Check out one blog’s vivisection of Fr. James Martin’s (SJ) claims about LCWR’s vocations v CMSWR’s vocations.

Over at Amerika, our old friend, Fr. James Martin, SJ, wrote a piece in which he manipulated statistics so that it appeared that LCWR orders of nuns were getting as many vocations as the CMSWR nuns (the more traditional groups). That is absurd on the face of it, of course.

I was going to write about it, but Joanne K. McPortland of the blog – love this title – Egregious Twaddle – vivisects Martin’s egregious twaddle. I can’t do better than what she did in exposing the absurdity of his claims.

Tell her Fr. Z sent you!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Magisterium of Nuns, The Drill, Women Religious | Tagged , , , , , , , ,
12 Comments

Nancy Pelosi Says Spirit of Susan B. Anthony Spoke to Her in White House

I think I had better post this without much additional commentary.

From CNSNews:

Nancy Pelosi Says Spirit of Susan B. Anthony Spoke to Her in White House

By Eric Scheiner

(CNSNews.com) House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) told a recent gathering of the Women’s Political Committee that the spirits of suffragists Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Alice Paul spoke to her at the White House.

Pelosi said she heard them say: “At last we have a seat at the table…”

Pelosi says, “He’s (Bush) saying something to the effect of we’re so glad to welcome you here, congratulations and I know you’ll probably have some different things to say about what is going on–which is correct. But, as he was saying this, he was fading and this other thing was happening to me.”

“My chair was getting crowded in,” said Pelosi. “I swear this happened, never happened before, it never happened since.

“My chair was getting crowded in and I couldn’t figure out what it was, it was like this,” she said.

“And then I realized Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, Alice Paul, Sojourner Truth, you name it, they were all in that chair, they were,” said Pelosi. “More than I named and I could hear them say: ‘At last we have a seat at the table.’ And then they were gone…”

Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton were activists in the women’s rights movement during the mid to late 1800’s. The Susan B. Anthony List, which works for pro-life women’s leadership in government, uses her as a namesake. The organization claims Anthony and Stanton were strong pro-life supporters.

WOW.

I wonder if she has been listening to Barbara Marx Hubbard.

Posted in Throwing a Nutty | Tagged
49 Comments

LCWR Assembly Update: How did keynote speaker Hubbard do?

I posted a video of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious assembly’s keynote speaker, Barbara Marx Hubbard, HERE.  If you were able to get through even part of it, you have an idea of what NunThink involves and why the CDF undertook their doctrinal assessment of the LCWR.

How did it go?

At the National Catholic Register, an expert on women religious in the USA, Ann Carey (see her good book), wrote a piece about what happened at the opening of the LCWR assembly.

Futurist Addresses LCWR Assembly  [Perhaps “futurist” is too neutral a term.  Watch the video I linked and make up your own mind.]

by ANN CAREY

[…]

Just to be sure everyone knows who we media are, [I wasn’t invited.] we were issued bright neon green name tags with matching ribbons emblazoned with “MEDIA.” (For this former English teacher, the badge reminds me of Hester Prynne’s “Scarlet Letter.”) And, to make us all feel welcome, we were told, we media were asked to stand up and be recognized at the first open session so that LCWR members could thank us for our good work covering their story this year. [Ha!  They did that so that the media would be more easily recognized, not so that they would be welcome.]

The LCWR members, on the other hand, have white name tags that are their tickets into the “executive sessions” where the CDF mandate will be discussed. But even the members were warned this afternoon before the first executive session about the need for confidentiality. LCWR president, Franciscan Sister Pat Farrell, told the assembly that the LCWR style was “transparent,” but since this was a “critical moment” for the organization, confidentiality was necessary: [So much for transparency.]
If in your own conscience you cannot understand or perceive confidentiality as anything other than total transparency, we ask you to think about not coming to the executive sessions, not in the interest of ever excluding anyone, but in creating the kind of environment we need to really discern with each other in freedom and openness.” [They usually only accuse men of creating an unsafe environment.  Perhaps this is a tacit acknowledgement of SNAP’s concerns?]
In the first open session, the featured speaker, futurist Barbara Marx Hubbard, was led through the assembly hall at the Millennium Hotel by several sisters who were waving orange scarves draped over their arms. [?!?]
Once on the stage, the sisters moved in a circle around Hubbard as they raised and lowered the scarves and the assembly was asked to extend their hands in blessing while singing, “Spirit of vision, Spirit of life! Spirit of courage, be with her now! Wisdom and Truth be on her lips!

