MAZZA: The Importance of the Value of Reputation, Part II

At Homiletic and Pastoral Review (yes, it still exists), find the second part of important work by civil and canon lawyer Michael Mazza (whom I’ve known for a zillion years).   He now works as a canonist especially in defense of priests.  HERE

The Importance of the Value of Reputation, Part II

People who are accused of crimes have a right to proper process and to their good name (bona fama). Both of those often go out the door in the case of priests who are falsely accused and/or cancelled. In this offering, Mazza starts with some Patristic references to bona fama and then traces papal comments in the more modern Magisterium.

A sample:

We note in conclusion that such evidence stands for the proposition that the good of bona fama has been valued, in a variety of contexts and time periods, as a fundamental human good. This article has also referenced several well-known artistic works, emanating from diverse cultures and at various points in history, that also testify to enduring truths concerning the good of bona fama. The extent of all this evidence suggests that there would be something profoundly inhuman, and therefore deeply disturbing, about any community that neglects to care for the right to reputation of its members. Such attentiveness for reputation is particularly important when the prevailing cultural zeitgeist militates against the right to bona fama by demanding quick guilty verdicts so as to quench the popular thirst for vengeance.

Owing to the power of speech itself, along with the close link between a person’s name and his very identity, we saw how the witness of Sacred Scripture, the early Church, and centuries of theological tradition have established the foundations on which the current juridical framework protecting a cleric’s right to bona fama rests. Authentic developments in magisterial teaching on the issue of reputation support the conclusion that respect for bona fama is not only an essential element of any human community, but that it is particularly important in the life of the Church, especially for its clergy. In light of such evidence, it is incomprehensible for an ecclesial community professing fidelity to the incarnate Word of God to ignore or downplay a right so fundamental as the right to reputation. We have seen how our bona fama is linked to our physical, mental, social, and spiritual health; we have also examined how closely connected is a person’s name to his very life. In this light, then, we can more easily see the fundamental hypocrisy at work if one professes caritas but permits calumnia.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Priests and Priesthood | Tagged , ,
4 Comments

How to force a new ecclesiology on the Church. It takes time.

At Rorate today there is a useful piece by Roberto de Mattei. In spite of his strange jabberings about “the jab” It is useful in that it provides a few concise paragraphs that put into perspective where we have been and where we are now.

Here are examples.

John XXIII attributed a specific pastoral character to the Council that was opening. Historians of the school of Bologna have defined the pastoral dimension of Vatican II as “constitutive”. This pastoral dimension became the form of the Magisterium par excellence. At first this was not evident to all, but in the following months and years, it became clear that John XXIII’s allocution was the manifesto of a new ecclesiology. And this ecclesiology, according to progressive theologians, was supposed to be the foundation of a new Church, opposed to the “Constantinian” one of Pius XII. A Church no longer militant, no longer defining and assertive, but itinerant and in dialogue: a synodal church.

In this new perspective, the Holy Office, which for centuries had been the Church’s bulwark against the errors that attacked it, no longer had a reason to exist, or in any case, had to change its mission.1

On 8 November 1963, the cardinal archbishop of Cologne, Josef Frings (1887–1978), asked to speak and, to general surprise, launched a violent attack against the Holy Office, directed by Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani (1890–1979). In front of all the bishops of the Church gathered under the presidency of the pope, Frings denounced the “immoral methods” of the Holy Office, stating that its procedure “no longer suits our age, harms the Church and is an object of scandal for many”.

This is a good summation. Link it to what John O’Malley proposed in his book on Vatican II, namely that the true “spirit” of the Council, it’s true message, is in the different tone it sets, and we have more pieces of the mosaic.

De Mattei draws a parallel with the man Paul VI put into the newly minted CDF (olim Holy Office) as undersecretary (sent to change the operation and goals of the congregation, which is how Francis has worked) with the appointment of the kissy-book writer and probable plagiarist from Argentina.

The anecdote at the end, which I had never heard, is worth the few minutes.

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged
12 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 749

Here’s a puzzle.

Black to move and win.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit.

Chesscomshop Banner

There was a fun couple of games in a short video at chess.com (I have a shop affiliate, btw). GM David Howell takes on Magnus in a game where all the pieces look the same, because they are all Airthings (which I think about air purity monitors and Magnus is into that). And the clock is sort of far, so … it’s a factor. And I am glad to report that Magnus got a haircut. Well… part of a haircut. More, Magnus, more.  Video is HERE

Given that guys at this level can play blindfolded, even simuls… I am not sure how hard this was for them. It’s still fun.

In other news, Hikaru Nakamura got hitched to Iranian WGM Atousa Pourkashiyan.

