Pope Benedict and ecumenical dialogue with the Orthodox

Pope Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.

He is the Pope of Christian Unity because he is the Pope of Continuity.

Liberals will always try to define the parameters of ecumenical dialogue and will inevitably introduce compromises in essential points of Catholic doctrine and identity for the sake of continuing dialogue. 

Benedict XVI doesn’t do that.  He has shown how we can move on issues that are not of essence while representing those that are in new terms without undermining them.

I read this on chiesa of Sandro Magister.  You should go over there and read the whole text.

My emphases and comments.

ROME, January 25, 2010 – This evening, with vespers in the basilica of Saint Paul’s Outside the Walls, Benedict XVI is closing the week of prayer for Christian unity.

There are some who say that ecumenism has entered a phase of retreat and chill. [And you know who they are.  These are the same folks who gripe about dialogue with the obviously Catholic (though without manifest unity) SSPX but who happily move in the ethos of the LCWR.  They carp about the Holy See’s offer to traditionally minded Anglicans, while seeming to smile on the very aberrations which are tearing the Anglican communion apart.]  But as soon as one that looks to the East, the facts say the opposite. Relations with the Orthodox Churches have never been so promising as they have since Joseph Ratzinger has been pope. [Benedict XVI is the Pope of Christian Unity.]

The dates speak for themselves. A period of chill in the theological dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Churches of Byzantine tradition began in 1990, when the two sides clashed over so-called "uniatism," meaning the ways in which Catholic communities of the Eastern rites duplicate in everything the parallel Orthodox communities, differing only by their obedience to the Church of Rome.

In Balamond, in Lebanon, the dialogue came to a halt. It hit an even bigger obstacle on the Russian side, where the patriarchate of Moscow could not tolerate seeing itself "invaded" by Catholic missionaries sent there by Pope John Paul II, who were all the more suspect because they were of Polish nationality, historically a rival.

The dialogue remained frozen until, in 2005, the German Joseph Ratzinger ascended to the throne of Peter, a pope highly appreciated in the East for the same reason he prompts criticisms in the West: for his attachment to the great Tradition.   [He is the Pope of Christian Unity because he is the Pope of Continuity.]

First in Belgrade in 2006, and then in Ravenna in 2007, the international mixed commission for theological dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Churches started meeting again.

And what rose to the top of the discussion was precisely the question that most divides East and West: the primacy of the successor of Peter in the universal Church.

From the session in Ravenna emerged the document that marked the shift, dedicated to "conciliarity and authority" in the ecclesial communion.

The document of Ravenna, approved unanimously by both sides, affirms that "primacy and conciliarity are mutually interdependent." And in paragraph 41, it highlights the points of agreement and disagreement[NB…]

"Both sides agree that . . . that Rome, as the Church that ‘presides in love’ according to the phrase of St Ignatius of Antioch, occupied the first place in the taxis, and that the bishop of Rome was therefore the protos among the patriarchs. They disagree, however, on the interpretation of the historical evidence from this era regarding the prerogatives of the bishop of Rome as protos, a matter that was already understood in different ways in the first millennium."

"Protos" is the Greek word that means "first." And "taxis" is the structure of the universal Church.

Since then, the discussion on controversial points has advanced at an accelerated pace. And it has started to examine, above all, how the Churches of East and West interpreted the role of the bishop of Rome during the first millennium, when they were still united.

The basis of the discussion is a text that was drafted on the island of Crete at the beginning of autumn in 2008.

The text has never been made public before now. It is in English, and can be read in its entirety on this page of www.chiesa:

> The Role of the Bishop of Rome in the Communion of the Church in the First Millennium

 

This should be interesting.

Posted in Pope of Christian Unity |
8 Comments

D. Phoenix raises the bar on time and extent of marriage preparation

People have a natural right to marry.  Despite that, I have from time to time heard smart people, including priests, opine that while perhaps it ought to be relatively easy to get a divorce, it should be really hard to get married.  That seems to set the issue on its head, but perhaps there is some useful point in framing it that way.

I read this on azcentral.com from Phoenix, AZ.

My emphases and comments.

Phoenix Diocese pushes to make stronger marriage bonds
Rules on training, prep time may lead to fewer weddings

by Michael Clancy – Jan. 25, 2010 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic

With the definition of marriage being challenged nationwide, the Catholic Church in Phoenix has introduced significant changes in its program for couples who want a church wedding, lengthening the preparation time from six to nine months.