[“Eye of newt, and toe of frog,
Wool of bat, and tongue of dog,
Adder’s fork, and blind-worm’s sting,
Lizard’s leg, and howlet’s wing,–
For a charm of powerful trouble,
Like a hell-broth boil and bubble.”]

Hubbard is an engaging speaker, and she knew how to connect with her audience, though the futurist terminology she used left this journalist reaching for a dictionary to look up “noosphere,” “cosmo genesis,” synergistic convergence” and “Christification.”
Hubbard believes that we are at a critical time in humanity, a “tipping point” that will lead to either breakdown or evolutionary [?!?] breakthrough. She made vague references throughout her talk to the “crisis” the LCWR was facing and encouraged the members by saying that breakthroughs often happen only after chaos or crisis. Furthermore, she proclaimed, the LCWR members were just the kind of people to lead humanity to this breakthrough because of their “evolutionary capacities” that had guided the organization over the past 40 years. [So, she pandered.]
“So my conclusion is that you are the best seedbed I know for evolving the Church and the world in the 21st century,” [Without seed.] Hubbard said.
“Almost all structures are top down,” Hubbard continued, giving the examples of nations, states, organized religions and corporations. “So what is needed today,” she continued, “is a radical reform of existing institutions from their top-down version.
I might be wrong, but I believe she was talking about that elephant in the room, and if so, I have to think that is not what Jesus had in mind when he said “Thou art Peter, and upon this rock, I will build my church.”
Maybe I’ll find out tomorrow, for Hubbard will offer her response to a panel on the topic of “Religious Life in the Future: What Might It Look Like?” with Tom Fox, publisher of National Catholic Reporter, Jamie Manson, a columnist for the Reporter, and Sister of Charity of Leavenworth Sister Jennifer Gordon, who is active in Giving Voice, an organization of younger sisters.

Stay tuned.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , , , , ,
52 Comments

No media coverage of the fact that SNAP is protesting at LCWR’s assembly

There is a CNS story about the opening of the LCWR meeting. There is no mention in the story about the fact that SNAP is protesting that the LCWR has been entirely unucooperative preventing abuse of children by women religious (which has happened).

There is no mention of SNAP in the secular paper in St. Louis either.

Here is what SNAP is trying to do. HERE. The handout SNAP has prepared, with a timeline, is HERE.

Just the facts.  You decide what they mean.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , , ,
18 Comments

Quinque Puncta … Five Points To Be Recited Usefully

Please use the sharing buttons!  Thanks!

If we don’t know who we are as Catholics, and if we don’t keep firmly in mind our common Christian vocation to holiness, we will not be able to fulfill our particular vocations and we will not be able, as a Church, to fulfill Christ’s command to bring Him and His Good News to every corner of the world.

We have to know who we are and live who we say we are in order to have any influence in the public square, especially in this time when so many are trying to marginalize Christ and His disciples.

The recovery of our Catholic identity is the point of the New Evangelization and the upcoming Year of Faith, which Pope Benedict has called us to observe.

Old prayer books, as yet untainted by the fuzzy thinking and confused dreaming that oozed out of the “spirit of Vatican II”, have useful, clear, concise prayers which we should – for the sake of our Catholic identity – recover and use and teach to our children.

Here is a fine set of five intentions.  They are distillations, as it were, of the intentions found in various longer prayers and acts of contrition.

Live by these, friends, and you will become saintly, which is the common vocation to which every disciple of Christ is called.