In other news, in the Vatican trial of Card. Becciu, involved in the London property 140 million euro loss fiasco, the prosecutor is seeking a sentence of 7 years and 3 months in jail.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

INTERVIEW: One of my profs in Rome Dr. John Rist with Ed Pentin: The Catholic Church Could Be Facing a Crisis Worse Than the Arian Controversy of the 4th Century

Ed Pentin, surely Rome’s best English language commentator on Church matters these days, has an interview with Dr. John Rist, a professor at Cambridge and also in Rome at my school, the Patristic Instititute Augustinianum.  I had several courses from him.

Rist has a piece in the recently published The Faith Once For All Delivered: Doctrinal Authority in Catholic Theology,a set of important essays by world class scholars with forward and afterword by Cardinals Burke and Sarah.   It is about sensus fidelium.  VERY IMPORTANT.  US HERE – UK HERE

I’ve written about Rist’s brilliant, hard, books over the years.  HERE  You can read about how he was cancelled in 2019 by the Vatican after he signed a letter critical of Francis.  He was banned from all pontifical institutions.  CUA even cancelled his Festschrift.

Rist was interviewed by Pentin now probably because Rist has a new book which is to be released 27 June 2023 (tomorrow, as I write):

Infallibility, Integrity and Obedience: The Papacy and the Roman Catholic Church, 1848-2023 US HERE – UK HERE

BTW… go to amazon and take a look at the titles that John M Rist as authored or written for. Amazing.

The interview deals throughout also with treatment of an Italian priest Fr Tullio Rotondo who was suspended a divinis by his bishop because he wrote a book critical of Francis and his collaborators.

Here’s a taste:

PENTIN It’s also one thing for a bishop to shut down heresy and heterodoxy, but if it’s orthodoxy, or trying to emphasize orthodox arguments, that’s very odd, isn’t it?

As I say, because Don Tullio has got a position which he’s trying to advocate, and he’s done so by producing material on either side, and has then tried to evaluate it — what the French would call a catalogue raisonné. That, of course, is how things should be sorted out. It’s exactly what people should be doing. Don Tullio has a doctorate in theology. It’s his job to think about these kind of things. And because some bishop doesn’t like his conclusions… Put it this way: this book couldn’t have been written in the time of John Paul II or Benedict XVI, but had it been, he would not have been banned by his bishop. Let’s forget about Amoris Laetitia, if he’d discussed the subject matter of an encyclical, and related matters in the times of Benedict and John Paul, or let alone John XXIII, or Paul VI, for that matter, people would have said, “Yeah, it’s a bit pedantic, long-winded and so on, but of course very useful.” It would not have led to him being suspended by his bishop. Undoubtedly, it would not.

PENTIN What does it tell us about this time in the Church?

Well, Don Tullio cites me, and others, in the interview which he gave to Maike Hickson, as well as, for example, John Finnis, who was a professor of law at Oxford, saying that the present crisis is probably the worst the Church has had for centuries, perhaps from its beginning, in some way or another. It’s more dangerous to the existence of the Church. You can compare the Reformation, but I think it’s even more serious than that. You’ve got to go back to the Arian controversy to find something comparable. But I think that, in terms of the damage that it now might cause, what might happen to the Church in the future, this is going to cause more trouble, more than anything else we’ve seen before.

 

Posted in Francis, Hard-Identity Catholicism | Tagged
6 Comments

The persecution of traditional Catholic faithful continues: TLM forbidden at St. John Vianney’s shrine in France

Remember: It’s not just the rites that they fear, because they make them uncomfortable, it’s the people who desire those rites whom they really distain. It’s the people.

Posted in Liberals, Pò sì jiù, Traditionis custodes | Tagged
10 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 748

 

Welcome registrant:

jo_c

Click!
There’s a back story, too.

White to move. Mate in 2.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

I can’t recommend this enough.

Crucifixion to Creation: Roots of the Traditional Mass Traced back to Paradise

US HERE – UK HERE

Meanwhile, the greatest players in the world are heading to Baku, Azerbajian for the FIDE World Cup ($2.5 million prize find). For the first time, the top three players from both the Open and the Women’s section will qualify for the Candidates tournaments. It will last a month, but it is a knock-out format. Lose… go home.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

26 July: Fr. Jacques Hamel, martyred 7 years ago in France

Interrupted while saying Mass at his parish church in Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray, the 85-year old priest struggled to repel his two 18-year old attackers with his feet. “Go away Satan!”, he repeated.

Fr. Jacques Hamel was murdered, in odium fidei, a martyr to the Faith, his throat slashed by Islamic terrorists.

