Card. Kasper on the Pope of Christian Unity

I have been saying, and others are now saying, that Benedict XVI is the "Pope of Christian Unity".

I received a note from a friend that the German page of Vatican Radio has an interview with Walter Card. Kasper, President of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, in which he says:

"Ich kenne gar keinen anderen Kirchenführer, der so oft, so eindringlich und so klar über die Ökumene spricht und sich zur Ökumene bekennt. … I know of no other Church leader who speaks so often, so forcefully and so clearly about ecumenism and is committed to ecumenism."

 

 

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged
1 Comment

HAARETZ: Editorial in defense of Ven. Pius XII

I saw this on the site of HAARETZ.

My emphases and comments.

22 Jan 2010

Much-maligned pontiff

 By Dimitri Cavalli 
 
Some things never go away. The controversy over Pope Pius XII’s actions during World War II was recently reignited when Pope Benedict XVI signed a decree affirming that his predecessor displayed "heroic virtues" during his lifetime. When the pope visited the Great Synagogue of Rome on Sunday, Riccardo Pacifici, president of Rome’s Jewish community, told him: "The silence of Pius XII before the Shoah still hurts because something should have been done."

This was not the first time the wartime pope, who is now a step closer to beatification, has been accused of keeping silent during the Holocaust, of doing little or nothing to help the Jews, and even of collaborating with the Nazis. To what extent, if any, does the evidence back up these allegations, which have been repeated since the early 1960s?

On April 4, 1933, Eugenio Cardinal Pacelli, the Vatican secretary of state, instructed the papal nuncio in Germany to see what he could do to oppose the Nazis’ anti-Semitic policies.
   
On behalf of Pope Pius XI, Cardinal Pacelli drafted an encyclical, entitled "Mit brennender Sorge" ("With Burning Anxiety"), that condemned Nazi doctrines and persecution of the Catholic Church. The encyclical was smuggled into Germany and read from Catholic pulpits on March 21, 1937.

Although many Vatican critics today dismiss the encyclical as a light slap on the wrist, the Germans saw it as a security threat. For example, on March 26, 1937, Hans Dieckhoff, an official in the German foreign ministry, wrote that the "encyclical contains attacks of the severest nature upon the German government, calls upon Catholic citizens to rebel against the authority of the state, and therefore signifies an attempt to endanger internal peace."

Both Great Britain and France [Perhaps more questions should be asked about this rather than the absurd claim that Pius XII didn’t do enough.] should have interpreted the document as a warning that they should not trust Adolf Hitler or try to appease him.

After the death of Pius XI, Cardinal Pacelli was elected pope, on March 2, 1939. The Nazis were displeased with the new pontiff, who took the name Pius XII. On March 4, Joseph Goebbels, the German propaganda minister, wrote in his diary: "Midday with the Fuehrer. He is considering whether we should abrogate the concordat with Rome in light of Pacelli’s election as pope."

During the war, the pope was far from silent: In numerous speeches and encyclicals, he championed human rights for all people and called on the belligerent nations to respect the rights of all civilians and prisoners of war. Unlike many of the pope’s latter-day detractors, the Nazis understood him very well. [Exactly.] After studying Pius XII’s 1942 Christmas message, the Reich Central Security Office concluded: "In a manner never known before the pope has repudiated the National Socialist New European Order … Here he is virtually accusing the German people of injustice toward the Jews and makes himself the mouthpiece of the Jewish war criminals." (Pick up any book that criticizes Pius XII, and you won’t find any mention of this important report.)  [Right!]

In early 1940, the pope acted as an intermediary between a group of German generals who wanted to overthrow Hitler and the British government. Although the conspiracy never went forward, Pius XII kept in close contact with the German resistance and heard about two other plots against Hitler. In the fall of 1941, through diplomatic channels, the pope agreed with Franklin Delano Roosevelt that America’s Catholics could support the president’s plans to extend military aid to the Soviet Union after it was invaded by the Nazis. On behalf of the Vatican, John T. McNicholas, the archbishop of Cincinnati, Ohio, delivered a well-publicized address that explained that the extension of assistance to the Soviets could be morally justified because it helped the Russian people, who were the innocent victims of German aggression.

