I’m just askin’…

Why is Gwen Ifill to be the moderator of the Palin-Biden VP debate?

Gwen Ifill has written a highly favorable book about Sen. Obama, Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama

The release of the book is 20 January. 

Does that date sound familiar?

He book release is timed to coincide with the January Presidential inauguration.

Gwen Ifill has a financial interest in Sen. Obama’s victory.

This is a conflict of interest, and she should step aside gracefully.

But let’s take this a bit deeper.

Who thought this was a good idea?

Perhaps because Gov. Palin is a woman, they wanted a female moderator.

Would questions be raised if Ann Coulter had been selected for her work on If Democrats Had Any Brains, They’d Be Republicans

Not a media show host, you say?  Okay, how about Laura Ingraham… she has a show and writes books too.

No no… let’s leave the female angle aside, you insist.  They wouldn’t be that shallow.

Would questions be raised if, for example, Jerome Corsi, author of The Obama Nation, were chosen to be the moderator?

I’m just askin’…

Posted in I'm just askin'... |
28 Comments

Sabine Spaghetti Supper

I am still working on the pork roast, but last night, hungry, I added some pasta.  I made a sauce from things grown here in the Sabine garden.

You can see my sweet and small hot peppers, garlic, tomatoes, basil, garlic, fresh green fennel seeds.  I didn’t grow the salt.

The whole thing had to be reduced for a while.  Then I added the herbs.

I didn’t want to overdo basil with this.  I could have used oregano, but I wanted to keep it on the sweeter side.

At a certain point it can help to add some starchy water from the pasta pot.  This can bring the sauce together if it is sufficiently starchy.  I don’t often do this, because you mostly run a risk of making the sauce watery at the wrong time of the process: bad!

Yum.

Then I settled in to watch the noble Twins against the hated White Sox. 

Alas, evil triumphed, …

… but supper was great!

Posted in My View |
33 Comments

QUAERITUR: heading off the altar girls

Here we go again.

I got a question from a reader:

As I greatly enjoy cooking, your last few posts have been a treat! Thank you for your blog and its plethora of liturgical and culinary delights.

[O]ur pastor is going to be incorporating altar girls into the parish life sooner or later. This a subject close to my heart and it pains me greatly to think that an unbroken tradition of altar boys at our parish will cease to exist. It also worries me because I do not think the parish will handle it too well. Then there are those who will applaud "progress" in our "lifeless" parish. It could become sharply divisive.

But you have probably dealt with this sort of thing before, so you would understand. I am going to discretely voice my concerns with Father before I do anything else, since it seems that nobody really knows yet. Do you have any recommendations as to what I should say? I remember reading your explanation that boys are appropriate because they substitute for an instituted ministry. Is there anything else I should bring to this meeting?

One thing I know that is important is charity. Father is not one to say the red and do the black. He might be concerned that some of the Masses have been less well-attended by the altar boys. We have a solid group, though, so I cannot see how altar girls could be justified since there is not a severe shortage here. I dunno. Your thoughts (and perhaps commentary from fellow WDTPRSers) would be greatly appreciated.

 

We have approached this several times, but I think we can return to this thorny topic with some concise comments.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
14 Comments

Where is St. Jerome’s body?

I posted this last year, but I put so much work into it that it deserves recycling on this feast of St. Jerome.

Some time ago, there was a discussion on one of our splendid Catholic blogs making mention of the burial place of St. Jerome perhaps in the Major Basilica of St. Mary Major in Rome. This is an interesting story and I dug into it a little. This is what I found.

We read in J.N.D. Kelly’s work Jerome: His Life, Writings, and Controversies (Duckworth, 1975, p. 333 – emphasis mine) :

Apocryphal lives extolling [Jerome’s] sanctity, even his miracles, were quick to appear, and in the eighth century he was to be acclaimed, along with Ambrose, Augustine, and Gregory the Great, as one of the four Doctors of the Church.[2] In the middle ages his works were eagerly copied, read, and pillaged; while towards the end of the thirteenth century the clergy of Santa Maria Maggiore, at Rome, were to persuade the public, perhaps themselves too, that his remains had been transported from Bethlehem to Italy, and could be venerated close to certain presumed fragments of the Saviour’s crib.[3]

Note 2: This was formally ratified by Pope Boniface VIII on 20 Sept. 1295: see Corpus iuris canonici II, 1059 (ed. E. Freidburg, Leipzig, 1879-81). The original number four (the list was later to be greatly expanded) was chosen so that the Doctors could match the Evangelists.

