ASK FATHER: Bishops who forbid priests from saying Traditional Latin Mass

mass TLMFrom a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I recently received a question concerning the Traditional Latin Mass. I was asked what can a priest do if his bishop stops him from celebrating the Traditional Latin Mass because he dislikes the TLM or disagrees with Summorum Pontificum.

Is there a document that legally protects him and allows him to petition the Holy See?

Today seems an appropriate day for this question.

Yes, there is a document which protects such a priest: Summorum Pontificum.

Read it in conjunction with the 1983 Code of Canon Law.

A Latin Church diocesan bishop cannot override papal legislation intended for the whole Latin Church.  If he tries, a priest can have recourse – with the help of canon lawyer or not – to the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei” (sending proofs, copies of documentation, etc.).

His Excellency
Most Rev. Guido POZZO
Secretary of the
Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei
Palazzo del Sant’Uffizio
00120 VATICAN CITY

A priest so treated must decide whether or not this is a hill that he would like to die on.  Keep in mind that a bishop can crucify a priest in a thousand creative ways.

That said, it could be The Good Fight that Father needs to fight.  We have to stand up to oppressors for the sake of a good cause.  And this is a good cause.

Use of the older form, the Traditional Latin Mass is a good thing for the priest himself. Even if he said it only in private, it would have a knock-on effect with all the people whom the priest serves.  Use of the older Mass shapes the priest.  Participation in the traditional Mass by congregations with such a priest has an even bigger knock-on effect.

Summorum Pontificum was a truly amazing, effective and timely gift to the whole Church.

Thank you Pope Benedict XVI.

Oh… and another thing….

In cases such as these, in addition – or in lieu of – recourse to the Holy See one could possibly have recourse to The Bux Protocol™.

Posted in Canon Law, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Priests and Priesthood, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged ,
10 Comments

Words from the Last Testament of Joachim Card. Meisner

It seems there is a video going about of Card. Woelki reading from the will of the late Joachim Card. Meisner (most recently known as one of the Four Cardinals of the Five Dubia).

Like everyone, I do not know the hour or the day of my death, nor the way or where I will die. Therefore I’d like to write down one last word to you all that will be read at an appropriate moment. It is really a last word for you in this world to Jesus Christ. Lord Jesus Christ, you are the Word through which everything is created. I thank you that you wanted me and that I was therefore created. Your Word accompanied me through life and led me through the world and around people when in need. Therefore I became a priest and then a bishop. Moulded and ordained by your stigmata. The most remarkable thing about my life is that you redeemed me through your Cross and deemed me worthy of your sufferings. Through your love for the world, your heart, your hands, your feet were punctured. Out of love for mankind you touched me with your Cross. You let me be your priest and your bishop. Therefore, especially in death, I want to praise the Cross of our Lord, Jesus Christ which brought joy into the world. In the Divine Office I witness and profess with our priests emphatically: Christ, divine Lord, you are loved only by those who have the power to love. Christ, you are my hope, my peace, my joy, my whole life. Christ, my soul draws towards you Christ, to you I pray. Christ, I hold myself close to you. With all the strength of my soul, I love you, Lord, alone, I seek you, I follow you. In this joy, I tried to serve you all in the Archdiocese of Cologne. Our Bishopric town of Cologne bears the honorary title Sancta Colonia Dei Gratia Romanae Ecclesiae Fidelis Filia – Holy Cologne, by the grace of God, the Roman Church’s faithful daughter. I tried conform to this expression in my episcopal service. Christ gave the Petrine office to the Church in order to give an orientation and support to the many people in the different times. That is my last request to you all for your salvation. Stay with our Holy Father. He is the Peter of today. Follow his guidance. Listen to his word. Peter wants nothing for himself, but everything for the Lord and for his brothers and sisters. You all know the course of my life followed three societal systems – the 12 years of Hitler, 24 year reign of communism and now over 20 years of democratic freedom. In all three epochs, the service of the pope has given me orientation, encouragement and assistance. Remain always with the Pope and you will never lose Christ. I do not desire the grace which the Apostle John received, nor the forgiveness with which you pardoned Peter. I only desire the words which you said to the robber on the Cross: “Today you will be with me in Paradise.”

