funeral question

Are funerals really no longer for the purpose of praying for the soul of the deceased?

Do the dead no longer need prayers?

I’m just askin’

What are funeral Masses for?

Posted in I'm just askin'... |
88 Comments

Intercessions at a funeral

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, The future and our choices |
77 Comments

A note for today from Ven. Bede

Today’s liturgy, on this feast of the Beheading of John the Baptist, perhaps has something to say about what we are witnessing in another sphere.

From the Office of Readings a selection from Ven. Bede in which we read:

His persecutor had demanded not that he should deny Christ, but only that he should keep silent about the truth.

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Our Catholic Identity, Patristiblogging |
26 Comments

Reviewing good advice

I have been reviewing the always useful and amusing Peter’s Evil Overlord List.

There is some good advice here…

12. One of my advisers will be an average five-year-old child. Any flaws in my plan that he is able to spot will be corrected before implementation.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Global Killer Asteroid Questions, Lighter fare |
3 Comments

How St. Augustine came to be in Hippo

Many bloggers – certainly patristibloggers – will be posting today about St. Augustine.

Rather than relate the same old stuff you already know, you might be interested in other less known episodes from the life of this titanic figure who so influenced the course of Western Civilization.

Here with the help of the best biography of Augustine I have read, by Serge Lancel, is a description of how Augustine was made a priest of Hippo.

BACKGROUND: Augustine had been a Manichean, had gone to Milan for a position as imperial orator, had converted and, once baptized by Ambrose, returned to N. Africa. He started a monastic community in his home town of Thagaste and began to recruit for his community, traveling and interviewing likely candidates. Augustine would avoid towns which had no bishops, for he feared being constrained to remain and to be consecrated.  In what follows, from Lancel’s Augustine,  (pp. 150 ff) (emphasis mine).

Passing through Hippo to meet a friend who wanted to talk to him about his monastic vocation, Augustine had had to prolong his stay, as we have seen, because of the man’s wavering. There he attended church and took part in the services without keeping on the alert, since the bishopric was duly provided with a bishop. But he, Valerius, was old; Greek by birth, he was a mediocre speaker in Latin and knew no Punic at all, though it was a good thing to know at least a few words to use with the rustic faithful, who spoke the remnants of Carthage’s ancient language, very much bastardized, as a kind of patois. In a text from this era, Augustine records a detail about his bishop which is very significant in this respect: in a conversation between peasants Valerius had heard the word salus – or at least something near it – and had asked one of them who also knew Latin what the word meant; he had answered ‘three’ (tria), and Valerius had gone into ecstasies over the remarkable meeting, between one language and the other, of "salvation" and the Trinity!

Moreover, the Christian community headed by Valerius was not in a good position at this time. The Manichaeans prospered at Hippo, under the leadership of a "priest" named Fortunatus, whom Augustine had known previously at Carthage when they had been co-religionists in the sect, and whose clever proselytism had won followers among the town’s citizens as well as in the little foreign colony. At the same time, the community itself was divided: the Donatists there were in a strong position, and their bishop, Faustinus, was able to indulge in a gesture as serious and symbolic as forbidding bakers to cook bread for the Catholic minority. Valerius clearly lacked the stature to stand up to them, even less to put the situation right. Was Augustine unaware of this state of affairs? The faithful of Hippo, for their part, were only too conscious of it, and when the old bishop declared in his sermon that he needed a priest who was capable of helping him, there was a unanimous shout from the congregation. Immediately recognized, surrounded, dragged into the apse to the bishop in his chair, Augustine was ordained priest forthwith.