Throughout the war, the pope’s deputies frequently ordered the Vatican’s diplomatic representatives in many Nazi-occupied and Axis countries to intervene on behalf of endangered Jews. Up until Pius XII’s death in 1958, many Jewish organizations, newspapers and leaders lauded his efforts. To cite one of many examples, in his April 7, 1944, letter to the papal nuncio in Romania, Alexander Shafran, chief rabbi of Bucharest, wrote: "It is not easy for us to find the right words to express the warmth and consolation we experienced because of the concern of the supreme pontiff, who offered a large sum to relieve the sufferings of deported Jews … The Jews of Romania will never forget these facts of historic importance."

The campaign against Pope Pius XII is doomed to failure because his detractors cannot sustain their main charges against him – that he was silent, pro-Nazi, and did little or nothing to help the Jews – with evidence. Perhaps only in a backward world such as ours would the one man who did more than any other wartime leader to help Jews and other Nazi victims, receive the greatest condemnation.

Dimitri Cavalli is an editor and writer in New York City. He is working on books on both Pope Pius XII and Joe McCarthy, the late manager of the New York Yankees.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged ,
2 Comments

QUAERITUR: plain unfermented grape juice in chalice for Mass

UPDATE 22 Jan 1553 GMT:

I received this from the original questioner:

Thanks for the tip, Father.

Between you and me, we ordered the mustum, put it in the sacristy fridge, and Father used it without saying a single word.

Back to validity again, Deo gratias. 

____

ORIGINAL POST

From a reader:

What is the status of a Mass at which grape juice is used in the chalice?

Not mustum, not wine resembling anything close to the definition thereof,  only pure, 100% Walgreen’s brand grape juice mixed with a drop or two of water.

Does this fall under the category of one element being consecrated without the other (i.e., the bread), or is the entire Mass invalid?

No other wine is consecrated, e.g., for communion of the people under both species.

We have a real, ongoing problem here with this.

So far, only the sacristan and I are aware…

Oh dear.

Grape juice which has not undergone any fermentation at all, which is not thus at least mustum, is not valid matter for the sacrifice of the Mass. 

For there to be a valid consecration you must use juice of the grape which, without additives, has undergone some fermentation (even if halted at a very early stage by, for example, freezing, thus called "mustum" – even with less than 1.0% alcohol in some cases, or – normally – having undergone more fermentation to become "vinum"). 

If you have expressed your concerns to the priest and get nowhere with him, then you must contact the local bishop IMMEDIATELY and explain what is taking place. 

If that doesn’t produce results or any satisfactory explanation you need to contact Rome.  Write to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which has competence in matters of concrete instances of validity of sacraments.  The same CDF also was the dicastery which issued the directives about the use of low-gluten hosts and mustum.

Remember: Some sort of proof needs to be supplied, so keep copies of what you very respectfully wrote to the priest and/or bishop and what they responded.

 


Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
28 Comments

Agnes… lambs… Popes…. nuns… pallia

The Holy Father blessed lambs today, the feast of St. Agnes, as usual.

The lambs are associated with Agnes, because of the Latin similarity of their names, Agnes and agnus.  Get it?

Those sisters in the background are Benedictine nuns from the convent at St. Cecilia in Trastevere.  When I first lived in Rome, I would go there everyday, into the cloister, and serve Mass for the rector of the basilica.  I got to know them a bit.

In the morning the rather heavily drugged lambs are, tied down on a small litter, decorated with flowers, and brought to the Basilica of St. Agnes out on the Via Nomentana, where Mass is said.  You are thereby entertained by their bleating…. better than the Sistine Choir, actually.

Now that I think of it….it’s a good thing they don’t mix that agnus thing up with angus. That would make the litter harder to carry!  (Where is Vincenzo when you need him?)

Then they are taken to the Pope.

Then they are taken to St. Cecilia’s.