Cologne, 25 March 2011

Joachim Cardinal Meisner, Archbishop of Cologne

HERE

Meditate daily on the Four Last Things.

GO TO CONFESSION!

Posted in Four Last Things, GO TO CONFESSION | Tagged
16 Comments

10th Anniversary of release of Summorum Pontificum! So…. TIE ONE ON!

I’m tying one on for the 10th anniversary of the release of the text of Summorum Pontificum (aka The Emancipation Proclamation).

Last week the Extraordinary Ordinary ordained three young men for the Holy Priesthood to serve in the Diocese of Madison.  The TMSM was happy to provide some of the vestments.

Of note were the use of Roman vestments and – in particular – maniples all around, by the ordaining bishop and by the newly ordained priests.

17_06_30_ordination_01

I post this as a special tribute to the desire of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI, expressed in his game-changing Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum – that there should be a “mutual enrichment” of the two “forms” (let’s just call them “rites” and have done).

There is nothing wrong with the use of the maniple in the Novus Ordo.  If a set has the maniple, Fathers, put it on.  And say the proper prayer when putting it on:

Merear, Domine, portare manipulum fletus et doloris; ut cum exsultatione recipiam mercedem laboris.

May I be made meritorious, O Lord, to bear a maniple of weeping and sorrow, so that I might receive with exaltation labor’s reward.

MANIPLES, Gentlemen!

maniple tie one on

UPDATE:

I received this note from a reader…

I will note that the CDW Compendium on the Eucharist includes the vesting prayer for the maniple (without any note such as “only used in the Extraordinary form”).

The English edition of this text, PUBLISHED BY THE USCCB, includes a translation of this prayer:  HERE

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Benedict XVI, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , , , ,
14 Comments

Reader Feedback and Challenge Coin Update

17_06_26_coin_obverse_02_det-200Today I took a bunch of envelopes containing “challenge coins” to the post office.  These were tokens of gratitude to some benefactors.

Some coins are intended for benefactors, while others will go to friends, to priests who have their own challenge coins or who are going to make them (a few priests have written me about this already), and to military and LEOs out there who might want to exchange.  (CPT G and AC – I have yours).

I am now furnished with proper envelopes, cards, and the correct postage.  I’ll have to drop them personally at the PO with the comment “non-machineable”.  They are just a touch to wide.  But that won’t slow them down, so long as the proper notation is made.  You learn something new every day.

One person who will receive a challenge coin as a token of gratitude wrote this recently in response to a thank you note:

You’re working for all of us out here everyday.  Your blog is a source of information and inspiration that fills many a gap left by others in the Catholic Church.  I sense your trips to Rome recharge your batteries.  What you may not realize is that they recharge ours as well.  I think it’s because in Rome one can immerse oneself in the Catholic culture that so often is lacking in many of our parishes as well as in our society (next time you’re at the Met, take a moment to look at all the bewildered faces walking through the 600’s).  Your blog, btw, has inspired me to familiarize CCD kids with the Greek alphabet and the Greek monograms of Jesus and Christ, and what the heck A & O on those candles stand for.  The Latin INRI they get for dessert.  These fourth graders eat it up.  They even try to write their names in Greek.  Kids that age are sponges – how much are our curriculums missing by not teaching our ancient culture to them – it’s all about the environment and other such pap these days.  So keep it up, dear Father  Z.  You have no idea how many lives your blog has touched and changed – not just for us, your readers, but through us the many others who will never know you personally but will nonetheless be graced by the work that you do.

Thanks for that.  It helps.

It is true that the trips help me to recharge and keep my mind from melting down (especially as I watch what is going on in the Church today – you should see my email and texts).  To use an analogy, sometimes when he gets beaten up rather badly, Superman has to get a dose of light from your planet’s yellow sun in order to recharge his battery and get back to work fighting for truth, justice and the American way.

This isn’t quite me going to Rome, but… hey… you get the drift.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

And so, the Man of Steel now has to plunge down into the depths in order to rid the world of the “artificially created” work of fiends that threatens the safety of the planet. That’s sort of like a day around here, right?

And ain’t it the truth about kids and language?  When I was very small, I remember the first time I was conscious of hearing something in a different language.  I was so intrigued that I went up and down the neighborhood asking people if they knew how to count to 10 in some tongue.  That was my first “trip” into other cultures, as it were.