Note 3: The story of their alleged translation, in response to a visionary appearance of Jerome himself, is set out by J. Stilting in Acta Sanctorum XLVI, Sept. VIII, 636 (Antwerp, 1762); it is reprinted in PL 22, 237-40. Stilting also provides a discussion of its date, veracity, etc. on pp. 635-49.

In the Acta Sanctorum for 30 September, under the entry for St. Jerome, we find the following section with its articles:

LXV. Corpus Sancti ex Palestina Romam translatum, depositumque in basilica s. Mariae Majoris. The body of the saint was brought to Rome from Palestine, and put in the Basilica of St. Mary Major.
LXVI. Inquiritur tempus quo Sancti corpus Romam delatum. An investigation is made into the time when the body of the saint was brought back to Rome.
LXVII. Corpus Sancti depositum prope aediculam Praesepis, conditum deinde ibidem altare, sub quo positum, ubi mansit usque ad pontificatum Sixti V, quando dicitur clanculum ablatum & absconditum. The body of the saint was placed near to the small chamber of the Crib, established then right at the same altar, under which it was placed, where it remained until the pontificate of Sixtus V, when it is said to have been secretly taken away and hidden.
LXVIII. Corpus Sancti clanculum ablatum & absconditum dicitur, ne transferretur alio a Sixto V: deinde frequenter frustra quaesitum. The body of the saint is said to have been secretly taken away and hidden lest it were to be transferred to another place by Sixtus V: aftward it is frequently sought in vain.
LXIX. An reliquae, sub altari principe S. Mariae Majoris inventae, videantur illae ipsae, quae ut corpus S. Hieronymi ad illam basilicam fuerunt translatae. When the relics found under the main altar of St. Mary Major which had been transferred to that Basilica seem to be the very same as the body of St. Jerome.
LXX. Admodum verisimile & probabile inventas esse S. Hieronymi. Clearly the [relics] found are most like and probably of Saint Jerome.
LXXI. Respondetur ad objectionem ex reliquiis Nepesinis: reliquiae, quae verisimiliter sunt S. Hieronymi sub mensa principis altaris depositae. An objection is answered about the relics at Nepi: relics placed under the main altar which more than likely are those of St. Jerome.
LXXII. Reliquiae Sancti in pluribus civitatibus Italiae, Galliae, Germaniae, Belgii, & aliis provinciis. The relics of the saint in more cities in Italy, France, Germany, Belgium and other provinces.
LXXIII. Cultus S. Hieronymi: festivitates eius & Officia. The veneration of St. Jerome: his feasts and offices.

Here is the page where these articles begin. If you want to have a fuller experience of the joys (the chore) of reading the Acta Sanctorum for any length of time click here for a larger image.

Posted in Classic Posts, Patristiblogging |
2 Comments

Sabine Report: black pots, changing leaves, and ancient recipes

In an another entry I quoted a Latin phrase which sparked some additional conversation.  This is a good opportunity to reenter the Sabine flow of things on WDTPRS, for I am indeed back at the Sabine Farm.

I quoted: Vae tibi tam nigrae, dicebat caccabus ollae.

Commenter Jeff offered:

“’Alas, so black you are,’ said the pot to the kettle.”

Which is fine, though I would do it more like:

“’Woe to you, so black you are!’ said the fry pan to the cook pot.”

I am not dead sure about frying pan and cooking pot for these instruments, but I am guessing based on my reading of a recipe in the late 4th early 5th century cookbook attributed to the 1st century Apicius, De re coquinaria.

Here is the recipe. Let me know what you think – aside from the fact that it looks pretty good.  Did I get the pans right in your opinion?

3. Gruem vel anatem ex rapis: lavas, ornas et in olla elixabis cum aqua, sale et anetho dimidia coctura. rapas coque, ut exbromari possint. levabis de olla, et iterum lavabis, et in caccabum mittis anatem cum oleo et liquamine et fasciculo porri et coriandri. rapam lotam et minutatim concisam desuper mittis, facies ut coquatur. modica coctura mittis defritum ut coloret.

ius tale parabis : piper, cuminum, coriandrum, laseris radicem, suffundis acetum et ius de suo sibi, reexinanies super anatem ut ferveat. cum ferbuerit, amulo obligabis, et super rapas adicies. piper aspargis et adponis.