He had not been able physically to oppose this enforced ordination. He burst into tears and, Possidius recorded later, some of the congregation mistook the meaning of his tears, seeing them as chagrin for entering the clergy through the back door, instead of acceding directly to the episcopacy! Assuredly, those tears had quite a different significance; as Possidius also says, setting down what Augustine later confided to his friends, looking ahead to his almost inevitable elevation to the position of bishop, "he had the premonition of the multiplicity and immensity of the perils that the guidance and government of a church would bring to bear on his life." Here again, even though Hippo was not Milan, the image that came to his mind, symbolic of such a heavy burden, was that of Ambrose, whom he had seen to terribly busy, faced with such important responsibilities. But there was still something else at the root of the knot of anguish which had formed in his heart; such a rude change of destiny implied a farewell to what had been his considered aspiration, since Milan and Cassiciacum in 386, of which the deificari in otio, of course, in his letter to Nebridius told of his strong spiritual need, a life of the spirit and of prayer in a monastic setting, which did not rule out serving others but did not put it in institutional terms. In the evening of his life, making an appraisal of it in a sermon to those people to whom he had devoted his life, the bishop says: "I had said farewell to all worldly hopes, and what I might have been I no longer wished to be; but by no means did I seek to be what I am." On that day early in 391, with a few fine books already behind him, but with an immense work in gestation in his head, he knew that henceforward days would no longer suffice, and that night vigils would have to be added to daily work: in die laborans et in nocte lucubrans, as Possidius would write.

Augustine already had a pretty sound theological training, and ran no risk of finding himself actually in the situation Ambrose had experienced, of having to learn while teaching, but he was aware that Valerius had appealed to him particularly for the ministry of preaching. And for that first time in his life, someone who know how to speak before the high and mighty of this world, address a cultivated public, correspond with people who were more or less his peers, now had to envisage speaking before the lowly of Hippo, before fisherman (piscatores) who were also sinners (peccatores), for whom Christ had come more than for philosophers and the erudite, and whom he had to reach with their own words. He had already been reproached for the difficulty of understanding certain of his works; besides complementing his scriptural reading, he needed to learn to speak in simple terms – ad usum populi – of things as complicated as the soul, God or the Trinity. Only just ordained, he asked for leave, for both study and meditation.

The letter he addressed to his bishop was preserved. Nothing, he says first, is more satisfying than the office of bishop,priest and even deacon, but nothing is more srethced than to perform it for the vainglory of the social status that accompanies it. And nothing is more difficult than to do it when fully conscious of the lofty mission entrusted to a bishop, priest or deacon. He continues:

I was ordained when I was thinking of giving myself time to get to know the divine Scriptures, and I had made my arrangements so as to benefit from the otium necessary for his negotium. And, to tell the truth, I did not yet know what I lacked for this task, which now torments and crushes me … Perhaps your Holiness will object: "I would like to know what is missing in your education." My reply is that the things I don’t know are so many that I could more easily enumerate those that I know than those I would like to know. I would dare to say that I know and hold with firm faith what concerns my own salvation; but how could I make use of this knowledge for the salvation of others, "seeking not what is useful to me but what is useful too the greater number for their salvation" (cf. 1 Cor. 10.23)? and perhaps, or rather without any doubt, there are counsels written in the holy books which, by knowing and meditating upon them, the man of God may improve his service in ecclesiastical matters and even, in the hands of sinners, either live without failing his conscience, or die, but without losing the only life that is worth Christian hearts sighing for, in humility and meekness. But how could that be obtained except as the Lord himself says: "by asking, seeking, knocking at the door" (cf. Matt.7.7; Luke 11.9)? That is to say, by means of prayers, reading and tears. It is with this aim that I wanted to ask my brothers to obtain from your very earnest and venerable Charity a little time, just until Easter, which I now desire and hereby request.

Augustine obtained a few weeks’ liberty from Valerius. Perhaps not quite until Easter, which fell that year on 6 April, for there is at least one sermon delivered by the new priest included in the series of "quadragesimal" catechesis sermons, to bear witness that his priest ministry began at Hippo as early as March 391. Where did he go for his brief additional spell of training? Probably Thagaste, at his home, or rather in the "monastery" he would leave to Alypius. For he would have had to settle his affairs, before organizing his life and that of his future companions at Hippo in the real monastery for which Valerius had offered him the material wherewithal. The bishop had in fact given him a house with a garden near the cathedral church. At the cost of accepting the priesthood, and having to give up a great deal, Augustine had attained the goal to which he had aspired for a good few years. We shall have occasion to return to both the concrete realities and the developments and regulatory arrangements of the monastic life he would live at Hippo for nearly forty years.

Posted in Classic Posts, Patristiblogging, Saints: Stories & Symbols |
10 Comments

QUAERITUR: altar and ambo

From a reader:

What is the significance of the ambo being elevated? Should it be as high as the altar? What should their positioning be relative to one another? I ask these questions, because I recently made the statement that if one had to pick between the two, it would be better to have the altar elevated rather than the ambo. I was challenged fairly convincingly that this would degenerate the Liturgy of the Word, which is in fact just as important to the mass as the Liturgy of the Eucharist. Who was right?

 

I suppose the ambo is elevated so, practically, it can be more easily seen.

However, if there has to be a choice between elevating the ambo or the altar, I would answer that the altar should be elevated.

This doesn’t, of course, rule out very high pulpits, as in older churches.

I am not sure if any official documents of the Church address this issue.  Perhaps some readers will know.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
18 Comments

The bones of St. Augustine

Augustine died on 28 August 430.

His friend and biographer Possidius describes his last days during the siege of Hippo by the Vandals. Sometime before the early 8th century, Augustine’s remains were translated from N. Africa to Sardinia for fear of desecration. It is possible that St. Fulgentius of Ruspe took Augustine’s body to Sardinia. Fulgentius had run afoul of the Arian Vandal overlords in N. Africa and was driven out. 

During the 8th century Augustine’s remains were in danger again, but this time by another gang of vandals called Arabs, who were swarming all over the Mediterranean as pirates and brigands.

Sometime between 710 and 730 King Liutprand of the Lombards translated Augustine a second time and, on some 11 October, had him interred in Pavia in the church of San Pietro in Ciel d’Oro.

It is thought that Liutprand had to pay a huge ransom the bones from some Muslim thug. (Hard to believe, I know.) Eventually, with the passage of time people simply forgot where the saints bones actually physically were in the church.

Eventually the church itself came to be controlled by two different Augustinian groups, the Canons Regular and the Hermits. Let’s just say their relations were strained and leave it at that.

Then something happened that set off the war between them.

In 1695 a group of workman were excavating under the altar in the crypt of the church. They found a marble box containing human bones. The box apparently had some charcoal markings spelling the part of the word "Augustine", though those markings disappeared.

Great chaos ensued.

The Benedict XIIImemory of just where the relics of Augustine were placed in the church had been lost through the passing of the years. Finding them again set off a rather unedifying battle for their control between the Augustinian Hermits and the Canons Regular. Eventually Rome had to step in to resolve things. Pope Benedict XIII, a Dominican who changed his numbering from XVI to XIII so as to avoid counting an anti-pope, got involved personally. He was very interested in saints and canonized the huge number of 18! This was also at the time when the future Pope Benedict XIV, Propsero Lambertini, published his fourth and final volume On the beatification of the servants of God and of the canonization of the blessed. Pope Lambertini would give us the legislation for the canonical processes of canonizations that has lasted with some few changes to today.

In any event, Benedict XIII sent a letter to the Bishop of Pavia telling him to get their act together and figure out the questions of authenticity and control.

Additional studies were made under someone appointed by Benedict and by 19 September of 1729 things were wrapped up. Processions were held, solemn proclamations made about the authenticity of the relics, a great Te Deum was sung and there was a fireworks display, and anyone who decided to disagree and start the bickering again would be excommunicated. The good old days, no?

The next year under Pope Clement XII the Cardinal Secretary of State (and a patron of the Canons Regular) commissioned the carving of the large main altar with its reliefs, completed in 1738, and which you can now see today in the church where Augustine’s tomb is even now.

Posted in Classic Posts, Saints: Stories & Symbols |
10 Comments

The Exceptional Catholic

Is it true that Pres. Obama is slated to give a eulogy during a Funeral Mass for the late Sen. Kennedy?

I am not quite sure, but this is what the news reports are suggesting.

I’m just askin’

If so….