Partly in response to efforts promoting gay marriage and a growing trend of unwed couples living together, Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted of Phoenix has decided to intensify the church’s teaching for people planning a Catholic marriage. The new rules for pre-marriage preparation include more time and deeper education. [First thought: Some would think that in the face of challenges from the outside (perverted unions and casual to unblessed unions) the Church would try to make it easier to be married rather than more difficult.  Instead, D. Phoenix is raising the bar.  This is probably the right response.  Consider that divorce tears apart the bonds of society and weakens the concept of the marriage bond.  The prevalence of divorce, easy or hard, has also weakened the concept of marriage.  Better prep could lead to a stronger marriage.  Stronger marriages are less likely to end in divorce. Better prep could raise militate against that particular erosion of marriage.]

The goal is to strengthen marriages and a couple’s Catholic faith at a time when marriage is on the decline in the United States. Few dispute the value of marriage-preparation programs. Studies indicate that a solid course of marriage preparation, particularly one based on developing interpersonal skills, succeeds in reducing divorces.

But some in the church fear the changes detailed in the bishop’s July pastoral letter, "Covenant of Love," which became mandatory this month, may result in even fewer church weddings[Which leads us in a circle back to a fundamental point.  People have a right to marry.]

The letter points to four "concerns" that led to the updated policies, which will include post-wedding marriage classes [The prep had better be pretty darn interesting and well-executed if they think couples are going to come back after the wedding.] and ongoing education about marriage. They are:

• Fewer marriage role models and increased cohabitation.

• A high divorce rate.

• A growing number of single-parent families.

• "Increasing confusion" over the meaning of marriage in society because of efforts to legalize gay marriage.

The changes, Olmsted hopes, will help counteract those trends.

"Many young people know little about their call to be married in the church and to receive the grace of that sacrament," said Michael Phelan, a layman who leads the diocese’s Office of Marriage and Respect Life. [The reason for this is obvious: we have fumbled the ball on catechesis and preaching about fundamentals worse than the Vikings did against the Saints.]

"It could be compared to a dearth of culinary knowledge. If I know little about the difference between eating at a fast-food restaurant and a four-star feast, I won’t value the whole experience." 

Among the changes being instituted are:

Nine months of pre-marriage preparation time instead of six. Several methods of preparation will remain available, including intensive weekend sessions or a series of weeknight meetings, but the time will be lengthened.

A full course in Natural Family Planning, a type of family planning that does not use artificial forms of birth control. The church opposes use of contraceptives, from condoms to pills.

• More comprehensive courses on practical skills and the theology of marriage, including the reasons for the church’s position on gay marriage. The church believes marriage can only be a union between a man and a woman.  [The article sure seems to be focused on this state sanctioned sodomy thing, which I suspect overstresses the point.  As far as practical skills are concerned, I wonder if that won’t have something to do with, for example, family finances, time management, talking to couples who have raised children, etc.  And… and… it just occurred to me… if families weren’t so very shredded these days, the Church wouldn’t have to be the provider of this help.  The same seems to apply to "sex education" in Catholic schools.  Parents are the primary educators of children.  Should the Church be involved in any sort of sex ed?  Perhaps… when it is clear that most parents don’t give their children adequate formation.  Thorny questions.]

Andrew Junker, a reporter for the Catholic Sun diocese newspaper, recently went through the marriage-preparation courses and said he found them worthwhile, even though he was skeptical at first.

"For a lot of people, it seems like a lot of hoops to jump through," he said. "But once we started getting into it, the vast majority was really helpful just on the level of communication."

An increased emphasis on the theological underpinnings of marriage may be helpful to the numerous people seeking Catholic weddings but who are not really practicing the faith, Junker said.

"They presented the theology very positively, not as arcane rules devised to make your life miserable," he said. [Sort of like the Ten Commandments.]

Still, he said, most of his friends are not and would not consider a Catholic marriage if they are considering marriage at all. They are part of a nationwide trend of fewer people getting married. Since 1980, marriage rates in the United States have dropped from 11 per thousand people in 1980 to 7.1 per thousand in 2008, according to the U.S. Census Bureau[Good grief!]