Quinque puncta ante, vel post Missam, aut Communionem, utiliter valde recitanda. Five Points To Be Recited Usefully Either Before Mass or Communion.
I. Detestor et abominor omnia et singula peccata mea, et omnium aliorum commissa ab initio mundi usque in hanc horam, et deinceps usque ad finem mundi committenda: et, si possem, impedirem per gratiam Dei, quam supplex invoco. I. I detest and abhor my each and every sin, and those of all others committed from the beginning of the world until this hour and that will be committed from now unto the end of the world: and, if I could, I would impede them by the grace of God, which on my knees I call upon.
II. Laudo et approbo omnia bona opera, facta a principio mundi usque in hanc horam, et deinceps usque in finem mundi facienda: et, si possem, ea multiplicarem per gratiam Dei, quam supplex invoco. II. I praise and approve of every good work done from the beginning of the world until this hour and that will be done from now unto end of the world; and if I could, I would multiply them by the grace of God, which on my knees I call upon.
III. Intendo omnia facere, dicere et cogitare ad maiorem Dei gloriam, cum omnibus illis bonis intentionibus, quas Sancti unquam habuerunt, vel habebunt, vel habere possunt. III. I intend to act, to speak, and to think all things for the greater glory of God, with all those good intentions which the Saints ever had, or will have, or can have.
IV. Ignosco et dimitto ex toto corde meo omnibus inimicis meis, omnibus me calumniantibus, omnis mihi detrahentibus, omnibus quocumque modo mihi nocentibus, vel volentibus mala. IV. With all my heart I pardon and forgive all my enemies, all those who attack me falsely, all my detractors, and all who have injured me in any way, or have wished evil things upon me.
V. Utinam omnes homines salvare possem moriendo pro singulis! Libenter id facerem per gratiam Dei, quam propterea suppliciter imploro, et sine qua nihil possum. V. Would that I could save all men by dying on behalf of each! I would  do this freely by the grace of God, which I humbly implore on my knees, and without which I can do nothing.

Do not be discouraged if you don’t at this time live up to these aspirations. These five points should be repeated, often. Developing virtues, which are habits, takes a long time, sometimes even the length of a lifetime.

Strive and do not be discouraged.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick, Four Last Things, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices, Year of Faith | Tagged , , , , , ,
18 Comments

LCWR’s Sr. Chittister’s evolving view of being a woman religious.

On the site of the National catholic Fishwrap there is a story about a meeting of the past presidents of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR – a subsidiary of the Magisterium of Nuns). The story, by their obedient acolyte Joshua McElwee, is too long to be of interest in toto. But this gem cannot be overlooked.

The ever-reliable Sr. Joan Chittister, OSB, hot from her hardball interview with Christiane Amanpour at CNN, shared this insight:

“It is only recently that I’ve come to the point where I can say that the function of a Religious is to be religious, not necessarily to be canonical.”

Here we have reason #3667 for the CDF’s doctrinal assessment of religious life.  They have a defective theology of religious life.  Statements like Chittister’s betray the LCWR nuns’ inadequate understanding of what religious are in the Church.

Apart from the question whether the nuns should disband the LCWR as the official liaison with the Holy See, religious in themselves cannot be but canonical, both individually and collectively in their religious institutes (or orders).

All Catholics belong to canonical structures whether they want to or not.  If you doubt me, try to get baptized or married and you will quickly find out what a parish is.  Groups of lay people who get together in an association must deal with canonical issues.  Bishops can remove the designation “Catholic” from organizations.  Lest Sr. Joan not believe this, it is impossible not to be in a canonical structure of some sort.  This is a fortiori the case for all nuns.

Just for kicks, lets have a look at what the (still) Sacred Congregation for Religious and for Secular Institutes wrote in the document  Essential Elements  in the Church’s Teaching on Religious Life as Applied to Institutes Dedicated to Works of the Apostolate back in 1983.  Paragraph 8 says:

When consecration by profession of the counsels is affirmed as a definitive response to God in a public commitment taken before the Church, it belongs to the life and holiness of the Church (cf. Lumen Gentium 44). It is the Church which authenticates the gift and which mediates the consecration.

Also, paragraph 16:

The religious is pledged to obey the directives of lawful superiors according to the constitutions of the institute and further accepts a particular obedience to the Holy Father in virtue of the vow of obedience.

Think about this:

Catholics, by virtue of baptism, participate in canonical structures in the Church.  If the Church mediates the consecration of women religious, then it follows – unavoidably – that religious women participate in canonical structures by virtue of their being religious.

So, Sister Joan, women religious cannot be religious except within canonical structures.  Period.

“But Father! But Father!” some will shout, “Sr. Joan is talking about the canonical structure of the LCWR, not about religious life in general.  You are mean and you hate nuns.”

Sed contra! On the contrary, I like nuns so much I want them to be lovingly embraced within canonical structures!

At one point Sr. Joan was at one point asked, according to the linked article, “whether women religious should live outside formal church structures.”