In any event, I remember benefactors in my prayers and celebrate Masses for your intentions.  This includes those of you who contribute to TMSM projects and who send items via my wish lists.

¡Hagan lío!

Meanwhile, I had to share this too. When I picked up that Superman video (above) I also found this, which is sort of how I feel when I get good feedback from readers.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

May I add that this is also how I feel when one of you tells me that you went to confession after a long time because I keep nagging you.

So…

GO TO CONFESSION!

Posted in ¡Hagan lío! |
Comments Off on Reader Feedback and Challenge Coin Update

ASK FATHER: Can a priest with little Latin say Mass validly?

missale-romanum-altar-missalFrom a reader…

QUAERITUR:

My Latin is not great will an ordinary form mass I celebrate in Latin be valid?

Sure, Father, it would be valid.

Language is a tricky thing.  There are almost always gaps in our comprehension of texts, even in our own, native language.  Moreover, with Holy Mass we are dealing with mysteries, which by definition are hard.

One of ways that narrow-minded bishops hostile to tradition attempted to block the implementation of Summorum Pontificum issued 10 years ago tomorrow! – was to try to impose a Latin language test on priests or they wouldn’t be permitted to use the 1962 Missale Romanum.  Benedict XVI’s Motu Proprio said that priests have to be idoneus which means “suitable” for celebration of Mass.  Tradition-hostile bishops took that to mean “expert in Latin” or such-like.  Of course those bishops, who probably couldn’t have passed the test themselves, didn’t impose tests on priests who said Mass in Spanish.

As an aside, let’s start testing to see if priests really understand what they are saying in the Novus Ordo.  Let’s see if they really know the few clear rubrics there are, according to the 2000 GIRM.  Let’s quiz priests about the content of the prayers and the underlying concepts.  Let’s see if every priest from overseas really understands the English or can if he pronounce it clearly before he is allowed to say Mass in public.  Let’s ask these bishops if they insist with the rectors of seminaries that their seminarians are properly trained in Latin according to can. 249.

Additionally, as it was clarified, idoneus or “suitable” doesn’t require expertise.  Rather, it establishes a minimum rather than a maximum requirement.  The late Card. Egan, a canonist who was not particularly friendly to tradition, clarified that idoneus meant that he had faculties, wasn’t impeded for some reason, and was able to pronounce the words properly.  As far as the Latin language is concerned, idoneus doesn’t mean that you have to be able to compose odes in the style of Horace.

In short, Father, yes, you can celebrate the Novus Ordo, Ordinary Form Mass in Latin and celebrate validly, even if your Latin isn’t very good.

Your patron saint in working on the Latin will be St. John Vianney, whose Latin was so bad that he almost wasn’t ordained.

Keep working on it!  There are good resources available.  Do not give up.  This is the language of your Rite.

We are our rites.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Latin, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Priests and Priesthood, Seminarians and Seminaries, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged , ,
15 Comments

ASK FATHER: Won’t go to Mass celebrated by a married priest

Priest VictimFrom a reader…

QUAERITUR:

What advice can one give to a person who will not go to Mass celebrated by married priest?

GUEST PRIEST RESPONSE: Fr. Tim Ferguson

There is nothing in canon law or theology that prevents people from being silly.

Presumably this silly man, who is refusing the ministrations of a validly ordained priest is fulfilling his obligations elsewhere.

Some folks might not like a priest who is left-handed, or one who is red-headed, or one who wears sandals, or one who has a beard, or one who – with the appropriate and necessary dispensation – has a wife.

It’s all silly, but it can be very hard to argue with silly people.

All things being equal, people are free to choose among the priests available for the sacraments and rites of our Holy Mother Church. Of course, denying the Church has the right to dispense from purely ecclesiastical law is an entirely different thing. That comes dangerously close to heresy.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
52 Comments

The war on John Paul II’s Magisterium: Veritatis splendor

From Sandro Magister.