Later they will be shorn and, traditionally, their wool is used for the pallia distributed to new archbishops on the feast of Sts. Peter and Paul.  Of course there are so many archbishops these days that they would need a whole flock of lambs.

Then they are taken out to a beautiful farm, Timmy, where they can play with other lambs.

Well… honestly… I am not sure about the fate of the lambs. 

But I do know that Romans are neither overly sentimental about critters nor are they sparing in their appreciation of abbacchio scottaditto.

"But Father! But Father!", the fluffly lamb-lovers will blurt, as they recoil in horror from the screen.  "Would you… would you….?!?  You’re baaaaahd!"

I would.  When I see lambs, I think "Supper and sweater."

And for the record, in June the new archbishops get the better design of the pallium.   Just in case the Pope was going to ask.

Posted in "But Father! But Father!" | Tagged ,
17 Comments

QUAERITUR: Do you want all English Masses eliminated?

From a reader (emphasis in the original):

Do you want all English Masses eliminated, or a weekly Latin Mass at each parish, or what?  Our priest has said that everything that has happened in the last forty years has been  bad.  He has a Latin Mass in the chapel about every two months.  I assume he would have more, or say them in the main church,  if there was a request from enough people.

 

Do I want all English Masses eliminated?

Where is Mass celebrated in English?

Ask me again when Masses can be said in an English that both translates the original and doesn’t offend the intellect.

If people want Holy Mass in the Novus Ordo in the Latin language (the actual language of our Latin Church), I suggest they start asking for it.

If people want Holy Mass in the traditional, Extraordinary Form, I suggest they ask for it.

Don’t grouse if you have done nothing.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
42 Comments

QUAERITUR: Pre-Conciliar Masses for the deaf

From a reader:

I have often wondered if there was any specially approved liturgy for profoundly/ severely  deaf people prior to the liturgical reforms of the ’60s? Surely, there must have been some adaptations of the Tridentine Mass to accomadate their needs? For instance, a Tridentine facing the people, or even it being said in sign langauge or something?

 

I have absolutely no idea.   We will need the help of others on this.

My first impulse is to say that there were no special provisions.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
27 Comments

SSPX Bp. Williamson’s interview Pierre Danet, extreme right French politician

The wonderful and persistent Anna Arco of The Catholic Herald has on her blog an interesting piece about SSPX Bishop Williamson.


Dinoscopus sleeps, eats and blogs: Williamson Redux

After months of sensible silence in the genteel exile of Wimbledon, Bishop Richard Williamson, the Lefebvrist bishop whose Holocaust denial caused a media ruckuss and an endless headache for Pope Benedict last year has given an interview to a minor French politician of the extreme right, Pierre Danet. The French Catholic newspaper La Croix first posted the interview today.

It was published on Daily Motion on Tuesday, only days after Pope Benedict XVI visited the Great Synagogue in Rome. There is already comment on it here The interviewer, Pierre Danet was a candidate for the European elections on the anti-zionist ticket of the right-wing French comic and political activist Dieudonne M’bala M’bala.

Bishop Williamson said that he believed that the dialogue between Rome and the Society of St Pius X, working towards reconciliation, was a dialogue of deaf people. He also said that he was sleeping, eating and blogging in his “unexpected sabbatical year”. His blog Dinoscopus (a cross of Dinosaur and Episcopus) was public until last year’s bruhaha over Bishop Williamson’s Holocaust denial broke. In the interview he gives his oppinion on the State of Israel, Muslim Christian relations, Kant (a criminal), and some basic theology. He also discloses to the interviewer that he loves Beethoven.

You’ll want to head over to Anna Arco’s Diary for video and a transcript. 

The interview is odd.   But here is a taste:

Panet: And what do you know of the latest between the negotiations between the Fraternity [Society of St Pius X] and the Vatican?

