.
 
After the Gloria, about ten teen aged girls came by the doors of the temple and shouted to each other: "He has risen! Did you hear, X?" After that, they all came to the center of the temple and started dancing to a song of an Hispanic Christian group called Tercer Cielo ‘Creeré’ (this group is not catholic nor the song was not about the Resurrection, but about how to trust God to help you in Victory.) At the end of the song, a teen-aged boy came as Jesus and paraded by the Temple as he was "resurrected".
 
Most of the people in the parish started clapping; I was with my 3 children and thought that it was an irreverence to our Church to do so, so I didn’t.
 
The deacons of our Parish helped stage the dance and they are not easy to correct, less alone without a document of the Church to use as reference. Also, until I would like to take this before our Parish Priest, but with documentation.
 
I have looked on the internet (including vatican.va) and I have not find any official document about this theme. Can you kindly guide me towards where should I look? Should I shut up about this?

I would appreciate if you can help me with this issue.

Okay… I’m pretty tired so I am going to ask some folks to offer some responses to you, through me by e-mail, from which I can select to post.  Put the title of this post in the SUBJECT for the e-mail.

But my first reaction is: How long Oh Lord will we endure this abuse?

I would ask any of those people who organized that adolescent romp to show where in the Roman Missal those things are called for.

Get photos and videos… I am sure there are some… and send them to the Congregation for Divine Worship.  Don’t worry: the Prefect’s Spanish is pretty good.  He’ll grasp the essentials if he can see photos and a video.

 

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
3 Comments