Müller Out. But the Real Attack Is Against “Veritatis Splendor”

On Sunday, July 2, the very day on which Pope Francis removed Cardinal Gerhard L. Müller as prefect of the congregation for the doctrine of the faith, from all the Catholic churches of the Roman rite [not “all”] at the beginning of Mass the following prayer went up to God, called the “collect” in the [Novus Ordo] missal:

“Deus, qui, per adoptionem gratiæ, lucis nos esse filios voluisti, præsta, quæsumus, ut errorum non involvamur tenebris, sed in splendore veritatis semper maneamus conspicui. Per Dominum nostrum….”

In the official English translation:

“O God, who through the grace of adoption chose us to be children of light, grant, we pray, that we may not be wrapped in the darkness of error but always be seen to stand in the bright light [splendor] of truth. Through our Lord…”

Fate – or divine providence? – would therefore have it that the expulsion of Cardinal Müller should be accompanied by the choral liturgical invocation that the “splendor of truth” may continue to illuminate the Church.

“The splendor of truth” is precisely the title of the most important doctrinal encyclical of John Paul II, published in 1993 [HERE]:

It is an encyclical “on some fundamental questions of the Church’s moral teaching”: precisely the questions that have now returned to being an object of conflict, with extensive and influential sectors of the Church maintaining that it is time to leave behind – especially after the publication of “Amoris Laetitia” – some of the main principles of “Veritatis Splendor.”

It should be enough to observe that no fewer than four of the five “dubia” submitted in September of last year to Pope Francis by cardinals Walter Brandmüller, Raymond L. Burke, Carlo Caffarra, and Joachim Meisner [who just died as of the date of this writing – RIP] hinge precisely on the consistency, or lack thereof, between “Amoris Laetitia” and “Veritatis Splendor.” And these “dubia” still remain completely open, in part because of Pope Francis’s refusal to take them into consideration and to meet with the four cardinals.

But what were the genesis and objective of “Veritatis Splendor”? To answer this question there is one exceptional witness: Joseph Ratzinger.

As Müller’s predecessor at the helm of the congregation for the doctrine of the faith, he contributed in a substantial way to the writing of that encyclical.

But even after his resignation as pope, he continues to judge “Veritatis Splendor” as being of “unchanged relevance,” to be “studied and assimilated” even today.

In 2014, in a thoughtful chapter for a book in honor of John Paul II, Ratzinger pointed to none other than “Veritatis Splendor” as the most important and relevant of that pope’s fourteen encyclicals.

A chapter that deserves a second reading, with an eye to what is happening in the Church today, under the reign of his successor Francis.

Here is the passage dedicated by the “pope emeritus” to that encyclical.

*

ON “VERITATIS SPLENDOR”

The encyclical on moral problems “Veritatis Splendor” took many years to ripen and remains of unchanged relevance.

The constitution of Vatican II on the Church in the contemporary world, contrary to the tendency of moral theology at the time to focus on the natural law, wanted Catholic moral doctrine on the figure of Jesus and his message to have a biblical foundation.

This was attempted by fits and starts for only a brief period. Then the opinion took hold that the Bible does not have any morality of its own to proclaim, but refers to moral models valid for their time and place. Morality is a question of reason, it was said, not of faith.

So on the one hand morality understood in terms of natural law disappeared, but its Christian conception was not affirmed in its place. And since neither a metaphysical nor a Christological foundation could be recognized for morality, recourse was had to pragmatic solutions: to a morality based on the principle of seeking the greater good, in which there is no longer anything truly evil or truly good, but only that which, from the point of view of efficacy, is better or worse.

The great task that John Paul II took on in this encyclical was that of rediscovering a metaphysical foundation in anthropology, as also a Christian concretization in the new image of man in Sacred Scripture.

[NB] Studying and assimilating this encyclical remains a great and important duty.

*

Seeing what is happening today in the Catholic Church, even at its highest levels, all the reasons that motivated the encyclical “Veritatis Splendor” are present once again, with equal if not greater dramatic force.

And they are also making more relevant than ever the prayer to remain “in the splendor of truth” that went up last Sunday from all the churches.

The other day I posted HERE

Erasing the Magisterium of a Pope. Wherein Fr. Z rants and suggests.

In that post I wrote something that could be applied also to Veritatis splendor:

I have from time to time suggested that you form “base communities” to combat the onslaught from within and without the Church on our Three C’s of Cult, Code and Creed.