In summary, it looks to me as if these women really don’t want to be women religious in any sense that Holy Church recognizes.  However, they are afraid to quit because the instant they do, they will be irrelevant.

A case in point.

Consider if you will the group NCAN, an even more radical splinter group of the LCWR, which has fulfilled Sr. Joan’s dream of being without canonical structure.  Their site is HERE, though it has not been updated since 2009 when they gave their coveted Margaret Ellen Traxler Award to Sr. Louise Lears, SC, whom then-Archbishop Raymond Burke of St. Louis placed under interdict for her support of the ordination of women and her attending a fake “ordination”. These days the NCAN types are reduced to holding chat sessions in gated communities for three cats and a tumbleweed rather than in hotels for hundreds of sisters. For example, HERE is the flyer for a May 2012 meeting with the pro-choice Sr. Donna Quinn.  (See my post NUNS GONE WILD!)

This is what Sr. Joan wants?

Whatever Sister wants she should have!

Posted in Magisterium of Nuns, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, Throwing a Nutty, Women Religious | Tagged , , , , , , ,
33 Comments

7 August: Long-Awaited Olympic Hyper-Excitment Sporting UPDATE!

You have, no doubt, been waiting for an exciting update on Olympic Team Handball.

But first, remember this?

[wp_youtube]THUKgZX9pw8[/wp_youtube]

And now the standings:

THE MEN:

THE WOMEN:

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
9 Comments

Question for readers: PC/Windows free e-mail clients?

Do any of you readers use any free PC Windows e-mail clients?

Comments?

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes | Tagged
29 Comments

160th Birthday of Ven. Fr. M. McGivney – NYC – Sunday 12 Aug – Mass, Luncheon, Lecture

As a Knight of Columbus, though rather inactive for quite a while, I am happy to let people know about good things the KCs are doing.

For example, this upcoming Sunday is the 160th Anniversary of the birth of Venerable Fr. Michael J. McGivney, who founded the Knights of Columbus in 1882.  He was born on 12  August 1852, and baptized 19 August. He was ordained a priest for the Diocese of Hartford in 1877.

Thus, if you are in New York City this Sunday, my favorite KC Council, the Regina Coeli Council, #423, is sponsoring a Luncheon and Lecture about Fr. McGivney after the 10 AM Mass at the Church of the Holy Innocents (on 37th between Broadway and 7th Ave near Herald Square).

Fr. McGivney was only 38 when he died in 1890.

When I was did the course, or Studium, with the Congregation for Causes of Saints, one of the positiones I had to read was that of Fr. McGivney.

Although no American-born Catholic priest has yet been beatified or canonized. Fr. McGivney is one of four priests whose life of heroic virtues have been confirmed by decree and who are now called Venerable. The other three priestly Venerables are Nelson Baker (+1936), Solanus Casey (+1957) and, recently, Fulton Sheen (+1979). Three of these four were diocesan priests.  It is possible that Fr. Baker (a late vocation) and Fr. McGivney may have even known each other: it seems that could have attended Our Lady of the Angels Seminary (today Niagara University) at the same time. Here’s a link to the Fr. McGivney Guild, if you are interested in learning more about Fr. McGivney or joining the Guild.

A miracle for his Beatification has been under investigation by the Vatican since 2000.

You may, by the way, notice Q&A on the Guild site discouraging prayer to Fr. McGivney.  There is an explanation.  As part of the process for a cause, it must be established that there is absolutely no public cult direct to the person of the Servant of God in question.  Public cult can dreadfully complicate a cause.  Therefore, prayer is directed to God the Father asking that a miracle be worked through the intercession of a Servant of God.

Please use the combox to provide more information about other events celebrating the 160th Anniversary of Fr. McGivney’s birth.

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
15 Comments

7 August: St. Afra, “sinner” and martyr.

Each day I like to read the entry in the Martyrologium Romanum. Today there are several entries which could be the staring points for discussions of holiness and salvation.

Let us consider this one:

3. Augustae Vindelicorum in Raetia, sanctae Afrae, martyris, quae, peccatrix ad Christum conversa et nondum baptizata, ob Christi confessionem igni tradita esse narratur.

This is a very interesting saint. Her story, even so briefly related here, is one of great hope.

I will let you readers come up with a translation before our observations about what this implies.

Posted in Four Last Things, Our Catholic Identity, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged , , ,
25 Comments