[…]

Church weddings have been on the decline in the Phoenix Diocese, officials say. The diocese covers Maricopa, Yavapai, Coconino and Mohave counties in Arizona.

Out of an average of 27,000 marriage licenses issued a year in those counties – a number that has held steady for 15 years despite population growth – the number of weddings conducted in a Catholic church has dropped from 1,542 in 1993 to 1,389 last year, according to figures provided by the diocese. The numbers have rarely topped 1,800 in the 40-year history of the diocese.

Even though about 15 percent of diocese residents profess to be Catholic, only 5 percent of marriages take place in church.

The decline has occurred even as the diocese has grown at a rate exceeding the population generally, from an estimated 355,000 members in 1993 to 644,000 today.

Mark Gray of Georgetown University, who has researched Catholic marriage in the United States, says the trend is not restricted to Phoenix.

Overall, he said, the number of Catholic marriages has declined from 10 or more per 1,000 Catholics in the 1940s and ’50s to 3.5 today. The number in the Phoenix area for 2008 was 1.9 marriages per 1,000 Catholics.

The reasons, Gray said, may have to do with the rise in divorce and second marriages, which the church may not allow, the trend to getting married later in life, increased numbers of interfaith marriages and a preference for other marriage venues such as resorts or beaches. The latter trend is especially pronounced in Sun Belt states, he said.

[…]

Not everyone agrees with the new policy for Catholics.

[Get this… they had to go out and find a wacko to be the dissenting voice?] Roberta Meehan, an acknowledged foe of Olmsted’s conservative approach who is [pretending to be] ordained as part of the Roman Catholic Womenpriests movement, said the diocese should offer marriage preparation, but one size does not fit everyone.  [No doubt if the diocese said the sky was blue she would say it was lime green.]

"What works for two Ph.D. scientists is not the same for a couple of 19-year-olds just out of high school," she said. "Each couple should be counseled on an individual basis."  [And the sun still rises at dawn… film at 11.]

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged , ,
154 Comments

The Feeder Feed and thanks to readers

I am remiss in sending out shouts and thanks to those of you who have sent things from the wishlist or have made donations through the donation button.   The list is long, but among you are BP of NC, KA, JB, PO, TB of CO, JG of WA, WB, ASD, JW, CG of IL, LR of CA, DD of NY.

Please know that I remember you in prayer as is my duty and pleasure.  On Wednesday 27 Jan I will say Holy Mass for those of you who have recently been benefactors.

Here are a few shots from the feeder, which has been busy today, during a heavy slushy snow.

Despite his appearance, this Nuthatch does not turn up his nose at much of anything.

This Goldfinch is hopping mad about the presence of this chickadee and pretty much chased it around the edge of the feeder.

Variety.


PENJING REPORT

Penjing still has nothing much to say. 

Irohamomiji, the Japanese Maple, lost a lot of leaves, but there are more budding out.  Penzai, the Chinese Elm, also lost a great many leaves, which was alarming, but they have mostly grown back.

Readers have also helped with supplies for repotting, which is overdue in the case of Penjing.  And the Maple really needs a new home as well.

Posted in The Feeder Feed | Tagged
11 Comments

Web series invites viewers to choose outcome of unintended pregnancies

I am uneasy about this.

From CNA with my emphases and comments:

 

Viewers will choose outcome of women with unintended pregnancies in new series

San Diego, Calif., Jan 24, 2010 / 07:06 am (CNA).- A new webcast series will focus on the [NB:] fictional stories of three women who face unintended pregnancies. It will allow viewers to choose how the characters’ stories will end for the final episode.

Yellow Line Studio said the premiere of BUMP+ would be Friday, Jan. 22. Thirteen episodes will follow in February and March, the California Catholic Daily reports.

“From Juno and Bella to Glee and Desperate Housewives, [Note the language] a woman’s right to choose has been explored [trumpted] across the media landscape,” said the series’ executive producer Dominic Iocco. “What makes BUMP+ different from the others is that we’re letting the viewers decide how our characters’ stories will end. We’ve opened the official website to comments and our team will craft the final episodes based on audience feedback. Their choice really is up to you.”  [I am uneasy about this.]

Series co-executive producer Christopher Riley said [GET THIS!] the series was inspired by President Barack Obama’s May 2009 commencement speech to graduates at Notre Dame[?!?  Notre Shame… a gift that keeps on giving.]

“He urged people on both sides of the debate to find ways to communicate about a workable solution to the problem of unintended pregnancies,” Riley explained.

He described the series as an “experiment to see if story can succeed where nearly four decades of angry rhetoric and political posturing have failed.” [Has it?  Is this what should have been done about the civil rights movement?]

We’re not making a moral or political statement; [HUH?  Not moral?   This isn’t a moral issue?] hopefully, we’re starting a conversation with the audience,” Riley added, according to the California Catholic Daily.  [We’ll see.]

Yellow Line Studio said a trailer for the pilot has attracted several comments and personal stories for viewers and it is gaining a following on YouTube, Facebook and Twitter.

The San Diego-based studio describes itself as an independent entertainment company. It operates a satellite office in Los Angeles.

The website of the series is at http://www.bumptheshow.com.

 

I am uneasy about this.

Am I wrong? 

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras |
38 Comments

Karaoke

Have you ever.. I don’t know the proper verb here… done… karaoke?

It seems to pop up all the time in the British TV series I have seen, as well as from time to time in Chinese movies.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
66 Comments

Pope Benedict invites priests to give a ‘soul’ to the fabric of the ‘Web’

First, may I direct you back to an editorial I wrote for the UK’s Catholic Herald?

From CNA:

Holy Father encourages online priestly ministry

Vatican City, Jan 23, 2010 / 10:24 am (CNA).- In his message for the 44th World Day for Social Communications, Pope Benedict calls for priests to "make astute use" of available technology in becoming a presence as community leaders on the web. However, he urges them to remain "less notable for their media savvy than for their priestly heart.[Do I hear an "Amen!"?]

The 2010 World Day for Social Communications will take place on May 16 under the theme "The Priest and Pastoral Ministry in a Digital World: New Media at the Service of the Word." The Holy Father’s message was released today.

The aim of this year’s message is to draw attention to the possibilities for priestly ministry offered within the "important and sensitive pastoral area of digital communications."

For every priest, states the Holy Father in the message, fulfilling the fundamental priority of building up God’s communion "necessarily involves using new communications technologies."

"Priests stand at the threshold of a new era: as new technologies create deeper forms of relationship across greater distances, they are called to respond pastorally by putting the media ever more effectively at the service of the Word."  [Doin’ my part… ]

Pope Benedict emphasizes that "broad new vistas for dialogue, evangelization and catechesis" can be opened up in cyberspace with the presence of priests, living out their traditional role as community leaders in the world of digital communication.

With proper formation on how to use these technologies appropriately and competently, "shaped by sound theological insights and reflecting a strong priestly spirituality grounded in constant dialogue with the Lord" priests have the opportunity to "introduce people to the life of the Church and help our contemporaries to discover the face of Christ."

"Yet," cautions the Holy Father, "priests present in the world of digital communications should be less notable for their media savvy than for their priestly heart, their closeness to Christ."

With their wisdom and preparation, he continues, priests’ presence online "will not only enliven their pastoral outreach, but also will give a ‘soul’ to the fabric of communications that makes up the ‘Web’."  [Nice image.  He has also given us the image of a "digital continent", which requires a special diakonia.]

"A pastoral presence in the world of digital communications, precisely because it brings us into contact with the followers of other religions, non-believers and people of every culture, requires sensitivity to those who do not believe, the disheartened and those who have a deep, unarticulated desire for enduring truth and the absolute."

The Pope reiterates the essential quality of the priest’s spiritual life and solid grounding in faith to his ministry through new technologies at the end of the message, saying that he "must always bear in mind that the ultimate fruitfulness of their ministry comes from Christ himself, encountered and listened to in prayer; proclaimed in preaching and lived witness; and known, loved and celebrated in the sacraments, especially the Holy Eucharist and Reconciliation."

The message ends with a renewed invitation to the clergy, "to make astute use of the unique possibilities offered by modern communications. May the Lord make all of you enthusiastic heralds of the Gospel in the new "agorà" (gathering place) which the current media are opening up."  [Okay… agora brings Pope Benedict back to, more close to the usual "public square" imagery we are used to.  But it serves.  Oh yes… it serves.]

Posted in The Drill | Tagged , , ,
16 Comments

Small world… small connections…

I think most of you have read by now the story about the young man who is a hot baseball prospect, with the A’s, Grant Desme, who has chosen to verify a vocation to the priesthood at St. Michael’s Abbey in Orange, CA.

