QUAERITUR: broadcast/recorded Mass when you can’t attend

I received a question by e-mail:

Dear Father Z,

It’s commonly accepted that shut-ins and invalids who are unable to go to church can fulfill their Sunday obligation by watching a live Mass on TV. It’s that "live" part that is the reason for my writing.

My problem concerns traveling (in my case, required business travel which I’m doing as I write this) and not being able to get to Mass due to scheduling conflicts with airlines, etc. Nor being able to understand the local language anyway since the universal language is no longer used. In those cases, rather than miss it altogether (an "excused absence"?) do you think watching a prerecorded Mass on a TV or PC could count as an honest effort and be just as valid as the live Mass for the invalids? I would use an EF recording, of course, and substitute the correct Propers from my missal for the ones on the video.

First, I appreciate your desire to fulfill your obligations regarding Mass on the necessary days.

However, I need to disabuse you, and everyone else reading this, about a what you say is "commonly accepted".

 

People do not fulfill their Sunday or Holy Day Obligations to attend Mass by watching a recording or transmission of a Mass, regardless if they are shut-ins or not.

If people are impeded from attending Holy Mass for a serious reason, for example they are invalids or they are ill, or even if they are terrified of slipping and falling on the ice during winter, they are excused their obligation.

God does not ask of us what is not possible.

So, watching Mass on TV, etc., can be a holy and pious thing to do, but it does not fulfill the obligation strictly speaking.

As far as traveling is concerned, there are certainly those situations when, for example, you are in a strange place and finding a Mass in the narrow period of time allowed would be a serious difficulty.  In those cases, you are excused your obligation. 

Of course God cannot be fooled.  If you have 8 hours and the church is next to your hotel, and there are three Masses scheduled during that time, you might not have a very good excuse.  I suppose if the Mass is being celebrated in Swahili, and you are psychologically terrified of hearing the Swahili language for some reason, that could be a mitigating factor.  So would the sure knowledge that the dopey priest and his weird staff have scheduled liturgical abuses sure to infuriate you to the point of near occasion of mortal sin.   But I digress.

If people are seriously impeded from attending Mass, their obligation is mitigated.  It is good to want to watch something, and I applaud that.  But let’s understand what is happening.  Language like "just as valid" doesn’t apply.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
68 Comments

QUAERITUR: Resources for explain Mass and things to children

I think you readers can help with this one.

 

Dear Father Zuhlsdorf,

I am a cradle Catholic with three children, we have a family rule that on the way home from Mass the children can ask me questions about the mass itself, the readings, homily etc rather than asking during the mass when we should be paying attention and worshipping.  However as they get older the questions they ask me are more involved and regard the symbolism used and other more theological questions. Some of these I can answer easily, and others stump me. This makes me want to learn more both for myself and for them. I strongly believe my vocation as their mother is to teach them in their faith.

I went to my local Catholic book store but they did not have the type of book I was looking for so I am wondering if you can recommend to me a good book that teaches about the Mass and why we use the symbols and so on that we do. Our Parish Priest and Deacon are very happy to answer questions, but I would like to be able to learn more about this and answer my children’s questions when they arise on the way home from Mass rather than making them wait to as Father the next week.

That’s a nice practice, getting the kids to ask about Mass and the preaching.  That would help them pay attention.  Well done!

And now you are up against a wall.

I think there could be different sets of reading material divided in a couple ways.

First, things for you or for your children… we don’t know their ages.

Second, things about the older form of Mass or about the Novus Ordo… we don’t know which you attend.

So, folks, how about chiming in with suggestions for these possible permutations!

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
37 Comments

QUAERITUR: The “liturgist”

You know the jokes…

What’s the difference between a liturgist and a terrorist?  …

or

You find yourself with two terrorists and liturgist and only have two bullets in your gun….

So, today I received this question:

Fr. Z,
                I deeply love the liturgy and am greatly saddened at the improper celebration of it that is so common in America.  I have been considering this step for some time now and have decided, through prayer, to begin looking more seriously at the possibility of actualizing it.  Curious yet?  I wanted to inquire about becoming a liturgist.  I know, properly speaking, the job should fall to priests.  However, I don’t believe that seminaries are doing the job they ought to be (I have some good evidence of this from my seminarian friends).  From what I have seen there is no degree offered for liturgists, but there ought to be a field of study and a validation format so that some crazy person cannot read some books and insert their own slanted opinion of the liturgy.

I ask for two reasons, one is concern for some people who call themselves liturgists and the other is to ensure that if I pursue this desire, that I do so within orthodoxy and in line with the magisterium.  Thank you for your time in reading and answering my question.

I admire your courage!

 

Yes, degrees are given in liturgical studies.  For example, at Sant’Anselmo in Rome you can get just about any sort of training you want, good, bad or indifferent, depending on your desire to work hard and keep your head clear of some of the strangeness you are still bound to encounter.
 
Perhaps others would like to chime in about programs for degrees in liturgy.

In the meantime, I have often mused about the need for a new order of priests called the Rubricians.  Their apostolate would be to save the world through saving the liturgy.  Thus, they go forth to teach clerics and seminarians to say the black and, well.. just do the red, if you get my drift.   Their habit would be a black Roman cassock, trimed in, of course, red, and with a fascia of, of course, red and a black biretta…. which could be trimmed as well.

But, in in the meantime, I suppose you can start be studying liturgy. 

Learn Latin and Greek, friend, along with Itailan, French and German.  Start now.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
45 Comments

England/Rome: 12-27 September

I will probably be in England for the launch of Usus Antiquior on 14 September and then drop down to Rome for a few days for the conference on Summorum Pontificum.

Posted in What Fr. Z is up to |
1 Comment

REVIEW: Handbook for Laundering Liturgical Linens

You might recall that some time ago I posted a preview of a booklet projected by Angelus Press.

It is now out:

Handbook for Laundering Liturgical Linens.

This is a very useful booklet!

Anyone with a parish or chapel who would like to get people involved in the care of altar linens would be wise to purchase copies of this nicely printed pamphlet for distribution.

As I wrote in my preview: I am highly in favor of anything that will help other people learn how properly to iron purificators, corporals, amices… all that stuff.

That said, I was a little puzzled why on the cover of the pamphlet they seem to have chosen to place the corporal upside down on the altar beneath the chalice.

Here is shot that gives you a sense also of the paper used for the cover, which I think is the clay-treated paper often found in magazines.  It picks up your finger prints, but.. so what.

Notice the way the corporal is laid out, with the folds up.  The point of a corporal is, in part, to retain particles of the Host within it, when folded up like an envelop.  So.. I would have put it the other way.

But this can be easily corrected in a future printing, I imagine.

Here is the page with the instructions for the corporal.

I see in the back, in a "Guidelines and Tips" section, they may have taken a tip from me both from the blog entry and a phone conversation.  They included a line or two about priests first washing the linens and putting the water down the sacrarium before sending them off to be worked on.  Also, they picked up on the washing bags for amices.  There was some good discussing on laundering tips at that preview entry I posted.

Now if I could get someone to do the linens for the Sabine Farm!

So, the pamphlet is short, but packed: 12pp. Softcover, illustrated. $2.95

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, REVIEWS |
20 Comments

A belated photo

Far from the solitude of the Sabine Farm, here is a shot from the Indians game in Cleveland the other night.

I will get some other photos of the present journey up presently.

Posted in My View |
7 Comments

QUAERITUR: audibility of prayers during a TLM

I got this from a reader.  

Dear Father,

I have always wondered about the sound during TLM’s.  Now first off, I have only attended one low Mass.  It was a beautiful experience, however I found myself wishing that I could hear some of the beautiful Latin prayers.  I am not speaking of the prayers that are to be said softly or inaudibly, but rather the prayers said aloud by the priest and server.  Since the Mass was in a largish church (I was only about 8 rows back from the front), I could hear nothing of these audible prayers.  Mostly, I could not even hear murmuring or sound of any kind when the parts were being spoken.  The only way I could follow in the missal was by the priests gestures (which was still easy to follow).

Here is my question:  Wouldn’t it be beneficial for the people to hear the audible prayers of the priest and server? 

I am not proposing wireless microphones or anything, but perhaps a simple (hidden) microphone near that altar that could pick-up these audible prayers.  To keep the proper “feel” of the Mass, the levels would need to be kept low.  The words should not be as loud as at the usual novus ordo Mass, but should sound natural.   I wonder if this would particularly help those who are transitioning from the novus ordo.

I am very interested to hear your opinion on this and it may provide some interesting debate, as well.

Thank you for all the wonderful work that is accomplished through your blog.  You have taught me much about the Faith, and for that I am very, very grateful.

Yes, I am sure there will be debate.

I think that the prayers which should be audible should be, well, audible.  I don’t necessarily think that the priest or altar should be miked but they should be pronounced at a reasonable level so that people can hear them from a reasonable distance, even in a large church.  Furthermore, the servers should say the prayers audibly also.  I am all for the role of servers as "representatives" for the people, but they should learn to say the prayers well and will a reasonable tone of voice.

Also, keep in mind that Holy Popes of yesteryear also advocated that the congregation make responses together with the servers.  I explained the various ways that can be done in another post.

What we encounter quite often is a rigid attitude of total silence, especially imposed by some members of the congregation who think it is a capital crime to utter anything, such as a response to Dominus vobiscum.  These types will often hiss down or glare at those who dare to respond with Et cum spiritu tuo so as to intimidate others into the sort of silence they think is appropriate.  

Surely we should do our best to fit with the prevailing sense of the congregation and the style of the place where we attended, provided it is reasonable.  On the other hand, we also must recognize that during Holy Mass the congregation does have a role.  A proper understanding of "active participation" also opens outward, to external expressions too.  In the TLM those are mostly the quiet responses to the priest’s invitations, and so forth.

Again, I don’t think the microphone is the best solution.  As a matter of fact, this is why the paradigmatic Mass of the Roman Rite is sung: so that it can be audible.  But neither should anyone be shouting for the sake of filling the space to the farthest pew.
 

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box |
86 Comments

OLDIE PODCAzT 42: St. Augustine on St. Lawrence and how to be a Christian

Here is an oldie PODCAzT in honor of the feast of St. Lawrence.

Here is a fast, patristiblogger PODCAzT inspired by the second selection from today’s Office of Readings on this feast of St. Lawrence, deacon and martyr in Rome. We hear St. Augustine of Hippo’s sermo 304, preached probably in Hippo Regius in 417 on St. Lawrence’s Day.

The sermon is short enough that we can hear the whole thing.

We have the English first, to get the content into your head, followed by the whole sermon in Latin, to get your Latin ears tuned.



St. Augustine of Hippo preached various sermons on St. Lawrence. Here is another one the bishop preached in about the year 401.  It might not be quite what you expected, however!  It sure wasn’t what Augustine himself expected, you can bet on that.

Put yourself in the cathedral of Carthage on a bright morning. Bishops and emissaries are gathering from all over a great council to be held in a couple weeks. You perhaps came to see the interesting people from near and far. You are standing in the nave of the basilica and the light streams through the upper story alabaster windows in dusty shafts. Incense is still wafting from the presbyterium. It is August in N. Africa and it is blazing hot already in the morning. It is clear that Augustine, a very junior bishop in the crowd, had had no intention of preaching, but you watch as the primate of Carthage Bishop Aurelius and bishops of the North African delegation pressure him into saying something in the presence of the representatives from Rome who are there for the upcoming meeting.

Augustine reluctantly takes his seat in a chair in the center takes the scroll of the Scriptures in his lap and begins (s. 305A).

1. Because the audience is getting bored and restless, the sermon was supposed to have been cancelled [subtrahendus fuit]; but out of respect for the martyr, it has to be given. So with the Lord’s help it will be so timed that it is neither burdensome, not yet cut too short to do justice to the subject. In Rome today has dawned as one of the greatest feasts there, which is celebrated by a great concourse of the people; we are uniting ourselves to our brothers and sisters there in one body, under one head, absent indeed in body, but still present in spirit. After all, it’s not only where the tomb of his body is, that the memory of his merits is celebrated. Devotion is owed to him everywhere; his flesh is laid in one place, but his spirit is triumphant with the one who is everywhere. 

The blessed Lawrence was, as we have been informed, a youth in body, but a man gravity in spirit; the greener his age, the more unfading was the victor’s wreath that commended him so much to our devotion. Well, he was a deacon, subordinate to the bishop in rank, equal to an apostle in his crown. [And with that brief comment on Lawrence, Augustine spends the next ten paragraphs talking about everything except Lawrence!] Now this kind of festival of al the glorious martyrs has been instituted in the Church so that those who didn’t see them suffering may be led by faith to imitate them, and may be reminded of them by the festival. It’s probable, you see, that what wasn’t repeated by an annual commemoration would escape people’s minds altogether. And we can’t have fervent celebrations of all the martyrs everywhere, because then not day would pass without them; I mean, you could scarcely find a single day in the whole course of the year, on which some martyrs were not somewhere rewarded with the victor’s crown. But if fervent celebrations were a continuous event, they would induce boredom; while intervals between them renew our loving interest. For our part, let us simply listen to what we have been commanded, attend to what we have been promised. On the festivals of any martyrs you like, let us prepare our hearts to celebrate them in such a way that we do not cut ourselves off from imitating them.

At this point Augustine launches himself into to an extended and rambling talk about the different ways people celebrate and never says another word about Lawrence! He seems to be taking a few swipes at the Roman delegation there too. Then he talks about St. Cyprian of Carthage, who is far more interesting for the natives anyway, and then takes some shots at their overdoing the feast of St. Cyprian.

This is one of those sermons that Augustine, who is feeling a little testy and put upon, just doesn’t seem to be able to bring to a close easily. This often happens when people who don’t really want to speak are put in a position of having to say something anyway. And his swift writing stenographers were there and caught every word for us.

And, since I read lots of Ambrose and not just Augustine, here is what the mighty bishop of Milan had to say:

In his work De officiis ministrorum, echoing Cicero, St. Ambrose of Milan (+397) spoke about martyrs. He lingers a bit over the conversation between St. Pope Sixtus II (whose feast we had the other day) and his great deacon, the Spanish born but by adoption Roman, St. Lawrence. Who died this day in 258 on the Via Tiburina.

1.41.204. What is to be said about little children of two years who obtained the palm of victory before they had any awareness of what was going on around them? And what is to be said of Saint Agnes? Exposed to the danger of losing the two most precious goods, chastity and life, she defended chastity and exchanged life for immortality.

205. We cannot pass over Saint Lawrence, who, seeing his bishop Sixtus being led to martyrdom began to weep, not because he was being led away to die, but because he would have to outlive him. He began, therefore, to shout loudly, "Where are you going, Father, without your son? Where are you hurrying off to, O holy bishop, without your deacon? You never offered the Sacrifice without your minister. What about me has displeased you, O Father? Perhaps you have found me to be unworthy? At least reconsider whether you chose a suitable minister. Do you not want him to whom you entrusted the Blood of the Lord to shed with you his own blood, whom you caused to participate in the sacred mysteries? Be careful that while your fortitude is being praised, your judgment doesn’t waver. The ridicule of a student is a bad mark for the teacher. It is necessary to remember that great and famous men are victorious through the victorious examples of their students even more than by their own. After all, Abraham offered his own son, Peter sent Stephen before him. O Father, let you also show forth your virtue in the person of your son. Offer up the one you instructed, so as to reach the eternal prize in the glorious company, safe and sure of your justice."

206. And Sixtus replied to him: "I am not leaving you, O my son, I am not abandoning you; but even greater trials are reserved for you. Because we are old an easier track to the contest was allotted; Because you are young, for you there is fated a more glorious triumph over tyranny. You will be coming shortly, so cease your weeping: you’ll follow me within three days. It is fitting that there be this interval between a bishop and a levite. It would not be worthy for you to come through to victory under the guide of your master, as if you were looking for help. Why are you asking to share in my martyrdom? I am leaving you my entire inheritance. Why are you requiring that I be present? Students who are still weak are going before their master, and those now strong, who do not have need for any more instruction are following him in order to win through without him. In such a way Elijah left behind Elisha. I am entrusting to you the inheritance of of my virtue."

207. There was a contest between them, a truly worthy contest to be fought out by a bishop and a deacon: who would be the first to suffer for Christ? They say that in the performances of tragic plays the audience would burst out in great applause when Pylades said he was Orestes and Orestes, as he indeed was, affirmed that he was Orestes: Pylades who was to be killed in Orestes place, Orestes in order to prevent Pylades from being him in his stead. But both of them shouldn’t have been allowed to live since they were guilty of the crimes of parricide: the one because he truly committed the crime and the other because he was an accomplice. In our situation, on the other hand, Saint Lawrence was driven by no other desire that to immolate himself for the Lord. Three days later, while mocking the tyrant he was burned on a grate: "This side’s done," he said, "turn me over and have a bite." ["Assum est, inquit, versa et manduca."] And so it was that he bested the heat of the flames with the might of his spirit.

Some other old PODCAzTs:

041 07-08-09 Ratzinger on liturgical silence; silent Eucharist Prayer
040 07-08-02 Eusebius of Vercelli in exile; my column in The Wanderer on detractors of Summorum Pontificum
039 07-07-27 St. Augustine on Christ the Mediator; “for all” or “for many”?

038 07-07-25 Ratzinger on “active participation”; The Sabine Farm; Merry del Val’s music

037 07-07-18 The position of the altar and the priest’s “back to the people”

Posted in Patristiblogging, PODCAzT |
5 Comments

15 August: Camden, NJ – Solemn TLM – Assumption of BVM

On 15 August I am to preach for the Solemn Mass for the Feast of the Assumption at the Cathedral of Camden, NJ.

The Mass is an annual event organized by the wonderful Mater Ecclesiae community in Berlin, NJ, the great Fr. Robert Pasley is Rector.

Fr. Pasley said that the music this year, in addition to Gregorian chant and motets, will be of the Venetian school.  This should be wonderful.

Two years ago I participated at this Holy Mass and it was a wonderful experience. There were posts here and here.

I urge you, if you are in the region, to consider attending.

Friday, 15 August
7:00 PM

The Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception
Broadway & Market Street, Camden, NJ

 

 

Posted in What Fr. Z is up to |
1 Comment

Oldie PODCAzT 39: Augustine on Christ the Mediator; “for all” or “for many”?

One year ago today I posted this "oldie" PODCAzT which dealt with a question under discussion still today: the translation of the words "pro multis" in the consecration of the Most Precious Blood during Holy Mass. 

It seemed right for me to present it anew.


https://zuhlsdorf.computer/podcazt/07_07_27.mp3

In today’s PODCAzT, we hear from St. Augustine of Hippo (+430) who contributes to the second reading in today’s Office of Readings.  The selection is from Bk 10 of the Confessions. 

I use that as a spring board into a look at the issue of the fruits of Christ’s Sacrifice.  Were they "for all" or "for many"? 

When the new translation for Holy Mass is released we will no longer hear "for all" but "for many", which is more accurate. 

Still, we need to understand what is at the heart of the debate. 

Joseph Ratzinger will help us figure this out along with a paragraph from the Roman Catechism of the Council of Trent.

This PODCAzT was a bit of an experiment.  I changed a couple of my recording techniques and also just "winged it" with many notes for my comments, just to see if I could speed up the production time.

Some other oldies from that time period.


Posted in Patristiblogging, PODCAzT |
3 Comments