See what I mean? 

I could call that caccubus a roasting pan, I suppose, but I think frying pan fits.

Now that hunting season is coming, and some ducks and other birds will be coming my way to die and to be eaten – bless them – I might have to try this.  On a shelf I have the English edition of Apicius someone worked up.  This recipe is included!

I’ll let you work on your own perfect versions of the recipe for Crane or Duck with Turnips before I post what this English edition worked up with modern measures.

Horace might have had something like this at the original Sabine Farm!

Maybe Augustine ate something like this in North Africa, at least before his enforced poverty in his monastic mode in Hippo.

I don’t say this idly, either.

And if he did, I bet he would have used implements like these which follow. 

These I found in the British Museum a few short days ago.  They were found in the site of ancient Carthage. One dish is inscribed with the family name Cresconius, who were prominent in the late fourth and early fifth centuries. 

This hoard of silver was could have been hidden when the Vandals swept through Carthage (on their way also to Hippo, where Augustine died in 430 during the siege).  More likely is that it was squirred away around 400 during the Donatist controversy Augustine fought in so strenuously.  Remember that in 405/06 Augustine wrote an anti-Donatist work called Contra Cresconium grammaticum et donatistam

Did this silver belong to the fellow against whom Augustine wrote?  Possibly.

In the meantime, Sabine autumn is setting in with splendor.

Here come the apples on the tree next to the chapel.  They are wonderful and I am picking and cooking with them.  More on that below.

Colors are coming.  I love this time of year.

Weather can be dramatic, which adds to the vistas.

Tonight I am not making crane, but rather a stuffed pork roast.

Pork was the default meat for the ancient Romans, by the way, just as it is in Chinese.  Romans didn’t like to eat beef.  Anyway, after my long absence, I had to get some groceries and found this roast at an absurdly low sale price and figured I could eat it for a few days, after observing the Feast of the Archangel Michael.   The apples will be reduced with some peppers I grew, along with herbs such as thyme and a little lemon peel and perhaps a touch of gin for the botanicals and its stringency at just the right moment.  The stuffing has rosemary, parseley, sage, thyme and fennel, all from the garden.

For the jansenistic types who hate good food cheaply but creatively made, or the idea that someone somewhere might be eating a decent meal, I figure this whole thing cost about $6, including the bread, excluding the cost of seeds at the beginning of spring and the price of about two ounces of gin (though I use more to make a martini in honor of the angelic choir).  Dunno what the gas for the oven cost.

I might use a few table spoons of flour to make gravy at the end. 

Whew!  This is getting expensive!

Still… it’ll feed me for probably three days, I think. 

Yes, I think I’ll have that martini now.

Cheers!

UPDATE:

Here are the results.

But first, someone asked how I made the apple sauce.  Simple.  I peeled and cored the apples, cut them up, tossed them in the pan with some stuff, added water cooked them down.  Easy peasy.

The stuffed pork roast after a 350 degree oven for … a while.

Plated and ready to go down the little red lane.  I had some juice and scrapings from the pan, but I had to get some gravy I made another time and froze.  Just didn’t have enough.

And a shot from this morning, because it was so beautiful.

Posted in My View |
53 Comments

What Does the Samizdat Really Say?

I found this great comment on the blog of Damian Thompson Holy Smoke about the London Blognic (here and here).

A few nights ago I joined a group of Catholic bloggers in a pub in Victoria. They included the world-famous Fr Z from America, Fr Tim Finigan and Mac McLernon ("Mulier Fortis"). We felt like a group of East European dissidents swapping samizdat literature in the 1970s.

LOL!

 

For those of you born after the Cold War, "samizdat" is a Russian term for how dissidents against Soviet Communist oppression would create and circulate literature.

 

Posted in Linking Back |
3 Comments

A Protestant Pastor reacts to the Communion rail entry

When I see that someone has linked back to WDTPRS, I will sometimes go find out what is going on.  I often find gems.

For example, on the blog Power, Love, Self-Discipline a pastor of a United Church of Christ parish reflects on what I wrote here about Communion rails. 

Here is a large part, but you should go check out what he wrote in full.

I was on the blog yesterday of Father John Zuhlsdorf, a Catholic priest and prolific writer on all things Catholic and liturgical. If you follow the link, you’ll find an entry concerning altar rails.  Apparently, there are churches (even Catholic churches) that are tearing them out, seeking to reduce the distance between a priest and a parish that this physical dividing line inevitably causes.  But is this a good thing?  Father Z finds this to be a disturbing trend, and he argues for the usefulness of the altar rail.  But I want to draw your attention to one of his arguments in particular:

Lay people and the ordained have different roles in the liturgy. They have their own particular places. When you blur those places by making them less distinct, you undermine something important in the hearts and minds of the clergy and congregation.  When you constantly tell people that they are being empowered by being given things to do and places to sit or stand that cannot be distinguished from what the clergy do, you are really telling them that on their own they aren’t good enough. They are really not good enough unless they do things priests do, or sit where they sit.


This blew me away because it perfectly describes me.  Part of the reason I wanted to be a minister is because it seemed like I couldn’t be the best Christian I could be unless I was a minister.  All the best Christians I knew were pastors (I now see how wrong that was), which suggested to me that clergy were on another spiritual plane that couldn’t be accessed unless on was clergy.  Furthermore, if it was acceptable for me to preach as a 15-year-old, then I wasn’t doing enough, and was therefore less of a Christian, when I wasn’t preaching.  The thought never entered my mind that I may have a vital role to play in worship as a member of the congregation. 
I wonder if I would have felt this way if there were a greater distinction between clergy and congregation growing up, if the creep of egalitarianism wasn’t so strong.  What if there were places I wasn’t allowed to go on the altar?  What if someone had explained to me that there are things the pastor does that the congregation can’t do, and things the congregation does that the pastor can’t do?  What if I knew that both are essential for worship (and, by extension, we do great harm to the worship of the church when we don’t show up)?  I wonder if I would have valued the sacraments and the preaching of the Word more if I had a better understanding of the differences between ordained and lay.

I applaud this fellow’s questions. 

The writer, Pastor Sam Chamelin is 25 years old.

 

Posted in Linking Back |
10 Comments

QUAERITUR: Who should receive Anointing of the Sick?

A reader asks:

I have a friend who is undergoing foot surgery soon. Although it is minor surgery, she will be under general anesthesia for over two hours. Her sister ended up in a coma for two weeks following a surgery so she wants to make sure she has her ducks in order confession, anointing of the sick etc. She went to our pastor and wanted to make an appointment for anointing and he said that it was not serious enough surgery and that cannon law dictates she can’t receive it. He commented that the faithful don’t know enough cannon law to understand it is an abuse of the sacrament to give it so freely. Is this right? And is there abuse in giving the sacrament freely to those who are sick?  My friend is very upset about it. Your advice would be very welcome . Thank you for your help father. My prayers are with you.

In my opinion the priest is both right and wrong.

He is right that the sacrament should not be given frivolously.  And it is very often given frivolously!

For example, I have seen regularly scheduled Masses at a parish for seniors wherein everyone, even the young people who brought the seniors, troops up to be anointed.  That is an abuse of the sacrament for more than one reason.

First, though some of those people were pretty old, no one was in obvious danger of death.

Second, this sacrament should if possible be received in the state of grace.  If a person is incapacitated, the sacrament of Anointing also forgives sins, but if a person is capable of confessing he should confess properly and receive absolution before being anointed.

Third, group anointing like that both reduce respect for the sacrament and nearly always insure that the sacrament is improperly administrated.

So, people who are sick with a cold probably shouldn’t be given this sacrament. The Second Vatican Council said that "’Extreme Unction," which may also and more properly be called ‘anointing of the sick,’ is not a sacrament for those only who are at at the point of death.  Hence, as soon as anyone of the faithful begins to be in danger of death from sickness or old age, the fitting time for that person to receive this sacrament has certainly already arrived." [SC 73]

The problem is that everyone is always in danger of death, which comes to us we know not when.

Let us remember that Anointing was and still is called Extreme Unction… the word "Extreme" does not mean that you are giving it on a skateboard or you are using huge amounts of oil. 

It means that a person is "in extremis", that is, "in danger of dying".

IMO, I think she could be anointed due to the reason that she is going to have general anesthesia.  For me that is a deciding factor.  General anesthesia is always risky business, no matter what the actual surgery is, minor or major, because it often involves inducing paralysis and it requires airway management.

I am cautious about whom I anoint and for what reason.  I insist on regular confession and absolution, preferably after Mass with Communion, and then in close proximity to the actual surgery which must be risky enough to warrant this "danger of death" sacrament. 

My view of general anesthesia, even as highly developed as it is now, is such that I see it as an great enough risk to warrant anointing.  Other priests may not agree, and they are free to.  I have made my decision after discussions with physicians, including an anesthesiologist, and after having witnessed surgeries from the observer’s position next to the place where the anesthetist or anesthesiologist works, and after my own experiences of anesthesia.

In this case, I think it would be okay to seek the sacrament from another priest if the pastor does not want to administer it.

At the same time, I think it is good that the priest is diligent about the care of the Sacrament of Anointing.  He shouldn’t be overly criticized.  He seems to be taking it seriously, which is positive.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
49 Comments

Time for Time

My visit to see time was great! I have been interested in clocks and the history of the Royal Navy for years. This it was avrral pleasure to visit the Nrlson displays in the Maritime Museum and then go to the Meridian and come face to face with the Harrison timepieces!

It gave me a bit of a shiver to see H4!

When I was very young I would listen on shortwave radio to hear the inexorable passage of the seconds minutes hours calculated from Greenwich Mean Time.

Here I am as I write this and send it.

What comes to mind is the line from Scripture that the passage of our days is like the shuttle of a loom.

Just some time out from my time quest.

Posted in My View |
7 Comments

QUAERITUR: Communion rails – Fr. Z rants

A question from a reader:

I am wondering if there was once a "law" about the Altar Rail in a Catholic Church.  Did, or does, Canon Law, GIRM, or The Ritus Servandus speak to this piece of Church architecture?

 

I am away from my library at the moment, but I am not sure there was a specific law on the books.  Spaces and architecture vary so much. Maybe someone can chime in on that.  Trimeloni might speak to this.

But the important thing is that there is no law that says that Communion rails were to be torn out!

The mania of eliminating the distinction between the priesthood of the ordained and the priesthood of the baptized, the obsession with "empowering" the laity by bringing them into the sanctuary, the insanity of thinking that modern man is all grown up now and doesn’t have to kneel as if before a feudal lord, resulted in architectural devastation.  It also undermined our identity as Catholics and our faith in the Real Presence.

Communion rails were among the things torn out, but the hearts of Catholic people were the real victims.

The altar rail serves to delineate the place of the the congregation in a church. 

Lay people and the ordained have different roles in the liturgy.  They have their own particular places.   When you blur those places by making them less distinct, you undermine something important in the hearts and minds of the clergy and congregation. 

When you constantly tell people that they are being empowered by being given things to do and places to sit or stand that cannot be distinguished from what the clergy do, you are really telling them that on their own they aren’t good enough.  They are really not good enough unless they do things priests do, or sit where they sit. 

Within the Hebrew temple, a sacred space, there was the Holy of Holies into which the High Priest would enter.  In our churches there must also be such a space marked off as the proper place of expiation and sacrifice, the priestly place.  This takes nothing away from lay people.

Some will say that Communion rails and kneeling and all that was just a later, Medieval accretion.  For those of that ilk, "Medieval" is always "bad".   On the other hand, these things developed as our understanding of what the Eucharist is deepened.

Things like altar rails are not just "encrustations" to be scraped off our churches.  They are concrete signs that we came to understand the Blessed Sacrament more and more over time and that that understanding drove people more and more humbly to their knees.

Also, there is a practical use of the Communion rail.  It helps those who are old or injured to kneel and rise again.  Sure conferences have said they prefer people to stand for Communion, but Holy Church guarantees that they can kneel.  Furthermore, mark my words that kneeling for Communion will make a come back.  It remains, after all, the norm.

I suppose a priest could say that he must put the rails in to help keep his insurance costs down.

I heard recently that Dominus Est, by Anthanasius Schneider and with a forward by Archbp. Ranjith is coming out in English.  This little book contains a strong argument for a return to kneeling for Communion on the tongue.  The Holy Father now only gives Communion on the tongue to those kneeling.

We must have a return to kneeling, people.  That means that we will need Communion rails.

There is nothing, as far as I know, directing us against them, other than wacko liturgists and those who have been duped by them over the years.

More Kneeling Now!

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
70 Comments