Today is the 7th anniversary of the martyrdom of Fr. Jacques Hamel in France.

Churches are being attacked and destroyed all over France… and elsewhere.

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia, pray for us.
St. Lawrence of Brindisi, pray for us.
St. Pius V, pray for us.
Martyrs of Otranto, pray for us.
St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle.
Our Lady of Victory, intercede for us with your Divine Son.

Posted in Modern Martyrs, Saints: Stories & Symbols |
1 Comment

From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 2019-07-24 – Vetitum

EDITOR’S NOTE:

The problem with the Pie Town Couple started HERE when they had their photo taken with the +F. Atticus and then said “The bishop blessed our marriage”. More on 13 June 13: HERE This was the Pie Town couple’s situation as of 7 July: HERE


July 24th, 2023

Dear Diary,

The guy from Pie Town who claims he’s getting the run around? Not so much. The man knew he had some kind of prohibition for him getting married in church unless he went for counseling or treatment. So he wanted another answer. That’s why he came over to Fr. Bruce. We’re sending him back to his own diocese and Fr. “Anything Goes” Bob. I asked if I could remove the ‘vetitum’ (the canon people corrected my spelling of it) but I was told I can’t because the man lives in the Pie Town diocese and is not my subject. Dang it. I wanted to be the hero in this thing. Have fun with that, Dozer! I least I can send a follow up to the Nuncio and let him know these folks don’t even live in my diocese!

Posted in Canon Law, Diary of Bp. McButterpants | Tagged
4 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 747

Meanwhile, a puzzle.

White to play.  Mate in two.  I’ll make this a little larger today so you can see the notation more easily.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Chesscomshop Banner

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

I hope you will make use of the links to the various Catholic concerns which I post in these daily “omnium gatherums”.   You and they both benefit.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
6 Comments

25 July St. James the Greater, Apostle

Today is the Feast of St James the Greater, Apostle, brother of St John the Apostle Evangelist and a son of Zebedee.  These brother were called the “Sons of Thunder… Boanerges“.

He was put to death around AD 42-44.  His feast marks the translation of his relics which are believed to be in Santiago de Compostela, in Galicia, Spain.

Sts. Peter, John, and James were the inner core of the inner circle around the Lord.

This James is distinguished from James “the Lesser”.  “Greater” perhaps refers to his age or his height.  James the Less was a cousin of Christ being the son of the Mary married to Clopas (John 19:25).  Alphaeus and Clopas are versions of the same name.

Back to James the Greater.

Today is the Feast of St. James the Greater.

One of the striking moments in the Gospel involving this James, with John his brother, is when their mother asks the Lord for “glory” for them.  They affirm the request.  They got what they asked for, but not in the way they thought.  John lived to old age, the last to die, and James was the first to die: direct opposites.  “Glory”, in the Gospel of John, as in John 17 when Jesus says to the Father, “Glorify your Son” and John remarks that, at Calvary, he had “seen His glory”, John means the Passion and crucifixion of the Lord.   Both John and James were glorified.  John did not escape martyrdom, by the way.  When he was in Rome he was arrested and several times they tried to kill him, to no avail.  He was exiled to Patmos.

All of us have to drink the chalice.  To be with Christ in heaven, we who bear his name and mark have to follow him to the Cross before the resurrection.   The chalice for most people is not martyrdom of blood.  But it always has to be the martyrdom of loving obedience to God’s will as it is lived out in our vocations, whatever vocation that may be.

Each person’s vocation has its particular chalice to drink.

I note with interest a particular word in today’s Collect for St. James.  Let’s see if you notice it too.

Esto, Dómine, plebi tuæ sanctificátor et custos: ut, Apóstoli tui Iacóbi muníta præsídiis, et conversatióne tibi pláceat, et secúra mente desérviat.

Variations of this appear in ancient sacramentaries, such as the Gregorian, for feasts of apostles and other occasions. There are variants, such as “Esto protector, Domine, populi tui propitiatus et rector eique…“.

A literal translation:

O Lord, be the sanctifier and the guard of your people, so that, fortified with the assistances of Your Apostle James, it may both please You by their manner of living and also zealously serve You with a tranquil mind.

A looser translation:

Protect Your people and make them holy, O Lord, so that, guarded by the help of Your Apostle James, they may please You by their conduct and serve You with peace of mind.

See it?

Custos.

ACTION ITEM! Be a “Custos Traditionis”! Join an association of prayer for the reversal of “Traditionis custodes”.

Here is Pope Benedict at Santiago where the huge censer, the “Botafumerio” is charged up and swung.  I can’t help but think that the Pontiff might have been slightly apprehensive.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments