QUAERITUR: leaving the “and” out of the form for absolution

From a reader:Buy WDTPRS stuff!

Forgive the scrupulosity of the question:  At my most recent confession, the priest, who I confess to with some regularity on and off, absolved as follows – while making the sign of the cross:  I absolve you from your sins in the Name of the Father, Son, Holy Spirit. 
 
While that seems substantially correct, are the words "and the" necessary for validity?  i.e.  the Father AND THE Son AND THE Holy Spirit?  Was it a valid absolution?  I presumed, with some doubt, that it was valid at that time.
 
If it was not valid, do any serious sins confessed therein have to be re-confessed in a subsequent confession?

I believe that absolution was valid.

This is another example of why priests should SAY THE BLACK and DO THE RED.

People should never have to doubt that they were validly absolved, even for a moment.

If you confess regularly to a priest who regularly does something a little dodgy with the form of absolution, I would politely bring it up, and that it has been a point of concern for you.  I think people are within their rights to have the form of absolution spoken as it is in the book.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
29 Comments

Bp. Jenky (D. Peoria): tabernacle must be in center of all churches in five years

I thought you would like to know about a positive development in the Diocese of Peoria.

My emphases and comments:

 

Directive on location of tabernacles from Bishop Jenky

Saying that placing the Blessed Sacrament at the physical center of the church puts Christ at the center of our spiritual lives as well, Bishop Daniel R. Jenky, CSC, is asking that the tabernacle be located “in the direct center at the back of the sanctuary” in all churches and chapels in the Diocese of Peoria.

The bishop’s letter was issued on Holy Thursday, the day when Catholics around the world gather for the Mass of the Lord’s Supper and celebrate the institution of the Eucharist.

"A gift in the bishop’s letter is that he is giving people five years,” said Msgr. Stanley Deptula, director of the diocesan Office of Divine Worship. “Some of those parishes, for architectural, financial and catechetical reasons, will need to take some time to revisit the Eucharist. . . . They have five years to pray over this moment of renewal.”  [I would give them a year.]

Following is the full text of Bishop Jenky’s directive:

——

April 1, 2010
+Holy Thursday

Dear Priests, Deacons, Religious and Faithful of the Diocese of Peoria,

The Mass, of course, is our most important act of worship [More and more I am preferring to speak and write of "worship" rather than "liturgy".] — the very source and summit of all we do as a Church. A profound reverence for the Reserved Sacrament is also intrinsically related to the Eucharistic liturgy.

The Reserved Sacrament must therefore be treated with the greatest possible respect, because at all times the Blessed Sacrament within that tabernacle, as in the Eucharistic Liturgy, is to be given that worship called latria, which is the adoration given to Almighty God. This intentional honor is incomparably greater than the reverence we give to sacramentals, sacred images, the Baptistry, the Holy Oils, or the Paschal Candle. [Hey liberal liturgists! Pay attention!] The Sacrament is reserved not only so that the Eucharist can be brought to the dying and to those unable to attend Mass, but also as the heart and locus of a parish’s prayer and devotion. [D’ya ‘spose Richard McBrien will drop a line to Bp. Jenky about how backward it is to adore the Blessed Sacrament?]

There is a kind of bundle of rituals in our Catholic tradition with which we surround the Tabernacle. As we enter or leave the church, we bless ourselves with holy water, we genuflect towards the Tabernacle, [And if at that moment, then why not reception of Communion?] we prepare for Mass or give thanks after Mass, consciously in the presence of the Most Blessed Sacrament. At prayers and devotions, during the Liturgy of the Hours, in any private prayer which takes place in a Catholic Church, we truly pray before the Risen Christ substantially and really present in the Sacrament reserved in the Tabernacle.

These core Catholic convictions and their architectural ramifications have recently been reaffirmed by many Bishops in the United States. As bishop of this Diocese, I am also convinced that where we place the Tabernacle — and how we ritually reverence the Reserved Sacrament — is as important for the continuing Eucharistic catechesis as is all our preaching and teaching. With Jesus truly present in the Blessed Sacrament at the physical center of our places of worship, how can He not also more firmly become the center of our spiritual lives as well?