I had this note from a priest friend and sometime poster here at WDTPRS who knows him:

What you may not know is that the young man, Grant Desme, is from the Latin Mass community of San Clemente in Bakersfield.  What you also may not know is that he served Latin Mass for you and for me (he would have been 7th-8th grade when you were in Bakersfield, and was a high schooler during my time there).

 

God bless him!

Brick by brick.

Posted in Brick by Brick |
29 Comments

SSPX Districter Superior of Germany sends video thanks to Benedict XVI

On kreutz.net you will find a story, in German, about a video from the former superior of the SSPX Fr. Schmidberger thanking the Holy Father for the lifting of the excommunications of the four SSPX bishop.  Fr. Schmidberger is now the SSPX District Superior in Germany/

He expressed regret for the controversy surrounding SSPX bp. Williamson.

He expressed a positive opinion about the beginning of the theological discussions between the SSPX and the Holy See.

He said that the SSPX, with its structures in place around the world, could be very helpful in forming Christians according to the mind of the Church, if only some bishops would support them.

Das Fazit des Distriktoberen: „Falls ein Teil der Bischöfe sich dazu versteht, unser Werk zu unterstützen, und falls die Gläubigen noch vermehrt und tatkräftiger als bisher uns helfen, so kann die Kirche an Haupt und Gliedern erneuert werden und eine Christenheit aufgebaut werden, wie sie die Kirche immer gewünscht hat.“ 

If I were a bishop of a place where the SSPX was active, I would do my best to reach out to them.

I will never be a bishop, thanks be to God, but I hope some bishops reading this might open their hearts and consider what our Holy Father is trying to accomplish, the dangers of our age, and the desire of the Lord that we be one.

I am sure that the great majority of the men in the SSPX are very good and love the Church.  They would, without question, much rather be in union with Rome and the local bishop. 

So much potential… such difficult times.

 

Posted in Ecclesiae unitatem, Pope of Christian Unity | Tagged ,
30 Comments

Good analysis from John Allen about Pope Benedict’s plan

My friend John L Allen, Jr., the nearly ubiquitous fair-minded columnist for the ulta-dissenting National Catholic Reporter has a piece in Forward, a Jewish daily.

Take a look at the full piece, but here is something of interest to WDTPRS readers.  Some of this will sound familiar.

Allen is talking about the seeming contradictions in Pope Benedict’s XVI concern for dialogue with Jews.

However understandable that reaction may be, there is actually a hermeneutic key to Benedict’s papacy, one that lends logic to what can otherwise seem like maddening inconsistencies.

Here it is in a nutshell: Benedict’s top priority is internal, directed at the inner life of the Catholic Church. His aim is to restore a strong sense of traditional Catholic identity, in order to inoculate the church against infection by radical secularism. [Exactly right.] That’s not just a personal hobbyhorse of this pope, but rather the culmination of 50 years of mounting concern inside Catholicism that the church has gone too far in accommodating the ways and means of the secular world. Today, this wave of “evangelical Catholic” energy is the most important policy-setting force in the church.

As a result, when Benedict XVI says or does things that affect Judaism, the key is often to understand that he’s not really talking to Jews but to other Catholics. [Good.]

Thus, Benedict’s decision to revive the old Latin Mass, including that infamous prayer for the conversion of Jews, was certainly not crafted as a statement about Judaism. Instead, [Watch this…] Benedict sees the old Mass as a classic carrier of Catholic identity, an antidote to any tendency to secularize the church’s worship. Likewise, Benedict did not lift the excommunications of four traditionalist bishops, including one who believes the Nazis didn’t use gas chambers, to endorse their troubled history with antisemitism. Rather, he did so because the traditionalists act as a leaven in the church, fostering appreciation for the Catholic past — even if their ideas on some matters lie far from the pope’s own thinking.

John Allen is a good analyst.  He got this exactly right.

Pope Benedict has a plan, what I call his "Marshall Plan" to rebuild our Catholic identity.  If we don’t know who we are as Catholics, we can have little influence in the world around us.  

Liturgy is the tip of the spear.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged
15 Comments

Results of Marist/KC poll: majority of Americans believe abortion is morally wrong

The results of a KC and Marist College poll:

CLICK

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras | Tagged , ,
19 Comments