Here’s a suggestion.  How about starting a reading group, in your parish or down at the local breakfast and coffee shop (where you might be more welcome in some cases).  Choose as your first item Pope John Paul II’s Post-synodal Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris corsortio, (The Role of Christian Family in Modern World) which he penned after the 1980 Synod (“walking together”).

You can get it online (for now). Or, for less than the price of the cup of coffee at the shop you choose, you can get a booklet.

US HERE – UK HERE

Read it with others.  Read it with a pen in hand.

When you hear something that contradicts Familiaris consortio ask questions.

How else do we learn?

Veritatis splendor!

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged
15 Comments

Roman Concrete, the Roman Rite, and YOU

Roman_concreteThe ancient Romans really knew how to build.

They built the Roman Rite, after all.

The Roman Rite is a foundation of the West.

The Roman Rite reflects the Roman “Thing”, its genius.  The Roman genius is to be concrete, clear, concise.

Latin is a cement that holds the Roman Thing together.

I found a new analogy for the use of traditional Roman Rite and Latin in the Novus Ordo Missae celebrated ad orientem.

From the Beeb:

Researchers have unlocked the chemistry of Roman concrete which has resisted the elements for thousands of years.

Ancient sea walls built by the Romans used a concrete made from lime and volcanic ash to bind with rocks.

Now scientists have discovered that elements within the volcanic material reacted with sea water to strengthen the construction.

They believe the discovery could lead to more environmentally friendly building materials.

Unlike the modern concrete mixture which erodes over time, the Roman substance has long puzzled researchers.

Rather than eroding, particularly in the presence of sea water, the material seems to gain strength from the exposure.

In previous tests with samples from ancient Roman sea walls and harbours, researchers learned that the concrete contained a rare mineral called aluminium tobermorite.

They believe that this strengthening substance crystallised in the lime as the Roman mixture generated heat when exposed to sea water.

Researchers have now carried out a more detailed examination of the harbour samples using an electron microscope to map the distribution of elements. They also used two other techniques, X-ray micro-diffraction and Raman spectroscopy, to gain a deeper understanding of the chemistry at play.

This new study says the scientists found significant amounts of tobermorite growing through the fabric of the concrete, with a related, porous mineral called phillipsite.

The researchers say that the long-term exposure to sea water helped these crystals to keep on growing over time, reinforcing the concrete and preventing cracks from developing.

“Contrary to the principles of modern cement-based concrete,” said lead author Marie Jackson from the University of Utah, US, “the Romans created a rock-like concrete that thrives in open chemical exchange with seawater.”

“It’s a very rare occurrence in the Earth.”

The ancient mixture differs greatly from the current approach. Modern buildings are constructed with concrete based on Portland cement.

This involves heating and crushing a mixture of several ingredients including limestone, sandstone, ash, chalk, iron and clay. The fine material is then mixed with “aggregates”, such as rocks or sand, to build concrete structures.

The process of making cement has a heavy environmental penalty, being responsible for around 5% of global emissions of CO2.

So could the greater understanding of the ancient Roman mixture lead to greener building materials?

[…]

The Roman Rite, when respected and used properly, is a rock-solid, enduring structure within and upon which a firm and lofty Catholic identity can be raised heavenward.

Hard-identity Catholicism.

The 1983 Code of Canon Law, can. 249, requires – it doesn’t suggest or recommend or propose – that seminarians be very well trained in Latin: “lingua latina bene calleant“. NB: Not just calleant, says can. 249, but bene calleant. Calleo is “to be practised, to be wise by experience, to be skillful, versed in” or “to know by experience or practice, to know, have the knowledge of, understand”. We get the word “callused” from this verb. We develop calluses when we do something repeatedly. So, bene calleant is “let them be very well versed”. Review also Sacrosanctum Concilium 36 and Optatam totius 13, just to point to documents of Vatican II.

(HEY LIBS!  Vatican II, right?  But you reject Latin you HYPOCRITES because YOU HATE VATICAN II!)

C.S. Lewis in 1933 argued that the rejection of Latin and Greek as a basis of education, was part of a plot devised in Hell to subvert the Faith.