After consultation with my Presbyteral Council, I am therefore asking that those few parish churches and chapels where the tabernacle is not in the direct center at the back of the sanctuary, that these spaces be redesigned in such a way that the Reserved Sacrament would be placed at the center. In some cases, this change can be easily achieved, but given financial and design restraints, plans for redesign may be submitted to the Office of Divine Worship at any time during the next five years. Monastic communities whose chapels are open to the faithful as semi-public oratories may also request a dispensation from this general regulation according to the norms of their particular liturgical tradition. There may also be some very tiny chapels where a change could be impossible. These requests should be submitted in writing to my office.

I would also like to remind everyone in our Diocese that at Mass, in accord with the General Instruction of the Roman Missal, the Tabernacle should only be reverenced at the beginning and end of the liturgy or when the Sacrament is being taken from or returned to the Tabernacle. At all other moments and movements in the liturgy it is the Altar of Sacrifice that is to be reverenced.  [I don’t especially like that.  It is wrong-headed, in my opinion. But it is, sadly, the law.]

It is my conviction that Eucharistic Liturgy and Eucharistic devotion are never in competition but rather inform and strengthen our shared worship and reverence. May all in our Diocese grow in greater love and appreciation of the gift of the Eucharist.

Sincerely yours in Christ,

Most Reverend Daniel R. Jenky, C.S.C.
BISHOP OF PEORIA 

WDTPRS Kudos to Bp. Jenky.

Posted in Brick by Brick |
47 Comments

President Obama’s personal “domestic security force”

Someone sent me a link to second Youtube video.

But first watch this one:

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IM-JiGGYJ5w&feature=player_embedded

Posted in Global Killer Asteroid Questions | Tagged
31 Comments

“…not pastoral care of the faithful, but the psychological distress of the priest.”

I am working my way piece meal through a borrowed copy of Lazlo Dobszay’s The Restoration and Organic Development of the Roman Rite.

Here is a blurb:

"The turning around of the altars, celebration versus populum, was not commanded by the Council.  In practice, however, the new rite and the new position of the altar are closely associated.  We may say that changing back to the the original direction will have a beneficial effect.  Indeed the very fact that the bulk of the clergy protests with intense emotions against this return shows its serious necessity; the principle motivation behind the protest is not pastoral care of the faithful, but the psychological distress of the priest.  (p. 93)

 

Posted in Brick by Brick | Tagged
26 Comments

Rabbi Bemporad: media coverage of Church abuse scandal one-dimensional

From CNA:

Rabbi calls media coverage of Church abuse scandal one-dimensional

Carlstadt, N.J., Apr 7, 2010 / 03:05 am (CNA).- In an interview with CNA on Tuesday, Rabbi Jack Bemporad commented on the recent media onslaught concerning the Holy Father, calling the coverage “one dimensional” and saying that the depiction of the Church in the media has not been given “proper context.”

Rabbi Bemporad, director of the New Jersey-based Center for Interreligious Understanding, was recently quoted [wait for it] as a lone voice in an Associated Press article in which other Jewish leaders denounced the papal preacher, Fr. Raniero Cantalamessa, for his comments likening the media depiction of the Church to anti-Semitism.

In the AP article released on April 2, and in a follow up interview with CNA, Rabbi Bemporad defended the papal preacher. Although the rabbi believes Fr. Cantalamessa used a “poor example,” ultimately, the preacher’s “point is correct.

What the preacher intended to indicate through his homily, Rabbi Bemporad said, was that “you can’t collectively condemn the church for what some priests and some individuals in the Church may have done.”

Addressing those who have criticized Pope Benedict in recent days, Rabbi Bemporad stated that “you’ve got to have a sense of compassion, charity, and saying ‘how can we help you do this properly?’ Instead of condemning him and saying, ‘See, you’re not doing enough.’”

We’re so quick to judge, we’re so quick to condemn,” he stressed. “There’s no charity, there’s no compassion, no sympathy, and no, by the way, self-criticism.”

A lot of sex abuse involving children is going on, the rabbi noted. “It’s not simply a Catholic problem.” [And, I think we must add, there is not a lot going in the Church now!]

“I do think that the pope is trying to do the best he can,” he added.

The rabbi also took a jab at the media coverage of the Pope, calling it “very one dimensional” and charging that many of the reports have not placed Vatican actions “in the proper context.”

“The tragedy of the media,” Rabbi Bemporad stated, “is that it has a capacity to educate, instead what it does is cater to the worst element in human beings. The most voyeuristic element.”

We shouldn’t be so quick to grab at headlines which are virulent, and in my opinion, hysterical,” he asserted.

The New Jersey rabbi also praised Pope Benedict for his efforts in helping advance the relationship between the two faiths, saying the pontiff has “tried to be a friend” and has done whatever he can “to show the close relationship between Catholics and Jews.”

“All I am asking for is charity,” and “that we should think about how we can help one another not condemn one another,” said the rabbi.

Posted in The Drill |
5 Comments

Oremus pro Pontifice button

A friend here in NYC gave me one of the "Oremus pro Pontifice" small buttons!

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged
8 Comments

WDTPRS POLL: Card. George gives award to Fr. Pfleger

Sooo… Cardinal George of Chicago is going to give an award to Fr. Pfleger.

"But Father! But Father!", you might be saying.  "What for?"

For:

service in pursuit of dismantling racism, injustice and inequalities on behalf of African Americans and all people of color.

Hmmmm….

{democracy:52}

Explain your anonymous vote in the combox.

PLEASE keep the flames to yourself.  Just cogent, balanced comments, please.

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", POLLS | Tagged , ,
93 Comments

Record number of confirmations in one US diocese

I enjoyed this story from CNA:

Record number confirmed in Baltimore, despite recent media attacks on Church

Baltimore, Md., Apr 6, 2010 / 07:02 am (CNA).- Despite the recent media attacks on the Church and Holy Father regarding clergy sex abuse scandals, one U.S. archdiocese set a record for confirming the most individuals in its history to the Catholic faith.

On Saturday, the Archdiocese of Baltimore confirmed a record 1,090 adults to the faith at the Easter Vigil Mass in parishes throughout the area, breaking the archdiocesan record for a second year in a row,  reported the Baltimore Sun on April 4.

“We’re on a roll, I guess,” said Archbishop Edwin O’Brien to the Baltimore Sun. Although the bishop said he would like to credit the archdiocesan staff for the record numbers, “the rubber hits the road in the parishes,” he explained. “It’s there where we find the real life of the Church.”

Local parishioner Rich Foster, 59, told the Baltimore Sun that the recently surfaced sex abuse scandals within the Church in the U.S. and Europe and the subsequent media attack on the Holy Father did not affect his decision to become Catholic.

“It reflects the frailties of all of us humans,” Foster said on Sunday. “We all have sinned … Part of what the church teaches us is reconciliation, redemption, and forgiveness.” An attendee of New All Saints Church in Baltimore, Foster described his church as “a congregation that I see doing wonderful work in terms of giving back to the community, being open and welcoming to both church members and the outside community.”

“I think that outweighs to me any concerns that may arise in this current controversy,” he added. “I trust my church will go forward in a righteous manner, dealing with these issues directly.”

The record 1,090 individuals confirmed on Saturday surpasses the 984 confirmed in 2009. According to Sharon Bogusz, coordinator of evangelization and adult catechesis for the Baltimore Archdiocese, approximately one quarter of those confirmed were the newly baptized. Others were baptized Catholic as infants but did not receive further sacraments and the majority of those confirmed were from others Christian backgrounds whose baptisms the Church recognizes.

“It’s wonderful,” Bogusz told the Baltimore Sun, “our parishes are really doing a lot of hard work and sharing news and welcome.”

 

I am very pleased about this good news.   At the same time, I think I would like to chat with some of those newly confirmed to find out what they know about their faith.   Still, this is a very good thing.  I hope it is the beginning of a trend.

Posted in Brick by Brick | Tagged
29 Comments

ALERT: Successor in Los Angeles!

In the brick by brick file….

From VIS.