Williamson: I think it will finish by becoming a dialogue of the deaf, because of two things. One: The two positions in themselves are irreconcilable. For example 2+2=4 and 2+2=5 it’s irreconcilable. Therefore of three things, one: either they say 2+2=4 , enounce reality and say 2+2=5 –that is to say the Fraternity would abandon the truth that God forbids us to do or that those who say that 2+2=5 convert and return to the truth or the two come half-way, that means everyone decides that 2+2=4 ½ . It’s wrong. Therefore, either the Fraternity betrays itself or Rome converts, or it is a dialogue of the deaf.
Posted in Ecclesiae unitatem | Tagged
43 Comments

Planned Parenthood’s abortion industrialists capitalizing on Haiti’s suffering

This should make you angry.

From Lifesite.

International Planned Parenthood Capitalizing on Haiti Earthquake with New Fundraiser

By Patrick B. Craine

PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti, January 19, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Capitalizing on the compassion of developed nations towards Haiti following the disastrous 7.0 scale earthquake last Tuesday, the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) has launched a fundraising appeal in order to further their aims in the devastated pro-life nation.

Within a day of the disaster, IPPF had sent out an appeal letter, seeking “urgent” support for their Haitian affiliate PROFAMIL.

IPPF, the world’s largest abortion provider, claims that funds are needed in order to restore “basic medical services” at the PROFAMIL clinics.  According to their letter, PROFAMIL has operated since 1984, providing “low-cost, quality sexual and reproductive healthcare.”

Read more at Lifesite.

Remember that Planned Parenthood evolved from the intent of eugenicists such as Margaret Sanger of ridding the earth of black people and other undesirables.  They target the poor for a reason: they want to eliminate the ills of the world by eliminating them.

 

 

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

QUAERITUR: Papal blessing at 1st Masses of newly ordained

 

From a seminarian:

I understand that in a rescript issued from the Holy See, on November 5, 1964, Paul VI granted the newly-ordained priest the privilege of offering a papal blessing on the occasion of his first Masses.

Is this still in force?

Can such a blessing still be granted at first Masses?

 

Good question. 

I am not sure.

My first impulse is to say that this probably shouldn’t be done because of the changes made to indulgences found in the Enchiridion Indulgentiarum.  The new norms replace the old norms and privileges.  In the new Enchiridion people who participate in a first Mass of a new priest can receive a plenary indulgence… which was the point of the old papal blessing.  

Yes, this is a lot more vague and far less interesting, but it is on the books now.

Perhaps someone else has found a clarification on this and can share it.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
12 Comments

Catholics and CINO politicians

In the wake of the stunning defeat of a dem in the Massachusetts election, there is a hard-hitting entry on SERVIAM today.

What Can Brown Do For You? Scratch Another Pro Abortion CINO!

The victory by Scott Brown in Massachusetts tonight is a victory for Catholics.  Brown, a protestant, defeated Martha Coakley, the Massachusetts Pro Abortion ["Catholic"] Attorney General.  Coakley, like Nancy Pelosi and the late Ted Kennedy whose Senate seat they were fighting for, likes to call herself Catholic.  She is anything but.  CINO candidates like this must be defeated.

And while it would be nice to say (and maybe someday we will be able to) that the race swung because a couple of million Massachusetts Catholics said no to abortion and no to CINOs, [clearly not the case] this race swung on other political issues (although she did opine that maybe Catholics should not work in emergency rooms that might be called upon to provide abortion services. How considerate.)

This all leads me to an excellent post appearing tonight from Adore te Devote on the very subject of pro-abortion politicians who call themselves Catholic.

I don’t care who you are!  If you willfully and publicly dissent against and advance teachings that contradict the Faith and Morals of the Catholic Church, you have separated yourself from us all,  and therefore you may be “Catholic” in name and by baptism (for by virtue of this, there is always hope…I’m a sinner, too, and screw up a LOT), but you LOSE the right to proclaim in conjunction with a public life and advancement in the eyes of others, a Faith you obstinately REFUSE,  ESPECIALLY if  you’re using it for your political advancement to purposefully fleece those who are even more uncatechized than you!

Read the whole post here and send to your local CINO politicians and friends.

Real practicing Catholics must be active in the public square… and the digital continent.  When we find someone distorting our identity, we must make it clear that they are not with us.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
8 Comments