What does it mean for our identity as Catholics in the LATIN Church if we never hear our Latin language in our sacred liturgical worship?

The loss of Latin in our sacred worship has been devastating for our identity as Catholics and, therefore, our influence in the world.

It is as if Hell devised a plot to subvert the Faith.

In some places seminaries confer masters degrees or other sort of pontifical degrees. Imagine a department at a major university conferring a higher degree without the candidate demonstrating proficiency in the languages necessary for his field and research. Imagine someone is given a degree in, say, French literature but she doesn’t know any French. Can you imagine that? Try to get a degree in French literature by reading is solely in translation without the ability to read the original.

And another thing. Circling back to can. 249, which requires Latin, at every ordination someone must stand up and attest that the ordinand was properly trained, etc. But if the ordinand wasn’t given any Latin, as per can 249., can that public statement be true?

The loss of Latin in our sacred worship has devastated our identity as Catholics and, therefore, our influence in the world. The loss of Latin among our clergy has been devastating for our Catholic identity, for our clergy promotes knock on effects through the entire people of God.

Benedict XVI’s Summorum Pontificum – 7 July is the 10th anniversary of the release of the text – was more than just an Emancipation Proclamation for priests and lay people who want the traditional Roman Rite.  It is a far more expansive gift.Roman

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Hard-Identity Catholicism | Tagged , ,
8 Comments

ASK FATHER: Patriotic songs at Mass

CLICK TO BUY

CLICK TO BUY

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Fr. Martin recently wrote an article about how patriotic songs should not be sung during mass. His argument is essentially that most national hymns address the nation rather than God. In all honesty, I think he may be right. It would seem more appropriate to me for songs like America the Beautiful [NOT the magazine] to be sung before or after mass rather than during. However, I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on the matter.

Perhaps he needs a safe space, free from these triggers and aggressions.

If Jesuit James Martin is against them, then let’s all be for them.

The other day after ordinations in the Diocese of Madison, the Extraordinary Ordinary lead us all in singing both the Salve Regina (also not directed to God), and God Bless America (not the magazine). Nobody foamed at the mouth or fainted from shock.

Let’s all sing – after Mass – the Battle Hymn of the Republic:

Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord;
He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored;
He hath loosed the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword:
His truth is marching on.

(Chorus)
Glory, Glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
His truth is marching on.

I have seen Him in the watch-fires of a hundred circling camps,
They have builded Him an altar in the evening dews and damps;
I can read His righteous sentence by the dim and flaring lamps:
His day is marching on.

(Chorus)
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
His day is marching on.

I have read a fiery gospel writ in burnished rows of steel:
“As ye deal with my contemners, so with you my grace shall deal”;
Let the Hero, born of woman, crush the serpent with his heel,
Since God is marching on.

(Chorus)
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Since God is marching on.

He has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
He is sifting out the hearts of men before His judgment-seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer Him! Be jubilant, my feet!
Our God is marching on.

(Chorus)
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Our God is marching on.

In the beauty of the lilies Christ was born across the sea,
With a glory in His bosom that transfigures you and me.
As He died to make men holy, let us die to make men free,
While God is marching on.

(Chorus)
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
While God is marching on.

You can see why a song like this might make certain men nervous and uncomfortable.

Notice that the song says “As He did to make men holy…”.

For the LATIN of the Battle Hymn go HERE (good summer reading tip there, too).  And there’s this!  HERE

It’s okay to have patriotic flags in churches, though they should be placed discreetly at the sides. It is okay to have a patriotic songs on certain national holidays.

Meanwhile…

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
43 Comments

Brick By Brick in Paris

I received a great note from a brand new French priest, ordained for the mighty city of Paris on the great Feast of St. John the Baptist.   He sent links for the video of his ordination in the Cathedral of Notre-Dame.  Ten men were ordained, some of whom intend also to learn the traditional form of Holy Mass.

One of the priests said one of his first Masses at the well-known Saint Eugène, where the traditional form has been offered to the faithful for decades. Here’s photo from the Feast of the Most Precious Blood.

17_07_01_1messe_Eugene_01

Kudos to the newly ordained in Paris!

I get there once in a while. It would be great to meet up.

Posted in Just Too Cool, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM | Tagged
5 Comments