From CNA:

Archbishop Gomez appointed to Archdiocese of LA

Vatican City, Apr 6, 2010 / 05:53 am (CNA/EWTN News).- This morning the Holy Father appointed current San Antonio Archbishop Jose H. Gomez as Coadjutor Archbishop of Los Angeles, California, the largest diocese in the United States. The prelate will serve alongside current Cardinal Roger Mahoney, and will take over his position when he retires.

Archbishop Gomez was born in 1951 in Monterrey, Mexico to Dr. José H. Gomez and Esperanza Velasco, both who are now deceased.

The prelate earned bachelor’s degrees in accounting, philosophy and theology and was ordained an Opus Dei priest in 1978. In 1980, he obtained a doctorate in theology from the University of Navarre’s Pamplona, Spain campus.

From 1987 to 1999, then-Father Gomez was in residence at Our Lady of Grace Catholic Church in San Antonio where he assisted with the parish’s pastoral work. It was during this time that he became a regional representative to the National Association of Hispanic Priests (ANSH). In 1995 he was named president, then took on the role of executive director in 1999.

Archbishop Gomez played a central role in establishing the Hispanic Seminary of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico City which opened in 2000.

Then in 2001, he was ordained an auxiliary bishop for the Archdiocese of Denver, where he served in several areas, including outreach to the Hispanic community. He also organized the establishment of Denver’s Centro San Juan Diego for Family and Pastoral Care, a place for formation of lay leaders and a base to provide welcoming services to immigrants.

In 2005, the year he was appointed Archbishop of San Antonio, he was named one of Time Magazine’s 25 most influential Hispanics in the United States, and in 2007 he was on a CNN’s list of “Notable Hispanics” in a web special celebrating “Hispanic Heritage Month.”

While the Archbishop of San Antonio, Most Rev. Gomez created the The Catholic Community Foundation for the Roman Catholic Church of the archdiocese and was key in bringing together Hispanic leaders for the Catholic Association of Latino Leaders (CALL).

Archbishop Gomez was also appointed in 2008 as a consultant to the Pontifical Commission for Latin America. He also serves in various roles for the United States Catholic Conference of Bishops including: chair of the task force on the Spanish Language Bible for the Church in America, chair of the Committee on Cultural Diversity in the Church, member of the Committee on Doctrine, and member of the Subcommittee on Hispanics and the Liturgy.

According to the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, in his new role, Archbishop Gomez will lead 4,329,267 Catholics (as of 2005), 530 diocesan priests, 640 religious priests, and 1,710 religious sisters.

The news coincides with things I have heard for a few months.

I picked up the image, above, at Sancte Pater.

I am pretty sure that this is not a "win" for Card. Mahony.

Posted in Brick by Brick | Tagged , ,
112 Comments

QUAERITUR: “low” Mass of the bishop in the Ordinary Form

From a reader:

I recently had the opportunity to dine at my [bishop]’s Residence and we were invited into his private chapel after dinner to offer a prayer. A friend of mine and I then wondered if he celebrated Mass every day he is present at that small chapel — his secretary and another priest in addition to a few nuns who manage the house live there, but not one else to my knowledge.

This led us to wondering whether it was permissible for a bishop to celebrate Mass without the miter, crozier, or other trappings of the episcopal state. Would you be able to offer us any insight into this? Of course, the bishop considers it an honor and privilege to offer Mass, but one wonders whether or not, in his busy schedule, he is able to offer it in his private chapel without the liturgical accoutrements of a bishop.

 

I think in the Novus Ordo, the Ordinary Form, pretty much anything goes.

In the Extraordinary Form, the Low Mass of the diocesan bishop was somewhat more elaborate than that of a priest.  From what I can figure out, there was an ecclesiological point involved: when the bishop said Mass, the whole diocese was in a sense morally present.  As a result, the bishop didn’t celebrate Mass in the same way as a priest.

As far as the newer form of Mass is concerned.  I don’t know that there is anything to mention of interest other than the obligation to remove the zucchetto at the offertory.  They greet and bless in their own manner, as well as have a slight adjustment to the Eucharistic prayer when praying for various people.

Perhaps some readers can chime in if they have any experience.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes |
14 Comments