Q. 1) When were eulogies during a Mass approved?

Q. 2) Should Sen. Kennedy have a Catholic funeral?

Q. 3) Will the sight of the most aggressively pro-abortion President in history giving a eulogy, in a Catholic church… during a Mass… for the most aggressively pro-abortion Catholic Senator give scandal to the Catholic faithful?

A. 1) They haven’t been approved.  The Rite of Christian Funerals 141 says: “A brief homily based on the readings is always given after the gospel reading at the funeral liturgy and may also be given after the readings at the vigil service; but there is never to be a eulogy.” The 2000 GIRM 338 says: "At the funeral Mass there should as a rule be a short homily, but never a eulogy of any kind. The homily is also recommended at other Masses for the dead celebrated with a congregation."

A. 2) Perhaps.  It depends on whether he showed some adequate sign of repentance before his death.  We have to be lenient on that point.  Given what I heard of Sen. Kennedy’s last hours, I would not fuss too much about this.  I am disturbed, because of his decades long unrepentant support of abortion, and the scandal that caused… but… the Church’s law is very lenient.  Thank God.

A. 3) Scandal?  D’ya think?

QUAERITUR… QUAERUNTUR…

I want to believe that the soul of Ted Kennedy will someday see God face to face.  I desire this for every soul.  I know that not all souls will see God… but I sincerely desire all to be saved through … whatever… loophole… bolthole… I don’t care.  God let him be saved.

That said…

Do rules which are supposed to apply to all Catholic apply to Sen. Kennedy?

He seems to be The Exception.  He is like … what… European Royalty? 

Are there special rules in the Catholic Church for the Kennedy Clan?

He can be strongly pro-choice and be courted by Cardinals.

He can have the pro-abortion President of the United States deliver a eulogy at his Funeral Mass.

Do canon law and liturgical law apply to the Kennedy Clan?

The visual image for the TV coverage could be … maybe… the pic from the Vatican’s Secret Archives of the Bull granting Henry VIII a divorce.

Picture this.

The swirling TV CGI graphics for the funeral. 

The title swishes in over meaningful music.

In bleeds (sorry) an image of the Bull.

As it recedes, with old videos of the life of beloved Teddy… Dux, and perhaps old Masses before the Council.

The thematic title for the network news coverage, just as elaborate for, say, a bear stuck in a tree or maybe a car chase, ….

The Exception – The Funeral
Think of this… who will attend the funeral Mass?

VP Biden
Speaker Pelosi
Sen. Kerry
Sen. Dodd
Sen. …?

Will they, as royalty, receive Holy Communion?

If it is a funeral Mass, who will say the Mass and who will recieve?  And why?

Notre Shame isn’t over.

Will the Obama Kennedy Eulogy be Notre Dame II?

 

Posted in I'm just askin'... |
54 Comments

Consecration of a chalice in the traditional Roman manner

A Catholic Life has a great entry about the consecration of a chalice in the older, traditional older Roman Rite.  Be sure to check it out!

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Just Too Cool, Linking Back, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM |
8 Comments

QUAERITUR: priest adds words to the consecration

From a reader:

I had a question regarding a practice that occurs at my parish. One of our associates who offers Mass changes words here and there which I know do not invalidate the Mass, although it is a serious problem/abuse.  Recently, at the consecration a new "invention" must have entered his mind. He consecrates the Host according  to the rubrics; the Precious Blood is where is the problem lies. This is what he says, "Take this all of you and drink from it; this is the cup of my blood, the blood of the new and everlasting covenant which will be shed for you and for all. Then he said to them, do this in memory of me." I underlined his added phrase.  My question is whether this invalidates the Mass since he is taking himself out of persona Christi by saying, "he said to them"?

I do not think that this invalidates the consecration of the Precious Blood.

However, what he is doing is a serious abuse.

Priests are not to add anything to the texts of Mass, especially in an important moment such as the consecration!

It seems to me that one should ask him respectfully about this and, if nothing comes from it, speak to his pastor and then write the local bishop with a summary of everything that happens and everything you did.

Perhaps Father would like a "SAY THE BLACK DO THE RED!" coffee mug, or there should be one of these framed plaques in the sacristy.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
10 Comments